The Dark Side of America's Governing Personnel—
And History of Awesome Consequences

This documentary provides specific information on the conduct of the Supreme Court Justices from the 1970s to today.  This documentary first provides information on the misconduct of powerful non-elected personnel in the U.S. government, the resulting harm and series of enabled catastrophic events enabled—including the series of al Qaeda attacks—and the role of the Supreme Court Justices in these matters.

First, two references are provided to indicate the importance of this information, and the credibility of the person and groups providing the facts:

Unprecedented Apology by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron White
To 60-Page Emergency Petition Submitted By
A Veteran Corruption-Fighter

In response to a 60-page Emergency Petition submitted to highly respected  Supreme Court Justice Byron White, the Justice response no other Supreme Court Justice had ever don. He   apologized for not being able—as a single justice—to help. The Emergency Petition corruption involving people in the most powerful non-elected government positions that inflicted or enabled decades of harm and catastrophic events, and starting to enable a series of al Qaeda successes.

World Record Series of Airline Disasters
From Corrupt Acts of Non-Elected Government Personnel

A series of aviation disasters enabled by the culture in the government aviation safety agency, known to knowledgeable insiders at that time as "the tombstone agency.

Harm to Individual Americans
By Non-Elected Government Personnel

Harm to individual Americans from the conduct of unelected government personnel, especially the personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice.

Corruption Generating and Enabling Terrorist Successes

  1. Misconduct that generated the hatred for Americans by al Qaeda, that which enabled the series of al Qaeda successes, and that which angered and bred a world record number of people willing to die in the process of inflicting harm upon the American people.

Criminal Misuse of Government Power
To Silence Corruption-Fighter

The criminal misuse of government power by non-elected personnel in government to halt the exposure activities of a former government agent who initially discovered the corruption after he was given the unprecedented official life-and-death-assignment to halt the misconduct resulting in world record number of airline disasters. One of those was a world record aviation disaster into New York City  by a politically-powerful airline that was experiencing a world record number of airline crashes and near crashes.

Decades of Credibility and Evidence

All of the above matters are addressed here, with abundant amount of documents that speak for themselves. Highlights of credibility by Captain Rodney Stich, whose unusual background started during World War II, where he was a U.S. Navy aviator and Patrol Plane Commander (PPC), later an international airline captain, a federal airline safety inspector—and his many CIA and other sources.

Decades of Documented Complicity By
Justices of U.S. Supreme Court

The documented complicity of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, throughout this time period. That heavily documented complicity enabled the corrupt conduct and consequences to continue and worsen, with the American people suffering repeated calamitous events.

Start of Documenting Corruption In America While
On Unprecedented Official Life-and-Death Assignment

During the early periods of aviation, starting around 1960, aviation disasters were a common event. But an unusually high number of these world-record aviation disasters were occurring at a politically powerful airline. Most were occurring because of unprecedented misconduct, including criminal acts.

Safety officials in the Los Angeles offices of the Federal Aviation Agency gave highly experienced federal airline safety inspector Rodney Stich the unprecedented official life-and-death assignment to halt the corruption in the aviation safety activities at United Airlines—and the corruption within the local FAA offices. Their conduct enabled a continuing series of  airline disasters to occur. At that time, the Federal Aviation Agency was known to knowledgeable insiders as the "tombstone agency" because of the many tombstones resulting from the internal misconduct.

One of those disasters occurred in New York City on December 16, 1960s; it was the world's worst airline disaster at that time.



Life-and-Death Assignment

Upon discovering, reporting, and attempting to correct the serious problems, FAA inspector Rodney Stich came under heavy attack from personnel at that airline, and far worse from within the FAA. Three additional aviation disasters occurred while he was under attack. Each of those deadly disasters were  enabled by the same safety problems and criminal misconduct that he had reported and tried to correct.

Those attacks prevented the government inspector from carrying out his official government assignment, was of a criminal nature, and had dire consequences for many families, with hundreds of horrific deaths. The attacks reflected the culture that made possible many aviation disasters in the areas where the personnel of "the tombstone agency" had responsibility.

The perpetrators were never punished, and some, even rewarded. The government inspector who was given this life-and-death assignment was a victim, as well as the many hundreds who perished in these deadly airline disasters, and their families. The deeply embedded culture of cover-up in the United States prevented public outrage and protected the ruling oligarchy.

Unprecedented "Independent Prosecutor"

Affected by the arrogance and the consequences, the FAA inspector used the law in such a manner that he acted similar to an independent prosecutor. He conducted a court-like proceeding with a court reporter and a lawyer from the FAA Administrator's staff as an administrator law judge. That had never been done before—or thereafter. At the end of the hearings and 4,000 pages of court transcript:

Despite the fact that professional safety personnel in the FAA had recognized the safety problems and gave Stich an unprecedented life-and-death assignment; despite the many federal reports proving the serious safety problems and criminal violations existed; despite the three fatal airline disasters that occurred during the attacks on Stich; and despite the continuing series of world-record aviation disasters. Another standard practice protecting the ruling oligarchy.

"You can't fight the system"

Other inspectors advised, "You can't fight the system." Also, those who reported the problems suffered retaliation, while those who covered up received outstanding performance reports and promotions. That was standard throughout government.

Outrage by Head of the FAA Sky Marshal Program

When the head of the FAA Sky Marshal program heard about the cover-up, he urged Stich to prepare a report to the FAA Administrator, and he would cosign the report. This was done.

Since the initial attacks upon the FAA safety inspector had to have high-level authority, the subsequent cover-up by the FAA Administrator was expected. It happened.

Subsequent Retaliation Forced Stich's Resignation

The continued retaliation against FAA airline safety inspector caused him to leave government and start a new life. The corruption, the deadly crashes, and the scandals increased.

Federal Court Filing to Report Federal Crimes
Enabling Series of Aviation Disasters

The corruption and aviation disasters continued at United Airlines, and the FAA's failure to address glaring safety problems enabled crashes at other airlines. Stich filed a lawsuit against the Federal Aviation Administration, seeking to report federal crimes at that agency, under the authority of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. That statute makes mandatory the requirement of anyone who knows of a federal crime to report it to a federal judge or other federal official. It also imposes a mandatory duty on a federal judge or other federal official  to receive the information.

DOJ Personnel Covering Up for Deadly Corruption: Excuse—
Stich Lacked Standing to Report Crimes of Federal Personnel!

Rather than perform their mandatory duty to assist in halting the deadly offenses, employees of the U.S. Department of Justice filed papers claiming that Stich had no standing to report the federal crimes. Anyone has standing to report a federal crime! Failure to make such report, as required by the federal crime reporting statute is a felony.

Federal prosecutors routinely charge individuals with obstruction of justice for failing to report a federal crime. In the book, America's corrupt War on Drugs, the case is cited of a black mother who was sentenced to five years in prison  for failure to report what she overheard on one side of a conversation relating to drugs.

Subsequent Widespread Complicity by Federal Judge's
Continued the Expanding Deadly Status Quo

U.S. District Judge Robert Schnacke went along with the Department of Justice's obstruction of justice tactic. He dismissed the action, in clear violation of due process and the federal crime reporting statute. Stich filed a notice of appeal and submitted written briefs.

During oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals at San Francisco, the three appellate judges acknowledged the seriousness of the charges and then stated it was a matter for Congress. Stich responded that he had brought these matters to members of Congress and failed to have corrective action taken. (Congress did respond. Two years after Stich provided members of Congress with evidence, in 1967, Congress terminated the Federal Aviation Agency and replaced it with the Federal Aviation Administration. But the same personnel and the same culture existed, under a different name.)

Complicity of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

Captain Rodney Stich then filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on April 30, 1977. That petition put the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on notice:

Mandatory Duty of Any Federal Judge or Justice
To Receive Information of a Federal Crimes

Under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, federal judges, and any other federal personnel—including Supreme Court Justices, especially them, had a moral and legal responsibility to receive the information. Especially when the reported and documented corrupt or criminal actions had already resulted in such catastrophic consequences. Surely, someone with the unusual background and credibility of Captain Rodney Stich, with the precise details and documentation he offered, and the horrific consequences if he was right, made it unconscionable, if not criminal, to block the reports.

The Supreme Court Justices issued a decision refusing to hear the action. Supreme Court Justices then had to continue the cover-ups to protect themselves from the catastrophic consequences that followed, enabled by the corrupt conduct they previously covered up.

World's Worst Aviation Disaster, 1978

In 1978, a PSA airline flight crashed into the city of San Diego. It became the world's worst airline disaster at that time—replacing the record held by the United Airlines crash into New York City on December 16, 1960. Captain Rodney Stich, in the process of writing a not-for-profit book titled, Unfriendly Skies, discovered misconduct on the part of the cockpit crew that contributed to the disaster: all-night drinking and partying before the early 7 a.m. departure from Sacramento. That flight went to San Diego, with one stop at Los Angeles.

Captain Stich obtained the information about the cockpit crew's all-night partying from a woman who was a passenger on that aircraft from its early morning departure at Sacramento, and who left the aircraft at Los Angeles, before it proceeded to San Diego. (Details in the book, History of Aviation Disasters: 1950 to 9/11.)

After obtaining  the information from the woman, Stich filed a petition with the NTSB to present material evidence that played the major enabling role leading to the disaster. The political NTSB board refused to receive the material evidence, violating their duty to receive it.

The NTSB political board members had a major self-interest in preventing Stich's role and information to become known. Stich's prior exposure of the misconduct of board members in the NTSB predecessor, the Civil Aeronautics Board, and its continuing cover-up of FAA problems, motivated the need to withhold the enabling causes from the official NTSB accident report.

Filing Federal Lawsuit to Circumvent Cover-up
By Political NTSB Board Members

 After the NTSB blocked Stich from presenting the material evidence that enabled the PSA disaster, Stich filed a federal lawsuit, Dec. 17, 1980, against the NTSB. That lawsuit sought a court order requiring the NTSB to receive evidence that explained the primary cause of the great PSA crash.

Within a couple of days after Stich filed the lawsuit at San Francisco, Assistant U.S. Attorney George Stoll in the San Francisco office contacted him by phone. Stoll agreed with Stich that the NTSB should be required to reopen the investigation. During this conversation, Stoll stated:

It’s ridiculous that the NTSB did not investigate further into the reported partying. ... The investigation should be reopened. ... I am going to bring pressure on them [NTSB] through the Department of Justice to see if they won’t reopen the investigation. ... The government has responsibility to see to it that its agencies do their jobs. ...

I can go ahead and file a motion to dismiss in the next few days, but I’m not satisfied with that because I don’t think in this case the government’s skirts are totally clean, and I don’t think it’s my job to cover up. ... I agree with you that what she said, passenger Helen Rhea, was far more than an investigator in many cases is reasonably likely to hear. It certainly is pregnant with some very serious implications. ... It is ridiculous.

Stoll stated to Stich that he was recommending to his superiors in Washington that the government supports his federal filing, and that the NTSB be ordered to reopen the investigation and admit evidence of the PSA cockpit crew's all-night partying before the 7 a.m. takeoff from Sacramento. Stoll also stated that he was recommending that the NTSB be investigated, as was obviously necessary.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Stoll was unaware of the long history of cover-ups by his Washington bosses in the U.S. Department of Justice. If Stoll was not blocked, the series of scandals involving earlier aviation disasters could receive worldwide publicity.

The Sudden Lie and Reversal of Concern

A week later, contradicting what he had previously stated to Stich, Assistant U.S. Attorney George Stoll filed a motion to dismiss the request for an order, stating in the motion to dismiss:

“There is no question in this case that the Board has performed its duty and conducted a substantial investigation.”

That Department of Justice tactic would be repeated numerous times as the system protected itself.

