LIST OF LEGAL SUBMISSIONS TO SUPREME COURT JUSTICES
1997 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court, which would have exposed a broad pattern of criminal and subversive activities as defined in Stich's books, the third editions of Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America, and Drugging America. This filing would have made a Supreme Court record of these matters, and required the Justices to engage in a documented cover-ups of the grave charges. This petition was submitted on August 15, 1997. It was improperly refused filing, apparently to avoid making a record of the corrupt activities by federal judges over whom the Justices of the Supreme Court have supervisory responsibilities. This tactic repeated the prior pattern, which would be duplicated in the future, of Supreme Court judges blocking the reports of criminal activities and misusing the federal courts as a racketeering tool through judicially perpetrated civil rights violations while concurrently voiding legal and constitutional defenses. Organized crime never had it so good!
Petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court submitted on November 10, 2000, under Supreme Court rule 12, Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651, and Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. No response. The court never responded to this petition and never filed it, despite the legal requirement to do so.
Letters to all of the Supreme Court Justices, January 2, 2001, sent to each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court referring to documented pattern of corruption by federal judges in the West Coast's Ninth Circuit, which included a 20 year pattern of repeatedly blocking the reporting of criminal activities, judicial retaliation for attempting to make such reports that were required to be made under the federal crime reporting statute, and the involvement of numerous federal judges in a scheme to take Stich's $10 million in assets that funded his public-spirited exposure of criminal activities. That scheme required 20 years of uninterrupted violations of dozens of state and federal laws compounded by violations of every legal and constitutional due process defense guaranteed to all citizens. No response to these letters stating documented facts revealing major crimes against the United States, including those perpetrated by federal judges over whom they have supervisory responsibilities and vicarious liabilities. This non-response, the cover-up, the obstruction of justice, reflects the seriousness of the corruption against the people by those in control of the system.
Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor, submitted on January 5, 2001, under the authority of Supreme Court Rule 12 and Rule 22 providing for application to an individual Justice, and Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Even if relief was denied, a response is required under Supreme Court Rule 22.6, which says: "The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an application." Following their standard practice, the submission was never acknowledged. To have done so would have made a record of the fact that the Justices were made aware of the very serious charges and did nothing about them. No response, despite the legal responsibility to at least answer, such as denying the petition. But to do so would make an official record of their cover-ups and obstruction of justice.
Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, submitted on February 15, 2001, under the same authority as in the emergency writ to Justice Sandra O'Connor. No response.
Letter to each of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (April 11, 2001) listing key highlights of the pattern by federal judges blocking the reporting of criminal and subversive activities, retaliating against a former federal agent for attempting to make these reports, and combining a 20-year pattern of hard-core civil and constitutional violations to carry out the obstruction of justice.
Preparing petitions for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court are expensive and time-consuming. They must be prepared in booklet form, and 80 copies must be submitted. Approximately 70 of these copies are distributed to law libraries throughout the United States. The publicity given to these charges by distributing them in this manner would be another reason why every filing submitted to the Supreme Court since 1983 were refused filing.
Their is a record of every Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, for over 20 years, blocking the reporting of major criminal activities (described in the books, Defrauding America, Drugging America, and Unfriendly Skies), and aiding and abetting other federal judges to do so.
An Even More Serious Ramification Of Cover-Ups
If the charges of criminal activities could not be proven, it would have been a simple matter to allow the charges and evidence to be received, and then discount the allegations. Never once has any of the people holding check and balance responsibilities ever allowed the evidence to be presented.
The fact that this total block has been repeatedly done by members of Congress, Justice Department lawyers, federal judges, suggests a central source for controlling the obstruction of justice, and that most probably is inside the so-called Department of Justice.
Sham Excuses to Deny Due Process Continued the
Corrupt Judicial Culture That Stich Had Documented
For Over 30 Uninterrupted Years
The refusals were based on such excuses as the double spacing placed on the lines by the word processing program allegedly did not meet Supreme Court requirements, or the filings were late (which was not correct), or simply no response. To insure that the Justices were aware of the serious allegations, Stich sent one copy to each of the Justices, many times by certified mail to make a record of such submission.
Consequences Made Possible by Supreme Court Misconduct
The Supreme Court pattern of documented misconduct were not simply matters of academic interest. Starting with the Supreme Court misconduct in the 1970s, the cover-ups and obstruction of justice made possible the continuation of very serious misconduct on a national level, as described in the books, Defrauding America, Unfriendly Skies, Drugging America, and Disavow. For instance:
Deeply embedded culture of corruption in certain aviation areas (described in Unfriendly Skies) made possible the continuation of tragic consequences. Putting a face on these consequences, many hundreds of men, women, and children were cremated alive or dismembered alive, often after the indescribable fear of waiting for the end to occur.
