Powerful Ammunition to
Fight Corrupt Judges
Former federal investigator and crusader against corrupt government personnel Rodney Stich has filed various lawsuits in federal courts over the years that sought to report criminal activities in government offices to a federal court under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. These federal filings can be of unprecedented help to anyone or any group seeking to correct the arrogance and corruption in courts that not only inflict great personal and financial harm upon countless people but also subvert government institutions and national interests.
Examining these lawsuits will reveal the following:
- Corruption related to a series of aviation disasters discovered and revealed by federal air safety inspector Rodney Stich and other federal inspectors.
- Corruption in government related to the corrupt war on drugs.
Obstruction of Justice by Federal JudgesFederal judges repeatedly blocked former federal agents from reporting corrupt and criminal activities that were being reported through lawsuits filed under the federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4) that makes it a crime for anyone who knows of a federal crime not to promptly report it to a federal court (or other federal officer).
Implied in that statute, federal judges must receive any reports and offered evidence under the judge's administrative responsibilities. He or she has no discretion whether the reports and evidence are to be received or not; it must be received. However, this requirement was repeatedly violated by federal judges. They knew the allegations were true, and refused to allow the information and evidence to be presented formally to the court. If the information was not true, and the judges were not interested in a cover-up, they could have simply allowed the information to be presented and have it disproved. These judicial acts, refusing to comply with a judge's administrative duties, constituted obstruction of justice, and were felonies.
Federal lawsuits seeking to report corrupt and criminal activities in key government offices were repeatedly blocked by federal judges, some of whom even inflicted great harm upon a former federal agent seeking to make such reports.
In the first two lawsuits, district court and court of appeal judges sympathized with the matters Stich brought to their attention, but claimed these matters were the responsibility of Congress. By refusing to act, the pattern of air safety and criminal violations continued, and the expected crashes continued to occur, more brutal than in the past.
Deadly Effects of Judicial Corruption on 9/11
The most recent harms inflicted upon the United States that were made possible by the judicial misconduct occurred on September 11, 2001. The existing conditions that enabled hijackers to seize four airliners existed because of the corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, and to a lesser extent the corruption in the intelligence gathering offices. Federal judges repeatedly blocked federal agents from reporting this corruption that was being attempted via the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.
Combining Obstruction of JusticeFederal judges repeatedly issued orders, inflicting great personal and financial harm, upon former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to halt his exposure of criminal activities in key government offices. These judicial acts violated dozens of state and federal laws and then blocked every procedural due process defense. The effects? Deadly consequences in numerous areas, including the one-day's consequences in the aviation area--3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001.
With Civil Rights Violations
One of several tactics used by a string of federal judges to block that former government agent from reporting the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute was to issue unlawful and unconstitutional injunctive orders barring him for the remainder of his life from filing any papers in the district and appellate courts.
Using that tactic, the agent was unable to report the criminal activities and unable to defend against the parallel legal efforts to silence him through sham lawsuits filed by CIA-front law firms, and other cooperating lawyers, all knowing they were blocking the reports that were inflicting great harm upon America's national interests, including national security.
Seizing Assets that Funded Exposure of Criminal Activities
Included in the judicial tactics to permanently silence former federal agent Rodney Stich were the following:
Dismiss every legal filing in which the former government agent sought to report the criminal activities to a federal court under the federal crime reporting statute.
Render orders taking and liquidating his life's assets consisting of $10 million in real estate that funded his exposure of corrupt and criminal acts in judicial and other government offices.
Charging him with criminal contempt of court when he filed papers in federal court to report the criminal activities that he and his group of other former government agents had discovered.
Charging him with criminal contempt of court when he filed objections to the seizure and liquidation of his life's assets.
Sentencing him to federal prison, nearing 70 years of age, shortly after receiving multiple-bypass open heart surgery, for attempting to report the criminal activities--including those that would later result in 3,000 deaths on a single morning.
Using a CIA-front law firm (Friedman, Sloan and Ross--San Francisco) to file a sham lawsuit against him to destroy the assets that funded his exposure activities, which was barred by large numbers of state and federal laws.
Obtaining the cooperation of California judges to violate those state and federal laws barring the sham lawsuit, and to block every state procedural defense against the record-setting violations.
When Stich exercised federal defenses for the violations of federally protected rights, federal judges:
Dismissed every filing, often immediately upon being filed, reversing the legal and common-sense definition of frivolous and placing a frivolous label on the exercise of federal defense remedies.
Rendering orders barring Stich access to federal courts, violating due process and equal protection rights.
Ordering Stich to pay huge financial sanctions for exercising federal defenses against the massive violations of federally protected rights.
