List of legal submissions to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court

<body> Filings Submitted to U.S. Supreme Court 1979 to 2004 Revealing Complicity in Major Crimes Against the United States and Its People The justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were fully informed about: The federal criminal activities that former federal agent Rodney Stich sought to report to a federal judge under the federal crime reporting statute. The Justices knew that the federal judges, over whom they had supervisory responsibilities, were criminally blocking the reports. Further, the Justices had similar responsibilities to receive the information of criminal activities, which were presented to them by Rodney Stich. In the period from about 1979 to about 1984, petitions were filed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the lawsuits filed by Stich against the FAA and the NTSB. These petitions made serious charges associated with specific airline disasters and deaths, and the felony obstruction of justice by federal judges and Justice Department officials. Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court knew of the f4elony retaliation against the former federal agent for exercising the responsibilities to report major federal crimes. Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court knew of the unlawful and unconstitutional orders by federal judges barring the former federal agent, for the remainder of his life, from filing any papers in any federal district or appellant court. The justices knew that the orders obstructed justice by blocking his reports of the criminal activities, and voided for him the legal and constitutional defenses necessary to defend against the repeated major civil and constitutional violations by California and federal judges. The Justices knew of the repeated and massive violations of civil and criminal laws and constitutional protections by federal judges. The felony retaliation against the former federal agent for exercising the responsibility to report major federal crimes associated with great harm and many deaths. The felony retaliation against the former federal agent for exercising civil and constitutional defenses against repeated and massive violations of state and federal legal and constitutional rights and protections. Partial List of Legal Papers Submitted to Justices of U.S. Supreme Court Prior to 9/11 From 1980 to 2001 The importance of this information is that: Some of the submissions sought to report the corrupt and criminal activities associated with a series of ongoing airline disasters. The submissions were being made by a former key federal aviation safety agent. They were made under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statutes. The submissions reported the blocks by federal judges to the reports, making the judicial acts obstruction of justice felonies. Supreme Court Justices had supervisory responsibilities over the conduct of federal judges. The documented acts by federal judges corrupted thee federal courts. Massive civil right violations were involved. The actions by federal judges, blocking the reports of federal crimes, retaliating against the person seeking to report the crimes, were criminal acts per se, and did not require the charges of criminal activities to be true for the judicial acts to be crimes (however, the charges were true). By refusing to act, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were: Covering up for major crimes against the United States. Covering up for federal judges involved in felonious obstruction of justice and felonious retaliation against witnesses. Enabling to continue the conditions that made it possible for four groups of terrorists to hijack four airliners on 9/11. Enabling federal crimes involving other areas of nati8onal security to continue. The many submissions occurred because: Numerous criminal avctiviti4s were discovered during this time frame, and as they were discovered, and the had to be reported, as required by the federal crime reporting statute. There were dozens and dozens of legal violations of civil and constitutional rights as part of the various schemes to silence him, and if legal defenses were not exercised (which would be foolish), the defenses would be lost. The gravity of the consequences of the corruption that h4e tried to report, including thousands of deaths in airline disasters during a 30 year span, justified taking whatever actions that could bring a halt to the ripple effects. Every attempt to exercise state and federal defenses against the continuing, for 25 years was blocked, necessitating continued exercise of legal and constitutional defenses. The federal causes of actions included, for instance: Reporting the criminal activities related to a series of fatal airline disasters. Reporting the criminal activities in other areas. Exercising defenses against the sham legal actions taking place in California courts. Exercising defenses against the illegal and unconstitutional taking of his $10 million in assets (that funded his exposure activities). Exercising defenses to regain the civil and constitutional rights taken by the half dozen unlawful and unconstitutional orders barring him, for the remainder of his life, from filing any papers sin any federal district or appellate court. More coming. Legal actions directly related to the causes of 911 Disasters for those wanting to focus on the lawsuits revealing corruption responsible for the conditions that enabled 19 terrorists to so easily hijack four airliners within a matter of a few hours. Long Documented History of Judicial Corruption and Great American Tragedies 1980-1985 Lawsuits against FAA and NTSB 1986-1990 (Legal filings relating to a bizarre and sham lawsuit) Lawsuits relating to a bizarre and sham lawsuit that immediately stripped the whistleblower of the assets that funded his exposure activities. A sham divorce action was filed against him by a CIA-front law firm, enabling orders to be rendered claiming all assets were community properties, and thereby controlled by California judges. The only problem was that he had been divorced for 18 years; five divorce judgments showed that, any one of which must be recognized under California and federal law; and the former wife, living in Addison, Texas, had been, and continued to declare herself divorced. After California and federal judges refused to act, as required, Stich sought to force a federal judge to recognize that he wasn't divorced by filing chapter 11, even though he had no financial problems. At that time he was unaware of the extensive corruption in the bankruptcy courts. http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_declare_divorce_judgments.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_petition_property_seizure.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_emerg_stay_9th_oct05_1988.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_emerg_stay_9th_oct05_1988.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_report_crimes_0636_jan27_1992.doc (redo) http://www.defraudingamerica.com/kennedy_supreme_court.html Complicity of Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy, starting while he was a judge in the federal courts at San Francisco. Emergency brief filed with Judge Anthony Kennedy just prior to his placement on the U.S. Supreme Court, showing his complicity in the corruption and cover-ups. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) 1991 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_souter_jan09_1991.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_souter_jan09_1991.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup.crt_suter_clk_jan_09_1991.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup.crt_suter_clk_jan_09_1991.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_declare_divorce_judgments_jan25_1991.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_declare_divorce_judgments_jan25_1991.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_ninth_circuit_contempt_1991.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_feb05_1991.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_writ_souter_feb05_1991.