Notification to Supreme Court Justices of crimes against the United States.

<body> Sequence of Notification To Supreme Court Justices The Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court had been repeatedly informed, by legal filings, legal submissions, and letters of ongoing corruption constituting major crimes against the United States associated with a continuing series of catastrophic consequences. First were series of lawsuits against the FAA and NTSB related to corruption that enabled to occur a series of major aviation disasters. Legal submissions to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Sampling of letters sent directly to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Major Crimes Against United States Reported to Supreme Court Justices Corruption in the government's aviation safety offices resulting in a continuing series of aviation disasters. Criminal activities that were crimes against the United States discovered by former federal agent Rodney Stich and his coalition of other insiders. Felony cover-ups−obstruction of justice−by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities. Felony retaliation against a former federal agent as he attempted to report the federal crimes to a federal judge under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute. The conspiracy involving federal judges that met the legal definition of a criminal racketeering enterprise, the national disasters made possible by that misconduct. Pattern of major civil and constitutional violations against that former federal agent−that were part of the criminal obstruction of justice cover-ups. Justices' Initial Notification The first documented obstruction of justice by Supreme Court justices occurred in the mid-1970s, when former federal agent Rodney Stich sought to report criminal activities associated with a series of airline disasters that he discovered and reported while he was a federal aviation safety agent. These criminal activities were being reported to a federal judge under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute. That statute requires that federal judges receive the information of a federal crime from anyone knowing of such a crime, and must be received as part of the judge's administrative duties rather than judicial duties. After 1978, when Stich published the first of many books on corruption in government offices, and started appearing as guest and expert on hundreds of radio and television shows, an endless series of other former government agents and insiders started providing Stich with information on corruption in other areas of government that they had discovered as part of their official duties. To block the reporting of these crimes against the United States, Department of Justice lawyers and federal judges engaged in a continuing pattern of unlawful and unconstitutional, and criminal, acts against Stich, which obstructed justice. These actions included, for instance: Repeatedly dismissing the federal filings in which Stich and his group of other former government agents sought to report the criminal activities. Rendered unlawful and unconstitutional orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. To halt Stich's publicizing of the corruption through books and his nationwide appearances on radio and television, a series of legal actions were taken against him, first by the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross in San Francisco and certain of their lawyers. The first action filed by the CIA-front law firm against Stich, with bizarre aspects, was filed in the California courts at Fairfield, California, requiring over a dozen California judges to repeatedly violate large numbers of California and federal laws and constitutional protections. Orders were repeatedly rendered by California judges from 1982 to 1988, that inflicted great personal and financial harm upon Stich. In addition to the massive violations, California judges retaliated when Stich exercised legal defenses, calling these frivolous acts of a vexatious litigant. This repeated retaliation were criminal acts arising from retaliating against a person for exercising constitutionally protected rights, and indirectly constituted obstruction of justice crimes on the basis that the actions were attempts to prevent Stich from reporting the criminal activities that he and a group of other former government agent shad discovered during their official duties. Any one of those many orders, and any one of those dozens of state or federal laws or constitutional rights that were violated, constituted violations of federally protected rights for which there were federal remedies. Federal judges had the duty to provide a federal court forum and order a halt to these violations of federally protected rights. But these were the same federal judges who repeatedly blocked the reporting of criminal activities. When Stich exercised these federal defenses in federal court, federal judges compounded the violations of federally protected rights by aiding and abetting the violations. They protected the CIA-front law firm and lawyers, and California judges, who were perpetrating the violations, and retaliated against Stich for exercising the defenses guaranteed by the laws and constitution of the United States. From 1984 to the present date, federal judges have blocked and violated the right to seek relief in federal courts. In addition to obstructing justice by refusing to receive the information of the deadly federal crimes, several federal judges rendered orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. The effect, and surely the intent, of these unlawful and unconstitutional orders were to block Stich from reporting the federal crimes (obstruction of justice acts), and