Introduction to the Dark Side Of U.S. Supreme Court Justices' Conduct This documentary provides specific information revealing major misconduct by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Detailed here are specific and documented actions in which the Supreme Court Justices were complicit. Their complicity started in the 1970s, when they were informed via a federal lawsuit of serious federal crimes that were enabling a series of aviation disasters and the obstruction of justice by federal judges, over whom the Justices had supervisory responsibilities. Here is basically what the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court did from the 1970s to 2005, and later, as recorded in judicial records. Those actions and inactions aided and abetted the continuation of serious corruption in key government positions, that in turn, inflicted upon individual Americans great harm, and enabled many of America's aviation disasters and terrorist successes. Among the credibility indications shown here was the unprecedented personal letter and apology by highly respected Supreme Court Justice Byron White. The information was made into reports made to various government personnel, including to federal judges under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. That statute makes mandatory, anyone knowing of a federal crime must report it to a federal judge or other federal official, and that federal judge (or other officer) has a mandatory duty to receive the information. Blocking such reports would be the crime of obstruction of justice. That would include federal judges and Supreme Court Justices. The gravity of the ongoing criminal activities being reported was revealed by prior harm to the American people and a series of catastrophic aviation disasters and terrorist successes. The attempts to provide evidence of the deadly corruption was by corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, who had decades of credibility, including support by highly respected U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron White. Sampling of complicity by the Supreme Court Justices: Repeatedly Blocking Reports of Corruption in Government Approved the repeated cover-up and obstruction of justice by federal judges that were blocking reports of criminal activities, starting in the 1970s. The initial reports associated specific corrupt/criminal conduct with a series of specific aviation disasters, including those that the corruption-fighter had oversight responsibilities. The discoveries expanded into CIA activities that were criminal in nature. Further discoveries were made, including, for instance, criminal activities by personnel in the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), U.S. Department of Justice, including their complicity with major crime figures in the brutal murders of American citizens. Misconduct by people in government positions also included the criminal misuse of the offices of the U.S. Department of Justice and the federal courts to silence the corruption fighter. Unique Sources Discovering Corruption Among the people who discovered the decades that were discovered during the official duties by a coalition of insiders. They included former heads of secret CIA airlines, secret CIA financial operations, FBI and DEA personnel, Mafia insiders, FAA airline safety inspectors, and others. The information was being provided by former FAA airline safety inspector and corruption-fighter, Captain Rodney Stich. Included in the corruption being reported were the harm inflicted upon individual Americans and the enabled aviation disasters and terrorist successes. The following are a sampling of the information provided to Supreme Court Justices from the 1970 to 2005 and later: Blocked Every Attempt to Report Tragedy-Enabling Corruption Federal judges blocked every single attempt to report the serious criminal activities that were resulting in great harm, aviation disasters, and terrorist successes. Blocked Every Attempt to Halt Massive Civil Rights Violations Inflicted as Part of a Scheme to Silence Whistleblowers Federal judges blocked every attempt to obtain a federal court forum and relief from great personal and financial harm inflicted by California judges. The harm occurred in a sham lawsuit and scheme that evidence indicates was controlled by a powerful force in the federal government, the U.S. Department of Justice. That scheme, continuing for six years, included repeated violations of dozens and state and laws. Aided and Abetted the Termination of All Rights and Protections While Corruption-Fighter Was Being Criminally Attacked By Federal Judges Under SC Supervisory Responsibilities Federal judges repeatedly issued unlawful and unconstitutional orders terminating the corruption-fighter's access to any federal district and appellate court. In that way, he was unable to obtain the relief in the federal courts from the massive violations of federally protected rights under the Civil Rights Act and other statutes, such as the declaratory judgment. (The issues raised in the sham lawsuit had been adjudicated and finalized 18 years earlier and entered as final judgments in the states of Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Nevada—and California.) In addition, the orders constituted obstruction of justice as they knowingly barred the corruption-fighter from reporting the serious criminal activities that were continuing to result in great harm, which would shortly include a series of terrorist successes made possible by the reported corruption (particularly in the U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Aviation Administration). Approving Criminal Contempt of Court For Attempting To Halt the Deadly Corruption and Federal Defenses Federal judges and Department of Justice personnel, both involved in the criminal activities, charged the corruption fighter with criminal contempt of court for filing papers in the federal courts at Sacramento seeking relief from the devastating personal and financial harm inflicted by California judges and for reporting additional criminal activities that he and his group discovered. Denied Constitutional Right to Jury Trial in Kangaroo Court Federal judges denied the corruption-fighter the constitutional right to a jury trial and he was charged, prosecuted, judged, and sent to prison by the same two groups heavily involved in the criminal activities. He was sentenced at the age of 67 to six months in federal prison, carried out in m the most brutal method possible, including weeks in solitary confinement. Seizing and Liquidating Life Assets Without a Hearing or Cause, In a Criminal Manner Federal judges seized and liquidated the corruption-fighter's life assets, without the constitutional right to a hearing and without legal cause—and in a criminal manner that required the cooperation of two of the lawyers hired by the corruption-fighter. Criminal Contempt of Court for Exercising Legal and Constitutional Right to Object to the Seizure of Life Assets Federal judges charged the corruption-fighter with criminal contempt of court for filing a legal objection to the seizure and liquidation of the assets. Obstruction of Justice During Corruption-Enabled Terrorist Successes When the corruption had already resulted in two successful terrorist attacks, and the corruption fighter filed an title 18 USC §4 actions in the federal courts at Sacramento, during which the latest al Qaeda success occurred on September 11, 2001, the judges again blocked the corruption-fighter from reporting the enabling corruption. Continued Protection of Corruption Perpetrators After 3,000 Corruption-Enabled Deaths Following the 9/11 terrorist attacks, federal judges in the District of Columbia and at New York City blocked the reporting of the corruption that enabled those attacks to success, federal judges continued their obstruction of justice. Act. Obstruction-of-Justice-Enabled Continuation Into Calamitous Invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq The continued obstruction of justice and other crimes following post-9/11 enabled the enablers described here to be protected by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court—including themselves, and for the massive harm to be suffered by the people of the United States, they enabled the frauds to continue to the invasions of two nations that had no enabling role in the series of al Qaeda attacks, including those on September 11, 2001. Ironically, the judicial cover-ups and prison sentence for attempt to report and halt the corruption had an ironic twist in New York City. The 9/11 world-record aviation disasters occurring in New York City was enabled by the corruption that the corruption-fighter repeated reported—and for which he was sent to prison. 40 years earlier, it was a world record aviation disaster occurring in New York City that caused aviation-safety minded group in the FAA to give federal airline safety inspector Rodney Stich the unprecedented and official life and death assignment to halt the corruption that enabled that disaster and several others to occur. A grave breakdown now exists in the U.S. Department of Justice, the federal courts, and the U.S. Supreme Court that is unacceptable for national security. Start of Documenting the Corruption While On Life-and-Death Assignment During the early periods of aviation, when aviation disasters were a common event, highly experienced federal airline safety inspector Rodney Stich was given the unprecedented official life-and-death assignment by mid-level FAA management in the Los Angeles offices to halt the corruption in the aviation safety activities at United Airlines—and the corruption within the local FAA offices. Their conduct enabled a continuing series of airline disasters to occur. One of those disasters occurred in New York City on December 16, 1960s; it was the world's worst airline disaster at that time. First Fight with Life-and-Death Consequences It was from there that the corruption fighter was driven to engaged in an unprecedented series of actions that eventually exposed grave misconduct that was resulting in great harm, deaths, and worse catastrophic events, and reveal conditions in government never before revealed in the government of any modern nation. That bizarre and world aviation scandal, and how it exploded far beyond the aviation arena, is described at www.defraudingamerica.com/faa_start_of_corruption_fighter. Federal Court Filing Reporting Federal Crimes Relating to Series of Aviation Disasters The corruption and aviation disasters continued at United Airlines, and at other airlines due to FAA failure to address other safety problems. These tragedies were the consequences of corruption, politics, revolving door syndrome, and incompetence, in the "tombstone agency. In 1975, Stich filed a lawsuit against the Federal Aviation Administration, seeking to report federal crimes, under the authority of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. That statute makes mandatory the requirement of anyone who knows of a federal crime to report it to a federal judge or other federal official, and imposes a mandatory duty on a federal judge or other federal official to receive the information. DOJ Personnel Covering Up for Ongoing Deadly Corruption: Excuse: Lack of Standing to Report Crimes of Federal Personnel! Rather than perform a mandatory duty to assist in reporting the deadly offenses, employees of the U.S. Department of Justice filed papers claiming that Stich had no standing to report the federal crimes. Anyone has standing to report a federal crime, and failure to make such report, as required by the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, is a criminal offence (for which many people have been prosecuted and sent to prison). Federal prosecutors, for instance, routinely charge individual Americans