Powerful Ammunition to
Fight Corrupt Judges

Former federal investigator and crusader against corrupt government personnel Rodney Stich has filed various lawsuits in federal courts over the years that sought to report criminal activities in government offices to a federal court under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. These federal filings can be of unprecedented help to anyone or any group seeking to correct the arrogance and corruption in courts that not only inflict great personal and financial harm upon countless people but also subvert government institutions and national interests.

Examining these lawsuits will reveal the following:

Obstruction of Justice by Federal Judges

 Federal judges repeatedly blocked former federal agents from reporting corrupt and criminal activities that were being reported through lawsuits filed under the federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4) that makes it a crime for anyone who knows of a federal crime not to promptly report it to a federal court (or other federal officer).

Implied in that statute, federal judges must receive any reports and offered evidence under the judge's administrative responsibilities. He or she has no discretion whether the reports and evidence are to be received or not; it must be received. However, this requirement was repeatedly violated by federal judges. They knew the allegations were true, and refused to allow the information and evidence to be presented formally to the court. If the information was not true, and the judges were not interested in a cover-up, they could have simply allowed the information to be presented and have it disproved. These judicial acts, refusing to comply with a judge's administrative duties, constituted obstruction of justice, and were felonies.

Federal lawsuits seeking to report corrupt and criminal activities in key government offices were repeatedly blocked by federal judges, some of whom even inflicted great harm upon a former federal agent seeking to make such reports.

 In the first two lawsuits, district court and court of appeal judges sympathized with the matters Stich brought to their attention, but claimed these matters were the responsibility of Congress. By refusing to act, the pattern of air safety and criminal violations continued, and the expected crashes continued to occur, more brutal than in the past.

Deadly Effects of Judicial Corruption on 9/11

The most recent harms inflicted upon the United States that were made possible by the judicial misconduct occurred on September 11, 2001. The existing conditions that enabled hijackers to seize four airliners existed because of the corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, and to a lesser extent the corruption in the intelligence gathering offices. Federal judges repeatedly blocked federal agents from reporting this corruption that was being attempted via the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.

Combining Obstruction of Justice
With Civil Rights Violations

 Federal judges repeatedly issued orders, inflicting great personal and financial harm, upon former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to halt his exposure of criminal activities in key government offices. These judicial acts violated dozens of state and federal laws and then blocked every procedural due process defense. The effects? Deadly consequences in numerous areas, including the one-day's consequences in the aviation area--3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001.

One of several tactics used by a string of federal judges to block that former government agent from reporting the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute was to issue unlawful and unconstitutional injunctive orders barring him for the remainder of his life from filing any papers in the district and appellate courts.

Using that tactic, the agent was unable to report the criminal activities and unable to defend against the parallel legal efforts to silence him through sham lawsuits filed by CIA-front law firms, and other cooperating lawyers, all knowing they were blocking the reports that were inflicting great harm upon America's national interests, including national security.

Seizing Assets that Funded Exposure of Criminal Activities

Included in the judicial tactics to permanently silence former federal agent Rodney Stich were the following:

Prison for Reporting Criminal Activities

The success of four groups of hijackers to seize four airliners on September 11, 2001, was obviously due to "problems" within the government's aviation safety offices that had the responsibility to order preventative measures for the 50 years of easily preventable airliner hijackings. These "problems," which federal aviation safety agent Rodney Stich called deep-seated corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, were documented while Stich was a government aviation safety agent, while he acted as an independent counsel, and from the reports of other government aviation safety agents.

Stich first attempted to report this corruption to federal judges in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The reports were made under the federal crime reporting statute and the statute that permits any citizen to seek a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful conduct.

These early attempts to report the criminal acts were blocked by federal district and appellate judges, despite their acknowledgement that the charges were very serious. The refusal to receive the reports was followed by even worst aviation disasters that were caused or enabled by the corruption that Stich and other federal safety agents sought to report.

The former federal agent, concerned by the enormous loss of life resulting from the arrogance and corruption in government offices, then used his considerable assets to publish books, appearing on radio and television shows throughout the United States, giving lectures, and continuing his investigative work.

