Index of Letters

This site lists a sampling of letters relating to documented corrupt and criminal activities in key judicial and government offices, and the pattern of cover-ups. They were sent to members of Congress, Justice Department officials, Supreme Court Justices,  and show the totality of the cover-ups and obstruction of justice related to criminal and even subversive activities in certain government offices, most of which continue to this day, inflicting great harm upon national interests and upon the lives of many people. 

The significance of these letters is that they show a culture throughout government that created conditions that insured the success of the September 11 terrorists, and through the post-September 11 cover-ups and disinformation, insures the success of future terrorist attacks. They show that foreign terrorists are only one source of great harm to the United States and its people, while another source is in the form of a Trojan horse that defrauds the American people, and in many cases, constitutes a great threat and source of harm than foreign terrorists. 

Note: the letters are in either MS Word or Adobe PDF formats.

Letters relating to events of September 11, 2001

The success of 19 hijackers on September 11, 2001, that led to the brutal death of 3,000 people, was due far more to serious misconduct in the government's air safety functions that due to any "intelligence failure." The following are a few of the warning letters written before the September 11, 2001, events which detailed the serious problems in the federal air safety agencies, the FBI and other Justice Department divisions, the federal courts, where federal judges engaged in criminal acts to block the reporting of widespread corruption in government offices, and the endemic cover-ups and obstruction of justice by members of Congress. It is obvious from these letters that the success of the four groups of hijackers on September 11, 2001, were due to the corrupt and criminal acts that former federal air safety inspector Rodney Stich detailed in these letters. These documented felonies, by key people in the three branches of government, reveal that the 3,000 deaths on September 11 were made possible by far more than an "intelligence failure." The present cover-up of these matters greatly increases the success rate of subsequent terrorists and encourages them to carry out their schemes.

Sampling of Letters by Former Federal Air Safety Agent

Letters sent to every justice of the U.S. Supreme Court with copies to members of Congress (February 6, 2003), law firms representing relatives of 9/11 aviation catastrophe, media members, and others, putting them on notice of documented corruption that enabled the events of 9/11 to occur. The charges are of such gravity encompassing large numbers of U.S. leaders that the the information will surely be kept from the public. These long-documented cover-ups insures that the American public will continue to suffer the consequences, just as they have done for many years. (MS Word) The charges are so serious, made me Stich and other former government agents, and the consequences on national security and other major national interests, are of such grave consequences that it would be irresponsible for anyone failing to conduct an immediate public investigation.

Letters to U.S. district court judge Michael B. Mukasey, (New York City) with copies to numerous members of Congress (November 2, 2002) relating to the judicial and other cover-ups of the corruption in government that played key roles in the success of the 19 terrorist hijackers on September 11, 2001. Letter describes some of the corruption that enabled the 19 hijackers to succeed, the corruption that made many prior hijackings and air disasters occur, corruption that continues other non-publicized tragedies, and corruption that will repeatedly insure other deja vu tragedies. (MS Word)

Letter to Senator John McCain (May 24, 2002) reporting corruption in certain government offices that enabled terrorists to hijack four airliners on 9/11 (and other areas of corruption with decades of great harm upon America's people. (MS Word)

Letter to Senator Joseph Lieberman (May 22, 2002) relating to his recent television comments and the events of September 11. (MS Word)

Letter to President George Bush (May 17, 2002) relating to documented misconduct in his area of oversight responsibilities that made September 11 possible and which were continuing to exist. (MS Word)

Letter to President George Bush (April 7, 2001) concerning the non-response to the March 1, 2001 letter that made serious charges of corrupt and criminal activities falling under the responsibilities of his administration, and involving people in his administration. These charges included those that made possible the success of prior terrorist hijackings involving people in air safety government positions, in the Justice Department, and in the federal courts. It didn't require a rocket scientist to understand that sooner or later terrorists would take advantage of these weaknesses, which they did do on September 11, 2001. The writer of the letter had 60 years of sophisticated aviation background, was a former federal air safety inspector in a key air safety position, and was thoroughly qualified to make the statements that he made in that letter. President Bush's cover-up of these matters than made possible the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorists. Covering up for his own duplicity, and that of U.S. leaders, he praised everyone in sight, and dispensed in wholesale fashion the "hero" label.  (MS Word)

Letter to NTSB Chairman Jim Hall, March 13, 1997, bringing to his attention to role of the CIA and Justice Department in making it possible for terrorists to acquire surface-to-air missiles shortly before the downing of TWA Flight 800 This information, which was based on confidential data obtained by Stich from a CIA source who was directly involved in the missile negotiations, played a major role in the investigation of the missile-downing of TWA Flight 800. No response from Hall, no interest, typical of what Stich had discovered of the NTSB while he was a federal air safety investigator. Hall continued his role in the unprecedented cover-up and misinformation relating to the TWA Flight 800 disaster. (MS Word)

President George Bush, March 1, 2001. This letter reported criminal activities in key government offices that a group of present and former federal agents had discovered, and the misuse of government offices to retaliate against the agents. No response. After the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings, made possible by the matters brought to his attention, he then engaged in knee-jerk reactions that will lead to more deaths and even worse consequences for the United States. His understanding of realities is reflected by his bizarre statement, "The terrorists hate us because we are so good." Another example of his leadership is his statement that he is authorizing the funding of a system to prevent airline pilots maintaining control of the airliners and transferring control to someone on the ground. Another bizarre example of his competence and judgment is his authorizing the military to shoot down an airliner, that may have 300 to 400 people on board, if someone on the ground thinks the aircraft may be hijacked, and thinks it may be flown into a  prominent building. With this type of responsibility and leadership, everyone better start praying and hope there is a God! (MS Word)

