History of frauds by lawyers and judges--and resulting aviation disasters.

<body> Overview of Parallel Schemes Blocking Reporting High-Level Corruption This page is one of many that describes a 40-year pattern of multiple schemes to block a former federal agent and his coalition of other insiders from revealing to the public a series of corrupt and criminal activities involving people in key government positions, and their conduct as enablers of a series of continuing great national tragedies. In a nutshell: Initial discovery of ongoing corruption resulting in a continuing series of aviation disasters, and then followed by discovery of other areas of criminal activities that constituted major crimes against the United States. After encountering a block to reporting the information at every level of government (i.e., obstruction of justice), former federal agent, motivated by the horror resulting from the corrupt acts, made multiple attempts to inform the American people of the matters with the expectation that they would be interested, be outraged, and help to bring a halt to the corruption. That former federal agent filed a series of federal actions under the requirements of the federal crime reporting statute. That statute requires that anyone who knows of a federal crime to "report it to a federal judge or other federal official." A federal judge must receive information of a federal crime that is reported to the judge as part of the judge's mandatory administrative duties. After making such report to a federal judge, the judge is then required to provide the information to a government law enforcement department that is not themselves implicated in the federal crimes. Every attempt to report the criminal activities which he and his coalition were discovering were blocked by federal judges. Stich's circumvented the judicial block by publishing books on the corruption−including the names of the judges blocking the information−and the aviation disasters that followed and made possible by the judicial cover-ups. Shortly thereafter, in 1982, there started a series of sham lawsuits by attorneys that continued without interruption until 2005. Over 50 lawyers and law firms engaged in the costly litigation that knowingly blocked the reporting and publicizing of the high-level corruption related to a continuing series of aviation disasters; the corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, and the criminal activities discovered in other areas of overt and covert government operations. This page provides a segment of the information and documents related to these matters. Hoard of Lawyers and Law Firms Filing Sham Lawsuits to Halt Exposure Actions Continuously from 1982 to 2005, over fifty lawyers and law firms were involved in a series of sham lawsuits against former federal agent Rodney Stich that knowingly hindered the reporting and halting of ongoing corrupt and criminal activities resulting in a continuing series of tragic, sometimes deadly, and sometimes catastrophic events affecting the American people and the nation. These were crimes against the United States. This page is one of over a thousand at this site that details and documents the schemes involving the legal fraternity. Scheme initiated by the San Francisco CIA-FBI-related law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross, and their lawyers, starting in 1982. Extending the scheme by a government-related law firm in South Carolina, using a possible wife murderer as a plaintiff in a sham lawsuit against the former federal agent. That scheme was commenced after the lawyers had seen the consequences of the prior legal attacks on 9/11. Those four terrorist attacks were made possible by the corruption that the former federal agent sought to expose and halt: The corruption in the government's aviation safety offices that was responsible for the conditions that enabled a 50-year history of prior preventable airline disasters. The corruption within the Department of Justice, that the former federal agent sought to report. The cover-ups by people responsible for the nation's check and balances. The long series of sham lawsuits by lawyers that knowingly hindered the reporting and halting of the ongoing deadly corruption. Additional lawyers and law firms joined the ongoing conspiracy, and focused on attempting to seize the books that described the corruption and the parties involved. Those books identified not only the underlying corruption and parties but also those who engaged in cover-ups and retaliation, being primarily federal judges and Department of Justice employees. By that time the facts made obvious that these attempts by lawyers, judges, and Department of Justice personnel were engaging in one or more orchestrated conspiracies and that they met the legal criteria for a criminal racketeering RICO crime. Initial Attempts to Judicially Report the Corruption The first attempt to use the courts to circumvent the total cover-ups was by filing an action in the federal courts in San Francisco, and the first series of attempts focused on the continuing corruption in the FAA that was resulting in a continuing series of major aviation disasters, and the cover-ups by the political National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB). (At that time it was called the Civil Aeronautics Board). Lawsuit Seeking to Report FAA Corruption Related to Specific Airline Disasters The first legal filing was assigned to U.S. District Court Judge Robert Schnacke. Lawyers for the U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion to have the attempt to report the federal crimes dismissed. They argued in their motion that former federal agent Rodney Stich lacked standing to file the action. The federal crime reporting statute, which was one of the statutes Stich relied upon for filing, states that anyone who knows of a federal crime must report it to a federal judge or other official. Obviously, anyone who knows of a federal crime has standing, and it that person doesn't exercise that "standing," he or she commits a felony. In the book, Drugging America: A Trojan Horse that