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_writ_souter_feb05_1991.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_walker_retaliation_feb05_1991.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_walker_retaliation_mar05_1991.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_walker_retaliation_mar05_1991.pdf sup_crt_walker_retaliation_mar04_1991.doc sup_crt_walker_retaliation_mar04_1991.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_justice_white_letter_oct2891.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_justice_white_letter_oct2891.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_ninth_circuit_contempt_1991.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_white_letter.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_white_letter_jpg http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_emergency_writ_dca_nov10_1991.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_ninth_circuit_contempt_1991.html 1992 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_emerg_rel_sfo_0636_jan27_1992.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_emerg_rel_sfo_0636_jan27_1992.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_report_crimes_0636_jan27_1992.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_report_crimes_0636_jan27_1992.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_writ_walker_rehnquist_june26_1992.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_writ_walker_rehnquist_june26_1992.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_Pet_retaliation_blackmun_jul14_1992.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_Pet_retaliation_blackmun_jul14_1992.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_writ_walker_blackmun_jul14_1992.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_writ_walker_blackmun_jul14_1992.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_writ_retaliation_jul14_1992.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_walker_1992.doc 1994 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_emergency_rights_1994.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_emergency_rights_aug15_1994.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_emergency_rights_aug15_1994.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_injunction_constitutional_rights_1994.doc (redo) http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_property_seizure_sep05_1994.html (redo) 1995 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup.crt_suter_clk_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup.crt_suter_clk_jan02_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_clk_suter_Jan_12_1995.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ginsburg_letter_jan16_1995.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ginsburg_letter_jan16_1995.pdf 1997 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_sup_crt__april11_1997.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_sup_crt__april11_1997.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_aug15_1997.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_aug15_1997.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_aug15_1997.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_aug15_1997.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_clk_suter_aug23_1997.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_clk_suter_aug23_1997.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_book_aug1597.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_letter_rehnquist_aug24_1997.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_letter_rehnquist_aug24_1997.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_petition_aug15_1997.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_petition_aug15_1997.pdf 1998 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_clerk_aug23_1998.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_clerk_aug23_1998.pdf 2000 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup.crt_suter_clk_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup.crt_suter_clk_jan02_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_mar16_2000.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_mar16_2000.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_rehnquist_april11_2000.htm http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_emergency_petition_oct2000.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_nov10_2000.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_nov10_2000.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_reno_nov10_2000.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_sec_submission_dec12_2000.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_sec_submission_dec12_2000.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_clk_suter_dec12_2000.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_clk_suter_dec12_2000.pdf 2001 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_thomas_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ginsburg_jan201.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup.crt_suter_clk_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup.crt_suter_clk_jan02_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_souter_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_souter_jan02_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ petition_oconnor_jan501.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ petition_oconnor_jan501.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_oconnor_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_oconnor_jan02_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_kennedy_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_kennedy_jan02_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_ginsburg_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_ginsburg_jan02_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_jan02_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_jan02_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_thomas_jan15_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_thomas_jan15_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_thomas_feb8_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_thomas_feb8_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_thomas_feb15_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_thomas_feb15_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_emergency_petition_thomas.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_apr11_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_apr11_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_jun05_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_jun05_2001.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_rehnquist_dec28_2001.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_rehnquist_dec28_2001.pdf 2002 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_thomas_may2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_dca_april22_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_dca_april22_2002.pdf Submissions to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court After 9/11 2002 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ rehnquist_jan02_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ rehnquist_jan02_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_dca_april22_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_dca_april22_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_justices_may01_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_justices_may01_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_thomas_may03_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_thomas_may03_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_thomas_reno_may01_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/pet_thomas_reno_may01_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_oct14_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_oct14_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_scalia_oct21_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_scalia_oct21_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_dec12_2000.