This page contains links
to conduct of employees of the highly political U.S.
Department of Justice.
It
contains a sampling of links accumulated over the years by former federal agent
Rodney Stich, and he and his
coalition of other former
government agents and insiders sought to report hardcore
criminal activities of
people in key overt and covert government operations.
Every attempt to report the corruption that constituted crimes against the United States were blocked. And the block enabled to continue not only the underlying criminal activities but also the resulting consequences in preventable aviation disasters, terrorist acts, and other harm upon the American people and the United States. The information is a frightening picture of threats to the American public from the culture in the DOJ that violates numerous obstruction of justice statutes.
Start of
Legal Attacks by
Hoard of Judges and Lawyers
Starting in 1982 and continuing without letup to 2006, over fifty lawyers and law firms, and over 50 federal judges, among others, were involved in parallel schemes seeking to halt the efforts to expose the criminal activities that former federal agent Rodney Stich and his group of other insiders sought to report and make known to the American people.
This page is one of over 1,000 at this site. They all related to overt and covert acts that constitute crimes against the United States and responsible for many different forms of personal and financial harm to the people, as well as making possible several of the most catastrophic events against the United States.
The initial tactics involved the filing of a sham lawsuit against Stich by the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross in San Francisco. The claims made by their lawyers was a sham, factually and legally, and used so that an order could be promptly filed that separated Stich from the assets that funded his exposure actions.
That lawsuit was barred by over a dozen California statutes, numerous California Supreme Court decisions, and barred by federal statutes, U.S. Supreme Court decisions, and constitutional protections.
To succeed, the CIA-front law firm needed the corrupt participation of California judges, and eventually, the participation of federal judges when the massive violations of federally protected rights were brought to federal court under several federal statutes providing for mandatory jurisdiction mover the matters.
Sampling of the judicial tactics used to block the reporting and exposure of the tragedy-related corruption implicating people in key government positions
Pattern of Complicity by
Federal
Judges and Supreme Court Justices
Thumbnail
description of the judicial corruption by federal judges, both in
obstructing justice, and in the parallel sham legal attempts to stop a former
federal agent from continuing his exposure activities.
Another list showing the
judicial sequence.
Brief
history of the judicial corruption, obstruction of justice, retaliation,
and parallel legal schemes.
Tactics by federal judges to cover up
for corrupt and criminal activities that were continuing to inflict great and
catastrophic harm upon the United States and its people.
The
criminal misuse of federal courts and judicial positions, retaliating
against a former federal agent, in efforts to halt the exposure of the
criminal and even subversive activities implicating people in key government
positions.
Years of
cover-ups by Supreme Court Justices, who aided and abetted the underlying
criminal activities and the felony cover-ups by federal judges over whom the
Justices have supervisory responsibilitiesand
vicarious liability.
The
criminal acts arising from the retaliation for attempting to report
criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, and the
criminal acts arising from retaliation for exercising federal defenses against
the massive civil rights violations associated with the parallel legal efforts
to halt Stich's exposure activities.
Other criminal statutes that made the judicial acts repeated felonies.
Obstructing justice statutes. Federal judges were repeatedly guilty of
these crimes, for which they were not only not immune, but guilty of
greater offenses because of their position of trust.
Sampling of
letters sent to federal judges and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sample
list of federal lawsuits seeking to report the criminal activities that
Stich and a group of other former government agents had discovered during
their professional official duties.
One of the Supreme Court Justices
involved with the cover-ups was Supreme Court Justice Anthony. Between the
time that he was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the date that he left
his position as an appellate judge on the 9th Circuit at San Francisco, Stich
filed a petition for an emergency writ with Kennedy. (December 27, 1988) (MS
Word) (Adobe PDF) That petition raised the following issues:
Stich sought to report to a
federal judge under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime
reporting statute the criminal activities that he and several other former
government agents had discovered in government offices as part of their
professional and official duties.
Federal judges repeatedly blocked the
reports, constituting criminal acts, with catastrophic and deadly
consequences arising from the misconduct.
Federal judges and DOJ prosecutors had
charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for attempting to report the
crimes, and for exercising federal defenses against the parallel legal
schemes that violated large numbers of federally protected rights.