The complaint against the NTSB had been assigned to U.S. District Judge Stanley Weigel  in the Northern District of California at San Francisco. During the various motions by the U.S. Attorney to dismiss the lawsuit, Weigel admitted the gravity and probable consequences of the allegations in Stich's complaint. Under federal case law, the allegations in the complaint must be accepted as true in opposing motions to dismiss. Also, he had a responsibility under Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 to receive Stich's testimony and evidence when Stich reported the federal crimes to a federal court as required by that statute.

The lawsuit could be dismissed only if the allegations did not state facts constituting a federal cause of action. Judge Weigel dismissed the action, falsely stating that Stich was appealing an order of the NTSB, and that it came under federal statute, Title 49 U.S.C. § 1903(d). Stich did not file his cause of action under that statute. He appealed the order of dismissal, filing the appeal under Title 28 United States Code Section 1361. That statute gives federal courts the authority to force an administrative agency to comply with the law, and receive Stich's evidence. Judge Weigel stated in part:

“This is a matter that is properly before the Court of Appeals, and in a way I am sorry, because it is a fascinating subject and I would like very much to have it before me. But under the law, I don’t think I properly can.” 

He also stated that it should have been filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals. That was incorrect. But, if the complaint was filed in the wrong federal court, under law, he was required, in the interest of justice, to transfer the case to the Court of Appeals.

Repeated Acknowledgment of Concern—
And Sudden Cowardly Cover-Up

Stich then filed an appeal, which was heard by U.S. Appeal Judges James Browning, Joseph Sneed, and Mary Schroeder. They also admitted the gravity of Stich's allegations. In their May 27, 1982, decision, the judges dismissed the appeal, stating:

Although appellant’s concern for the safety of future airline passengers is commendable, in view of the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Valley Forge Chris­tian College v. Americans United for Separa­tion of Church and State, Inc., 102 S.Ct. 752 (1982), the judgment [of dismissal] must be affirmed.

Article III of the United States Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to “cases or contro­versies.” Consistent with this limitation, litigants may not make claims for relief in federal court without showing an actual or threatened personal injury. “At an irreducible minimum, Art. III requires the party who invokes the court’s authority to ‘show that he personally has suffered some actual or threatened injury as a result of the putatively illegal conduct of the defendant ....’” Valley Forge, supra, 102 S.Ct. at 758, quoting Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91, 99, 99 S.Ct. 1601, 1608 (1979). Even absent an article III bar, this court should refrain from adjudicating disputes based on generalized grievances shared by all citizens. Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499-500, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2205-06 (1975).

Stich’s concern, the risk of future airline crashes, is real enough. That concern does not, however, rise to the level of an actual or threatened injury. The risk is shared by Ameri­cans generally. Absent an injury which threatens Stich in a way which distinguishes him from the populace as a whole, federal court action is barred.

[Dismissal is] Affirmed.

Another federal statute that requires federal courts to exercise jurisdiction when the Federal Aviation Act is violated is Title 49 United States Code Section 1487. That statute states:

Any party in interest may apply to the district court of the United States ... for the enforcement of ... this Act, or such rule, regulation, requirement, ... such court shall have jurisdiction to enforce obedience thereto by a writ of injunction or other process, mandatory or otherwise, re­straining such person, his officers, ... from further violations of such provision of this Act or of such rule, regulation, requirement ... and requiring their obedience thereto.

Legal Filings Relating To Legal Action
Against NTSB

Judge's order, March 25, 1981, dismissing the NTSB lawsuit.

Statement of material issues, April 11, 1981, filed by Stich. 

Points and authorities, April 11, 1981, filed with the statement of material issues.

Opposition to motion to dismiss, April 19, 1981, filed by Stich in response to the U.S. Attorney's attempt to continue the cover-up. That obstruction of justice, seeking to protect wrongdoings in any government department, became the most common reaction  to every attempt by Stich to halt not only the corruption and criminal conduct, but also the often tragic consequences of the corruption. 

Stich's appeal brief s were filed in U. S. Court of Appeals at San Francisco.

By their action, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court continued to aid and abet the corruption by people in key government operations, and the obstruction of justice by federal district and appellate judges over whom the Supreme Court Justices had supervising responsibilities.

Circumventing the Blocks in Government Offices

Going directly to the people, the former  federal agent published the first edition of the not-for-profit book, Unfriendly Skies, it received excellent book reviews. The book became available just as the PSA tragedy occurred. Stich appeared on hundreds of radio and TV appearances, and gave talks before large audiences, receiving many complimentary comments from the public. These efforts were funded by Stich's real estate assets that he acquired after leaving government.

His expanded second edition in 1981 described the enabling role in the corruption and resulting tragedies by  Department of Justice personnel, federal judges, and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court—the most powerful people in government.

The reaction started in 1982, and included all three of the group to carry out and to protect each other's unlawful conduct. Their group conduct enabled the corruption to spread and the consequences to worsen  as the attacks continued, eventually meeting the criteria for a RICO criminal organization.

Expanding Efforts by Corruption-Fighter Resulted
In DOJ Scheme to Silence Him

The 1982 bizarre scheme was initiated by a CIA-FBI-front law firm in San Francisco, Friedman, Sloan and Ross. That sham lawsuit filed in the California courts at Fairfield, California, was barred by lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, barred  by dozens of  California statutes and controlling decisional laws, and barred by landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions, and barred by the status of the parties.

Sham Lawsuit Using Straw Plaintiff

The sham lawsuit used a Texas resident that the corruption-fighter had not seen for 18 years, from whom he was divorced nearly two decades earlier. That 1966 divorce judgment was entered as a local divorce judgment in the states of Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Nevada—and California. That woman had been repeatedly identifying herself in Texas government records as a divorce woman and also in federal Social Security records. She continued to do so while the San Francisco law firm stated she was married and wanted a divorce. All of this evidence was ignored, showing the sham nature of the action.

 The CIA-front San  Francisco law firm claimed she wanted a divorce and much of the assets, despite official documents offered to the California judges that the Texas resident had been declaring herself divorced throughout this period—and continued to do so after the sham lawsuit was filed.

The scheme tied up Stich's assets that funded his expensive corruption fighting efforts. It also prevented him from meeting financial obligations that periodically came due in his vast real estate operations. He started losing properties with tens of thousands of equity, including his home on a mountain top near Green Valley in California.

Judges at Every Level of the California Courts
Corruptly Aided and Abetted the Scheme

Every level of the California judicial system protected the scheme. Every one of the dozens of state and federal statutes that barred the action was repeatedly violated, and approved by judges in the California appellate courts and the California Supreme Court. The one exception was Justice Stanley Mosk in the California Supreme Court. He voted to hear Stich's appeal in 1983. But it required a majority of the California Supreme Court Justices to accept a case for hearing, and the others were complicit in the scheme.

California Judges Compounded their Repeated Law Violations
With Sham Frivolous Labels When Appeals Were Made

California judges compounded their repeated gross violations of state and federal laws, and lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, by violating every legal and constitutional defense.

Powerful Force in Federal Government
Capable of Perpetrating This Scheme

It eventually became obvious that a powerful force in the federal government was orchestrating the schemes, the criminalizing of the Department of Justice and the federal courts, the blatant wholesale violations of important rights and protections fundamental in the United States, while protecting the guilty.

For the next two decades, federal judges used the same frivolous and vexatious labels while attempting to exercise federal defenses for the multiple and repeated federal violations.

Exercising Federal Defenses To Halt Record-Setting
Number of Violations Of State and Federal Laws

The repeated six years of violations by California judges, of any one of the dozens of California and federal laws, constituted federal cause of action for which there were federal remedies. Federal judges were required to provide federal court access and federal defenses. At that time, the primary remedies against the sham acts by the California judges were the Civil Rights statutes, to halt the record-setting violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections; and the declaratory judgment act. That Act is to declare the validity of prior judgments that were issued 18 years earlier, and entered as final judgments in the states of Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Nevada—and California.

Prior Corruption Cover-Up Extended To
Direct Role in Silencing Corruption Fighter

In every prior action filed in the Ninth Circuit federal courts in California, attempts to report the corruption in the FAA and the NTSB, were unlawfully blocked by federal district and appellate judges. The same tactics were now applied to deny his defenses and enable the sham California action to continue, protecting the CIA-front law firm and the California judges misusing their positions into a criminal enterprise.

Sacramento federal district judge, Raul Ramirez, promptly dismissed the action at the first and only hearing, without allowing the case to be heard. Federal law requires that the allegations made in the complaint must be accepted as true to determine if a federal cause of action had been stated.

Dennis v. Sparks 449 U.S. 24 (1980) ("For the purposes of testing sufficiency of the complaint, the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true.”)

Permanent Termination of Due Process While
Inflicting Great Personal and Financial Harm

As Stich continued to lose properties, including his home, due to the continuing unlawful orders by California judges, he again filed a federal lawsuit in the federal courts at Sacramento. By this time, he recognized the sham lawsuit in the California courts were an effort to silence his reporting of the criminal activities he had been discovering, involving key federal personnel.

Every new order rendered by the California judges, which continued to inflict great personal and property harm, constituted as new federal cause of action. Failure to exercise that right would  be a forfeiture of them. Stich started combining issues relating to the violation by the California courts with reporting additional federal crimes that he had discovered, including those that we4re conveyed to him by additional sources. They included former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial institutions, and involved CIA drug smuggling, October Surprise, Iran-Contra, and other corrupt activities. Those filing included the additional authority and responsibility of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.

That action was assigned to federal judge Milton Schwartz. At the first hearing, he expressed concern, and then scheduled another hearing. At that next hearing, his concern was suddenly gone. He dismissed the action, and compounded it by an issuing a grossly illegal and unconstitutional order permanently. That order barred Stich from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court—enabling the great personal and financial harm to be inflicted upon him by California judges

That order also protected the perpetrators and continued the deadly ongoing problems in the Federal Aviation Administration, the CIA corruption, which included massive drug smuggling associated  with the high level of violent crime. AT that time, the corruption was generating hatred and attacks against U.S. targets, and also enabling terrorist successes that were increasing in catastrophic consequences.

Carte Blanche Termination of Liberty and Justice for All—
With Far-Reaching National Consequences: 9/11 and Beyond!

That order gave the California judges and the CIA-front law firm carte blanche immunity to continue their attacks upon the corruption fighter.  Stich then filed an appeal with the federal appellate courts at San Francisco. As they did with the lawsuit against FAA and the lawsuit against NTSB, they denied relief, as they supported the massive violations and harm being inflicted upon Stich.

Stich then filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court, in December 1985, case number A-313. The Supreme Court Justices refused to act on the serious constitutional violations and other issues by denying a hearing. That petition included:

  • The great personal and financial harm upon the corruption-fighter using gross violations of civil and constitutional rights by the California judges, and setting  a standard for further such violations.

  • The gross violations by lower federal court judges to perform their mandatory duties and provide a federal court forum and relief, a mandatory duty and for which they were being paid. The Supreme Court Justices have mandatory supervising responsibilities over the conduct of federal district and appellate judges.

  • The Supreme Court Justices violated the statute, Title 42 USC § 1986, that requires anyone, who becomes aware of violations of a person's civil rights, to provide relief, if they are capable of doing so.

  • The Supreme Court Justices violated the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, that also requires them to receive information of federal crimes—made worse by the consequences of those federal offenses.

Prison For Reporting Corruption
To Halt the Resulting Horrors

Captain Stich's discovery of corruption had started with the life-and-death-assignment in the FAA to halt the aviation safety problems and corrupt conduct that enabled a series of world-record aviation disasters. These discoveries expanded over the years as his efforts became known to other former government personnel in the CIA, FBI, DEA, former drug smugglers—working for CIA and DEA personnel, former Mafia insiders, and others. These were key people who had been directly involved in numerous operations that were being lightly addressed in the media, were subverting national interests, generating the formation of terrorists, and enabling their series of terrorist successes against U.S. interests. They included:

United States: the Only Modern Nation Where Such
Massive and Open Government  Corruption Could Exist

Only in the United States could such open criminality could exist and be kept secret from the trivia-obsessed people. And no reaction from the people.

