Ammunition tos fight corrupt judges

<body> <p><HTML></p> <p><HEAD></p> <p><TITLE>Unprecedented ammunition for fighting corruption throughout government offices and government operations.</TITLE></p> <p><META NAME="keywords" CONTENT="corruption, government corruption, CIA, DEA, DOJ, FBI, congress, members of Congress"></p> <p><META NAME="description" CONTENTS="This site provides documented information that good courageous people could use to fight the culture of corruption in government offices that continues to inflict grave harm upon innocent people and upon the United States."></p> <p><NOFRAMES></p> <p><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"></p> <b> <blockquote> <blockquote> <blockquote> <blockquote> <h3 ALIGN="CENTER"><font color="#FF0000" size="6">Powerful Ammunition to <br> Fight Corrupt Judges</font></h3> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p><font size="4">Former federal investigator and crusader against corrupt government personnel Rodney Stich has filed various lawsuits in federal courts over the years that sought to report criminal activities in government offices to a federal court under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. </font><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">§ 4. These federal filings can be of unprecedented help to anyone or any group seeking to correct the arrogance and corruption in courts that not only inflict great personal and financial harm upon countless people but also subvert government institutions and national interests.</font></p> <p><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Examining these lawsuits will <u>reveal the following</u>:</font></p> <ul> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Detailed description of a literal Trojan horse type corruption in government offices including people perpetrating the crimes and people feloniously covering up for them. The  criminal activities described in these pages and in <a target="_top" href="https://www.defraudingamerica.com/order_form.html">books</a> written by former government agents include:</font></li> </ul> <blockquote> <ul> <li><u><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">Corruption related to a series of aviation disasters</font></u><font size="4" face="Times New Roman"> discovered and revealed by federal air safety inspector Rodney Stich and other federal inspectors.  </font></li> </ul> <ul> <li><u><font size="4">Corruption in government related to the corrupt war on drugs</font></u><font size="4">.  </font></li> </ul> <ul> <li><font size="4">Pattern of other criminal and subversive activities, as detailed in <i><a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/">Defrauding America</a></i>, <i><a target="_top" href="http://www.druggingamerica.com/">Drugging America</a></i>, <i>Terrorism Against America</i>.<br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">Criminal cover-ups of these crimes by key people in the three branches of the federal government.</font></li> </ul> </blockquote> <blockquote> <blockquote><hr> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Obstruction of Justice by Federal Judges">Obstruction of Justice by Federal Judges</a></font></p> <p><u> <a href="http://www.DefraudingAmerica.com/list_of_federal_judges.html" style="text-decoration: none"> <font size="4">Federal judges</font></a></u><font size="4"> repeatedly blocked former federal agents from reporting corrupt and criminal activities that were being reported through lawsuits filed under the <a href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/crime_reporting_statute.html" target="_top">federal crime reporting statute</a> (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4) that makes it a crime for anyone who knows of a federal crime not to promptly report it to a federal court (or other federal officer). </font> </p> <p><font size="4">Implied in that statute, federal judges must receive any reports and offered evidence under the judge's administrative responsibilities. He or she has no discretion whether the reports and evidence are to be received or not; it must be received. However, this requirement was repeatedly violated by federal judges. They knew the allegations were true, and refused to allow the information and evidence to be presented formally to the court. If the information was not true, and the judges were not interested in a cover-up, they could have simply allowed the information to be presented and have it disproved. These judicial acts, refusing to comply with a judge's administrative duties, constituted obstruction of justice, and were <a href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/obstructing_justice_statutes.html" target="_top">felonies</a>.</font></p> <p> <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_list.html"> <font size="4">Federal lawsuits</font></a><font size="4"> seeking to report corrupt and criminal activities in key government offices were repeatedly blocked by <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/federal_judges_implicated.html">federal judges</a>, some of whom even inflicted great harm upon a former federal agent seeking to make such reports.</font></p> <p><font size="4"> <font face="Courier New">I</font>n the first two lawsuits, district court and court of appeal judges <u>sympathized with the matters Stich brought to their attention, but claimed these matters were the responsibility of Congress</u>. By refusing to act, the pattern of air safety and criminal violations continued, and the expected crashes continued to occur, more brutal than in the past.