Stich was sentenced to go to prison,
and sought a stay of that order.
Kennedy denied the request for relief, thereby aiding and abetting the
continuation of the criminal acts; the judicial cover-ups of such criminal
acts; the misuse of federal courts to retaliate against a person for
attempting to make such reports; and for seeking to halt the great personal
and financial harm arising from the combination of retaliation and denial of
due process. Kennedy was therefore complicit in the tragedies arising from the
continuation of the corrupt and criminal acts. That would include the 3,000
deaths on 9/11 that was made possible by the corruption in the government's
aviation safety offices (primary cause of the hijackings) and in the FBI and
CIA (where the secondary area of blame existed, affecting their ability or
willingness to detect the hijacking scheme.
Some years later, in 2006, Justice Kennedy wrote the leading decision that held that government officials could retaliate against a federal employee for filing a required report that reported corrupt and criminal acts. That was the Ceballos decision.
Parallel Legal and Judicial Schemes
To Halt Exposure Activities
There were various legal schemes seeking to halt Stich's ability to continue reporting and exposing the criminal activities, which parallel the obstruction of justice tactics by federal judges, and involved the same judges.
The
initial scheme was started by the San Francisco CIA-front law firm of
Friedman, Sloan and Ross and several of their lawyers. That scheme is
described in a lawsuit filed in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada. April 24,
2000. (MS
Word) (Adobe
PDF)
Several intermediate legal schemes were filed by lawyers and law firms, which
are not being described at this time.
One
of the last legal schemes was filed by the South Carolina law firm of Smith
and Collins. The goal was to seize the books, Defrauding America, Drugging
America, and Unfriendly Skies. Although it was started by a South
Carolina law firm and lawyers, California judges would against join the scheme
in which they were implicated with the CIA-front law firm years earlier. A
description of the lawsuit and how California judges stripped Stich of every
protection as they did with the prior CIA-front law firm is detailed in a
lawsuit filed by Stich in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada, seeking
relief.
Today, in his 80s, stripped of his multi-million assets, and the absence of any assets, Stich is judgment-proof. He will go to his grave stripped of the legal and constitutional protections, stripped of the assets from years of hard work. And for what!
Complicity of California Judges
In the Tragedy Related Schemes
The sham lawsuit filed by the CIA-front law firm and lawyers could not have proceeded without repeated violations of dozens of state and federal laws. The role of these California judges made them complicit not only in the corrupt misuse of their judicial positions, but in the deaths and other events that were made possible by the block to exposing the federal crimes. Under federal case law, the California judges and California courts met the definition of a racketeering enterprise.
Laws violated by California judges acting in unison with CIA-front law firm and their lawyers.
Prior to the start of the sham action by the CIA-front law firm and lawyers, federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors had in three instances blocked the reporting of the criminal activities that Stich sought to report sunder the federal crime reporting statute. After Stich exercised federal remedies seeking a halt to the massive violations of personal and property rights arising from the combination sham filing and the massiv4e violations of law by California judges, Stich filed federal actions that required federal judges to provide a federal court forum and relief. Never before has any action been filed in federal court where so many basic and major civil and constitutional rights were violated.
As if the source of the sham action arose from inside the federal judiciary or the Department of Justice, federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors joined the complicity by violating the several federal remedies intended to halt the civil and constitutional violations that were involved.
Dozens of federal judges were involved in schemes that had tragic and deadly consequences.
Laws Repeatedly Violated by
California and Federal Judges
Sampling of the many laws that were violated by lawyers, law firms, California judges, and federal judges, during the many years of blocking the reporting of the corrupt and criminal activities.
Sampling of the laws violated by California judges at every level as they supported the scheme by the CIA-front law firm and lawyers.
Sampling of the laws violated by federal judges at every level as they joined in the multiple schemes to silence the former federal agent.
Sampling of criminal obstruction of justice statutes that were repeatedly violated by lawyers and judges in the multiple and parallel schemes to silence the former federal agent.
Sampling of criminal statutes violated by federal judges as they retaliated and inflicted great harm upon Stich for attempting to report the federal crimes.
Other criminal statutes involved.
