Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy
Criminalizing the Supreme Court

To properly understand this page requires an understanding of prior events. See He played key roles in the massive criminal misuse of federal offices to silence corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, despite his credibility. Those attacks had many catastrophic consequences. One of the tactics used to silence the corruption-fighter was to criminally misuse the offices of the U.S. Department of Justice and the federal courts to imprison Stich and also seize his assets.

Criminal Contempt of Court Charges For
Reporting High-Level Corruption

That segment of the scheme to silence the corruption-fighter was to charge him with criminal contempt of court. That charge arose from exercising the legal and moral responsibility to report the deadly corruption versus the many unlawful, unconstitutional orders barring him from making such reports.

To succeed, he was denied the constitutional right to a jury trial. At 68 years of age, while recovering from  quadruple coronary bypass surgery, he was sent from prison to prison in chains, and put into solitary confinement for 60 days. Further, while in prison, federal judges and Department of Justice personnel, unlawfully seized and liquidated the $10 million in assets that funded his exposure activities.)

Stich filed an appeal with the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and the appellate judges approved the most outrageous judicial conduct that had ever been brought before them. They approved the imprisonment that constituted prima facie evidence of felony retaliation for trying to report the federal crimes that he had discovered. They approved the obstruction of justice tactics, and the many other wrongful judicial acts. The implications of this judicial mindset were extremely serious. Without addressing a single issue that Stich raised in the appeal briefs, which they should have done, the Court of Appeals judges simply stated: "The judgment is affirmed."

That appellate court decision at San Francisco, issued shortly before Christmas 1987, was made by three judges, James R. Browning, Alex Kozinski, and Pamela Rymer. They turned down Stich's appeal without addressing a single one of the many defenses that Stich raised. All of them already knew of the series of deadly aviation disasters that he had sought to report. One of the judges was on the appellate years earlier during the series of frequent aviation disasters when Stich first brought these matters to the court's attention in a lawsuit against the FAA. That was appellate judge James R. Browning. If he had ruled that reporting a federal crime was not a criminal contempt of court offense, his prior enabling conduct would have been exposed.

Seeking Relief From Federal Judge Anthony Kennedy

Stich was ordered to turn myself in on January 14, 1989. He had to act fast. Over the Christmas holidays he prepared a petition to Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Justice Anthony Kennedy (before he became a Justice of the United States Supreme Court). Stich worked feverishly on Christmas Day to finish the petition for submission to Kennedy the following Monday.

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy was complicit in documented judicial misconduct that enabled to continue a long line of corrupt activities in key government offices along with the adverse consequences, some of which were very deadly. Kennedy's misconduct, which started while he was a judge in the Ninth Circuit at San Francisco, included joining an ongoing series of actions intended to halt the exposure of deadly corruption that former federal agent Rodney Stich sought to expose.

The sequence of obstruction of justice tactics which Kennedy joined involved dozens of lawyers and judges, seeking to halt Stich and his group from reporting the corruption in high government offices that they had discovered. After Justice Department prosecutors and federal judges charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for filling a federal action seeking to report the criminal activities, and sentenced Stich to six months in federal prison, Stich brought this information to Judge Anthony Kennedy via a petition for emergency relief while Kennedy was still a judge in the Ninth Circuit at San Francisco.

Petition submitted to U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit Judge Anthony Kennedy seeking stay of the prison sentence pending appeal of the judgment and sentence. Kennedy received this emergency appeal after he was named to be a Supreme Court Justice but before he left for the position. In that petition, Kennedy was notified of the criminal activities that former federal agent Rodney Stich had discovered, and that of other former government agents; the deaths associated with some of the corrupt activities, and the harmful effect upon other national issues, including national security due to the involvement of the FAA, FBI, and CIA.

The wording on this petition to Judge Kennedy was similar to the wording filed on October 5, 1987, with the Ninth Circuit court of appeals. (After Kennedy denied the stay, Stich was sent to federal prison, where he filed another request, which was granted. Stich was released, only to be returned to federal prison when his appeal was denied, including denial en banc by the entire 9th Circuit list of judges. The great numbers of federal judges implicated in the criminal cover-ups and criminal retaliation reveals the awesome extent of judicial corruption and judges complicit in the resulting consequences of the criminal activities.

Judge Kennedy was already involved in the corruption Stich sought to expose. Kennedy was on the appellate panel that heard Stich's prior appeal of the district court's dismissal of the 1974 federal action against the Federal Aviation Administration. Kennedy knew the consequences of cover-up, as several major air tragedies associated with the air safety corruption followed his decision upholding the district court's dismissal of my action. That action sought to report to a federal court the federal crimes Stich discovered, as a federal investigator, at United Airlines and within the FAA that were associated with a series of air disasters.

After Justice Anthony Kennedy denied the emergency request, Stich filed a second motion for stay-pending-appeal with Judge Ramirez. When Stich appeared before Ramirez on February 16, 1988 on the motion, he delayed rendering a decision, continuing the matter until March 4th, 1988, the date Stich was to be imprisoned. Stich asked Ramirez to grant a continuance of the incarceration date to permit him to request a stay of the prison sentence pending appeal from the United States Court of Appeals, if he denied the motion. Ramirez assured Stich that he could request a stay from him on March 4th, implying that he would stay the sentence.

Kennedy had testified at great lengths during his televised Senate confirmation hearing for appointment to the Supreme Court, expressing repeated concerns for due process, constitutional safeguards, respect for privacy. Kennedy denied me relief. His conduct violated numerous criminal statutes, including obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting, accessory before and after the fact, misprision of felonies, fraud, conspiracy, and other crimes. The same applies to the other judges described within these pages.