Legal Filing Combining Issues of Unprecedented
Past, Present, and Future Gravity

As Stich received information about the CIA drug smuggling and other criminal matters that were serious crimes against the United States, he exercised his responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. He sought to report additional criminal activities that he and his sources had discovered, while simultaneously seeking relief from the ongoing illegal actions by California judges that were then resulting in the loss of his home.

Further Criminal Attacks by DOJ Personnel And
Federal Judges to Silence Corruption-Fighter

That filing triggered an attack from federal prosecutor David Levi and federal judges Milton Schwartz, Raul Ramirez, Edward Garcia, and magistrate John Moulds. They all participated in  the charges against Captain Stich, by charging him with criminal contempt of court for having filed papers in the federal court when a prior illegal and unconstitutional order. (The effect, and surely the intent, of that prior illegal and unconstitutional order was to halt the reporting of the corruption in key non-elected government positions, to deprive Stich the federal defenses against the sham legal action in the California courts, and protect the perpetrators.)

Violated the Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial—
Creating a Kangaroo Court Proceeding
To Carry Out the Scheme

A scheme such as this had little chance of succeeding in a jury trial. With Stich's Sacramento attorney, Joel Pegg, assisting federal prosecutor David Levi, Stich was denied his constitutional right to a jury trial. In essence, Captain Stich was charged, prosecuted, judged and sentenced by the same groups criminally involved in the cover-ups of the corruption being reported by Stich and his sources. These horrific obstruction of justice and civil rights violations were approved and enabled by the entire Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals judges (including Anthony Kennedy) and the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. 

Subverted and Sabotaged by Personal Attorney

Sacramento attorney, Joel Pegg, the attorney to which Stich had paid $20,000 (1980 dollars) to represent him, then sabotaged his client. Pegg, refused to object to the denial of a jury trial, refused to raise the multitude to defenses again the criminal contempt of court charge, and lied about filing federal papers. He was one of many attorneys sabotaging Stich and assisting federal prosecutors and California and federal judges. Another sampling of how anyone in the United States can be destroyed if targeted by the awesome powers of non-elected personnel in key government offices.

Attorney Pegg repeatedly acted to deprive Stich of his defenses while insuring the success of the attacks upon Stich. Nearing the age of 70, and recovering from quadruple open heart surgery, federal judges that were themselves involved in criminal acts, sentenced Captain Stich to six months in federal prison. (Pegg's legal secretary in Sacramento, Karen Fogel, who was privately supportive of Stich, and met with him, mysteriously died shortly thereafter at the young age of 43.)

Appeals Judge Anthony Kennedy's Complicity

U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Anthony Kennedy was a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals at San Francisco, from 1975 to February 1988. During this time, he was repeatedly made aware of the court filings by Captain Rodney Stich; the great harm resulting from the massive violations occurring in the California courts; and the sham criminal obstruction of justice charge. He also knew of the criminal acts by key federal personnel  and the series of harmful consequences, including the start of corruption-enabled al Qaeda successes.

Judge Kennedy was aware of the corrupt misconduct in key government offices, the years of harm to individual Americans, and the series of resulting catastrophic events. He was repeatedly made aware of them, even after the misconduct played enabling roles in the start of al Qaeda successes, and again made aware of the consequences by Supreme Court submissions and personal letters.

Some of Kennedy's previous writings—for feel-good public consumption—included "indifference to personal liberty is but the precursor of the state's hostility to it.") ...  "a zone of liberty, a zone of protection, a line that's drawn where the individual can tell the Government, 'Beyond this line you may not go."

Over the Christmas holidays, Stich prepared an Emergency Petition to Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals for filing the following Monday. The wording in that petition was similar to a later petition. Sabotaged by the attorney that he hired, he prepared the petition for filing with the Ninth Circuit court of appeals. That petition was denied.

On March 4, 1988, when Captain Stich appeared before Judge Raul Ramirez, expecting to be given a date to turn himself in, Judge Ramirez ordered him seized. Stich had not made arrangement for his loyal companion, Midas, nor the many other things that needed to be done. Rather than allow Stich to appear at the designated prison, at the age of 67, he was unexpectedly seized. He was then paraded from one prison to another, in chains, stopping at public facilities between prisons.

During this period, Captain Stich was subjected to additional stress by being put in solitary confinement for four weeks. There were times when he thought of committing suicide. He had been a successful real estate operator and highly respected, and then this, in the face of the voluminous laws that allegedly protect against this type of subverted government offices!

Naval Aviator Throughout World War II,  Returning
Home to a More Sinister Enemy

During the period starting with the life-and-death-assignment he was repeatedly attacked, suffering worse harm than the five years spent in the U.S. Navy during World War II, where he was a Naval Aviator and Navy Patrol Plane Commander. There were many other similar victims, such as Lt. Colonel Richard Lt. Colonel Richard Taus, who repeatedly risked his life to protect wounded GIs in Vietnam, only to have his life destroyed when he, as an FBI Special Agent in the New York City offices, reported corrupt conduct by his FBI supervisor, Lindley DeVecchio. That matter is one of the nation's most deadly scandals, being covered up by people throughout government and in the media, possibly to avoid mass removal of key personnel in the U.S. government. Sample links to that scandal:

While Under Repeated Attacks, Corruption-Enabled Consequences
Changed from Aviation Disasters to Terrorist Successes

The consequences of the expanding corruption, while under attack for reporting the corruption, expanded from the fraud-enabled aviation disasters to corruption-enabled terrorist successes. These included:

Kennedy's  Lies At His Senate Confirmation Hearing

Kennedy had testified at great lengths during his televised Senate confirmation hearing for appointment to the Supreme Court. He expressed his concern for due process, constitutional safeguards, respect for privacy, all lies, as shown by his complicity in the attacks upon Captain Stich while Kennedy was on the federal court of appeals in San Francisco.

 Kennedy denied relief to Stich, while the U.S. Senate (kept informed of these matters) confirmed Kennedy for the Supreme Court position on February 3, 1988.

Other Related Filings

Captain Stich filed an appeal brief to Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, April 1, 1989. The judges continued their block as they had done since the 1970s of all reports of corruption-related tragedies, and approved the gross personal attacks and harm inflicted upon Captain Stich by Department of Justice personnel and federal judges. 

A petition to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco, March 4, 1991. Denied.

Contempt of Court appeal brief to 9th Circuit judges at San Francisco, April 1, 1989.

A reply brief to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 26, 1991. Denied.

A petition for emergency relief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. January 22, 1992.

Petitions sent to U.S. Supreme Court Justices that were denied.

Complicity of U.S. Attorney Eric H. Holder, Jr.
The System Protects Each Other

U.S. Attorney Eric H. Holder, Jr., in the District of Columbia courts, was also complicit in these matters. Holder signed an order (Civil Action No. 95-2360 CRR, supporting the illegal and unconstitutional order permanently denying to the corruption-fighter the legal and constitutional protections against the violations perpetrated by personnel of the U.S. Department of Justice, federal judges, and Supreme Court Justices. Holder was later promoted to the position of U.S. Attorney General.

Exercising Another Defense That Revealed DOJ
And Judicial Corruption in the Bankruptcy Courts

The corruption-fighter was losing his home and other properties because the CIA-front San Francisco law firm placed lis pendens on $10 million of real estate assets. The  multiple properties had loans periodically coming due and needing to be renewed, which could not be done while the lis pendens existed (In law, a lis pendens is a written notice that a lawsuit has been filed concerning real estate, involving either the title to the property or a claimed ownership interest in it. That prevents existing loans from being renewed or refinanced.) The Friedman, Sloan and Ross law firm, using  the "straw" plaintiff in Texas to file the sham action, allowed the properties to be lost by not lifting the lis pendens.

California judges aided the criminal scheme by violating every one of the several dozen state and federal statutes, controlling decisional laws, landmark Supreme Court decisions, and  constitutional protections, with the additional complicity of federal judges—and Supreme Court Justices—forced the corruption fighter to seek civil rights relief from a bankruptcy court judge.

Even though his $10 million in real estate assets were in excellent financial condition, the California judges blocked the periodic refinancing of properties that were need. He filed Chapter 11 in the bankruptcy courts at Las Vegas (to get away from the federal judges in California) that permit a corporation to rearrange any financial or other problem and prevent loss of the properties. He sought a court order removing the lis pendens so that he could refinance loans that had come due.

A bankruptcy court judge also has the responsibility to provide relief from the civil rights violations under Title 42 USC § 1983-1986. Anyone who knows of such violation and who is in a position to halt the violations, and fails to do so, violates the 1986 part of that Act. The corruption fighter relied on this responsibility in the Civil Rights statutes.

At the first couple of hearings, Las Vegas bankruptcy judge Robert Jones stated he would order the removal of the lis pendens to arrange for refinancing, and that he would thereafter dismiss the bankruptcy filing.

Continuing Attorney Sabotage—Protected by The
RICO-Like Power in Key U.S. Government

Stich had hired two attorneys to protect his interests: Las Vegas attorney Joshua Landish and San Francisco-area attorney Vernon Bradley. They too, joined the unprecedented series of lawyers that acted to support the scheme  by a powerful force in the federal government. The total of these unprecedented events were unknown in any modern  industrial nation  and a frightening indication of a grave condition subverting the inner fabric of the U.S. government.

 At that time, Stich was not aware of the massive corruption existing in the bankruptcy courts that involve Department of Justice trustees, federal judges, and attorneys that cooperating and benefit from joining the coalition.

DOJ Personnel and Federal Judges Corruptly
Seized Assets That Funded Corruption-Fighting

With immunity for high-level crimes well established, no fear of retaliation anywhere in government, the conspirators, including the most powerful groups in government, had self-granted unlimited immunity. The next stage was finishing off the corruption fighter, who at nearly 70 years of age, had no chance to recuperate. Again, two lawyers that Stich had paid to prevent the taking of his assets, acted on behalf of the scheme.

Another of Captain Stich's Attorney Joined the Scheme Involving
DOJ Personnel, California Judges, and Federal Judges

Without Stich's knowledge—and obvious to bankruptcy judge Robert Jones as he stated in court that Stich will be unhappy when he hears of this—attorney Joshua Landish urged Judge Jones to seize and liquidate the $10 million in the financially-sound real estate assets.

Court transcripts show Las Vegas bankruptcy judge, Robert Jones, and Stich's own Las Vegas attorney, Joshua Landish, discussing the seizure and liquidation of Stich's $10 million in assets (1980s value). That conversation occurred after the judge had already stated he intended to provide the relief that Stich had requested.

Partial court transcript of September 28, 1987:

Landish: Joshua Landis for the debtor.

Court: Let's see, what did we resolve last time, that we were about to dismiss the case, and gave you a little time to get some protection. The protection was obtaining refinancing to pay off the mortgage loans that had come due, before dismissal. (The relief requested was the removal of the California lis pendens in the sham lawsuit that prevented the refinancing of loans that had come due: the precise reason why Captain Stich sought relief in the bankruptcy courts).

Landish: I want to state as representative of the estate that I was always curious why the court ... [abstained?] I disagree with the court, but this case is one case that I have ever handled that is crying for the appointment of a trustee for the simple reason that I have observed that the court that here is a man that is willing to cut off his nose to spite his face. The estate is certainly recognizable. There is certainly no question we shouldn't be where we are but, the continual pin-pricks between this court, the state court, and even the consolidation  where we can get the job done. We have a trustee ... I believe, we  can either sell the properties, reorganize, apart from Mr. Stich, Mrs. Stich, they can get aid, and Mr. Stich can get what's left. Otherwise, I can assure the estate will be dissipated as one takes here and one takes there, there is no central voice controlling the ...

Judge: Guardian. Nevertheless, I will appoint a trustee pending the November 10th hearing. The trustee will have extensive authority to sign documents.

