Highlights in the sequences of corruption identified in government operations.

<body> The Start of Discovering Corruption Related to Multiple Airline Disasters, and the Start of RICO Violations Quick Thumbnail Overview A quick thumbnail overview of the RICO violations that involved lawyers, law firms, California and federal judges, perpetrating parallel multiple legal schemes to block the reporting of deadly criminal activities, and retaliation for attempting to make such reports: Retaliation while a federal aviation safety agent seeking to report corrupt and criminal activities related to several recent airline disasters. The results of the deep-seated corruption and retaliation was a continuation of airline disasters and deaths. Initial legal scheme carried out by the CIA front San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross and their lawyers. The result was massive personal harm and huge financial losses. The intent of the plot was to strip the former federal agent, Rodney Stich, of the assets that they knew funded his exposure activities. California judges joined the scheme, issuing unlawful and unconstitutional orders, without jurisdiction, violating blocks of California and federal laws and constitutional protections, during a six year period that caused millions of dollars in damages. Federal judges repeatedly blocked the former federal agent from reporting the criminal activities that he and a group of other former government agents had discovered during their official duties. Their actions as part of a RICO scheme resulted in great harm in the areas affected by the misconduct. In the aviation arena, the harm was continuing the linked airline disastersincluding continuation of the 50 years of airline hijackings that were easily prevented. Federal judges issued a series of unlawful and unconstitutional orders permanently barring, solely for Stich, the legal and constitutional right to access federal courts for federal issues. Reporting criminal acts to a federal judge was one of the issues that they blocked, thereby violating the federal crime reporting statute. Their actions constituted criminal acts under obstruction of justice statutes. As the former federal agent sought to report additional areas of corruption that he was discovered from other former government agents, Department of Justice lawyers and federal judges charged him with criminal contempt of court, denied him a jury trial, and sentenced him to six months in federal prison. These were federal crimes for retaliating against a former federal agent, witness, and informant. While in prison, federal judges, federal trustees, and the CIA-front law firm, seized and liquidated Stich's $10 in assets, knowing that these were the assets that funded his exposure of the deadly corruption he sought to report. The seizure orders were void orders under Supreme Court decisions, on that basis that they were ordered without a hearing, without a notice of hearing, and without legal cause. Stripped of his assets, homeless for a period of time, other lawyers joined the scheme, including the South Carolina law firm of Smith and Collins. More of the Details Rodney Stich, a former federal air safety agent was asked to accept the assignment to correct the conditions resulting in the worst series of air disasters in the nation's history. In this position he discovered deep-seated misconduct that caused or made possible a series of continuing airline crashes, including years of hijackings, all of which could have been easily prevented. These corrupt conditions prevented the federal government from meeting its air safety responsibilities and were responsible for hundreds of deaths. Included in the number of airline crashes that prompted government officials to ask Stich to take over the program was a crash into New York City that was the world's worst at that time (based upon the number of people killed). That crash occurred within one mile of where the World Trade Center would be later built. The conditions that Stich discovered, which had been discovered by earlier federal air safety inspectors who found themselves powerless to function in their air safety positions, included warnings not to make reports of air safety problems or violations, destruction of official reports made by inspectors, harassment and threats against inspectors who made the reports or who attempted to take corrective actions. Acting As Independent Prosecutor The continuation of fatal airline crashes and the continuation of the arrogance and corruption that bred these disasters caused Stich to take actions that were never before taken. He exercised the law in a creative manner and took on the position of an independent prosecutor, conducting hearings that last for four months, and included taking sworn testimony during the hearing of key FAA officials. The 4,000 page hearing transcript proved Stich's charges that major misconduct within the FAA was responsible for an ongoing series of fatal airline crashes. The result of that hearing was further cover-ups by the FAA, the NTSB, members of Congress, and others. Circumventing DOJ Block, Appearing Before Federal Grand Jury Stich circumvented the block by Justice Department personnel and appeared before a federal grand jury in Denver. The mechanics of how a grand jury functions, controlled by the U.S. attorney, prevented an investigation. Stich refused to work under these conditions and left the FAA. This change was made possible by the fact that Stich had acquired a considerable quantity of real estate while an airline captain prior to working for the Federal Aviation Administration. Publishing Books and Appearing on Radio-TV The crashes continued to occur from the FAA misconduct, causing Stich to become an activist against corruption related to aviation matters. He published books, appeared on hundreds of radio and television shows, and gave speeches, in an attempt to inform the public of these matters and in