This publicity caused other government agents to contact Stich and provide him with information and evidence on other areas of corrupt and criminal activities that were inflicting great harm upon the people and upon major national interests, including national security.

Commencing in 1986, Stich attempted to report these additional criminal activities to a federal judge, under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute and the right of any citizen to seek a court order halting such misconduct. Federal judges continued their prior blocks, and then compounded this obstruction of justice with financial sanctions and orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in the federal courts. The harmful consequences knowingly continued to be inflicted upon American interests. 

Final Lawsuit--Prior to 9/11--Reporting Corruption
Enabling 9/11 Hijackings of Four Airliners

In 1999, former federal agent Rodney Stich filed a lawsuit in the U.S. district court at Reno, Nevada, that stated several major federal causes of actions. These included:

Post 9/11 Judicial Cover-Ups:
Setting Up For More Consequences

In June 2002, Stich filed another lawsuit in the U.S. district court at Washington, D.C. (MS Word) (Adobe pdf) That lawsuit attempting to report the criminal activities that  made possible the crashing of a hijacked aircraft into the Pentagon on 9-11, was dismissed by Judge Henry Kennedy without notice within two weeks of being filed.

He dismissed and blocked the reporting of criminal activities that played a role in the crashing of a jetliner into the Pentagon on the basis of an unlawful and unconstitutional injunctive order issued in 1991 by U.S. district judge Stanley Sporkin that permanently barred Stich from access to the federal courts. That order blocked Stich from reporting the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, and permanently terminated Stich's legal and constitutional defenses against the numerous violations of federally protected rights that were part of the judicial schemes to halt Stich's exposure activities.

Stich filed a notice of appeal, which the District of Columbia appellate judges promptly dismissed, denying Stich appellate remedies. This violation of due process by the court considered the most important below the U.S. Supreme Court, covered up for the criminal acts, covered up for the felony obstruction of justice by federal judges and others, and approved the massive violations of civil and constitutional rights that were part of the criminal scheme to block the exposure of vast criminal activities in government offices.

Continuing Judicial Cover-ups
Where 9/11 Lawsuits Were Filed

In August 2002, Stich submitted a lawsuit for filing in the U.S. district court for the Southern District of New York at New York City,  for the primary purpose of reporting and providing evidence of the criminal activities that caused the conditions that encouraged and insured the success of hijackers on September 11, 2001. That lawsuit was received on August 13, 2002, but the requirement to promptly file it was violated. Instead, the lawsuit was filed over a year later, on September 22, 2003. On that same date, Judge Mukasey issued a five-page order dismissing the lawsuit. The complexity of that order required many days of preparation, providing still more evidence of the judicial determination that the evidence of criminal activities and the judicial complicity in coverup crimes never be exposed.

Federal due process law prevents dismissal of a lawsuit under various safeguards, including:

Reason for Using Federal Courts
To Report Criminal Activities

Members of Congress and Justice Department personnel had previously refused to receive the evidence that Stich and his group of other government agents had sought to report, leaving the federal crime reporting statute and the requirement to report the crimes to a federal court as the only remaining means to make such reports. By blocking Stich's access to federal court, all avenues for reporting these crimes were blocked. 

 

 

Quick Overview

Since 1986, Stich and a group of other government agents sought to report other criminal activities to federal judges, including evidence of CIA drug smuggling, massive corruption in the bankruptcy courts, and other criminal activities as described in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies and in Drugging America. Judges repeated refused to receive the reports even though they had an administrative duty mandated by legislation to receive the reports and the evidence. The reports of criminal activities in key government offices and in the courts were submitted under the mandatory requirements of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4. This statute does not give any federal judge the option of blocking the reports.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). "Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.

The people who offered to provide evidence of criminal activities, through Stich, included agents of the FBI, DEA, Customs, Secret Service, CIA, including former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial proprietaries. Stich had extensive office provided by them, plus evidence related to the fraud behind certain airline crashes which he acquired while an air safety inspector responsible for air safety at the most senior program at United Airlines.

By refusing to receive this evidence, federal judges were aiding and abetting these criminal acts that had a deadly impact upon the lives of many people and which continued to inflict great harm upon the internal security of the United States. (Members of Congress and Justice Department personnel have also repeatedly refused to receive the evidence, helping to expose why the people in control of the system will never also these crimes to be exposed.)