Stich later wrote, he described the prosecution of a young black girl and the mother of a little girl that the same U.S. attorney charged with obstructing justice for not reporting to federal officials one side of a telephone conversation she overheard concerning drugs. And the same federal judges sentenced her to five years in prison! Judge Schnacke, after admitting the seriousness of the charges, then dismissed the attempt to report the continuing federal crimes in the government's aviation safety offices. That action, combined with the U.S. attorney, constituted criminal obstruction of justice and made them early enablers to a continuing series of major American aviation disasters. Stich then filed a notice of appeal, filed appeal arguments, and then appeared for oral argument before a three-judge Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel. One of the judges admitted the gravity of the charges, stated that it was the responsibility of Congress to investigate these matters. Stich responded that every member of Congress, who also admitted the gravity of the charges, refused to get involved, stating the matters were not in their areas of responsibilities. Stich added that he wasn't expecting the courts to conduct an investigation; he was primarily interested in presenting the evidence into a judicial record, which would then be turned over to whatever government entity had a responsibility to conduct an investigation. (Stich v. United States, et al, 554 F.2d 1070 (9th Cir.).) Stich then filed an appeal (known as a petition for writ of certiorari with the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, which included filing copiers of all the papers filed in the district and appellate courts. The filing of that petition put the Justices on notice of major ongoing crimes against the United States and notified the Justices of the obstruction of justice conduct by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities. The federal crime reporting statute also required them to receive the information. Further, the perpetration of the crime of obstruction justice by judges in the federal courts was a serious matter affecting major national interests. Despite the requirements of the federal criminal statutes, the responsibility of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, the ongoing corruption and the ongoing resulting brutal aviation disasters didn't register with them. They dismissed the petition without allowing it to be heard. (Stich v. United States, et al, 554 F.2d 1070 (9th Cir.) (table), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 920 (1977)). Lawsuit Reporting Cover-Up By NTSB Political Board Members Another lawsuit was filed against the political National Transportation Safety Board in 1977 on the basis of the criminal cover-up of the corruption in the FAA that was enabling the aviation-safety corruption to continue, with the resulting continuation of major aviation disasters. That action was dismissed, blocking Stich from providing evidence to support the serious charges. (Stich v. National Transportation Safety Board, 685 F.2d 446 (9th Cir.) (table), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 920 (1977) In 1978, a Pacific Southwest Airline (PSA) jet crashes into San Diego. Stich discovered serious misconduct consisting of all-night drinking and partying by the flight crew prior to the 7 a.m. departure. This information was covered up by the political NTSB board members. NTSB board members apparently feared that if the public received that knowledge that the outrage would bring attention to the corruption in the FAA that Stich had been trying to expose−and reveal the cover-ups by NTSB board members of these serious matters. That action was assigned to U.S. District Judge Browning. Initially, assistant U.S. attorney George Stoll supported the filing, and even called Stich at home, stating his concern over the matter, and stating that the was requesting approval from his Washington superiors to support the filing. Stoll wasn't aware of the long series of cover-ups by Department of Justice personnel, starting while Stich was still a federal agent had even appeared before a federal grand jury in Denver, over Justice Department objections. A week after Stoll was supporting the filing, he suddenly reversed his position and filed a motion for the judge to dismiss the action. The judge then repeated the prior judicial obstruction of justice tactic and dismissed the lawsuit. Against, Stich filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court, and again, the Justices refused to hear the action. Stich v. National Transportation Safety Board, 685 F.2d 446 (9th Cir.)(table), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 861 (1982). Subsequent aviation disasters from FAA corruption, even worse than what Stich was trying to expose, occurred. Judicial records now showed a series of federal judges involved in obstruction of justice crimes that enabled to occur some of the nation's worst aviation disasters. It was now necessary to expand on the cover-ups. The details are found in Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries. Amicus Curiae Brief in DC-10 Disaster The continuing corruption in the FAA−made possible by the cover-ups−continued theconditions responsible for the continuing aviation disasters. The harbinger of the corruption in the same FAA region that was most heavily involved was also responsible for the certification of the DC-10. A series of near catastrophic events finally resulted in the forewarned and expected crash of a DC-10 near Paris. The litigation into that disasters occurred in the federal courts in Los Angeles. Stich had inside information about the pattern of corruption by the same people certifying that aircraft that he felt obligated to file a friend-of-the-court brief. This required obtaining the approval of the lead attorney in the multi-litigation. That approval was given. Stich filed a friend of the court brief in the Paris DC-10 crash litigation, offering evidence of a pattern of FAA corruption that would explain why the major safety defects on the DC-10 