Prison for Reporting Criminal Activities
The success of four groups of hijackers to seize four airliners on September 11, 2001, was obviously due to "problems" within the government's aviation safety offices that had the responsibility to order preventative measures for the 50 years of easily preventable airliner hijackings. These "problems," which federal aviation safety agent Rodney Stich called deep-seated corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, were documented while Stich was a government aviation safety agent, while he acted as an independent counsel, and from the reports of other government aviation safety agents.
Stich first attempted to report this corruption to federal judges in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The reports were made under the federal crime reporting statute and the statute that permits any citizen to seek a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful conduct.
These early attempts to report the criminal acts were blocked by federal district and appellate judges, despite their acknowledgement that the charges were very serious. The refusal to receive the reports was followed by even worst aviation disasters that were caused or enabled by the corruption that Stich and other federal safety agents sought to report.
The former federal agent, concerned by the enormous loss of life resulting from the arrogance and corruption in government offices, then used his considerable assets to publish books, appearing on radio and television shows throughout the United States, giving lectures, and continuing his investigative work.
This publicity caused other government agents to contact Stich and provide him with information and evidence on other areas of corrupt and criminal activities that were inflicting great harm upon the people and upon major national interests, including national security.
Commencing in 1986, Stich attempted to report these additional criminal activities to a federal judge, under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute and the right of any citizen to seek a court order halting such misconduct. Federal judges continued their prior blocks, and then compounded this obstruction of justice with financial sanctions and orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in the federal courts. The harmful consequences knowingly continued to be inflicted upon American interests.
Final Lawsuit--Prior to 9/11--Reporting Corruption
Enabling 9/11 Hijackings of Four Airliners
In 1999, former federal agent Rodney Stich filed a lawsuit in the U.S. district court at Reno, Nevada, that stated several major federal causes of actions. These included:
- Attempt to report criminal activities to a federal court under the two statutes that require and that permits such reports to be made.
- Lawsuits against federal judges and others who had blocked prior reports and who engaged in misconduct to retaliate against Stich, seeking to halt his exposure activities and to retaliate against him for his attempts to expose the crimes. These actions violated numerous federal laws which provided Stich federal defenses for which federal judges had a mandatory duty to provide a court forum and allow the lawsuits to proceed. The federal remedies permitting the lawsuits included the Civil Rights Act; Bivens; Civil RICO; Federal Tort Claims Act; and various other statutes and Supreme Court case law remedies.
- That lawsuit was unlawfully and unconstitutionally dismissed, Stich was ordered to pay sanctions for attempting to report the criminal activities and for exercising federal defenses against the massive onslaught of legal actions seeking to silence him.
- Ninth Circuit appellate judges refused to allow the appeal to be heard, stating that an order filed ten years earlier by U.S. district judge Marilyn Patel forever barred Stich access to federal court.
Post 9/11 Judicial Cover-Ups:
Setting Up For More Consequences
In June 2002, Stich filed another lawsuit in the U.S. district court at Washington, D.C. (MS Word) (Adobe pdf) That lawsuit attempting to report the criminal activities that made possible the crashing of a hijacked aircraft into the Pentagon on 9-11, was dismissed by Judge Henry Kennedy without notice within two weeks of being filed.
He dismissed and blocked the reporting of criminal activities that played a role in the crashing of a jetliner into the Pentagon on the basis of an unlawful and unconstitutional injunctive order issued in 1991 by U.S. district judge Stanley Sporkin that permanently barred Stich from access to the federal courts. That order blocked Stich from reporting the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, and permanently terminated Stich's legal and constitutional defenses against the numerous violations of federally protected rights that were part of the judicial schemes to halt Stich's exposure activities.
Stich filed a notice of appeal, which the District of Columbia appellate judges promptly dismissed, denying Stich appellate remedies. This violation of due process by the court considered the most important below the U.S. Supreme Court, covered up for the criminal acts, covered up for the felony obstruction of justice by federal judges and others, and approved the massive violations of civil and constitutional rights that were part of the criminal scheme to block the exposure of vast criminal activities in government offices.
Continuing Judicial Cover-ups
Where 9/11 Lawsuits Were Filed
In August 2002, Stich submitted a lawsuit for filing in the U.S. district court for the Southern District of New York at New York City, for the primary purpose of reporting and providing evidence of the criminal activities that caused the conditions that encouraged and insured the success of hijackers on September 11, 2001. That lawsuit was received on August 13, 2002, but the requirement to promptly file it was violated. Instead, the lawsuit was filed over a year later, on September 22, 2003. On that same date, Judge Mukasey issued a five-page order dismissing the lawsuit. The complexity of that order required many days of preparation, providing still more evidence of the judicial determination that the evidence of criminal activities and the judicial complicity in coverup crimes never be exposed.
Federal due process law prevents dismissal of a lawsuit under various safeguards, including:
- Preventing sua sponte dismissal without notifying the Plaintiff and permitting the Plaintiff to file objections to the dismissal.
