monkey

Complicity of California Judges
In Enabling Cover-Up of Crimes Against U.S.

The sham lawsuit filed by the CIA-front law firm and lawyers could not have proceeded without repeated violations of dozens of state and federal laws. The fact that dozens of California judges joined in sham legal actions barred by dozens of California statutes, controlling case law, and federal law, revealed by a powerful force in the federal government was behind the expanding cover-ups and retaliatory actions. The repeated violations by California judges and their huge financial sanctions when Stich exercised objection and appeal remedies left no doubt of their complicity in these matters. Or that they were part of coordinated activities that me the definition of a racketeering enterprise, and that they were contributing to further catastrophic events. The fact that the Friedman lawyers and law firm had CIA connections further showed the strong ties with a powerful group in government, believed to be within the U.S. Department of Justice.

Complicity of California attorney general Lockyer.

Complicity of Federal Judges Enlarging
Upon Their Prior Corruption Cover-Ups

Prior to the start of the sham action by the CIA-front law firm and lawyers, federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors had in three instances blocked the reporting of the criminal activities that Stich sought to report sunder the federal crime reporting statute. After Stich exercised federal remedies seeking a halt to the massive violations of personal and property rights arising from the combination sham filing and the massiv4e violations of law by California judges, Stich filed federal actions that required federal judges to provide a federal court forum and relief. Never before has any action been filed in federal court where so many basic and major civil and constitutional rights were violated.

As if the source of the sham action arose from inside the federal judiciary or the Department of Justice, federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors joined the complicity by violating the several federal remedies intended to halt the civil and constitutional violations that were involved.

Tactics by federal judges to cover up for corrupt and criminal activities that were continuing to inflict great and catastrophic harm upon the United States and its people.

The criminal misuse of federal courts and judicial positions, retaliating against a former federal agent, in efforts to halt the exposure of the criminal and even subversive activities implicating people in key government positions.

Dozens of federal judges were involved in schemes that had tragic and deadly consequences.

Partial list of federal judges directly implicated.
Sample list of federal lawsuits seeking to report the criminal activities that Stich and a group of other former government agents had discovered during their professional official duties.

Sampling of letters sent to federal judges and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Sample list of federal lawsuits seeking to report the criminal activities that Stich and a group of other former government agents had discovered during their professional official duties.

http://www.defraudingamerica.com/sequence_highlights.html.

Sequence of obstruction of justice tactics by lawyers and judges.

Judicial sequence.

Tactics by federal judges to cover up for corrupt and criminal activities that were continuing to inflict great and catastrophic harm upon the United States and its people.

Criminal Contempt of Court Charges
For Legally Reporting Corrupt Activities
That Would Enable 3,000 Deaths

Federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors that had been blocking the reports charged the former federal agent with criminalcontempt of court after Stich filed a federal lawsuit at Sacramento seeking to report the (a) criminal activities related to a series of airline disasters; (b) criminal activities involved in drug smuggling directly involving people associated with the CIA; and (c) for exercising federal defenses to halt the great and irreparable harm resulting from the actions of the CIA-front law firm and California judges.

Justice Department personnel and federal judges directly involved in that tactic included:

U.S. Attorney David Levi, who was promoted to federal judge at Sacramento after the former federal agent was sent to prison.
Magistrate John Moulds, who was promoted to federal judge at Sacramento after Stich's incarceration.
U.S. District Judge Raul Ramirez, who played a major role in protecting the CIA-front law firm, in protecting the scheme, and in obstruction of justice. Ramirez is now a lawyer in Sacramento, where he makes more money as a lawyer than as a federal judge.
U.S. District Judge Milton Schwartz, who first expressed concern about the charges made by Stich, and then a week later, totally reversed himself, dismissing the attempt to report the federal crimes. Schwartz died some time later.
All the judges in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Description of criminal contempt of court in retaliation for attempting to report major and deadly criminal activities.

Seeking Legal Relief in Bankruptcy Court and
Discovering Another Area of High-Level Corruption

The former federal agent and activist was being attacked by a hoard of lawyers involved in massive violations of state and federal law, who were assisted and protected by California judges, federal judges, and federal prosecutors. They stripped him of every level of substantive and procedural due process and protections under the laws and constitution of California and the United States. His life assets were corruptly taken, and his own lawyers repeatedly sabotaged him as they acted to protect their peers.