Continuation of the drug smuggling into the United States by people acting under cover of their government operation, including the CIA, DEA, military, the state department, and even into the White House. The tragic consequences associated with these criminal offenses include killings, conversion of areas into war zones, corruption spreading throughout government and society similar to Mexico, elimination of constitutional rights, paramilitary invasions of homes, seizure of assets from innocent people, widespread prosecutorial misconduct, purchased perjured testimony putting innocent people in prison, and wholesale destruction of families.
Continuation of the pattern of corrupt activities by people acting under cover of government operations, as described in the books, which have inflicted enormous harm upon the American people.
List of Letters Sent to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court
Letters were sent to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court for the past 20 years seeking to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute (18 U.S.C. § 4), reporting the pattern of obstruction of justice by federal justices over whom they had supervisory responsibilities, reporting the misuse of judicial positions and the federal courts in a pattern of civil and constitutions violations that were part of the judicial tactics to block the reporting of serious criminal activities that Stich and his group of other federal agents sought to report.
In every case, Supreme Court Justices refused to respond (with the exception of Supreme Court Justice White). This refusal made possible the continued criminal misuse of the courts, the cover-ups of criminal and even subversive activities, and the continued harm inflicted upon the United States and many innocent people.
In later letters, after it was obvious there would be no response, Stich's intent was to make a record showing that the Justices had been informed of corrupt and criminal activities affecting national security and the involvement of large numbers of federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities and vicarious liability.
First In Long List of Cover-ups by Supreme Court Justices
The first in a series of cover-ups and complicity by justices of the U.S. Supreme Court occurred in the late 1970s and early 1980s, when former federal aviation safety agent Rodney Stich filed federal lawsuits seeking to circumvent the numerous blocks he encountered at every level in government offices. The heavy death toll in preventable airline crashes arising from the deep pattern of corruption in the government's aviation safety offices--enabled by cover-ups and indifference--caused Stich to use the law in a creative manner.
Eventually, he again sought to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute commencing in 1986 after starting to receive information and evidence from an increasing number of other former and present government agents. Concurrent with these filings lawyers and law firms started filing sham lawsuits against him to strip him of the $10 million in assets that funded his exposure activities.
Only One Favorable Response in 30 Years
Letter from U.S. Supreme Court justice Byron R. White (October 28, 1991) in response to report of corrupt activities in government and in the federal courts, implying the seriousness of Stich's allegations but stating that as a single justice--without the cooperation of other justices--"I can be of no help to you." Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court do not send personal letters to any of the thousands of letters or briefs filed in the court. It appeared that he would have liked to help buts court not do so, by himself. As a matter of law, this is not correct, but real-world conditions are often quite different from what the law says.
The year 2003:
Letter to Rehnquist October 21, 2003. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML) This letter was an extensive description of the criminal activities, the felony coverups by federal judges, and the sham legal actions that violated large numbers of federally protected rights for which federal remedies existed, which were denied to me by federal judges. The significance of the sham lawsuits was dual efforts to halt Stich's exposure activities by stripping him of the $10 million in assets that funded his exposure activities. Note: Every letter sent to Chief Justice William Rehnquist had copies sent to each of the other Justices.
Letter to Rehnquist February 6, 2003. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Letter to Rehnquist January 6, 2003. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Letter to Rehnquist December 16, 2002. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Letter dated December 12, 2002, to clerk of U.S. Supreme Court addressing his lying in a previous letter as the clerk sought to support his refusal to file a petition with the court. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Letter to Rehnquist October 14, 2002. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Letter dated May 1, 2002. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Letter to Justice Thomas May 3, 2002. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Petition to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas dated May 2, 2002. The primary issues in the petition were the massive civil and constitutional violations being inflicted upon Stich by a CIA-front law firm and the aiding and abetting by federal judges. The petition included details of how federal judges were blocking the reporting of criminal activities, and listed some of the criminal activities for which Stich and his group of other former government agents had discovered and sought to report. Justice Thomas refused to provide any relief, thereby aiding and abetting the criminal activities, some of which played key roles enabling the events of September 11, 2001, thereby insuring a continuation of the years of deja vu tragedies. (Word)
Letter to Rehnquist January 2, 2002. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Letters sent to Chief Justice Rehnquist and each of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (April 11, 2001). Word) (Adobe)
Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Petition for emergency relief, March 3, 2001. The purpose of this petition was to obtain relief from the civil and constitutional violations being inflicted upon Stich in efforts to block his exposure of criminal activities, paralleling the judicial block to such reports. The petition also reported the criminal activities that Stich sought to report under the federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4). Some of the criminal activities that Stich sought to report were primarily responsible for the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. If Thomas--or any of the others who knew of these crimes--had responded to these charges, it is probable that the hijackers could not have succeeded in their plans that had such massive immediate and subsequent catastrophic consequences.
