Evidence of Repeated Obstruction of Justice and 
Hardcore Civil and Constitutional Offenses by Supreme Court Justices

This page will gradually list the various petitions and letters submitted to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court that sought to report the pattern of corrupt activities by federal judges over whom the Justices had supervisory responsibilities. These corrupt activities by federal judges included:

  • Pattern of repeatedly blocking the reporting of criminal activities to a federal court as required to be reported under the federal crime reporting statute, which the judges must receive as part of their administrative (not judicial) duties. This obstruction of justice occurred primarily in the Ninth Circuit located in the western part of the United States (but also included other federal districts).

  • Pattern of widespread corruption in the bankruptcy courts involving federal judges, judge-appointed trustees, lawyers, law firms, and CIA personnel, as described in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies. Thousands of Americans suffered great personal and financial consequences as they naively exercise the statutory protections of Chapter 11 only to be defrauded out of their life assets. This fraud is aided and abetted by other checks and balances, including judges in the federal appellate courts and Justice Department trustees. Another one of America's unpublicized racketeering activities known only to the perpetrators and their victims.

  • Pattern of felony retaliation by federal judges against a former federal agent in retaliation for attempting to report the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute. These judicial acts of inflicting harm upon a former federal agent and witness for attempting to report criminal activities were felonies.

  • Record setting repeated judicial civil and constitutional violations against the former federal agent as part of the judicial involvement in blocking the reporting of criminal and even subversive activities that are described in the books, Defrauding America, Drugging America, and Unfriendly Skies. These violations were perpetrated through corrupt misuse of judicial positions and the courts by judges who were paid and in a position of trust to protect any citizen subjected to any one of the dozens of laws and constitutional violations inflicted upon that former federal agent. These violations invoked federal court jurisdiction under the Civil Rights Act, under the Bivens doctrine, under the Declaratory Judgment Act, and other federal statutes, constitutional provisions, case law, and rules of court. It is a federal offense for anyone, including a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, to fail to act when made aware of violations of civil and constitutional rights occurring.

  • Pattern of unlawful and unconstitutional injunctive orders by federal judges barring the former federal agent from access to the federal courts for the remainder of his life, which included voiding for him the rights and protections guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States. The intent of these orders were to block him from reporting the criminal activities that he and a group of other federal agents sought to report, to block him from using the multiple laws and constitutional provisions to defend against the unprecedented numbers of state and federal laws and constitutional provisions violated by California and federal judges acting in unison with a CIA-front law firm to halt the exposure of major corruption in key judicial and other government offices. These are the federal judges, and Supreme Court Justices, who are entrusted with preventing the violations of any one of these dozens of federally protected rights.
  • Pattern of felony retaliation against a former federal agent for exercising legal and constitutional due process specifically provided by federal laws and the Constitution against the pattern of documented hard-core civil and constitutional violations.

  • Pattern of documented lying by federal judges as they repeatedly seek to hide their pattern of substantive and procedural due process violations. This pattern was then expanded by Supreme Court Justices as they block every filing in the Supreme Court exposing these patterns of judicial anarchy.

Sequence Of Obstruction Of Justice and Cover-Ups By Supreme Court Justices

The Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court did file the federal actions submitted to them in the 1970s by the former federal agent when his court filings were limited to the corruption related to aviation matters, including the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board. However, every federal action submitted to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court after the start of the scheme by the CIA-front law firm in 1982, that would implicate dozens of California and federal judges in record-setting violations of federal criminal and civil rights laws, were blocked, in violation of law. 

Technically, Supreme Court Justices do not have to act favorably on submitted filings, but they must file them (unless they are gregariously not in compliance with the filing requirements). However, filing the petitions submitted by that former federal agent would make a judicial record and put the Supreme Court Justices on record as knowing of the criminal and civil rights violations purported by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities and make a record of their complicity in the federal offenses. 

Actually, the refusal of the  Supreme Court Justice to act on these early crash-related petitions put them on record as approving federal judges blocking the reporting of criminal acts. Those aviation-related lawsuits sought to report to a federal court under the federal crime reporting statutes the criminal activities that the former federal agent had discovered as part of his official duties and which were covered up by federal personnel, including the FAA, the NTSB, and the Justice Department (as described in the third edition of Unfriendly Skies).

In the second edition of Unfriendly Skies, the author, Rodney Stich, described the cover-ups by Supreme Court Justices in those early lawsuits, which he associated with causing the continuation of the air safety and criminal activities that resulted in even worse air disasters. Naming these Justices in the books that were financed by Stich's vast real estate holdings gave the Justices a vested interest in denying him every protection in law, any one of which would have halted the sham lawsuit and blatant violations of dozens of state and federal laws and constitutional protections.

