New Page 1

<body> <p><HTML></p> <p><HEAD></p> <p><TITLE>Documented corruption in government offices before and after the 9/11 terrorist hijackings.</TITLE></p> <p><META NAME="keywords" CONTENT=" XXXXXXXXXXXX "></p> <p><NOFRAMES></p> <p><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffff"></p> <head> <blockquote> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000"><b><font size="4">CORRUPTION BEFORE, AND AFTER, SEPTEMBER 11, 2001</font></b></font><font size="4"></head><body></font></p> <blockquote> <p><b><u><font size="4">The deep-seated arrogance and corruption in key segments of the government's aviation safety offices</font></u><font size="4"> created the conditions that blocked the federal government from putting in place the known preventative measures to halt hijackers from seizing aircraft.</font></b></p> <p><b><font size="4">The <u>various forms of cover-ups</u> insured that these deadly conditions would continue, as they had for many years.</font></b></p> <p><b><font size="4">The <u>blocks to reporting these federal crimes by federal judges</u> protected those implicated in the underlying criminal activities, protected those involved in the coverups, and insured the continuation of the history of deadly consequences. In addition, federal judges misused their courts as a racketeering enterprise to inflict great personal and financial harm upon former government agent Rodney Stich in dual efforts to block the exposure of these criminal and subversive activities. </font></b></p><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4"><b> <a name="Judicial Corruption Before the 3,000 Deaths">JUDICIAL CORRUPTION BEFORE THE SEPTEMBER 11, 2001</a></b></font></p> <p><b> <font size="4">The <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/faa_ntsb_lawsuits.html">first attempts to report these corrupt activities</a> involved in a number of airline disasters, being reported under the <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/crime_reporting_statute.html">federal crime reporting statute</a>, occurred in the late 1970s and early 1980s. </font></b> </p> <p><b><font size="4">The latest attempt, prior to the events of September 11, was a <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_reno.html">lawsuit filed in Reno, Nevada</a>, seeking to report the criminal activities that would be implicated in the events of September 11, 2001. <br><br>The federal judge repeated what federal judges had done before him: refused to receive the evidence, denied Stich federal defenses against the massive violations of federally protected rights that were implicated in the sham lawsuits seeking to silence him, and ordered Stich to pay financial sanctions for filing the lawsuit. All of these judicial acts were done in violation of major criminal and civil due process statutes.</font></b></p> <hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4"><u><b> <a name="Exercising a Citizens Mandatory Responsibility and Rights">EXERCISING A CITIZEN'S MANDATORY RESPONSIBILITY AND RIGHTS</a></b></u></font></p> <p><b><font size="4">All Citizens Have Two Major Responsibilities When Aware of Corruption in Government Offices. One responsibility falls under the federal crime reporting statute:</font></b></p> <blockquote> <p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><b><font size="4">Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.</font></b></span></p> </blockquote> <p><b><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><font size="4">Another federal statute that gives any citizen the <i>right</i> to file a lawsuit in the federal courts to obtain a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful acts is Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. A responsible citizen had a responsibility to report criminal activities using this statute:</font></span></b></p> <p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman; letter-spacing: -.15pt"> <b><font size="4">Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.</font></b></span></p><hr> <h3 align="center"><font color="#FF0000"> <a name="Lawsuits Threat to Those Corrupting the System"><b>LAWSUIT'S THREAT TO THOSE CORRUPTING THE SYSTEM</b> </a></font></h3> <p><b><font size="4">There is a great danger to those in control of key government offices--the system--if citizens are allowed to circumvent the frequent coverups by people in the Department of Justice and are allowed to report the crimes to a federal court. This reporting, mandatory under the federal crime reporting statute, makes a record of the criminal activities--such as CIA involvement in drug trafficking to name only one of many criminal activities that could be reported. For that reason alone, it was important to destroy Stich's ability to succeed in that approach.</font></b></p><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4"><b> <a name="Judicial Obstruction of Justice After 3,000 Deaths">JUDICIAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE <i>AFTER</i> 3,000 DEATHS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001</a></b></font></p> <p></p> <p><b><font size="4">Two lawsuits were submitted for filing to the federal courts after September 11, 2001, seeking to report the criminal activities that created the conditions enabling the 19 hijackers to seize four airlines. These lawsuits were filed in part to report the criminal activities that were discovered by Rodney Stich, a former key federal aviation safety agent, and by his group of other former and present government agents. The primary authority for reporting federal crimes to a federal judges was the clear wording of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. </font><font size="4" face="Times New Roman">§ 4. Federal judges must receive the information and evidence as part of his or her administrative duties. </font></b> </p> <p align="center"><u><b> <font face="Times New Roman" color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Obstruction of Justice in Washington, DC Courts">OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN WASHINGTON, D.C. COURTS</a></font></b></u></p> <p><b> <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_dca_may2002.doc"> <font size="4">One lawsuit</font></a><font size="4"> was filed in the U.S. district court at Washington, D.C., where one of the hijacked planes had crashed. In clear violation of the federal crime reporting statute, Judge Henry Kennedy, Jr., continued the long line of federal judges blocking the reporting of criminal activities that had been inflicting great harm upon the United States and its people; he dismissed the filing shortly after it was filed and before any other papers could be filed.   </font></b></b></p> <p><b><font size="4">The dismissal sought support in the 1991 order by Judge Stanley Sporkin permanently terminating Stich's legal and constitutional right to file papers in federal courts. Stich filed a timely notice of appeal of this dismissal and appellate judges Ginsburg, Sentelle and Randolph promptly issued an order dismissing the appeal before the appeal brief could be filed. They claimed that Stich lost his legal and constitutional right to appeal remedies and his right to file any papers in any federal court. They also had the legal responsibility to receive reports of criminal activities, and their blocking the reporting of these crimes caused them to be guilty of criminal obstruction of justice that made them guilty as the perpetrators. Their acts, as with the acts of prior federal judges blocking these reports, would enable the continuation of the criminal activities and the harm upon the United States and its people.<br> </font></b></p> <p> <b><font size="4">Stich then filed a timely notice of appeal (January 27, 2003) and paid the filing fees. Federal due process laws require that the three-judge appellate panel receive Stich's appeal briefs and render a decision in accordance with law. Also, these appellate judges had the same responsibilities to receive reports of criminal activities under the mandatory requirements of 18 U.S.C. <font face="Times New Roman">§ 4. Instead, they </font>blocked the appeal process and blocked Stich from reporting these crimes by dismissing the appeal before any appeal briefs could be filed. <br> </font></b></p> <p><b><font size="4">Stich filed (January 27, 2003) a petition for en banc rehearing by the entire appellate court in the District of Columbia.</li> It is expected that, because of the great severity of the criminal obstruction of justice and the awesome consequences on a single morning, not counting the many other consequences, that every judge in the District of Columbia will continue the cover-up and refuse to act. </font></b></p> <hr> <p align="center"><b><font color="#FF0000"> <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_nyc_august82002.doc" name="Obstruction of Justice in New York City courts"> <font size="4" color="#FF0000">OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN NEW YORK CITY COURTS</font></a></font><a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_nyc_august82002.doc" name="Obstruction of Justice in New York City courts"><font size="4" color="#FF0000"> </font></a></b></p> <p><b><font size="4">Because nearly 3,000 people died in New York City on September 11, 2001, from the seizure of four airliners, Stich submitted for filing a lawsuit in that jurisdiction. On August 8, 2002, Stich submitted a similar filing to the U.S. district court, along with the filing fee and all necessary papers. In this court the judges simply refused to file the papers, which not only violated due process rights, but blocked the reporting of the criminal activities. This obstruction of justice made these judges criminally complicit. (<a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_new_york_district_court.doc">Word</a>) (<a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_new_york_district_court.pdf">Adobe pdf</a>). Chief Judge Mukasey blocked the filing of that lawsuit, which federal law requires be filed upon receipt, for over 12 months, until unknown pressure forced the suit to be filed. </font></b></p> <p><b><font size="4">Before Stich was even notified of the filing Judge Mukasey signed an order dismissing it. This dismissal violated the criminal statute requiring him to receive the information on criminal activities, and also continued the practice of massive violations of civil due process.</font></b></p> <hr> <p align="center"><u><b><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Complicity of Supreme Court Justices">COMPLICITY OF SUPREME COURT JUSTICES</a></font></b></u></p> <p><b><font size="4">Stich made the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court aware of these judicial acts. They had supervisory responsibilities over federal judges. They had the same responsibilities to receive the reports of criminal activities. They repeatedly refused to exercise their responsibilities as the top federal judiciary, and their responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statut3es to receive the information and evidence of criminal activities that had not only left a deadly trail on September 11, 2001, but far more. It requires a reading of the books written by former federal agent Rodney Stich, especially Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies, to learn how long they have been criminally involv3ed and how much deadly hard has resulted from their complicity of cover-ups. </font></b> <hr> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center"> <font color="#FF0000" size="4"><b> <a name="Scores of Criminal States Repeatedly Violated">CRIMINAL STATUTES REPEATEDLY VIOLATED BY FEDERAL JUDGES</a></b></font></p><b> <p><font size="4">Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). "Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." </font></p> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 241. Conspiracy against rights of citizens</font><font size="4"><br>If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; ... They shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... or both;</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">This felony occurred several times as federal judges retaliated against Stich for reporting, as required by Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, criminal activities which he and his group of several dozen present and former government agents discovered, federal judges retaliated against him.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505. Whoever corruptly ... influences, obstructs, or impedes </font><font size="4">or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due the proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States ... shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">This criminal act occurred several times as federal judges retaliated against Stich for making the reports. </font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C § 1510. Obstruction of criminal investigation.