Sampling of criminal activities covered up by federal judges and DOJ lawyers, assisted by lawyers, law firms, and California judges.
Tactics used to block the continuing exposure of high level corruption that were felonies under the obstruction of justice statutes.
Criminal Contempt of Law Charges
In addition to the cover-ups by members of Congress, Justice Department personnel and others, and blocking the federal actions seeking to report the corrupt and criminal activities. federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors that had been blocking the reports then charged the former federal agent with criminal contempt of court after Stich filed a federal lawsuit at Sacramento seeking to report the (a) criminal activities related to a series of airline disasters; (b) criminal activities involved in drug smuggling directly involving people associated with the CIA; and (c) for exercising federal defenses to halt the great and irreparable harm resulting from the actions of the CIA-front law firm and California judges.
Justice Department personnel and federal judges directly involved in that tactic included:
Description of criminal contempt of court in retaliation for attempting to report major and deadly criminal activities.
Years of Complicity By
Supreme Court Justices
Partial list of papers submitted to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, that made the Justices aware of:
Lawsuit Naming
Supreme Court
Justices
As Defendants
Unprecedented, but justified on the basis of the documented facts, Stich filed a lawsuit against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. He knew the court system was so corrupt that he could never prevail. However, the intent was to make a judicial record of the involvement of Supreme Court Justices, their response to the lawsuit, and the possibility that media people would give publicity to the lawsuit and in turn publicity to the corrupt and criminal activities Stich sought to expose.
The Justices responded, acknowledging they knew of Stich's charges, that they took no action, and that they were totally immune from lawsuits for their conduct.
Pre-9/11 Attempt to
Report Corruption
Making 9/11 Possible
Despite the probability of being again blocked by federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors, and partly due to the additional information from his inside sources about corruption affecting the lives of many people and adversely affecting national security, Stich tried one last time to report what he and his group of other government agents and insiders had discovered.
The lawsuit had multiple federal causes of action, any single one requiring federal judge to receive the information and allow the legal proceedings to go forward. Among the causes of action were:
U.S. District Judge Reed:
Before the Reno judge dismissed the action, blocking Stich from reporting the criminal activities, blocking the exercise of federal defenses, and protecting the defendants, four groups of terrorists hijack four airliners and killed nearly 3,000 people. The hijackings were enabled to occur by the corrupt actions of management in the FAA that blocked from being implemented the known measures to prevent aircraft from being hijacked.
Stich then filed a declaration with the court (January 21, 2002) that further showed the relationship between the wrongful conduct stated in the lawsuit and the hijackings of the four airliners. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
Despite this, U.S. District Judge Reed dismissed the lawsuit before it could proceed
Post-9/11 Lawsuits Reporting
Corruption Making 9/11 Possible
The 3,000 deaths that were so easily preventable, and the signs of cover-ups by members of Congress and the 9/11 Commission, caused Stich to again file a federal action under the federal crime reporting statute, attempting once again to report the evidence of criminal activities that enabled terrorists to hijack the four airliners on September 11, 2001.
Again, federal judges blocked the action. The judge who died, Michael Mukasey, would receive the usual reward for being on "the team," cooperating with those in control of the system. After Mukasey retired, President George W. Bush appointed him to the top law enforcement position. United States Attorney General.
Mukasey blocked the lawsuit from being filed, despite the mandatory requirement to file complaints when they are received. It wasn't until 13 months later, after Stich wrote letters to each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, informing them of the latest obstruction of justice by judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities that the lawsuit was filed.
Then, and with apparent approval by the Supreme Court Justices, Mukasey issued an order within minutes of the filing that dismissed the lawsuit. That dismissal violated his mandatory requirement under the federal crime reporting statute to receive the information of federal crimes, and violated dozens of statutes, rules of court, and constitutional protection barring such dismissal without a hearing.
The facts in the matter showed that the future attorney general of the United States was guilty of obstruction of justice and other criminal acts.
Complicity by District of Columbia Judges
By this time, it was obviously clear that despite the 3,000 deaths, federal judges were not going to allow these matters to see the light of day, especially with the involvement of probably over 100 federal judges during the past 30 years and the involvement of so many deaths that they made possible.