Tactics Used By Supreme Court Justices To Cover Up For the Pattern Of Criminal Activities and the Cover-Ups and Retaliatory Acts By Federal Judges

Starting in 1983, shortly after the CIA-front law firm commenced the sham legal action to destroy the $10 million in assets that funded the exposure of the criminal activities, Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court repeatedly blocked every filing submitted by Stich (which by then were more legally precise than the earlier ones that they had accepted). The excuses included:

  • Claims that the double-line spacing provided by widely used word processor programs were a minute fraction of an inch off from the requirements for filings with the U.S. Supreme Court. (An examination of some filings by young Justice Department lawyers makes this argument even more  phony; further, almost every filing submitted to the Supreme Court Justices included a demand to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statutes, and this responsibility does not rest upon phony formatting technicalities.) The following list will be completed as time permits, along with links to the actual submissions.

  • Claims that the filing was not timely, when the facts clearly showed that the filings were timely, as further shown by protest letters sent to the Supreme Court, David Souter.

  • Starting in 2000, the Justices simply refused to respond to the filings that were submitted to them. 
  • This cover-up practice, and due process denial, by Supreme Court Justices and the clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court, David Souter, was stated in various letters.

  • To insure that the Justices were aware of the serious allegations and could not at a later date say they never received any of them, Stich sent one copy of each filing to each of the Justices, many times by certified mail to make a record of such submission.
  • Petition sent to U.S. Supreme Court (1983) seeking relief from the record-setting violations of civil and constitutional rights occurring in the sham California lawsuit filed by the CIA-front law firm (San Francisco's Friedman, Sloan and Ross, a key ACLU member), and the denial of legal and constitutional due process by federal district and appellate judges in the Ninth Circuit in California. Petition was denied filing, which constituted aiding and abetting of record setting hard-core violations of civil and constitutional rights by the same judges entrusted to protect these rights and protections.
  • Petition sent to U.S. Supreme Court (1986) seeking to have the injunctive orders held unlawful and unconstitutional that barred him for the remainder of his life from accessing the federal courts and voiding for him every right and defense guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States. Even convicts, and illegal aliens, had these rights that were denied to Stich by the entire Ninth Circuit appellate judges and over half dozen district judges in California federal courts. The pattern of injunctive orders were issued when Stich exercised federal remedies against the record-setting violations occurring in the California courts. Failure to deprive Stich of these federal defenses would give Stich repeated right to federal court access under numerous federal defenses.
  • Petition sent to U.S. Supreme Court (1987) seeking relief from the charge of criminal contempt of court against Stich and the six-month prison sentence inflicted by Ninth Circuit federal judges, who were aiding and abetting the civil and constitutional violations. The prison sentenced was retaliation for:

     

    • Exercising legal and constitutional due process against the record-setting civil and constitutional violations occurring in the California courts that were inflicting grave personal and financial harm upon the former federal agent. In addition to judicial corruption arising from aiding and abetting the violations, retaliating against a person for exercising constitutional due process remedies are felonies under federal law.

    • Attempting to report to a federal judge under the federal crime reporting statute the criminal activities that he and his increasing number of other federal sources had discovered. These acts were felonies for inflicting harm upon a former federal agent or witness for attempting to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute. In addition, the documented judicial obstruction of justice tactics were federal crimes.

Petition for Emergency Relief Submitted To Ninth Circuit Appellate Judge Anthony Kennedy Just Prior To Supreme Court Nomination

In 1989, before Stich had to return to prison to finish his six-month prison sentence received in retaliation for attempting to defend against the record-setting violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections (as part of the scheme to halt his exposure activities), Stich submitted an emergency request to Ninth Circuit appellate judge Anthony Kennedy just prior to his nomination for Supreme Court Justice. Kennedy denied the request, causing Stich, then almost 70 years old, and recovering from open-heart surgery, to go to federal prison in retaliation for exercising federal defenses against the record-setting civil and constitutional violations and for attempting to report criminal activities that he and his group of other federal agents had discovered.  

Stich then quickly filed, in 1989, a petition for emergency relief with the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, making the Justices aware of these serious criminal and civil rights violations by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities. The petition was denied the right to be filed, continuing the Supreme Court obstruction of justice tactic that commenced in 1987 and continues to this day. 