Finally, with no where else to turn, Stich sought to obtain relief by filing Chapter 11 from the massive civil and constitutional violations that were part of the criminal conspiracy to halt his exposure of high level corruption that by that time had expanded far beyond what he had initial discovered. Under law, relief should have been granted.

Unknown to Stich, books had been written about the nationwide corruption in the bankruptcy courts, that strips the life assets from countless numbers of people who exercise the statutory protections of Chapter 11 (or who are forced into bankruptcy, sometimes by covert CIA personnel.) That experience is described in History of Aviation Disasters: 1950 to 9/11, and in Defrauding America, both by Rodney Stich.

Also seeking to expose the corruption in the Ninth Circuit bankruptcy courts in California was lawyer Dexter Jacobson, who compared notes with Stich. The night before Jacobson was scheduled to provide evidence to FBI personnel in the San Francisco office, he was murdered. Unknown to Jacobson, FBI and other Department of Justice personnel knew about the corruption involved judges, lawyers, Department of Justice trustees, and even CIA assets, and did their usual cover-up.

Years of Complicity By
U.S. Supreme Court Justices

Partial list of papers submitted to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, that made the Justices aware of:

The federal criminal activities that former federal agent Rodney Stich sought to report to a federal judge under the federal crime reporting statute. The Justices knew that the federal judges, over whom they had supervisory responsibilities, were criminally blocking the reports. Further, the Justices had similar responsibilities to receive the information of criminal activities, which were presented to them by Rodney Stich.

In the period from about 1979 to about 1984, petitions were filed by the U.S. Supreme Court in the lawsuits filed by Stich against the FAA and the NTSB. These petitions made serious charges associated with specific airline disasters and deaths, and the felony obstruction of justice by federal judges and Justice Department officials.

Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court knew of the felony retaliation against the former federal agent for exercising the responsibilities to report major federal crimes.

Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court knew of the unlawful and unconstitutional orders by federal judges barring the former federal agent, for the remainder of his life, from filing any papers in any federal district or appellant court.

The justices knew that the orders obstructed justice by blocking his reports of the criminal activities, and voided for him the legal and constitutional defenses necessary to defend against the repeated major civil and constitutional violations by California and federal judges.

The Justices knew of the repeated and massive violations of civil and criminal laws and constitutional protections by federal judges.

The felony retaliation against the former federal agent for exercising the responsibility to report major federal crimes associated with great harm and many deaths.

The felony retaliation against the former federal agent for exercising civil and constitutional defenses against repeated and massive violations of state and federal legal and constitutional rights and protections.

Supreme Court involvement.

Supreme Court index

Another list of submissions to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_kennedy_complicity.html.

One of the Supreme Court Justices involved with the cover-ups was Supreme Court Justice Anthony. Between the time that he was appointed to the U.S. Supreme Court and the date that he left his position as an appellate judge on the 9th Circuit at San Francisco, Stich filed a petition for an emergency writ with Kennedy. (December 27, 1988) (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) That petition raised the following issues:

Stich sought to report to a federal judge under the mandatory requirements of the federal crime reporting statute the criminal activities that he and several other former government agents had discovered in government offices as part of their professional and official duties.
Federal judges repeatedly blocked the reports, constituting criminal acts, with catastrophic and deadly consequences arising from the misconduct.
Federal judges and DOJ prosecutors had charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for attempting to report the crimes, and for exercising federal defenses against the parallel legal schemes that violated large numbers of federally protected rights.
Stich was sentenced to go to prison, and sought a stay of that order.

Kennedy denied the request for relief, thereby aiding and abetting the continuation of the criminal acts; the judicial cover-ups of such criminal acts; the misuse of federal courts to retaliate against a person for attempting to make such reports; and for seeking to halt the great personal and financial harm arising from the combination of retaliation and denial of due process. Kennedy was therefore complicit in the tragedies arising from the continuation of the corrupt and criminal acts. That would include the 3,000 deaths on 9/11 that was made possible by the corruption in the government's aviation safety offices (primary cause of the hijackings) and in the FBI and CIA (where the secondary area of blame existed, affecting their ability or willingness to detect the hijacking scheme.