to block Stich from defending against the legal tactics intended to halt Stich's exposure actions (which were other forms of obstruction of justice). These orders also converted Stich to a man without a country, in that he was no longer protected by the laws and Constitution of the United States, a right that even murderers are not denied. When Stich learned of criminal activities from his CIA sources and sought to again report them under the federal crime reporting statute, he was charged with criminal contempt of court. Stich was required by the federal crime reporting statute to make such reports, and had a right to do as a citizen of the Unite States seeking to protect national interests. Stich was denied the constitutional right to a jury trial and at the age of 67, sent to federal prison for six months, of which two months was in solitary confinement. Justice Department prosecutors sought to imprison him for two years for reporting the criminal activities that they themselves had covered up, making themselves guilty of obstruction of justice. While in prison, federal judges ordered the seizure and liquidation of Stich's $10 million in real estate assets (his life's possessions), without the legal and constitutional requirement of a hearing, notice of hearing, and legally-required cause. These were void orders under the Supreme Court's void order doctrine, and legal actions can be taken at any time to order the orders void and for a return of the assets (that today are valued at close to $20 million. When Stich filed objections to the seizure and liquidation, the objection was unlawfully unfiled, and federal judge Edward Jellen (Oakland, California) charged Stich with criminal contempt of court. Jellen denied Stich a jury trial and sent4enced Stich to another prison term. From 1987 to 1995, Stich was continually under criminal contempt of court charges and incarceration. These unlawful and unconstitutional orders, which were indirect tactics obstructing justice, converted Stich from a multi-millionaire to a state of poverty. Throughout these legal and judicial obstruction of justice tactics, in the aviation arena, fatal airline disasters continued to occur, and in the other areas affected by the widespread corruption, there were great human tragedies, and on 9/11, there were be a record-setting consequences to the corruption affecting the aviation arena. Throughout these many years, Supreme Court Justices were made aware of the crimes perpetrated by judges over whom them have supervisory responsibilities, and covered up and protected the misconduct that criminalized the federal courts. Other Internet Pages Relating To Misconduct by Supreme Court Justices Implications of documented pattern of misconduct by Supreme Court Justices. Involvement in obstruction of justice by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Complicity by Justice Anthony Kennedy in the obstruction of justice, which started while he was a judge in the federal courts at San Francisco. Lawsuit against Supreme Court Justices on basis of their cover-ups and obstruction of justice. Partial list of filings submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court relating to the obstruction of justice tactics by lawyers, California judges, and federal judges. Partial list of letters sent to Justices of the U.S.. Supreme Court over a period of years, making them aware of the underlying criminal activities and the obstruction of justice tactics by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities. Once the coverups and the consequences occurred, the decision was made to continue the judicial coverups, despite the consequences. Among the one-day consequences were the hijackings of four airliners on September 11, 2001, enabled by the misconduct in the government's aviation safety offices (and to a smaller extent, the government's intelligence gathering offices) that prevented the federal government from ordering the known and obvious preventative measures. Conduct Meeting the Criteria Of Federal Crimes The following criminal statutes state the actions that constitutes a federal crime: Refusal to report, or refusal to act, when knowledge exists of a federal crime. Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Becoming accomplices, guilty as the people perpetrating the underlying criminal activities. Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 and 3. Refusing to act when made aware of civil constitutional violations against a former federal agent and witness. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. Obstruction of justice statutes. Retaliation against a witness and former federal agent to block exposure of federal crimes. Criteria for being a conspiracy. Criteria for being a criminal racketeering enterprise (RICO) Are the Justices Enablers To 3,000 Deaths? Consider the following: Without addressing the other areas affected by the criminal activities that Stich and his group of former government agents sought to report, and addressing only the corruption that affected the aviation environment: IF the culture and corruption within the FAA did in fact exist (as overwhelming documentation shows), which included a history of blocking the implementation of procedures addressing the known safety problems, such as hijackings). It would explain why the known and obviously long overdue measures to prevent the hijackings of the four airliners on 9/11 were not taken. And the preventative measures to prevent airline hijackings did exist (and Stich made such recommendations). And the need for such preventative measures was obvious from years of airline hijackings, plus the knowledge that airline hijackings were planned by Middle East terrorists). And if federal judges did block Stich from making these