Letter to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (February 15, 2001), describing the corruption in the lower federal courts, their obstruction of justice tactics, their felony retaliation against the former federal agent seeking to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute. This letter was a follow-up to an emergency petition submitted to Justice Thomas. No response. (Word)
Petition for emergency relief February 8, 2001 to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Letter to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, February 5, 2001.
Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, January 2, 2001. The letter described documented misconduct by federal judges, including their blocking of reports of criminal activities, retaliating against the former federal agent for seeking to report the criminal activities, and the civil rights violations that were part of the scheme initiated by a CIA related law firm in San Francisco (Friedman, Sloan and Ross) to block Stich's reporting of the criminal activities Stich discovered within the FAA and other government offices. No response. (Word)
January 2, 2001, letter to Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, with copies to the other Justices, describing the obstruction of justice tactics by federal judges. (Word)
U.S. Supreme Court Petition for writ of certiorari, November 10, 2000. This petition described the pattern by federal judges of blocking the reports of criminal activities that amounted to obstruction of justice, the civil rights violations that were part of the scheme to block these reports, and other violations. (Word)
Letter to Justice Rehnquist April 11, 2000. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML)
Letter to Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, March 16, 2000, with similar information. No response. (Word) (Adobe) (html)
The year 1998:
Letter to U.S. District Judge Milton Schwartz, June 19, 1998, making reference to his role in blocking the reports of criminal activities and his role in the scheme initiated by the CIA-front law firm. (Word)
The year 1997:
Letter to the clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court, clerk, William K. Sutter, (August 23, 1997) making reference to his role in fraudulently refusing to file a petition for writ of certiorari which would have made a judicial record of certain major segments of the judicial and other corruption which Stich and his group of government agents had discovered, including the pattern of CIA drug trafficking into the United States, the Justice Department retaliation against Stich and his coalition for seeking to report these criminal acts, and the role of federal judges in these actions.
August 1997 petition to the United States Supreme Court reported the corruption relating to a series of prior airline crashes and the judicial and Justice Department actions to block these reports, was submitted to the Court in August 1997. (Word) (html)
The year 1991:
March 4, 1991, Petition for emergency relief to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking relief from the continuation of criminal contempt of court charges for attempting to report criminal activities to a federal court under the federal crime reporting statute (and for exercising federal due process remedies against record-setting violations of state and federal laws initiated by a CIA-front law firm). (html) From 1986 to 1995, a succession of criminal contempt of court charges confined Stich to his home pending trial for attempting to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute.
The Federal Crime Reporting Statute
This is one of the most important tools to fight corruption in government offices that is immunized by the mob mentality of the system. The federal crime reporting statute requires anyone knowing of a federal crime to promptly report it to a federal court (or other federal officer), and requires federal judges to receive that information and any evidence, as part of his administrative duties. (He has no immunity for misconduct related to this administrative requirement).
Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
Many men and women, including mothers, have been sent to federal prison for failure to report what they heard on a one-sided telephone conversation relating to drugs. While sentencing thousands of people to federal prison in this manner, destroying their lives, the judges simultaneously commit far worse crimes by blocking the reports of far graver criminal activities that continue to inflict great harm upon the United States and its people.
For over 20 years, former federal agent Rodney Stich has documented the repeated obstruction of justice by federal judges, and even Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. These judicial cover-ups of documented criminal activities in government, discovered by Stich and his group of other former and present government agents.
The felony cover-ups, and even felony retaliation, by large numbers of federal judges, have over the years covered up for federal crimes that inflicted great harm, including many brutal deaths, upon men, women, and children. In the aviation environment, the latest consequence of the judicial cover-ups occurred on September 11, 2001, and the associated social and economic matters. This relationship is due to cover-up of the deep-seated corruption within the FAA--and its cover-up by other government checks and balances--that had an a natural ancillary consequence refusal to order correction of the hijacking threat.
These corrective actions had been reported by federal air safety inspectors and were easily accomplished and within the mandatory duties of the FAA. These matters are detailed and documented in the third edition of Unfriendly Skies. Other areas of hardcore corruption protected by federal judges are detailed and documented in the Defrauding America, Drugging America, and Terrorism Against America. To obtain, click here.
Another Federal Remedy Against Corrupt Federal Officials
Another federal statute permits any citizen to file a lawsuit in the federal courts to obtain a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful acts. This statute is Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.
These two statutes are among the most powerful tools in the hands of the people, even a single person, to report corrupt and criminal activities by federal officials--including federal judges--and to circumvent the blocks by those in key positions in the three branches of government. Possibly that was one of the reasons for the massive attacks upon former federal agent Rodney Stich.
