SEQUENCE OF EVENTS AGAINST STICH
TO HALT HIS EXPOSURE OF
CORRUPTION IN GOVERNMENT OFFICES
The following are highlights on the attempts to report high-level corruption in government and high-level corruption seeking to halt the reports by former federal agent Rodney Stich. More details are found in his various books, starting with Unfriendly Skies and then progressing into the other books he authored.
Stich used his vast assets ($10 million in real estate) to fund exposure of vast areas of corruption in the three branches of the federal government that he and his group of other former federal agents had discovered. (These agents were from the FBI, DEA, Customs, CIA, including former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial operations).
Somewhere in high government offices, a decision was made to use legal tactics to silence Stich by stripping him of the assets that funded his exposure activities. This scheme commenced with the filing of a sham lawsuit against Stich in the California courts at Fairfield, California. The lawsuit was filed by a CIA-front law firm in San Francisco, Friedman, Sloan and Ross. (Details of the lawsuit and involvement of California and federal judges are found in a lawsuit filed by Stich at a later date. (MS Word) (Adobe pdf)
That lawsuit was barred by over three dozen California statutes and rules of court, barred by California Supreme Court decisions, barred by federal statutes, barred by the U.S. Constitution, and barred by landmark Supreme Court decisions. Further, California statutes and rules of court specifically deprived the California courts of personal and subject matter jurisdiction. (MS Word) (Adobe pdf)
From that point on, the CIA-front law firm and every level of the California judiciary worked in unison to deprive Stich access to his funds, protect the massive violations of state and federal laws, and the repeatedly charged Stich with filing frivolous papers and being a vexatious litigant whenever he exercised the specific state remedies for the large numbers of violations. This conduct continued for six years in the California courts and implicated every level of the California court system.
Any single one of the repeated violations shown in orders rendered by California judges constituted violations of federal laws and constitutional protections, invoking federal court jurisdiction under the Civil Rights Act (Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983-1986), Title 28 U.S.C. § 1343, the Declaratory Judgment Act, and other law.
Stich exercised the first of multiple federal remedies in 1983 against the continuing pattern of attacks upon him by lawyers in unison with California judges, which then expanded into the federal courts, with federal judges greatly expanding on the violations and deprivation of every relevant due process right. Stich's exercise of federal remedies was probably unexpected, and required the involvement of federal judges, which then greatly escalated the documented pattern of judicially inflicted civil and constitutional violations to where it has now become a visible and documented scandal in the federal courts. This scandal combines the judicial attempts to block the exposure of major criminal activities implicating people in key government positions with the documented misuse of the federal courts to savagely destroy a former federal agent5 through unprecedented violations of large segments of federal protective laws and constitutional protections.
The federal filings sought an order under the Civil Rights Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act to halt the rendering of orders by California judges acting without personal and without subject matter jurisdiction as they violated dozens of state and federal laws. The Declaratory Judgment Act and related rules of court and case law required that federal judges address Stich's personal and property rights established 22 years earlier in five judgments that adjudicated the issues now being impermissibly raised in the California courts.
The California lawsuit was given a label that would not indicate to the non-legal observer to be an ordinary lawsuit. It was called a dissolution of marriage action, using a Duncanville, Texas, resident, Emma Stich, who claimed she wanted a termination of an existing marriage and that half of Stich's properties were community. That ordinary-sounding action was a sham in light of the fact that:
The parties had been divorced for almost twenty years following a bilateral consent divorce proceeding while residents of another state.
The Texas resident had repeatedly declared herself divorced in real estate and other legal transactions and the title of her home was as a divorced woman.
The Texas resident continued to declared herself--in Texas--a divorced woman while the CIA-front law firm was claiming in the California action that she wanted a termination of an alleged existing marriage.
The parties had not seen nor talked to each other in years.
The 1966 divorce judgment had been entered as a local judgment in the states of California, Nevada, Oklahoma, and Texas, each of which must be recognized under the laws of California and the other states and under federal laws and the U.S. Constitution.