Stich filed a 1994 petition for writ of certiorari seeking relief from the seizure and liquidation of his life's assets by federal judges Robert Jones (Las Vegas) and Edward Jellen (Oakland, California) on the basis that the orders seizing the assets violated the legal and constitutional due process requirement of a notice of hearing, a hearing, and legally recognized cause. The properties were simply seized. Prior Supreme Court decisions held that orders that denied due process were void orders and were permanently void. The part that this taking of Stich's home, his businesses, his properties, his sole source of income, played in the overall pattern of judicial violations of dozens of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, and total denial of all legal and constitutional due process, were clearly stated in that and other petitions. That petition, and every other one submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court since 1983 as the unprecedented judicial civil rights violations continued, were blocked from being filed. 

This pattern reflects the actual subversion of the laws and Constitution of the United States by federal judges as led by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme court. Remember, these corrupt judicial practices were closely linked to the pattern of criminal activities by federal judges and the cover up of even worse criminal activities that these former federal agents sought to expose. Can you find a worse example of corruption in federal government in the nation's history?

  • 1997 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court, which would have exposed a broad pattern of criminal and subversive activities as defined in Stich's books, the third editions of Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America, and Drugging America. This filing would have made a Supreme Court record of these matters, and required the Justices to engage in a documented cover-ups of the grave charges. This petition was submitted on August 15, 1997. It was improperly refused filing, apparently to avoid making a record of the corrupt activities by federal judges over whom the Justices of the Supreme Court have supervisory responsibilities. This tactic repeated the prior pattern, which would be duplicated in the future, of Supreme Court judges blocking the reports of criminal activities and misusing the federal courts as a racketeering tool through judicially perpetrated civil rights violations while concurrently voiding legal and constitutional defenses. Organized crime never had it so good!
  • Petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court submitted on November 10, 2000, under Supreme Court rule 12, Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651, and Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. The court never responded to this petition and never filed it.
  • Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor, submitted on January 5, 2001, under the authority of Supreme Court Rule 12 and Rule 22 providing for application to an individual Justice, and Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Even if relief was denied, a response is required under Supreme Court Rule 22.6, which says: "The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an application." Following their standard practice, the submission was never acknowledged. To have done so would have made a record of the fact that the Justices were made aware of the very serious charges and did nothing about them.
  • Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, submitted on February 15, 2001, under the same authority as in the emergency writ to Justice Sandra O'Connor. Again, no response.
  • Letters dated February 1, 2001, sent to each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court referring to documented pattern of corruption by federal judges in the West Coast's Ninth Circuit, which included a 20 year pattern of repeatedly blocking the reporting of criminal activities, judicial retaliation for attempting to make such reports that were required to be made under the federal crime reporting statute, and the involvement of numerous federal judges in a scheme to take Stich's $10 million in assets that funded his public-spirited exposure of criminal activities. That scheme required 20 years of uninterrupted violations of dozens of state and federal laws compounded by violations of every legal and constitutional due process defense guaranteed to all citizens. 

Preparing petitions for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court must usually be in booklet form and almost 100 must be printed. These are time consuming and expensive, costing as much as $1000 to prepare. 

Many of these booklet forms submitted to the Supreme Court are distributed to law libraries throughout the United States.  The publicity given to these charges by distributing them in this manner would be another reason why every submissions to the Supreme Court since 1983 was refused filing.

Tragic Consequences For Americans From Supreme Court Misconduct

The Supreme Court pattern of documented misconduct were not simply matters of academic interest. Starting with the Supreme Court misconduct in the 1970s, the cover-ups and obstruction of justice made possible the continuation of very serious misconduct on a national level, as described in the books, Defrauding America, Unfriendly Skies, Drugging America, and Disavow. For instance:

  • Deeply embedded culture of corruption in certain aviation areas (described in Unfriendly Skies) made possible the continuation of tragic consequences. Putting a face on these consequences, many hundreds of men, women, and children were cremated alive or dismembered alive, often after the indescribable fear of waiting for the end to occur.

  • Continuation of the drug smuggling into the United States by people acting under cover of their government operation, including the CIA, DEA, military, the state department, and even into the White House. The tragic consequences associated with these criminal offenses include killings, conversion of areas into war zones, corruption spreading throughout government and society similar to Mexico, elimination of constitutional rights, paramilitary invasions of homes, seizure of assets from innocent people, widespread prosecutorial misconduct, purchased perjured testimony putting innocent people in prison, and wholesale destruction of families. 

  • Continuation of the string of corrupt activities by people acting under cover of government operations, as described in the books, which have inflicted enormous harm upon the American people.
  • And much more.