However, to make a record, showing the complicity of federal judges in the powerful District of Columbia federal courts, Stich submitted a lawsuit for filing, similar to what he filed in the New York courts. The federal courts refused to file the papers, stating that a prior order by U.S. District Judge Stanley Sporkin forever barred Stich from filing any papers in any federal courts. Sporkin was the former CIA legal counsel during the numerous corrupt activities of CIA personnel during the 1980s, including the massive drug smuggling.
Continuing Legal Attacks Using
Possible Wife Murderer as Straw Man
In 2001, after stripping the former federal agent of all his assets, and finding that Stich continued to make known to the public the ongoing criminal activities, sham legal actions were again taken to seize the books, Defrauding America, Drugging America, and Unfriendly Skies. Over 50 lawyers and law firms, and the usual California and federal judge involvement, protected the South Carolina law firm that had connections to the CIA.
That legal scheme used a possible wife murderer as the straw man to file the sham action. The action was filed in a remote South Carolina court known for its judicial corruption, and far enough away to where Stich would not have the funds to prepare a defense, even though the defense would have been meaningless of light of the culture of corruption in the legal fraternity, especially in small town courts.
That action was filed shortly after Stich made a final attempt to report the corruption that would shortly be responsible for the conditions enabling four groups of terrorists to hijack four airliners on September 11, 2001.
Index of legal papers involved in that recent scheme to obstruct justice.
National Tragedies Made Possible
By Lawyers and Judges as Enablers
All forms of human tragedies have been inflicted upon the people of the United States from the corruption discovered by the people behind this site−and made possible by enablers in and out of government. The below pictures are only a sampling of the consequences from the documented corruption that are able to be portrayed graphically. The tragedies in other areas resulting from the corruption, cover-ups, and public indifference, are not shown here.
United Airlines crash into New York City, the world's worst at that time. Withheld from the Amererica public were the reports by federal safety inspectors-investigators showing a continuing pattern of corruption, fraud, criminal alteration of major government required records−and the standard abuse of those few inspectors attempting to require the airline management to comply with industry standards and clear requirements of federal aviation safety requirements−and FAA management to require compliance. None of the guilty, the enablers, to these and the continuing fraud-related crashes ever were held accountable for the hundreds of deaths that they enabled to occur.
Laws Violated During
Parallel Legal and Judicial Schemes
The initial violations of laws and constitutional protections were in the California courts as the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross (San Francisco) filed a sham lawsuit against former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to halt his exposure by stripping him of the $10 million in assets that funded his "foolish" activities. This is where large numbers of California judges became criminally implicated in the various schemes seeking to block the reporting of the tragedy-related criminal activities.
When Stich exercised federal remedies in federal courts that were specifically provided for any one of the repeated multiple violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, further laws were violated.
As the original scheme ballooned out of control, it became necessary to repeatedly violated every single one of the many procedural due process rights in California and federal courts. WILL BE UPLOADED SHORTLY.
The massive violations of California and federal laws and constitutional protections arising in the various parallel legal schemes to halt the exposure actions also violated criminal statutes relating to obstruction of justice.
Lawsuits Reporting Criminal
Activities and Civil Rights Violations
Lawsuit filed in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada, that details the pattern of the various schemes to block exposing criminal activities involving key people in government. April 24, 2000. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
Highlights of the lawsuit.
Partial list of various lawsuits.
Another list of various lawsuits.
Partial list of legal filings and submissions to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Partial list of letters to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, and personal letter back from Justice White.
Implications of the various lawsuits. The felony actions of federal judges in response to the filing of the lawsuits seeking to report the criminal activities does not depend upon whether the allegations were correct (they were). The criminal acts arose and continue to arise from (a) the refusal to receive the information that the judges must receive as part of their administrative duties as federal judges, as provided by the federal crime reporting statute. Further, the fact that Stich was a former federal agent, and other former federal agents were offering their testimony and evidence, made the probability of the information being accurate even greater. Further, the catastrophic consequences if any single one of the multiple areas of corruption was true, barred cavalierly ignoring the information.
Further, the misuse of the federal courts and the power in the hands of federal judges to retaliate against a former federal agent for seeking to report the criminal activities were clearly federal crimes.