</font><font size="4"><br>(a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">This criminal statute occurred as federal judges refused to receive the evidence that Stich and his group of government insiders sought to report. Federal judges refused to receive the evidence, retaliated against Stich for seeking to make the reports, and then rendered orders barring Stich for the remainder of his life from court access. In this way, Stich was unable to report the federal crimes (and also unable to use federal defenses against the judicial violations of federally protected rights that were inflicting great harm upon Stich. </font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant</font><font size="4"><u><br></u>(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to– </font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;<br><br>(2) cause or induce any person to–<br> </font></p> <p><font size="4">(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;</font></p> <p><font size="4">(3) <u>hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge</u> of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.</font></p></b> <p><b><font size="4">(c) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from–<br></font> </p> <p><font size="4">(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding;<br> <br><br>(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ... (3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or<br><br><br>(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation preceding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding; or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.</font></p> <p><font size="4">(e) For the purposes of this section–</font></p> <p><font size="4">(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense; and<br><br>(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege. </font> </p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4">Federal judges, and directly Sacramento district judge Milton Schwartz and San Francisco district judge Marilyn Patel, aided by other judges, retaliated against Stich when he exercised the mandatory responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, to report federal crimes "to a federal judge." In this manner they were guilty of criminal acts under several criminal statutes.</font></p><hr> <p><font color="#FF0000"><u><font size="4">Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant</font></u><font size="4">. </font></font><font size="4"> <br>(a) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for (1) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ..."</font></p> <blockquote><hr> </blockquote> </blockquote> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4">    JUDICIAL RETALIATIONS WERE CRIMINAL ACTS</font></p></b> <blockquote><b> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513.</font><font size="4"> Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant. (a) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for (1) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense </font></p> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 111. </font> <font size="4">Impeding certain officers or employees. Whoever ... intimidates, or interferes with any person ... while engaged in ... the performance of his official duties shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... </font></p> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 35. Imparting or conveying false information <br></font><font size="4">(b) Whoever willfully and maliciously, or with reckless disregard for the safety of human life, imparts or conveys or <u>causes to be imparted or conveyed false information</u>, knowing the information to be false, concerning an attempt or alleged attempt being made or to be made, to do any act which would be a crime prohibited by this chapter or chapter 97 or chapter 11 of this tile--shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. [Aircraft and motor vehicles chapter.]</font></p> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 34. Penalty when death results </font><font size="4"><br>Whoever is convicted of any crime prohibited by this chapter, which has resulted in the death of any person, shall be subject also to the death penalty or to imprisonment for life ... </font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">Many deaths did occur, repeatedly, due to the violations of federal air safety and criminal statutes and regulations. Because of the fraud involved, the statute of limitations for anyone to sue United Airlines and the federal government has not yet started to run and won't start until the public has this information. Both parties can be sued even though prior lawsuits were settled, but settled without the knowledge of the fraud involved, which would justify huge punitive damages. Stich has the government documents that would justify the lawsuits.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 1001.</font><font size="4"> Whoever in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined ... or imprisoned ...</font></p> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 1621. Perjury generally</font><font size="4">. Whoever (1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal ... willfully and contrary to such oath states ... any material matter which he does not believe to be true, he shall be fined ... or imprisoned ...</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">These criminal offenses repeatedly occurred in the various federal proceedings described in the books and various lawsuits.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 2. Principals.</font><font size="4"> (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">The legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who "aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures" another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. Federal judges repeatedly committed these criminal offenses by becoming accomplices as they blocked the reporting of the criminal activities, retaliated against Stich for seeking to make the reports, and shielded those who perpetrated criminal acts in court proceedings.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 3. Accessory after the fact. </font><font size="4">Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">Federal judges repeatedly became accessory after the fact as they protected the guilty through the cover-ups, obstruction of justice, retaliating against witnesses.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"> <font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States.</font><font size="4"> If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof, in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined ... or imprisoned.</font></span></p> <blockquote> <p><span style="font-family: Times New Roman"><font size="4">The United States has been and continues to be defrauded in many ways by the conduct of the federal judges (and others).