with obstruction of justice for failing to report a federal crime. In the book, America's corrupt War on Drugs, the case is cited of a black mother who was sentenced to five years in prison for failure to report what she overheard on a conversation relating to drugs. Federal Judge's Complicity in Continuing The Deadly Status Quo U.S. District Judge Robert Schnacke went along with the Department of Justice's obstruction of justice tactic,, and dismissed the action, in clear violation of due process and the federal crime reporting statute. (Department of Justice had previously covered up for serious problems in the FAA related to several prior aviation disasters, and this culture continued into the next century, as documented by Stich. Stich filed a notice of appeal and submitted written briefs. During oral arguments before the U.S. Court of Appeals at San Francisco, the three appellate judges acknowledged the seriousness of the charges and then stated it was a matter for Congress. Stich responded that he had brought these matters to members of Congress and failed to have corrective action taken. (Congress did respond. Two years after Stich provided members of Congress with evidence, in 1967, Congress terminated the Federal Aviation Agency and replaced it with the Federal Aviation Administration. But the same personnel and the same culture existed, under a different name. First Recorded Complicity of The U.S. Supreme Court Justices Stich then filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on April 30, 1977. That petition put the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on notice: Of the ongoing federal crimes in the government's aviation safety offices that enabled the continuing series of horrific aviation disasters to occur. It could be expected that the corruption and the fraud-enabled aviation disasters would continue if the issues were not addressed and acted upon. That federal district and appellate judges were preventing these serious matters to be presented, constituting obstruction of justice, and that the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court had, by law, supervising responsibilities over those judges that were committing serious violations of their mandatory duties. Under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, federal judges and any other federal personnel—including Supreme Court Justices—also were required to receive the information and insure that the information was honestly acted upon. The Supreme Court Justices issued a decision refusing to hear the action, thereby approving the misconduct that would enable the corruption to worsen, and the resulting consequences to also continue. Once that happened, the Supreme Court Justices had to continue the cover-ups to protect themselves from the catastrophic consequences of their prior acts. World's Worst Aviation Disaster, 1978 In 1978, a PSA airline flight crashed into the city of San Diego. It became the world's worst airline disaster at that time—replacing the record held by the United Airlines crash into New York City on December 16, 1960. Captain Rodney Stich, in the process of writing a not-for-profit book titled, Unfriendly Skies, discovered misconduct on the part of the cockpit crew that contributed to the disaster. That information was obtained from a woman who was a passenger on that aircraft from its early morning departure at Sacramento, but who left the aircraft at Los Angles before it departed for San Diego. (Details in the book, History of Aviation Disasters: 1950 to 9/11.) After obtaining the information from the woman, Stich filed a petition with the NTSB to present material evidence that played the major enabling role leading to the disaster. The political NTSB board refused to receive the material evidence, violating their duty to receive it. The NTSB political board members had a major self-interest in preventing Stich's role and information to become known. In the past, which Stich was a FAA airline safety inspector, he reported to the NTSB (and its predecessor, the Civil Aeronautics Board), the serious problems in the FAA, and they covered up. That enabled the deadly crashes to continue, and the need to withhold the enabling causes from the official accident report—which also included their enabling role from the prior cover-ups. A textbook example of this relationship was the NTSB' enabling role and cover-up of a United Airlines fraud-related crash at Salt Lake City. With every cover-up, the scandal involved more people in key government positions—and a greater need to silence the corruption fighter. After the NTSB blocked Stich from presenting the major evidence that enabled PSA to crash, Stich then filed a federal lawsuit, Dec. 17, 1980, against the NTSB, seeking a court order requiring the NTSB to receive evidence that explained the primary cause of the great PSA crash. (As a FAA airline safety inspector, Stich had repeatedly seen NTSB board members covering up for FAA misconduct that enabled the crashes to continue. Among these were the December 16, 1960 United Airlines crash into New York City, the world's worst at that time; and other United Airlines crashes at Denver, Salt Lake City, Portland, Oregon, among others.) Within a couple of days after Stich filed the lawsuit at San Francisco, Assistant U.S. Attorney George Stoll in the San Francisco office contacted him by phone. Stoll agreed with Stich that the NTSB should be required to reopen the investigation. During this conversation, Stoll stated: It’s ridiculous that the NTSB did not investigate further into the reported partying. ... The investigation should be reopened. ... I am going to bring pressure on them [NTSB] through the Department of Justice to see if they won’t reopen the investigation. ... The government has responsibility to see to it that its agencies do their jobs. ... I can go ahead and file a motion to dismiss in the next few days, but I’m not satisfied with that because I don’t think in this case the government’s skirts are totally clean, and I don’t think it’s my job to cover up. ... I agree with you that what she said, passenger Helen Rhea, was far more than an investigator in many cases is reasonably likely to hear. It certainly is pregnant with some very serious implications. ... It is ridiculous. Stoll stated to Stich that he was recommending to his superiors in Washington that the government supports his federal filing, and that the NTSB be ordered to reopen the investigation and admit evidence of the PSA cockpit crew's all-night partying before the 7 a.m. takeoff from Sacramento. Stoll also stated that he was recommending that the NTSB be investigated, as was obviously necessary. Assistant U.S. Attorney Stoll was unaware of the long history of cover-up by his Washington bosses in the U.S. Department of Justice that Stich had previously experienced and documented. Stich knew that Stoll’s recommendations would be denied. If Stoll was not blocked, the series of scandals involving earlier aviation disasters could receive worldwide publicity. The Sudden Lie and Reversal of Concern: As Expected A week later, contradicting what he had previously stated to Stich, Assistant U.S. Attorney George Stoll filed a motion to dismiss the request for an order, stating in the motion to dismiss: “There is no question in this case that the Board has performed its duty and conducted a substantial investigation.” That Department of Justice tactic would be repeated numerous times thereafter, as the system protected itself. The complaint against the NTSB had been assigned to U.S. District Judge Stanley Weigel in the Northern District of California at San Francisco. During the various motions by the U.S. Attorney to dismiss the lawsuit, Weigel admitted the gravity and probable consequences of the allegations in Stich's complaint. Under federal case law, the allegations in the complaint must be accepted as true in opposing motions to dismiss. Also, he had a responsibility under Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 to receive Stich's testimony and evidence when Stich reported the federal crimes to a federal court as required by that statute. The lawsuit could be dismissed only if the allegations did not state facts constituting a federal cause of action. Judge Weigel dismissed the action, falsely stating that Stich was appealing an order of the NTSB, and that it came under federal statute, Title 49 U.S.C. § 1903(d). Stich did not file his cause of action under that statute. He did not appeal an order. He filed it under Title 28 United States Code Section 1361, giving federal courts the authority to force an administrative agency to comply with the law, and receive Stich's evidence. Judge Weigel stated in part: “This is a matter that is properly before the Court of Appeals, and in a way I am sorry, because it is a fascinating subject and I would like very much to have it before me. But under the law, I don’t think I properly can.” He also stated that it should have been filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals. That was incorrect. But, if the complaint was filed in the wrong federal court, under law he was required, in the interest of justice, to transfer the case to the Court of Appeals, rather than dismiss the action. Repeated Acknowledgment of Concern— And Sudden Cowardly Cover-Up Stich then filed an appeal, which was heard by U.S. Appeal Judges James Browning, Joseph Sneed, and Mary Schroeder. They also admitted the gravity of Stich's allegations. In their May 27, 1982, decision, the judges dismissed the appeal, stating: Although appellant’s concern for the safety of future airline passengers is commendable, in view of the recent decision of the United States Supreme Court in Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc., 102 S.Ct. 752 (1982), the judgment [of dismissal] must be affirmed. Article III of the United States Constitution limits federal court jurisdiction to “cases or controversies.” Consistent with this limitation, litigants may not make claims for relief in federal court without showing an actual or threatened personal injury. “At an irreducible minimum, Art. III requires the party who invokes the court’s authority to ‘show that he personally has suffered some actual or threatened injury as a result of the putatively illegal conduct of the defendant ....’” Valley Forge, supra, 102 S.Ct. at 758, quoting Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of Bellwood, 441 U.S. 91, 99, 99 S.Ct. 1601, 1608 (1979). Even absent an article III bar, this court should refrain from adjudicating disputes based on generalized grievances shared by all citizens. Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499-500, 95 S.Ct. 2197, 2205-06 (1975). Stich’s concern, the risk of future airline crashes, is real enough. That concern does not, however, rise to the level of an actual or threatened injury. The risk is shared by Americans generally. Absent an injury which threatens Stich in a way which distinguishes him from the populace as a whole, federal court action is barred. [Dismissal is] Affirmed. Another federal statute that requires federal courts to exercise jurisdiction when the Federal Aviation Act is violated is Title 49 United States Code Section 1487. That statute states: Any party in interest may apply to the district court of the United States ... for the enforcement of ... this Act, or such rule, regulation, requirement, ... such court shall have jurisdiction to enforce obedience thereto by a writ of injunction or other process, mandatory or otherwise, restraining such person, his officers, ... from further violations of such provision of this Act or of such rule, regulation, requirement ... and requiring their obedience thereto. Legal Filings Relating To Legal Action Against NTSB Judge's order, March 25, 1981, dismissing the NTSB lawsuit. Statement of material issues, April 11, 1981, filed by Stich. Points and authorities, April 11, 1981, filed with the statement of material issues. Opposition to motion to dismiss, April 19, 1981, filed by Stich in response to the U.S. Attorney's attempt to continue the cover-up. That obstruction of justice, seeking to protect wrongdoings in any government department, became the most common reaction to every attempt by Stich to halt not only the corruption but also the often tragic consequences of the corruption. Stich's appeal brief filed in U. S. Court of Appeals at San Francisco. Transcript of Stich's oral argument before U.S. Court of Appeals, April 23, 1981. Motion to alter or amend, by Stich, the order of dismissal, May 3, 1981. Order dated May 27, 1982, by U.S. Court of Appeals, dismissing the lawsuit. Stich's petition to U.S. Supreme Court, July 17, 1982. Order by U.S. Supreme Court, October 4, 1982, refusing to hear the case. By their action, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court continued to aid and abet the corruption by key people in key government operations, the obstruction of justice by federal district and appellate judges over whom the Supreme Court Justices had supervising responsibilities. Circumventing the Blocks in Government Offices: Prompting Attacks on Corruption-Fighter Thinking that the American public would show outrage and act, he published the documentary on aviation disasters just as the PSA tragedy occurred. It was called Unfriendly Skies and received excellent book reviews. Stich appeared on hundreds of radio and TV appearances, and gave talks before large audiences, and received many complimentary comments from the public. These actions threatened powerful people government, especially within the U.S. Department of Justice, federal judges—and Supreme Court Justices. His expanded second edition in 1981 described the enabling role in the corruption and resulting tragedies by personnel in control of the U.S. Department of Justice, federal judges, and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court—the most powerful people in government. The main power in government was at risk of suffering major consequences if Captain Stich succeeded in showing how they have suffered and the people responsible. These actions prompted a scheme against the corruption-fighter that expanded out of control, exposing other areas of corruption, and showing the ability of a powerful force in government that can turn any state or federal government entity, and media and other shills, against the American people. Start of a Scheme to Silence the Corruption Fighter In 1982, a bizarre scheme was initiated by a CIA-FBI-front law firm in San Francisco, Friedman, Sloan and Ross. That sham lawsuit filed in the California courts at Fairfield, California was barred by lack of personal and subject matter jurisdiction, barred by dozens of California statutes and controlling decisional decisions, and federal laws and controlling decisional decisions, and barred by landmark U.S. Supreme Court decisions. The scheme targeted and eventually seized Stich's assets that funded his expensive corruption fighting efforts. It also halted his efforts to expose and halt the corrupt activities that were continuing to play enabling roles in many if the continuing aviation disasters (and as he would later learn, corruption in other areas of covert government operations). Judges at Every Level of California Courts Aided and Abetted the Scheme Every level of the California judicial system protected the scheme. Every one of the dozens of state and federal statutes that barred the action was repeatedly violated, and approved by judges in the California appellate courts and the California Supreme Court. The one exception was Justice Stanley Mosk in the California Supreme Court. He voted to hear Stich's appeal in 1983. It required a majority of the California Supreme Court Justices to accept a case for hearing. The other Justices approved on the massive violations that were criminalizing the California judicial system. California Judges Compounded their Repeated Law Violations With Sham Frivolous Labels to Deny Due Process Appeal Remedies Confronting Captain Stich from the very beginning of the life-and-death FAA assignment, one incomprehensible and illegal obstacle after the other occurred. It started again as California judges, rendering orders inflicting great personal and financial harm upon Stich, lacking personal and subject matter jurisdiction, and repeatedly violating dozens of clear state and federal statutes, labeled every exercise of due process appeal remedies a frivolous act. That allowed the California judges to ignore the violations they were approving to carry out the scheme, and deprive Stich of his civil and constitutional due process remedies. Stich filed appeals with the California court of Appeals and was denied relief from the massive violations of state and federal laws that they were in a position of trust, and paid, to correct. The same occurred when Stich filed an appeal with the California Supreme Court. The only judge on that court that would hear the case was highly respected Stanley Mosk. The court decision showed this, but because a majority did not join in that decision, the unprecedented usurpation of the law continued. (Stich had heard from sources that there were serious problems in the California courts relating to this matter.) Stich then filed an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, in December 1985, in case number A-313. The Supreme Court Justices upheld the violations by denying a hearing. Example of tactics used by California judges to carry out the scheme and continue the deadly corruption at the federal level. www.defraudingamerica.com/california_due_process_denial. Repeated Sabotage of His Paid Lawyers Stich discovered he was being sabotaged by the lawyers that he paid thousands of dollars to defend against the sham lawsuit. After several years of this repeated occurrence, it became obvious that a powerful force was behind these actions. Stich had already spent hundreds of hours studying legal procedures in law libraries in his earlier court filings against the FAA and NTSB, making it easy to discover the massive amounts of law barring the sham lawsuit. Exercising Federal Defenses To Halt Record-Setting Number of Violations Of State and Federal Laws Inflicting Great Harm on Corruption-Fighter The violation by California judges of any one of the dozens of California and federal laws that were repeatedly violated constituted a federal cause of action for which there were federal remedies. Federal judges were required to provide federal court access and federal defenses. At that time, the primary remedies against the sham action were the declaratory judgment act, to declare the validity of prior judgments that were final determination of the issues. The second primary cause of action was the civil rights act to address the repeated violations of the multiple California and federal statutes and constitutional due process. Any subsequent order constituted new violations and constituted another federal cause of action. Complicity of Federal Judges Supporting the Scheme Stich then filed an action in the federal courts at Sacramento under several federal causes of actions for which federal judges had a mandatory duty to provide a federal court forum and relief if violations were shown. The primary federal issues sought: A declaratory judgment that required the California judges to recognize the validity of the prior judgment that was a final determination of the issues 16 years earlier, and which were entered as a final judgment in the states of Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Nevada—and California, years earlier. An order preventing the California judges from record-setting civil rights violations, as [provided by the Civil Rights act, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983-1986. Any one of the dozens of California and federal statutes, controlling decisional laws, landmark Supreme Court decisions, and major constitutional protections, invoked the mandatory duty of federal judges to provide a federal court forum; and for every subsequent act by the California judge invoked a new federal cause of action. The California judges acted as if they had carte balance immunity from some powerful source in the federal government that their gross violations and infliction of great and irreparable personal and financial harm would be protected at the highest levels of the state and federal government—including the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Prior Corruption Cover-Up Extended To Direct Role in Silencing Corruption Fighter In every prior action filed in the Ninth Circuit federal courts in California, attempts to report the corrupt and deadly corruption in the FAA, and the NTSB cover-ups of those problems, were unlawfully blocked by federal district and appellate judges. Now, the tactics by federal judges were denying federal defenses for the whistleblower that were part of the scheme to silence him. Sacramento federal district judge Raul Ramirez promptly dismissed the action at the first and only hearing, without allowing the case to be heard. That action aided and abetted the gross violations perpetrated by the California judges in that sham lawsuit. Something serious was amiss, but it would be several years before there was sufficient evidence to reveal the probable source of the attacks upon the corruption fighter. Permanent Termination of Due Process While Inflicting Great Personal and Financial Harm As Stich continued to lose properties—including his home on a mountain side near Green Valley, due to the continuing unlawful orders by California judges, he again filed a federal lawsuit in the federal courts at Sacramento, seeking to halt the losses and the great stress that he was under. Every new order rendered by the California judges, which continued to inflict grave personal and property harm, constituted new federal causes of actions in federal courts. Failure to exercise that right is a forfeiture of them. He filed another action, as provided by law, seeking to halt the additional actions by California judges that were causing him to lose valuable properties, including his residence on a mountain top near Green Valley. That action was assigned to federal judge Milton Schwartz, who continued the suspension of Stich federal remedies. Schwartz then compounded that action by an illegal and unconstitutional order permanently barring him from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. This was bizarre. Illegal, unconstitutional, and criminal actions could now be taken against Stich, and he was barred from defending himself. The daily stresses that would continue in the California courts from losing his life assets, recognizing the criminal nature of the actions by California and federal judges, and recognizing the hopelessness of his position, more than once brought him to tears. What was occurring was a criminal takeover of powerful government entities, criminally misused against someone who was trying to halt a pattern of horrific events, losing everything and about to become homeless. This was unprecedented in any modern industrial nation! Subsequent appeals were denied. Carte Blanche Termination of Liberty and Justice for All That order gave the California judges and the CIA-front law firm carte blanche immunity to continue inflicting great personal and financial harm upon Stich, with total immunity from any consequences. That order was obviously illegal and unconstitutional, and rendered with the approval of every subsequent federal judge and Supreme Court Justices. Stich then filed an appeal with the federal appellate courts at San Francisco. As they did with the lawsuit against FAA and the lawsuit against NTSB. Stich then filed