</font></p><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4">Deadly <a name="Effects of Judicial Corruption on 9-11">Effects of Judicial Corruption on 9/11 </a></font></p> <p><font size="4">The most recent harms inflicted upon the United States that were made possible by the judicial misconduct occurred on September 11, 2001. The existing conditions that enabled hijackers to seize four airliners existed because of the corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, and to a lesser extent the corruption in the intelligence gathering offices. Federal judges repeatedly blocked federal agents from reporting this corruption that was being attempted via the <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/crime_reporting_statute.html">federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. <font face="Abadi MT Condensed Light">§ 4</font></a></font><font size="4" face="Abadi MT Condensed Light">.</font></p> <hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Combining Obstruction of Justice with Record-Setting Civil Rights Violations">Combining Obstruction of Justice with Record-Setting Civil Rights Violations</a></font></p> <p> <font size="4">Federal judges repeatedly issued orders, inflicting great personal and financial harm, upon former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to halt his exposure of criminal activities in key government offices. These judicial acts violated dozens of state and <a href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/violations_state_federal_laws.html">federal laws</a> and then blocked every procedural due process defense. The effects? Deadly consequences in numerous areas, including the one-day's consequences in the aviation area--3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001.<br><br>One of several tactics used by a string of federal judges to block that former government agent from reporting the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute was to issue unlawful and unconstitutional <a href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/injunctive_orders.html">injunctive orders</a> barring him for the remainder of his life from filing any papers in the district and appellate courts. </font> </p> <p><font size="4">Using that tactic, the agent was unable to report the criminal activities and unable to defend against the parallel legal efforts to silence him through sham lawsuits filed by CIA-front law firms, and other cooperating lawyers, all knowing they were blocking the reports that were inflicting great harm upon America's national interests, including national security.</font></p><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000"> <a name="Taking Assets that Funded Exposure of Criminal Activities"> <font size="4">Taking Assets that Funded Exposure of Criminal Activities</font></a></font><a name="Taking Assets that Funded Exposure of Criminal Activities"><font size="4"> </font></a> <p align="left"><font size="4">Included in the judicial tactics to permanently silence former federal agent Rodney Stich were the following:</font><ul> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Dismiss every legal filing in which the former government agent sought to report the criminal activities to a federal court under the federal crime reporting statute.<br> </font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Render orders taking and liquidating his life's assets consisting of $10 million in real estate that funded his exposure of corrupt and criminal acts in judicial and other government offices. <br> </font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Charging him with criminal contempt of court when he filed papers in federal court to report the criminal activities that he and his group of other former government agents had discovered.<br> </font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Charging him with criminal contempt of court when he filed objections to the seizure and liquidation of his life's assets.<br> </font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Sentencing him to federal prison, nearing 70 years of age, shortly after receiving multiple-bypass  open heart surgery, for attempting to report the criminal activities--including those that would later result in 3,000 deaths on a single morning.<br> </font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Using a CIA-front law firm (Friedman, Sloan and Ross--San Francisco) to file a sham lawsuit against him to destroy the assets that funded his exposure activities, which was barred by <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/violations_by_california_federal_judges.html">large numbers of state and federal laws</a>.<br> </font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Obtaining the cooperation of California judges to violate those state and federal laws barring the sham lawsuit,  and to block every state procedural defense against the record-setting violations.</font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">When Stich exercised federal defenses for the violations of federally protected rights, federal judges:<br> </font><ul> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Dismissed every filing, often immediately upon being filed, reversing the legal and common-sense definition of frivolous and placing a frivolous label on the exercise of federal defense remedies.<br> </font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Rendering orders barring Stich access to federal courts, violating due process and equal protection rights.<br> </font></li> <li> <p align="left"><font size="4">Ordering Stich to pay huge financial sanctions for exercising federal defenses against the massive violations of federally protected rights.