Explanation of the Facts

An apparent prior agreement appeared to exist between Judge Robert Jones and Las Vegas attorney Joshua Landish. Judge Jones made a decision 180 degrees from the prior decision that he knew would seize a financially sound real estate assets, and convert the 70-year old Captain Stich from a multimillionaire to a state of poverty.

The estate had no financial problems. It was the sham lawsuit and the lis pendens placed on the estate filed by the CIA-front San Francisco law firm, Friedman, Sloan and Ross, that constituted  the problem. Judge Jones had a duty to provide federal defenses that would have immediately settled the problem.

Captain Stich paid thousands of dollars to Landish to carry out Captain Stich's request for removal of the lis pendens. Then, behind Stich's back, Landish joined the scheme that now included the original Department of Justice personnel and now included large segments of the 

(Judge Robert Jones was later promoted to U.S. District Judge in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada; DOJ prosecutor David Levi, who was part of  the conspiracy, was promoted to a federal district court judge at Sacramento, California; U.S. District Judge Michael Mukasey was promoted to U.S. Attorney General of the United States; and U.S. Attorney Eric Holder, Jr., who blocked Captain Stich's attempts to halt the corruption that had already resulted in a series of terrorist successes District of Columbia action, 95-2260 CRR), was later promoted to U.S. Attorney General of the United States by President Barack Obama.)

Transferring Case to Oakland,
Where the Judicial Corruption Continued

The bankruptcy case was then transferred to Oakland, California, where it was turned over to Department of Justice trustee, Charles Duck. For decades, Duck was looting bankruptcy assets. While the Department of Justice trustee was looting Stich's assets, local San Francisco newspapers were revealing how the DOJ trustee was looting bankru0ptcvy court assets and committing the worst trustee fraud in history. 

Criminal Contempt of Court Charge For Exercising Legal and
 Constitutional Right to Object To Seizure of Life Assets

In accordance with the laws and Constitution of the United States, Stich filed an objection to the corrupt seizure of his assets, without cause, in violation of due process, and part of a criminal or RICO operation. After Stich filed an objection, federal bankruptcy judge Edward Jellen at Oakland charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for filing that defense. (Jones had previously issued an illegal order, as done by over half a dozen other federal district judges, voiding all legal and constitutional rights to federal defenses. (These matters are detailed in a chapter from the book, Defrauding America.)

Media Attention Reported DOJ Trustee
In Nation's Worst Trustee Corruption

Media publicity forced Department of Justice personnel to file minor charges against Duck, sentencing him to a short term in a minimum security detention center. After being criminally charged, federal judges awarded Charles Duck funds from the liquidation of Stich's assets.

Murder of Attorney Reporting Corruption
In the Same Bankruptcy Courts

While Stich was experiencing these events, a San Rafael attorney, Dexter Jacobson, had an appointment with FBI agents at San Francisco, the purpose of which was to provide evidence of the corruption that Stich was also experiencing. Primary people at risk were dozens of federal judges and Department of Justice personnel in bankruptcy court proceedings. The Monday morning appointment never occurred: Jacobson was murdered during the day before the meeting and his computerized records were missing.

While these matters were occurring, Department of Justice personnel in the Boston and New York City offices were involved with crime figures James "Whitey" Bulger in the Boston  offices, and with Gregory Scarpa, Sr., in the New York City offices, in the murders of U.S. citizens, reflecting  the culture of the people in control of the U.S. Department of Justice that Captain Stich had encountered for the prior 20 years.

Relief Sought from Supreme Court Justices

In 1988, Captain Stich filed a lawsuit that ended in the U.S. Supreme Court (Case No. 88-1452). The lawsuit addressed the illegal and unconstitutional seizure of his life assets, under criminal conditions, after the judges in the Ninth Circuit appellate courts at San Francisco (including Court of Appeals Judge Anthony Kennedy) had approved the seizure and denied relief.

Two of the defendants named in that lawsuit were U.S. Department of Justice Trustee Charles Duck and Oakland bankruptcy judge Edward Jellen. (In effect, the personnel in control of the U.S. Department of Justice and judges in the federal courts were the corruption-fighter's adversaries, and now relief was sought from a segment of that judicial system!)

One brief filed in the U.S. Supreme Court, titled "Opposition of Respondent, Charles Duck, Trustee, to Petition for Writ of Certiorari." It was submitted by the private law firm of Goldberg, Stinnett & Macdonald of San Francisco, representing Duck. .

Legal Filings Related to Asset Seizure

Stich filed another petition for relief to U.S. Supreme Court, August 15, 1994, seeking relief from the judicial seizure of $10 million in assets that funded exposure of the corruption in government offices. He again filed on September 5, 1994, a  petition to the Supreme Court Justices seeking orders to halt the illegal and unconstitutional property seizure. Again, the Supreme Court Justices approved the unprecedented and criminal misuse of government positions by the judges and personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice. During these efforts, including the looting of Stich's life assets seized, the corruption that Captain Stich and his group were seeking to expose and halt were enabling a series of al Qaeda successes.

Another Criminal Contempt of Court Charge By
San Francisco Federal Judge Vaughn Walker

As Captain Rodney Stich was being released from the first prison sentence, and stripped of his life assets, and being evicted from his home, another criminal contempt of court charge was filed against him by San Francisco federal judges Marilyn Patel and Vaughn Walker, for an earlier attempt to report the criminal activities in a federal court outside of the Ninth Circuit. An order was rendered limiting Stich primarily to his rented dwelling.

Four years later, in 1995, the criminal contempt of court charge was suddenly cancelled without explanation. Possibly motivating the dropping of criminal contempt of court charges was the worsening of the catastrophic events, made possible by the corruption in government positions that Captain Stich and his group had discovered, tried to report and halt, and for which he was targeted by possibly the nation's most encompassing conspiracy to  silence a whistleblower and

Even worse was yet to come.

Additional $500,000 Stolen
By DOJ Trustee

An additional $500,000 was stolen by the Department of Justice trustee. These funds were distributed in financial institutions at Reno, Nevada, in the name of several corporations that were not a part of any of the proceedings, and not known by his adversaries to exist. While Stich was in prison on the sham criminal contemp0t of court charge his vacant home was searched by Department of Justice trustee and his representatives. They found records of the funds and with the control they had over virtually any state or federal agency, they obtained the funds and all records eliminated showing the funds existed.

Stich's records of these funds were on the early floppy disks, and they were all deleted. That literal unelected secret government was able to remove the funds from five different financial institutions even though they had no authorization to do so. All evidence showing the deposits were gone. Stich's inquiry to the financial institutions where the funds were placed came back claiming they had no record of them.

No other modern nation has such a secret government openly acting like a criminal organization and the public kept unaware of what was being done. They also were treated like an American feeding trough for the elite in government!

Unprecedented Lawsuit Named the Justices
Of U.S. Supreme Court as Defendants

The complicity in these events by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court caused Captain Stich to file a lawsuit against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court (Oct 20, 1989, Nr. 89-2941) in the federal courts in New York City. The federal causes of action included:

  • Repeated cover-ups of the harmful violations of the Civil Rights statutes by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities.

  • Repeated complicity in the cover-up by federal judges  of criminal conduct that was continuing  to result in grave harm to the people and the nation.

  • Repeated obstruction of justice as they were made aware of the criminal activities; and were  made aware of the felony obstruction of justice by federal judges under their supoervisi8on,

  • Repeated cover-up of the great and irreparable personal and financial harm inflicted on Captain Stich in an effort to silence his exposure of high level corruption unprecedented in any modern nation.

  • Sporkin immediately issued an order dismissing the lawsuit on January 17, 1990. In response, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court requested a summary affirmance dismissal of the appeal, stating they were totally immune from being sued. Stich filed an opposition to that motion, May 22, 1990. Reply appeal brief in response to motion to dismiss, July 9, 1992. That was denied. Stich filed a notice of appeal with the entire U.S. Court of Appeals en banc. Surprise! the Supreme Court Justices were again protected. The Justices' reply to the lawsuit raised the defense that the Justices were immune from lawsuits. Nothing was said to deny the validly of the charges—as in prior or subsequent lawsuits. The price was continuation of the high level corruption and a worsening of the consequences in a series of al Qaeda attacks.|

    The lawsuit naming the Supreme Court Justices as defendants had never been done before. Its purpose was to force attention on the charges, including corruption in powerful government offices; the harm inflicted or enabled by those corrupt acts, and the literal subversion of basic rights and protections by the same people entrusted to protect those rights and protections.

    Prima Facie Evidence of a RICO Criminal Enterprise

    The conduct of the federal judges far exceeded the legal and criminal criteria for calling them a RICO criminal enterprise. State judges have been prosecuted in the past for conduct far less than shown here, with the consequences at the federal level beyond any criminal offense in the nation's history.

    Criminal statutes do not provide immunity against the criminal acts of any government personnel. Especially by those people entrusted to prevent such crimes: personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice, federal judges, and Supreme Court Justices.

    U.S. Media Corporations Protected the Literal RICO Enterprise

    Media personnel and media corporations were aware of every matter stated here, for decades, and kept the information from the people. They did this for decades with CIA drug smuggling.

    Suing DOJ Trustee, Bankruptcy Judges,
    And the Enabling Supreme Court Justices

     Captain Rodney Stich filed a subsequent lawsuit in the federal courts in New York City, March 3, 1990 (90 CIV 3164) naming as defendants the group most directly responsible for the illegal and unconstitutional seizure of his life assets—under evidence of a joint criminal operation:

    A Fitting Menagerie of Defendants

    • Department  of Justice Trustees, Charles Duck (who was sent to prison) and his replacement, Anthony Souza.
    • Oakland bankruptcy judge Edward Jellen and Las Vegas bankruptcy judge Robert Jones.

    • Supreme Court Justices William Rehnquist; Antonin Scalia; Sandra O'Connor; Anthony Kennedy; Thurgood Marshall; William Brennan; John Stevens; Bryon White; Henry Blackmun.

    The complaint stated multiple facts showing the seizure of the corruption-fighter's life assets, violating the requirement for a notice of hearing, a hearing, honesty, and the details showing that the seizure met the criteria for a corrupt and criminal seizure, and without due process.

    Void Orders Under Supreme Court Decisions

    Under landmark decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, a judgment/order rendered without due process is a void order, and all subsequent orders based on that void order area also void. A federal action can be filed at any time, in any federal court, to regain what was lost in the void order. Under the present corrupt conditions in the federal courts, such action would be doomed. And be filed after Stich is long deceased.

    The filing that required the judge to conduct hearings was followed instead by the standard no-hearing dismissal, using the sham frivolous label.

    Combining Appeal With Reporting Addition Corruption

    The corruption-fighter was continuing to receive new information from his increasing number of insiders about corruption, plus the increasing discovery of corruption-enabled terrorist successes. Without funds, Stich filed a request to file an appeal forma pauperis, without the filing fee. The title on the motion: Forma Pauperis to file Notice of Appeal, and file 18 USC § 4 report on federal Crimes. The motion was approved, and he filed his appeal brief (90civ3164 and 92-6164) on July 24, 1992.

    Department of Justice personnel then filed a Defendants-Appellees brief, August 31, 1992. That filing was dismissed without the due process and legal requirement of notice of a hearing and a hearing.

    Secret CIA-Funded Bank Account For
    Federal Judge Stanley Sporkin

    CIA personnel had described to Stich the close relationship of CIA personnel and federal judges. CIA general Counsel Stanley Sporkin, as an example, became a federal judge in the powerful District of Columbia courts. Records provided to Stich by the head of a covert CIA operation based in Honolulu, BBRDW, showed that Sporkin was among a group of other federal personnel having secret bank accounts  in covert CIA financial operations that were corruptly funded by the CIA.

