Years of High-Level Corruption
Notifications
To Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court
All of the following filings with the Justices of the U.S.
Supreme Court followed the attempts by federal airline safety inspector
Rodney
Stich to carry out the assignment to halt and correct the massive corruption
in the aviation safety requirements at United Airlines—and
the enablers in the Denver FAA offices—that
were resulting in a continuous series of fatal airline disasters. Corrupt
actions blocking Stich from carrying out the life-and-death assignments included
retaliation against him that continued for years. Seeking to report these
matters, and halt the attacks upon him, caused him to file a continuing series
of legal papers with the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Since 1978, former federal agent
Rodney Stich, seeking to circumvent
the standard cover-ups in government, sought to
report to federal judges, under the authority and requirement of the
federal crime reporting statute,
the corrupt and criminal activities that he
initially discovered as a key federal
aviation safety inspector-investigator that enabled to occur a series of
specific aviation crashes.
-
1975. September 27. Stich filed a federal action to report the corruption
and enabled aviation tragedies against the FAA.
www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuits_against_faa_ntsb.html. Federal action to report included information
on a series of airline disasters, enabling corruption by the FAA, cover-up by
employees of the U.S. Department of Justice. Department of Justice employees
filed papers claiming Stich had no standing to report the federal crimes. Anyone and
everyone had standing to report criminal acts relating to deadly catastrophic
effects under the rights and the obligations of citizen; and had a mandatory
responsibility under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4,
which states: Anyone …. Schnacke went along with the Department of Justice
employees obstruction of justice tactic. (Employees of U.S. Department of
Justice had previously covered up for the corrupt aviation safety actions at
United Airlines in the crash of an United Airlines DC-8 into New York City in
1960, and the corrupt perjury at a FAA hearing.
-
1975. (February) During
oral arguments before the U.S. Court
of Appeals, San Francisco, judges acknowledged the seriousness of the charges
and then stated it was a matter for Congress. I advised them that I had brought
these matters to members of Congress and encountered a stonewall cover-up.
Further, I stated that federal law requires that federal judges receive the
information of federal crimes, and that they then insure that the crimes be
investigated.
- 1977. Petition for
Writ of Certiorari to U.S.
Supreme Court. That petition put the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on
notice, under the federal crime reporting statute. That filing was the first of
many that put the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on notice of crimes
against the United States and the resulting deaths; and of the practice by
employees of the U.S. Department of Justice in cover-up and obstruction of
justice; and federal judges aiding and abetting these matters while
violating their responsibilities under the
federal crime reporting statute
to receive information on federal crimes.
Combination of Reporting Criminal Activities And
Judicial Retaliation for Reporting Them
Starting in 1986, a new phrase of
complicity by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. A succession of criminal
contempt of court charges confined Stich to his home pending trial for
attempting to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting
statute.
- As the former federal agent attempted to report
additional criminal activities, some of which were learned from information
provided by other former government agents and insiders, a series of schemes
were taken to halt his exposure activities. These schemes involved
federal judges,
Department of Justice prosecutors, and a hoard of
lawyers and law firms. These
tactics included, for instance:
- Issuing a series of unlawful and unconstitutional
orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in any federal
district or appellate court. Those orders knowingly blocked him and his
coalition from reporting the ongoing corruption of key government
personnel, and blocked him from seeking federal defenses against a
series of sham lawsuits that violated blocks of state and federal laws
and constituted federal causes of actions for which federal judges had
mandatory jurisdiction.
- Federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors
charging Stich within criminal contempt of court for exercising a
citizen's right, and a responsibility under the federal crime reporting
statute, for seeking to report additional high-level criminal
activities, and for seeking to halt the great harm from the sham
lawsuits.
- Federal judges and Department of Justice trustees
unlawfully and unconstitutionally seizing and liquidating the $10
million in assets that funded the exposure activities.
- Federal judges charging Stich with criminal contempt
of court for exercising the legal and constitutional right to file
objections to the unlawful and unconstitutional seizure and liquidation
of his life assets.
- All of these wrongful judicial and Department of Justice
acts, meeting the definition of a conspiracy, were taken to the U.S. Supreme
Court. The Justices of the Supreme Court continued their prior conduct of
aiding and abetting the conduct by refusing to provide any relief, even
though they had the legal responsibility to do so.