Letters Reporting Corruption
And Its Consequences
The following are a partial list of letters that former federal agent Rodney Stich wrote, starting while he was still with government, seeking to report corrupt, criminal, and even subversive activities, that were continually resulting in major tragedies, deaths, and harm to national security. Not a single meaningful response was ever received!
List showing a sampling of letters, which will be expanded as time permits.
List showing a sampling of letters to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. These letters, and the filings that were submitted to the Justices, made them fully aware of the extent of the corruption in government offices since approximately 1978, and continuing to this date.
List showing a sampling of letters to members of Congress.
List showing a sampling of letters to media people.
List showing a sampling of letters to lawyers.
List showing a sampling of letters to White House personnel.
List showing a sampling of letters to FBI-DOJ personnel.
Complicity by Federal Judges
And Supreme Court Justices
Thumbnail description of the judicial corruption by federal judges, both in obstructing
justice, and in the parallel sham legal attempts to stop a former federal agent from continuing his exposure activities.
Another list showing the judicial sequence.
Brief history of the judicial corruption, obstruction of justice, retaliation, and parallel legal schemes.
Tactics by federal judges to cover up for corrupt and criminal activities that were continuing to inflict great and catastrophic harm upon the United States and its people.
The criminal misuse of federal courts and judicial positions, retaliating against a former federal agent, in efforts to halt the exposure of the criminal and even subversive activities implicating people in key government positions.
Years of cover-ups by Supreme Court Justices, who aided and abetted the underlying criminal activities and the felony cover-ups by federal judges over whom the Justices have supervisory responsibilitiesand vicarious liability.
The criminal acts arising from the retaliation for attempting to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, and the criminal acts arising from retaliation for exercising federal defenses against the massive civil rights violations associated with the parallel legal efforts to halt Stich's exposure activities.
Other criminal statutes that made the judicial acts repeated felonies.
Obstructing justice statutes. Federal judges were repeatedly guilty of these crimes, for which they were not only not immune, but guilty of greater offenses because of their position of trust.
Sampling of letters sent to federal judges and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Sample list of federal lawsuits seeking to report the criminal activities that Stich and a group of other former government agents had discovered during their professional official duties.
One of the Supreme Court Justices involved with the cover-ups was Supreme Court Justice Anthony. Between the time that he was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the date that he left his position as an appellate judge on the 9th Circuit at San Francisco, Stich filed a petition for an emergency writ with Kennedy. (December 27, 1988) (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) That petition raised the following issues:
Stich sought to report to a federal judge under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute the criminal activities that he and several other former government agents had discovered in government offices as part of their professional and official duties.
Federal judges repeatedly blocked the reports, constituting criminal acts, with catastrophic and deadly consequences arising from the misconduct.
Federal judges and DOJ prosecutors had charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for attempting to report the crimes, and for exercising federal defenses against the parallel legal schemes that violated large numbers of federally protected rights.
Stich was sentenced to go to prison, and sought a stay of that order.
Kennedy denied the request for relief, thereby aiding and abetting the continuation of the criminal acts; the judicial cover-ups of such criminal acts; the misuse of federal courts to retaliate against a person for attempting to make such reports; and for seeking to halt the great personal and financial harm arising from the combination of retaliation and denial of due process. Kennedy was therefore complicit in the tragedies arising from the continuation of the corrupt and criminal acts. That would include the 3,000 deaths on 9/11 that was made possible by the corruption in the government's aviation safety offices (primary cause of the hijackings) and in the FBI and CIA (where the secondary area of blame existed, affecting their ability or willingness to detect the hijacking scheme.
Some years later, in 2006, Justice Kennedy wrote the leading decision that held that government officials could retaliate against a federal employee for filing a required report that reported corrupt and criminal acts. That was the Ceballos decision.
Laws Violated By
Blocking Reports of Criminal Activities
The initial violations of laws and constitutional protections were in the California courts as the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross (San Francisco) filed a sham lawsuit against former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to halt his exposure by stripping him of the $10 million in assets that funded his "foolish" activities. This is where large numbers of California judges became criminally implicated in the various schemes seeking to block the reporting of the tragedy-related criminal activities.