Attorney General John Ashcroft, February 29, 2001. The letter reported what Stich and other former federal agents had discovered that included a pattern of documented corruption in key government offices, the retaliation against government agents who attempt to report the corrupt activities, and the harm inflicted upon the United States by this misconduct. No response. That letter, sent prior to the September 11, 2001, hijackings, warned of the internal FAA corruption that insured the success of the September 11 terrorist hijackings. If the attorney general of the United States had responded and reacted to that letter, it is highly possible that corrective actions could have been taken to require the simple and obvious corrective actions that would have prevented the success of the September 11 hijackings. (MS Word)

Louis J. Freeh, Director, FBI, February 26, 2001. Reported hard-core civil rights violations in federal courts, federal judges blocking reports of criminal activities, judicial retaliation for exercising the responsibility to make such reports, and of drug smuggling by people acting under government cover. No response. That letter provided detailed information, similar to that given to U.S. Attorney General John  Ashcroft, about corrupt activities implicating people in government positions that were aiding and abetting terrorist activities. As with the letters sent to other federal personnel, including Ashcroft, actions could have been taken to have prevented the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackers. Further, covering up for the misconduct stated in those letters constitute obstruction of justice. (MS Word)

Letter sent to FBI agent Daley (July 30, 1996), making a record of the fact that Stich offered to provide the FBI with information on the missiles and that the FBI showed no interest in receiving the information. Instead, the FBI agents warned him to remain quiet about the matter. No response denying what was stated in that letter. (MS Word)

Letters sent to Senator Arlen Specter (October 20, 1995) and every members of the Senate and House Intelligence Committees, consisting of three pages of details, making reference to statements and documentation that Stich obtained from one of his CIA sources, describing the imminent transfer of up to 100 SAM missiles to Afghan terrorists.  No response, despite the enormous human tragedies arising from the acquisition of these missiles by terrorists. (MS Word)

It is possible that one or more of these missiles could have been involved in the downing of TWA Flight 800 and one possible reason for the bizarre NTSB and FBI cover-ups. Another significance is that these missiles can be used at any time to inflict havoc by shooting down, or threatening to shoot down, commercial aircraft. No response from any of the members of the House and Senate intelligence committees.

 Names of other members of the Senate and House intelligence committees who did not respond to the urgent warning letters of SAM missiles being transferred to Afghan terrorists.

Similar warning letters relating to misconduct related to a continuing series of fatal airline crashes were first sent to these key government positions while Rodney Stich was a federal air safety inspector responsible for air safety at the most senior program for the world's largest airline at that time (United Airlines). These letters were sent while the airline was experiencing repeated air disasters due to documented misconduct at the airline and within the Federal Aviation Administration. Among these air disasters was the world's worst, a DC-8 crash into New York City, which was followed years later by the United Airlines and American Airlines 767s crashing into the World Trade Center. All three of these air disasters were made possible by the documented but unpublicized corruption within the FAA. 

The letters relate to factual matters and not simply opinions. The letters show that the success of the September 11 terrorists was not simply an intelligence failure, but far worse. The significance of these letters is that they state specific areas of corrupt, criminal and even subversive activities, sent by a respected, highly qualified, former federal air safety inspector with dozens of government agents providing him with information. The grave consequences for the United States and the lives of many people, if any single one of the charges are true, required that he be contacted and his evidence and testimony examined. 

The responsibility to do these follow-up actions arises under their oversight responsibilities and under several federal criminal statutes, including the federal crime reporting statute. The total refusal of the recipients to respond strongly indicate that they already knew of part of the charges and that they were joining the practice of covering up. This was how the stage was set for the success of the September 11 terrorist hijackers and for the success of many future terrorist attacks.

A suggestion: send a copy of a particular letter to the member of congress that the letter was originally sent to, and ask that government employee what he or she did in response to it. (In Internet explorer, File, Send, Page by E-mail, and then insert your questions at the top of the letter being forwarded.) If enough people would do this, it is possible that the massive cover-ups can be circumvented. If this is not done, the 3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001, will simply be another blip in a long line of prior fraud related tragedies made possible by the cover-ups. E-mail addresses of members of the House and Senate can be obtained by clicking here. Be advised that the gravity of the misconduct involving the deaths of 3,000 people, and other matters of major national concern, is so great that members of Congress will use various tactics to sidestep the issues. 

Among the areas covered by the letters would be:

Each of the following sampling of letters sent to members of Congress related to matters discovered by government personnel in key insider positions reporting matters of grave national interest, including national security. Many of the letters warned of great personal and financial harm that would occur, and did occur. These consequences did occur, as described in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies and the first edition of Drugging America.

The recipients of these letters, by their cover-ups and obstruction of justice, made possible the infliction of great harm upon the men and women of the United States, including many deaths. Only a few good. Because of their felony involvement through cover-ups and obstruction of justice, they will never allow the people to discover these matters. That is especially true as it relates to who and what form of misconduct played key roles in the deaths of 3,000 people on September 11. The misconduct is far more than an intelligence failure.