- Legal submissions to Supreme Court justices to halt
imprisonment of a former federal agent on a
criminal contempt of
court charge for attempting to report to a federal court−as
required by the federal crime
reporting statute−high-level ongoing
corruption relating to an ongoing series of tragic, deadly, and catastrophic
events. The issues included major violations of basic constitutional rights.
-
1988 petition seeking relief from the Justices of the Supreme
Court from the contempt of court sentence, Stich filed a petition for
emergency relief with the 9th Cir. for contempt of court sentence.
-
Sampling of 1991 Legal Filings
with U.S. Supreme Court seeking
relief from prison sentence for having reported continuing corruption
associated with resulting harm, consisting of criminal retaliation against a
former federal agent and witness. Relief denied.
-
Petition for relief from the third criminal contempt of court involving
San Francisco federal judges Marilyn Petal and Vaughn Walker. March 4, 1991.
-
March 4, 1991,
Petition for emergency relief to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking
relief from the continuation of criminal contempt of court charges for
attempting to report criminal activities to a federal court under the
federal crime reporting statute (and for exercising federal due process
remedies against record-setting violations of state and federal laws
initiated by a CIA-front law firm).
-
Petition sent to U.S. Supreme
Court Justice Byron White, October 1991.
-
October 28, 1991.
Unprecedented
personal response and apology from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron R.
White, with major implications, as he wrote:
Dear Mr. Stich,
As a single Justice I can
be of no help to
you. I am returning your
petition.
Sincerely yours,
Byron White
- Duplicate of Petition for Emergency Relief that was sent
to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron White, that:
- Detailed a sampling of the corrupt and criminal acts
of key people in government and the severe consequences of those federal
offenses; (b) the retaliation by key people in government seeking to
protect the corruption, the perpetrators, by severe personal and
financial harm involving major violations of California and federal laws
and constitutional protections.
--------------------
Sampling of the corruption and resulting being identified,
before the October 1991 petition was sent to Justices of the U.S.
Supreme Court:
- Long series of
fatal aviation disasters—first
discovered while attempting to carry out the official assignment to report
and halt the corruption in the aviation safety activities at United Airlines
and the enabling of that corruption by management in the Denver FAA offices.
- 1988, December 21. FBI-DOJ corruption related to the
bombing of
Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie.
- 1979.
October Surprise. This covert operation did not resulted in any
catastrophic event, but was one of an endless number of covert operations
that involved U.S. politicians and the cover-ups by the lap-dog U.S. media.
- Sampling of
other corruption discovered and being reported by
corruption exposing whistleblowers and the corruption-fighting
whistleblower.
Sampling of the harm resulting after that 1991
filing to Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court (which reported the corruption and
sampling of the consequences. If the cover-ups by the Justices of the U.S.
Supreme Court had not occurred, and the issues addressed, the following dramatic
tragedies made possible by the reported corrupt conduct probably would not have
occurred (as detailed in related books):
- 1993 bombing of the
World Trade Center, made possible by the corruption in the New York City
FBI offices.
- 1996 downing of
TWA Flight 800, July 17, 1996.
- 1998 bombing of
U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. August 7, 1998.
- 2001
hijackings of four U.S. airliners on September 11, 2001.
- Subsequent series of lies preceding the invasion of
Afghanistan and
Iraq, starting in 2001 October 7, giving the murderous attack. U.S.
politicians called that deadly attack on Afghans, Operation Enduring
Freedom. The invasion of Iraq started on March 19, 2003, and called,
Operation Iraqi Freedom. See also
comparison of blame between Afghanistan and Iraq as compared to the
corruption repeated reported by the
corruption-fighting whistleblower.
-
Petition for emergency relief from repeated criminal contempt of court
charges by federal district court judges Marilyn Petal and Vaughn Walker,
resulting in his arrest and then house arrest for five years, again for
attempting to report criminal activities and exercising federal defenses
against the violations of federally protected rights that were parallel
efforts to halt his exposure activities. Stich filed a petition for
emergency relief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
January 22, 1992.