The CIA law firm and lawyers used her as a catalyst in the California action as a vehicle to destroy Stich's assets. If the CIA-front lawyers actually represented a woman that was legally married to Stich, and that half of his assets were hers, they would not have allowed properties to be lost due to their filing of lis pendens which prevented mortgages from being rolled over. Valuable properties were being lost.
Federal judges refused to perform their duty, refused to address the massive civil and constitutional violations, refused to issue an order declaring the validity of the five judgments. Instead, federal judges aided and abetted the violations of the very laws that the judges were paid and entrusted to enforce.
During this process, Stich continued to receive information and documentation on other areas of criminal activities from an increasing number of present and former government agents. Complying with and using the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, plaintiff included a demand with his federal filings, which continued to seek relief from the escalating violations of federal and state law, to report to a federal judge the information and evidence of the criminal activities.
Federal judges, who had blocked previous attempts to report criminal activities in the government's aviation safety offices, then blocked the reporting of these other criminal activities. They reacted by:
Refusing to receive the evidence of criminal activities which they were required to receive as part of their mandatory administrative duties and as required by the federal crime reporting statute.
They issued unlawful and unconstitutional orders barring Stich for the remainder of his life access to the federal courts. These orders simultaneously blocked him from reporting the criminal activities that were continuing to inflict great harm upon national security and other major national interests, and terminated for him the rights, protections, and defenses guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States.
When Stich later learned of other criminal activities from the increasing numbers of CIA, FBI, DEA and other government agents, he again sought to report the criminal activities to a federal judges under the federal crime reporting statute.
Federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors charged Stich with criminal contempt of court, denied him a jury trial, and sentenced him to federal prison for six months. From 1987 to 1995, Stich was either under house arrest or in federal prison as a result of his attempts to report these criminal activities and for exercising federal defenses against the parallel legal activities to silence him.
While in prison, nearing the age of 70, federal judges issued orders, without the required notice, without a hearing, and without cause, Las Vegas federal judge Robert Jones ordered the seizure and liquidation of Stich's life assets, converting him from a multi-millionaire to a state of poverty. His home was seized and he was homeless for a period of time.
After seizing the assets, Oakland federal judge Edward Jellen issued orders barring Stich from filing objections to the seizure and liquidation of his assets. When Stich did file an objection--which was then unfiled--Jellen charged Stich with criminal contempt of court and against sentenced him to federal prison.
Through the entire 30 years of felony coverups and fraudulent seizure of Stich's assets, large numbers of district and appellate judges protected the corrupt acts, as did the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. To get a better understanding of the Butterfly Effect of such judicial corruption, these actions were taken to block Stich's reporting of the type of criminal activities in government that enabled four groups of hijackers to kill 3,000 people on 9-11.
Further details on this sequence are found in Stich's Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America print or e-book formats.
There is much more, and the details are found on other pages to this web site. There is sufficient documented evidence of repeated hard-core corruption by federal judges to serve as a platform for criminal prosecution, impeachment, and other long-overdue matters in the courts.
Related Web Sites
- Chronology of decades of corrupt activities by the CIA, U.S. politicians, and other members of the system, as described in the book, Defrauding America.
- Chronology of the arrogant and corrupt war on drugs--against the American people--as described in the book, Drugging America.
- Chronology of arrogant and corrupt activities in the deadly politics of aviation safety, as described in the book, Unfriendly Skies.
- Chronology of covert and corrupt activities in which the American people suffered the consequences of blowback, as described in the e-book, Blowback, 9/11, Iraq, Lies, and Coverups.
- Story of a CIA operation based in Honolulu and its titular head, who was made a scapegoat by CIA and Justice Department personnel and a federal judge, after its cover was blown, and as described in the e-book, Disavow.
Informational print and e-books books describing these matters can be ordered by clicking here.
Help fund our exposure activities by placing orders for any amazon.com products through our links. There are no extra charges involved.
New Page 1