Letters Relating to Downing of TWA Flight 800
(Before and After)

  • Missile warning prior to TWA 800 missile attack: This three-page detailed letter was sent by Rodney Stich to Senator Specter and every other member of the Senate and House intelligence committees. The letter was based upon information and documentation provided to Stich by one of his close CIA sources who had been head of a secret CIA financial operation based in Hawaii. Click here to view the letter to Senator Specter dated October 20, 1995. Their failure to respond permitted several dozen, and possibly 100 surface to air missiles to be sold to terrorist groups with a great hatred for the United States. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

     
  • Author's letter to NTSB Chairman Jim Hall, March 13, 1997, bringing to his attention to role of the CIA and Justice Department in making it possible for terrorists to acquire surface-to-air missiles. This information, which was based on confidential data obtained by Stich from a CIA source who was directly involved in the missile negotiations, played a major role in the investigation of the missile-downing of TWA Flight 800. Hall continued his role in the unprecedented cover-up and misinformation relating to the TWA Flight 800 disaster. (MS Word) (Adobe pdf)

    July 30, 1999 letter to FBI agent making a record of providing the FBI information on downing of TWA Flight 800 and FBI warning to me to remain quiet about the information. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letters Warning of Hardcore Misconduct Followed By Deja Vu Tragedies Caused Or Made Possible by the Misconduct, Including the September 11, 2001, Terrorist Acts

The importance of these letters is to show that government insiders, who had information and supporting documentation on hardcore corrupt, criminal, and even subversive activities, sought to provide this information to members of Congress under their congressional responsibilities and under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. By refusing to receive the information, they aided and abetted the criminal activities and the great harm inflicted upon the United States and its people. These crimes are far worse than the offenses for which many men and women have been sent to federal prison for long prison sentences. (In most cases these letters will be posted in reverse order of having been sent, so the most recent letters are at the top of this sampling of letters.)

Letter sent to Senator John McCain, May 24, 2002, with similar copies to Senators Bob Graham, Robert Torricelli, Kay Hutchinson, Joseph Lieberman, Tom Daschle, and others. (MS Word)

Letter sent to President George Bush, May 17, 2002, informing him, again, of the government agents who had previously reported to him corrupt, criminal, and subversive activities that were adversely affecting national security, including matters aiding and abetting terrorist acts from outside the United States, and that these conditions still exist after September 11. Further, that the corrupt conditions directly related to the success of the 9/11 terrorists still existed. Since the writer of that letter was a prominent federal air safety inspector with numerous government sources revealing multiple areas of corruption in government offices, and the gravity of the consequences, refusal to respond would be  most probably due to the fact he already knows of these matters. (MS Word)

Letter sent to Vice President Richard Chaney, May 17, 2002, informing him of the same information sent to President George Bush. with the circle of spin-doctors around President Bush, including Bush himself, Chaney is a refreshing change, but limited to not contradicting President Bush. With such politically-correct "protectors" of national security as Condoleezza Rice and of air safety as FAA Administrator Jane Garvey, the United States desperately needs someone with experience, a level head, and who can speak straight! (MS Word)

Letter sent to Senator Dianne Feinstein, May 5, 2002, reporting criminal activities that Stich and a group of other former government agents had discovered, some of which played a role in insuring the success of the four groups of hijackers on September 11, 2001. (MS Word)

Letter sent to Senator Barbara Boxer, May 5, 2002, reporting the same criminal activities as described in the letter to Senator Feinstein. The intent of the letters was to make a record through the certified mailings that they knew of these serious charges and that they continued their prior cover-ups. Letters from people in key government positions, as held by Stich, with matters of such grave national impact, could not be simply ignored without being guilty of grave misconduct. 

Letter sent to Representative Nancy Pelosi, May 5, 2002, (MS Word) in response to her attempt to give letters to China's visiting vice president complaining of human rights abuses in China. This certified letter was to make another record of her repeated cover-up of both the human rights abuses and the criminal activities in government that the violations were intended to halt.  

Letter sent to FBI Director Robert Mueller, October 18, 2001, detailing the pattern of documented corruption that encouraged and insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. For MS Word, click here.

Letter sent to Attorney General John Ashcroft, October 2, 2001, similar to the letter sent to FBI Director Robert Mueller. For MS Word, click here.

 

Sampling of FBI and Justice Department Letters

Based upon over 40 years of close contact with the various divisions of the U.S. Department of Justice, the people and the mindset by the lawyers that make up these government agencies is by far the most corrupt and dangerous to the men, women, and children of the United States, and to the internal security of America.

Sampling of letters sent to the U.S. Department of Justice reporting various areas of criminal activities in the three branches of government, followed by cover-ups (i.e., obstruction of justice). Does not include letters sent years earlier, while Rodney Stich was a federal air safety inspector, that sought to expose the corruption that played a decisive role in a continuing series of airline crashes, including fatal hijackings that could have been easily halted. They violated their duties as Justice Department employees and under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. 

Justice Department and FBI Hypocrisy

No limit to hypocrisy. On the Internet site for the FBI, www.fbi.gov, there are pages of assurances that the FBI will protect your civil rights. For instance, the FBI's responsibility for investigating civil rights violations is stated in part as follows:

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the primary federal agency responsible for investigating all allegations regarding violations of applicable civil rights laws. These laws are designed to protect the civil rights of all citizens and persons within United States territory. The mission of the FBI's Civil Rights Program is to enforce federal civil rights statutes and to ensure that the protected civil rights of all inhabitants are not abridged. The FBI ... requires each field office to initiate a civil rights investigation whenever information is received from any source not known to be unreliable. ... The FBI has the mission to investigation allegations of civil rights violations pursuant to federal statutes. Final prosecutive authority rests with DOJ's Civil Rights Division.

Letters Reflecting 40 Years of Cover-ups by Members of Congress

Many letters were sent to members of Congress over the years reporting various corrupt and criminal activities that fell within their responsibilities as members of Congress and also under the responsibilities of federal officials, under the federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4) to receive such information and take required actions.

Activist Rodney Stich first reported to members of Congress the deep-seated culture of corruption within the FAA that he discovered as a federal air safety inspector. In later years, as other federal agents provided Stich with information and documentation on other areas of corruption, he sought to report these federal crimes. The criminal activities included drug smuggling into the United States by the CIA and other government entities, corruption in the federal courts, and other matters of major national interest. The following list of letters are in addition to, or a direct link to the letters listed elsewhere.  

Letters to every member of the House and Senate judiciary committees, (April 4, 2001), in response to their non-response to my earlier letters reporting the criminal activities in their areas of oversight responsibilities. The purpose of the letters, and in other instances, was to  make a record that a group of federal agents offered to provide evidence to them of criminal activities in key judicial and other government offices and that they refused to respond. In the event the American public ever discovered the widespread corruption against them by people in control of key government offices, this record of felony cover-ups by members of Congress could be used for their prosecution, imprisonment, and impeachment. (MS Word)

Representative Dan Burton, March 15, 2001. Letter putting him on notice of the documented actions by federal judges blocking the reports to a federal court, under the federal crime reporting statute, of the corrupt and criminal activities that former federal air safety inspector Rodney Stich and his group of other government agents sought to report. These judicial obstruction of justice actions blocked the reporting of corrupt actions that played key roles in the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. The letter to Burton was motivated by his statements on the Fox News O'Reilly show that "we have honesty in government." (MS Word)

Reply letter to Representative Coble, Chairman of House Subcommittee on Courts, February 23, 2001, making a record of his cover-up. (MS Word)

Response from Senator Diane Feinstein, February 15, 2001 to letter sent on February 2, 2001 to all members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. This was her stonewalling response to prior letter informing her of documented criminal activities in Ninth Circuit federal courts and federal judges' blocking the reports of criminal activities which they must receive under the federal crimes reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4). She excused doing nothing on separation of power in the three branches of government, ignoring her oversight responsibilities of the courts and other government operations, and her responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute. She was a member of the oversight committee on the judiciary. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter responding to Senator Feinstein's cover-up (March 1, 2001). The letter chastised the senator for continuing the pattern of cover-ups that has made possible the continuation of the criminal activities in key judicial and other government offices (which included the Federal Aviation Administration). (MS Word)

Representative George Miller, February 9, 2001. Letter sent to Miller who represents the constituencies in Stich's California district concerning the corrupt and criminal acts that Stich and his group of present and former government agents had discovered.  Miller had been covering up, for years, the criminal activities that Stich uncovered, starting with the misconduct that played a key role in many airline crashes. No response. (MS Word)

Representative Tom Delay, February 9, 2001. Stich made reference to Delay's comments about everyone's "right to be heard on ... legal questions." Stich's letter made reference to the criminal contempt of court charges filed against Stich by Justice Department prosecutors and federal judges in retaliation for seeking to report the criminal activities and for exercising federal remedies against the civil rights violations that were part of the scheme to silence him. No response. (MS Word)

Response letter from Representative Howard Coble, Chairman of Subcommittee on Courts, response of February 8, 2001 to Stich's letter. His response to the charges of serious criminal and subversive conduct: "Due to the limited resources of the Committee ...." He had no time to address the serious matters of widespread judicial corruption, subversion of major laws and the Constitution, and criminal activities, but had time for trivial matters, including almost daily raising of funds. This conduct is far worse that simply malfeasance and nonfeasance; these are major federal crimes under the obstruction of justice statutes. The relatives of the 5,000 deaths on September 11, 2001, can thank Coble and the other members of Congress who covered up for the corruption in government that also made many other air tragedies possible. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letters sent to Senator Patrick Leahy, (January 29, 2001), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, and to every member of the senate and house judiciary committees, providing specific information about a pattern of documented corrupt activities in the federal courts involving the Supreme Court justices, the actions by federal judges blocking the reporting of criminal activities, the judicial retaliation for attempting to make such reports, and the concurrent subversion of civil rights by the judges. None responded, included those who professed to the public about protecting due process rights to any citizen--especially if they are minorities (which is a standard congressional race card tactic). (MS Word)

Representative F. James Sensenbrenner, Chairman, House Committee on the Judiciary. January 29, 2001. This letter was sent to every member of the House and Senate judiciary committees. They had oversight responsibilities for the federal judiciary, for which Stich offered documented evidence of widespread corruption in the federal courts. The letter described the documented obstruction of justice by federal judges who blocked the reporting of criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute. Among the federal offenses being cover-up by the federal judges were those that made possible the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackers. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Names of members of the Senate and House judiciary committees who did not respond to letters reporting serious judicial corruption. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Representative Barbara Lee, July 20, 2000. Stich sent a cover letter and copy of Drugging America to her because of the black representatives loudly proclaiming outrage at CIA drug trafficking. No reaction. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Senator Barbara Boxer response, August 30, 1999, acknowledging receipt of the book, Drugging America, which details the drug smuggling by people in key government positions, funding of key politicians by CIA operations, Justice Department personnel blocking federal agents from targeting the drug operations funding terrorist cells in New Jersey and New York--the same ones that bombed the World Trade Center in 1993, funded the plan to place bombs on 11 U.S. airliners department the Far East, and suspected of funding the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter to Senator Barbara Boxer, August 9, 1999, describing the drug trafficking by people in the CIA as revealed by a group of federal agents and other misconduct, including that within the FAA that insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackers. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter sent to Senator Hatch (September 8, 1997) describing the documented corruption in the federal courts that were blocking the reporting of criminal activities and were subverting the laws and Constitution of the United States in a scheme to obstruct justice. No response. The letters offered to provide evidence via the testimony of former federal agents, including the FBI, DEA, Customs, and CIA, including the former heads of secret CIA airlines and financial operations. No response. (MS Word)

Author's letter to Senator Specter warning of surface to air missile attacks upon commercial aircraft, the basis of which was information and documentation received from a friend and former head of a major and secret CIA financial proprietary based in Honolulu. This warning letter, and efforts to reduce the risk of aircraft being shot down, related to approximately 100 missiles offered to the United States that terrorists were seeking to buy. This letter had great significance in the investigation of TWA Flight 800, which has been covered up. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Author's letter to Senator Orrin Hatch, September 8, 1997. The significance of this letter is that it offered Senator Hatch evidence from the coalition of government agents to prove the existence of CIA, DEA and military drug trafficking into the United States and the cover-up of this information by federal judges and Supreme Court justices. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
 

Another list of letters sent to members of Congress, reporting corrupt and criminal activities for which they had responsibilities under their congressional duties and under the federal crime reporting statute. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
 

Earlier letters showing congressional cover-ups and obstruction of justice go back to 1964, associated with a series of very brutal airline disasters, including a United Airlines DC-8 that crashed into New York City, which was the world's worst air disaster at that time. The next worst aviation disaster also included a United Airlines crash into the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001. There are scandalous connections between the two tragedies that reveal Americans have more than a single set of adversaries.

Complicity by Federal Judges and Supreme Court Justices

Here lies an area of unpublicized corruption that is totally without any publicity, and which plays a role in the continuation of many tragedies upon the people, and grave harm to national interests. The 3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001, probably could not have happened if the documented cover-ups, and worse crimes, by federal judges had not occurred.

The federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, specifically requires that anyone knowing of a federal crime must promptly report it to a federal judge (or other federal officer--including members of Congress and Justice Department personnel), and that they must receive the information or them themselves are guilty of the crime of misprision of felony. Since Justice Department personnel and members of Congress refused to receive the information, Stich attempted to report to a federal court the information and evidence of criminal activities that he and his large group of government agents had discovered as part of their official government duties. ,

Stich's early attempts in the late 1970s and early 1980s related to the corruption in the Federal Aviation Administration that was playing a continuing role in a series of fatal airline crashes and the cover-ups of these federal crimes. 

Starting in 1986, he again attempted to report additional areas of criminal activities to a federal court, and again encountered repeated obstruction of justice by federal judges at every level, including by the Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. This obstruction of justice, of matters inflicting great harm upon the people and upon major national interests, including national security, showed the widespread felony obstruction of justice throughout the three branches of the federal government. 

The attempts to report these criminal activities to a federal judge were through federal lawsuits, appeals, and petitions to the Supreme Court, and further through letters to Supreme Court Justices. A few of the letters and petitions are shown at this Internet site. It is important to understand the gravity of this judicial cover-up.

 

Letters and Petitions to Supreme Court Justices

List of of letters sent to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, reporting corruption among federal judges that involved felony cover-ups and blocking of reporting of criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute; the corruption in the Chapter 11 courts; the pattern of hard-core civil and constitutional violations perpetrated as part of the judicial efforts to block the reporting of the criminal activities in the three branches of government. As with all recipients of these letters, cover-ups are felonies under federal criminal statutes.

One petition detailed how the CIA-front law firm misused the legal process to halt the exposure of these federal crimes, and how federal judges aided and abetted the scheme through massive and documented misuse of the courts. The petition and related legal filings detail the massive and repeated violations of state and federal laws by the CIA-front law firm, a group of California judges, and finally by federal judges. Stich submitted a petition for extraordinary writ to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on May 2, 2002, putting him on notice of these criminal activities, on notice of the heavy and documented involvement of federal judges in these crimes, and the relationship to the events of September 11, 2001.  (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letters sent to Chief Justice Rehnquist and each of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States (April 11, 2001).  (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) 

Letter to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (February 15, 2001), describing the corruption in the lower federal courts, their obstruction of justice tactics, their felony retaliation against the former federal agent seeking to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute. This letter was a follow-up to an emergency petition submitted to Justice Thomas. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, February 15, 2001 Petition for emergency relief. The purpose of this petition was to report to a federal court the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4), to report the obstruction of justice actions by federal judges who were blocking the reporting of federal crimes to a federal court, and to report the retaliation by federal judges for attempting to make these reports. These judicial acts played a role in the misconduct that insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) 

Petition for emergency relief February 8, 2001 to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. (PetMS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, January 2, 2001. The letter described documented misconduct by federal judges, including their blocking of reports of criminal activities, retaliating against the former federal agent for seeking to report the criminal activities, and the civil rights violations that were part of the scheme initiated by a CIA related law firm in San Francisco (Friedman, Sloan and Ross) to block Stich's reporting of the criminal activities Stich discovered within the FAA and other government offices. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

 U.S. Supreme Court Petition for writ of certiorari, November 10, 2000. This petition described the pattern by federal judges of blocking the reports of criminal activities that amounted to obstruction of justice, the civil rights violations that were part of the scheme to block these reports, and other violations. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter to Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, March 16, 2000, with similar information. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

U.S. District Judge Milton Schwartz, June 19, 1998. Stich made reference to his role in blocking the reports of criminal activities and his role in the scheme initiated by the CIA-front law firm. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter to the clerk of the U.S. Supreme Court, clerk, William K. Sutter, (August 23, 1997) making reference to his role in fraudulently refusing to file a petition for writ of certiorari which would have made a judicial record of certain major segments of the judicial and other corruption which Stich and his group of government agents had discovered, including the pattern of CIA drug trafficking into the United States, the Justice Department retaliation against Stich and his coalition for seeking to report these criminal acts, and the role of federal judges in these actions. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

An August 1997 petition to the United States Supreme Court reported the corruption relating to a series of prior airline crashes and the judicial and Justice Department actions to block these reports, was submitted to the Court in August 1997.  (MS Word)(Adobe PDF) (html)

March 4, 1991, Petition for emergency relief to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking relief from continuation of criminal contempt of court charges against him for attempting to report criminal activities to a federal court under the federal crime reporting statute (and for exercising federal due process remedies against record-setting violations of state and federal laws initiated by a CIA-front law firm). (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

  One Highly Respected Supreme Court Justice Implied Gravity Of Charges

Letter from U.S. Supreme Court justice Byron R. White (October 28, 1991) in response to report of corrupt activities in government and in the federal courts, and stating that as a single justice--without the cooperation of others--"I can be of no help to you." He implied that if the other Justices had supported him, he could have taken corrective actions. (Adobe PDF)

List of other federal filings and letters to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, for those who are extra serious in discovering the extent of the corruption in federal courts that have brought us to the September 11, 2001, consequences, and probably, under the same leadership, far worse consequences!

Federal lawsuits related to corruption within the FAA and NTSB, filed by former federal air safety inspector offering evidence of federal crimes relating to series of fatal airline crashes and the criminal cover-ups. Other federal lawsuits relating to corrupt federal judges obstructing justice and retaliating against government whistleblowers can be found by clicking here. The judicial cover-ups and obstruction of justice that had blocked former federal agent Rodney Stich from reporting the culture of corruption in government continued, which continued to allow the misconduct and the consequences to continue, including the September 11, 2001, tragedies associated with FAA problems. When fully understood, the evidence of complicity by wide segments of the federal judiciary, including Supreme Court Justices, becomes clear, showing the endemic extent of the adversaries faced by the American public.

The criminal activities that were being covered up included those affecting aviation and protections against terrorism. September 11, 2001, terrorist acts proved again the consequences of these corrupt and criminal acts and the duplicity of cover-ups that involve virtually every government and non-government check and balance. The repeated cover-ups after September 11 insures that the public will continue to pay the consequences, and this time, the consequences will be more severe than those occurring on September 11. 

Supreme Court Justices had been made aware, since the 1970s, of the corrupt and criminal activities in key government offices, especially within the Federal Aviation Administration. The Justices had been repeatedly notified of the corrupt, criminal, and civil rights violations perpetrators by federal judges concurrent with the judicial acts blocking the reporting of criminal activities to a federal court as required by the federal crime reporting statute. (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4).  These were extremely serious matters that had national implications, as was seen on September 11, 2001.

Note: when all of the legal filings, including the sham actions taken by a CIA-front law firm, are understood, there is a possibility that the judicial retaliation against former federal agent Rodney Stich came from within the federal court system. In his 1980 second edition of Unfriendly Skies, he described the judicial cover-ups in his earlier lawsuits, and the continuation of the crashes and deaths from the judicial cover-ups. There is no direct evidence, only circumstantial evidence. It is hard to believe that anyone in the judicial system would start such a scheme, but it is an interesting thought.

There is overwhelming evidence in federal court filings of a massive corruption in the federal courts. There is clear evidence of repeated judicial retaliation and blocking of reports of criminal and subversive activities--and numerous tragedies in the areas of corruption that were blocked.

Federal Lawsuit Detailing Legal Scheme to
Halt Exposure of High Level Criminal Activities

Details of how a CIA-front law firm conspired with federal judges to block the reporting of hardcore criminal and subversive activities, much of which are detailed in the third editions of Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America, and in a federal lawsuit filed in the U.S. district court at Reno, Nevada.  (MS Word)

Continuing Judicial Corruption Despite Their Key Role In September 11, 2001 Events 

Major federal causes of actions were stated in that Reno lawsuit for which federal law barred dismissal. Failure to dismiss that lawsuit risked:

  • Exposing the criminal and subversive activities that Stich and his group of government agents sought to report.

  • Exposing the CIA front law firm and possibly the powerful source in government that engineered the scheme.

  • Exposing the participants in the scheme, including the CIA-front law firm, numerous California judges, numerous federal district and appellate judges and all of the Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court.

Repeating Prior Obstruction Of Justice and Total Due Process Violations

    On February 12, 2002, U.S. District Judge Reed at Reno, Nevada, unlawfully and unconstitutionally dismissed every defendant (California judges, federal judges, lawyers, and law firms), dismissed every non-defendant federal cause of actions filed under the Declaratory Judgment Act and void judgment doctrine. Further, he refused to receive the reports and evidence of the criminal activities that Stich and his group of government agents sought to report. Stich then filed a timely notice of appeal for which the fees were paid.

Expanding Complicity by Federal Appellate Judges

 On April 12, 2002, Ninth Circuit appellate judges James R. Browning, Ronald M. Gould and Andrew J. Kleinfeld filed an order barring Stich from filing appeal briefs on the holding that a 1994 appellate court order forever barred Stich from the appellate court. By this unlawful and unconstitutional denial of due process, the appellate judges continued their prior obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting the subversive of the laws and Constitution of the United States, and provided further proof of the extent of the corruption in the federal government.

Stich responded by filing a petition for extraordinary relief with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on May 2, 2001, expecting him to continue the prior involving of the Supreme Court Justices in these multiple and major crimes against the United States. (MS Word)

For an understanding of the massive violations of federal law and constitutional protections by the Reno district judge and Ninth Circuit appellate judges, look at the draft of the appeal brief that Stich was prepared to file in the appellate court. (MS Word)

In the process of blocking the reporting of major crimes, federal judges committed numerous federal crimes.

These were very serious offenses! By corrupting the judicial process, federal judges, up to and including the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, played key roles in not only the cover-ups of criminal activities in government, but subverted the security of the United States by insuring the success of the terrorists. 

Judicial Cover-Ups Enabling 9/11 Hijackings to Occur

An examination of the sampling of letters and legal filings will show where the former federal inspector repeatedly reported the criminal activities and their cover-ups, especially those criminal activities that insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorists. They show the following:

  • Attempt to report to them the criminal activities and provide evidence that the federal crime reporting statute requires that they receive. Under the clear wording of the federal crime reporting statute, any federal judge--including the Supreme Court Justices--are required to receive as part of their administrative duties (as distinct from their judicial duties) reports and evidence offered to the court concerning federal crimes. These corrupt and criminal activities included evidence of wrongdoings that insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorists, and could very probably have encouraged them to initiate their plans.

  • Report to the Supreme Court Justices the obstruction of justice by federal judges over whom they have supervisory responsibilities.

  • Report to the Supreme Court justices the record-setting civil rights violations perpetrated against the former federal agent as part of the tactics to block the reporting of the serious corrupt and criminal activities. It is a federal crime to interfere with or inflict harm upon a federal agent or former federal agent, or witness, for attempting to report criminal activities.

  • Seek to have the Supreme Court Justices perform their mandatory duties, which included ordering a halt to the documented record-setting violations of civil rights and corrupt misuse of federal courts. If any one of the Justices had perform their duty--instead of aiding and abetting the wrongful acts--the September 11, 2001, terrorism probably would not have occurred, not the catastrophic collateral damage, the extent of which may be beyond the comprehension of anyone. 

  • The corrupt and criminal activities occurring in the Federal Aviation Administration are detailed in the third edition of Unfriendly Skies, are found in sequestered FAA hearing records, detailed in various federal filings by Stich, and include such matters as the following:

    • Repeated refusal by FAA management to take mandatory corrective actions on major air safety problems and air safety violations, even though a continuing series of fatal airline crashes were occurring. This would also include refusal to order the simple and obvious corrective actions (secure doors and absence of keys to the cockpit) that inspectors reported and which were urgently needed as shown by the repeated fatal hijackings occurring for the past 40 years.

    • FAA management ordering inspectors not to report serious safety problems and safety violations.

    • FAA management destroying official air safety reports filed by federal air safety inspectors to avoid unfavorable comments when the uncorrected safety problems result in the expected airline crashes.

    • Retaliating against federal air safety inspectors when they persist in making the reports or attempt to take corrective actions required by federal law. 

    • Inspectors who were competent, and who attempted to carry out their federal air safety responsibilities, were threatened by key personnel at United Airlines and within the FAA. The immediate consequences of this dual threat to inspectors were the repeated crashes from 1958 through 1978 due to these problems. The long-term effect was to aid and abet the internal FAA corruption that blocked corrective actions for obvious air safety problems, including the hijacking problems that could have been easily prevented. Ironically, United Airlines personnel's misconduct had a distant relationship to the successful terrorist hijackings of September 11, 2001, which resulted in two United Airlines aircraft being hijacked--and which could have been prevented if United Airlines personnel had not blocked and threatened federal air safety inspectors who sought to correct these problems--including the successful takeover of aircraft by hijackers. 

    Note: At that time, United Airlines was recognized within the FAA for their serious safety problems, their violations of major air safety requirements, their falsification of federally-required records showing compliance, when compliance had not occurred. This problem played a major role in many United Airlines crashes, including the prior airliner crash into New York City that was the world's worst at that time and occurred in the program for which Stich had federal air safety responsibilities (solely for a considerable period of time).

The first series of attempts to report the corrupt and criminal activities and provide supporting evidence, as they related to a series of fatal airline crashes, some of them occurring in the area of federal air safety responsibilities for FAA inspector Rodney Stich--including the PRIOR United Airlines crash into New York City that was the world's worst, occurred in the 1970s. Click here for a list of some of the federal filings by Stich under the federal crime reporting statute and under the statute permitting any citizen to seek a court order to force a federal official (such as in the FAA and NTSB) to perform their duties and to halt their unlawful conduct.

The refusal by federal judges to receive this information caused the continuation of the misconduct within the federal air safety agencies, and this continuation resulted, as expected, in a continuation of airline disasters closely linked to the FAA misconduct. Federal judges thereby became complicit with the people perpetrating the criminal acts.

Sampling of Letters Related to Aviation Terrorism

Sampling of letters sent to government personnel relating to the bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 that exploded over Lockerbie.

Letter to NTSB Chairman Jim Hall, March 13, 1997, bringing to his attention to role of the CIA and Justice Department in making it possible for terrorists to acquire surface-to-air missiles shortly before the downing of TWA Flight 800 This information, which was based on confidential data obtained by Stich from a CIA source who was directly involved in the missile negotiations, played a major role in the investigation of the missile-downing of TWA Flight 800. No response from Hall, no interest, typical of what Stich had discovered of the NTSB while he was a federal air safety investigator. Hall continued his role in the unprecedented cover-up and misinformation relating to the TWA Flight 800 disaster. (MS Word)

Letters Relating to Drug Trafficking and
Murder Implicating DEA Personnel

Stich discovered from an INS agent information about a drug smuggling operation in Mexico run by DEA agents, and the killing of a Mexican national by a DEA agent who had discovered his identity. The details of this relationship is found in the edition of Defrauding America and first edition of Drugging America. For reasons that can only be speculated, the president of Mexico and other Mexican officials refused to act on this information.

Letter to U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, May 24, 1998, putting her on notice of drug trafficking and murder in Mexico by agents of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, offering to provide the testimony of an INS agent who reported the crimes. No response, despite the gravity of the allegations. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter to President of Mexico, Ernesto Zedillo. (May 11, 1998) The purpose of this letter was to put the president of Mexico on notice of a criminal operation in Mexico by an agent of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the murder of a Mexican citizen by this DEA agent when the Mexican accidentally discovered the agent's identity during a drug loading operation at a remote mountainous airstrip east of Los Mochis, Mexico; and the cover-up of these crimes by other agents and agencies of the U.S. government. The intent was also to get publicity that would alert people of the United States as to the criminal and subversive acts of government personnel. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter to Jesus Reyes Herroles, the Mexican ambassador in Washington, D.C.,  (May 11, 1998) informing him of the DEA's drug smuggling operation in Mexico and the murder of a Mexican national by a DEA agent. No response was received to this certified letter. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter to the Mexican Consul, (April 20, 1998), advising the Mexican government of a sequestered INS report that described the drug-smuggling operation at a remote airstrip in Mexico controlled by an agent of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, the murder of a Mexican national by that DEA agent after the Mexican cargo handler discovered the identity of the DEA agent, and the cover-ups and obstruction of justice relating to these matters by other agents and agencies of the U.S. government. The events described in that letter have major international implications, and to the mass of evidence showing how government agents in the United States have directly and indirectly become criminally involved in drugging the American people. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter to CIA's Director George Tenet (February 2, 1998), offering evidence of CIA drug trafficking from a coalition of present and former government agents, including former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial operations. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

ACLU Lawyers Cover-Ups and Obstruction of Justice

For over 40 years the cover-ups by the ACLU and the legal fraternity are detailed in the three books, Unfriendly Skies, Defrauding America, and Drugging America. These cover-ups permitted the continuation of documented corrupt activities against the American people and the infliction of great personal and financial harm upon them. The recorded cover-ups commenced while Rodney Stich was a federal air safety inspector and continued to cover-up for criminal activities combined with civil rights violations that involved aviation, drug smuggling by people acting under cover of their government operations, fraud in the federal and state courts, and more. By reading the three books, and examining a federal law suit filed by former federal air safety inspector Rodney Stich, highlights of the pattern of criminal and civil rights violations by the legal fraternity, at various state and federal levels, in and out of government, becomes obvious.

Letter of March 28, 2000, responding to ACLU cover-up of March 17, 2000. Stich has records of ACLU cover-ups commencing in the 1960s when he informed the ACLU of the pattern of corruption within the FAA and the resulting air tragedies. No meaningful response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Letter to ACLU national headquarters, March 17, 2000, reporting the serious misconduct by federal judges (which involved the ACLU-connected law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross of San Francisco).  (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

ACLU cover-up letter from San Francisco office of ACLU, March 10, 2000. For MS Word click here. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

ACLU. Letter to San Francisco office of ACLU, February 15, 2000, reporting widespread civil rights and criminal violations by federal judges. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Earlier letters, starting in 1964, reveal ACLU cover-ups that made possible patterns of corruption continuing to inflict great harm upon Americans, as revealed in the three books. These earlier letters will be uploaded as time permits.

Letters detailing hard-core criminal activities in key government offices were sent to the ACLU starting in 1964, followed by total refusal to act on either the crimes against the United States or the massive civil rights violations by federal judges that were perpetrated as part of the efforts to block Stich's reporting of these criminal activities. If the ACLU lawyers had not engaged in the felony cover--ups, many fatal airline accidents could have been prevented that resulted from the FAA misconduct, as well as the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. As time permits, these earlier letters will be uploaded.

Cover-Ups by Media People

Forty years of recorded cover-ups and obstruction of justice by the broadcast and print media relating to the criminal activities detailed in the three books. These cover-ups made possible grave consequences for the American public, and continues after the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. The cover-ups and obstruction of justice constitute adversarial acts against the American people, compounding the adversaries they face from terrorists. The following are a sampling of letters sent to the broadcast and print media offering evidence of the corrupt and criminal activities.

U.S. News and World Reports, Jim Morris, senior writer, August 16, 2000. Sent letter and copy of Drugging America and Defrauding America, which revealed to him and the publisher the criminal activities discovered by Stich and his group of federal agents. Nothing was done with this information. September 11 successful terrorist attacks were among the many consequences of cover-up by the media. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

John Birch Society, Alan Scholl, Chief Operations Officer, August 1, 1999. Letter and copy of Drugging America. Reported the corruption that Stich and his group of other former government agents discovered. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Wall Street Journal November 5, 1998. Stich sent a letter to the editor of the Wall Street Journal, following an editorial on false child sex charges. Stich referred to the false sex charges against an FBI agent Richard Taus when the agent refused to cover up for CIA drug smuggling with the American Mafia and the drug activities that funded terrorist cells in the New Jersey and New York areas. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Author's February 23, 1998 letter to CIA's Director George Tenet, offering evidence of CIA drug trafficking from a coalition of present and former government agents. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

These charges were being made by a former federal air safety inspector who had become a central focal point for other government agents to report criminal and subversive activities. The charges were very specific, and of hardcore misconduct. The consequences to the United States, and involving the lives and the deaths of countless numbers of people, required that his evidence be received. Instead, silence. Click here for author's background and qualifications.

IMPORTANT!

Suggestion: Contact in writing the recipients of these letters and ask for an explanation of why they did not respond. This would include every member of the Senate and House intelligence committees, and especially why they did not respond to:

  • Warnings of surface-to-air missiles being acquired by terrorists, as shown by the letter sent to Senator Specter.

  • Warnings of a key federal air safety agent who offered testimony and hard evidence of corruption within the FAA and Justice Department.

If enough people write, and demand a hearing on the matters offered by former federal air safety agent Rodney Stich and his group of other government agents, a crisis could arise in government from the impending exposure of widespread corruption.

If you arrived here from a search engine, click below to go to home pages with their many other links to related material.

Go to Defrauding America home page.
Go to Drugging America home page.
Go to Unfriendly Skies home page.

Help fund our exposure activities by placing orders for any amazon.com products through our links.

 

 

 

 

 

Return To Beginning