-
1994 petition to Supreme Court for emergency relief, return of
civil rights permanently terminated by series of unlawful and
unconstitutional injunctive orders barring Stich from filing any papers in
any federal court. (August 15, 1994) The effect−and
surely the intent−was to block
Stich from filing papers under the federal crime reporting statute to report
criminal activities in government offices to a federal judge. The other
probably intent was to block Stich from exercising the multiple federal
defenses against the massive numbers of repeated violations of state and
federal laws and constitutional protections.
Sampling of
U.S. Supreme Court filing in 1994:
1994 petition to Supreme Court for emergency
relief, return of civil rights permanently terminated by series of unlawful
and unconstitutional injunctive orders barring Stich from filing any papers
in any federal court. (August 15, 1994) The effect—and surely the
intent—was to block Stich from filing papers under the federal crime
reporting statute to report criminal activities in government offices to a
federal judge. The other probably intent was to block Stich from exercising
the multiple federal defenses against the massive numbers of repeated
violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections.
Sampling of
U.S. Supreme Court filings in 1995:
Letter to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg, January 16, 1995.
Sampling of U.S. Supreme
Court filings in 1997:
-
1997 petition for
Writ
of Certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court, which would have exposed a broad
pattern of criminal and subversive activities as defined in Stich's books,
the third editions of Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America,
and Drugging America. This filing would have made a Supreme Court
record of these matters, and required the Justices to engage in a documented
cover-ups of the grave charges. This petition was submitted on August 15,
1997.
- It was improperly refused filing, apparently
to avoid making a record of the corrupt activities by federal judges
over whom the Justices of the Supreme Court have supervisory
responsibilities. This tactic repeated the prior pattern, which would be
duplicated in the future, of Supreme Court judges blocking the reports
of criminal activities and misusing the federal courts as a racketeering
tool through judicially perpetrated civil rights violations while
concurrently voiding legal and constitutional defenses.
-
Letter to the clerk of
the
U.S. Supreme Court, clerk, William K. Sutter, (August 23, 1997) making
reference to his role in fraudulently refusing to file a petition for writ
of certiorari which would have made a judicial record of certain major
segments of the judicial and other corruption which Stich and his group of
government agents had discovered, including the pattern of CIA drug
trafficking into the United States, the Justice Department retaliation
against Stich and his coalition for seeking to report these criminal acts,
and the role of federal judges in these actions.
August 1997 petition to the United States Supreme Court reported the corruption
relating to a series of prior airline crashes and the judicial and Justice
Department actions to block these reports, was submitted to the Court in
August 1997.
Sampling of U.S. Supreme Court filings in 1998:
U.S.
Supreme Court Justices Approving Sentencing to Prison
A Former Federal Agent For Reporting
Ongoing High-Level Corruption in Government.
The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court approved federal judges−over
whom they had supervisory responsibilities−sentencing an American citizen
to prison for attempting to report, under the mandatory crime reporting statute,
to federal prison for seeking to report ongoing criminal activities resulting in
great and irreparable harm to millions of people, and the public as a group, and
to national security.
- Federal judges and Justice Department personnel filing
criminal contempt of
court against a former federal agent and whistleblower for reporting
ongoing corruption in key
government positions that were resulting in, and enabling to occur,
great harm, sometimes deaths,
and sometimes catastrophic consequences.
- Sampling of the great harm inflicted upon the whistleblower trying to
halt his exposure activities which consisted of years of major civil rights,
constitutional protections, and human rights violations, through misuse of
the Justice Department and federal courts.
- Supreme
Court Justice Anthony Kennedy's complicity before and after becoming a
Justice in U.S. Supreme Court.
Sampling of Supreme
Court filings in 2000:
- Letter to
Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, March 16, 2000, with similar
information. No response.
- Letter to
Supreme Court Justice Rehnquist April 11, 2000.
-
Petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court
submitted on November 10, 2000, under Supreme Court rule 12, Title 28 U.S.C.
§ 1651, and Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.
This petition described the pattern by
federal judges of blocking the reports of criminal activities that amounted
to obstruction of justice, the civil rights violations that were part of the
scheme to block these reports, and other violations.