</font></li> </ul></li> </ul><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000"> <a name="Prison for Attempting to Report Criminal Activities"> <font size="4">Prison for Attempting to Report Criminal Activities</font></a><font size="4"> That <br>Played Key Roles in the Catastrophic Events of September 11, 2001</font></font><font size="4">  </font> <p align="left"><font size="4">The success of four groups of hijackers to seize four airliners on September 11, 2001, was obviously due to "problems" within the government's aviation safety offices that had the responsibility to order preventative measures for the 50 years of easily preventable airliner hijackings. These "problems," which federal aviation safety agent Rodney Stich called deep-seated corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, were documented while Stich was a government aviation safety agent, while he acted as an independent counsel, and from the reports of other government aviation safety agents.</font><p align="left"> <font size="4">Stich first attempted to <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/faa_ntsb_lawsuits.html">report this corruption to federal judges</a> in the late 1970s and early 1980s. The reports were made under the <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/crime_reporting_statute.html">federal crime reporting statute</a> and the <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/title_28_usc_1361.html">statute that permits any citizen to seek a court order</a> requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful conduct.</font><p align="left"> <font size="4">These early attempts to report the criminal acts were blocked by federal district and appellate judges, despite their acknowledgement that the charges were very serious. The refusal to receive the reports was followed by even worst aviation disasters that were caused or enabled by the corruption that Stich and other federal safety agents sought to report.</font><p align="left"> <font size="4">The former federal agent, concerned by the enormous loss of life resulting from the arrogance and corruption in government offices, then used his <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/assets.html">considerable assets</a> to publish books, appearing on radio and television shows throughout the United States, giving lectures, and continuing his investigative work. </font> <p align="left"><font size="4">This publicity caused <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/witness_list.html">other government agents</a> to contact Stich and provide him with information and evidence on other areas of <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/criminal_activities.html">corrupt and criminal activities</a> that were inflicting great harm upon the people and upon major national interests, including national security.</font><p align="left"><font size="4">Commencing in 1986, Stich attempted to report these additional criminal activities to a federal judge, under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute and the right of any citizen to seek a court order halting such misconduct. Federal judges continued their prior blocks, and then compounded this obstruction of justice with financial sanctions and orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in the federal courts. The harmful consequences knowingly continued to be inflicted upon American interests. </font><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Final Lawsuit--Prior to 911--Seeking to Report Corruption">Final Lawsuit--Prior to 9/11--Seeking to Report Corruption</a> Enabling Hijackings of Four Airliners, and Suing Federal Judges Who Previously Blocked the Reports</font></p> <p><font size="4">In 1999, former federal agent Rodney Stich filed a <a href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_reno.html" target="_top">lawsuit</a> in the U.S. district court at Reno, Nevada, that stated several major federal causes of actions. These included:</font></p> <ul> <li><font size="4">Attempt to report criminal activities to a federal court under the two statutes that require and that permits such reports to be made.<br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">Lawsuits against federal judges and others who had blocked prior reports and who engaged in misconduct to retaliate against Stich, seeking to halt his exposure activities and to retaliate against him for his attempts to expose the crimes. These actions violated numerous federal laws which provided  Stich federal defenses for which federal judges had a mandatory duty to provide a court forum and allow the lawsuits to proceed. The federal remedies permitting the lawsuits included the <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/civil_rights_act.html">Civil Rights Act</a></font><font size="4" face="Abadi MT Condensed Light">; <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/bivens.html">Bivens</a></i>; <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/rico.html">Civil RICO</a>; <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/ftca.html">Federal Tort Claims Act</a>; and various other statutes and Supreme Court case law remedies.<br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">That lawsuit was unlawfully and unconstitutionally dismissed, Stich was ordered to pay sanctions for attempting to report the criminal activities and for exercising federal defenses against the massive onslaught of legal actions seeking to silence him. <br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">Ninth Circuit appellate judges refused to allow the appeal to be heard, stating that an order filed ten years earlier by U.S. district judge Marilyn Patel forever barred Stich access to federal court.