Some years later, in 2006, Justice Kennedy wrote the leading decision that held that government officials could retaliate against a federal employee for filing a required report that reported corrupt and criminal acts.

Sampling of letters sent to Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.

Years of cover-ups by Supreme Court Justices, who aided and abetted the underlying criminal activities and the felony cover-ups by federal judges over whom the Justices have supervisory responsibilities and vicarious liability.

www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_supreme_court_justices.html.
Partial list of legal filings and submissions to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court.
www.defraudingamerica.com/legal_submissions_supreme_court.html.
Legal submissions to Supreme Court Justices related to major areas of corruption related to series of aviation disasters, terrorist attacks, and other harm to innocent people and to national issues.
www.defraudingamerica.com/ceballos_decision.html.
http://www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_supervisory_responsibilities.html.

Unprecedented Personal Letter from
Supreme Court Justice Bryon White

Personal letter from U.S. Supreme Court Justice Bryon White to former federal agent Rodney Stich apologizing that by himself he was not able to address the matters that Stich brought to his attention. This was an unprecedented admission that the Justices knew of the serious problems; that one of the Justices was disturbed enough that he wrote a letter to Stich lamenting that he was the only Justice willing to act, but was unable to do so with the other Justices refusing to cooperate with him.

Lawsuit Naming Supreme Court Justices
As Defendants on Basis of Criminal Complicity

Unprecedented, but justified on the basis of the documented facts, Stich filed a lawsuit against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. He knew the court system was so corrupt that he could never prevail. However, the intent was to make a judicial record of the involvement of Supreme Court Justices, their response to the lawsuit, and the possibility that media people would give publicity to the lawsuit and in turn publicity to the corrupt and criminal activities Stich sought to expose.

The Justices responded, acknowledging they knew of Stich's charges, that they took no action, and that they were totally immune from lawsuits for their conduct.

Last Pre-9/11 Attempt to Halt the Corrupt Activities
That Shortly Enabled the Nation's
Worst Terrorist Successes

Despite the probability of being again blocked by federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors, and partly due to the additional information from his inside sources about corruption affecting the lives of many people and adversely affecting national security, Stich tried one last time to report what he and his group of other government agents and insiders had discovered.

The lawsuit had multiple federal causes of action, any single one requiring federal judge to receive the information and allow the legal proceedings to go forward. Among the causes of action were:

The attempt to report the criminal activities in the FAA that were still enabling to occur easily preventable airline disasters.
Criminal activities in the FBI and the CIA, which were affecting national security.
The attempt to regain his civil and constitutional rights that were taken by the multiple orders barring him from filing any papers in many federal district or appellate court.
A return of the $10 million in assets that were unlawfully and unconstitutionally seized and liquidated, completing the action first started by the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross and their lawyers.

U.S. District Judge Reed:

Blocked the reporting of the federal crimes.
Blocked Stich's efforts to obtain testimony from the defendants, thereby protecting their involvement in the major crimes.

Before the Reno judge dismissed the action, blocking Stich from reporting the criminal activities, four groups of terrorists hijack four airliners and killed nearly 3,000 people. The hijackings were enabled to occur by the corrupt actions of management in the FAA that blocked from being implemented the known measures to prevent aircraft from being hijacked.

Stich then filed a declaration with the court (January 21, 2002) that further showed the relationship between the wrongful conduct stated in the lawsuit and the hijackings of the four airliners. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Despite this, U.S. District Judge Reed dismissed the lawsuit before it could proceed

Post-9/11 Final Lawsuits Reporting The
Corrupt Activities Making 9/11 Possible

Judge Michael Mukasey Protecting the Corrupt System

The 3,000 deaths that were so easily preventable, and the signs of cover-ups by members of Congress and the 9/11 Commission, caused Stich to again file a federal action under the federal crime reporting statute, attempting once again to report the evidence of criminal activities that enabled terrorists to hijack the four airliners on September 11, 2001.

Again, federal judges blocked the action. The judge who died, Michael Mukasey, would receive the usual reward for being on "the team," cooperating with those in control of the system. After Mukasey retired, President George W. Bush appointed him to the top law enforcement position. United States Attorney General.