Refusing to receive information and evidence of criminal activities, constitute obstruction of justice and are crimes under Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3, and 4.

Federal judges compounded these acts by rendering unlawful injunctive orders barring Stich (and his group of government whistleblowers) from access to the federal courts for the remainder of his life, which also voided the rights and protections guaranteed to him under the laws and Constitution of the United States.

In addition to misusing the federal courts to block the reporting of criminal activities, and in addition to rendering an injunction that unlawfully and unconstitutionally voided the most basic and all-important rights and protections under the form of government in the United States.

After Stich and his group of government agents discovered additional criminal activities in key government positions, Stich again sought to report these matters under the mandatory requirement of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, to a federal judge.

Justice Department prosecutors and federal judges then charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for filing his First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and rights under specific federal statutes, rules of court, and case law. It is a felony to retaliate against a former federal agent or witness for attempting to report federal crimes, under Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 111, 372, 1505, 1510, 1512, and 1513, among others.

Simultaneous with the injunctive orders, federal judges were rendering unlawful and unconstitutional orders that seized Stich’s $10 million in assets that Stich had used to fund his exposure of corruption and criminal activities (which federal judges repeatedly blocked from being reported). By rendering orders that barred Stich from federal court and constitutional and other legal remedies, Stich could not defend.

Stich’s assets were seized after he was forced to seek relief from hard-core civil right violations in Chapter 11 courts, seeking to force a federal judge to address the matters under the Declaratory Judgment Act and the Civil Rights Act. (These matters are detailed in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies and the recent Drugging America.

Additional orders were rendered after seizing Stich’s assets that barred him from filing any objections to the seizure and liquidation of his assets, which constituted further violations of major constitutional rights and protections.

When Stich did file objections, the objections were unfilled, and he was charged with criminal contempt of court for exercising constitutional due process. It is a felony for two or more people to retaliate against a person for having exercised constitutional due process.

The original attack upon Stich commenced with a sham lawsuit filed in the California courts by a San Francisco law firm identified by two reliable sources as a front for the CIA and FBI. That lawsuit was filed shortly after Stich’s second edition of Unfriendly Skies was released which named specific federal judges and Supreme Court justices as engaging in cover ups relating to the criminal matters related to a series of airline crashes. That lawsuit required California judges to act without personal and without subject matter jurisdiction, to violate many state and federal laws that barred that action, and violated landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions, federal statutes, and constitutional protections under Article IV, Section 1 and 2, and every protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.

After Stich unexpectedly exercised the protections in federal courts under the Civil Rights Act (for the civil rights violations perpetrated under color of state law) and under the Declaratory Judgment Act to declare valid the personal and property rights already adjudicated 20 years earlier and established in seven judgments located in various states, federal judges then had to enlarge on the violations to protect the scheme and the parties who participated in the scheme. That scheme initiated by the CIA-front law firm required that California judges violate dozens of state and federal laws, which were then repeated and enlarged upon by a succession of federal judges.

Eventually justices of the U.S. Supreme Court became implicated as they were officially notified of the civil rights violations and obstruction of justice by judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities.

The evidence strongly indicates that a powerful force somewhere high in government was responsible for the original scheme, which had the power to control the corrupt acts of large numbers of California and federal judges.

List of print and e-books, written by and with the input of dozens of government agents and others insiders, detail and document decades of corrupt activities that continue to inflict great harm upon the people and the country.

Free book segments. For a listing of the books written by former government insiders on the continuing history of corrupt activities responsible for a continuing series of human tragedies, and to download at no charge segments of each of the books.

Email address for the author and activist against corruption in government: stich@unfriendlyskies.com.

For more information relating to the author and his activities put "Rodney Stich" into a search engine such as Google or yahoo.com. The links run into many tens of thousands.

Download DVD videos from amazon to rent or to buy, onto your Windows XP operation system computer. For more information, click here.

To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link:

 

Cellphone and service deal from amazon.com, with 30-day return if not satisfied.

 

Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts.

 

 

 

Return to:

www.defraudingamerica.com

www.druggingamerica.com

www.unfriendlyskies.com

www.defraudingamericablog.com