a petition for writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court. That petition included not only the gross violations of civil and constitutional rights by the California judges, but also the gross violations by lower federal court judges to perform their mandatory duties and provide a federal court forum and order relief. The Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have supervising responsibilities over the conduct of federal district and appellate judges. The Supreme Court Justices also violated the statute, Title 42 USC § 1986, that requires anyone, who becomes aware of violations of a person's civil rights, to provide relief, if they are capable of doing so. Prison For Acting to Halt Tragedies Enabled By Corruption and Attacks Upon Corruption-Fighter Corruption Discoveries Greatly Expanded Captain Stich's discovery of corruption had started with the life-and-death-assignment in the FAA, and then expanded to include the political NTSB board members, the cover-ups by Department of Justice personnel, and then to federal judges. It then expanded. Starting in 1978, he had published the first edition of the not-for-profit book, Unfriendly Skies, and appeared as guest and expert on hundreds of radio and TV shows, attempting to inform and get public support. Unprecedented Discovery of Trove of Covert And Corrupt Activities These efforts generated considerable personal sympathy, but no action. But his corruption-fighting efforts made him known to former government personnel in the CIA, FBI, DEA, former drug smugglers—working for CIA and DEA personnel, former Mafia insiders, and others. These were key people who had been directly involved in numerous operations that were being lightly addressed in the media. They included: The head of a former covert CIA airline, who revealed various CIA operations, including drug smuggling involving his and other airlines, CIA delivery of arms to the Irish Republican Army (IRA), and other covert activities. The head of a former CIA operation based in Honolulu that had worldwide attention in the 1980s when its cover was blown by a Honolulu television reporter; and had dealt in drugs, money laundering for Fidel and Imelda Marcus of the Philippines; funded secret bank accounts for well-known politicians and federal judge Stanley Sporkin; and much more. A key CIA operative who was directly involved in the October Surprise operation that corrupted the presidential election between President Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, including the special role played by George H.W. Bush (Sr.); the CIA arming Islamic Afghan rebels fighting the westernizing government (prior to the arrival of Soviet forces); multiple CIA financial operations, including looting during the savings and loan scandals; and much more. An FBI Special Agent who worked in the New York, City offices where a key FBI supervisor was involved, for years, in the murders of American citizens with a Mafia capo. That FBI agent, a former highly decorated Lt. Colonel and helicopter pilot, repeatedly risked his life for rescuing wounded GIs under heavy fire. When he reported the internal FBI-DOJ corruption to members of Congress, who, as usual, did nothing but relay the letters to the FBI perpetrators, the power of that office was used to charge him with false crimes. That heroic former veteran was then sent to prison, where he still is. And many other interesting male and female sources involved in operations totally unknown to the American public. Legal Filing Combining Unprecedented Issues As Stich received information about the CIA drug smuggling and other matters that were serious crimes against the United States, he exercised his requirement under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, reporting additional criminal activities that he and his sources had discovered; and seeking relief from the ongoing illegal actions by California judges that were then resulting in the lost of his home. Further Criminalizing Attacks to Silence Corruption-Fighter That filing triggered an attack from the combination consisting of federal prosecutor David Levi and federal judges Milton Schwartz, Raul Ramirez, Edward Garcia, and magistrate John Moulds. They all participated in the charges against Captain Stich, by charging him with criminal contempt of court for having filed papers in the federal court that violated the prior illegal and unconstitutional order. The federal filing: Violated the Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial and Subjected to a Kangaroo Court A scheme such as this had little chance of succeeding in a jury trial. With Stich's Sacramento attorney, Joel Pegg, assisting federal prosecutor David Levi, Stich was denied his constitutional right to a jury trial, and was being charged, prosecuted and judged by the same groups criminally involved in the cover-ups of the corruption brought to their attention. Subverted by DOJ Prosecutor David Levi, Federal Judges— And Sabotaged by Personal Attorney Sacramento attorney, Joel Pegg, the attorney to which Stich had paid $20,000 (1980 dollars) to represent him, then sabotaged him, and acted to deprive Stich of his defenses. Just prior to the age of 70, and recovering from quadruple open heart surgery, the order from the federal judges that were themselves involved in criminal acts, sentenced Captain Stich to six months in federal prison. Supreme Court Justice Kennedy's Record In the Tragedy Enablers Stich filed a petition for emergency stay to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals judges on October 5, 1988, seeking to stay the sentence of six months incarceration. That was denied by the appellate judges as they protected the group and approved of the unprecedented civil and constitutional violations the criminal obstructions of justice that arose from blocking Stich's actions seeking to report the criminal activities and exercise federal defenses. That October 5, 1987, appeal was denied. Judge Anthony Kennedy's Complicity Stich was ordered to turn myself in on January 14, 1988; he had to act fast. Over the Christmas holidays, he prepared a petition to Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Anthony Kennedy (before he became a Justice of the United States Supreme Court). Stich worked to submit the petition for submission to Kennedy the following Monday. The wording in this petition to Judge Kennedy was similar to the wording filed in the October 5, 1987, appeal to the Ninth Circuit court of appeals. Kennedy denied the stay. On March 4, 1988, when Captain Stich appeared before Judge Raul Ramirez, expecting to be given a date to turn himself in, Judge Ramirez ordered him seized and imprisoned. Stich had not made arrangement for his loyal companion, Midas, nor the many other things that needed to be done. Rather than allow Stich to appear at the designated prison, at the age of 67, he was paraded from one prison to another, in chains, stopping at public facilities between prisons. He was put in solitary confinement for four weeks. There were times when he thought of committing suicide. But they had more to inflict upon the former Naval Aviator who had survived five years in World War II only to suffer greater harm from a greater and silent enemy. Federal district judge Anthony Kennedy was a judge in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at San Francisco from March 20, 1975, until leaving for his place on the Supreme Court of the United States in 1988. During this period on the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco, Judge Kennedy was one of the judges that: Approved the unlawful dismissal of Captain Stich's lawsuit against the FAA, which then enabled the ongoing aviation safety problems and corrupt acts to continue, enabled the history of fraud-enabled aviation disasters to continue for many years. Approved the unlawful dismissal of the lawsuit against the NTSB, enabling the falsification of official aviation accident reports, including the world record PSA crash into New York City (following the falsification of such fraud-enabled aviation disasters as the United Airline crashes into New York City on December 16, 1960; Denver; Salt Lake City; Portland, Oregon, and others), and cover-up in the downing of TWA Flight 800. Approved the denial of relief by federal judges in the sham lawsuit filed in the California courts by the San Francisco CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross; approved the gross violations of California and federal statutes and controlling decisional laws that were inflicting great and irreparable harm upon Stich. Approved the criminal contempt of court charges against Stich in retaliation for filing a federal action to halt the criminal activities that he and his group of other former government agents that were inflict great harm upon national interests. Approved the denial of a jury trial, causing Stich to be charged, judged, and sentenced by DOJ personnel and federal judges that were criminally complicit in the criminal activities being reported. Enabled the criminal activities to continue that played enabling roles in a series of terrorist successes. These included the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie; the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center; the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania; the downing of TWA Flight 800; the easily preventable and forewarned hijackings of four U.S. airliners on September 11, 2001. Kennedy's Lies At His Senate Confirmation Hearing Kennedy had testified at great lengths during his televised Senate confirmation hearing for appointment to the Supreme Court, expressing repeated concerns for due process, constitutional safeguards, respect for privacy. Kennedy denied me relief. The U.S. Senate confirmed Kennedy for the Supreme Court position on February 3, 1988, and he was sworn in a few days later. These matters were known to members of Congress. Captain Stich had kept them informed through letters from 1965 to that date and beyond. Other Related Filings An appeal brief to Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, April 1, 1989, which continued the 100 percent denial of every federal cause of action starting with the attempt in the 1970s to halt the corruption in the FAA and resulting catastrophic aviation events. A petition to the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco, March 4, 1991. Denied. A reply brief to 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 26, 1991. Denied. A petition for emergency relief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. January 22, 1992. Petitions sent to U.S. Supreme Court Justices were denied, thereby approving the latest tactic to silence the corruption-fighter. Exercising Another Federal Defense That Revealed Another Part of the Criminal Conspiracy The corruption-fighter was losing his home because the mortgage on his home needed to be replaced and the California judges refused to release the lis pendens they placed on the properties. Denied the defenses and protections in California law by California judges, and denied the defenses and protections in federal laws by federal judges in the district and appellate courts, the corruption-fighter sought one last remedy: Chapter 11 in the bankruptcy courts that permit a corporation to rearrange any financial or other problem and prevent loss of the properties. A bankruptcy court judge also has the responsibility to provide relief from the civil rights violations under Title 42 USC § 1983-1986. Anyone who knows of such violation and who is in a position to halt the violations, and fails to do so, violates the 1986 part of that Act. The corruption fighter relied on this responsibility in the Civil Rights statutes. His $10 million in real estate investments were in excellent financial condition, but the periodic renewal of