</font></li> </ul><hr> <p align="center"><u><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Post 9-11 Judicial Blocks, Despite the Catastrophic Consequences of Coverups">Post 9/11 Judicial Blocks, Despite the Catastrophic Consequences of Coverups</a></font></u></p> <p><font size="4">In June 2002, Stich filed another lawsuit in the U.S. district court at Washington, D.C. (<a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_dca_june2002.doc">MS Word</a>) (<a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_dca_june2002.pdf">Adobe pdf</a>) That lawsuit attempting to report the criminal activities that  made possible the crashing of a hijacked aircraft into the Pentagon on 9-11, was dismissed by Judge Henry Kennedy without notice within two weeks of being filed. </font></p> <p><font size="4">He dismissed and blocked the reporting of criminal activities that played a role in the crashing of a jetliner into the Pentagon on the basis of an unlawful and unconstitutional injunctive order issued in 1991 by U.S. district judge Stanley Sporkin that permanently barred Stich from access to the federal courts. That order blocked Stich from reporting the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, and permanently terminated Stich's legal and constitutional defenses against the numerous violations of federally protected rights that were part of the judicial schemes to halt Stich's exposure activities. </font></p> <p><font size="4">Stich filed a <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/notice_appeal_brief_dca.html">notice of appeal</a>, which the District of Columbia appellate judges promptly dismissed, denying Stich appellate remedies. This violation of due process by the court considered the most important below the U.S. Supreme Court, covered up for the criminal acts, covered up for the felony obstruction of justice by federal judges and others, and approved the massive violations of civil and constitutional rights that were part of the criminal scheme to block the exposure of vast criminal activities in government offices.</font></p><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Continuing Judicial Coverups Where 9-11 Lawsuits Were Filed">Continuing Judicial Cover-ups Where 9/11 Lawsuits Were Filed</a></font></p> <p><font size="4">In August 2002, Stich submitted a lawsuit for filing in the U.S. district court for the Southern District of New York at New York City,  for the primary purpose of reporting and providing evidence of the criminal activities that caused the conditions that encouraged and insured the success of hijackers on September 11, 2001. That lawsuit was received on August 13, 2002, but the requirement to promptly file it was violated. Instead, the lawsuit was filed over a year later, on September 22, 2003. On that same date, <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/dismissal_order_mukasey.pdf">Judge Mukasey issued a five-page order</a> dismissing the lawsuit. The complexity of that order required many days of preparation, providing still more evidence of the judicial determination that the evidence of criminal activities and the judicial complicity in coverup crimes never be exposed. </font></p> <p><font size="4">Federal <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/due_process_safeguards.html">due process law prevents dismissal of a lawsuit</a> under various safeguards, including:</font></p> <ul> <li><font size="4">Preventing <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sua_sponte_dismissal.html">sua sponte dismissal</a> without notifying the Plaintiff and permitting the Plaintiff to file objections to the dismissal.<br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">Requires that the <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/charges_as_true.html">charges made in the lawsuit be recognized as true</a> for opposing dismissal, and if any of the charges state a federal cause of action, that lawsuit cannot be dismissed.<br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">Requires an <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/discovery.html">opportunity for discovery</a>.<br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">Requires a <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/jury_right.html">jury determination of facts</a> when facts are a determining factor.<br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">Requires <a target="_top" href="findings_of_fact_conclusions_of_law.html">findings of facts and conclusions of law</a> addressing each of the  issues raised in the complaint.<br> </font></li> <li><font size="4">In that lawsuit, the <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/crime_reporting_statute.html">federal crime report statute</a>, and other criminal statutes, require that the federal judge receive the information and evidence as part of the judges <i>administrative</i> duties.</font></li> </ul><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Reason for Using Federal Courts to Report Criminal Activities">Reason for Using Federal Courts to Report Criminal Activities</a></font></p> <p><font size="4">Members of Congress and Justice Department personnel had previously refused to receive the evidence that Stich and his group of other government agents had sought to report, leaving the federal crime reporting statute and the requirement to report the crimes to a federal court as the only remaining means to make such reports. By blocking Stich's access to federal court, all avenues for reporting these crimes were blocked.