    In several of Captain Stich's books, including Defrauding America, and Explosive Secrets of Covert CIA Companies, Stich reported this discovery that he made while examining boxes of CIA documents obtained from a secret CIA operation based in Honolulu, known as BBRDW. The boxes were given to Stich by the former titular head of that CIA operation, and by the San Francisco law office of Melvin Belli. Those boxes contained an envelope containing a hand-written list with the names of people, and their code names, having secret CIA bank accounts funded by the CIA

    CIA-Funded Secret Bank Accounts For
    Top U.S. Politicians and Judges

    Among the more recognized names on the list of secret bank accounts were Vice-President George Bush; Richard Armitage, and Stanley Sporkin. Armitage was a United States Deputy Secretary of State at the State Department. From 1983 to 1989, he was Assistant Secretary of Defense. The code name for Sporkin's account was Slimy Affirm. That code name for Sporkin may have been due to the dislike for Sporkin.

    Emergency Petition Reporting Massive Corruption,
    Retaliation, National Tragedies—and Unprecedented
    Apology By Supreme Court Justice Byron White

    The corruption and the consequences were worsening. Terrorist successes were starting to occur from the existing corruption, cover-ups, and retaliation. While the lawsuit against the Supreme Court Justices was still in the courts, Captain Stich, in 1991, sent a 60-page Emergency Petition to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron White.  Justice White had a reputation for a high level of integrity. His unprecedented response indicated his concern for the charges made in that Emergency Petition.

    Justice White's unprecedented personal response, dated October 28, 1991, reflected his concern, as he apologized in writing for not being able—as  single Justice—to help.

    It was surely the first time in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court that one of the Justices, informed of crimes against the United States, resulting in great tragedies and threatening the security of the nation, put in words his concern and inability to help in such important matters. What powerful force kept him from acting on such serious nation-affecting matters?

    Powerful Force in the Federal Government

    That response strongly suggested a powerful force existed that required the U.S. Supreme Court Justices to become complicit in criminal activities that had, and would continue to have, catastrophic consequences. Shortly after that October 1991 letter, Justice White retired shortly thereafter, in early 1993. He died on April 16, 2002.

    Byron White and Rodney Stich had Simultaneous World War II Service.

    Justice White was in the U.S. Navy during World War II, serving in the Pacific theater of operations. Captain Stich, was also in the U.S. Navy, during World War II, in the same Pacific theatre of operations. Stich was the youngest Navy Patrol Plane Commander during that time period.

    (President George Bush (Sr.) received his Navy wings at the Naval Air Station at Corpus Christi at about the same time as Stich received his Navy wings at Pensacola. Bush claims he was the youngest navy pilot in World War II, beating Stich by several months. However, while Bush was a single-engine pilot, Stich was the youngest Patrol Plane Commander, a very prestigious position held by a very few limited pilots.)

    Sampling of Events Occurring While DOJ Personnel
    And Federal Judges Were Blocking Efforts To
    Halt the Enabling Corruption

    During the relentless efforts of Captain Stich, the results of the culture of corruption in powerful government positions increased, and the areas of resulting harm that he and his group discovered also expanded. For instance:


    Last Judicial Filings Prior to September 11, 2001,
    Listing Corruption That Would Make 9/11 Possible

    The consequences were becoming so dire, and involved people in control of the most powerful offices in the U.S. government, that Captain Stich continued his efforts. As the terrorist successes continued, made possible by the widespread corruption Stich was reporting, the corruption-fighter filed another lawsuit in the federal courts at Oakland, California. Despite the gravity of the charges made in that lawsuit, federal judges refused to file it.

    Stich then filed the lawsuit in the federal courts at Reno. Being further removed from the federal courts in California, the Reno lawsuit did not encounter the immediate dismissal. However, every request for the defendants to respond to interrogatives and allow the action to proceed were blocked by U.S. District Judge Edward Reed. Even after 9/11 occurred, while the lawsuit was in progress, and showed another tragedy made possible by the corruption, Judge Reed dismissed the action. The judges in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco continued their approval of the unlawful dismissal as they had done since the 1970s.

    Urgent Letters and Emergency Petitions Sent Direct
    To Supreme Court Justices In 2001—Prior to 9/11

    Stich sent a certified letter to Justice Anthony Kennedy on Jan. 2, 2001, describing the serious matters. No response. Other urgent letters were sent—prior to September 11, 2001. They included a certified letter to Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, January 2, 2001, with copies to each of the other Justices. A certified letter to Justice Clarence Thomas, January 15, 2001, combined with emergency petition for relief. No response. The letter stated in part:

    "The judicial corruption continues to make possible the infliction of grave harm upon the United States, undermining the rights and protections under the laws and Constitution of the United States, and subverts the internal security of the United States. ... The enclosed petition for extraordinary writ is being submitted to you because of the refusal by Justice Sandra O’Connor to respond to a prior petition sent to her under Supreme Court Rule 22. ... These are matters that fall within the areas of supervisory responsibilities of Supreme Court Justices, and under federal civil rights and criminal statutes. Misuse of the federal courts in the Ninth Circuit as a racketeering enterprise."

    Stich sent Emergency Petitions to others, none of whom responded:

    Certified letters, April 11, 2001, sent to Chief Justice Rehnquist and each of the Justices of the Supreme Court.

    Lying and Deception by Federal Judges

    Federal judges engaged in lying and deception to block the reporting of the corruption and block federal defenses to halt the great personal and financial harm that federal judges were inflicting upon him. Their tactics:

    • Stating and implying that Captain's Stich's reports on criminal activities were frivolous and that of a vexatious litigant.

    • Issuing illegal and unconstitutional orders terminating his access to the federal courts, ending for him the so-called "liberty and justice for all" as is euphemistically stated in the pledge of allegiance.

    • Conspiracy with Department of Justice personnel in the sham lawsuit filed in the California courts.

    • Sentencing him to six months in federal prison for filing a federal action reporting the deadly corruption and for exercising federal defenses to halt the awesome personal and property losses being inflicted upon him in a conspiracy unknown in any other modern nation.

    • Seizing his assets through blatant violations of federal and constitutional protections, as part of a criminal conspiracy.

    Most Horrific Corruption-Enabled
    Terrorist Successes In U.S. History: 9/11

    The horrific hijackings of four U.S. airliners on September 11, 2001, events started with four groups of hijackers boarding four different airliners at approximately the same time. Soon after takeoff, hijackers seized the cockpit door keys from vulnerable flight attendants, entered the cockpit unannounced, and used their knives to disable or kill the pilots. They then took control of the aircraft.

    Worse Consequences in Nation's History From Criminal
    Misconduct of Non-Elected Government Personnel

    There had never been, in the nation's history, the colossal consequences of any criminal conduct as happened on September 11, 2001. That tragedy was made worse by the sheer number of enablers, any one of whom could have prevented the horrors on that day—and what would follow—if they had only spoken out. Making this worse, there were a series of advance notices of the planned attacks that were deep-sixed by officials in the U.S. Department of Justice for self-serving purposes. The success of each prior al Qaeda attack showed the consequences of continuing to deep-six the advance information.

    Post-9/11 Judicial Cover-Up in DC Courts
    Every Federal Judge Participated

    Captain Stich sought to report the corruption that enabled the 9/11 hijackings by submitting a federal action to the federal court in Washington, DC, on April 22, 2002. That action was submitted under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. It addressed the serious federal offenses by personnel in control of the U.S. Department of Justice, the decades of problems in the Federal Aviation Administration, and elsewhere.

    When Captain Stich never received the file-stamped copy, he sent a letter to the clerk of the court, June 20, 2002, questioning why the filing was only stamped "received." District Judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly then issued an  order, July 1, 2002, that blocked filing the petition and even denying him the right to appeal the illegal act. Stich sent a letter to  judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly, Aug. 12, 2002, requesting an explanation for refusing to file the lawsuit. No response, despite the enormity of the issues.

    Stich filed a statement of issues in the notice of appeal, Sep. 30, 2002. He then submitted for filing an appeal brief, December 6, 2002, which was stamped "received December 9, 2002." The appellate judges, fully aware of the gravity of the charges, issued an order dated January 16, 2003, refusing to hear the appeal on the basis of Judge Stanley Sporkin's order 11 years earlier, permanently barring Stich access to the federal courts. The severity of the corruption had reached monumental proportions.

    It was Stanley Sporkin who, a confidential document of a covert CIA operation based in Honolulu (BBRDW), showed having a secret CIA bank account funded by the Central Intelligence Agency.

    Stich filed an appeal brief with the court of appeals for an en banc hearing. Every appellate judge in the most powerful and influential federal appeal court in the nation was then aware of the serious charges. The enbanc appeal was stamped "received" on January 27, 2003.

    The entire appellate court then issued a May 15, 2003, order refusing to hear the matter, signed by court of appeal judges Edwards, Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel, and Garland. That refusal enabled the culture of corruption-criminality to continue. That order insured that the corrupt conduct and corrupt culture that enabled 9/11 would continue.

    Extra Special Reason for Judicial and DOJ
     Cover-Ups In New York City

    There were extra special reasons federal judges and  Department of Justice personnel to block Captain Stich's federal filing in New York City:

    Forty years prior to  the  September 11, 2001, al Qaeda hijackings—which were world-record aviation disasters, there was another world-record aviation disaster into the Brooklyn section of New York City. That was a United Airlines DC-8. That December 16, 1960, aviation disaster was preceded by enabling corruption. The September 11, 2001, aviation disasters into New York City was preceded by far worse corruption—probably made worse by the cover-ups and culture of protecting the perpetrators when they are a part of the ruling oligarchy.

    Even More Unprecedented

    The occurrence of that 1960 airline disaster and several more, near-disasters, caused a safety segment of the Federal Aviation Agency to give an unprecedented and official life-and-death-assignment, transferring from Los Angeles to Denver,  where the airline experiencing a world record number of airline disasters had their training and competence-check facilities. That inspector was Rodney Stich.

    Stich quickly discovered the safety problems and corruption at the airline  that enabled the crashes and near-crashes to occur. He  also quickly learned why the problems and the corruption existed: the politically-powerful airline and the political personnel in the Federal Aviation Agency.

    As Stich discovered, reported, and attempted to carry out his life-and-death assignment, he came under attack, primarily from powerful management personnel within the FAA. Every relevant segment of the FAA was used against Stich. While under attack, three additional fatal airline disasters occurred, each one enabled by the same problems that Stich had report5ed and attempted to correct. One of those disasters, occurring at Salt Lake City, where 43 passengers were cremated alive, was a textbook example  of how corruption in the FAA resulted in crashes, one of many examples of why the FAA was refereed to by knowledgeable insiders as the "tombstone agency."

    Deadly Similarities

    In the 1960 world-record aviation disaster in New York City, there were enabling corruption and  cover-ups, and Stich was assigned to correct the problems. In the 2001 New York City world-record aviation disaster, the enabling causes were corrupt conduct, reported by the same Captain Rodney Stich, under attack, again, to silence him.

    Post-9/11 Judicial Cover-Up in New York City Courts:
    Every Federal Judge Participated

    After the filing was blocked by every level in the federal courts in the District of Columbia, Captain Stich submitted for filing a lawsuit in the federal courts in New York, dated August 8, 2002. The judicial obstruction of justice continued. Even though the filing met the guidelines and the filing fee was enclosed, and criminal conduct under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, was stated, and federal judges had a mandatory duty to receive the information, the explosive document was not filed.

    The document was stamped as "received" (August 8, 2002). Chief Judge Michael Mukasey refused to allow it to be filed. To have filed the document would have exposed impeachable and criminal misconduct of people in control. of the most powerful positions in government, and extended far beyond. The culture of corruption continued, with even worse consequences, totally unknown by the American people.

    Judicial Obstruction of Justice Reported To
    All U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    After nearly a year of attempting to get the case filed, Stich sent a February 6, 2003, letter to Chief Justice William Rehnquist, and each of the other Supreme Court Justices. The letters advised the Supreme Court Justices of the latest judicial obstruction of justice that was occurring in areas for which they had supervising responsibilities.