When Stich exercised federal remedies in federal courts that were specifically provided for any one of the repeated multiple violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, further laws were violated.
As the original scheme ballooned out of control, it became necessary to repeatedly violated every single one of the many procedural due process rights in California and federal courts. WILL BE UPLOADED SHORTLY.
The massive violations of California and federal laws and constitutional protections arising in the various parallel legal schemes to halt the exposure actions also violated criminal statutes relating to obstruction of justice.
Lawsuits Reporting Criminal Activities
Lawsuit filed in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada, that details the pattern of the various schemes to block exposing criminal activities involving key people in government. April 24, 2000. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
Highlights of the lawsuit.
Partial list of various lawsuits.
Another list of various lawsuits.
Partial list of legal filings and submissions to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
Partial list of letters to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, and personal letter back from Justice White.
Implications of the various lawsuits. The felony actions of federal judges in response to the filing of the lawsuits seeking to report the criminal activities does not depend upon whether the allegations were correct (they were). The criminal acts arose and continue to arise from (a) the refusal to receive the information that the judges must receive as part of their administrative duties as federal judges, as provided by the federal crime reporting statute. Further, the fact that Stich was a former federal agent, and other former federal agents were offering their testimony and evidence, made the probability of the information being accurate even greater. Further, the catastrophic consequences if any single one of the multiple areas of corruption was true, barred cavalierly ignoring the information.
Further, the misuse of the federal courts and the power in the hands of federal judges to retaliate against a former federal agent for seeking to report the criminal activities were clearly federal crimes.
Various Parallel Legal Schemes Blocking Reports
There were various legal schemes seeking to halt Stich's ability to continue reporting and exposing the criminal activities, which parallel the obstruction of justice tactics by federal judges, and involved the same judges.
The initial scheme was started by the San Francisco CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross and several of their lawyers. That scheme is described in a lawsuit filed in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada. April 24, 2000. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
Several intermediate legal schemes were filed by lawyers and law firms, which are not being described at this time.
One of the last legal schemes was filed by the South Carolina law firm of Smith and Collins. The goal was to seize the books, Defrauding America, Drugging America, and Unfriendly Skies. Although it was started by a South Carolina law firm and lawyers, California judges would against join the scheme in which they were implicated with the CIA-front law firm years earlier. A description of the lawsuit and how California judges stripped Stich of every protection as they did with the prior CIA-front law firm is detailed in a lawsuit filed by Stich in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada, seeking relief.
Today, in his 80s, stripped of his multi-million assets, and the absence of any assets, Stich is judgment-proof. He will go to his grave stripped of the legal and constitutional protections, stripped of the assets from years of hard work. And for what!
The little-publicized nationwide corruption in the bankruptcy courts, that strips the life assets from countless numbers of people who exercise the statutory protections of Chapter 11 (or who are forced into bankruptcy, sometimes by covert CIA personnel.)
The little-publicized nationwide corruption in the bankruptcy courts, that strips the life assets from countless numbers of people who exercise the statutory protections of Chapter 11 (or who are forced into bankruptcy, sometimes by covert CIA personnel.)
Lawyers and Judges in Joint
Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice
Laws violated by California judges in collaboration with CIA-front law firm.
California judges
and lawyers directly implicated.
Initial Legal and Judicial
Obstruction of Justice Tactics
Legal actions to obstruct justice. Massive legal actions taken during a 20-year period seeking, obstructing justice, by misusing the courts to inflict great harm upon a former federal agent.
Conduct by California judges meeting legal criteria for
racketeering enterprise:
Complicity of California attorney general
Lockyer.
Laws violated by California judges in collaboration with CIA-front law firm.
California judges
and lawyers directly implicated.
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/tools_to_fight_judicial_corruption.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/tool_to_expose_judicial_corruption.doc
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/tools_to_fight_judicial_corruption.html
Criminal acts arising out of civil rights violations:
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/criminal_civil_rights_violations.html
Lawsuits
Against Those Involved In
Blocking Reports of High-Level Corruption
Lawsuit filed against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on the basis of their cover-ups, and made primarily to make a government record of the charges and the defendant Justices' responses.