Mukasey blocked the lawsuit from being filed, despite the mandatory requirement to file complaints when they are received. It wasn't until 13 months later, after Stich wrote letters to each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, informing them of the latest obstruction of justice by judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities that the lawsuit was filed.

Then, and with apparent approval by the Supreme Court Justices, Mukasey issued an order within minutes of the filing that dismissed the lawsuit. That dismissal violated his mandatory requirement under the federal crime reporting statute to receive the information of federal crimes, and violated dozens of statutes, rules of court, and constitutional protection barring such dismissal without a hearing.

The facts in the matter showed that the future attorney general of the United States was guilty of obstruction of justice and other criminal acts.

Complicity by District of Columbia Judges

By this time, it was obviously clear that despite the 3,000 deaths, federal judges were not going to allow these matters to see the light of day, especially with the involvement of probably over 100 federal judges during the past 30 years and the involvement of so many deaths that they made possible.

However, to make a record, showing the complicity of federal judges in the powerful District of Columbia federal courts, Stich submitted a lawsuit for filing, similar to what he filed in the New York courts. The federal courts refused to file the papers, stating that a prior order by U.S. District Judge Stanley Sporkin forever barred Stich from filing any papers in any federal courts. Sporkin was the former CIA legal counsel during the numerous corrupt activities of CIA personnel during the 1980s, including the massive drug smuggling.

Sampling of Great National Tragedies Caused or Enabled By
The Underlying Corrupt Activities and the Legal-Judicial Attacks

The corruption in the government's aviation safety offices that was responsible for the conditions that enabled a 50-year history of prior preventable airline disasters, including years of terrorist successes.
The corruption within the Department of Justice.
The wide area of corruption detailed in the dozen-plus not-for-profit documentary books written by the head of that coalition of former government agents and insiders. Among the various areas of criminal misconduct described in those books were, for instance:
- Decades of drug smuggling by CIA assets, with the knowledge of personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice and most of the 16 intelligence agencies; false drug charges against innocent people; perjured testimony fabricated by federal prosecutors, etc. See the books, Drugging America and Defrauding America. Also, www.druggingamerica.com.
- Continuing series of financial frauds, some involving covert CIA operations. See the books, Defrauding America; America's Housing and Financial Frauds.
- Corrupt activities with catast6rophic blowback consequences, one example detailed at www.defraudingamerica.com/lockerbie_index.html, and further detailed in the book, Lockerbie to 9/11: Massive Fraud and Consequences.
- Years of forewarned and preventable aviation disasters, including aviation terrorism. See the books, History of Aviation Disasters: 1950 to 9/11, and Lockerbie to 9/11: Massive Fraud and Consequences.
- Corruption and consequences among America's lawyers and judges. See the books, Lawyers and Judges: American Trojan Horses, and others.
- Decades of corruption by members of Congress and the enormous tragic consequences. See the book, Congress and Other Cesspools, and others. Also, History and consequences of congressional cover-ups..
- Decades of corruption and lies by U.S. politicians with harmful, deadly, and catastrophic consequences. One area with deadly consequences were the series of wars resulting in nearly 100,000 dead GIs and many more brutally maimed or injured.

Criminal Laws Violated by Lawyers, Judges,
Supreme Court Justices Whose Coordinated Conduct
Blocked or Impeded Reports of Criminal Activities

The initial violations of laws and constitutional protections were in the California courts as the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross (San Francisco) filed a sham lawsuit against former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to halt his exposure by stripping him of the $10 million in assets that funded his "foolish" activities. This is where large numbers of California judges became criminally implicated in the various schemes seeking to block the reporting of the tragedy-related criminal activities.
When Stich exercised federal remedies in federal courts that were specifically provided for any one of the repeated multiple violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, further laws were violated.
As the original scheme ballooned out of control, it became necessary to repeatedly violated every single one of the many procedural due process rights in California and federal courts.
The massive violations of California and federal laws and constitutional protections arising in the various parallel legal schemes to halt the exposure actions also violated criminal statutes relating to obstruction of justice.