</font></p><hr> <p align="center"><u><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Quick Overview">Quick Overview</a></font></u></p> <p><font size="4">Since 1986, Stich and a group of other <u>government agents sought to report other criminal activities to federal judges, including evidence of CIA drug smuggling, massive corruption in the bankruptcy courts, and other criminal activities</u> as described in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies and in Drugging America. Judges repeated refused to receive the reports even though they had an administrative duty mandated by legislation to receive the reports and the evidence. The reports of criminal activities in key government offices and in the courts were submitted under the mandatory requirements of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4. This statute does not give any federal judge the option of blocking the reports.</font></p> <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font size="4">Title 18 U.S.C. <font face="Times New Roman">§</font> 4 (misprision of felony). <font face="WP TypographicSymbols">"</font>Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.</font><font size="4" face="WP TypographicSymbols">"</font></p> <blockquote> <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font FACE="Times New Roman" size="4">Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.</font></p> </blockquote> <p ALIGN="JUSTIFY"><font size="4">The people who offered to provide <u>evidence of criminal activities, through Stich, included agents of the FBI, DEA, Customs, Secret Service, CIA, including former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial proprietaries</u>. Stich had extensive office provided by them, plus evidence related to the fraud behind certain airline crashes which he acquired while an air safety inspector responsible for air safety at the most senior program at United Airlines.</font></p> <p><font size="4">By refusing to receive this evidence, <u>federal judges were aiding and abetting these criminal acts</u> that had a deadly impact upon the lives of many people and which continued to inflict great harm upon the internal security of the United States. (Members of Congress and Justice Department personnel have also repeatedly refused to receive the evidence, helping to expose why the people in control of the system will never also these crimes to be exposed.)</font></p> <p><font size="4">Refusing to receive information and evidence of criminal activities, constitute obstruction of justice and are crimes under <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/obstructing_justice_statutes.html">Title 18 U.S.C. Section 2, 3, and 4</a>.</font></p> <p><u><font size="4">Federal judges compounded these acts by rendering unlawful injunctive orders</font></u><font size="4"> barring Stich (and his group of government whistleblowers) from access to the federal courts for the remainder of his life, which also voided the rights and protections guaranteed to him under the laws and Constitution of the United States.</font></p> <p><font size="4">In addition to <u>misusing the federal courts to block the reporting of criminal activities</u>, and in addition to rendering an injunction that unlawfully and unconstitutionally voided the most basic and all-important rights and protections under the form of government in the United States.</font></p> <p><font size="4">After Stich and his group of government agents <u>discovered additional criminal activities in key government positions</u>, Stich again sought to report these matters under the mandatory requirement of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, to a federal judge.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Justice Department prosecutors and federal judges then <u>charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for filing his First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights</u>, and rights under specific federal statutes, rules of court, and case law. It is a felony to retaliate against a former federal agent or witness for attempting to report federal crimes, under Title 18 U.S.C. Sections 111, 372, 1505, 1510, 1512, and 1513, among others.</font></p> <p><u><font size="4">Simultaneous with the injunctive orders, federal judges were rendering unlawful and unconstitutional orders that seized Stich’s $10 million in assets</font></u><font size="4"> that Stich had used to fund his exposure of corruption and criminal activities (which federal judges repeatedly blocked from being reported). By rendering orders that barred Stich from federal court and constitutional and other legal remedies, Stich could not defend.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Stich’s <u>assets were seized after he was forced to seek relief from hard-core civil right violations in Chapter 11 courts</u>, seeking to force a federal judge to address the matters under the Declaratory Judgment Act and the Civil Rights Act. (These matters are detailed in the third editions of <i>Defrauding America</i> and <i>Unfriendly Skies</i> and the recent <i>Drugging America</i>.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Additional orders were rendered after seizing Stich’s assets that barred him from filing any objections to the seizure and liquidation of his assets, which constituted further violations of major constitutional rights and protections.</font></p> <p><font size="4">When Stich did file objections, the objections were unfilled, and he was charged with criminal contempt of court for exercising constitutional due process. It is a felony for two or more people to retaliate against a person for having exercised constitutional due process.