New Page 1

<body> List of Legal Submissions to the U.S. Supreme Court If the issues are understood, it will be recognized that the judicial records reveal that the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court had been engaging in criminal obstruction of justice and the fallout from such acts have enabled to continue the many areas of corruption in government that government insiders had discovered and brought to the court's attention. Further, that some of the nation's worst catastrophic events have been made possible by the actions of the Justices. this is hard for most people to believe until they take the time to fully understand the facts. 1997 Petition for Writ of Certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court, which would have exposed a broad pattern of criminal and subversive activities as defined in Stich's books, the third editions of Unfriendly Skies and Defrauding America, and Drugging America. This filing would have made a Supreme Court record of these matters, and required the Justices to engage in a documented cover-ups of the grave charges. This petition was submitted on August 15, 1997. It was improperly refused filing, apparently to avoid making a record of the corrupt activities by federal judges over whom the Justices of the Supreme Court have supervisory responsibilities. This tactic repeated the prior pattern, which would be duplicated in the future, of Supreme Court judges blocking the reports of criminal activities and misusing the federal courts as a racketeering tool through judicially perpetrated civil rights violations while concurrently voiding legal and constitutional defenses. Organized crime never had it so good! Petition for writ of certiorari to U.S. Supreme Court submitted on November 10, 2000, under Supreme Court rule 12, Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651, and Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. The court never responded to this petition and never filed it. Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Sandra O'Connor, submitted on January 5, 2001, under the authority of Supreme Court Rule 12 and Rule 22 providing for application to an individual Justice, and Title 28 U.S.C. § 1651. Even if relief was denied, a response is required under Supreme Court Rule 22.6, which says: "The Clerk will advise all parties concerned, by appropriately speedy means, of the disposition made of an application." Following their standard practice, the submission was never acknowledged. To have done so would have made a record of the fact that the Justices were made aware of the very serious charges and did nothing about them. Petition for emergency writ to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, submitted on February 15, 2001, under the same authority as in the emergency writ to Justice Sandra O'Connor. Again, no response. Petitions first submitted to the Supreme Court in the early 1980s relating to the criminal activities in the government's aviation safety offices, primarily the FAA and NTSB. Despite their responsibility to receive the reports of criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, and despite their knowledge that federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities were blocking the reports--a federal crime--the justices aided and abetted the criminal acts. Catastrophic consequences continued to occur over the years from the criminal acts being covered up. Preparing petitions for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court are expensive and time-consuming. They must be prepared in booklet form, and 80 copies must be submitted. Approximately 70 of these copies are distributed to law libraries throughout the United States. The publicity given to these charges by distributing them in this manner would be another reason why every filing submitted to the Supreme Court since 1983 were refused filing. Although some of the petitions submitted to the Supreme Court were filed, others were denied filing on sham charges. Once, the claim was made that the spacing did not meet Supreme Court standards, when the changes could not be measured. Another time the Supreme Court blocked filing on the claim that the filing was late (when the facts showed the filing was not late). To counteract these tactics, Stich sent in separate mailings to each of the justices copies of what was submitted to the clerk of the court, insuring that they were made aware of the criminal misconduct and the cover-up of such federal crimes by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities and vicarious liability. Deadly Consequences From Supreme Court Misconduct The pattern of documented cover-ups by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court were not simply matters of academic interest. Starting with the Supreme Court misconduct in the 1980s, the cover-ups and obstruction of justice made possible their continuation and the continuation of the grave consequences, as described in the books written by former federal agent Rodney Stich. Free books. For a listing of the books written by former government insiders on the continuing history of corrupt activities responsible for a continuing series of human tragedies, and to download at no charge segments of each of the books, click here. These books are now the latest attempt by a coterie of lawyers and judges seeking to remove from public availability the books that expose their own complicity in the many areas of corrupt activities. Email address for the author and activist against corruption in government: stich@unfriendlyskies.com. For more information relating to the author and his activities put "Rodney Stich" into a search engine such as Google or yahoo.com. The links run into many tens of thousands. Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts. Return to: www.defraudingamerica.com www.druggingamerica.com www.unfriendlyskies.com www.defraudingamericablog.com </body>