mortgages that were a part of any real estate holdings were blocked by the lis pendens illegally placed by the California judges at the request of the CIA-front law firm, Friedman, Sloan and Ross, all a part of the civil rights violations. At the first couple of hearings, Los Vegas bankruptcy judge Robert Jones refused to take jurisdiction and stated he would issue an order removing the lis pendens, and dismay the bankruptcy filing. The corruption-fighter hired two attorneys to protect his interests: Las Vegas attorney Joshua Landish and San Francisco-area ____________ At that time, Stich was not aware of the massive corruption existing in the bankruptcy courts that involve Department of Justice trustees, federal judges, and cooperating lawyers. DOJ Personnel and Federal Judges Corruptly Seizing Assets That Funded Corruption-Fighting With immunity well established, no fear of retaliation anywhere in government, and the conspiracy including the most powerful groups in government, there was no limit to the blatant violations of every protection in the laws and constitution of the United States. The next stage was finishing off the corruption fighter, who at nearly 70 years of age, had no chance to recuperate. Again, two lawyers that Stich had paid to prevent the taking of his assets acted on behalf of the scheme. Court records clearly show the Las Vegas bankruptcy judge, Robert Jones and Stich's own Las Vegas attorney, Joshua Landish, discussing the seizure and liquidation of Stich's $10 million in assets (1980s value), without Stich's knowledge, without the constitutional due process rights of a hearing and legal cause. Stich hired that attorney to prevent the seizure of his assets. Instead, without Stich's knowledge—and obvious to bankruptcy judge Robert Jones—attorney Joshua Landish urged Judge Jones to seize and liquidate the $10 million in financially-sound and financially current real estate. (Judge Robert Jones was later promoted to U.S. District Judge in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada; DOJ prosecutor David Levi, who was part of the conspiracy, was promoted to a federal district court judge at Sacramento, California.) Transferring Case to Oakland, the Judicial Circuit Complicit in the Corruption The bankruptcy case was then transferred to Oakland, California, making it more convenient for the Friedman law firm to profit from the seizure. It was in a federal court system where most of the prior judicial cover-ups and complicity in the scheme existed. And it would be controlled by Department of Justice Trustee, Charles Duck. Criminal Contempt of Court Charge For Exercising Legal and Constitutional Right to Object To Illegal Life Asset Seizure In accordance with the laws and Constitution of the United States, Stich filed an objection to the seizure of his assets without cause and in violation of due process. After Stich filed an objection, federal bankruptcy judge Edward Jellen at Oakland charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for filing that defense. (Jones had previously issued an exercising the right to object to the corrupt seizure and liquidation of his life's assets.) These matters are detailed in a chapter from the book, Defrauding America. Media Attention Reported DOJ Trustee In Nation's Worst Trustee Corruption While Department of Justice trustee Charles Duck was liquidating Stich's properties, media publicity from the history of Duck's corrupt seizure of assets showed his conduct as the worst trustee bankruptcy in history. Media publicity forced Department of Justice personnel to file minor charges against Duck, sentencing him to a short term in a minimum security detention center. After being criminally charged, federal judges awarded Charles Duck funds from the criminal liquidation of Stich's assets. Murder of Attorney Reporting Corruption In the Same Bankruptcy Courts While Stich was experiencing these events, a San Rafael attorney, Dexter Jacobson, had an appointment with FBI agents at San Francisco to provide evidence of the corruption that Stich was also experiencing. Primary people at risk were federal judges and Department of Justice personnel—and that could easily expand to include the matters in which Captain Stich was involved, including the dozens of federal judgments, Department of Justice personnel, the corruption that Stich and his sources had discovered, California judges—and the decades of complicity by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. (Before considering this to be too bizarre, remember the decades of judicial filings and the unprecedented action by highly respected U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron White.) These matters are described in the not-for-profit book by Captain Rodney Stich, Defrauding America. Legal Filings Related to Asset Seizure Petition to U.S. Supreme Court for illegal and unconstitutional property seizure , September 5, 1994. The $10 million in property that was seized provided the funds that exposed the corruption that Stich and his group of insiders had discovered, including the corruption involving Department of Justice personnel and federal judges that seized the properties. Petition for relief to U.S. Supreme Court, August 15, 1994, seeking relief from the judicial seizure of $10 million in assets that funded exposure of the corruption in government offices. Life Assets Seized, Without Hearing or Cause: Your Supreme Court Justices in Action Life assets seized without hearing, without cause, and through the criminal misuse of government powers by Department of Justice personnel, dozens of federal judges, and the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. (Remember this as you recite the pledge of allegiance, and get to the words, "with liberty and justice for all.") Another Criminal Contempt of Court By San Francisco Federal Judge Vaughn Walker Prison, taking of life assets, humiliation, confronted with criminal misuse of every form of liberty and justice, still another criminal act by federal judges was inflicted upon Captain Stich. (Remember, all of these attacks resulted from hiss acceptance of the official life-and-death assignment years earlier!) At the end of the first six months in prison, including four weeks of solitary confinement, another criminal contempt of court charge was filed against Stich by San Francisco federal judges Marilyn Patel and Vaughn Walker, for an earlier attempt to report the criminal activities in a federal court outside of the Ninth Circuit. As Stich was released, he was again charged with criminal contempt of court and while waiting for trial, confined to house arrest. Four years later, the criminal contempt of court charge was suddenly cancelled. At that time, the corruption that Stich and his confidants had discovered played an enabling role in: The prior sampling of aviation disasters enabled by problems in the "tombstone agency. The life-destroying harm inflicted upon individual Americans. The downing and DOJ corruption related to Pan Am Flight 103. And the subsequent catastrophic events resulting from the corruption Stich reported: Bombing of World Trade Center, despite prior information of the planned bombing, the names of the bombers, and the Jersey City self-storage unit where the bomb was being constructed, another consequences of the corrupt culture of key personnel in the U.S Department of Justice. The downing of TWA Flight 800, despite prior notice of the planned event. The bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, despite prior notice of the planned event. The continuing murders of American citizens involving brutal crime figures in the Boston and New York City offices, that involved FBI-DOJ personnel. The easily preventable and forewarned horrific hijackings of four U.S. airliners on September 11, 2001 that would not have occurred were it not fort the deep-seated problems in the "tombstone agency" and the corrupt and criminal culture in the U.S. Department of Justice (aided by other enablers). Possible Reason for Dropping The Criminal Contempt of Court Charges Possibly motivating the dropping of criminal contempt of court charges were the worsening of the catastrophic events made possible by the corruption in government positions that Captain Stich and his group had discovered, tried to report and halt, and for which he was targeted by possibility the nation's most encompassing conspiracy to silenced a whistleblower and corruption fighter. The Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie had occurred The World Trade Center bombing had occurred. Unprecedented Lawsuit Named the Justices Of U.S. Supreme Court as Defendants, Based on Deadly Cover-Ups The complicity in these events by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court caused Captain Stich to file a lawsuit against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court (Oct 20, 1989, Nr. 89-2941) in the federal courts in the District of Columbia. The purpose of the lawsuit was to focus public attention on the charges in that lawsuit and alert the public to the serious misconduct in powerful government institutions. That lawsuit was not dismissed as soon as it was filed. Criminal statutes do not provide immunity against the criminal acts of any government personnel, and especially those entrusted to prevent such crimes: personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice, federal judges, and Supreme Court Justices. They are virtually never prosecuted unless their conduct generate a backlash against Department of Justice personnel (as occurred with two federal judges, Robert Aguilar, in San Jose, because of his criticism of DOJ conduct); and Harry Claiborne in Las Vegas. Since media people examine lawsuits filed in federal court, and since this might be the only lawsuit in the nation's history filed against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, it would be of media interest. Instead, media personnel and media corporations, that had for decades kept information on hardcore criminality by high government personnel from the public—as they had done for decades, especially the decades of CIA drug smuggling—kept the information about the lawsuit and the charges from the American public. The Justices' reply to the lawsuit raised the defense that the Justices were immune from lawsuits. Nothing was said to deny the validly of the charges—as in prior or subsequent lawsuits. As with the decades of criminal misconduct involving high government officials. America's media personnel and media corporations covered up this unprecedented lawsuit. To have done otherwise would have provided information that could adversely affect the system if a sufficient percentage of the American public reacted. Secret CIA-Funded Bank Account For Federal Judge Stanley Sporkin CIA personnel had described to Stich the close relationship of CIA personnel and federal judges. CIA general Counsel Stanley Sporkin, was instance, became a federal judge in the powerful District of Columbia courts. Records provided to Stich by the head of the covert CIA operation based in Honolulu, BBRDW, Sporkin was shown as having a secret CIA bank account corruptly funded by the CIA. In several of Captain Stich's books, including Defrauding America, and Explosive Secrets of Covert CIA Companies, Stich reported a discovery he made while examining boxes of CIA documents from a secret CIA operation based in Honolulu, known as BBRDW. The boxes were given to Stich by the former titular head of that CIA operation and by the San Francisco law office of Melvin Belli. In those boxes was a envelope containing a hand-written list containing the names of six people that has secret CIA bank accounts funded by the CIA, and the code names for each of the accounts. Among the more recognized names were Vice-President George Bush; Richard Armitage, and Stanley Sporkin. Armitage was a