Brief Introduction Into Complicity of Supreme Court Justices In
Corruption Cover-Ups and Resulting National Tragedies

Former federal agent Rodney Stich and his coalition of other former government agents and insiders had sought to report the corrupt activities in the government's aviation safety offices related to a series of specific airline disasters, and also criminal activities in other areas of overt and covert government activities. The authority for doing this was the federal crime reporting statute and the statute that permits any citizen to seek a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and halt unlawful conduct.

In response to these efforts, large numbers of federal judges, Department of Justice personnel, and over 50 lawyers and law firms embarked on multiple schemes to block the reports of the high-level corruption and silence the former federal agent acting as a whistleblower to expose misconduct resulting in major harm, many deaths, and a series of catastrophic events. Click here for more introductory information. In combination, they inflicted great harm through civil, constitutional, criminal, and human rights violations upon a former federal agent, and made possible the continuation of the prior consequences of corruption, cover-ups, and retaliations, some of which are shown below. The need to coordinate these many parallel efforts to block the reporting of very serious high-level corruption, and protect the participants, from 1982 to 2005 as they engaged in conspiracies involving massive and repeated civil, constitutional, and human rights violations, and criminal obstruction of justice and criminal retaliation against a former federal agent and witness, strongly suggests that a powerful group in the federal government was involved. The consequences of their enabling conduct is shown below.

List of Legal Submissions to the United States Supreme Court,
And Direct to the Justices, Over a Period of Many Years, 
Informing of High-Level Corruption and Series of
Resulting Catastrophic Consequences

If the issues are understood, it will be recognized that the judicial records reveal that the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court had been engaging in criminal obstruction of justice and the fallout from such acts have enabled to continue the many areas of corruption in government that government insiders had discovered and brought to the court's attention. Further, that some of the nation's worst catastrophic events have been made possible by the actions of the Justices. this is hard for most people to believe until they take the time to fully understand the facts.

• 1997 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court, which would have exposed a broad pattern of criminal and subversive activities as defined in Stich's books, the third editions of Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America, and Drugging America. This filing would have made a Supreme Court record of these matters, and required the Justices to engage in a documented cover-ups of the grave charges. This petition was submitted on August 15, 1997. It was improperly refused filing, apparently to avoid making a record of the corrupt activities by federal judges over whom the Justices of the Supreme Court have supervisory responsibilities. This tactic repeated the prior pattern, which would be duplicated in the future, of Supreme Court judges blocking the reports of criminal activities and misusing the federal courts as a racketeering tool through judicially perpetrated civil rights violations while concurrently voiding legal and constitutional defenses. Organized crime never had it so good!
  
  
• Petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court submitted on November 10, 2000, under Supreme Court rule 12, Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651, and Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. The court never responded to this petition and never filed it.
  
  
• Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor, submitted on January 5, 2001, under the authority of Supreme Court Rule 12 and Rule 22 providing for application to an individual Justice, and Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Even if relief was denied, a response is required under Supreme Court Rule 22.6, which says: "The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an application." Following their standard practice, the submission was never acknowledged. To have done so would have made a record of the fact that the Justices were made aware of the very serious charges and did nothing about them.
  
  
• Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, submitted on February 15, 2001, under the same authority as in the emergency writ to Justice Sandra O'Connor. Again, no response.
  
   
• Petitions first submitted to the Supreme Court in the early 1980s relating to the criminal activities in the government's aviation safety offices, primarily the FAA and NTSB. Despite their responsibility to receive the reports of criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, and despite their knowledge that federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities were blocking the reports−a federal crime−the justices aided and abetted the criminal acts. Catastrophic consequences continued to occur over the years from the criminal acts being covered up.

Preparing petitions for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court are expensive and time-consuming. They must be prepared in booklet form, and 80 copies must be submitted. Approximately 70 of these copies are distributed to law libraries throughout the United States.  The publicity given to these charges by distributing them in this manner would be another reason why every filing submitted to the Supreme Court since 1983 were refused filing.

Although some of the petitions submitted to the Supreme Court were filed, others were denied filing on sham charges. Once, the claim was made that the spacing did not meet Supreme Court standards, when the changes could not be measured. Another time the Supreme Court blocked filing on the claim that the filing was late (when the facts showed the filing was not late).

To counteract these tactics, Stich sent in separate mailings to each of the justices copies of what was submitted to the clerk of the court, insuring that they were made aware of the criminal misconduct and the cover-up of such federal crimes by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities and vicarious liability.

Issues Raised in Numerous Supreme Court Filings:
1970 to 2005

The issues raised in filings with the U.S. Supreme Court, from 1980 to 2003, included, for instance, the following:

• Under the federal crime reporting statute, federal crimes that former federal agent Rodney Stich and his coalition of former intelligence and law enforcement personnel had discovered during their professional and official duties, involving key people in government and responsible for great harm to the United States.

• Refusal by federal judges to allow the criminal activities to be reported despite the requirement of the federal crime reporting statute to receive the reports as part of their mandatory administrative duties.

• Relief under federal law from the criminal contempt of court orders, prosecution, conviction, for attempting to report the criminal activities, under the mandatory requirement of the federal crime reporting statute. Those retaliatory actions constituted criminal actions involving obstruction of justice, inflicting harm upon a former federal agent for attempting to report high-level corruption associated with a series of harmful, deadly, and catastrophic events.

• Relief under federal law for the unlawful and unconstitutional seizing and liquidating Stich's $10 million in life assets, without any notice of hearing; without a hearing; and without legal cause.

• Relief under federal law for massive civil rights violations repeatedly perpetrated by California judges in a sham lawsuit by a CIA-related law firm that was the beginning of sham lawsuits paralleling the efforts of federal judges and Department of Justice personnel seeking to halt the reporting of ongoing high-level corruption.

Return to:

www.defraudingamerica.com

www.druggingamerica.com

www.unfriendlyskies.com

www.defraudingamericablog.com