were part of the politics of air safety in the FAA Western Region. That filing was promptly dismissed by the federal judge. If he hadn't dismissed that filing, the prior cover-ups by federal judges−that enabled the corruption in the FAA to continue, which obviously played a key role in certifying an aircraft that had major safety design faults, would have been revealed. Stich filed a notice of appeal, encountering the same block, and then filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. Again, the Justices refused to hear the action, thereby continuing to support the obstruction by lower court judges. (Flanagan v. McDonnell Douglas Corporation and United States of America, Civil Action 74-808-PH, MDL 172, Central District California.) Reporting Additional Criminal Activities Again Blocked by Federal Judges The first of many books by Rodney Stich on corruption in government was published in m1978, which was then followed by his appearance as guest and expert on hundreds of radio and TV shows. This publicity resulted in a continuing series of other government agents and insiders contacting Stich and providing him with information on criminal activities in overt and covert government operations that they had either discovered as part of their official duties or in which they were directly involved. In 1986, as some media sources were making reference to some of these covert activities, Stich filed the first of another series of legal actions seeking to report to a federal court the federal crimes, as required to be reported by the federal crime reporting statute. From then on, the judicial obstruction of justice not only increased, but was compounded by various retaliatory actions seeking to permanently end his efforts. The first action was filed in the federal courts at Sacramento, California, in 1986, and combined the attempts to report the criminal activities with an attempt to exercise federal defenses to halt the parallel obstruction-of-justice tactics involving the sham lawsuits that were first filed by the CIA-FBI-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross and their lawyers. That action was assigned to U.S. District Judge Milton Schwartz. At the first hearing, Schwartz showed concern about the gravity of the charges and urged Stich to obtain the help of a lawyer, setting a date for the next hearing. The federal crime reporting statute makes no requirement that a lawyer−who doesn't know the details of the criminal acts being reported−to be involved, or that the thousands of dollars in legal bills be incurred by the person seeking to report the crimes. A month later, Judge Schwartz−apparently having been contacted by the high force in government orchestrating the various obstruction of justice tactics−issued an order, without the legally required notice of hearing or hearing, dismissing the lawsuit and barring the former federal agent from filing any papers in any federal court. That unlawful order: Obstructed justice and was a felony under the federal crime reporting statute. Protected the CIA-FBI-front law firm and lawyers from their repeated massive violations of state and federal laws and enabled their scheme to continue. Enabled the corruption in the FAA to continue, along with the continuing series of major aviation disasters, and enabled the criminal activities in covert and overt operations to continue, along with the danger to national security. Additional Discoveries Of High-Level Criminal Activities Shortly thereafter, with rumors appearing in the media about the October Surprise operation, covert arms shipments by the Bush administration to the rebels seeking to overthrow the Nicaraguan government, the massive drug smuggling by CIA assets involved in those operations, Stich started hearing from CIA people and some of the drug smugglers working for the CIA. They provided him with details, including names of people involved, where the drugs were off-loaded, the time and places for meetings involved in the October Surprise operations. These were major crimes against the United States, for which any citizen had a responsibility to report them to a government department that was not themselves involved. That eliminated reporting the matters to people in control of the political Department of Justice. In accordance with the federal crime reporting statute, Stich again filed papers in the federal courts at Sacramento, seeking to report the crimes. That filing ignored the illegal and unconstitutional order by Judge Swartz barring the former federal agent from filing any papers in any federal court. Swift Retaliation by Judges And DOJ Prosecutors That filing was assigned to U.. District Judge Raul Ramirez. He, and U.S. Attorney David Levi, promptly charged Stich with criminal contempt of court and sought to have him imprisoned for 18 months. Stich was denied a jury trial, and tried and convicted before the same groups that were involved in the criminal activities that Stich and his coalition sought to report. Also involved in the prosecution of that former federal agent was U.S. Magistrate John Moulds; district court judges Edward Garcia and Lowell Jensen. Jensen was previously involved in the Iran-Contra scandals and also the self-enrichment scheme by Justice Department lawyers to corruptly seize the Inslaw software and place it in a company in which they had a financial interest. Details are in the book, Defrauding America. Judges and DOJ Corruptly Seized The Assets That Funded Exposure Activities While the 68-year-old former federal agent was in prison, federal judges corruptibly seized and started liquidate the assets that the former federal agent used to fund his attempts to halt the corruption through publicity. Federal judge Robert Jones in Las Vegas seized the assets without the required notice of hearing, a hearing, and legally required cause. He then placed the assets under the control of Department of Justice trustee Charles Duck. (Media publicity based on his massive looting of bankruptcy court assets forced the U.S. attorney to file token charges against him.) Federal judge Robert Jones, Oakland, California, then