The initial violations of laws and constitutional protections were in the California courts as the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross (San Francisco) filed a sham lawsuit against former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to halt his exposure by stripping him of the $10 million in assets that funded his "foolish" activities. This is where large numbers of California judges became criminally implicated in the various schemes seeking to block the reporting of the tragedy-related criminal activities.
When Stich exercised federal remedies in federal courts that were specifically provided for any one of the repeated multiple violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, further laws were violated.
As the original scheme ballooned out of control, it became necessary to repeatedly violated every single one of the many procedural due process rights in California and federal courts.
The massive violations of California and federal laws and constitutional protections arising in the various parallel legal schemes to halt the exposure actions also violated criminal statutes relating to obstruction of justice.

Evidence Indicates High Government Source Orchestrated
The Multiple Schemes and Protected the Participants

An understanding of the continuing pattern of blatant and repeated violations of the civil and constitutional substantive and procedural due process rights of the former federal agent, and the continued blatant obstruction of justice actions, had to have the protection of a source high in government. Especially since none of the participants in the documented criminal activities ever faced, nor feared, the consequences of their obstruction of justice and other crimes.

That source would be high in the U.S. Department of Justice, the arm of government that has inflicted more harm upon individual Americans than any external terrorist group.

Sample of links to conduct of employees of the U.S. Department of Justice:

Years of murders of American citizens by FBI agents in the New York City and Boston offices, committed in secret relationship with organized crime and Mafia figures (one of which was known as The Killing Machine), and covered up by FBI-DOJ personnel for years. Details in the book, Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, and the Mafia.
The withholding of information on several planned terrorist attacks on major U.S. targets so as to prevent the exposure of the murders. This self-serving act enabled the terrorist attacks to occur, killing nearly 4,000 people.
Comparison of blame for 9/11, with FBI-DOJ personnel being high on the list of enablers.

Lawsuits Against Those Involved In
Cover-Up of High-Level Crimes

Lawsuit filed against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on the basis of their cover-ups, and made primarily to make a government record of the charges and the defendant Justices' responses.

Lawsuit against members of Congress filed in the federal courts at Washington. Lawsuit filed against certain members of Congress on the basis of their cover-up of high-level corruption.

Lawsuit filed against several media sources on the basis of their cover-ups of high level federal crimes, and becoming enablers to the consequences of the criminal activities.

http://www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_supreme_court_justices.html.

Lawsuit against members of congress filed in the Reno, Nevada federal courts.

Anyone Who Knowingly Blocks
Reporting a Federal Crime Commits a Felony

The crime of obstruction of justice does not rest upon whether the charges of criminal activities being blocked are actually true. Any act, and especially a conspiracy of two of more people, that blocks the report of a federal crime is a criminal act. The 23 years of sham lawsuits that knowingly hindered and tried to totally block the former federal agent from reporting the ongoing criminal activities associated with an ongoing series of great harm upon the American people and the nation meets the definition of a conspiracy and a criminal racketeering enterprise.

Sampling of the judicial tactics used to block the reporting and exposure of the tragedy-related corruption implicating people in key government positions.

Obstruction of justice felonies associated with schemes that obstructed justice by blocking a former federal agent from reporting major criminal activities.

Conduct that constitutes a conspiracy under criminal law.

Conduct that constitutes a criminal racketeering enterprise (RICO).

The criminal acts arising from the retaliation for attempting to report criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, and the criminal acts arising from retaliation for exercising federal defenses against the massive civil rights violations associated with the parallel legal efforts to halt Stich's exposure activities.

Other criminal statutes that made the judicial acts repeated felonies.

Obstructing justice statutes. Federal judges were repeatedly guilty of these crimes, for which they were not only not immune, but guilty of greater offenses because of their position of trust.

Other criminal statutes that made the judicial acts repeated felonies.

Obstructing justice statutes. Federal judges were repeatedly guilty of these crimes, for which they were not only not immune, but guilty of greater offenses because of their position of trust.

Letters Reporting Corruption Indicates
Widespread Knowledge of Prior Consequences

The following are a partial list of letters that former federal agent Rodney Stich wrote, starting while he was still with government, seeking to report corrupt, criminal, and even subversive activities, that were continually resulting in major tragedies, deaths, and harm to national security. Not a single meaningful response was ever received!