</font></p> <p><font size="4">The <u>original attack upon Stich commenced with a <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sham_lawsuit.html">sham lawsuit</a> filed in the California courts by a San Francisco law firm</u> identified by two reliable sources as a front for the CIA and FBI. That lawsuit was filed shortly after Stich’s second edition of <i>Unfriendly Sk</i>ies was released which named specific federal judges and Supreme Court justices as engaging in cover ups relating to the criminal matters related to a series of airline crashes. That lawsuit required California judges to act without personal and without subject matter jurisdiction, to <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/violations_by_california_federal_judges.html">violate many state and federal laws</a> that barred that action, and violated landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions, federal statutes, and constitutional protections under Article IV, Section 1 and 2, and every protection under the Fourteenth Amendment.</font></p> <p><font size="4">After Stich <u>unexpectedly exercised the protections in federal courts under the Civil Rights Act (for the civil rights violations perpetrated under color of state law) and under the Declaratory Judgment Act</u> to declare valid the personal and property rights already adjudicated 20 years earlier and established in seven judgments located in various states, federal judges then had to enlarge on the violations to protect the scheme and the parties who participated in the scheme. That <u>s</u>cheme initiated by the CIA-front law firm required that California judges violate dozens of state and federal laws, which were then repeated and enlarged upon by a succession of federal judges.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Eventually <u>justices of the U.S. Supreme Court became implicated</u> as they were officially notified of the civil rights violations and obstruction of justice by judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities.</font></p> <p><font size="4">The evidence strongly indicates that a powerful force somewhere high in government was responsible for the original scheme, which had the power to control the corrupt acts of large numbers of California and federal judges.</font></p><hr> <p align="center"><u><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Related Web Sites and Information on Revealing Books">Related Web Sites and Information on Revealing Books</a></font></u></p> <ul> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chronology of decades of corrupt activities by the CIA, U.S. politicians, and other members of the system, as described in the book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com">Defrauding America</a></i>.</font></li> </ul> <ul> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chronology of the arrogant and corrupt war on drugs--against the American people--as described in the book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.druggingamerica.com">Drugging America</a></i>.<br> </font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chronology of arrogant and corrupt activities in the deadly politics of aviation safety, as described in the book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.unfriendlyskies.com">Unfriendly Skies</a></i>.<br> </font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chronology of covert and corrupt activities in which the American people suffered the consequences of blowback, as described in the e-book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.blowback911.com">Blowback, 9-11, Iraq, Lies, and Coverups</a></i>.<br> </font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Story of a CIA operation based in Honolulu and its titular head, who was made a scapegoat by CIA and Justice Department personnel and a federal judge, after its cover was blown, and as described in the e-book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.disavow.com">Disavow</a></i>.<br> </font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Site focusing on terrorism against America from Trojan-horse insiders and from outsiders, as described in the e-book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.terrorism-against-america.com">Terrorism Against America</a></i>.</font></li> </ul> <p> <a name="Informational print and e-books books" target="_top" href="https://www.defraudingamerica.com/order_form.html"> <font size="4">Informational print and e-books books</font></a><font size="4"> describing these matters.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Note: The books and other activities are non-profit, relying on funds obtained elsewhere, and arise out of the determination by Rodney Stich to provide this information to the public concerning unprecedented threats and sources of great harm to the United States, national security, and its people.</font></p><hr> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">Help fund our exposure activities by placing orders for <i>any</i> amazon.com products through our links. </font></p> <p> <iframe width="180" height="150" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" name="I1" src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=unfriendlskie-20&o=1&p=27&l=qs1&f=ifr"></iframe> </p> <p class="1Booktext" align="left"> </p> </blockquote> <p> </p> </b> <p> </p> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p> </p> <p><P> This website requires a browser that supports "frames".</p> <p></BODY></p> <p></NOFRAMES></p> <p></HTML></p> <p> </p> </body>