issued orders barring Stich from filing any objection to the seizure and liquidation of assets, while he distributed the assets to the lawyers that were filing she sham lawsuits seeking to halt his exposure activities. When Stich did file objections, ass legally and constitutionally permitted, Jones unfiled them, and then charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for objecting to the seizure and liquidation of his life assets. Details of the massive corruption in the federal bankruptcy courts, that rarely get publicity, is in the book, Defrauding America. Same Tactics by District of Columbia Judges In the early 1990s, the former federal agent attempted to circumvent the judicial corruption in the 9th Circuit courts in San Francisco by filing papers in the federal courts in the District of Columbia. He encountered the same almost instant dismissal of the actions. One of the judges dismissing the attempt to report the corruption was Lawrence Silberman, a judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals in the District of Columbia, preventing Stich and his coalition from exposing drug trafficking, savings and loan fraud, among others, involving CIA assets. Another judge blocking the reporting of these matters was U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Stanley Sporkin. Sporkin was earlier head legal counsel for the CIA, legal counsel for the covert CIA operation, Southern Air Transport, and identified by Terry Reed in his book, Compromised, as involved in CIA Arkansas drug smuggling activities. On September 11, 2001, the District of Columbia would experience one of the many consequences of their earlier cover-ups. Lawsuits filed in the 1990s in the Washington courts 1990s Judicial Blocks in New York City Also in the early 1990, former federal agent Stsich sought to find a judge willing to receive the information by filing in the federal courts in New York City. Some of the same areas of corruption that Stich sought to report to federal judges in New York City were the same areas of corruption responsible for the conditions enabling 19 terrorists to inflict the great terrorist attack in the nation's history, killing nearly 3,000 people in the city. Lawsuits filed in the 1990s in the federal courts in New York City, seeking to make the same reports, and blocked from doing so. Endless Series of Judicial Blocks In 1990, as former federal agent Rodney Stich was being released from prison for the earlier prison sentence resulting from his attempts to expose the corruption, federal judges in San Francisco again charged him with criminal contempt of court. That latest retaliation involved U.S. District Court judges Marilyn Petal and Vaughn Walker. Assisting them was district court judge Samuel Conti. For five years, Stich was under restricted house arrest, until suddenly, in 1995 the charges were suddenly dropped. Last Attempt Before 9/11 A year before the 9/11, Stich made one last attempt to report the corruption that by than involved much worse misconduct than simply that in the FAA. Stich filed a federal action in the U. S. district court in Reno, Nevada, which was assigned to U.S. district judge Edward C. Reed, Jr. That lawsuit raised several major federal causes of action that, if federal law was followed, barred Reed from dismissing the action. These causes of actions included: Attempt to report federal crimes as specifically provided by the federal crime reporting statute. These crimes included: The ongoing corruption in the government's aviation safety offices. the criminal cover-up of these crimes by federal judges, and the complicity of a hoard of lawyers and California judges. Relief from the orders that (a) deprived him for the remainder of his life the right to the protections in law and the Constitution through access to the federal courts. Return of the $10 million in assets that under Supreme Court decision could be sought at any time in any court if the assets were seized in violation of basic constitutional protections. Financial damages against the hoard of lawyers that had been filing sham lawsuits in an effort to halt his exposure activities. As part of his discovery rights, Stich filed Request for Admissions that required all of the defendants to answer questions that would, if answered, have admitted the roles that they played in the various parts of the conspiracy to cover up for major criminal activities. Judge Reed protect the defendants from answering the discovery questions. Shortly before Judge Reed dismissed the action, another consequence of the corruption and cover-ups occurred: Four groups of terrorists hijacked four airliners and killed nearly 3,000 people. It was obvious to Reed that the information that he was preventing from being reported had made possible the 9/11 attacks. He then rendered an order, without a hearing, dismissing the action, thereby protecting the enablers of 9/l1, and those that were not named as defendants in that lawsuit: It is hereby ordered that motion to dismiss filed July 6, 2000, by defendants Federal Judges Milton Schwartz, Raul Ramirez, John Moulds, Marilyn Patel, Vaughn Walker, Robert Jones, and Edward Jellen, is granted. The Federal Judges have absolute immunity. Judges are immune from damage actions for judicial acts taken within the jurisdiction of their courts. Moreover, judges are absolutely immune from a § 1983 or Bivens liability even when such acts are in excess of their jurisdiction and are alleged to have been done maliciously or corruptly. The acts complained of by plaintiffs were not in the clear absence of all jurisdiction or non judicial in nature. An act is judicial if it is a function normally performed by a judge and the parties dealt with the judge in his or her judicial capacity. Stich filed a notice of appeal, paid the filing fees, and submitted the required filing papers. But Ninth Circuit court of appeal judges, who played major roles in the many years of judicial cover-ups, in a February 5, 2002 order, refused to allow the appeal to proceed. They claimed that prior orders of district and appellate judges permanently denying