- Requires that the charges made in the lawsuit be recognized as true for opposing dismissal, and if any of the charges state a federal cause of action, that lawsuit cannot be dismissed.
- Requires an opportunity for discovery.
- Requires a jury determination of facts when facts are a determining factor.
- Requires findings of facts and conclusions of law addressing each of the issues raised in the complaint.
- In that lawsuit, the federal crime report statute, and other criminal statutes, require that the federal judge receive the information and evidence as part of the judges administrative duties.
Reason for Using Federal Courts
To Report Criminal Activities
Members of Congress and Justice Department personnel had previously refused to receive the evidence that Stich and his group of other government agents had sought to report, leaving the federal crime reporting statute and the requirement to report the crimes to a federal court as the only remaining means to make such reports. By blocking Stich's access to federal court, all avenues for reporting these crimes were blocked.Viagra online available in various online pharmacies can be adopted to get back the normal sexual health once more at any age. Generic cialis is also a drug which is highly adopted for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. This drug unlike any online pharmacy other similar drug does not affect blood pressure of the patient under any circumstances and thus highly appreciated.
Since 1986, Stich and a group of other government agents sought to report other criminal activities to federal judges, including evidence of CIA drug smuggling, massive corruption in the bankruptcy courts, and other criminal activities as described in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies and in Drugging America. Judges repeated refused to receive the reports even though they had an administrative duty mandated by legislation to receive the reports and the evidence. The reports of criminal activities in key government offices and in the courts were submitted under the mandatory requirements of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4. This statute does not give any federal judge the option of blocking the reports.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). "Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.
The people who offered to provide evidence of criminal activities, through Stich, included agents of the FBI, DEA, Customs, Secret Service, CIA, including former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial proprietaries. Stich had extensive office provided by them, plus evidence related to the fraud behind certain airline crashes which he acquired while an air safety inspector responsible for air safety at the most senior program at United Airlines.
By refusing to receive this evidence, federal judges were aiding and abetting these criminal acts that had a deadly impact upon the lives of many people and which continued to inflict great harm upon the internal security of the United States. (Members of Congress and Justice Department personnel have also repeatedly refused to receive the evidence, helping to expose why the people in control of the system will never also these crimes to be exposed.)
Refusing to receive information and evidence of criminal activities, constitute obstruction of justice and are crimes under Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3, and 4.
Federal judges compounded these acts by rendering unlawful injunctive orders barring Stich (and his group of government whistleblowers) from access to the federal courts for the remainder of his life, which also voided the rights and protections guaranteed to him under the laws and Constitution of the United States.
In addition to misusing the federal courts to block the reporting of criminal activities, and in addition to rendering an injunction that unlawfully and unconstitutionally voided the most basic and all-important rights and protections under the form of government in the United States.
After Stich and his group of government agents discovered additional criminal activities in key government positions, Stich again sought to report these matters under the mandatory requirement of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, to a federal judge.
Justice Department prosecutors and federal judges then charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for filing his First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and rights under specific federal statutes, rules of court, and case law. It is a felony to retaliate against a former federal agent or witness for attempting to report federal crimes, under Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 111, 372, 1505, 1510, 1512, and 1513, among others.
Simultaneous with the injunctive orders, federal judges were rendering unlawful and unconstitutional orders that seized Stich’s $10 million in assets that Stich had used to fund his exposure of corruption and criminal activities (which federal judges repeatedly blocked from being reported). By rendering orders that barred Stich from federal court and constitutional and other legal remedies, Stich could not defend.
Stich’s assets were seized after he was forced to seek relief from hard-core civil right violations in Chapter 11 courts, seeking to force a federal judge to address the matters under the Declaratory Judgment Act and the Civil Rights Act. (These matters are detailed in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies and the recent Drugging America.
Additional orders were rendered after seizing Stich’s assets that barred him from filing any objections to the seizure and liquidation of his assets, which constituted further violations of major constitutional rights and protections.
When Stich did file objections, the objections were unfilled, and he was charged with criminal contempt of court for exercising constitutional due process. It is a felony for two or more people to retaliate against a person for having exercised constitutional due process.
The original attack upon Stich commenced with a sham lawsuit filed in the California courts by a San Francisco law firm identified by two reliable sources as a front for the CIA and FBI. That lawsuit was filed shortly after Stich’s second edition of Unfriendly Skies was released which named specific federal judges and Supreme Court justices as engaging in cover ups relating to the criminal matters related to a series of airline crashes. That lawsuit required California judges to act without personal and without subject matter jurisdiction, to violate many state and federal laws that barred that action, and violated landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions, federal statutes, and constitutional protections under Article IV, Section 1 and 2, and every protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.