United States Deputy Secretary of State at the State Department. From 1983 to 1989, he was Assistant Secretary of Defense. The code name for Sporkin's account was Slimy Affirm. Sporkin's Conduct Continued into Federal Courts Approximately ten years prior to 9/11, as corruption-enabled terrorist successes were occurring, Stich tried to report and halt the corruption by filing a federal action under the federal crime reporting statute, in the federal courts in the District of Columbia. Former CIA legal counsel and then federal judge, Stanley Sporkin, blocked the reporting of those matters. In 1990, as the corruption was enabling the start of terrorist successes, Captain Stich submitted for filing in the federal courts in the District of Columbia a federal crime report (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4). Judge Stanley Sporkin, former general counsel for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), continued the judicial practice of refusing the file the action. Stich filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals. Department of Justice personnel filed a motion for summary affirmance to dismiss the appeal. Stich filed an May 22, 1990, opposition to the motion for summary affirmance/dismissal. The court of appeal judges supported Sporkin's illegal dismissal. Emergency Petition Reporting Deadly Corruption— And Unprecedented Apology By Supreme Court Justice Byron White The corruption and the consequences were both becoming worse. In 1991, Stich sent a 60-page Emergency Petition to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron White, while the lawsuit against the Supreme Court Justices was still in the courts. Justice White had a reputation for a high level of integrity and his unprecedented response indicated his concern for the charges made in that Emergency Petition. . Justice White's unprecedented personal response, dated October 28, 1991, reflected his concern, as he apologized in writing for not being able—as single Justice—to help. It was surely the first time in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court that one of the Justices, informed of crimes against the United States, resulting in great tragedies and threatening the security of the nation, put in words his concern and inability to help in such important matters. What powerful force kept him from acting? That response strongly suggested a powerful force existed that required the U.S. Supreme Court Justices to become complicit in criminal activities that had, and would continue to have, catastrophic consequences. Shortly after that October 1991 letter, Justice White retired, in early 1993. He died on April 16, 2002. There Were Grave Consequences During the Above Offenses The sequence of the documentary: World record number of fraud-enabled aviation disasters starting in the 1960s.. Life and death assignment given to former Naval Aviator, international airline captain, and present federal airline safety inspector to halt the serious crash-enabled problems at a politically powerful airline that was experiencing a world record number of airline crashes. Attacks on that inspector as he discovered, reported, and attempts to correct the serious problems. Unprecedented actions taken by the corruption-fighter as he sought to halt the continuing tragedies. Documentary of the unprecedented gross and criminal misuse of government power, seeking to halt the actions of the corruption-fighter, and the complicity of Supreme Court Justices. The calamitous latest results made possible by the above—and their cooperating shills. Sampling of the Consequences of the Corruption The Pan Am Flight 103 bombing over Lockerbie—made possible by a covert CIA-drug smuggling operation at London. The bombing was retaliation for the U.S. shooting down of an Iranian Airliner killing 290 people. The tragedy was compounded by the corrupt acts of Department of Justice personnel: planting evidence to shift blame from the two groups responsible to two innocent Libyans, and Libya. The World Trade Center bombing, February 26, 1993. enabled by corrupt culture in FBI and other Department of Justice offices, including the retaliation of a reliable source inside the al Qaeda community and a female FBI agent who had provided advance information on the planned bombing; the names of the al Qaeda members working on constructing the bomb; and the Jersey City public storage site where the bomb was being constructed. The downing of TWA Flight 800, several weeks after Department of Justice personnel deep-sixth advance notice of the planned downing of a U.S. airliner departing the local New York City airport. Bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. August 7, 1998. The easily preventable and forewarned hijackings of four U.S. airliners on September 11, 2001. Terrorist attacks on U.S. aircraft during the 1960s through 1980s, that were easily preventable by the "tombstone agency," as were the terrorist attacks on 9/11. Harm to individual Americans directly inflicted and enabled Catastrophic type of events enabled by the corruption and personnel and groups Life-altering harm to individual Americans. Last Judicial Filings Prior to September 11, 2001, Listing Corruption That Would Made 9/11 Possible The issues were so important that Stich could not simply give up. As the terrorist successes made possible by the widespread corruption, he submitted for filing a lawsuit in federal courts at Oakland, California. Despite the gravity of the charges made in that lawsuit, federal judges refused to file it, continuing the corrupt conduct that started 20 years earlier. Stich then filed the lawsuit in the Reno federal courts. Being further removed from the federal courts in California, where Stich encountered 30 years of judicial anarchy, the Reno lawsuit did not encounter the immediate dismissal. However, every request by Stich for the defendants to respond to interrogatives and allow the action to proceed were blocked by U.S. District Judge Edward Reed. Even after 9/11 showed another tragedy made possible by the corruption reported in that action, Judge Reed dismissed the action before it could get started. The judges in the Ninth Circuit at San Francisco continued their approval of the unlawful dismissal as they had done since the 1970s. (However, the court of appeals judges did acknowledge the gravity of the charges in the action against the FAA and NTSB.) Urgent Letters and Emergency Petitions Sent Direct To Supreme Court Justices In 2001—Prior to 9/11 Certified letter sent to Justice Anthony Kennedy on Jan. 2, 2001. No response. The gravity of the charges made, by a person who was in positions to have learned of such matters, and his decades of credibility, made it either irresponsible not to seek information—or the necessity to protect themselves and their peers from the consequences of their conduct. Certified letter to Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, January 2, 2001. The same letter was sent to the other Justices, including Justice Ginsberg, January 2, 2001; and Justice Souter, Jan02, 2001.pdf. Petition for Emergency Petition to Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor, Jan. 5, 2001. raising the issues of the crime reporting responsibilities; the ongoing consequences of the federal offenses; the gross attacks on the reporter of the corruption that criminalized the Department of Justice and the federal courts. Certified letter to Justice Clarence Thomas, January 15, 2001, combined with emergency petition for relief, describing documented criminal activities in government offices, being reported to a federal official under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, requiring the reporting of such serious matters to a federal judge or other federal official (including Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court). The letter stated in part: "The judicial corruption continues to make possible the infliction of grave harm upon the United States, undermining the rights and protections under the laws and Constitution of the United States, and subverts the internal security of the United States. ... The enclosed petition for extraordinary writ is being submitted to you because of the refusal by Justice Sandra O’Connor to respond to a prior petition sent to her under Supreme Court Rule 22. ... These are matters that fall within the areas of supervisory responsibilities of Supreme Court Justices, and under federal civil rights and criminal statutes. Misuse of the federal courts in the Ninth Circuit as a racketeering enterprise." Emergency Petition to Justice Clarence Thomas, Feb. 8, 2001. Emergency Petition to Justice Thomas, Feb. 15. 2001, Petition to Justice Thomas, February 15, 2001. Certified letters, April 11, 2001, sent to Chief Justice Rehnquist and each of the Justices of the Supreme Court. Most Horrific Terrorist Successes in U.S. History— Enabled by the Worst Internal Corruption In the Nation's History: 9/11 The September 11 events started with four groups of hijackers boarding four different airliners at approximately the same time. Then, after the aircraft were airborne, seizing the cockpit door keys from the mostly female flight attendants and than opening the door to the cockpit. The suddenly confronted pilots were easily incapacitated by the long knives that the FAA allowed to be carried aboard the aircraft. One hijacked airliner, American Airlines Flight 11 departed from Boston’s Logan Airport for Los Angeles at approximately 8 a.m. Hijackers crashes that aircraft into the North Tower of the World Trade Center at 8:46 a.m.; United Airlines Flight 175 also left from Logan Airport, at 8:14, enroute to Los Angeles. It was flown into the South Tower of the World Trade Center at 9:03 a.m.; American Airlines Flight 77 departed Washington's Dulles International Airport in Virginia at 8:20 a.m., enroute to Los Angeles. That airliner was crashed into the Pentagon at 9:37 a.m.; United Airlines Flight 93 departed Newark International Airport at 8:42 a.m,, enroute to San Francisco. That aircraft dove into the ground at Shanksville, Pennsylvania at 10:03 a.m. Almost 3,000 people endured these horrific events. If the American public knew of the corruption that preceded and enabled those events to occur, especially the corruption of personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice, corrupt federal judges, and the complicity of the Supreme Court Justices, the reaction of the American public would have had devastating consequences for those people in government that enabled these horrors to occur. Secrecy from the Public This sampling of facts had been made known for years by Captain Stich to members of Congress, to media personnel and corporations, and other sources, all of whom had a moral and legal responsibility to contact Stich and examine his evidence. None did, becoming enablers of the continuing crimes against the United States and the resulting harm and catastrophic events. They now had a self-serving interest in continuing the cover-ups. Two Sets of World-Record Aviation Disasters In New York City Two sets of world-record aviation disasters occurred in New York City. The first occurred on December 16, 1960. The corrupt enabling contacts in that disaster and several others of that same airline were the reason why FAA airline safety inspector was given the unprecedented and official life-and-death-assignment that enabled him to discover the high-level corruption in major government positions, that started the powerful attacks against him. Both of those two world record related airline disasters in New York City involved Captain Rodney Stich exposing their enabling corruption. In the second series of aviation disasters in New York City on September 11, 2001, it was Captain Stich exposing and acting to halt the enabling corruption before the horrors occurred. Post-9/11 