Stich the right to court access, as available to everyone else−including murderers and terrorists−did not apply to Stich. That February 5, 2002, appellate court order was made after those judges had seen the catastrophic consequences of their earlier cover-ups, and disregarded the future consequences of their conduct. Post-911 Cover-Up of 9/11 Enablers Self protection required federal judges to continue the cover-ups, ignoring the consequences that the long series of catastrophic events would be continued by their conduct. The damn-the-consequences were repeated after 9/11 by district and appellate judges in New York City and the District of Columbia: After 9/11, Stich filed a lawsuit under the federal crime reporting statute to report the corruption and the people whose documented misconduct played major roles in the conditions that enabled 19 terrorists to so easily hijack four airliners. The lawsuits addressed the specific misconduct of the following: The long-standing culture of certain key people in the government's aviation safety offices that were primarily responsible for the 9/11 hijackings. The documented felonies by federal judges. These included the repeated and documented obstruction-of-justice crimes and the crimes related to the retaliation against a former federal agent and witness to block his reports of the very same criminal activities as were involved in the 9/11 attacks. The documented role of federal prosecutors, including their cover-ups and their retaliation against a former federal agent. The years of sham lawsuits against the former federal agent by a hoard of lawyers in schemes paralleling the obstruction of justice tactics by federal judges and employees of the U.S. Department of Justice. Related files: Lawsuit filed in the federal courts in New York City after 9/11. Lawsuits filed in the federal courts in the District of Columbia after 9/11. In both cases, every judge to which the lawsuit was filed, dismissed them without the requirements of a hearing, which was then followed by every judge in the court of appeal circuit did the same. Stich then submitted papers for filing to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, and they did the same. The extent of thee corruption, the severity of the consequences, made it necessary for everyone in government that was contacted by the former federal agent to continue the cover-up so as to prevent the American people from discovering and understanding the enormity of what was being done to them by their leaders. Decades of Complicity By Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court The judicial scandal becomes more serious, and reveals at least one of the powerful forces in government protecting the perpetrators. Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court have repeatedly aided and abetted the criminal and subversive activities that Stich and his coalition of government agents sought to expose and correct. Stich repeatedly notified Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court of the underlying corruption, and the obstruction of justice tactics of federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities, and also the felony misuse of federal courts to retaliate against Stich for attempting to report the criminal activities and for exercising federal defenses against the massive civil and constitutional violations that were parallel efforts to obstruct justice. Repeatedly, Stich filed federal actions in U.S. District Courts seeking to report to federal courts the high-level criminal activities, such as CIA drug trafficking and the judicial corruption in bankruptcy courts, and was blocked from doing so. He even suffered judicial retaliation in the form of contempt-of-court charges and sentences and the seizure of his life's assets. In each of these cases he brought the matters to the U.S. Supreme Court in petitions for writ of certiorari. In each case, the Justices of the Supreme Court refused to correct the serious violations of federal criminal statutes and due process rights, and refused to act when they themselves were made aware of the criminal activities brought to them under federal crime-reporting statutes, including Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4. Under federal criminal statutes, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court are criminally implicated in many of the criminal activities described in author Rodney Stich's books. Under federal crime reporting statutes, and especially the very important Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, anyone knowing of a federal crime is himself or herself guilty of a crime if that person does not promptly report the crime/s to a federal judge or other federal official. Hoard of Lawyers as Major Enablers In 1982, after the second edition of Unfriendly Skies was published, which named federal judges that blocked the reporting of the ongoing corruption in the government's aviation safety offices−and listed several major airline disasters that were made possible by the cover-ups−a CIA-FBI-front law firm in San Francisco filed a sham lawsuit against the former federal agent that violated and was barred by large numbers of California and federal statutes, controlling case law, rules of court, and constitutional protections. The lawyers involved in that sham litigation knew that they were halting the efforts by that former federal agent to report the ongoing deadly corrupt activities. Their sham lawsuits were aided and abetted by over a dozen California judges, and which continued from 1982 to 1986. Their sham lawsuits were then followed by others, first by a government-related law firm in South Carolina and then was later followed by sham lawsuits filed by lawyers in the Los Angeles area. Start of the legal actions by the CIA-FBI front law firm in San Francisco. Index of lawyer activity. Laws violated by California judges. California judges implicated. Are Lawyers Complicit in 3000 Deaths? Consider the following: Without addressing the other areas affected by the criminal activities that Stich and his group of former government agents sought