List showing a sampling of letters, which will be expanded as time permits.
List showing a sampling of letters to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. These letters, and the filings that were submitted to the Justices, made them fully aware of the extent of the corruption in government offices since approximately 1978, and continuing to this date.
List showing a sampling of letters to members of Congress.
List showing a sampling of letters to media people.
List showing a sampling of letters to lawyers.
List showing a sampling of letters to White House personnel.
List showing a sampling of letters to FBI-DOJ personnel.

List showing a sampling of letters, which will be expanded as time permits.
List showing a sampling of letters to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. These letters, and the filings that were submitted to the Justices, made them fully aware of the extent of the corruption in government offices since approximately 1978, and continuing to this date.

Powerful Force in Government Orchestrating The
Multiple Cover-Ups and Retaliatory Actions

To understand the following subject, take a look at the introduction to systemic corruption in the United States, the efforts of several courageous former government agents, and the enormous number of people and groups protecting the guilty. That will help understand the existence of a powerful group in government that was orchestrating the retaliatory actions to prevent the information becoming known to the American people.

The evidence indicates that a powerful force in government was orchestrating the multiple parallel actions that blocked the reporting of high-level corruption, and that force was properly key people in the U.S. Department of Justice. Examples of these indicators included the following:

Years of cover-ups by Department of Justice employees when informed of the corruption.
Years of cover-ups by members of Congress when informed of the corruption.
Repeated cover-up by federal judges when former federal agent Rodney Stich filed federal actions under the federal crime reporting statute seeking to report to a federal judge the major corrupt and criminal activities in key government positions associated with a series of major aviation disasters and later involving national security harm.
Series of sham lawsuits filed by a hoard of lawyers that involved massive and unprecedented violations of state and federal laws, followed by repeated additional violations by a large number of California judges.
Unprecedented judicial retaliation for exercising legally-prescribed defenses.
Repeated protection of the massive violations of state and federal laws by federal judges.
Series of illegal and unconstitutional orders by federal district and appellate judges permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. These orders knowingly blocked Stich and his coalition of former intelligence and law enforcement personnel from reporting as required by law the federal offenses that they discovered during their official duties, and blocked Stich from defending against the massive violation being inflicted by a hoard of lawyers and California judges.
Corruptly, and in gross violation of federal laws and constitutional protections, federal judges corruptly seized, without a hearing and without cause, the $10 million in assets that funded the attempts to halt the tragedy-enabling high-level corruption.
Charging Stich with criminal contempt of court for attempting to report criminal activities that were enabling to occur a series of major aviation disasters—and other harm—and would make possible several major terrorist attacks, including the 9/11 hijackings. That retaliation against Stich enabled the corruption that had already enabled many deaths to occur, enabled the corruption in such areas as the government's aviation safety offices, the FAA, responsible for preventing aviation disasters, including terrorist attack, and within the Department of Justice to continue. Evidence that is little-known to the American people shows gross misconduct in these two groups as having been the primary enablers of a series of horrific terrorist attacks, including the hijacking of four airliners on September 11, 2001.
30-years of federal judges blocking the reports of high-level criminal activities in which they themselves become complicit through cover-ups.
Repeated complicity, from 1980 to 2005, by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, as they aided and abetted each of these and many other instances that were brought to their attention through legal filings and letters.
For these monumental repeated violations of criminal statutes, of major civil and constitutional rights, to continue, knowingly sacrificing lives and national security, required a powerful force in government. And that is believed to be primarily within the U.S. Department of Justice, easily accommodated by a culture of systemic corruption and systemic cover-ups in the United States.

The lawyers, whose actions hindering the exposure of the high-level corruption by activist Rodney Stich, paralleled the block by federal judges and Department of Justice personnel, appeared to be acting for a powerful force somewhere in the federal government. Their actions were similar to the thugs in Egypt hired by the government officials in power, called "Baltagiya," or the hired thugs in Iran called "Basij"

Life in United States As it Really Exists In
In Series of Documentary Books by Insiders

Most people in the United States are so badly uninformed due to U.S. media protection of high-level corruption and have been so dumbed down with trivial matters and political nonsense that the decades of corruption and resulting harm are unknown. This corruption and consequences have been documented in books written b y the head of the coalition of former government agents and other insiders, Rodney Stich in the many books that he wrote since 1978.