    Endless Judicial Deception—with Supreme Court Justices' Complicity

    Thirteen months after that explosive document should have been filed, and seven months after the Supreme Court Justices were notified, Chief Judge Michael Mukasey then allowed the filing to occur, on September 22, 2003. After those letters were sent, he was apparently secretly ordered by the Supreme Court Justices to file the action. The Justices surely knew, or instructed, what happened next.

    Immediately upon Judge Mukasey allowing the action to be filed—he simultaneously filed an order, September 22, 2003, dismissing the action. That tactic continued the years of impeachable offenses by federal judges, making possible what then followed.

    Notice of Appeal to Court of Appeals in New York City—
    The Site of Two World-Record Aviation Disasters:
    40 Years Apart

    Captain Rodney Stich filed a Notice of Appeal, Oct. 14, 2003, of the unlawful dismissal by Chief Judge Michael Mukasey. Under federal court procedural rules, Stich filed an Appeal Brief on January 3, 2004

    Department of Justice personnel were then required to file their brief. When they failed to do that, probably wondering what to do next, Stich filed a Declaration of Filing Irregularities, Feb. 23, 2004. Department of Justice personnel then filed a motion to dismiss the action—in which they played a major enabling role to the criminal acts stated therein.

    Stich then filed his Reply Brief, Feb. 29, 2004, to their filing. DOJ response was to file a motion to dismiss. In response to the DOJ motion to dismiss, Stich filed an Objection to Dismissal, June 3, 2004.

    The court of appeals issued instructions for the parties to give oral arguments in the federal courts in New York City. The Oral Argument occurred on August 24, 2004. Continuing  the same tactics started in the 1970s, as the three appeal judges dismissed the attempt to provide evidence relating to the corrupt and criminal enabling misconduct that made the easily prevented and forewarned hijackings of four airline aircraft possible.

    Stich filed a Petition for Rehearing on September 7, 2004, en banc, before all the appellate judges. Every federal appellate judges in New York City than denied the appeal, increasing the complicity in the federal judicial system.

    World Record Aviation Disasters into New York City:
    40 Years Apart: Both Enabled by Corruption!

    Summation of legal actions from New York City filings:

    Another Cover-Up by Supreme Court Justices

    Stich submitted for filing to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices petition for writ of certiorari and writ of mandamus. January 5, 2005, petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court. The introductory "Questions Presented" section of that brief stated:

    Questions Presented To
    U.S.  Supreme Court Justices

          Petitioner presents the following questions for review:

    1.   Whether federal judges can legally block Petitioner, or any other former federal agent, or citizen, from reporting federal crimes under the mandatory requirement of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.[1]

    2.  Whether judicial orders permanently barring Petitioner from filing any papers in the federal district and appellate courts, deprives him of the fundamental rights and protections guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States.

    3.  Whether federal judges can issue unlawful and unconstitutional orders that inflict great and irreparable personal and financial harm upon Petitioner, and then issue unlawful and unconstitutional orders preventing him from exercising legal and constitutional defenses.

    4.  Whether the abundance of documentary evidence indicates that judicial orders terminating Petitioner’s exercise of legal and constitutional protections were intended, and acted, to prevent Petitioner from reporting criminal conduct of government officials, and deprive Petitioner the protections intended by U.S. laws and Constitution.

    5.  Whether Petitioner’s attempt to protect national interests by reporting federal crimes, and exercising federal defenses against violations of federally protected rights, met the legal definition of frivolous filings of a vexatious litigant—or a tactic to block him from reporting deadly misconduct by people in government positions.

    6.  Whether federal district and appellate judges can legally and constitutionally permanently terminate Petitioner’s legal and constitutional right to file papers in federal district, which then terminates the rights and protections guaranteed to all other people.

    7.  Whether the acts of district and appellate court justices constitute a racketeering enterprise.

    8.  Whether federal judges can order the seizure and liquidation of Petition’s $10 million in lifetime assets, without a hearing, without notice of hearing, without legally recognized cause.

    9.  Whether orders can thereafter be rendered barring Petitioner from filing objections to such seizure and liquidation, and then, when objections are filed, they are ordered unfilled, and Petitioner charged with criminal contempt of court for exercising such legal and constitutional rights.

    10.Whether the obstruction of justice acts by federal judges enabled to occur the conditions that made it possible for terrorists to hijack four airliners on September 11, 2001, among other preventable national tragedies.

           [1] Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.


    The usual cover up followed—and  the normal worsening of events occurred.

    9/11 Commission Cover-Ups Enabled By
    Embedded Department of Justice Personnel

    The last cover-up by the Supreme Court Justices enabled the continuation of the corruption in the 9/11 Commission;. The commission included the Department of Justice personnel who had been part of the deep-sixing of advance notice of the series of al Qaeda attacks, the primary and direct enablers of the  hijackings, deaths, and what would follow. Their conduct also protected other 9/11 enablers, insuring  that they would continue the secrecy. Partial list of letters to the 9/11 Commission.

    The controlling government oligarchy then covered up for the  true enablers of the 9/11 attacks (as they did in covering up prior al Qaeda successes, and the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie). Calamitous consequences than followed, worse than the 9/11 hijackings.

    Obvious Reason for al Qaeda Attacks
    Unrecognized by American Public

    The relatively small group of Al Qaeda members repeatedly stated they were attacking U.S. targets because of the brutalities inflicted upon the Palestinians in the invaded and annexed land by Israel. Those brutalities were made possible by the funding, arming, and support by U.S. politicians—a fact not recognized by the American public.

    The primary reason for the public's failure to recognize the role of Israel and American politicians in the most horrific terrorist attacks in the nation's history is the withholding  of this obvious  information by members of Congress and the lapdog U.S. media.

    Even after the 9/11 attacks (and after the  earlier al Qaeda attacks), members of the U.S. Congress and  the mainstream U.S. media continued to support and approve of the brutalities upon the Palestinians.

    Even after Israel attacked and murdered U.S. Navy personnel on the USS Liberty, members of Congress, Israel's proxies in the United States, continued to defend the actions. Again and again, the illiterate American public, when it comes to the  conduct of the powerful oligarchy in the U.S. government, are blissfully content  to continue to function as the feeding trough for the elite in the elected and nonelected personnel in government.

    A danger to Israel, resulting from their brutalities upon the Palestinians, were the other nations in the Middle East. As long as the other nations were functioning governments under rulers that maintained stability and opposed the history of violence among the different tribes, religions, and other groups, Israel was at risk.

    Response by U.S. Politicians to 9/11 Produced Almost
    Indefensible Threat in the Nation's History

    U.S. politicians were fully aware of the reason for al Qaeda's attacks, including the September 11, 2001  hijackings—in which they were enabler through making possible Israel's attacks on the Palestinians. U.S. politicians knew of the:

    Instead off addressing the primary enablers that made possible the 9/11 attacks, which would include themselves, U.S. politicians, led by President George Bush (Jr.) and his neocons, started two deadly wars against Afghanistan and Iraq. Neither nation had any knowledge or complicity in the attacks.

    These U.S. politicians already knew the anger and consequences resulting from the Israeli-American brutalities upon the  mostly defenseless and occupied Palestinians. Those U.S. politicians had  to know that the murders of tens of thousands of Afghans and Iraqi, including children, would greatly increase the justifiable anger of people throughout the Middle, and in much of the world.

    The horrific killing of innocent people with the U.S. invasion of  Afghanistan and Iraq justifiably outraged people throughout the Middle East  and Africa—as could be expected. Al Qaeda members made clear that their attacks upon U.S. targets resulted from their concern and outrage over the Israel brutalities inflicted upon the Palestinians by Israel, funded, armed, and supported by the United States (subservient U.S. politicians acting as proxies for Israel's Zionist leaders).

    Coincidentally with the murders—or deliberately—the collapse of the Iraq government pleased Israel.

    The "shock and awe" murders of thousands of innocent people also caused the collapse of order under Saddam Hussain, under whom Iraq was one of the Middle East most westernized nations, where the citizens no longer experienced the standard fighting between groups, and was a major block to the existence of terrorists (as it subsequently became a terrorist haven after the invasion).

     Afghanistan, recovered from years of civil wars by the religious (and brutal) Taliban, returned to the prior civil war between groups.

    Hoard of 9/11 Enablers Were Protected
    By America's Ruling Oligarchy

    There were multiple enablers of  the terrorist successes that resulted in 3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001. Each group has varying levels of blame or criminality:

    Primary, Direct, and Criminal Enablers: High officials in U.S. Department of Justice:

    • Department of Justice personnel received advance notice of the series of planned al Qaeda attacks from a reliable source: Gregory Scarpa, Jr, in the al Qaeda index headed by al Qaeda operative Ramzi Yousef. That mole and his New York City attorney periodically provided the information to FBI-DOJ personnel in the New York City offices, and considered extremely important by local agents.

    • High-level DOJ officials in Washington deep-sixth the highly critical advance information because of a prior scheme to discredit the mole's sworn testimony concerning the murders that his Mafia capo father committed over several years with the complicity of FBI-DOJ personnel. (Similar to the FBI-DOJ personnel misconduct in the Boston FBI-DOJ offices with mobster James "Whitey" Bulger.)

    Secondary Primary Enablers: Decades of
    Incompetence, Politics, and Corruption in the FAA

    The corrupt culture in the Federal Aviation Administration that former FAA airline safety inspector Rodney Stich repeatedly reported to federal judges was repeatedly covered up. That that obstruction of justice practice by federal judges, documented from the 1970s, played repeated enabling roles in fraud-enabled airline disasters and the human tragedies associated with them.

    Decades of Red Flags Revealing the Simplicity Of
    Hijacking U.S. Airliners: Ignored by FAA Management

    A simple order by FAA management, prohibiting cabin flight attendants from having keys to the cockpit—obvious for decades when hijackings in the United States were frequent occurrences—would have prevented those hijackings, prevented the 3,000 horrific deaths, and eliminated the two wars and other calamities that followed. Another example of the "tombstone agency" culture.

    Almost 3,000 people endured these horrific events. If the American public knew of the corruption that preceded and enabled those events, especially the corruption of personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice, the hoard of corrupt federal judges, and the complicity of the Supreme Court Justices, the reaction of any responsible public could have had devastating consequences for those people in control of the U.S. government oligarchy. Cover-up was essential—followed by even worse consequences.

    Primary Indirect Enablers: Federal judges

    From the 1970s, federal judges repeatedly blocked the reporting of criminal acts that were reported by a corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, whose background and credibility justified examining his information. These federal judges had a mandatory responsibility under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, to receive the information. Instead, their deliberate obstruction of justice was shown by judicial records:

    1. In every one of over a dozen federal filings, federal judges blocked the reports, despite the ongoing consequences in aviation disasters, terrorist successes, and other harm.

    2. Federal judges issued over half a dozen illegal and unconstitutional orders barring the corruption-fighter from any filing in any district or appellant court. They knew those illegal orders would prevent him and his sources from meeting the responsibility, and citizens right,  to report corruption in government personnel.

    3. Federal judges and Department of Justice personnel charged Captain Rodney Stich with criminal contempt of court after he sought to report criminal activities that he and his sources had personally discovered. Their intent was obviously a deadly obstruction of justice tactic. (The importance of the information was implied by the status of the sources. Examples: former heads of secret CIA airliners and CIA financial corporations.)

    Federal judges charged Captain Stich with criminal contempt of court when he filed a legal defense against the seizure of his life assets, a taking without the legal and constitutional requirement of a  hearing and cause, and done, as shown by the court's transcript, in a criminal manner.

    Federal judges aiding and abetting the DOJ scheme that started with a sham lawsuit filed by the CIA-front San Francisco law firm, Friedman, Sloan and Ross, in the California courts. That sham lawsuit violated dozens of California and federal statutes and decisional laws, landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions, making claims that the straw plaintiff continued to deny.