to report, and addressing only the corruption that affected the aviation environment: IF the culture and corruption within the FAA did in fact exist (as overwhelming documentation shows), which included a history of blocking the implementation of procedures addressing the known safety problems, such as hijackings); It would explain why the known and obviously long overdue measures to prevent the hijackings of the four airliners on 9/11 were not taken; And the preventative measures to prevent airline hijackings did exist (and Stich made such recommendations); And the need for such preventative measures was obvious from years of airline hijackings, plus the knowledge that airline hijackings were planned by Middle East terrorists); And if lawyers did engage in legal actions knowing that they were blocking his reports, and most probably, intended to block the reports; It becomes obvious that the long overdue preventatives measures were blocked by the legal tactics which constituted criminal obstruction of justice; It then becomes obvious that if a citizen had perpetrated a minute fraction of these offenses that he would be criminally prosecuted for complicity in events that led to the 9/11 hijackings and 3,000 deaths. And these were only one-day's consequences, and only in the aviation area. If these lawyers are guilty of any complicity in these events, we also have the complicity of the dozens of members of Congress who knew not only about the underlying criminal activities, but also the criminal obstruction of justice and criminal retaliation against the former federal agent. And the others, in the media and elsewhere, who also knew! Talk about the ugly Americans, what about the criminal Americans! The next question: What are you going to do about this blatant criminal and even subversive conduct by dozens of lawyers? Sampling of additional related files Enablers to major national tragedies. Index to sampling of files on the 9/11 terrorist attacks.. Comparison of blame for the conditions enabling 19 terrorists to so easily hijack four airliners on 9/11, when advance notice had been received of the attacks. Involvement of a hoard of lawyers and law firms that assisted in crimes against the United States. More thorough picture of the joint schemes by lawyers and federal judges in parallel corrupt actions to prevent the people from learning about endemic corruption, endemic cover-ups, and a history of great harm to the American public. Laws violated by the first series of lawyers in the sham California lawsuit. Sampling of the lawyers and judges acting in a conspiracy. Obstruction of justice felonies associated with schemes that obstructed justice by blocking a former federal agent from reporting major criminal activities. Conduct that constitutes a conspiracy under criminal law. Conduct that constitutes a criminal racketeering enterprise (RICO). Other felonies that involved certain of the enablers. Lawsuits reporting continuing corruption and continuing tragedies. Lawsuits reporting corruption related to series of aviation disasters. Lawsuits to report corruption. Miscellaneous legal briefs. Miscellaneous legal filings. Tactics by over 50 lawyers and law firms whose sham lawsuits knowingly halted the reporting of corrupt activities responsible for such catastrophic effects as the series of terrorist attacks, including 9/11. Index to the sham legal schemes by the hoard of lawyers and law firms seeking to block the exposure of corruption that caused or enabled to occur the 9/11 hijackings and other catastrophic events. Sampling of legal papers sent to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, followed by 30 years of cover-ups and three decades or deadly consequences. List of informational ads on systemic corruption in U.S. government positions, purchased by former federal agent Rodney Stich, seeking to circumvent the systemic cover-ups. List of Miscellaneous Legal Files List of legal files. List of legal files one. List of Supreme Court filings reporting the corruption and judicial involvement in felony cover-ups and felony retaliations. List of sequence. Initial legal attacks to halt exposing high level corruption. Second phase of legal attacks. Third phase of legal attacks Parallel attacks by federal judges and Department of Justice: Criminal contempt of court for attempting to report ongoing corruption against the United States and the resulting great harm, deaths, and catastrophic consequences. Enormity of the consequences enabled by the corruption, the cover-ups, and the legal, judicial, and DOJ attacks. Years of complicity by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Legal brief relating to 9/11-related corruption. List of legal briefs List of legal files Miscellaneous legal filings related to corruption and tragedies. 23 years of attacks by hoard of lawyers using sham lawsuits to halt exposure of high-level corruption and related aviation disasters, terrorist attacks, and other harm. Legal schemes by hoard of lawyers, Judges, and DOJ employees, successfully blocking exposure of corruption that enabled successful terrorist attacks and other harm to national security. Sampling of letters sent to lawyers over the years advising them of the corruption. Sampling of letters sent to ACLU over the years advising their lawyers of the deadly criminal activities discovered by government agents, followed by cover-ups. Legal scheme to halt exposure of high-level corruption discovered by former federal agent Rodney Stich and his coalition of other government agents. Sequence of obstruction of justice tactics by lawyers and judges. Legal submissions to Supreme Court Justices related to major areas of corruption related to series of aviation disasters, terrorist attacks, and other harm to innocent people and to national issues. List of legal files revealing bizarre schemes to halt the exposure of high level corruption related to a series of resulting tragedies, including deaths in aviation disasters and terrorist successes. Legal fraternity attacks upon a former federal agent knowingly blocking the continued exposure of high level corruption, that