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_dec12_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_dec16_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_dec16_2002.pdf 2003 Involving Obstruction of Justice by District Judge Michael Mukasey http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_jan26_2003.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_jan26_2003.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_feb06_2003.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_feb06_2003.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_thomas_may01_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_thomas_may01_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_rehnquist_dec16_2002.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_rehnquist_dec16_2002.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_kennedy_oct21_2003.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_kennedy_oct21_2003.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ginsburg_oct21_2003.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_ginsburg_oct21_2003.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_oct21_20_2003.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_oct21_20_2003.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_souter_oct21_2003.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_souter_oct21_2003.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_thomas_oct21_2003.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_thomas_oct21_2003.pdf 2004 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_jan30_2004.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_letter_rehnquist_jan30_2004.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_rehearing_nyc_en_banc_sep07_2004.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_rehearing_nyc_en_banc_sep07_2004.pdf 2005 http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_jan05_2005.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_petition_jan05_2005.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_pet_nyc_jan20_2005.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_pet_nyc_jan20_2005.pdf Miscellaneous http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_conduct_implications.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_manhattan_grand_jury.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_manhattan_grand_jury.pdf http://www.defraudingamerica.com/petition_rehearing_en_banc.doc http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sup_crt_kennedy_supreme_court.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/violations_by_supreme_court_justices.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/list_of_filings_supreme_court.html http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_involvement.html Sampling of filings with the U.S. Supreme Court showing that the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were aware of the criminal activities, the judicial cover-ups, the judicial retaliation, and the tragedies arising from this conduct. Lawsuit Filed Against Justices of U.S. Supreme Court Although bizarre sounding, the facts stated in the lawsuit were accurate, and justified naming the Justices as defendants. If the cover-ups and other wrongdoings by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were perpetrated by non-government people, or corporations, they would be charged with criminal acts. Many Americans were sent to prison for committing just one of the many documented acts of obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting, and being accomplices in criminal acts. Tragedies Occurring During Supreme Court Cover-Ups All forms of human tragedies have been inflicted upon the people of the United States from the corruption discovered by the people behind this site−and made possible by enablers in and out of government. The below pictures are only a sampling of the consequences from the documented corruption that are able to be portrayed graphically. The tragedies in other areas resulting from the corruption, cover-ups, and public indifference, are not shown here. United Airlines crash into New York City, the world's worst at that time. Withheld from the Amererica public were the reports by federal safety inspectors-investigators showing a continuing pattern of corruption, fraud, criminal alteration of major government required records−and the standard abuse of those few inspectors attempting to require the airline management to comply with industry standards and clear requirements of federal aviation safety requirements−and FAA management to require compliance. None of the guilty, the enablers, to these and the continuing fraud-related crashes ever were held accountable for the hundreds of deaths that they enabled to occur. These few examples of the horrors associated with airline disasters enabled to occur by documented corruption withheld from the American people. The standard culture of cover-ups in the United States enabled the corruption, cover-ups, to mutate into different areas. In the aviation area, although the continuing series of airline disasters eventually came to a halt for other reasons, the culture continued, and enabled to occur a number of easily preventable airline disasters. The inbred culture created the conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to easily hijack four airliners within a few hours of each other and kill nearly 3,000 people. In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences. Forewarned downing of TWA Flight 800 (and U.S. Embassies in Africa, as detailed in the book, Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, and the Mafia). Forewarned bombings of U.S. Embassies in Africa: Among the "Least" Guilty of the Enablers Euphoric Blissful Ignorance−Enablers of Great American Tragedies Others Who Cooperated, With Tragic Consequences for Thousands of Americans Just in the aviation area, many thousands of people died in airline disasters caused by known safety problems and safety violations since 1950. The details are in the book, Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries. These safety matters were prevented from being known by the public through the actions of over 50 lawyers and law firms, several dozen California judges, and dozens of federal judges. A few of the related previously uploaded pages listing the massive involvement of lawyers and judges, and the tragic consequences of their actions. 9/11 lawsuit information Scheme by CIA-front lawyers and lawyers to silence the whistleblower exposing high-level corruption in government. South Carolina judges and lawyers using possible wife murderer in sham lawsuit to silence former federal agent. Los Angeles area law firm and lawyers seeking to seize the books exposing the deadly corruption. Sampling of people complicit in conduct that enabled the corruption to continue that, among other tragedies, made possible the deaths of nearly 3,000 people on September 11, 2001. Legal Filings Defending Against Criminal Contempt of Court Charges Because he was abandoned by his lawyers, including those that he paid over $30,000, and by court-appointed lawyers (loyal to those who hired them, the DOJ officials), Stich had to prepare and file his own defense briefs. Contempt of court reply brief, May 26, 1991 (MS Word) Contempt of court reply brief, May 26, 1991 (Adobe PDF) Contempt of court appeal brief Comments At least, he tried. Those who were killed in fraud related crashes, or those who suffered, and those who continue to suffer from the consequences of the corruption, can at least say that someone was fighting for them. And that would include those who jumped to their deaths from the World Trade Center, or the other nearly 3,000 people who died such a horrible death, can say, someone was at there at least trying! Give a little thought, or a hell of a lotta thought, to the implications of all these judges showing contempt for the lives of those that had been lost, and those that would be lost, by their felony cover-ups of crimes against the American people. And IF, and that is a big IF, enough people would get off their asses and help expose this information, major areas of corruption inbred in the cultures within the United States could be, finally, addressed. Return to www.defraudingamerica.com </body>