</font></span></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Frauds and swindles. </font><font size="4">Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, .... for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined ... or imprisoned .... or both.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">These criminal violations occurred in the schemes to take Stich's assets to halt his expensive exposing of criminal and subversive activities of government officials.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Fraud by wire, radio, or television.</font><font size="4"><br>Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">    Telephones were used in carrying out the schemes.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 245. Federally protected activities. </font><font size="4">(b) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, by force or threat of force willfully injures, intimidates or interferes with, or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with–(1) any person because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons [whistleblowers against corruption in government] from–(B) participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; (C) applying for or enjoying employment, or any perquisite thereof, by any agency of the United States.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">All of the judicial acts taken against Stich arose from his attempts to expose criminal activities implicating people in key government offices and criminal activities in covert operations.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 246. Deprivation of relief benefits. </font><font size="4">Whoever directly or indirectly deprives, attempts to deprive, or threatens to deprive any person of any employment, position, work, compensation, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress appropriating funds for work relief or relief purposes, on account of political affiliation [whistleblower] ... shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.</font></p> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 241. Conspiracy against [civil] rights. </font><font size="4">If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; ... they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">Record setting violations were inflicted upon Stich during the 17-year period in the California and federal courts, primarily by judges acting to insure the success of the CIA-front law firm.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 18 U.S.C. § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law.</font><font size="4"><br>Whoever, under <i>color of any law</i>, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or ..., shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; </font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">These violations were directly perpetrated by the CIA-front law firm and California judges, and then indirectly aided and abetted by federal judges.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy.</font><font size="4"><br>Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 U.S.C. § 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented;</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">Federal judges were the main people who had the power to prevent the civil rights violations. Instead, they escalated them.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Creation of remedy.</font><font size="4"> In a case of actual controversy within its jurisdiction, any court of the United States, upon the filing of an appropriate pleading, may declare the rights and other legal relations of any interested party seeking such declaration, whether or not further relief is or could be sought. Any such declaration shall have the force and effect of a final judgment or decree and shall be reviewable as such.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">This remedy was denied to Stich by federal judges, compounding the denial of the Civil Rights Act remedy.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">Title 28 U.S.C. § 2202. Further relief.</font><font size="4"> Further necessary or proper relief based on a declaratory judgment or decree may be granted, after reasonable notice and hearing, against any adverse party whose rights have been determined by such judgment.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">This remedy was also denied to Stich by federal judges, compounding the denial of the Civil Rights Act remedy. Several methods were used to block Stich's reporting of the criminal activities, using a sham lawsuit filed by a CIA-front law firm and other tactics.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font color="#FF0000" size="4">Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides that "No person shall ... be deprived of ... liberty, or property, without due process of law;"</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">Throughout the 20-year pattern of continuing judicial proceedings, record-setting substantive and procedural due process violations occurred in both the California and the federal courts. Stich's life's assets consisting of $10 million in real estate were taken from him while violating statutory and constitutional protections of a noticed hearing, a hearing, legally recognized cause, and then covered up by falsifying records. </font></p> <p><font size="4">He repeatedly suffered retaliation from California judges when he exercised procedural due process rights.</font></p> <p><font size="4">California judges continuously violated during a six-year span record numbers of state and federal statutes, rules of court, Supreme Court decisions, and constitutional protections. California judges acted without personal and subject matter jurisdiction.</font></p> <p><font size="4">In the federal courts, federal judges repeatedly refused to perform their duty under the Civil Rights Act and Declaratory Judgment Act that was invoked by the unprecedented numbers of violations of federally protected rights.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Federal judges retaliated against Stich for exercising federal due process remedies for these record-setting violations of federally protected rights.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Federal judges, instead of upholding and enforcing the laws and Constitution of the United States, repeatedly violated them, encouraged others to escalate their violations of these protections.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Federal judges combined their sabotage of federal civil liberties and civil rights protections with criminal acts, as stated in the lawsuit and in the books mentioned here.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Federal judges misused their judicial positions and the courts as a corrupt arm of government, obstructing justice, inflicting great harm upon the rule of law, upon what integrity remained in the federal judiciary, and overall inflicted great harm upon the internal security of the United States.</font></p> </blockquote> <p><font size="4" color="#FF0000">14th Amendment</font><font size="4">. No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">All of these rights and protections were repeatedly violated by California judges in the sham lawsuit filed by the CIA-front law firm. Federal judges then aided and abetted these violations, rewarding those who perpetrated these violations.</font></p> </blockquote> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4">TREASONOUS CONDUCT</font></p> <p><font size="4">The definition of treason includes criminal attempts to destroy the lawful existence of government offices; a breach of allegiance, such as the allegiance to support the laws and Constitution of the United States.</font></p> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4">SUBVERSIVE CONDUCT</font></p> <p><font size="4">Subversive conduct is conduct that undermines and overthrows established authority of the government. Undermining the foundation of government. The judicial conduct that subverts the laws and Constitution of the United States, that obstructs justice, that aids and abets criminal activities, meet this definition.</font></p><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4">Heavy Involvement of ACLU Lawyers in Aiding and Abetting These Subversive, Treasonous, Criminal, and Civil Rights Violations</font></p> <p><font size="4" color="Black">For forty years, starting when Stich was seeking assistance as a federal investigator to address the ongoing corruption related to a series of air disasters, ACLU lawyers repeatedly covered up for the criminal and related civil rights violations. This misconduct is shown by numerous letters to and from the ACLU. </font><font size="4"> </font></p> <hr> <p><font color="#FF0000" size="4"> <a name="Severity of Crimes Covered Up Provides Longer prison sentences">SEVERITY OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES PROVIDES FOR LONGER PRISON SENTENCES</a> </font></p> <p><font size="4">Federal sentencing guidelines require that anyone--and that includes federal judges and Justice Department lawyers--who in any way impedes the prosecution of criminal offenses shall have their length of imprisonment increased. The <a href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com/prison_enhancement.html" target="_top">additional prison time</a> depends entirely upon the severity of the criminal activities that their actions prevent from being reported or prosecuted. </font></p> <p><font size="4">The refusal to receive the reports and evidence of criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, the unlawful and unconstitutional judicial orders barring access to the federal courts and thereby block the reporting of these criminal activities, the judicial and Justice Department retaliation for the federal filing seeking to report the crimes, and the retaliatory taking of Stich's assets, are all a part of the widespread judicial obstruction of justice for which the law requires much longer prison sentences based upon the enormity of the criminal acts being protected. </font></p><hr> <p align="center"><font color="#FF0000" size="4">Related Web Sites</font></p> <ul> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chronology of decades of corrupt activities by the CIA, U.S. politicians, and other members of the system, as described in the book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.defraudingamerica.com">Defrauding America</a></i>.</font></li> </ul> <ul> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chronology of the arrogant and corrupt war on drugs--against the American people--as described in the book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.druggingamerica.com">Drugging America</a></i>.<br> </font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chronology of arrogant and corrupt activities in the deadly politics of aviation safety, as described in the book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.unfriendlyskies.com">Unfriendly Skies</a></i>.<br> </font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Chronology of covert and corrupt activities in which the American people suffered the consequences of blowback, as described in the e-book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.blowback911.com">Blowback, 9/11, Iraq, Lies, and Cover-ups</a></i>.<br> </font></li> <li><font face="Times New Roman" size="4">Story of a CIA operation based in Honolulu and its titular head, who was made a scapegoat by CIA and Justice Department personnel and a federal judge, after its cover was blown, and as described in the e-book, <i> <a target="_top" href="http://www.disavow.com">Disavow</a></i>.<br> </font></li> </ul> <p><a name="Informational print and e-books books"><font size="4">Informational print and e-books books</font></a><font size="4"> describing these matters can be ordered by <a target="_top" href="https://www.defraudingamerica.com/order_form.html">clicking here</a>.</font></p> <p><font size="4">Note: The books and other activities are non-profit, relying on funds obtained elsewhere, and arise out of the determination by Rodney Stich to provide this information to the public concerning unprecedented threats and sources of great harm to the United States, national security, and its people.</font></p> <blockquote> <p><font size="4">Help fund our exposure activities by placing orders for <i>any</i> amazon.com products through our links. </font></p> <p> <iframe width="180" height="150" frameborder="0" scrolling="no" name="I1" src="http://rcm.amazon.com/e/cm?t=unfriendlskie-20&o=1&p=27&l=qs1&f=ifr"></iframe> </p> <p class="1Booktext" align="left"> </p> </blockquote> <p> </p> <p><font size="4">  </font></p></b> <p ALIGN="center"><b><font COLOR="Red" size="4"><a HREF="#TOP">RETURN TO THE TOP</a></font></b></p> </blockquote> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"> </p> <p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: justify"> </p> </blockquote> </body> <p> </p> <p><P> This website requires a browser that supports "frames".</p> <p></BODY></p> <p></NOFRAMES></p> <p></HTML</p> <p> </p> </body>