No response. The court never responded to this petition and never filed it,
despite the legal requirement to do so. November 10, 2000. Several criminal acts were committed, including obstruction of
justice, aiding and abetting, and others.
-
December 12, 2000, letter to clerk of U.S. Supreme Court addressing his
lying in a previous letter as the clerk sought to support his refusal to
file a petition with the court.
Sampling of 2001 U.S.
Supreme Court Submissions,
Shortly Before September 11, 2001.
During 2001, shortly before the corruption of key people in
the government's primary aviation safety offices (FAA) and key people in the
Department of Justice played major enabling roles in the 9/11 airline
hijackings, former federal agent Rodney
Stich again attempted to prevent the continuation of the preventable
aviation disasters that were combined with the massive civil and constitutional
violations being inflicted by lawyers, California and federal judges, and
Department of Justice prosecutors:
-
Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, January 2, 2001,
and each of the other Justices. The letter described documented misconduct
by federal judges, including their blocking of reports of criminal
activities, retaliating against the former federal agent for seeking to
report the criminal activities, and the civil rights violations that were
part of the scheme initiated by a CIA related law firm in San Francisco
(Friedman, Sloan and Ross) to block Stich's reporting of the criminal
activities Stich discovered within the FAA and other government offices. No
response.
- Similar January 2, 2001,
letter to Supreme Court Justice Ginsberg.
-
Letters to all of the Supreme Court Justices,
January 2, 2001, sent to each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court
referring to documented pattern of corruption by federal judges in the West
Coast's Ninth Circuit, which included a 20 year pattern of repeatedly
blocking the reporting of criminal activities, judicial retaliation for
attempting to make such reports that were required to be made under the
federal crime reporting statute, and the involvement of numerous federal
judges in a scheme to take Stich's $10 million in assets that funded his
public-spirited exposure of criminal activities.
-
Letter to Supreme Court Justice Souter, January 2, 2001.
- January 5, 2001, Petition for
emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor, submitted under
the authority of Supreme Court Rule 12 and Rule 22 providing for application
to an individual Justice, and Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Even if relief was
denied, a response is required under Supreme Court Rule 22.6, which says:
"The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means,
of the disposition made of an application." Following their standard
practice, the submission was never acknowledged. To have done so would have
made a record of the fact that the Justices were made aware of the very
serious charges and did nothing about them. No response, despite the
legal responsibility to at least answer, such as denying the petition. But
to do so would make an official record of their cover-ups and obstruction of
justice. January 5, 2001.
-
Petition for emergency relief February 8, 2001
to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
-
Letter to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (February 15, 2001),
describing the corruption in the lower federal courts, their obstruction of
justice tactics, their felony retaliation against the former federal agent
seeking to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting
statute. This letter was a follow-up to an emergency petition submitted to
Justice Thomas. No response.
-
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas,
Petition for emergency relief, March 3, 2001. The purpose of this petition
was to obtain relief from the civil and constitutional violations being
inflicted upon Stich in efforts to block his exposure of criminal
activities, paralleling the judicial block to such reports. The petition
also reported the criminal activities that Stich sought to report under the
federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4). Some of the criminal
activities that Stich sought to report were primarily responsible for the
success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. If Thomas−or
any of the others who knew of these crimes−had
responded to these charges, it is probable that the hijackers could not have
succeeded in their plans that had such massive immediate and subsequent
catastrophic consequences.
- Letters
sent to Chief Justice Rehnquist and each of the Justices of the Supreme
Court of the United States (April 11, 2001).
- Known to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court was the filing
of legal papers in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada, seeking to
report:
- The ongoing corruption of certain employees in the
government's aviation safety
offices that would primarily responsible for the conditions that
make it easy to hijack four airliners on 9/11.
- The ongoing corruption of certain employees in the
FBI and other
Department of Justice offices.
- The ongoing corruption of
federal judges that
prevented reporting of the corruption in the government's aviation
safety offices and within the various offices of the U.S. Department of
Justice.
- The pattern of corrupt, unlawful, and
unconstitutional actions of a hoard of lawyers and law firms that were
filing sham lawsuits against the former federal agent that were parallel
to the obstruction of justice tactics by federal judges, both groups
seeking to halt his continuing attempts to publicize the deadly
corruption.