At that time he had been nominated for Justice position on the U.S. Supreme Court. The U.S. Senate confirmed Kennedy for the Supreme Court position on February 3, 1988, and he was sworn in a few days later.

Urgent Appeal to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court

Stich quickly filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court. In his written arguments, he raised the pattern of judicial suspension of civil rights and the criminal implications by Ninth Circuit judges, their obstruction of justice, their felony persecution of whistleblowers, and reminded the Supreme Court Justices of their supervisory responsibilities over these judges. Aiding and abetting these acts by judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities, the Supreme Court Justices upheld this misconduct, becoming co-conspirators with the criminal acts that he sought to expose.

The problem was that the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were already complicit in the criminal activities, having been repeatedly informed through filings in the Supreme Court since 1978, and through frequent letters to the Justices themselves. If they were to act favorably on Stich's emergency petition for relief, they themselves risked being exposed. That same problem pertained to every other person or group that had been informed of these ultra serious national matters that involved repeated matters of life and death, they too would be exposed.

Another page showing the involvement of Supreme Court justices.

Again and Again—This Time Shortly Before 9/11—
Cavalier Contempt for the Consequences 

Letters to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy (and the other Supreme Court Justices), January 2, 2001, sent to each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court referring to documented pattern of corruption by federal judges in the West Coast's Ninth Circuit, which included a 20 year pattern of repeatedly blocking the reporting of criminal activities, judicial retaliation for attempting to make such reports that were required to be made under the federal crime reporting statute, and the involvement of numerous federal judges in a scheme to take Stich's $10 million in assets that funded his public-spirited exposure of criminal activities.

That scheme required 20 years of uninterrupted violations of dozens of state and federal laws compounded by violations of every legal and constitutional due process defense guaranteed to all citizens. No response to these letters stating documented facts revealing major crimes against the United States, including those perpetrated by federal judges over whom they have supervisory responsibilities and vicarious liabilities. This non-response, the cover-up, the obstruction of justice, reflects the seriousness of the corruption against the people by those in control of the system.

Letter later sent to Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy.

9/11—Continuation of Prior Enabling Consequences

The four groups of hijackers were able to easily hijack four airliners on September 11, 2001, because of the following corrupt conditions and groups, each of which were the exact areas of corrupt activities that former federal agent Rodney Stich had sought to halt through years of unprecedented efforts, and for which he was severely harmed by a coalition of corrupt lawyers, Department of Justice personnel, federal judges, all of whom were enabled by the repeated cover-ups consisting of members of Congress and the U.S. media:

One of Over 200 Victims Choosing This Way to Die—
Made Possible by Many Enablers in United States

Victims of Less Catastrophic Events

There were many other forms of victims from the systemic high-level corruption. These included for instance victims of the:

  • Department of Justice prosecutorial misconduct, people being falsely charges with crimes in order to improve the prosecutors' career.

  • The explosion of violent crime related to drug smuggling into the United States, in which CIA assets were major players.

  • Series of financial frauds appearing every few years, with the latest housing and financial implosions surfacing in 2008.

  • Seizure of assets from innocent people.

These offenses are described in the books written by insiders.

In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences.

Suggestion to people outside the United States. Become familiar with the documented systemic corruption in the United States and show the outrage lacking of people in the United States, and:

  • Help expose the endemic corruption that seem to be acceptable to the American people, and maybe wake them up.

  • Help to protect yourselves against the decades of ham inflicted upon people of other countries by the actions of U.S. politicianssupported by much of the American public. Examples:

    • Serial lying by U.S. politicians to use as a pretense to invade Iraq and Afghanistan, killing tens of thousands of innocent people.

    • U.S. politicians shifting enabling blame from their own corrupt actions that encouraged and enabled four groups of terrorists to simultaneously hijack four airliners, and shift the blame to the people of Iraq and Afghanistanwith the help of a dumbed-down American public that is mostly too lazy to learn the truth.

Post-9/11 Criminal Cover-Ups Now Mandatory
For the Survival of Federal Judges and Justices

After the easily preventable hijackings of 9/11, the 3,000 deaths, and the even worse following warsfurther enabled by the high-level political corruption, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court had no choice but to now criminally cover-up for the systemic corruption in which numerous documents in the form of judicial filings constituted prima facie evidence of their complicity.

Despite the gravity of the charges from an insider, and the continuing matters, no response.

Overall sequence of events outlining the discovery of the corruption, the cover-ups, and the obstruction of justice tactics by lawyers and judges (and Supreme Court Justices), and the resulting deaths and other tragic ripple effects.

Complicity of Supreme Court justices with dozens of lawyers and judges involved in 20-plus years of obstructing justice that includes corrupt misuse of the federal courts.


Whistleblower index and the gross human rights violations against corruption-reporting whistleblowers, approved by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Background of corruption-reporting whistleblower Rodney Stich supporting his credibility, and a list of other factors—including a personal letter from Justice Bryon White—supporting the charges.

Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices
Obstruction of Justice Crimes—And
Catastrophic Consequences

Federal criminal statute, Title 18 § 1503, in the Omnibus Clause, states that a person [or group] who:

"corruptly or by threats of force, or by threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice" is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice.

Federal courts have read this clause expansively to proscribe any conduct that interferes with the judicial process, and broadly applied this statute to the "due administration of justice."

Sampling of Not-for-Profit Documentary Books
On America's Corruption in High Places








All of the books are available at, in print and on the Kindle, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich

Sampling of early books reviews

Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.

More information about these books by clicking here.

Email address for the author and activist against corruption in government:

For more information relating to the author and his activities put "Rodney Stich" into a search engine such as Google or The links run into many tens of thousands.






Return to: