This site lists a sampling of letters relating to documented corrupt and criminal activities in
key judicial and government offices, and the pattern of cover-ups. They were
sent to members of Congress, Justice Department officials, Supreme Court
Justices, and show the totality of the cover-ups and obstruction of
justice related to criminal and even subversive activities in certain government
offices, most of which continue to this day, inflicting great harm upon national
interests and upon the lives of many people.
The significance of these letters is that they show a culture throughout
government that created conditions that insured the success of the September 11
terrorists, and through the post-September 11 cover-ups and disinformation,
insures the success of future terrorist attacks. They show that foreign
terrorists are only one source of great harm to the United States and its
people, while another source is in the form of a Trojan horse that defrauds the
American people, and in many cases, constitutes a great threat and source of
harm than foreign terrorists.
Letters relating to events of September 11, 2001
The success of 19 hijackers on September 11, 2001, that led to the brutal
death of 3,000 people, was due far more to serious misconduct in the
government's air safety functions that due to any "intelligence failure." The following are a few of the warning letters written before the
September 11, 2001, events which detailed the serious problems in the federal
air safety agencies, the FBI and other Justice Department divisions, the federal
courts, where federal judges engaged in criminal acts to block the reporting of
widespread corruption in government offices, and the endemic cover-ups and
obstruction of justice by members of Congress. It is obvious from these letters
that the success of the four groups of hijackers on September 11, 2001, were due
to the corrupt and criminal acts that former federal air safety inspector Rodney
Stich detailed in these letters. These documented felonies, by key people in the
three branches of government, reveal that the 3,000 deaths on September 11 were
made possible by far more than an "intelligence failure." The present
cover-up of these matters greatly increases the success rate of subsequent
terrorists and encourages them to carry out their schemes.
Sampling Of Letters By Former Federal Air Safety Agent
Letters sent to every justice of the U.S. Supreme
Court with copies to members of Congress (February 6, 2003), law firms
representing relatives of 9-11 aviation catastrophe, media members, and others,
putting them on notice of documented corruption that enabled the events of 9-11
to occur. The charges are of such gravity encompassing large numbers of U.S.
leaders that the the information will surely be kept from the public. These
long-documented cover-ups insures that the American public will continue to
suffer the consequences, just as they have done for many years. (Word
format) The charges are so serious, made me Stich and other former
government agents, and the consequences on national security and other major
national interests, are of such grave consequences that it would be
irresponsible for anyone failing to conduct an immediate public investigation.
Letters to U.S. district court judge Michael B. Mukasey, (New York City)
with copies to numerous members of Congress (November 2, 2002) relating to the
judicial and other cover-ups of the corruption in government that played key
roles in the success of the 19 terrorist hijackers on September 11, 2001. Letter
describes some of the corruption that enabled the 19 hijackers to succeed, the
corruption that made many prior hijackings and air disasters occur, corruption
that continues other non-publicized tragedies, and corruption that will
repeatedly insure other deja vu tragedies. (html
format) (Word
format)
Letter to Senator John McCain (May 24, 2002) reporting corruption in
certain government offices that enabled 19 hijackers to succeed, and other areas
of non-publicized corruption continuing to inflict great harm upon America's
people. (html
format) (Word
format)
Letter to Senator Joseph Lieberman (May 22, 2002) relating to his recent
television comments and the events of September 11. (html
format) (Word
format)
Letter to President George Bush (May 17, 2002) relating to documented
misconduct in his area of oversight responsibilities that made September 11
possible and which were continuing to exist. (html
format) (Word
format)
Letter
to President George Bush (April 7, 2001) concerning the non-response to the March 1, 2001
letter that made serious charges of corrupt and criminal activities falling
under the responsibilities of his administration, and involving people in his
administration. These charges included those that made possible the success of
prior terrorist hijackings involving people in air safety government positions,
in the Justice Department, and in the federal courts. It didn't require a rocket
scientist to understand that sooner or later terrorists would take advantage of
these weaknesses, which they did do on September 11, 2001. The writer of the
letter had 60 years of sophisticated aviation background, was a former federal
air safety inspector in a key air safety position, and was thoroughly qualified
to make the statements that he made in that letter. President Bush's cover-up of
these matters than made possible the success of the September 11, 2001,
terrorists. Covering up for his own duplicity, and that of U.S. leaders, he
praised everyone in sight, and dispensed in wholesale fashion the
"hero" label. For
Word
format click here.
Letter to
NTSB Chairman Jim Hall, March 13, 1997, bringing to his attention to role of the CIA and Justice Department in making it possible for terrorists to acquire surface-to-air
missiles shortly before the downing of TWA Flight 800 This information, which was based on confidential data obtained by Stich from a CIA source who was directly involved in the missile negotiations, played a major role in the investigation of the missile-downing of TWA Flight 800.
No response from Hall, no interest, typical of what Stich had discovered of
the NTSB while he was a federal air safety investigator. Hall continued his role in the unprecedented
cover-up and misinformation relating to the TWA Flight 800 disaster. For
Word
format click here.
President
George Bush, March 1, 2001. This letter reported criminal activities in key
government offices that a group of present and former federal agents had
discovered, and the misuse of government offices to retaliate against the
agents. No response. After the September 11, 2001,
terrorist hijackings, made possible by the matters brought to his attention, he
then engaged in knee-jerk reactions that will lead to more deaths and even worse
consequences for the United States. His understanding of realities is reflected
by his bizarre statement, "The terrorists hate us because we are so
good." Another example of his leadership is his statement that he is
authorizing the funding of a system to prevent airline pilots maintaining
control of the airliners and transferring control to someone on the ground.
Another bizarre example of his competence and judgment is his authorizing the
military to shoot down an airliner, that may have 300 to 400 people on board, if
someone on the ground thinks the aircraft may be hijacked, and thinks it may be
flown into a prominent building. With this type of responsibility and
leadership, everyone better start praying and hope there is a God! For
Word
format click here.
Attorney
General John Ashcroft, February 29, 2001. The letter reported what Stich
and other former federal agents had discovered that included a pattern of
documented corruption in key government offices, the retaliation against
government agents who attempt to report the corrupt activities, and the harm
inflicted upon the United States by this misconduct. No response. That letter, sent prior to the September 11, 2001,
hijackings, warned of the internal FAA corruption that insured the success of the September 11 terrorist
hijackings. If the attorney general of the United States had responded and
reacted to that letter, it is highly possible that corrective actions could have
been taken to require the simple and obvious corrective actions that would have
prevented the success of the September 11 hijackings. For
Word
format click here.
Louis J.
Freeh, Director, FBI, February 26, 2001. Reported hard-core civil rights
violations in federal courts, federal judges blocking reports of criminal
activities, judicial retaliation for exercising the responsibility to make such
reports, and of drug smuggling by people acting under government cover. No
response. That letter provided detailed information, similar to that given to
U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft, about corrupt activities implicating
people in government positions that were aiding and abetting terrorist
activities. As with the letters sent to other federal personnel, including
Ashcroft, actions could have been taken to have prevented the success of the
September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackers. Further, covering up for the misconduct
stated in those letters constitute obstruction of justice. For
Word format click here.
Letter sent to FBI agent
Daley (July 30,
1996), making a record of the fact that Stich offered to provide the FBI with
information on the missiles and that the FBI showed no interest in receiving
the information. Instead, the FBI agents warned him to remain quiet about the
matter. No response denying what was stated in that letter. For
Word
format click here.
Letters
sent to Senator Arlen Specter (October 20, 1995) and every members of the
Senate and House Intelligence Committees, consisting of three pages of
details, making reference to statements and documentation that Stich obtained
from one of his CIA sources, describing the imminent transfer of up to 100 SAM
missiles to Afghan terrorists. No response, despite the enormous human
tragedies arising from the acquisition of these missiles by terrorists. For
Word
format click here.
It is possible that one or more of these missiles could have been involved in
the downing of TWA Flight 800 and one possible reason for the bizarre NTSB and
FBI cover-ups. Another significance is that these missiles can be used at any
time to inflict havoc by shooting down, or threatening to shoot down,
commercial aircraft. No response from any of the members of the House and
Senate intelligence committees.
Names
of other members of the Senate and House intelligence committees who
did not respond to the urgent warning letters of SAM missiles being
transferred to Afghan terrorists.
Similar warning letters relating to misconduct related to a continuing
series of fatal airline crashes were first sent to these key government positions
while Rodney Stich was a federal air safety inspector responsible for air safety
at the most senior program for the world's largest airline at that time (United
Airlines). These letters were sent while the airline was experiencing repeated air disasters due to
documented misconduct at the airline and within the Federal Aviation
Administration. Among these air disasters was the world's worst, a DC-8 crash
into New York City, which was followed years later by the United Airlines and
American Airlines 767s crashing into the World Trade Center. All three of these
air disasters were made possible by the documented but unpublicized corruption
within the FAA.
The letters relate to factual matters and not simply opinions. The letters
show that the success of the September 11 terrorists was not simply an
intelligence failure, but far worse. The significance of these letters is that
they state specific areas of corrupt, criminal and even subversive activities,
sent by a respected, highly qualified, former federal air safety inspector with
dozens of government agents providing him with information. The grave
consequences for the United States and the lives of many people, if any single
one of the charges are true, required that he be contacted and his evidence and
testimony examined.
The responsibility to do these follow-up actions arises under their
oversight responsibilities and under several federal criminal statutes,
including the federal
crime
reporting statute. The total refusal of the recipients to respond strongly
indicate that they already knew of part of the charges and that they were
joining the practice of covering up. This was how the stage was set for the
success of the September 11 terrorist hijackers and for the success of many
future terrorist attacks.
A suggestion: send a copy of a particular
letter to the member of congress that the letter was originally sent to, and ask
that government employee what he or she did in response to it. (In Internet
explorer, File, Send, Page by E-mail, and then insert your questions at the top
of the letter being forwarded.) If enough people would do this, it is possible
that the massive cover-ups can be circumvented. If this is not done, the 3,000
deaths on September 11, 2001, will simply be another blip in a long line of
prior fraud related tragedies made possible by the cover-ups. E-mail addresses
of members of the House and Senate can be obtained by
clicking
here. Be advised that the gravity of the misconduct involving the deaths of
3,000 people, and other matters of major national concern, is so great that
members of Congress will use various tactics to sidestep the issues.
Among the areas covered by the
letters would be:
- Decades of corruption within the FAA and the crashes and deaths
caused by this misconduct, as documented by an FAA inspector assigned the
responsibility to correct the problems that brought about the worst series
of airline crashes in the nation's history.
- The arrogant and corrupt conduct by people in
key positions in the three branches of government, who share
various degrees of secondary blame for the 3,000 deaths on September 11, 2001,
that is not being addressed, partly because of the multiple scandals that
would be exposed.
- The multiple threats to the survival of the
United States and to the American people, consisting of far more than just
the terrorist threat. For many victims of this corruption, their
tragic plight arises not from external terrorists, for from the arrogance
and corruption involving people corruption the government positions they
control, including federal judges.
Each of the following sampling of letters sent to members of Congress
related to matters discovered by government personnel in key insider positions
reporting matters of grave national interest, including national security. Many
of the letters warned of great personal and financial harm that would occur, and
did occur. These consequences did
occur, as described in the third editions of
Defrauding
America and Unfriendly
Skies and the first edition of
Drugging
America.
The recipients of these letters, by their cover-ups and obstruction of
justice, made possible the infliction of great harm upon the men and women of
the United States, including many deaths. Only a few good. Because of their
felony involvement through cover-ups and obstruction of justice, they will never
allow the people to discover these matters. That is especially true as it
relates to who and what form of misconduct played key roles in the deaths of
3,000 people on September 11. The misconduct is far more than an intelligence
failure.
Letters Relating To Downing Of TWA
Flight 800 (Before and After)
Letters Warning of Hardcore Misconduct Followed By
Deja Vu Tragedies Caused Or Made Possible by the Misconduct, Including the September 11, 2001, Terrorist
Acts
The importance of these letters is to show that government
insiders, who had information and supporting documentation on hardcore corrupt,
criminal, and even subversive activities, sought to provide this information to
members of Congress under their congressional responsibilities and under the
federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. By refusing to receive
the information, they aided and abetted the criminal activities and the great
harm inflicted upon the United States and its people. These crimes are far worse
than the offenses for which many men and women have been sent to federal prison
for long prison sentences. (In most cases these letters will be posted in
reverse order of having been sent, so the most recent letters are at the top of
this sampling of letters.)
Letter
sent to Senator John McCain, May 24, 2002, with similar copies to Senators
Bob Graham, Robert Torricelli, Kay Hutchinson, Joseph Lieberman, Tom Daschle,
and others.
Letter
sent to President George Bush, May 17, 2002, informing him, again, of the
government agents who had previously reported to him corrupt, criminal, and
subversive activities that were adversely affecting national security, including
matters aiding and abetting terrorist acts from outside the United States, and
that these conditions still exist after September 11. Further, that the corrupt
conditions directly related to the success of the 9-11 terrorists still existed.
Since the writer of that letter was a prominent federal air safety inspector
with numerous government sources revealing multiple areas of corruption in
government offices, and the gravity of the consequences, refusal to respond
would be most probably due to the fact he already knows of these matters.
Letter sent to Vice
President Richard Chaney, May 17, 2002, informing him of the same
information sent to President George Bush. with the circle of spin-doctors
around President Bush, including Bush himself, Chaney is a refreshing change,
but limited to not contradicting President Bush. With such politically-correct
"protectors" of national security as Condoleezza Rice and of air
safety as FAA Administrator Jane Garvey, the United States desperately needs
someone with experience, a level head, and who can speak straight!
Letter
sent to Senator Dianne Feinstein, May 5, 2002, reporting criminal activities
that Stich and a group of other former government agents had discovered, some of
which played a role in insuring the success of the four groups of hijackers on
September 11, 2001. (Word format)
Letter sent to Senator Barbara Boxer, May 5, 2002, reporting the same
criminal activities as described in the letter to Senator Feinstein. The intent
of the letters was to make a record through the certified mailings that they
knew of these serious charges and that they continued their prior cover-ups.
Letters from people in key government positions, as held by Stich, with matters
of such grave national impact, could not be simply ignored without being guilty
of grave misconduct.
Letter
sent to Representative Nancy Pelosi, May 5, 2002, (Word format) in response to her
attempt to give letters to China's visiting vice president complaining of human
rights abuses in China. This certified letter was to make another record of her
repeated cover-up of both the human rights abuses and the criminal activities in
government that the violations were intended to halt.
Letter
sent to FBI Director Robert Mueller, October 18, 2001, detailing the pattern
of documented corruption that encouraged and insured the success of the September 11, 2001,
terrorist hijackings. For
Word
format, click here.
Letter
sent to Attorney General John Ashcroft, October 2, 2001, similar to the
letter sent to FBI Director Robert Mueller. For
Word
format, click here.
Sampling Of Recent FBI and
Justice
Department Letters
Based upon over 40 years of close contact with the various
divisions of the U.S. Department of Justice, the people and the mindset by the
lawyers that make up these government agencies is by far the most corrupt and
dangerous to the men, women, and children of the United States, and to the
internal security of America.
Sampling of
letters
sent to the U.S. Department of Justice reporting various areas of criminal
activities in the three branches of government, followed by cover-ups (i.e.,
obstruction of justice). Does not include letters sent years earlier, while
Rodney Stich was a federal air safety inspector, that sought to expose the
corruption that played a decisive role in a continuing series of airline
crashes, including fatal hijackings that could have been easily halted. They
violated their duties as Justice Department employees and under the federal
crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.
Justice Department
and FBI Hypocrisy
No limit to hypocrisy. On the Internet
site for the FBI, www.fbi.gov, there
are pages of assurances that the FBI will protect your civil rights. For
instance, the FBI's responsibility for investigating civil rights
violations is stated in part as follows:
The Federal Bureau of Investigation
(FBI) is the primary federal agency responsible for investigating all
allegations regarding violations of applicable civil rights laws. These
laws are designed to protect the civil rights of all citizens and
persons within United States territory. The mission of the FBI's Civil
Rights Program is to enforce federal civil rights statutes and to ensure
that the protected civil rights of all inhabitants are not abridged. The
FBI ... requires each field office to initiate a civil rights
investigation whenever information is received from any source not known
to be unreliable. ... The FBI has the mission to investigation
allegations of civil rights violations pursuant to federal statutes.
Final prosecutive authority rests with DOJ's Civil Rights Division.
Sampling of Letters Reflecting 40
Years Of Cover-ups By Members Of Congress
Many letters were sent to members of Congress over the years
reporting various corrupt and criminal activities that fell within their
responsibilities as members of Congress and also under the responsibilities of
federal officials, under the federal crime reporting statute (Title
18 U.S.C. § 4) to receive such information and take required actions.
Activist Rodney Stich first reported to members of Congress
the deep-seated culture of corruption within the FAA that he discovered as a federal
air safety inspector. In later years, as other federal agents provided Stich
with information and documentation on other areas of corruption, he sought to
report these federal crimes. The criminal activities included drug smuggling into the United States by the CIA and other
government entities, corruption in the federal courts, and other matters
of major national interest. The following list of letters are in addition to, or
a direct link to the letters listed elsewhere.
Letters
to every member of the House and Senate judiciary committees, (April 4,
2001), in response to their non-response to my earlier letters reporting the
criminal activities in their areas of oversight responsibilities. The purpose of
the letters, and in other instances, was to make a record that a group of
federal agents offered to provide evidence to them of criminal activities in key
judicial and other government offices and that they refused to respond. In the
event the American public ever discovered the widespread corruption against them
by people in control of key government offices, this record of felony cover-ups
by members of Congress could be used for their prosecution, imprisonment, and
impeachment. For
Word
format click here.
Representative
Dan Burton, March 15, 2001. Letter putting him on notice of the documented
actions by federal judges blocking the reports to a federal court, under the
federal crime reporting statute, of the corrupt and criminal activities that
former federal air safety inspector Rodney Stich and his group of other
government agents sought to report. These judicial obstruction of justice
actions blocked the reporting of corrupt actions that played key roles in the
September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. The letter to Burton was motivated by his statements on the Fox
News O'Reilly show that "we have honesty in government." For
Word
format click here.
Reply letter to
Representative Coble, Chairman of House Subcommittee on Courts, February 23,
2001, making a record of his
cover-up.
For Word
format click here.
Response
from Senator Diane Feinstein, February 15, 2001 to letter sent on
February 2, 2001 to all members of the Senate Judiciary Committee. This was her
stonewalling response to prior letter informing her of documented criminal
activities in Ninth Circuit federal courts and federal judges' blocking the
reports of criminal activities which they must receive under the federal crimes
reporting statute (Title
18 U.S.C. § 4). She excused doing nothing on separation of power in the three branches of government, ignoring her
oversight responsibilities of the courts and other government operations, and
her responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute. She was a member
of the oversight committee on the judiciary.
Letter responding to
Senator Feinstein's cover-up
(March 1, 2001). The letter chastised the senator for continuing the
pattern of cover-ups that has made possible the continuation of the criminal
activities in key judicial and other government offices (which included the
Federal Aviation Administration). For
Word
format click here.
Representative
George Miller, February 9, 2001. Letter sent to Miller who represents
the constituencies in Stich's California district concerning the corrupt and
criminal acts that Stich and his group of present and former government agents
had discovered. Miller had been covering up,
for years, the criminal activities that Stich uncovered, starting with the
misconduct that played a key role in many airline crashes.
No response. For
Word
format click here.
Representative
Tom Delay, February 9, 2001. Stich made reference to Delay's comments
about everyone's "right to be heard on ... legal questions." Stich's
letter made reference to the criminal contempt of court charges filed against
Stich by Justice Department prosecutors and federal judges in retaliation for
seeking to report the criminal activities and for exercising
federal remedies against the civil rights
violations that were part of the scheme to silence him. No
response. For
Word
format click here.
Response
letter from Representative Howard Coble, Chairman of Subcommittee on Courts,
response of February 8, 2001 to Stich's letter. His response to the charges
of serious criminal and subversive conduct: "Due to the limited resources
of the Committee ...." He had no time to address the serious matters of
widespread judicial corruption, subversion of major laws and the Constitution,
and criminal activities, but had time for trivial matters, including almost
daily raising of funds. This conduct is far worse that simply malfeasance and
nonfeasance; these are major federal crimes under the obstruction of justice
statutes. The relatives of the 5,000 deaths on September 11, 2001, can thank
Coble and the other members of Congress who covered up for the corruption in
government that also made many other air tragedies possible.
Letters
sent to Senator Patrick Leahy, (January 29, 2001), chairman of the Senate
Judiciary Committee, and to every member of the senate and house judiciary
committees, providing specific information about a pattern of documented
corrupt activities in the federal courts involving the Supreme Court justices,
the actions by federal judges blocking the reporting of criminal activities, the
judicial retaliation for attempting to make such reports, and the concurrent
subversion of civil rights by the judges. None responded, included those who professed to the public about
protecting due process rights to any citizen--especially if they are
minorities (which is a standard congressional race card tactic). For
Word
format click here.
Representative
F. James Sensenbrenner, Chairman, House Committee on the Judiciary. January 29,
2001. This letter was sent to every member of the House and Senate
judiciary committees. They had oversight responsibilities for the federal
judiciary, for which Stich offered documented evidence of widespread corruption
in the federal courts. The letter described the documented obstruction of
justice by federal judges who blocked the reporting of criminal activities under
the federal crime reporting statute. Among the federal offenses being cover-up
by the federal judges were those that made possible the success of the September
11, 2001, terrorist hijackers. No response. For
Word
format click here.
Names
of members of the Senate and House judiciary committees who did not
respond to letters reporting serious judicial corruption.
Representative
Barbara Lee, July 20, 2000. Stich sent a cover letter and copy of
Drugging
America to her because of the black representatives loudly proclaiming
outrage at CIA drug trafficking. No reaction. For
Word
format click here.
Senator
Barbara Boxer response, August 30, 1999, acknowledging receipt of the book,
Drugging
America, which details the drug smuggling by people in key government
positions, funding of key politicians by CIA operations, Justice Department
personnel blocking federal agents from targeting the drug operations funding
terrorist cells in New Jersey and New York--the same ones that bombed the World
Trade Center in 1993, funded the plan to place bombs on 11 U.S. airliners
department the Far East, and suspected of funding the September 11, 2001,
terrorist hijackings.
Letter to Senator
Barbara Boxer, August 9, 1999, describing the drug trafficking by people in
the CIA as revealed by a group of federal agents and other misconduct, including
that within the FAA that insured the success of the September 11, 2001,
terrorist hijackers. For
Word
format click here.
Letter
sent to Senator Hatch (September 8, 1997) describing the documented
corruption in the federal courts that were blocking the reporting of criminal
activities and were subverting the laws and Constitution of the United States
in a scheme to obstruct justice. No response.
The
letters offered to provide evidence via the testimony of former federal
agents, including the FBI, DEA, Customs, and CIA, including the former
heads of secret CIA airlines and financial operations. No response.
For Word
format click here.
Author's
letter to Senator Specter warning of surface to air missile attacks upon
commercial aircraft, the basis of which was information and documentation
received from a friend and former head of a major and secret CIA financial
proprietary based in Honolulu. This warning letter, and efforts to reduce the
risk of aircraft being shot down, related to approximately 100 missiles
offered to the United States that terrorists were seeking to buy. This letter
had great significance in the investigation of TWA Flight 800, which has been
covered up.
Author's letter to
Senator
Orrin Hatch, September 8, 1997. The significance of this letter is that it
offered Senator Hatch evidence from the coalition of government agents to
prove the existence of CIA, DEA and military drug trafficking into the United
States and the cover-up of this information by federal judges and Supreme
Court justices.
Another list of
letters
sent to members of Congress, reporting corrupt and criminal activities for
which they had responsibilities under their congressional duties and under the
federal crime reporting statute.
Earlier letters showing congressional cover-ups and obstruction of justice
go back to 1964, associated with a series of very brutal airline disasters,
including a United Airlines DC-8 that crashed into New York City, which was the
world's worst air disaster at that time. The next worst aviation disaster also
included a United Airlines crash into the World Trade Center on September 11,
2001. There are scandalous connections between the two tragedies that reveal
Americans have more than a single set of adversaries.
Complicity Of Federal Judges and Supreme
Court Justices
Here lies an area of unpublicized corruption that is totally
without any publicity, and which plays a role in the continuation of many
tragedies upon the people, and grave harm to national interests. The 3,000
deaths on September 11, 2001, probably could not have happened if the documented
cover-ups, and worse crimes, by federal judges had not occurred.
The federal crime reporting statute,
Title
18 U.S.C. § 4, specifically requires that anyone knowing of a federal crime
must promptly report it to a federal judge (or other federal officer--including
members of Congress and Justice Department personnel), and that they must
receive the information or them themselves are guilty of the crime of misprision
of felony. Since Justice Department personnel and members of Congress refused to
receive the information, Stich attempted to report to a federal court the
information and evidence of criminal activities that he and his large group of
government agents had discovered as part of their official government duties. ,
Stich's
early
attempts in the late 1970s and early 1980s related to the corruption in the
Federal Aviation Administration that was playing a continuing role in a series
of fatal airline crashes and the cover-ups of these federal crimes.
Starting
in 1986, he again attempted to report additional areas of criminal activities to
a federal court, and again encountered repeated obstruction of justice by
federal judges at every level, including by the Justice of the U.S. Supreme
Court. This obstruction of justice, of matters inflicting great harm upon the
people and upon major national interests, including national security, showed
the widespread felony obstruction of justice throughout the three branches of
the federal government.
The attempts to report these
criminal activities to a federal judge were through federal lawsuits, appeals,
and petitions to the Supreme Court, and further through letters to Supreme Court
Justices. A few of the letters and petitions are shown at this Internet site. It
is important to understand the gravity of this judicial cover-up.
Sampling
Of Letters and Petitions To Supreme Court Justices
The
petition detailed how the CIA-front law firm misused the legal process to halt
the exposure of these federal crimes, and how federal judges aided and abetted
the scheme through massive and documented misuse of the courts. The petition and
related legal filings detail the massive and repeated violations of state and
federal laws by the CIA-front law firm, a group of California judges, and
finally by federal judges. Stich submitted a
petition
for extraordinary writ to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on May 2,
2002, putting him on notice of these criminal activities, on notice of the heavy
and documented involvement of federal judges in these crimes, and the
relationship to the events of September 11, 2001. (Word format)
Letters
sent to Chief Justice Rehnquist and each of the Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States
(April 11, 2001). For
Word
format click here. Click here for
Adobe
PDF format.)
Letter
to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas (February 15, 2001),
describing the corruption in the lower federal courts, their obstruction of
justice tactics, their felony retaliation against the former federal agent
seeking to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting
statute. This letter was a follow-up to an emergency petition submitted to
Justice Thomas. No response. For
Word
format click here.
Supreme Court
Justice Clarence Thomas, February 15, 2001 Petition for emergency relief. The
purpose of this petition was to report to a federal court the criminal activities under the federal
crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4), to report the obstruction of
justice actions by federal judges who were blocking the reporting of federal
crimes to a federal court, and to report the retaliation by federal judges for
attempting to make these reports. These judicial acts played a role in the
misconduct that insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist
hijackings. No response. For
Word
format click here.
Petition for
emergency relief February 8, 2001 to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas.
Supreme
Court Justice William Rehnquist, January 2, 2001. The letter described
documented misconduct by federal judges, including their blocking of reports of
criminal activities, retaliating against the former federal agent for seeking to
report the criminal activities, and the civil rights violations that were part
of the scheme initiated by a CIA related law firm in San Francisco (Friedman,
Sloan and Ross) to block Stich's reporting of the criminal activities Stich
discovered within the FAA and other government offices. No response. For
Word
format click here.
U.S.
Supreme Court Petition for writ of certiorari, November 10, 2000. This
petition described the pattern by federal judges of blocking the reports of
criminal activities that amounted to obstruction of justice, the civil rights
violations that were part of the scheme to block these reports, and other
violations. For
Word
format click here.
Letter
to Supreme Court Justice William Rehnquist, March 16, 2000, with
similar information. No response. For
Word
format click here.
U.S. District Judge Milton
Schwartz, June 19, 1998. Stich made
reference to his role in blocking the reports of criminal activities and his
role in the scheme initiated by the CIA-front law firm. For
Word
format click here.
Letter to the clerk of the
U.S. Supreme Court,
clerk, William K. Sutter,
(August 23, 1997) making reference to his role in fraudulently refusing to file a petition for writ of certiorari which would have made a judicial record of certain major segments of the judicial and other corruption which Stich and his group of government agents had discovered, including the pattern of CIA drug trafficking into the United States, the Justice Department retaliation against Stich and his coalition for seeking to report these criminal acts, and the role of federal judges in these actions.
An August 1997 petition to the United States
Supreme Court reported the corruption relating to a series of prior airline
crashes and the judicial and Justice Department actions to block these reports,
was submitted to the Court in August 1997. Click here for the
Word
format of that petition. For
html
format click here.
March 4, 1991,
Petition
for emergency relief to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court,
seeking relief from continuation of criminal contempt of court charges against
him for attempting to report criminal activities to a federal court under the
federal crime reporting statute (and for exercising federal due process remedies
against record-setting violations of state and federal laws initiated by a
CIA-front law firm).
One Highly Respected Supreme Court
Justice Implied Gravity Of Charges
Letter
from U.S. Supreme Court justice Byron R. White
(October 28, 1991) in response to report of
corrupt activities in government and in the federal courts, and stating that
as a single justice--without the cooperation of others--"I can be of no
help to you." He implied that if the other Justices had supported him, he
could have taken corrective actions.
List of of
letters
sent to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, reporting corruption among
federal judges that involved felony cover-ups and blocking of reporting of
criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute; the corruption in
the Chapter 11 courts; the pattern of hard-core civil and constitutional
violations perpetrated as part of the judicial efforts to block the reporting of
the criminal activities in the three branches of government. As with all
recipients of these letters, cover-ups are felonies under federal criminal
statutes.
List
of other federal filings and letters to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme
Court, for those who are extra serious in discovering the extent of the
corruption in federal courts that have brought us to the September 11, 2001,
consequences, and probably, under the same leadership, far worse consequences!
Federal
lawsuits related to corruption within the FAA and NTSB, filed by former federal air safety inspector offering evidence of
federal crimes relating to series of fatal airline crashes and the criminal
cover-ups. Other federal lawsuits relating to corrupt federal judges obstructing
justice and retaliating against government whistleblowers can be found by
clicking
here. The judicial cover-ups and obstruction of justice that had blocked
former federal agent Rodney Stich from reporting the culture of corruption in
government continued, which continued to allow the misconduct and the
consequences to continue, including the September 11, 2001, tragedies associated
with FAA problems. When fully understood, the evidence of complicity by wide
segments of the federal judiciary, including Supreme Court Justices, becomes
clear, showing the endemic extent of the adversaries faced by the American
public.
The criminal activities that were being covered up included
those affecting aviation and protections against terrorism. September 11, 2001,
terrorist acts proved again the consequences of these corrupt and criminal acts
and the duplicity of cover-ups that involve virtually every government and
non-government check and balance. The repeated cover-ups after September 11
insures that the public will continue to pay the consequences, and this time,
the consequences will be more severe than those occurring on September 11.
Supreme Court Justices had been made aware, since the 1970s,
of the corrupt and criminal activities in key government offices, especially
within the Federal Aviation Administration. The Justices had been repeatedly
notified of the corrupt, criminal, and civil rights violations perpetrators by
federal judges concurrent with the judicial acts blocking the reporting of
criminal activities to a federal court as required by the federal crime
reporting statute. (Title
18 U.S.C. § 4). These were extremely serious matters that had
national implications, as was seen on September 11, 2001.
Federal Lawsuit Detailing Judicial
Corruption Through Misuse Of Legal Process and Federal Courts by CIA-Front Law
Firm, California Judges, and Federal Judges
Details of how a CIA-front law firm conspired with federal
judges to block the reporting of hardcore criminal and subversive activities,
much of which are detailed in the third editions of
Unfriendly
Skies and Defrauding
America, and in a
federal
lawsuit filed in the U.S. district court at Reno, Nevada. To view the
lawsuit
in Word format click here.
Continuing Judicial Corruption Despite
Their Key Role In September 11, 2001 Events
Major federal causes of actions were stated in that Reno lawsuit
for which federal law barred dismissal. Failure to dismiss that lawsuit risked:
-
Exposing the criminal and subversive activities that Stich
and his group of government agents sought to report.
-
Exposing the CIA front law firm and possibly the powerful
source in government that engineered the scheme.
-
Exposing the participants in the scheme, including the
CIA-front law firm, numerous California judges, numerous federal district
and appellate judges and all of the Justices in the U.S. Supreme Court.
Repeating Prior Obstruction Of Justice
and Total Due Process Violations
On February 12, 2002, U.S. District Judge
Reed at Reno, Nevada, unlawfully and unconstitutionally dismissed every
defendant (California judges, federal judges, lawyers, and law firms), dismissed
every non-defendant federal cause of actions filed under the Declaratory
Judgment Act and void judgment doctrine. Further, he refused to receive the
reports and evidence of the criminal activities that Stich and his group of
government agents sought to report. Stich then filed a timely notice of appeal
for which the fees were paid.
Continued Due Process Violations and
Felony Cover-Ups By Appellate Judges
On April 12, 2002, Ninth Circuit appellate judges James R.
Browning, Ronald M. Gould and Andrew J. Kleinfeld filed an order barring Stich
from filing appeal briefs on the holding that a 1994 appellate court order
forever barred Stich from the appellate court. By this unlawful and
unconstitutional denial of due process, the appellate judges continued their
prior obstruction of justice, aiding and abetting the subversive of the laws and
Constitution of the United States, and provided further proof of the extent of
the corruption in the federal government.
Stich responded by filing a
petition for extraordinary relief with Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas
on May 2, 2001, expecting him to continue the prior involving of the Supreme
Court Justices in these multiple and major crimes against the United
States..
For an understanding of the massive violations of federal law
and constitutional protections by the Reno district judge and Ninth Circuit
appellate judges, look at the
draft
of the appeal brief that Stich was prepared to file in the appellate court.
In the process of blocking the reporting of major crimes,
federal judges committed numerous
federal
crimes.
These were very serious offenses! By corrupting the judicial
process, federal judges, up to and including the Justices of the U.S. Supreme
Court, played key roles in not only the cover-ups of criminal activities in
government, but subverted the security of the United States by insuring the
success of the terrorists.
Massive Cover-Ups Enabling the September
11, 2001, Events To Occur
An examination of the sampling of letters and legal filings
will show where the former federal inspector repeatedly reported the criminal
activities and their cover-ups, especially those criminal activities that
insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorists. They show the
following:
-
Attempt to report to them the criminal activities
and provide evidence that the federal crime reporting statute requires that
they receive. Under the clear wording of the federal crime reporting
statute, any federal judge--including the Supreme Court Justices--are
required to receive as part of their administrative duties (as distinct from
their judicial duties) reports and evidence offered to the court concerning
federal crimes. These corrupt and criminal activities included evidence of
wrongdoings that insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorists,
and could very probably have encouraged them to initiate their plans.
-
Report to the Supreme Court Justices the obstruction
of justice by federal judges over whom they have supervisory
responsibilities.
-
Report to the Supreme Court justices the record-setting
civil rights violations perpetrated against the former federal agent as
part of the tactics to block the reporting of the serious corrupt and
criminal activities. It is a federal crime to interfere with or inflict harm
upon a federal agent or former federal agent, or witness, for attempting to
report criminal activities.
-
Seek to have the Supreme Court Justices perform their
mandatory duties, which included ordering a halt to the documented
record-setting violations of civil rights and corrupt misuse of federal
courts. If any one of the Justices had perform their duty--instead of aiding
and abetting the wrongful acts--the September 11, 2001, terrorism probably
would not have occurred, not the catastrophic collateral damage, the extent
of which may be beyond the comprehension of anyone.
-
The corrupt and criminal activities occurring in the
Federal Aviation Administration are detailed in the third edition of Unfriendly
Skies, are found in
sequestered
FAA hearing records, detailed in various federal filings by Stich, and
include such matters as the following:
-
Repeated refusal by FAA management to take
mandatory corrective actions on major air safety problems and air safety
violations, even though a continuing series of fatal airline crashes
were occurring. This would also include refusal to order the simple and
obvious corrective actions (secure doors and absence of keys to the
cockpit) that inspectors reported and which were urgently needed as
shown by the repeated fatal hijackings occurring for the past 40 years.
-
FAA management ordering inspectors not to report
serious safety problems and safety violations.
-
FAA management destroying official air safety
reports filed by federal air safety inspectors to avoid unfavorable
comments when the uncorrected safety problems result in the expected
airline crashes.
-
Retaliating against federal air safety inspectors
when they persist in making the reports or attempt to take corrective
actions required by federal law.
-
Inspectors who were competent, and who attempted to
carry out their federal air safety responsibilities, were threatened
by key personnel at United Airlines and within the FAA. The
immediate consequences of this dual threat to inspectors were the
repeated crashes from 1958 through 1978 due to these problems. The
long-term effect was to aid and abet the internal FAA corruption that
blocked corrective actions for obvious air safety problems, including
the hijacking problems that could have been easily prevented.
Ironically, United Airlines personnel's misconduct had a distant
relationship to the successful terrorist hijackings of September 11,
2001, which resulted in two United Airlines aircraft being hijacked--and
which could have been prevented if United Airlines personnel had not
blocked and threatened federal air safety inspectors who sought to
correct these problems--including the successful takeover of aircraft by
hijackers.
Note: At that time, United Airlines was recognized within
the FAA for their serious safety problems, their violations of major air
safety requirements, their falsification of federally-required records
showing compliance, when compliance had not occurred. This problem played a
major role in many United Airlines crashes, including the prior airliner
crash into New York City that was the world's worst at that time and
occurred in the program for which Stich had federal air safety
responsibilities (solely for a considerable period of time).
The first series of attempts to report the corrupt and
criminal activities and provide supporting evidence, as they related to a series
of fatal airline crashes, some of them occurring in the area of federal air
safety responsibilities for FAA inspector Rodney Stich--including the PRIOR
United Airlines crash into New York City that was the world's worst, occurred in
the 1970s.
Click
here for a list of some of the federal filings by Stich under the federal
crime reporting statute and under the statute permitting any citizen to seek a
court order to force a federal official (such as in the FAA and NTSB) to perform
their duties and to halt their unlawful conduct.
The refusal by federal judges to receive this information
caused the continuation of the misconduct within the federal air safety
agencies, and this continuation resulted, as expected, in a continuation of
airline disasters closely linked to the FAA misconduct. Federal judges thereby
became complicit with the people perpetrating the criminal acts.
Sampling of Letters Related
to
Aviation Terrorism
Sampling of letters sent to government personnel relating to
the bombing
of Pan Am Flight 103 that exploded over Lockerbie.
Letter to
NTSB Chairman Jim Hall, March 13, 1997, bringing to his attention to role of the CIA and Justice Department in making it possible for terrorists to acquire surface-to-air
missiles shortly before the downing of TWA Flight 800 This information, which was based on confidential data obtained by Stich from a CIA source who was directly involved in the missile negotiations, played a major role in the investigation of the missile-downing of TWA Flight 800.
No response from Hall, no interest, typical of what Stich had discovered of
the NTSB while he was a federal air safety investigator. Hall continued his role in the unprecedented
cover-up and misinformation relating to the TWA Flight 800 disaster. For
Word
format click here.
Letters Relating to Drug Trafficking and
Murder Implicating DEA Personnel
Stich discovered from an INS agent information about a drug
smuggling operation in Mexico run by DEA agents, and the killing of a Mexican
national by a DEA agent who had discovered his identity. The details of this
relationship is found in the edition of
Defrauding America and first edition of Drugging America. For reasons
that can only be speculated, the president of Mexico and other Mexican officials
refused to act on this information.
Letter to U.S.
Attorney General Janet Reno,
May 24, 1998, putting her on notice of drug trafficking and murder in Mexico by agents of the U.S. Drug Enforcement
Administration,
offering to provide the testimony of an INS agent who reported the crimes.
(The DEA is a division of the U.S. Department of Justice.) No response, despite the gravity of the allegations. For
Word
format click here.
Letter to President of Mexico, Ernesto Zedillo.
(May 11, 1998) The purpose of this letter was to put the president of Mexico on notice of a criminal operation in Mexico by an agent of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the murder of a Mexican citizen by this DEA agent when the Mexican accidentally discovered the agent's identity during a drug loading operation at a remote mountainous airstrip east of Los
Mochis, Mexico; and the
cover-up of these crimes by other agents and agencies of the U.S. government. The intent was also to get publicity that would alert people of the United States as to the criminal and subversive acts of government personnel.
No response. For
Word
format click here.
Letter to Jesus Reyes
Herroles, the Mexican ambassador in Washington, D.C.,
(May 11, 1998) informing him of the DEA's drug smuggling operation in
Mexico and the murder of a Mexican national by a DEA agent. No response was
received to this certified letter. No response. For
Word
format click here.
Letter to the Mexican Consul,
(April 20, 1998), advising the Mexican government of a sequestered INS report that described the drug-smuggling operation at a remote airstrip in Mexico controlled by an agent of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration, the murder of a Mexican national by that DEA agent after the Mexican cargo handler discovered the identity of the DEA agent, and the
cover-ups and obstruction of justice relating to these matters by other agents and agencies of the U.S. government. The events described in that letter have major international implications, and to the mass of evidence showing how government agents in the United States have directly and indirectly become criminally involved in drugging the American people.
No response. For
Word
format click here.
Letter to CIA's Director
George Tenet
(February 2, 1998), offering evidence of CIA drug trafficking from a coalition of present and former government
agents, including former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA
financial operations. No response. For
Word
format click here.
The recipients of these letters, by their
cover-ups and obstruction of justice, made possible the continuation of corrupt and criminal activities,
and the human tragedies, described in the
books, Defrauding
America, Drugging
America, and
Unfriendly
Skies. These tragedies include, for instance, the imprisonment of tens of thousands of America's men and women, the
destruction of homes and families, the cancerous expansion of corruption throughout government and throughout society.
Terrorists Are Not the Only Threat To
Americans
The terrorists are not the only adversaries facing the American people.
The imprisonment of tens of thousands of America's men and women, the
destruction of homes and families, that are part of the pattern of drug
smuggling, and its cover-up, reflect other adversaries. But there are many more
corrupt activities against the people, as detailed in the books written by and
with the help of several dozen present and former government agents, which are
described within this web site. The people perpetrating these crimes, and the
people covering up for them, are responsible for:
- The continuation of corrupt and criminal activities described in the
books, Defrauding
America, Drugging
America, and
Unfriendly
Skies. These include the culture aiding and abetting the terrorist
acts of September 11, 2001.
- The continuation of the other misconduct which continue to
inflict great harm upon the American people and continue to subvert the
internal security of the United States. Among the many areas of such corrupt
activities, detailed in the books, is the corruption related to drug
smuggling into the United States by people in government positions,
including the Central Intelligence Agency.
Cover-Ups and Obstruction
of Justice
By ACLU and Legal Fraternity
For over 40 years the cover-ups by the ACLU and the legal fraternity are
detailed in the three books, Unfriendly Skies, Defrauding America, and Drugging
America. These cover-ups permitted the continuation of documented corrupt
activities against the American people and the infliction of great personal and
financial harm upon them. The recorded cover-ups commenced while Rodney Stich
was a federal air safety inspector and continued to cover-up for criminal
activities combined with civil rights violations that involved aviation, drug
smuggling by people acting under cover of their government operations, fraud in
the federal and state courts, and more. By reading the three books, and
examining a federal law suit filed by former federal air safety inspector Rodney
Stich, highlights of the pattern of criminal and civil rights violations by the
legal fraternity, at various state and federal levels, in and out of government,
becomes obvious.
Letter
of March 28, 2000, responding to ACLU cover-up of March 17, 2000. Stich has
records of ACLU cover-ups commencing in the 1960s when he informed the ACLU of
the pattern of corruption within the FAA and the resulting air tragedies. No
meaningful response. For
Word
format click here.
Letter
to ACLU national headquarters, March 17, 2000, reporting the serious
misconduct by federal judges (which involved the ACLU-connected law firm of
Friedman, Sloan and Ross of San Francisco). For
Word
format click here.
ACLU
cover-up letter from San Francisco office of ACLU, March 10, 2000. For
Word
format click here. For
Word
format click here.
ACLU.
Letter to San Francisco office of ACLU, February 15, 2000, reporting
widespread civil rights and criminal violations by federal judges. For
Word
format click here.
Earlier letters, starting in 1964, reveal ACLU cover-ups that made
possible patterns of corruption continuing to inflict great harm upon Americans,
as revealed in the three books. These earlier letters will be uploaded as time
permits.
Letters detailing hard-core criminal activities in key government offices
were sent to the ACLU starting in 1964, followed by total refusal to act on
either the crimes against the United States or the massive civil rights
violations by federal judges that were perpetrated as part of the efforts to
block Stich's reporting of these criminal activities. If the ACLU lawyers had not engaged in the felony cover--ups,
many fatal airline accidents could have been prevented that resulted from the
FAA misconduct, as well as the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings. As time
permits, these earlier letters will be uploaded.
Cover-Ups and Obstruction Of Justice By
Broadcast and Print Media
Forty years of recorded cover-ups and obstruction of justice by
the broadcast and print media relating to the criminal activities detailed in
the three books. These cover-ups made possible grave consequences for the
American public, and continues after the September 11, 2001, terrorist
hijackings. The cover-ups and obstruction of justice constitute adversarial acts
against the American people, compounding the adversaries they face from
terrorists. The following are a sampling of letters sent to
the broadcast and print media offering evidence of the corrupt and criminal
activities.
U.S. News and World Reports, Jim Morris, senior writer, August 16, 2000.
Sent letter and copy of Drugging America and Defrauding America,
which revealed to him and the publisher the criminal activities discovered by
Stich and his group of federal agents. Nothing was done with this information.
September 11 successful terrorist attacks were among the many consequences of
cover-up by the media.
John Birch Society, Alan Scholl, Chief Operations Officer, August 1,
1999. Letter and copy of Drugging America. Reported the corruption
that Stich and his group of other former government agents discovered. No response.
Wall Street Journal November 5, 1998. Stich sent a letter to the
editor of the Wall Street Journal, following an editorial on false child sex
charges. Stich referred to the false sex charges against an FBI agent Richard
Taus when the agent refused to cover up for CIA drug smuggling with the American
Mafia and the drug activities that funded terrorist cells in the New Jersey and
New York areas. No response.
Author's February 23, 1998 letter to CIA's Director
George Tenet,
offering evidence of CIA drug trafficking from a coalition of present and
former government agents. No response.
Letters Relating To DEA Drug Smuggling Operation In
Mexico
Author's April 20, 1998 letter to the Mexican Consul, advising the Mexican
government of a sequestered INS report that described the drug-smuggling
operation at a remote airstrip in Mexico controlled by an agent of the U.S.
Drug Enforcement Administration, the murder of a Mexican national by that DEA
agent after the Mexican cargo handler discovered the identity of the DEA
agent, and the cover-ups and obstruction of justice relating to these matters
by other agents and agencies of the U.S. government. The events described in
that letter have major international implications, and to the mass of evidence
showing how government agents in the United States have directly and
indirectly become criminally involved in drugging the American people.
Author's May 11, 1998
registered
mail letter to President of Mexico, Ernesto Zedillo. The purpose of this
letter was to put him on notice of a criminal operation in Mexico by an agent
of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), the murder of a Mexican
citizen by this DEA agent when the Mexican accidentally discovered the agent's
identity during a drug loading operation at a remote mountainous airstrip east
of Los Mochis, Mexico; and the cover-up of these crimes by other agents and
agencies of the U.S. government. The intent was also to get publicity that
would alert people of the United States as to the criminal and subversive acts
of government personnel.
Author's May 11, 1998 certified mail
letter to
Jesus Reyes Herroles, the Mexican ambassador in Washington, D.C., to
increase the chances of the drug trafficking becoming known to the American
people.
Author's May 24, 1998 certified letter to U.S.
Attorney
General Janet Reno, putting her on notice of the above drug trafficking
and murder by agents of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (a division
of the U.S. Department of Justice.
Companion list of
letters
revealing the widespread reporting, and cover-ups, of crimes against the
American people.
More will be uploaded as time permits.
These charges were being made by a former federal air safety inspector who had
become a central focal point for other government agents to report criminal and
subversive activities. The charges were very specific, and of hardcore
misconduct. The consequences to the United States, and involving the lives and
the deaths of countless numbers of people, required that his evidence be
received. Instead, silence.
Click
here for author's background and qualifications.
IMPORTANT!
Suggestion: Contact in writing the recipients of these letters and ask for
an explanation of why they did not respond. This would include every member of
the Senate and House intelligence committees, and especially why they did not
respond to:
- Warnings of surface-to-air missiles being acquired by terrorists, as
shown by the letter sent to Senator Specter.
- Warnings of a key federal air safety agent who offered testimony and
hard evidence of corruption within the FAA and Justice Department.
If enough people write, and demand a hearing on the matters offered by
former federal air safety agent Rodney Stich and his group of other government
agents, a crisis could arise in government from the impending exposure of
widespread corruption.
Order form to
obtain Drugging America, Defrauding America, and Unfriendly
Skies direct from the publisher with immediate shipment.
For an Electronic book version of Drugging
America, available in Adobe Acrobat for downloading, at the greatly
reduced price of $12, click
here.
If you arrived here from a search engine, click below
to go to home pages with their many other links to related material.
Go to
Defrauding
America home page.
Go to
Drugging
America home page.
Go to
Unfriendly
Skies home page.
Help fund our exposure activities by placing orders for
any amazon.com products through our links.
Return To Beginning