The prior pattern of
cover-ups by the Supreme Court Justices, that enabled to occur a continuation of
preventable airline disasters but other consequences of the corruption in the
various government entities, including the FBI-DOJ, CIA, and the government's
aviation safety offices. The consequences would, before the end of the year, be
even more dramatic than the previous consequences of the reported corruption. A
permanent cover-up would then be needed to prevent the public from learning
about the enablers in the Supreme court of the United States.
September
11, 2001: Continuation of Long Series of Corruption-Enabled Events
The prior cover-ups by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court had their most
publicized consequences on September 11, 2001. But the public was never informed
of their role in the 3,000 deaths on that day. However, earlier terrorist
attacks had already occurred, made possible by the corruption of people in the
Department of Justice.
Sampling of U.S. Supreme Court Filings in 2002:
Former federal agent Rodney Stich again sought to report the
documented corruption that was responsible for the conditions enabling and
probably encouraging the four groups of terrorists to so easily hijack four
airliners.
By that time, so many federal judges and Justices were
implicated in the 9/11 events that it was more important than before to block
them. They were promptly dismissed, violating the crime reporting statute and
numerous procedural due process requirements. No one feared the consequences, as
a powerful force in the federal government was protecting the guilty.
-
January 2, 2002, letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist, January 2, 2002,
advising him of the latest judicial obstruction of justice.
-
May 3, 2002, petition to U.S. Supreme Court
Justice Clarence Thomas dated May 3, 2002. The primary issues in the
petition were the massive civil and constitutional violations being
inflicted upon Stich by a CIA-front law firm and the aiding and abetting by
federal judges. The petition included details of how federal judges were
blocking the reporting of criminal activities, and listed some of the
criminal activities for which Stich and his group of other former government
agents had discovered and sought to report. Justice Thomas refused to
provide any relief, thereby aiding and abetting the criminal activities,
some of which played key roles enabling the events of September 11, 2001,
thereby insuring a continuation of the years of déjà vu tragedies.
-
Letter to Supreme Court Justice Thomas Thomas May 3, 2002.
-
Letter to Justice Rehnquist October 14, 2002.
-
Letter to Supreme Court Justice Willam Rehnquist,
December 16, 2002.
Sampling of 2003 Submissions to U.S. Supreme Court Justices:
-
Letter to Supreme Court Chief Justice Rehnquist, February 6, 2003.
-
Letter to Supreme Court Justice Rehnquist October 21, 2003. (The same
letter was sent to Justice Thomas and Souter.) This letter was an
extensive description of the criminal activities, the felony cover-ups by
federal judges, and the sham legal actions that violated large numbers of
federally protected rights for which federal remedies existed, which were
denied to me by federal judges. The significance of the sham lawsuits was
dual efforts to halt Stich's exposure activities by stripping him of the $10
million in assets that funded his exposure activities. Note: Every letter
sent to Chief Justice William Rehnquist had copies sent to each of the other
Justices.
Sampling of Submissions to U.S. Supreme Court Justices in 2004:
Sampling of U.S.
Supreme Court filing in 2005:
- January 5, 2005,
petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court ("appeal") of
dismissal by Judge Michael Mukasey, New York, January 5, 2005.
- January 5, 2005
petition to U.S. Supreme Court, Jan 5, 2005.
- 2005
petition following dismissal in New York by Judge Michael Mukasey, Jan
20, 2005.
- 2005
petition, January 20, 2005.
- January
21, 2005 letter to Justice Rehnquist, January 21, 2005
- January
25, 2005, letter to Rehnquist, January 24, 2005.
As if the greatest terrorist attacks in the nation's history
has not occurred−and probably to cover up for their
complicity as key enablers−the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court continued to
cover up for the ongoing criminal activities that made these catastrophic events
to occur. They thereafter rendered a
decision supporting retaliatory
actions against government agents that report corruption they discover
within government.
There were, of course, a continuing
series of direct or enabling harm, some
catastrophic, from the
corruption that former federal agent Rodney Stich and his coalition of former
intelligence, law enforcement, and aviation safety personnel brought to the
attention of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Egyptian protesters—the people of the United
States badly need your courage to handle the "sophisticated" form of
government corruption rampant in the U.S., but oblivious to the American people!