Sampling of Great Tragedies That Could Have Been Prevented
If Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court Had Responded
As a result of the widespread corruption in overt and covert government operations, the systemic cover-ups that treat high-level corruption as the "third-rail," and the retaliation against whistleblowers, great American tragedies have repeatedly occurred, and will continue to occur.
Harm to the American public in non-violent areas.
Harm to people of other countries.
Harm to the few people in the United States fighting the high-level corruption in a meaningful manner.
Harm in general.
Harm inflicted on former federal agent and whistleblower during multiple schemes to silence him.
Sampling of Early Consequences
TWA Flight 800
U.S. Embassy Bombings
9/11 Easily-Preventable Multiple Hijackings
These few examples of the horrors associated with airline disasters enabled to occur by documented corruption withheld from the American people. The standard culture of cover-ups in the United States enabled the corruption, cover-ups, to mutate into different areas. In the aviation area, although the continuing series of airline disasters eventually came to a halt for other reasons, the culture continued, and enabled to occur a number of easily preventable airline disasters. The inbred culture created the conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to easily hijack four airliners within a few hours of each other and kill nearly 3,000 people.
One of Over 200 Victims Choosing This Way to Die—
Made Possible by Many Enablers in United States
Consequences of Corruption, Cover-Ups, And
Retaliation Felonies Not Limited to Aviation
There were many other forms of victims from the systemic high-level corruption. These included for instance victims of the:
Department of Justice prosecutorial misconduct, people being falsely charges with crimes in order to improve the prosecutors' career.
The explosion of violent crime related to drug smuggling into the United States, in which CIA assets were major players.
Series of financial frauds appearing every few years, with the latest housing and financial implosions surfacing in 2008.
Seizure of assets from innocent people.
And many other forms.
These offenses are described in the books written by insiders.
Corruption of the Type Described at this site does not occur in a vacuum. High-level corruption in one area is simply one tentacle of a widespread culture of corruption. And the consequences of that corruption−and the endemic cover-ups−have consequences in other areas. The culture of corruption affects the people and the nation in many other ways, That includes the latest series of financial frauds that has occurred in the housing and financial sectors. Also, the effect of the endemic corruption and endemic cover-ups−major parts of the culture in the United States−that enablers successful terrorist attacks upon U.S. interests.
Harm to People Overseas From Culture Of
High-Level Corruption and Lies in the United States
In addition to the decades of harm resulting from the systemic corruption of key people and groups in the U.S. government, affecting aviation safety, financial, human rights, in the United States, there is the harm from outside sources brought about by the actions of U.S. politicians affecting people in other countries—such as the history of invading and killing foreigners—there are the successful "terrorist" attacks made possible by high-level corruption, and then there are the foreigners who are also victims from the same high-level corruption that adversely affects the American, but in a different form.
Remains of a girl—about the age of the 9-year-old Killed in Tucson in January 2011.
In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences.
Suggestion to people outside the United States. Become familiar with the documented systemic corruption in the United States and show the outrage lacking of people in the United States, and:
Help expose the endemic corruption that seem to be acceptable to the American people, and maybe wake them up.
Help to protect yourselves against the decades of ham inflicted upon people of other countries by the actions of U.S. politicians—supported by much of the American public. Examples:
Serial lying by U.S. politicians to use as a pretense to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, killing tens of thousands of innocent people.
U.S. politicians shifting enabling blame from their own corrupt actions that encouraged and enabled four groups of terrorists to simultaneously hijack four airliners, and shift the blame to the people of Iraq and Afghanistan—with the help of a dumbed-down American public that is mostly too lazy to learn the truth.
Books by Unprecedented Number of Professional
Insiders on Multiple Areas of Corruption
And Catastrophic Consequences
All of the books are available at amazon.com, in print and on the Kindle, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich
Sampling of early books reviews
Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.
More information about these books by clicking here.
Thanks to the Very Few Who Cared Enough
Thanks are given to those very very few who have contributed funds to the non-profit organization that helps to fund these exposure activities.
Among the "Least" Guilty of the Enablers
Euphoric Blissful Ignorance−Enablers of Great American Tragedies
Amazon.com Ordering Links
Make Your Own Blog or Internet Site:
Easy and Inexpensive
Get your own blog site, domain name, or hosting site at the popular godaddy.com hosting service.
A low-cost provider with excellent support service. Click on the following graphic for information
and quick start.
available in various online pharmacies can be adopted to get back the normal sexual health once more at any age. Generic cialis
is also a drug which is highly adopted for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. This drug unlike any online pharmacy
other similar drug does not affect blood pressure of the patient under any circumstances and thus highly appreciated.