reports. And if federal judges did charge Stich with criminal contempt of court for trying to make such reports. It becomes obvious that the long overdue preventatives measures were blocked by the judicial obstruction of justice and judicial retaliation, including the criminal contempt of court for attempting to report these federal offenses. It then becomes obvious that if a citizen had perpetrated a minute fraction of these offenses that he would be criminally prosecuted for complicity in events that led to the 9/11 hijackings and 3,000 deaths. If these federal judges and Justices are guilty of any complicity in these events, we also have the complicity of the dozens of members of Congress who knew not only about the underlying criminal activities, but also the criminal obstruction of justice and criminal retaliation against the former federal agent. And the others, in the media and elsewhere, who also knew! Sampling of Events Made Possible By Misconduct Known to Supreme Court Justices The following are some of the prior and continuing national events made possible by a hoard of enablers. The numerous people and groups meeting the definition of enablers have control of key segments of the government and news distribution, insuring that the public will never know. TWA Flight 800 Two unpublicized events made possible the downing of TWA Flight 800, as disclosed in the books, Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries, and Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, and the Mafia. These events are addressed in letters that were sent by former federal agent Rodney Stich, including the following: . These were the following: Most of the above catastrophic events occurred on the program for which FAA air carrier operations inspector Rodney Stich had been given the assignment to correct the conditions responsible for the worst series of airline disasters in the nation's history. Pictures of many other crashes are not shown. The continuation of the culture of corruption−and the continuation of the cover-ups−made many people and groups enablers of many subsequent airline disasters. The following aviation disasters occurred after forewarned information of the terrorist attacks were given to FBI agents by a mole inside a key al Qaeda cell: TWA Flight 800, departing a New York City airport was downed, shortly thereafter. Strong Suspicion of Terrorist Act. See the book, Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries. This link provides information on 100 surface-to-air missiles being made available to Middle East terrorists about one year before the downing of TWA Flight 800; the rejection of the missiles by FBI-CIA personnel, and the letters written by former federal agent Rodney Stich to members of Congress seeking to prevent the transfer of the missiles. No response−followed by the missile downing of TWA Flight 800. Followed by the need for the standard cover-up to protect high-level government personnel. Additional FBI Enablers To Downing of TWA Flight 800 In a recent book, Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, and the Mafia, details are given of how a Mafia soldier acted as a mole inside the al Qaeda cell headed by Ramzi Yousef, who directed the earlier bombing of the World Trade Center and had plans to simultaneously bomb 11 U.S. airliners departing Far East locations. The advance warnings were disregarded by high FBI-DOJ personnel who sacrificed the lives that would be lost so as to protect personnel in the Department of Justice. Very sensitive information, that would also play a role in ignoring the warnings of planned terrorist attacks on other U.S. targets. That cover-up enabled to occur approximately 4,000 deaths as the forewarned terrorist attacks occurred. See also: Sampling of letters reporting the relationship between FBI-DOJ cover-ups and successful terrorist attacks. The hijackings of U.S. airliners occurring on September 11, 2001.September 11, 2001 Forewarned Terrorist Attacks Details about the FBI-DOJ cover-ups and the contacts between the al Qaeda operative and Gregory Scarpa Jr. can be found in the book, Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, and the Mafia, available in print and e-book formats from amazon.com (and in Kimble) and other sources. The decades of preventable airline disasters and their enablers are described and documented in the book, Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries. More information on the enablers to those catastrophic events: 9/11 index. Information provided by a mole inside the al Qaeda cell headed by infamous Ramzi Yousef on the planned terrorist attack, information that was then "deep-sixth" by high-level FBI-DOJ personnel. Absence of preventative measures resulted in nearly 4,000 deaths. Comparative blame for 9/11 between Afghanistan, Iraq, and the documented conduct of enablers in the United States. 9/11 enablers. American Airlines Flight 587 (Strong indications of Terrorist Action) Forewarned Bombings of U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania List of Documentary Books On Endemic Corruption in the United States More information about these books by clicking here. Sampling of prior books reviews. Sampling of reader comments. American Victims Download DVD videos from amazon to rent or to buy, onto your Windows XP operation system computer. For more information, click here. To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link: Cell phone and service deal from amazon.com, with 30-day return if not satisfied. Help fund and continue our exposure efforts by ordering any product from amazon.com through our links. Return to: www.defraudingamerica.com www.unfriendlyskies.com www.druggingamerica.com www.defraudingamericablog.com www.transoceanairlines.com </body>