then enabled a series of catastrophic events to occur. Lawyers and Judges in Parallel Schemes to halt exposure of high-level corruption Sampling of Prior Consequences Known To Federal Judges Most of the above catastrophic events occurred on the program for which FAA air carrier operations inspector Rodney Stich had been given the assignment to correct the conditions responsible for the worst series of airline disasters in the nation's history. Pictures of many other crashes are not shown. Horrors Associated With Aviation Disasters Many factors motivated former federal agent Rodney Stich to continue fighting the seemingly hopeless David vs. Goliath battle to halt the corruption and resulting tragedies. In the beginning, when the primary consequences were the steady stream of preventable and usually forewarned aviation disasters, the motivation included concern over the horrors experienced by people involved in the actual aviation disaster, and the lifetime of emotional and financial pain suffered by family members. In two of the aviation disasters on programs for which Stich had direct and almost sole federal safety responsibility were survivable crashes at Salt Lake City and at Denver. In both crashes, everyone survived virtually unharmed, but then many burned to death due to the major safety problems, safety violations, and even criminal falsification of government required safety reports that falsely stated that important training and competency check requirements had been met. Having one or two such brutal consequences occur in an area for which a government agents had a solemn duty to prevent was enough to start Stich on what turned out to be the impossible quest. Sampling of Subsequent Catastrophic Events Details about the FBI-DOJ cover-ups and the contacts between the al Qaeda operative and Gregory Scarpa Jr. can be found in the book, Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, and the Mafia, available in print and e-book formats from amazon.com (and in Kimble) and other sources. The decades of preventable airline disasters and their enablers are described and documented in the book, Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries. More information on the enablers to those catastrophic events: 9/11 index. Information provided by a mole inside the al Qaeda cell headed by infamous Ramzi Yousef on the planned terrorist attack, information that was then "deep-sixth" by high-level FBI-DOJ personnel. Absence of preventative measures resulted in nearly 4,000 deaths. Comparative blame for 9/11 between Afghanistan, Iraq, and the documented conduct of enablers in the United States. 9/11 enablers. American Airlines Flight 587 (Strong indications of Terrorist Action) Forewarned Bombings of U.S. Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania The "IF" Factor and 3,000 Deaths Since so few American read books on these matters, they could not possibly understand the "butterfly" or ripple effects from the documented corruption that is also off their radar screen. If they were not so horribly illiterate about the serious conduct of the people in control of the government, they would recognize the "If" factor. Three thousand people would not be dead on 9/11; the United States would not have become ensnared in two deadly wars through blatant lies that a non-illiterate public would have recognized that has already resulted in over a million deaths, injuries, and life-long crippling, and much more. None of this would have happened: If the documented corruption of people in the government's aviation safety offices had for decades enabled to occur a long line of easily preventable airline disasters. If federal judges did not repeatedly, criminally, block a former federal agent and his coalition from reporting these matters, combining their obstruction of justice with multiple criminal retaliation actions. If a hoard of lawyers and law firms had not been more interested in protecting the United States instead of profitably engaging in corrupt and criminal acts that they knew were subverting national interests and would continue to have catastrophic consequences. If the corrupt culture of personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice did not exist, whose actions were subversive to the United States, and constituted a greater harm, and greater source of actual harm, to the American people than any external terrorist. In addition, to cover-up for murders perpetrated by a key FBI supervisor in the New York City offices, FBI-DOJ personnel withheld the most important information that the United States had ever received from a key al Qaeda operative, which enabled to occur nearly 4,000 deaths in the subsequent terrorist attacks. Any Conduct Knowingly Blocking Reporting Federal Crimes Is a Felony The crime of obstruction of justice does not rest upon whether the charges of criminal activities being blocked are actually true. Any act, and especially a conspiracy of two of more people, that blocks the report of a federal crime is a criminal act. The 23 years of sham lawsuits that knowingly hindered and tried to totally block the former federal agent from reporting the ongoing criminal activities associated with an ongoing series of great harm upon the American people and the nation meets the definition of a conspiracy and a criminal racketeering enterprise. Click here for a list of books on endemic corruption in the United States responsible for decades of American tragedies. More information about these books by clicking here. Sampling of prior books reviews. Sampling of reader comments. The "IF" Factor and 3,000 Deaths Since so few American read books on these matters, they could not possibly understand the "butterfly" or ripple effects from the documented corruption that is also off their radar screen. If they were not so horribly illiterate about the serious conduct of the people in control of the government, they would recognize the "If" factor. Three thousand people would not be dead on 9/11; the United States would not have become ensnared in two deadly wars through blatant lies that a non-illiterate public would have