    Supreme Court Justices

    Since the 1970s, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were made aware, through legal submissions and through letters, of:

    Federal Judges Blocking the Reports of Federal Crimes by individuals or groups in:

    • The Federal Aviation Administration and specific airline disasters.

    • The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), including massive drug smuggling; October Surprise operation that corrupted a presidential election; financial frauds; etc.

    35 Years Blocking Reports of Corruption
    And Resulting National Tragedies

    • Federal judges repeatedly, from the 1970s to 2005, refused to receive information on criminal activities in non-elected government positions, in open violations of their mandatory duty to receive the information under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.

    Aviation-Ignorant Judges Blocking Reports of Aviation Safety Corruption
    Discovered by Expert Officially Authorized to Make Such Determination

    • Federal judges protected the crash-enabling corruption in the government's aviation safety offices which I first discovered and documented after being given the unprecedented and official life-and-death-assignment

    Protecting the Perpetrators 

    • Federal judges protected the perpetrators of criminal activities, some being serious crimes against the United States, that made the nation vulnerable to terrorist successes. The series of terrorist successes included those perpetrated by the al Qaeda group.

    Enabling CIA Crimes, Including Middle East Hatred

    • Federal judges blocked the reports of CIA activities that helped generate Middle East hatred against the United States; CIA drug smuggling; and other crimes.

    Selective Termination of Liberty and Justice for All

    • Federal judges issued a series of illegal and unconstitutional orders permanently barring Captain Stich from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court, that knowingly and obviously were issued to block the reports of crimes against the United States and to deny Stich the federal defenses against the massive violations of federally protected rights—in the DOJ scheme to halt Stich's continuing efforts to halt the  corruption that he and his sources discovered during their official government duties.

    Self-Justified Massive Civil Rights Violator

    • Federal judges repeatedly, for years, violated their mandatory duties to provide relief against the massive civil rights violations by California judges from 1982 to 1988, and then the massive civil rights violations inflicted upon him by Department of Justice personnel and federal judges. Ironically, or criminally, the same group was paid and entrusted to prevent such violations and to provide a defense to halt the violations.

    Terminated Legal and Constitutional Right To
    Halt Serious Civil Rights Violations

    • Violated the legal and constitutional right to federal court access.

    Seizing Life Assets in Conspiracy
    While Voiding All Legal and Constitution Defenses

    • Federal judges, acting in a conspiracy with Department of Justice personnel, seized Captain Stich's life assets ($10 million in 1988 values), in gross violations of federal laws and constitutional protections, with evidence of a criminal conspiracy. One of those judges, Las Vegas judge Robert Jones, was thereafter promoted to a U.S. District Judge in Reno, despite his criminal misuse of judicial power, and his role in protecting the criminal activities that enabled the  series of al Qaeda successes.

    • Federal judges charted Stich with contempt of court when Stich exercised the legal and constitutional right to file objection to the seizure of his life assets, converting him from a multimillionaire to a state of poverty.

    • Federal judges, after the corruption that they repeated protected, resulted in the last in the series of al Qaeda successes, they continue the cover-up tactics. The federal judges in the District of Columbia courts refused to file the action because ten years earlier U.S. District Judge Stanley Sporkin labeled these legal attempts to be the frivolous and vexatious litigant! Immediately thereafter, the serious of catastrophic al Qaeda attacks started, with 9/11 in the series. (Captain Stich, in examining the  records from a covert CIA operation based in Honolulu (BBRDW), found  evidence of secret CIA bank accounts for powerful people in government; one of the recipients of such funds was Stanley Sporkin!)

    • Federal Judge Michael Mukasey, in the federal courts in New York City, then block the filing. It was only a year later, after Captain Stich sent personal letters to each of the Justices of the Supreme Court, advising them of the latest obstruction of Justice, that the filling was made. Immediately, on that date, violating court rules, violating the federal crime reporting statute, due process, without notice of the required hearing, and a hearing, that filing was dismissed.  The reason given:

    Key Enablers of Two Wars Against Totally Innocent Nations—
    While Protecting Themselves and Other 9/11 Enablers

    • The block to these filings submitted to the federal courts in the District of Columbia and in New York City enabled the real enablers of 9/11, in the U.S. government, to be protected. Instead, the deeply embedded culture of lies and corruption fed  to the American people included blaming the people of Afghanistan and Iraq. The federal judges that engaged in these latest judicial offenses became major enablers to the start of two deadly wars, further supported by U.S. politicians. If the federal judges had not blocked the post-9/11 filings, the truth would have been known by the American and the deception and start of two wars could not have been foisted upon the American public.

    Among Major Enablers of Middle East Tragedies:
    Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices

    • As judicial documents reveal, Federal judges—and the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court—became the latest enablers of:

      • The deaths of tens of thousands in Afghanistan and Iraq.

      • The implosion of previously functioning nations, including Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Libya, where terrorist activities were largely prevented, and then became a haven and breeding ground for terrorists, whose principal targets were Americans.

      • The growth of justifiable outrage by tens of millions in the Middle East area, which then led to the growth of brutal terrorist groups, far worse than the al Qaeda groups, including the Islamic State of Syria (ISIS), Boko Haram, and Al-Shabaab, and the millions of angered individuals.

    Personnel in corrupt control of the U.S. Department of Justice

    The greatest threat and source of direct harm to individual Americans are the people in control of the U.S. Department of Justice and the culture that exists. That personnel has changed the DOJ from an agency preventing all criminal acts (and the harmful consequences) to protecting the perpetrators of criminal acts when the perpetrators are key personnel in the U.S. government oligarchy.


    Through that heavily document misconduct, the personnel in control of the Department of Justice have became the enablers of much of the greatest harm to individual Americans, and to the United States, during the prior two decades, the greatest direct enablers of the worst terrorist successes in the nation's history. (The greatest generators of hatred, that resulted in the growth of people wanting to harm Americans, and that resulted in the terrorist attacks to this date against the United States, are U.S. politicians).


    Documented examples of the corrupted culture of people in control of the U.S. Department of Justice include:

    • Decades of complicity in murders with organized crime figures, as in the Boston and New York City offices.

    • Covering up for drug smuggling by CIA and Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) personnel  during the 1970s to 1990s.

    • Falsifying planted evidence in the investigation of the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103, shifting the blame from the two groups in Iran and Syria, and charging two innocent Libyans and Libya.

    • Deep-sixing advance information on a series of planned al Qaeda attacks (to cover up for its murders in the New York City offices), thereby enabling the success of the forewarned attacks.

    • Repeatedly blocking Captain Stich from reporting the corruption by key personnel in the U.S. government that he and his sources discovered, as part of their official duties.

    • Filing false criminal charges against present and former government personnel to discredit or block their reports of serious criminal activities in government. Examples:

      • Highly decorated Vietnam helicopter pilot, Lt. Colonel Richard Taus, an FBI Special Agent working in the New York City offices, under an FBI supervisor involved with a brutal Mafia capo, Gregory Scarpa, Sr., in decades of murders of American citizens, and in the prosecution of innocent people.

      • Captain Rodney Stich.

    • Engineering a scheme, and protecting the perpetrators that carry out the scheme, to halt Captain Rodney Stich's exposure of high-level deadly corruption.

    • Sacramento federal prosecutor David Levi charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for filing a federal action seeking to report deadly corruption. That filing was required and authorized under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.  Federal judges have a mandatory duty to receive information on federal crimes offered to them by anyone. That  charge by the DOJ prosecutor against Stich, and the federal judge's refusal to receive the information, constituted obstruction of justice, a criminal act. A series of deadly consequences followed what had already occurred—a series of terrorist successes against U.S. targets. (Federal prosecutor David Levi was later promoted to a federal judge at Sacramento.)

    • In violation of federal laws and constitutional protections, DOJ personnel seized and liquidated Captain Stich's life assets that had funded his costly efforts to halt the corruption-enabled series of tragic events, especially aviation and terrorist associated.

    • Reversing DOJ responsibilities to prevent civil rights violations, DOJ personnel inflicted a continuing  series of gross civil rights violations that inflicted great and irreparable personal and financial. harm upon Captain Stich, inflicting massive changes in his quality of life.

    • Reversing DOJ responsibilities to prevent federal crimes and protect national security, DOJ personnel perpetrated federal crimes, which in one area enabled the nation's worst series of terrorist attacks in the nation's history: the forewarned al Qaeda's plans to hijack U.S. airliners and fly them into buildings.

    Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, documented from the 1970s to 2005, and continuing, including:

    • Aided and abetted, all of the above, as they were repeatedly notified by legal submissions and letters.

    • Instead of carrying out their supervising responsibilities over federal judges, they covered up, and aided and abetted, the matters described here. They approved and provided protection to the serious misconduct by federal judges, enabled some of America's greatest corruption-enabled tragedies.

    • Among the human tragedies enabled by the corruption that very possibly could have been prevented were the following  examples:

    Other More Remote Enablers of Harm and Great Tragedies

    California judges that became a part of the sham lawsuit to halt the costly efforts by Captain Stich to expose and halt the corruption that already had a history of horrific aviation disasters and other harm to the American people.

    Six Years and Hundreds of Hours of Attorney Efforts
    In Sham and Legally Barred Lawsuit:
    Real Motive?

    The CIA-front law firm, Friedman, Sloan and Ross, whose conduct in the DOJ scheme required six years of gross violations of California and federal laws, landmark decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, constitutional protections, violated as part of a criminal conspiracy to silence a corruption-fighter and protect criminal conduct in powerful government positions. The coordinated conduct between California judges and the CIA-front law firm, in carrying out the DOJ scheme, met the criteria for a RICO criminal organization. They were later joined by other attorneys and law firms—as the corruption Stich and his group were trying to halt was enabling  a series of worsening al Qaeda attacks. (Captain Stich had no assets for the attorneys to seize: their motives—to silence him!)

    Motive Other Than Money for 23 Years of Attacks
    Upon Corruption-Fighter by Legal Industry

    The hoard of lawyers and law firms that played enabling roles, from 1982 to 2005, expended hundreds, if not over a thousand hours, in attacks on the corruption-fighter. That expenditure of time and money had to be brought about by a powerful force, and motivated by something other than money. The huge numbers of lawyers and law firms and expenditures of  years of attacks would not have been economically feasible; there was a far more important factor behind the thousands of hours of legal efforts against the corruption-fighter: 

    Captain Stich's lawyers that sabotaged his defenses.

    Members of Congress, who were repeatedly notified of all of these facts, and whose silence enabled the corruption and the consequences to continue. Many members of Congress admitted the gravity of the charges.

    Media personnel and media corporations, and others, who were notified of these matters and whose silence enabled the continuation of events that led to the harm and threats adversely affecting the United States and its people. Many were on the secret payroll of CIA and other non-elected government groups.

    Absolute Secrecy from the Public Was Necessary

    This sampling of facts had been made known for years by Captain Stich to members of Congress, to media personnel and corporations, and other sources, all of whom had a moral and legal responsibility to contact Stich and examine his evidence. None did, becoming enablers of the continuing  crimes against the United States and the resulting harm and catastrophic events. They now had a self-serving interest in continuing the cover-ups.

    Two Sets of World-Record Aviation Disasters
    In New York City

    The documented corruption had multiple world record tragedies for Americans. Two sets of world-record aviation disasters occurred in New York City. The first occurred on December 16, 1960. The corrupt enabling contacts in that disaster and several others of that same airline were the reason why FAA airline safety inspector was given the unprecedented and official life-and-death-assignment that enabled him to discover the high-level corruption in major government positions, that started the powerful attacks against him. Both of those two world record related airline disasters in New York City involved Captain Rodney Stich exposing their enabling corruption.

    In the second series of aviation disasters in New York City on September 11, 2001, Captain Stich reported the enabling corruption-criminal activities before the consequences occurred.

    A boy, Stevie Baltz, sole survivor, for two days.

    None of the enablers were affected; only the victims and the FAA inspector that sought to halt the enabling corruption. That, and several other horrific airline disasters resulted in FAA airline safety inspector being given the unprecedented official life-and-death-assignment that would change his life and follow him to his grave!