anticipation that there would be a sufficient number of people outraged and with sufficient courage to help bring about changes. The first book that he wrote was the first of several editions of Unfriendly Skies. That book is now in its fourth edition and called, Unfriendly Skies: 20th and 21st Centuries. Filing Federal Lawsuits Stich also filed federal lawsuits against the FAA to report criminal activities to a federal court under the federal crime reporting statute (18 U.S.C. § 4), and under the statute (28 U.S.C. § 1361) providing any citizen the right to seek a court order to force public officials to perform a legal duty. He also filed a federal lawsuit against the NTSB to seek a court order requiring the political board members to receive material evidence related to several airline crashes that they were covering up. The clear wording of Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 states that federal judges (or any other federal officer) must receive the information and evidence of federal crimes being offered to them, as part of their administrative duties (not judicial decision making authority). Instead of receiving the information, federal district and appellate judges in the Ninth Circuit courts blocked Stich from providing this information and evidence of crimes against the United States that involved people in key government positions. In the first action against the FAA, district and appellate judges admitted in the record that these were serious charges but that receiving this information was a function of Congress and not the courts. The clear wording of the crime reporting statute shows that federal judges do have this responsibility. Further responsibility arose under Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361 in which Stich sought a federal court order forcing FAA officials to perform their legal duty and halt their unlawful conduct. Justice Department lawyers filed objections to the introduction of this evidence and moved to have the lawsuits dismissed. The lawsuits were dismissed, and Stich filed appeals and then petitions to the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, who also had the responsibility under the crime reporting statute to receive the evidence of the criminal activities. They also refused. The refusal to perform their duties under the federal crime reporting statute caused the internal FAA misconduct to continue, which was followed by even worse airline crashes due to problems that the FAA should have corrected. Stich then published the second edition of Unfriendly Skies, which named the federal judges and Supreme Court justices, members of Congress, as holding blame in the subsequent crashes and deaths. This book and Stich's continuing appearances on radio and television threatened to expose many people in key government positions with the criminal misconduct, crashes, and deaths. United Airlines was also threatened with exposure since much of the misconduct was by management personnel of the airline. Discovering Other Areas of Criminal Activities In Government Stich's books and frequent radio and television appearances caused other government agents to contact him, providing him with information and documentation on criminal activities in other areas of government operations. The federal crime reporting statute required that Stich, or any other person who knows of a federal crime, to promptly report it to a federal judge (or other federal officer). Since Justice Department personnel and members of Congress had repeatedly refused to receive the evidence, Stich again exercised his right and his responsibility to report the crimes to a federal court, which he started to do in 1986. Voiding Civil and Constitutional Rights and Protections As Part of Obstruction of Justice Tactics Again, federal judges refused to receive the evidence. They then compounded this crime by issuing unlawful and unconstitutional orders barring Stich, for the remainder of his life, from filing any papers in the federal courts. Refusing to receive evidence of criminal activities, obstructing justice, were federal crimes under Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 3, and 4. These injunctive orders were void on the basis that they violated each of the four legal requirements for such orders and were unlawful and unconstitutional by depriving Stich of the legal rights, legal protections and legal defenses guaranteed to all citizens. Further, their result, and surely their intent, was to obstruct justice. The Injunctive orders blocked the reporting of criminal activities and were therefore criminal in intent and consequences. As Stich received additional information on additional criminal activities, he again filed papers in the Ninth Circuit federal courts at San Francisco and Sacramento, seeking to report these crimes, which even included subversive activities. Justice Department lawyers and federal judges then charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for violating the orders that terminated Stich's right to federal court access. He was denied a jury trial, and the same group that was criminally implicated in the criminal activities through their cover-ups then sentenced Stich to federal prison for six months. He was 69 years of age at that time and had just undergone six-coronary bypass open heart surgery. During this imprisonment he was put in solitary confinement for eight weeks. It is a criminal offense to inflict harm upon a former federal agent or witness for seeking to report criminal activities. Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1505, 1510, 1512, 1513. Parallel Legal-Judicial Schemes To Block Exposing High-Level Corruption Simultaneous with federal judges and Justice Department personnel blocking the reporting of these criminal and subversive activities, the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross in San Francisco filed a sham lawsuit against Stich in the courts at Fairfield, California, focusing on the $10 million in real estate assets that funded Stich's exposure activities. the lawsuit sought to immediately deprive Stich access to these funds while acting to destroy the assets. In law, there are two ways to immediately place a person's assets in control of a judge. Either through probate or in a divorce action in a community property state where the court holds that the property is community. Stich wasn't dead so the probate route was out. Stich had been legally divorced for the prior 20 years and that route should have been out. No problem; when you have control of judges and have a powerful source high in government supporting your unlawful conduct, the victim has no defenses. The CIA-front law firm filed a divorce action against Stich, claiming that their client in Duncanville, Texas wanted to terminate the marriage and was claiming most of Stich's personal and corporate assets. That lawsuit was barred by dozens of state and federal laws and constitutional protections. Included in the obstacles to that lawsuit was the fact that the parties had been legally divorced for over 20 years, as established by a January 31, 1966 divorce judgment that had been entered as a local judgment in the states of Oklahoma, Texas, Nevada, and California. Both parties had been declaring themselves divorced throughout this period in real estate and other legal transactions. The parties' divorced status was recognized in over 100 title insurance policies. In addition, the Texas resident continued to declare herself divorced in her resident state of Texas while the CIA-front law firm was claiming she was married and wanted to terminate that marriage. By placing lis pendens on all of Stich's properties and refusing to allow mortgages to be rolled over when they came due, valuable properties were lost. If the CIA-front law firm was actually representing a marriage partner in Texas, they would be guilty of malpractice for allowing valuable assets to be lost. For six years, over a dozen California judges granted every motion requested by the CIA-front law firm, refused every motion filed by Stich, and continued to violate record-numbers of state and federal laws barring them from the actions they were taking. It became apparent that they did not fear the consequences of their blatantly unlawful and unconstitutional conduct that violated numerous federally protected rights for which there were remedies in federal courts. It became a standard practice of California judges to label every exercise of due process defense remedies a frivolous act, and then ordered Stich to pay huge financial sanctions for exercising these defenses. It is a criminal offense to inflict harm upon a person for exercising constitutional due process rights. Exercising Defense Remedies In Federal Courts: More Corruption Stich filed the first of numerous papers in federal court seeking to halt the personal and financial losses arising from the massive violations of state and federal laws. This right was provided by the laws and Constitution of the United States including: Declaratory Judgment Act (Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202) FRCivP 57, and related law. Federal law requires that this federal cause of action receive court priority. Civil Rights Act (Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983-1986), for violations of state and federal laws and constitutional rights under color of state law. Despite the bar against dismissal when the facts stated in the complaint state a federal cause of action for which federal relief is available, every federal judge promptly dismissed the lawsuits, thereby protecting the CIA-front law firm and the heavy involvement of California judges, aided and abetted the violations of federally protected rights for which federal judges had a responsibility to prevent. Federal judges were now combining their obstruction of justice with a blatantly sham lawsuit filed by a CIA-front law firm to halt Stich's exposure activities through taking of his assets. Seeking Relief in Chapter 11 Courts From Civil Rights Violations Denied all due process defenses in California and federal courts, and continuing to lose valuable real estate as loans became due that could not be refinanced, Stich filed Chapter 11 for his personal and corporate assets seeking to force a federal judge to address the massive violations of state and federal laws. He sought to have the Chapter 11 judge order the removal of the lis pendens placed on the properties by the CIA-front law firm and their lawyers. Also, to have an order rendered halting the sham lawsuit in the California courts and declare the validity of the five judgment that had already adjudicated the issues 22 years earlier (the divorce). Discovering Nationwide Corruption In Federal Bankruptcy Courts At that time Stich did not know the existence of the massive corruption in the nation's bankruptcy courts involving corrupt judges, Justice Department trustees, court-appoint trustees, lawyers, and law firms--and CIA involvement. He was to learn these matters at a later date, as detailed in the third editions of Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America. Instead of performing his duty, Chapter 11 judge Robert Jones (Las Vegas) protected the CIA-front law firm. He signed orders in chambers seizing and liquidating Stich's $10 million in assets, violating the legal and constitutional due process requirement of a hearing, notice of hearing at which Stich could defend, and legally recognized cause. These due process violations were then followed by Chapter 11 Judge Edward Jellen (Oakland, California) issuing unlawful and unconstitutional orders barring Stich from filing any objections to the seizure and liquidation of his assets. When Stich did file an objection, the objection was unfiled and Jellen charged him with criminal contempt of court (for filing objections when this due process right had been terminated