Judicial Cover-Up in DC Courts Captain Stich sought to report the corruption that enabled the deadly multiple hijackings by submitting an action to the federal court in Washington, DC, on April 22, 2002. That action was submitted for filing under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. It addressed the serious problems in the Federal Aviation Administration and elsewhere. When Captain Stich never received the file-stamped copy, he sent a letter to the clerk of the court, June 20, 2002, questioning why the filing was blocked. District Judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly issued an order, July 1, 2002, that blocked filing the petition and even denying him the right to appeal the illegal act. Captain Stich sent a letter to federal district judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly, Aug. 12, 2002, requesting an explanation for refusing to file the lawsuit. No response Stich filed a statement of issues in the notice of appeal, Sep. 30, 2002. Stich submitted for filing an appeal brief, December 6, 2002, which was stamped received December 9, 2002. The appellate judges, fully aware of the gravity of the charges, issued an order dated January 16, 2003, refusing to hear the appeal on the basis of Judge Stanley Sporkin's order 11 years earlier, permanently barring Stich access to the federal courts. The severity of the corruption had reached monumental proportions. Stich filed an appeal brief with the court of appeals for an en banc hearing. Every appellate judge in the most powerful and influential federal appeal court in the nation was then aware of the serious charges. The enbanc appeal was stamped "received" on January 27, 2003. The entire appellate court then issued an order refusing to hear the matter, and signed by court of appeal judges Edwards, Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel, and Garland, March 26, 2006. By their documented conduct, they: A May 15, 2003, order stated refusal to hear the matter. All of these judges knew of the attempts by a former federal agent to report the documented criminal activities that had enabled to occur a long series of airline disasters, and which could be expected to have played a prominent role in the hijackings of four airliners on 9/11. The issues now were to protect the dozens of federal judges and others, and disregard the consequences of the cover-ups, as was obvious from the worsening consequences in the very beginning. All of the judges also knew that: The federal crime reporting statute required that federal judges receive information on a federal crime that was offered, and that the requirement is mandatory, as part of the judge's administrative duties. And that blocking the reports were felonies under the obstruction of justice statutes. Stich submitted a Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. No action was taken. Post-9/11 Judicial Cover-Up in New York City Courts After the filing was blocked by every level in the federal courts in the District of Columbia, Captain Stich submitted for filing a lawsuit in the federal courts in New York on August 8, 2002. The judicial obstruction of justice continued. Even though the filing meet the guidelines and the filing fee that required the court to file the action, it was instead stamped as "received" (August 8, 2002). Chief Judge Michael Mukasey refused to allow it to be filed, violating the due process right to federal court access, federal filing rules, and by blocking reports of major federal crimes, covered up for the horrendous 9/11 consequences made possible by the series of prior judicial cover-ups. The documentary evidence of a serious conspiracy with grave implications continued to grow. Repeat Notice to Supreme Court Justices After nearly a year of attempting to get the case filed, Stich sent a letter to Chief Justice William Rehnquist and each of the other Supreme Court Justices, advising them of the latest judicial obstruction of justice tactic that was occurring in areas for which they had supervisory responsibilities. Eventually, after a repeat of these letters, Chief Judge in the federal courts in New York City, Michael Mukasey, then filed the lawsuit on September 22, 2003, that by law he should have allowed to be filed 13 months earlier. The Supreme Court Justices had by law oversight responsibilities over federal district and appellate judges, and were made aware of their obstruction of justice and other offenses since the 1970s. Those letters put the Justices on notice, again, as done repeatedly since the 1970s, of the federal crimes that were resulting in great harm to national security, and presented by a person who was in a position to have discovered the corruption, tragedies occurred before and after his reports, and who had outstanding credibility. Mukasey's Deception with Supreme Court Justices' Complicity After those letters were sent, he was apparently secretly ordered by the Supreme Court Justices to file the action, and obviously kept informed what happened next. Judge Mukasey allowed the action to be filed—and simultaneously issued an order, September 22, 2003, dismissing the action; again violating civil filing procedures and obstructing the reporting, on , of possibly the worse charges ever filed in the federal courts These are mandatory requirements by federal judges, and not rights that can be withheld, such as attempts to keep secret major crimes against the United States by judges entrusted to provide these rights. In that filing, a major cause of action arose under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, which requires a federal judge to receive information of a federal crime repeated by anyone knowing of such an offense. Stich, with a vast background involving such matters, and unquestioned credibility, and the ultra gravity of his charges, far exceeded the requirements to received the information in the federal filing. Federal law requires that the allegations made in the Complaint must be accept as true to determine if a federal cause of action had been stated. Dennis v. Sparks 449 U.S. 24 (1980)("For the purposes of testing sufficiency of the complaint, the allegations of the complaint must be accepted as true.”) If a federal cause of action had been stated, federal judges must provide a the Plaintiff the right to a court hearing, and judicial relief if the charges are established. Federal law requires that Supreme Court justices reply to a filing submitted, even if it is denied. Supreme Court Rule 22.6: "The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an application." Following their prior practice, many submissions were never acknowledged. To do so would have made a record of the fact that the Justices were made aware of the very serious charges and did nothing about them. Notice of Appeal to Court of Appeals in New York City— The Site of Two World-Record Aviation Disasters: 40 Years Apart Stich filed a Notice of Appeal, Oct. 14, 2003, as provided by law. That was followed with an Appeal Brief filed January 3, 2004. That appeal made the judges aware of a major national and judicial scandal, that would be exposed if the lawsuit was allowed to continue. In response to the DOJ filing a motion to dismiss, Stich filed an Objection to Dismiss, June 3, 2004. When the Department of Justice never filed the required reply brief, Stich filed a Declaration of Filing Irregularities, Feb. 23, 2004. The U.S. Attorney then filed his brief. Stich then filed his Reply Brief, Feb. 29, 2004. Oral argument given by Rodney Stich to Court of Appeal judges in New York City on August 24, 2004. Dismissal order by Court of Appeals judges. Petition for rehearing before the entire Court of Appeals Sep. 7, 2004, New York City, en banc, before all the appellate judges, following refusal of the court of appeal to correct the serious blocking actions by Judge Mukasey. (Mukasey was later promoted to U.S. Attorney General of the United States, a standard promotion reaction for those who protect the corruption in the system.) Appeal brief, Sep. 7, 2004 enbanc to Federal Court of Appeals, New York, presenting the serious issues to every federal court of appeals judges in that circuit. Appeal denied, making every federal appellate judge in the circuit aware of the serious matters and becoming enablers. Stich submitted for filing a petition for writ of certiorari and writ of mandamus sup_crt_pet_jan_5_2005.pdf January 5, 2005, petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court of serious matters that included the complicity of the district and appellate judges in that judicial circuit. The introductory "Questions Presented" section of that brief stated: QUESTIONS PRESENTED Petitioner presents the following questions for review: 1. Whether federal judges can legally block Petitioner, or any other former federal agent, or citizen, from reporting federal crimes under the mandatory requirement of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. 2. Whether judicial orders permanently barring Petitioner from filing any papers in the federal district and appellate courts, deprives him of the fundamental rights and protections guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States. 3. Whether federal judges can issue unlawful and unconstitutional orders that inflict great and irreparable personal and financial harm upon Petitioner, and then issue unlawful and unconstitutional orders preventing him from exercising legal and constitutional defenses. 4. Whether the abundance of documentary evidence indicates that judicial orders terminating Petitioner’s exercise of legal and constitutional protections were intended, and acted, to prevent Petitioner from reporting criminal conduct of government officials, and deprive Petitioner the protections intended by U.S. laws and Constitution. 5. Whether Petitioner’s attempt to protect national interests by reporting federal crimes, and exercising federal defenses against violations of federally protected rights, met the legal definition of frivolous filings of a vexatious litigant—or a tactic to block him from reporting deadly misconduct by people in government positions. 6. Whether federal district and appellate judges can legally and constitutionally permanently terminate Petitioner’s legal and constitutional right to file papers in federal district, which then terminates the rights and protections guaranteed to all other people. 7. Whether the acts of district and appellate court justices constitute a racketeering enterprise. 8. Whether federal judges can order the seizure and liquidation of Petition’s $10 million in lifetime assets, without a hearing, without notice of hearing, without legally recognized cause. 9. Whether orders can thereafter be rendered barring Petitioner from filing objections to such seizure and liquidation, and then, when objections are filed, they are ordered unfilled, and Petitioner charged with criminal contempt of court for exercising such legal and constitutional rights. 10.Whether the obstruction of justice acts by federal judges enabled to occur the conditions that made it possible for terrorists to hijack four airliners on September 11, 2001, among other preventable national tragedies.  Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. ------------------------------- Summation of legal actions from New York City filings: www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_nyc_index.html. 9/11 Commission Cover-Ups Enabled By Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices The last cover-up by the Supreme Court Justices enabled the continuation of the corruption in the 9/11 Commission;. The commission included the Department of Justice personnel who had been part of the deep-sixing of advance notice of the series of horrific al Qaeda attacks, enabling the cover-up of the worsening consequences. It also protected other 9/11 enablers. Partial list of letters to the 9/11 Commission. Corrupt DOJ-Controlled 9/11 Commission Enabled Even Worse Consequences The corrupt culture led to lies that preceded the horrifically deadly invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, neither of whom know of the planned all Qaeda attacks. Iraq was one of the Middle East most westernized nations and the major block to the existence of terrorists (as it subsequently became after the invasion). The U.S. horrific killing of innocent people outraged people throughout the Middle East and Africa. The motivation for the initial series of attacks by the small al Qaeda group (that was motivated by the Israeli--U.S. brutalities upon the Palestinians) exploded into multiple groups, including the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). There is very little protection against the onslaught of people so outraged by these invasions that they are willing to die as they kill Americans. The genie is out of its bottle! Did the Decades of Complicity by Supreme Court Justices Make Them Included in the List of 9/11 Enablers? The facts and documented speak for themselves. Either every statement made here is false, or there exists the greatest usurpation of government power in the history of the United States, and unthinkable in any modern nation. Either way, thousands of people suffered horrendous over a period of decades, from the consequences of the underlying corruption—and the cover-ups of that corruption. Sampling of information sites: Decades of horrific aviation disasters enabled by problems in "the tombstone agency." Life-and-death-assignment. Tragedies after tragedies suffered by the American people. Decades of corruption of personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice resulting in great harm to individual. Americans and to national security. FBI-DOJ murderous culture that was compatible with other corrupt conduct Department of Justice corruption. DOJ related or enabled American tragedies. DOJ enabled terrorist attacks. DOJ obstructing justice. DOJ crimes and resulting tragedies. Department of Justice corruption. Department of Justice silencing tactics. DOJ related or enabled American tragedies. DOJ crimes and resulting tragedies. Harm to individual Americans of another kind. Harm to people of other nations, such as Korea, Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq, the Palestinians, and others. Harm to national security that will escalate into a form for which there is no meaningful defense. American public as a feeding trough, enabled by media cover-ups and attacks on whistleblowers. DOJ deep sixing information on planned terrorist attacks Department of Justice scheme to silence the corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, after he was given an unprecedented and official life-and-death-assignment to halt the years of corruption-enabled aviation disasters. Captain Stich, a former Naval Aviator and Patrol Plane Commander, was brutalized to keep him from carrying out that major official assignment. DOJ scheme Against the corruption-fighter, that started with a San Francisco CIA-FBI- front filing a sham and bizarre lawsuit that required the cooperation of every level of the California judicial system and then an endless series of federal judges and Supreme Court Justices. DOJ-Judicial secrets as federal judges and Department of Justice personnel protected each other in criminal activities. The primary enablers of the 9/11 attacks (and several others) were government and other personnel in the United States. Acorn_to_oak_tree scenario of how small corruption in the U.S. became giant corruption. Part list of federal filings sent to the U.S. Supreme Court Justices. lawsuit list. Partial list of letters sent to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court relating to the corrupt-criminal activities that Stich and his group of insiders had discovered, starting with their official or insider duties. Partial list of notifications to U.S. Supreme Court and its Justices. On a basis of lies, U.S. politicians approved the start of the longest war in U.S. history: the bombings and invasion of Afghanistan, even though the people and the Taliban government had no knowledge of the planned 9/11 attacks. Media Articles Revealing Simpler Character Traits Of U.S. Supreme Court Justices One of many newspaper articles showing Supreme Court justices receiving favors that would affect their conduct was the following article in a New York Times editorial (January 27, 2006), showing the Justices engaging in the same conduct as the lobbyist, Abramoff and members of Congress. Titled, Justice and Junkets" the article stated: Justice Antonin Scalia certainly has poor judgment when it comes to vacations. Justice Scalia was apparently unchastened by the criticism of his 2004 duck-hunting excursion with Vice President Dick Cheney, one of the term's most prominent Supreme Court litigants. Last September, he skipped the swearing-in of Chief Justice John Roberts Jr. because of another ethically dubious trip, this time to the posh Ritz-Carlton at the Beaver Creek ski resort in Colorado. He was there to teach a 10-hour seminar over a couple of days for a conservative group, the Federalist Society. "Nightline" recently reported that the gig left Justice Scalia plenty of time for tennis, fly-fishing and socializing with the group's members, some of whom have business before the Supreme Court. One Federal Society cocktail reception was sponsored in part by the lobbying and law firm that used to employ Jack Abramoff, Tom DeLay's convicted pal and benefactor for golf vacations. Justice Scalia's travel is part of a broader affliction on the federal bench. The Los Angeles Times reported in 2004, for example, that Justice Clarence Thomas had accepted thousands of dollars in gifts in recent years, including an $800 leather jacket, a $1,200 set of tires from Nascar and an extravagant vacation from a conservative activist. Federal judges below the Supreme Court level accept dozens of free vacations each year from well-heeled special interests under the guise of "judicial education." The judicial lobbying problem is more serious in one respect than the scandal enveloping Congress. Lawmakers operate in an overtly political environment, but the decision-making process of judges is supposed to be impermeable to clever efforts by special interests to buy access and favor. Documented Conduct Meets Criteria For Crimes Of Obstruction of Justice and RICO Racketeering Enterprise Definition of Obstruction of Justice Criminal statute, Title 18 USC § 1503 makes it a crime to threaten, intimidate, or retaliate against these participants in a criminal or civil proceeding. In addition, section 1503 makes it illegal to attempt the bribery of an official to alter the outcome of a judicial proceeding. Besides these specific prohibitions in section 1503, the Omnibus Clause states that a person who "corruptly or by threats of force, or by threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice" is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice. This clause offers broad protection to the "due administration of justice." Federal courts have read this clause expansively to proscribe any conduct that interferes with the judicial process. Definition of Racketeering Enterprise The documented conduct of the federal judges and the Supreme Court Justices repeatedly blocked the reporting of federal crimes (and Department of Justice personnel), meeting the definition of obstruction of justice. The way that it was done also meets the definition of a Racketeering Enterprise. Federal criminal statute, Title 18 § 1503, in the Omnibus Clause, states that a person [or group] who: "corruptly or by threats of force, or by threatening letter or communication, influences, obstructs, or impedes, or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede, the due administration of justice" is guilty of the crime of obstruction of justice. Federal courts have read this clause expansively to proscribe any conduct that interferes with the judicial process, and broadly applied this statute to the "due administration of justice." See also: Obstructing justice statutes. Obstruction of justice tactics. Credibility of This Information The credibility of this information is reflected by: The dozens of documents filed in federal courts, including those sent to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the responses. The close relationship between the reported corrupt conduct and the harm resulting from it. The documented and unprecedented actions taken by Department of Justice personnel, dozens of federal judges, and Supreme Court Justices, that were major civil, constitutional, and criminal offenses, and even meeting the criteria of a Racketeering Enterprise (RICO). The decades of credibility by the corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, and his several dozen key sources from covert and law enforcement operations, all of whom were there. His corruption-fighting efforts went far beyond that of a whistleblower, and started after he was given an unprecedented, official, life-and-death-assignment, as a federal airline safety inspector for the Federal Aviation Agency. That assignment was to halt the aviation safety problems, including corrupt and criminal activities, that enabled decades of horrific aviation disasters to occur. The misconduct was at a politically-powerful airline and the politics, incompetence, and corruption at the government's aviation safety agency known to knowledgeable insiders at that time as the "tombstone agency." Five Years Fighting a Foreign Enemy—Only To Return Home to a More Sinister Enemy And Suffer Far Worse Harm! Captain Rodney Stich spent five years in the U.S. Navy during World War II, a Naval Aviator and Patrol Plane Commander. The Japanese enemy made known their intent. In the United States, Stich enemies—and these of the American public, though they don't recognize the source of their harm. Cowardly and criminally, these merchants of corruption, harm, and deaths, hide behind their official position of trust, subverting the laws and constitution of the United States, as they Subvert the United States to their own corrupt activities. After 40 Years, Giving Up the Fight After 40 years of fighting a lonely and traumatic crusade, Captain Stich finally gave up the fight through the judicial and other government system. With the dumbing down of the American people, their obsession with trivia, fixation on tiny screens and 140-character mental limitation, it appeared hopeless. All further articles are for the purpose of showing how the "American people made possible most of the tragedies that occurred. Documentaries in Not-for-Profits Books Based on Personal Discoveries of Several Dozen Insiders: CIA, FBI, DEA Over a dozen highly detailed and documented books revealing a nation's leaders as riddled with corruption with a history of resulting tragedies. These are heavily details books written by granddaddy of corruption-exposing whistleblower Rodney Stich with input from an unprecedented number of key personnel involved in covert and overt activities. They provide the material for a peaceful "Arab Spring" outrage among courageous Americans. (These books are available in print and digital format at www.amazon.com; www.google.com; and other web sites. At each site, put "Rodney Stich" into the search box for a list of these books. All of the books are available at amazon.com, in print and on digital formats, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich. Sampling of early books reviews. Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich. Commendation of the granddaddy of corruption reporting whistleblowers. His background and credibility. Bio on granddaddy of corruption exposing and corruption fighting whistleblowers.