recognized that has already resulted in over a million deaths, injuries, and life-long crippling, and much more. None of this would have happened: If the documented corruption of people in the government's aviation safety offices had for decades enabled to occur a long line of easily preventable airline disasters. If federal judges did not repeatedly, criminally, block a former federal agent and his coalition from reporting these matters, combining their obstruction of justice with multiple criminal retaliation actions. If a hoard of lawyers and law firms had not been more interested in protecting the United States instead of profitably engaging in corrupt and criminal acts that they knew were subverting national interests and would continue to have catastrophic consequences. If the corrupt culture of personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice did not exist, whose actions were subversive to the United States, and constituted a greater harm, and greater source of actual harm, to the American people than any external terrorist. In addition, to cover-up for murders perpetrated by a key FBI supervisor in the New York City offices, FBI-DOJ personnel withheld the most important information that the United States had ever received from a key al Qaeda operative, which enabled to occur nearly 4,000 deaths in the subsequent terrorist attacks. Members of Congress, who for decades were informed by Stich, and a host of other insiders, about the corruption and related crashes and corruption in other areas. Their cover-ups of federal crimes constituted felonies under the obstruction of justice statutes, far greater than the offense of cover-up that sent hundreds of people to federal prison. Media people, who for years covered up for high-level corruption when it reaches a certain level of enormity, and their cover-ups of lying by powerful politicians. And if the victims of the crimes−the American public−had exercised the efforts responsible for a properly functioning type of government as exists in the United States, which involved mental efforts to become informed, and then efforts to protest. Comparison of Culpability: Afghanistan, Iraq, and U.S. Enablers On the basis of blame for enabling the four groups of terrorists to so easily hijack four airlines on September 11, 2001, U.S. politicians started a war with Afghanistan, which is now in the eighth year, and a war with Iraq. The reason for carpet bombing and killing thousands of Afghanis was that the al Qaeda group was located in remote mountainous areas. One of the obviously false reason for starting the war with Iraq was that the country harbored al Qaeda terrorists. Check the unpublicized role of a mole in a key al Qaeda cell that provided advance warnings of each of several terrorist attacks upon major U.S. targets−including the 9/11 hijackings. This information has been kept from the public by members of Congress, the media, and of course, employees of the U. S. Department of Justice. Link that explains the comparison of documented guilt between Afghanistan, Iraq, and U.S. enablers. High Government Source Orchestrated The Multiple Schemes And Protected the Participants An understanding of the continuing pattern of blatant and repeated violations of the civil and constitutional substantive and procedural due process rights of the former federal agent, and the continued blatant obstruction of justice actions, had to have the protection of a source high in government. Especially since none of the participants in the documented criminal activities ever faced, nor feared, the consequences of their obstruction of justice and other crimes. That source would be high in the U.S. Department of Justice, the arm of government that has inflicted more harm upon individual Americans than any external terrorist group. Sample of links to conduct of employees of the U.S. Department of Justice: Years of murders of American citizens by FBI agents in the New York City and Boston offices, committed in secret relationship with organized crime and Mafia figures (one of which was known as The Killing Machine), and covered up by FBI-DOJ personnel for years. Details in the book, Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, and the Mafia. The withholding of information on several planned terrorist attacks on major U.S. targets so as to prevent the exposure of the murders. This self-serving act enabled the terrorist attacks to occur, killing nearly 4,000 people. Comparison of blame for 9/11, with FBI-DOJ personnel being high on the list of enablers. Any Conduct Knowingly Blocking Reporting Federal Crimes Is a Felony The crime of obstruction of justice does not rest upon whether the charges of criminal activities being blocked are actually true. Any act, and especially a conspiracy of two of more people, that blocks the report of a federal crime is a criminal act. The 23 years of sham lawsuits that knowingly hindered and tried to totally block the former federal agent from reporting the ongoing criminal activities associated with an ongoing series of great harm upon the American people and the nation meets the definition of a conspiracy, criminal racketeering enterprise, and misprision of felony crimes. Download DVD videos from amazon to rent or to buy, onto your Windows XP operation system computer. For more information, click here. To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link: Hot cell phone and service deal from amazon.com, with 30-day return if not satisfied. Help fund and continue our exposure efforts by ordering any product from amazon.com through our links. Thank you. Consider making your purchases of any item sold by or through amazon.com by going through the following links. This adds nothing to the cost, and helps fund out continuing efforts to expose corruption in the three branches of government. Return to: www.defraudingamerica.com www.unfriendlyskies.com www.druggingamerica.com www.defraudingamericablog.com www.transoceanairlines.com Return to: www.defraudingamerica.com www.unfriendlyskies.com www.druggingamerica.com www.defraudingamericablog.com www.transoceanairlines.com </body>