Letters and list of legal filings submitted to Supreme Court reporting corruption in government.

<body> Since 1978, former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to circumvent the standard cover-ups in government, sought to report to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court the criminal activities that he initially discovered as a key federal aviation safety inspector-investigator, but also criminal activities in other areas of government operations that he later learned from the many other government agents and insiders who provided him with detailed information and evidence. In addition, Stich reported, and sought relief, from the series of unlawful and unconstitutional retaliatory actions taken against him that were parallel efforts to halt his exposure of criminal activities that were inflicting great harm upon major national matters, including national security, and in the aviation environment, resulting in numerous preventable deaths. Can an American Citizen be Sent to Prison For Reporting Corruption Linked to 9/11? Can an American citizen be charged with criminal contempt of court and sentenced to federal prison for seeking to report criminal activities of people in government operations that: Had already resulted in a series of fatal airline disasters. Would later result in Middle East people carrying out a terrorist scheme, and hijack four airliners, and hijack four airliners on 9/11. Is responsible for great harm to be inflicted upon the United States and the American peoeple. The lawsuits filed and submitted for filing, shown here, will help to give the answers. Sampling of Legal Filings Submitted to U.S. Supreme Court and Directly to Justices Petitioner seeking relief from the last criminal contempt of court resulting from orders of U.S. District Judges Marilyn Petal and Walker, San Francisco, March 4, 1991. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Several years later, U.S. district court judges Marilyn Petal and Walker (San Francisco), again charged Stich with criminal contempt of court, resulting in his arrest and then house arrest for five years, for filing papers in out-of-state federal courts seeking to report criminal activities and exercising federal defenses against the massive violations of federally protected rights that were parallel efforts to halt his exposure activities. Stich filed a petition for emergency relief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco. January 22, 1992. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Petition to Supreme Court for emergency relief, return of civil rights permanently terminated by series of unlawful and unconstitutional injunctive orders barring Stich from filing any papers in any federal court. (August 15, 1994) The effect--and surely the intent--was to block Stich from filing papers under the federal crime reporting statute to report criminal activities in government offices to a federal judge. The other probably intent was to block Stich from exercising the multiple federal defenses against the massive numbers of repeated violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) 1997 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court, which would have exposed a broad pattern of criminal and subversive activities as defined in Stich's books, the third editions of Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America, and Drugging America. This filing would have made a Supreme Court record of these matters, and required the Justices to engage in a documented cover-ups of the grave charges. This petition was submitted on August 15, 1997. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) It was improperly refused filing, apparently to avoid making a record of the corrupt activities by federal judges over whom the Justices of the Supreme Court have supervisory responsibilities. This tactic repeated the prior pattern, which would be duplicated in the future, of Supreme Court judges blocking the reports of criminal activities and misusing the federal courts as a racketeering tool through judicially perpetrated civil rights violations while concurrently voiding legal and constitutional defenses. Organized crime never had it so good! Prior to seeking relief from the Justices of the Supreme Court from the contempt of court sentence, Stich filed a petition for emergency relief with the 9th Cir. for contempt of court sentence. (October 5, 1998) (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court submitted on November 10, 2000, under Supreme Court rule 12, Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651, and Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. No response. The court never responded to this petition and never filed it, despite the legal requirement to do so. November 10, 2000. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor, submitted on January 5, 2001, under the authority of Supreme Court Rule 12 and Rule 22 providing for application to an individual Justice, and Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Even if relief was denied, a response is required under Supreme Court Rule 22.6, which says: "The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an application." Following their standard practice, the submission was never acknowledged. To have done so would have made a record of the fact that the Justices were made aware of the very serious charges and did nothing about them. No response, despite the legal responsibility to at least answer, such as denying the petition. But to do so would make an official record of their cover-ups and obstruction of justice. January 5, 2001. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Petition sent to Chief Justice Rehnquist, January 2, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Letters Sent to Supreme Court Justices Reporting Major Criminal Activities, Some in Their Area of Supervisory Responsibilities Letters to all of the Supreme Court Justices, January 2, 2001, sent to each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court referring to documented pattern of corruption by federal judges in the West Coast's Ninth Circuit, which included a 20 year pattern of repeatedly blocking the reporting of criminal activities, judicial retaliation for attempting to make such reports that were required to be made under the federal crime reporting statute, and the involvement of numerous federal judges in a scheme to take Stich's $10 million in assets that funded his public-spirited exposure of criminal activities. That scheme required 20 years of uninterrupted violations of dozens of state and federal laws compounded by violations of every legal and constitutional due process defense guaranteed to all citizens. No response to these letters stating documented facts revealing major crimes against the United States, including those perpetrated by federal judges over whom they have supervisory responsibilities and vicarious liabilities. This non-response, the cover-up, the obstruction of justice, reflects the seriousness of the corruption against the people by those in control of the system. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) The year 2003: Letter to Rehnquist October 21, 2003. (The same letter was sent to Justice Thomas and Souter.) This letter was an extensive description of the criminal activities, the felony cover-ups by federal judges, and the sham legal actions that violated large numbers of federally protected rights for which federal remedies existed, which were denied to me by federal judges. The significance of the sham lawsuits was dual efforts to halt Stich's exposure activities by stripping him of the $10 million in assets that funded his exposure activities. Note: Every letter sent to Chief Justice William Rehnquist had copies sent to each of the other Justices. (Word) (Adobe) Letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist, February 6, 2003. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) The year 2002: Letter to Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, December 16, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Letter to Rehnquist October 14, 2002. (Word) (Adobe) Letter to Justice Thomas May 3, 2002. (Word) (Adobe) Petition to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas dated May 3, 2002. The primary issues in the petition were the massive civil and constitutional violations being inflicted upon Stich by a CIA-front law firm and the aiding and abetting by federal judges. The petition included details of how federal judges were blocking the reporting of criminal activities, and listed some of the criminal activities for which Stich and his group of other former government agents had discovered and sought to report. Justice Thomas refused to provide any relief, thereby aiding and abetting the criminal activities, some of which played key roles enabling the events of September 11, 2001, thereby insuring a continuation of the years of deja vu tragedies. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Letter to Chief Justice Rehnquist, January 2, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) The year 2001: Letters sent to Chief Justice Rehnquist and each of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (April 11, 2001). Word) (Adobe) Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, Petition for emergency relief, March 3, 2001. The purpose of this petition was to obtain relief from the civil and constitutional violations being inflicted upon Stich in efforts to block his exposure of criminal activities, paralleling the judicial block to such reports. The petition also reported the criminal activities that Stich sought to report under the federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4). Some of the criminal activities that Stich sought to report were primarily responsible for the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. If Thomas--or any of the others who knew of these crimes--had responded to these charges, it is probable that the hijackers could not have succeeded in their plans that had such massive immediate and subsequent catastrophic consequences. Letter to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (February 15, 2001), describing the corruption in the lower federal courts, their obstruction of justice tactics, their felony retaliation against the former federal agent seeking to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute. This letter was a follow-up to an emergency petition submitted to Justice Thomas. No response. (Word) Petition for emergency relief February 8, 2001 to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. Letter to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, February 5, 2001. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, January 2, 2001. The letter described documented misconduct by federal judges, including their blocking of reports of criminal activities, retaliating against the former federal agent for seeking to report the criminal activities, and the civil rights violations that were part of the scheme initiated by a CIA related law firm in San Francisco (Friedman, Sloan and Ross) to block Stich's reporting of the criminal activities Stich discovered within the FAA and other government offices. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Letter to Justice Souter, January 2, 2001. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) The year 2000: Letter dated December 12, 200, to clerk of U.S. Supreme Court addressing his lying in a previous letter as the clerk sought to support his refusal to file a petition with the court. (Word) (Adobe) U.S. Supreme Court Petition for writ of certiorari, November 10, 2000. This petition described the pattern by federal judges of blocking the reports of criminal activities that amounted to obstruction of justice, the civil rights violations that were part of the scheme to block these reports, and other violations. (Word) Letter to Justice Rehnquist April 11, 2000. (Word) (Adobe) (HTML) Letter to Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, March 16, 2000, with similar information. No response. (Word) (Adobe) (html) The year 1998: Letter to U.S. District Judge Milton Schwartz, June 19, 1998, making reference to his role in blocking the reports of criminal activities and his role in the scheme initiated by the CIA-front law firm. (Word) The year 1997: Letter to the clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court, clerk, William K. Sutter, (August 23, 1997) making reference to his role in fraudulently refusing to file a petition for writ of certiorari which would have made a judicial record of certain major segments of the judicial and other corruption which Stich and his group of government agents had discovered, including the pattern of CIA drug trafficking into the United States, the Justice Department retaliation against Stich and his coalition for seeking to report these criminal acts, and the role of federal judges in these actions. August 1997 petition to the United States Supreme Court reported the corruption relating to a series of prior airline crashes and the judicial and Justice Department actions to block these reports, was submitted to the Court in August 1997. (Word) (html) The year 1995: Letter to Ginsberg, January 16, 1995. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) The year 1991: March 4, 1991, Petition for emergency relief to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking relief from the continuation of criminal contempt of court charges for attempting to report criminal activities to a federal court under the federal crime reporting statute (and for exercising federal due process remedies against record-setting violations of state and federal laws initiated by a CIA-front law firm). (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) (html) From 1986 to 1995, a succession of criminal contempt of court charges confined Stich to his home pending trial for attempting to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute. Dire Consequences Made Possible by Supreme Court Justices The Supreme Court pattern of documented misconduct were not simply matters of academic interest. Starting with the Supreme Court misconduct in the 1970s, the cover-ups and obstruction of justice made possible the continuation of very serious misconduct on a national level, as described in the books, Defrauding America, Unfriendly Skies, Drugging America, and Disavow. For instance: Deeply embedded culture of corruption in certain aviation areas (described in Unfriendly Skies) made possible the continuation of tragic consequences. Putting a face on these consequences, many hundreds of men, women, and children were cremated alive or dismembered alive, often after the indescribable fear of waiting for the end to occur. Continuation of the drug smuggling into the United States by people acting under cover of their government operation, including the CIA, DEA, military, the state department, and even into the White House. The tragic consequences associated with these criminal offenses include killings, conversion of areas into war zones, corruption spreading throughout government and society similar to Mexico, elimination of constitutional rights, paramilitary invasions of homes, seizure of assets from innocent people, widespread prosecutorial misconduct, purchased perjured testimony putting innocent people in prison, and wholesale destruction of families. Continuation of the pattern of corrupt activities by people acting under cover of government operations, as described in the books, which have inflicted enormous harm upon the American people. Additional Letters List of letters sent to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Return to Top Return to www.defraudingamerica.com www.druggingamerica.com www.unfriendlyskies.com </body>