Miscellaneous other filings:
Great American Tragedies Enabled
by Lawyers, Judges,
Department of Justice Personnel's Simultaneous Attacks on Whistleblower
Sampling of Early Consequences
TWA Flight 800
U.S. Embassy Bombings
9/11
Easily-Preventable Multiple Hijackings
These few examples of the horrors
associated with airline disasters enabled to occur by documented
corruption withheld from the American people. The standard culture of
cover-ups in the United States enabled the corruption, cover-ups, to
mutate into different areas. In the aviation area, although the
continuing series of airline disasters eventually came to a halt for
other reasons, the culture continued, and enabled to occur a number of
easily preventable airline disasters. The inbred culture created the
conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to easily hijack four
airliners within a few hours of each other and kill nearly 3,000 people.
One of Over 200 Victims Choosing This Way to
Die—
Made Possible by Many Enablers in United States
Consequences of Corruption, Cover-Ups, And
Retaliation Felonies
Not Limited to Aviation
There were many other forms of victims from the systemic high-level
corruption. These included for instance victims of the:
-
Department of
Justice prosecutorial misconduct, people being falsely charges with crimes
in order to improve the prosecutors' career.
-
The explosion of
violent crime related to drug smuggling into the United States, in which CIA
assets were major players.
-
Series of financial
frauds appearing every few years, with the latest housing and financial
implosions surfacing in 2008.
-
Seizure of assets
from innocent people.
-
And many other
forms.
These offenses are described in the
books written by insiders.
Corruption of the Type Described at this site does not occur in a
vacuum. High-level corruption in one area is simply one tentacle of a
widespread culture of corruption. And the consequences of that
corruption−and the endemic cover-ups−have consequences in other
areas.
The
culture of corruption
affects the people
and the nation
in many other ways,
That includes the latest series of financial frauds that has occurred
in the housing and financial sectors. Also, the effect of the endemic
corruption and endemic cover-ups−major parts of the culture in the
United States−that enablers successful terrorist attacks upon U.S.
interests.
Harm to People Overseas From Culture Of
High-Level Corruption and Lies in the United States
In addition to the decades of harm
resulting from the systemic corruption of key people and groups in the
U.S. government, affecting aviation safety, financial, human rights, in
the United States, there is the harm from outside sources brought about
by the actions of U.S. politicians affecting people in other
countries—such as the history of invading and killing foreigners—there
are the successful "terrorist" attacks made possible by high-level
corruption, and then there are the foreigners who are also victims from
the same high-level corruption that adversely affects the American, but
in a different form.
Remains of a girl—about the age of the
9-year-old Killed in Tucson in January 2011.
In criminal law, people are
accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to
report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their
capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of
accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the
consequences.
Suggestion to people outside the United
States. Become familiar with the documented systemic corruption in the United
States and show the outrage lacking of people in the United States, and:
-
Help expose the endemic corruption that
seem to be acceptable to the
American people, and
maybe wake them up.
-
Help to protect yourselves against the
decades of ham inflicted upon
people of other
countries by the actions of U.S. politicians—supported
by much of the American public. Examples:
-
Serial lying by U.S. politicians
to use as a pretense to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, killing tens of
thousands of innocent people.
-
U.S. politicians
shifting enabling blame from their own corrupt actions that
encouraged and enabled four groups of terrorists to simultaneously
hijack four airliners, and shift the blame to the people of Iraq and
Afghanistan—with the help of a
dumbed-down American public that is mostly too lazy to learn the truth.
Books by
Unprecedented Number of Professional
Insiders on Multiple of Areas of Corruption And
Resulting Catastrophic Consequences
Books Revealing Inside Information on Serious
Threats to the People and Sources Of
Great Harm in U.S. Government
Over a
dozen highly detailed and documented books revealing a nation's leaders as riddled with
corruption with a history of resulting tragedies. These are heavily details
books written by granddaddy of corruption-exposing whistleblower Rodney Stich
with input from an unprecedented number of key personnel involved in covert and
overt activities. They provide the material for a peaceful "Arab Spring" outrage
among courageous Americans. (These books are available in print and digital
format at www.amazon.com;
www.google.com; and other web sites. At each
site, put "Rodney Stich" into the search box for a list of these books.