    The above tragedy was one of the many that generated the fateful decision by Captain Stich to "fight the unwinnable fight!"

    Corrupt and Deadly Misconduct Meets Criteria
    For Crimes of Obstruction of Justice
    And RICO Racketeering Enterprise

    The conduct of judges stated herein far exceeded the criteria for obstruction of justice, a criminal act, and a Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO).

    Definition of Obstruction of Justice

    Criminal statute, Title 18 USC § 1503 makes it a crime to threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against these participants in a criminal or civil proceeding. In addition, section 1503 makes it illegal to attempt the bribery of an official to alter the outcome of a judicial proceeding.

    Besides these specific prohibitions in section 1503, the Omnibus Clause states that a person who "corruptly or by threats of force, or by threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice" is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice. This clause offers broad protection to the "due administration of justice." Federal courts have read this clause expansively to proscribe any conduct that interferes with the judicial process.

    Definition of Racketeering Enterprise

    The documented conduct of the federal judges and the Supreme Court Justices (and Department of Justice personnel) repeatedly blocked the reporting of federal crimes, meeting the definition of obstruction of justice. The way that it was done also meets the definition of a Racketeering Enterprise.

    Federal criminal statute, Title 18 § 1503, in the Omnibus Clause, states that a person [or group] who:

    "corruptly or by threats of force, or by threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice" is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice.

    Federal courts have read this clause expansively to proscribe any conduct that interferes with the judicial process, and broadly applied this statute to the "due administration of justice."

    See also:

    Documents reveal facts meeting the criteria for a conspiracy: The principle conspirators were and are Department of Justice personnel and federal Judges, with the complicity of Supreme Court Justices, and others helping as shills.

    • The series of unprecedented, unnatural, illegal, and criminal events provide years of evidence of a conspiracy. It included:

    • Years of cover-ups of corrupt and criminal acts and protection of the perpetrators who were part of the ruling Years of corrupt and criminal misuse of Department of Years of corrupt and criminal misconduct of the federal courts by federal judges.

    • Years of complicity by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

    • Years of corrupt manipulation of California judges, Years of harm to individual Americans, serving as America's feeding trough.

    Credibility of This Information

    The unprecedented personal letter and apology by highly respected  Supreme Court Justice Byron White, in response to a 60-page Emergency Petition that addressed these serious matters. His short but revealing statement stated that—as a single justice—was a powerful statement, and leaves one wondering what power was preventing him from acting.

    The dozens of documents to and from the federal courts are self-revealing. They speak for themselves.

    The close relationship between the reported corrupt conduct and the harm resulting from it, covering the period from 1960 to 2014.

    The documented and unprecedented actions taken by Department of Justice personnel, dozens of federal judges, and Supreme Court Justices, that were major civil, constitutional, and criminal offenses, and even meeting the criteria of a Racketeering Enterprise (RICO).

    The decades of credibility by the corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, and his several dozen key sources from covert and law enforcement operations, all of whom were there. His corruption-fighting efforts went far beyond that of a whistleblower, and started after he was given an unprecedented, official, life-and-death-assignment, as a federal airline safety inspector for the Federal Aviation Agency.


    That assignment was to halt the aviation safety problems, including corrupt  and criminal activities, that enabled decades of horrific aviation disasters to occur. The misconduct was at a politically-powerful  airline and the politics, incompetence, and corruption at the government's aviation safety agency known to knowledgeable insiders at that time as the "tombstone agency." Other credibility information.

    No Modern Nation and Its People Have Experienced
    The Corruption in Government And
    The Consequences Revealed Here

    No modern nation, and its people, have ever been subverted in this manner, for so long, as shown by this sampling of events. The people of no modern nation have ever experienced the harm directly inflicted upon them by their leaders, and the catastrophic type of harm enabled by decades of corrupt conduct by their leaders; and being used as a feeding trough for the elite in the government oligarchy. And the people of no other nation have chosen to be so indifferent to even a fraction of what the American public is willing to endure.

    Five Years Fighting a Foreign Enemy—Only To
    Return Home to a More Sinister Enemy
    And Suffer Far Worse Har

    Captain Rodney Stich spent five years in the U.S. Navy during World War II, a Naval Aviator and Patrol Plane Commander. The Japanese enemy made known their intent. But in the United States, Stich's enemies—and those of the American public—cowardly and criminally hid behind their position of trust, subverting the laws and constitution of the United States, spreading their corruption throughout the nation, with continual catastrophic consequences. 


    After 40 Years, Giving Up the Fight—
    But Leaving a Record

    After 40 years of fighting a lonely and traumatic crusade, Captain Stich finally gave up the fight through the judicial and other government system. With the dumbing down of the American people, their obsession with trivia, fixation on tiny screens and 140-character mental limitation, it appears hopeless. All further articles are for the purpose of showing how the American people made possible most of the tragedies that occurred.

    When you recite the pledge of allegiance and get to the words, "With liberty and justice for all," think of the above sampling of how our federal judges and Supreme Court Justices, openly trample on these cherished values; how they destroy lives; and enabled great harm to the nation and its people.

    Protecting Themselves and the Oligarchy: Placing
    Corrupt People in Key Positions

    Something like the revolving door syndrome, but better. It pays to be part of the team—and place them into gateway positions to block any threat:

    • Sacramento federal prosecutor David Levi, was promoted to U.S. District Judge at Sacramento, after he criminally charged Captain Stich with criminal contempt of court for reporting corruption associated with 20 years of American tragedies.

    • Las Vegas bankruptcy Judge Robert Jones was promoted to U.S. Attorney at Reno after he criminally misused his position to seize Captain Stich's life assets.
    • Chief Judge Michael Mukasey, who blocked the post-9/11 filing that would otherwise have led to possible impeachment and criminal prosecution  of wholesale numbers of federal judges and others, was later promoted to U.S. Attorney General of the United States by President George Bush (Jr.).
    • U.S. Attorney Eric Holder, who blocked one of Captain Stich's federal filings in the District of Columbia, was promoted to U.S. Attorney General by President Barack Obama.
    • Similar promotions were given to the FAA personnel that attacked FAA airline safety inspector Rodney Stich during his life-and-death-assignment, blocking his official assignment, enabling three additional aviation disasters to occur during the attacks, and enabled years of additional corruption-enabled aviation disasters to occur.
    • The many letters from members of Congress and professionals acknowledging the seriousness of Captain Stich's charges.

    Tactics Used by Judges to Block Reporting
    Of System-Wide Corruption: Approved
    By Supreme Court Justices

    An examination of the court papers by a competent person with a basic knowledge of law practice would recognize the tactics used by the California and federal judges in this deadly series of events that first started in the 1970s and then went into an attack mode with the sham lawsuit filed in the California courts that needed the cooperation of every level of the California judicial system, every level of the federal judicial system, and that of personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice (and others).


    Repeated tactics by California judges as they acted without personal and subject matter jurisdiction  (under California statutes) and repeatedly violated dozens of state and federal statutes and controlling decisional laws and landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions:

    • Label every exercise of state and constitutional defenses as frivolous acts.

    • Vexatious litigant.
    • Label the victim of their civil rights outrages a frivolous litigant.
    • Order him to pay thousands of dollars for exercising legal defenses.

    Repeated tactics by federal judges:

    • Federal judges repeatedly labeled court filings by Captain Rodney Stich, reporting criminal activities that he initially discovered after being given the unprecedented and official life-and-death-assignment, and also learned  from his group of insiders, that were enabling a continuing series of horrific events, that he sought to report and halt through reports under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4—as frivolous acts. Thousands of  deaths were enabled by those judges. And these were frivolous acts!!
    • Issued unlawful  and unconstitutional orders permanently blocking the corruption-fighter and victim, and access to federal courts, and access to federal defenses (that are not denied to foreign terrorists or brutal criminals). 
    • Federal judges and Department of Justice trustees, seizing the corruption-fighter's assets that funded his corruption-fighting  activities, violating major  protections in law and without constitutional  due process in a criminal. manner as shown by court transcripts.
    • Examples of what Federal judges called frivolous court filings, as they blocked the reporting of criminal activities of key people in government, and enabling massive civil and constitutional (and criminal ) violations to halt the actions of a corruption fighter.
    • Federal judges and Department of Justice personnel protecting people whose deadly criminal misconduct were subverting the national security of the United States.
    • In an illegal dismissal on September 23, 1991, of a federal action filed in the federal courts in the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 91-1432, ) U.S. District Judge Samuel Sporkin (the same judge with secret CIA bank accounts funded by the CIA in a covert CIA operation based in Honolulu) had  the following comments of the corruption-fighter:
    • Labeled the corruption-fighter as a "serial litigator." Instead he should have ignored the corruption, let it continue, and let them die!

    • "Rambling pages of often unintelligible claims."

    • "Makes claims under a laundry list of federal statutes and constitutional provisions."

    • "Appalling lack of respect for the judicial branch." Fully justified!

    • "Vexatious litigant."

    • "Mr. Stich's actions are frivolous and constitute outrageous harassment of the named defendants."

    • Lacks the ability to discern those matters which genuinely demand judicial attention  from those so frivolous  as to be a hindrance to the court.

    As the above statements were written by Sporkin and other federal judges, U.S.  Supreme Court Justice Byron White was writing an unprecedented apology to Captain Stich, implying the gravity of what he was stating, and then making the unprecedented in Supreme Court history comment: "as a single Justice, I cannot help."


    Sampling of the  Victims of the Judges Tactics

    Also occurring at that time were the start of corruption-enabled terrorist successes, horrific experiences for the victims.


    One of about 200 reported victims, choosing this form of dying, from the corruption-enabled events made possible by the corruption that Captain Stich sought to halt, that Judge Sporkin (and others) called frivolous conduct of a vexatious litigant.


    Sampling of Filings and Letters Submitted to
    U.S. Supreme Court Justices from the 1970s to 2005


    List of filings:

    Implications of complicity by Justices of U.S. Supreme Court.

    Filings submitter to Supreme Court Justices.

    Supreme Court and corporations.

    Malfeasance of Supreme Court Justices.

    Complaint federal courts, New York City, August 15, 1990.

    Complicity between Department of Justice personnel, federal judges, and Supreme Court Justices.

    You Can Help



    You can help correct to make people aware of these serious problems and possible bring about a groundswell of outrage by surging people to either read this material—if they have the mental ability to understand the contents—or convey to them what is going on. The people in the system, and those who are complicit through cover-ups, will act to keep this secret.

    Documentaries in Not-for-Profits Books Based on Personal Discoveries of Several Dozen Insiders:
    CIA, FBI, DEA, And Others

    Over a dozen highly detailed and documented books, detailing the discoveries of several dozen people exposed to the criminal activities. These are heavily details books written by corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, backed by decades of credibility. They provide the material for a peaceful "Arab Spring" outrage among courageous Americans. (These books are available in print and digital format at;; and other web sites. At each site, put "Rodney Stich" into the search box for a list of these books.







    All of the books are available at, in print and on digital formats, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich.

    Sampling of early books reviews.

    Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.

    Commendation of the granddaddy of corruption reporting whistleblowers.

    His background and credibility.

    Bio on granddaddy of corruption exposing and corruption fighting whistleblowers.

    Similarities Between Germans under Adolf Hitler
    And Today's Americans

    A poem written by Martin Niemoller, relating to how Germans tolerate Adolf Hitler is especially suitable to most Americans today:

        First they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Jew.
        Then they came for the Communists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Communist.
        Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a trade unionist.
        Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me.


                      Pastor Martin Niemöller

    Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) first supported the rise of Adolf Hitler, and then upon learning the truth, and objecting, he was imprisoned. He wrote a poem about the state of denial of Germans about what Hitler was doing. Probably no better example could be shown than what has been done to the American people, in their name, while they ignored the outrages.


    Return to