After Stich unexpectedly exercised the protections in federal courts under the Civil Rights Act (for the civil rights violations perpetrated under color of state law) and under the Declaratory Judgment Act to declare valid the personal and property rights already adjudicated 20 years earlier and established in seven judgments located in various states, federal judges then had to enlarge on the violations to protect the scheme and the parties who participated in the scheme. That scheme initiated by the CIA-front law firm required that California judges violate dozens of state and federal laws, which were then repeated and enlarged upon by a succession of federal judges.
Eventually justices of the U.S. Supreme Court became implicated as they were officially notified of the civil rights violations and obstruction of justice by judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities.
The evidence strongly indicates that a powerful force somewhere high in government was responsible for the original scheme, which had the power to control the corrupt acts of large numbers of California and federal judges.
Sampling of Consequences Prior, During, and Subsequent to Legal,
Judicial and Justice Department Attacks on Whistleblower
Harm to the American public in non-violent areas.
Harm to the few people in the United States fighting the high-level corruption in a meaningful manner.
Harm inflicted on former federal agent and whistleblower during multiple schemes to silence him.
Sampling of Early Consequences
TWA Flight 800
U.S. Embassy Bombings
9/11 Easily-Preventable Multiple Hijackings
These few examples of the horrors associated with airline disasters enabled to occur by documented corruption withheld from the American people. The standard culture of cover-ups in the United States enabled the corruption, cover-ups, to mutate into different areas. In the aviation area, although the continuing series of airline disasters eventually came to a halt for other reasons, the culture continued, and enabled to occur a number of easily preventable airline disasters. The inbred culture created the conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to easily hijack four airliners within a few hours of each other and kill nearly 3,000 people.
One of Over 200 Victims Choosing This Way to Die—
Made Possible by Many Enablers in United States
Consequences of Corruption, Cover-Ups, And
Retaliation Felonies Not Limited to Aviation
There were many other forms of victims from the systemic high-level corruption. These included for instance victims of the:
Department of Justice prosecutorial misconduct, people being falsely charges with crimes in order to improve the prosecutors' career.
The explosion of violent crime related to drug smuggling into the United States, in which CIA assets were major players.
Series of financial frauds appearing every few years, with the latest housing and financial implosions surfacing in 2008.
Seizure of assets from innocent people.
And many other forms.
These offenses are described in the books written by insiders.
Corruption of the Type Described at this site does not occur in a vacuum. High-level corruption in one area is simply one tentacle of a widespread culture of corruption. And the consequences of that corruption−and the endemic cover-ups−have consequences in other areas. The culture of corruption affects the people and the nation in many other ways, That includes the latest series of financial frauds that has occurred in the housing and financial sectors. Also, the effect of the endemic corruption and endemic cover-ups−major parts of the culture in the United States−that enablers successful terrorist attacks upon U.S. interests.
Harm to People Overseas From Culture Of
High-Level Corruption and Lies in the United States
In addition to the decades of harm resulting from the systemic corruption of key people and groups in the U.S. government, affecting aviation safety, financial, human rights, in the United States, there is the harm from outside sources brought about by the actions of U.S. politicians affecting people in other countries—such as the history of invading and killing foreigners—there are the successful "terrorist" attacks made possible by high-level corruption, and then there are the foreigners who are also victims from the same high-level corruption that adversely affects the American, but in a different form.
Remains of a girl—about the age of the 9-year-old Killed in Tucson in January 2011.
In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences.
Suggestion to people outside the United States. Become familiar with the documented systemic corruption in the United States and show the outrage lacking of people in the United States, and:
Help expose the endemic corruption that seem to be acceptable to the American people, and maybe wake them up.
Help to protect yourselves against the decades of ham inflicted upon people of other countries by the actions of U.S. politicians—supported by much of the American public. Examples:
Serial lying by U.S. politicians to use as a pretense to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, killing tens of thousands of innocent people.
U.S. politicians shifting enabling blame from their own corrupt actions that encouraged and enabled four groups of terrorists to simultaneously hijack four airliners, and shift the blame to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan—with the help of a dumbed-down American public that is mostly too lazy to learn the truth.
Books by Unprecedented Number of Professional
Insiders on Multiple Areas of Corruption
And Catastrophic Consequences
All of the books are available at amazon.com, in print and on the Kindle, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich
Sampling of early books reviews
Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.
More information about these books by clicking here.
Thanks to the Very Few Who Cared Enough
Thanks are given to those very very few who have contributed funds to the non-profit organization that helps to fund these exposure activities.
Among the "Least" Guilty of the Enablers
Euphoric Blissful Ignorance−Enablers of Great American Tragedies
Make Your Own Blog or Internet Site:
Easy and Inexpensive
Get your own blog site, domain name, or hosting site at the popular godaddy.com hosting service.
A low-cost provider with excellent support service. Click on the following graphic for information
and quick start.