by his earlier unlawful order). Eventually, all of Stich's assets were gone, including his home and his sole source of income. A heavy price to pay for his efforts to protect a public that appears totally unwilling to exercise any form of outrage or courage to fight cancer-spreading corruption in government. From the very first attempt to report the criminal activities to a federal court in 1977, and throughout the period until 2002, justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, who held supervisory responsibilities over the same federal judges guilty of these crimes, refused to act. In this way, these justices aided and abetted the criminal acts that subverted major national interests, including national security, and were complicit in the various forms of harm inflicted upon the American people. The 3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001, were made possible by the corruption in the FAA that resulted in the conditions insuring the success of four groups of hijackers, and the cover-ups by federal judges and others. From 1986 to 1995, Stich was continually under either house arrest or in prison for having sought to report the criminal and subversive activities to a federal court or for exercising defense remedies against the taking of his life assets (that had funded his exposure of crimes against the United States). What is stated here is only the tip of the iceberg. Much more information is on this Internet site and in the books that Stich and his group of government agents have written. Unprecedented Information and Evidence Of Widespread Corruption in Government In no other known case is there so much documented evidence of hardcore judicial corruption affecting national issues, and complicit in great harm to major national interests, and complicit in the deaths of many people. The many groups protesting judicial corruption will get nowhere relying solely on the misconduct of judges on individual matters. The only way that major changes can be made to remove arrogant and corrupt judges is to heavily publicize this information, and that which is found in the books, Unfriendly Skies, Defrauding America, Drugging America, Terrorism Against America, and Legal and Judicial Trojan Horses. Stich is now in his 80s, and has for 40 years fought the battle by himself. He is about to abandon future efforts. If the public is too lazy, hasn't the backbone or integrity to act, even after 3,000 deaths in only one day's deja vu consequence of the corruption Stich and his group of other government agents have presented to the public, then the public has decided it wants more of the same (just as they have decided for many prior years and many prior tragedies, including those outside of the aviation area). Many Continuous Years of Complicity by Lawyers and Law FirmsSome with CIA Connections Years of continuous complicity by lawyers and law firmssome with CIA connections, have been parallel efforts to halt the efforts by a former federal agent from reporting and exposing the corruption in certain government offices. By their documented acts of deception, massive civil rights and RICO violations, attention was diverted from these federal crimes, enabling to continue the corruption that had tragic, sometimes catastrophic, and sometimes deadly consequences. In one area, the ripple effects were felt on September 11, 2001. Parallel Obstruction of Justice by Federal Judges The same federal judges who blocked the reporting of the criminal activities, and were implicated in the resulting deaths, then repeatedly violated every protections that they were paid and entrusted to provide. Their actions protected the scheme, protected the CIA-front law firm and lawyers, and protected the California judges who became part of the scheme. Without going into detail on this page, for those who are interested in these details, they are described in a lawsuit filed in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) That lawsuit raised several issues, including: Seeking to report the corrupt activities in the FAA, FBI, and CIA that would shortly thereafter be the areas of primary and secondary blame for the conditions that enabled four groups of Middle East personnel to hijack four airliners on September 11, 2001. These areas have been meticulously avoided in congressional hearings and by the 9/11 Commission personnel. At this stage Stich had acquired considerable more information on corruption in various government offices, partly from years of information that he received from agents of then FBI, CIA, DEA, ONI, Customs, FAA; former drug smugglers carrying out drug smuggling operations for CIA agents and during the Contra operation; and former Mafia figures, including Gregory Scarpa, Jr. At this stage, federal judges were so heavily implicated that they blocked the lawsuit from proceeding. During the proceedings, the 9/11 hijackings occurred. Stich then filed into that lawsuit a declaration showing the relationship of the lawyers and judges in multiple legal schemes to block the reporting of the tragedy-related corruption. Orders seeking to halt the massive civil and constitutional violations perpetrated by the CIA-front law firm and lawyers, California judges acting in unison with them, and the federal judges who aided and abetted the scheme. Damages against the lawyers and others who participated in the parallel schemes to block the exposure of the criminal activities that had such tragic consequences. Before U.S. District Judge Edward Reed stopped the action, thereby covering up for the corruption and the participants, the 9/11 hijackings occurred. Since the hijackings were made possible by the corruption Stich sought to report, and the various roles played in the cover-up of such corruption by each of the lawyers, law firms, and judges that Stich named in the lawsuit, Stich filed a declaration into that action. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Without going in the many other details, federal judges and the CIA-front law firm seized Stich's assets, violating the requirement of a hearing, notice of hearing, and legally required cause. From 1987 to 1997, they stripped Stich of his life's assets, converting him from a multi-millionaire to a state of poverty. Today, in his eighties, he lives on his modest Social Security payments. Last Lawsuit Prior to 9/11, Seeking to Report the Corruption, And the Lawyers and Judges Making 9/11 Possible The former federal agent filed a lawsuit, prior to 9/11, in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada, seeking to report the corrupt activities that he and a group of other government agents had discovered. Also, the action named as defendants, lawyers and judges who were covering up for the crimes and engaging in multiple parallel legal schemes to inflict great personal and financial harm upon him. Among the various federal claims were that that fell under the RICO act for a series of predicate acts to obstruct justice and inflict great harm. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) More details on this lawsuit at other pages on this site. During the attempt to provide these reports, the events of 9/11 occurred. A declaration was filed in that lawsuit related to the blame for 9/11, emphasizing the need for the judge to receive reports of the criminal activities (that he had been blocking). (MS Word) (Adobe pdf) That declaration was ignored by federal judge Edward Reed at Reno and the Ninth Circuit court of appeals judges. Federal Lawsuit Filed After 9/11 in NYC, Seeking to Report the Corrupt Activities That Enabled 9/11 to Occur Stich made one last effort to report the corrupt activities and the felony cover-ups that made 9/11 possible. He filed a lawsuit submitted on August 15, 2002, for filing in the U.S. district court for the Southern District of New York by former federal agent Rodney Stich. The purpose of the lawsuit was to report and expose the corrupt activities that created the conditions enabling hijackers to seize four airliners, and the misconduct adversely affecting major national issues, including national security. That lawsuit also addressed the massive civil rights violations that were part of the parallel efforts to block the reports of these crimes against the United States. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Further information on that lawsuit can be found at another page. Sham Lawsuit against Former Federal Agent by South Carolina Law Firm with CIA-Connections After Stich filed his latest lawsuit that threatened to expose the entire pattern of judicial and legal fraternity corruption, various tactics were commenced to again halt his activities. One of these legal fraternity stunts was the filing of a lawsuit against Stich by the Charleston, South Carolina, law firm of Smith and Collins, and their attorneys, David Athell Collins and Steven L. Smith. Although the lawsuit was directed at Stich and the publishing company, people who would be harmed by it would be those who are victimized by the corruption Stich seeks to publicize through his book publishing. That includes the victims of fraud related to air safety; the victims of the arrogant and corrupt was on drugs; the victim of the bankruptcy court fraud; and the victims of the many other criminal activities implicating people in key government positions, federal and California judges, and many others. That same lawyer and law firm several years later filed a lawsuit seeking to discredit CBS 60-Minute exposure of President George Bush II Texas Air National Guard record, further suggesting links to government sources. The allegations in the lawsuit were immediately disproved by the facts to which they referred. By filing the lawsuit in a state court where judicial corruption is even worse than in federal courts, and where one-time state judges act to reward certain legal friends, the chances of Stich prevailing were virtually nil. The law firm knew that Stich had no assets to pay for legal counsel 3,000 miles away, before a judge who is often in the pocket of certain law firms and attorneys. They knew that the publishing company had no assets other than the books, and that it was literally a non-profit operation. Their goal apparently was to obtain a default judgment and then seize control of the books and the name of the books. This scheme would protect the California and federal judges, the legal fraternity whose involvement in the corruption goes back 40 years, as stated in each of Stich's books, would protect Justice Department personnel, members of Congress, and the corruption at United Airlines that caused such brutal consequences for the victim of its fraud. No Basis for Jurisdiction in South Carolina Court Stich had no connection to the State of South Carolina. Neither did Diablo Western Press. It had no office there and solicited no business there. A Attorney David Athell Collins first contacted Stich through a June 8, 2000 letter, falsely stating: "Stich makes certain accusations against my client. Essentially, Mr. Stich has accused my client of killing his ex-wife and that the murder was covered up." The book, Defrauding America, clearly did not make any such statement or insinuation. (However, the information provided by the Army medical doctor to Stich suggests such a possibility, but this was not addressed in the book, and the focus of that section was on the DOJ retaliation against the media doctor for his Army reserve unit refusing to provide helicopter involvement in the Ruby Ridge siege and murders. Stich responded with a June 29, 2000 letter, making it clear that no such charge was made by the clear wording in the book. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Another South Carolina law firm involved was Horger, Horger, Lanier & Knight, and Troy Guerard Knight, of Sommerville, South Carolina. The number of lawyers involved in the scheme far exceeded any money they could obtain from Stich, who had already been stripped of his assets and survived on modest Social Security payments. The intent was to seize the books and thereby end Stich's ability to expose the corruption that by then implicated many groups in many related tragedies. Disregarding the absence of jurisdiction over a California resident, the South Carolina judge, Jackson V. Gregory, rendered a $3 million default judgment against Stich and Diablo Western Press. That South Carolina law firm then paid California lawyers to file an action in the California courts to enter the South Carolina default judgment as a local California judgment, and then seize the books exposing the corruption in government offices. Eventually over a dozen lawyers became involved in the actions against the former federal agent, even though they knew that prior legal schemes had stripped him of all assets and that he was literally judgment-proof as a result. They then Although Collins knew that federal judges had seized all of Stich's assets and that he had none to seize, tens of thousands of dollars in legal fees were spent to continue the action, solely to seize the books that would have no value to them. The California lawyers were Irwin J. Eskanos and Barry Adler of Concord, California. The same California judicial system that had played key roles against Stich in unison with a CIA-front law firm, then refused to recognize California law that barred the filing, including Stich's protection under the SLAPP doctrine. That doctrine provides defense against lawsuits seeking to retaliate against people exposing corruption, including corruption in government offices. In this case, the 3,000 deaths on 9/11 were only one-day's consequences of the corruption. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Among the defenses Stich filed, under California law, was a defense against the default judgment from South Carolina being entered as a local judgment in California. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Initial defense in California courts at Martinez, California. April 14, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Reply to the deceptive brief filed by the Eskanos and Adler law firm. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) A description of the legal scheme is found in a lawsuit filed in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada. March 28, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Facts Surfaced In Legal Newspaper Article That the Law Firm Had Close CIA or Other Government Ties The facts strongly indicate that Collins and his law firm were acting for unknown sources in government, not only against Stich, but against those who were exposing President George Bush's delinquent air national guard record. Similar acts were done to discredit Operation Tailwind. Lawyers Involved in RICO Crimes With Judges: One Day's Consequences on 9/113,000 Dead One of the most unrecognized causes of most of the nation's prior tragedies is the ripple effect, sometimes called the "butterfly effect." For simplicity, let's look at the events of 9/11 and the 3,000 people who were horribly killed, and look at the many people who hold a complicity role in those events: The people with the legal responsibility for preventing airliners from being hijacked are the people in the government's aviation safety offices: the FAA. This area has been carefully avoided during congressional hearings and by the 9/11 Commission members. This is one of the key areas of FAA corruption that Stich sought to report, for which lawyers and judges joined together to halt Stich's exposure actions and to retaliate against him for attempting to make such reports. All of them committed criminal acts that were involved in thousands of deaths, in only one of the affected areas! Secondary responsibilities for the 9/11 hijackings were with the FBI-DOJ and CIA. Although the 9/11 Commission blamed them for neglect, they covered up for the criminal culture in these two groups. It was the corrupt culture in the FBI-DOJ that blocked individual agents from completing their investigations of the terrorists. It was the corrupt CIA culture that devoted more time to their corrupt actions that were crimes against the United States than they spent in trying to find intelligence relating to the scheme to hijack U.S. airliners. Pasadena Lawyer John Guerrini Joined the Scheme On July 20, 2006, Pasadena lawyer John Guerrini took over to exert efforts to halt Stich's exposure of the corruption that included that which made 9/11 possible. How he would proceed was to be seen, as: Stich had no assets. He had no income other than Social Security. The books that were part of Diablo Western Press were no longer in the possession of Diablo Western Press. Prior to Guerrini joining the "enterprise," another attorney, Mark Wray of Reno, was asked to take over the collection of the judgment. During a telephone conversation on August 8, 2003, Wray advised Stich he would have nothing to do with the action. Statute of Limitations Has Not Passed for 9/11 Litigants To Sue the Lawyers and Law Firms Whose Documented Acts Delayed Reporting 9/11-Related Corruption The involvement of the Pasadena, California lawyer keeps the continuity of the RICO predicate acts going, tolling the statute of limitations for victims and families of 9/11 to file lawsuits against the lawyers and law firms that are implicated. Keep posted for the latest in the continuing schemes by lawyers and law firms, and the continuing tragic consequences. Who Among the Many That Are Implicated Will Prosecute? The facts of the legal and judicial schemes to block the reporting of criminal activities in government offices, including the great harm inflicted upon the former federal agent, meets the definition of a RICO enterprise. But to take action, a dedicated and patriotic and influential law firm would have to come forward and use the massive amount of documented evidence. RETURN TO TOP </body>