Lawsuit against members of Congress
filed in the federal courts at Washington.
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_congress_dca.html
Lawsuit filed against several media sources on the basis of their cover-ups.
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_media_san_jose.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_supreme_court_justices.html
Lawsuit against members of
congress filed in the Reno,
Nevada federal courts.
Legal index. http://www.defraudingamerica.com/legal_index.html
Lawyers and Judges in Parallel
Schemes
To Halt Exposure of High-Level Corruption
Twenty-plus years of continuous obstruction of justice tactics by over 50 lawyers, law firms, and judges, seeking to halt the exposure of corruption.
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuits_to_obstruct_justice.html
Involvement of additional lawyers and
law firms in the obstruction of justice tactics,
starting in 2001.
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/gratzer_index.html
Additional lawyers and law firms
involved in the obstruction of justice starting in 2001.
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/guerrini_index.html
Index to the involvement of lawyers and judges in the obstruction of justice
tactics.
Legal Index to
judicial corruption and the tragedies arising from the corruption.
Sequence of judges involvement in 40 years of obstruction of justice tactics.
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/judicial_sequence.html
History of lawyers obstructing justice
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawyers_obstructing_justice.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/letter_responding_to_aclu_coverup_mar27_2000.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/letter_responding_to_aclu_coverup_mar28_2000.html
Judicial sequence:
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/judicial_sequence.html
Sequence of judicial tactics to obstruct justice:
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sequence_legal.html
Highlights of judicial acts:
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sequence_highlights.html
Partial list of lawsuits filed by former federal agents, seeking to circumvent the standard cover-ups in government, and report the crimes to federal judges under the federal crime reporting statute.
www.defraudingamerica.com/list_of_filings_supreme_court.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/list_supreme_court_filings.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/lawyer_corruption.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/list_of_files_legal
www.defraudingamerica.com/lying_politicians.html
Also lawsuit list.
Bankruptcy Court Corruption
Another Tentacle of Endemic Corruption
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/bankruptcy_court_corruption.html
Supreme Court Justices' Complicity
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_involvement.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_conduct_implications.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_legal_submissions.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_kennedy_complicity.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_against_whistleblowers.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_supervisory_responsibilities.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/letter_list_supreme_court.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/food_for_thought_15_ceballos_ramifications_tragedies.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/food_for_thought_15_ceballos.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/food_for_thought_15_recover_part.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/food_for_thought_15_supreme_court_ceballos.html
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/food_for_thought_15_supreme_court_ceballos10.html
Justices of U.S. Supreme Court
And Years of Cover-Up
Complicity
This section deals with the documented repeated complicity of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. The seriousness of their conduct includes the fact that:
www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_conduct_implications.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_index.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_kennedy_complicity.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_submissions.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_responsibilities.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/vicarious_liability.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/food_for_thought_supreme_court_justices.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_supreme_court_justices.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/list_of_filings_supreme_court.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/list_supreme_court_filings.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/corruption_supreme_court_justices.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/void_orders.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/legal_submissions_supreme_court.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/kennedy_complicity.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/ceballos_decision.html
Letter from Supreme Court Justice White to Rodney Stich. (JPG format)
www.defraudingamerica.com/friedman_scheme.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/sham_lawsuit.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/friedman_lawyers.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/california_cia_related_lawsuit.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/gratzer_index.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/legal_gratzer_index.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/guerrini_index.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/guerrini_tactics.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/legal_guerrini_latest.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/latest_legal_tactics_guerrini.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/california_judges_and_lawyers_implicated.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/california_law.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/civil_rights_violations.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/judges_lawyers_implicated.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/california_as_racketeering_enterprise.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/laws_violated_by_california_judges.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/violations_by_california_judges.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/legal_fraternity_harassment.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/lawyers_judges_conspiracies_tragedies.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/lawyer_judges_corruption.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/lawyers_obstructing_justice.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/legal_index.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/divorce_judgment_recognition.html
www.defraudingamerica.com/check_bogus.html
Several of the Not-For-Profit Books Related
To Widespread Internal Corruption
All of the books are available at amazon.com, in print and on the Kindle, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich
Sampling of early books reviews
Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.