Obviously, any government official, and certainly federal judges, and more certainly, Supreme Court Justices, involved in corrupt and criminal acts, and hard-core civil and constitutional violations, reflect a great threat to the United States.

More filings will be uploaded as time permits, to show the pattern of documented cover-ups, and aiding and abetting, by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

What Does This Long Standing Pattern Of Misconduct by Supreme Court Justices Mean For the United States and You?

The documented record proves that the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have routinely perpetrated for the past 20 years of recorded events:

  • Blocked the reporting of criminal and even subversive activities, making possible the infliction of great harm upon the internal security of the United States, the corruption of the federal courts, the hard-core subversion of the rights and protections guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States. These are criminal acts.

  • Aiding and abetting and protecting large numbers of federal judges who repeatedly blocked Stich and his group of government agents from reporting  criminal activities under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute.

  • Repeatedly violated the due process right to seek relief in the Supreme Court from record-setting violations of dozens of state and federal laws and constitutional safeguards.

  • Repeated aided and abetted the violations of dozens of state and federal laws by California and federal judges, and acted to protect them against their major federal offenses.

  • Aided and abetted the taking of a former federal agent's life assets that violated every legal and constitutional protection relating to property rights.

  • Aided and abetted the corrupt misconduct by a CIA-front law firm, by Justice Department lawyers, and the people involved in the criminal activities that Stich and his group of government agents sought to expose.

The Federal Crime Reporting Statute

This is one of the most important tools to fight corruption in government offices that is immunized by the mob mentality of the system. The federal crime reporting statute requires anyone knowing of a federal crime to promptly report it to a federal court (or other federal officer), and requires federal judges to receive that information and any evidence, as part of his administrative duties. (He has no immunity for misconduct related to this administrative requirement).

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

Many men and women, including mothers, have been sent to federal prison for failure to report what they heard on a one-sided telephone conversation relating to drugs. While sentencing thousands of people to federal prison in this manner, destroying their lives, the judges simultaneously commit far worse crimes by blocking the reports of far graver criminal activities that continue to inflict great harm upon the United States and its people.

For over 20 years, former federal agent Rodney Stich has documented the repeated obstruction of justice by federal judges, and even Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. These judicial cover-ups of documented criminal activities in government, discovered by Stich and his group of other former and present government agents, 

The felony cover-ups, and even felony retaliation, by large numbers of federal judges, have over the years covered up for federal crimes that inflicted great harm, including many brutal deaths, upon men, women, and children. In the aviation environment, the latest consequence of the judicial cover-ups occurred on September 11, 2001, and the associated social and economic matters. This relationship is due to cover-up of the deep-seated corruption within the FAA--and its cover-up by other government checks and balances--that had an a natural ancillary consequence refusal to order correction of the hijacking threat. 

These corrective actions had been reported by federal air safety inspectors and were easily accomplished and within the mandatory duties of the FAA. These matters are detailed and documented in the third edition of Unfriendly Skies. Other areas of hardcore corruption protected by federal judges are detailed and documented in the Defrauding America, Drugging America, and Terrorism Against America. To obtain, click here.

Another Federal Remedy Against Corrupt Federal Officials

Another federal statute permits any citizen to file a lawsuit in the federal courts to obtain a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful acts. This statute is Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.

These two statutes are among the most powerful tools in the hands of the people, even a single person, to report corrupt and criminal activities by federal officials--including federal judges--and to circumvent the blocks by those in key positions in the three branches of government. Possibly that was one of the reasons for the massive attacks upon former federal agent Rodney Stich.

Related Web Sites

·         Chronology of decades of corrupt activities by the CIA, U.S. politicians, and other members of the system, as described in the book, Defrauding America.

·         Chronology of the arrogant and corrupt war on drugs--against the American people--as described in the book, Drugging America.
 

·         Chronology of arrogant and corrupt activities in the deadly politics of aviation safety, as described in the book, Unfriendly Skies.
 

·         Chronology of covert and corrupt activities in which the American people suffered the consequences of blowback, as described in the e-book, Blowback, 9-11, Iraq, Lies, and Coverups.
 

·         Story of a CIA operation based in Honolulu and its titular head, who was made a scapegoat by CIA and Justice Department personnel and a federal judge, after its cover was blown, and as described in the e-book, Disavow.
 

·         Site focusing on terrorism against America from Trojan-horse insiders and from outsiders, as described in the e-book, Terrorism Against America.
 

·         Information site to order any of the print or e-book format books by former federal agent Rodney Stich.
 

Help fund our exposure activities by placing orders for any amazon.com products through our links.

 

 

RETURN TO TOP