All of the
books are available at amazon.com, in print and on digital
formats,
and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the
various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall
picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year.
Information on the books by former government agent
Rodney Stich.
Sampling of early
books reviews.
Sampling of
complimentary
letters/faxes to author/activist
Rodney Stich.
Commendation of the granddaddy
of corruption reporting whistleblowers.
His background and credibility.
Bio on granddaddy of
corruption exposing and corruption fighting whistleblowers.
These books are
not-for-profit; they were first published when Stich had assets
in the 1980s of about $10 million, and had no need for book
profits. Department of Justice personnel and federal judges
corruptly seized these assets that were "foolishly" being used
to fund the exposure of the widespread corruption.
When a former key federal agent and his large group
of other key people with direct knowledge in various government
operations, with the background and
credibility of Rodney
Stich, provides such detailed information on corrupt actions by
key officials in government, that had already resulted in such
calamitous events, and cover-ups that insures a continuation of
these matters, and there is total non-response, there has to be a
matter of such grave implications in the governing structure of the
United States that the matters are either being protected, possibly
to protect the existing government oligarchy, or, the consequences
are so horrendous that they are avoided like the "third rail."
Similarities Between German
People Under Adolf Hitler
And American People
Under Another Oppressive Government Oligarchy
A poem written by Martin Niemoller,
relating to how Germans tolerate Adolf Hitler is especially suitable
to most Americans today:
First they came for the Jews, and I
did not speak out, because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the Communists, and I did not speak out,
because I was not a Communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out,
because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for
me.
Pastor Martin
Niemöller
Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984)
first supported the rise of Adolf Hitler, and then upon learning the
truth, and objecting, he was imprisoned. He wrote a poem about the
state of denial of Germans about what Hitler was doing. Probably no
better example could be shown than what has been done to the American
people, in their name, while they ignored the outrages.
The first step is to become informed.
And with the vast cover-ups, disinformation, and blatant lying by U.S.
politicians, media personnel, and political pundits, this requires a
little effort. In searching for information, don't be misled by wild
conspiracy theories, and go where facts can be found, including
courageous (and foolish) insiders who speak out in defense of the
country.
Sadly, fewer people read such books
(preferring trivia reading), rarely read newspapers (which is one
small step to becoming informed). Therefore, the future is bleak, made
possible by the corruption detailed here and in the books, the
cover-ups, and the public's indifference to their responsibilities.
International Consequences from
Consequences
Corrupt Conduct of U.S. Ruling Oligarchy
-
Millions of killed civilians in foreign
countries and many more crippled and maimed from the serial lying rampant of
U.S. politicians and their shills.
-
Over a hundred thousand dead Americans and
triple that number of maimed and wounded GIs in wars started and continued,
since the end of World War II, on the basis of serial lying by U.S.
politicians and lying by bureaucrats. These wars include the U.S. invasions
of Korea;
Vietnam; Cambodia, Laos;
Grenada; Panama;
Afghanistan;
Iraq; Libya;
Syria; and more to come.
-
Decades of undermining foreign governments,
assassinating or attempting to assassinate foreign leaders, providing
training used against the people of other countries, and much more.
-
Self-serving and other conduct by U.S.
politicians that generated the greatest number of people in the world's
history wanting to kill Americans, and virtually no thought given by the
uninformed and sheep-like American public to the deadly consequences.
-
The killing, or murders, of people, including
infants and children, using drones, in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia,
Yemen, and elsewhere.
The consequences will, naturally, be
experienced by Americans, our children,
for generations to come.
Thanks to the Very Few Who
Cared Enough
Thanks are given to those very
very few who have contributed funds to the
non-profit organization
that helps to fund these exposure activities.
Make Your Own Blog or Internet Site:
Easy and Inexpensive
Get your own blog site, domain name, or hosting site at the
popular godaddy.com hosting service.
A low-cost provider with excellent support service. Click on the following
graphic for information
and quick start.
Return to:
www.defraudingamerica.com
www.druggingamerica.com
www.unfriendlyskies.com
www.defraudingamericablog.com
