Years of Legal and Judicial Actions Related
To Corruption and Great American Tragedies
Former federal agent Rodney Stich, after first discovering corruption in certain of the government's aviation safety offices responsible for a series of airline disasters, and after learning of corruption in other areas from the many other former and present government agents who contacted him, sought to circumvent the standard cover-up in government by filing federal lawsuits to make a record and hopefully force attention to the corruption activities.
The first in a series of federal lawsuits, filed between 1974 and 1977, sought to report deep-seat corruption in the government's aviation safety offices that was closely linked to a series of aviation disasters. Various filings in those lawsuits for those with a more serious interest in the facts that continue to inflict such tragic consequences.
These were filed under the authority of the federal crime reporting statute and the statute permitting any citizen to seek a court order requiring a federal official to perform a legal duty and halt unlawful conduct. Although federal district and appellate judges admitted the gravity of the charges, they refused to allow the information to be provided and dismissed the lawsuits.
Last Attempt to Report Corruption
That Enabled the 9/11 Events
attacks on September 11, 2001, was a
federal lawsuit filed in the U.S.
district court, Reno, Nevada. That lawsuit
sought to report criminal activities that were inflicting great harm in numerous
areas of national security and national interest, including the misconduct that
caused the conditions to exist that encouraged and enabled four groups of
hijackers to seize four airliners on 9/11.
Post 9/11 Federal Lawsuits
Seeking Again
To Report Corruption Related to 9/11
conditions that enabled hijackers to seize four
airliners on that fateful day. That lawsuit was submitted for filing to the
U.S. district court at
New York City on August 18, 2002. Although federal law requires
filing of lawsuits upon receipt if the filing fee is paid, it was blocked from being filed for over 12 months.
Continued Judicial Obstruction of Justice
Continued the Years of Status Quo
And Great National Disasters
Most of the 9/11 lawsuits seeking to determine the legal blame for the
events of 9/11 have been
filed in the U.S. district court for the Southern
District of New York. This is the court where two of the top judges have
blocked reports of the corrupt activities that enabled four groups of
hijackers to seize four airliners. By blocking these reports these same federal judges:
Similar Obstruction of
Justice
In the Washington Courts
An earlier post-9/11 federal lawsuit was filed in the U.S. district court at Washington, D.C., seeking to report federal crimes under the federal crime reporting statute, some of which played key roles in the events of 9/11. The lawsuit also exercised federal remedies seeking relief from the massive violations of law that were part of the scheme to halt Stich's reporting of criminal activities.
In violation of law, including the crime reporting statute, Judge Henry Kennedy dismissed the lawsuit immediately after filing, preventing the reporting of the criminal activities and continuing the dual judicial practices of blocking the reports and blocking federal remedies for the massive violations of federally protected rights.
Mechanics of Why 9/11 Occurred
Examining documented facts in reverse, starting from the
events of 9/11, reveals a level or
arrogance, duplicity, and criminal acts that
have been implicated in decades of continuing harm upon national security
issues and the lives of the people harmed by the misconduct−and the coverups:
The terrorists seizure of four airliners on 9/11 was
made possible by absence of known procedures that would prevent the hijackings
of airliners. That is an obvious fact.
Evidence in government records reveal that
there was a culture and corruption
in key segments of the primary government aviation safety offices, the FAA.
And that this corruption repeatedly blocked the implementation of known safety
procedures, and that years of preventable airline disasters resulted from this
misconduct. (Detailed in Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries.)
These would be criminal acts related to many deaths.
The reports of this corruption and
continuing series of
fatal airline disasters were made in letters covering many years sent by
present and former government insiders to members of
Congress, to
Department of
Justice officials, and to media people. None took any action, becoming complicit in the continuing
corruption and tragedies.
Evidence in numerous judicial records
seeking to report the corruption and criminal activities related to corruption
affecting airline safety, and criminal activities adversely
affecting other national
interests.
Corruption in the
government's aviation safety
offices that created the conditions enabling hijackers to seize four
airliners. This corruption blocked the simple and inexpensive preventative measures that
federal inspectors had been reporting for years, that would have halted the
decades of airliner hijackings, for which the authority and
responsibility to perform. Blaming "intelligence failures" for not
discovering
the plans by a close-knit group of hijackers appears to be a deliberate
attempt to divert attention from the primary blame.
Coverups by members of Congress. Members of Congress had been repeatedly notified of the corruption by government insiders, including former federal agent Rodney Stich. A lawsuit was filed against members of Congress in the federal courts at Washington, D.C., and another one in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada. These lawsuits sought to make a record of the charges of cover-ups, and the defendants' responses. They admitted knowing of the charges of criminal misconduct and related consequences and of doing nothing in response, claiming they were immune from the consequences.
From seemingly remote acts by people in the government's aviation safety offices, misconduct in the offices responsible for intelligence, coverups, and retaliation against whistleblowers, the "butterfly effect" made possible catastrophic consequences for years, including on September 11, 2001. An outsider could not be expected to understand how corrupt people in the government's aviation safety offices, blocking the known preventative measures to block hijackers, could result in 3,000 deaths and the peripheral consequences from those hijackings.
Nor could an outsider recognize the catastrophic consequences made possible by federal judges blocking the reporting of corrupt actions by key people in government offices. Or the outcome from misusing judicial power to harm the one former government agent who continued his efforts t report and halt the corrupt activities.
Another name for the "butterfly effect" is the well-known "blowback effect," a term that should be household words in the United States where the blowback effect of corrupt and covert activities by America's politicians and CIA operations has been repeatedly catastrophic−but not recognized.
Also playing key roles in the misconduct, the coverups,
the retaliation, and the consequences,
were Justices of
the U.S. Supreme Court. They had supervisory responsibilities over the
judges blocking reports of criminal activities, the judges inflicting harm
upon Stich to halt his exposure activities, and the judges who converted Stich
to a literal man without a country by terminating his civil and constitutional
protections.
Further, Supreme Court Justices also refused to receive reports of the criminal activities that they had a responsibility to receive under the federal crime reporting statute. They violated many federal statutes by their misconduct. If they had exercised their moral and legal responsibilities, it is probable that the events of 9/11 would never have happened. The evidence against the Justices includes:
Criminal Statutes Repeatedly
Violated by
Federal Judges
The criminal activities that federal judges repeatedly blocked from being reported were being reported to a federal court under the federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4). That statute requires a federal judge to receive the information and any evidence as part of his administrative duties. Blocking the reports would be criminal acts combined with violations of other criminal statutes, including:
Title 18 U.S.C. § 3. Accessory after the fact. Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 153. Embezzlement by trustee or officer. Whoever knowingly and fraudulently appropriates to his own use, embezzles, spends, or transfers any property or secretes or destroys any document belonging to the estate of a debtor which came into his charge as trustee ... shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... or both.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 241. Conspiracy against rights of citizens. If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his so exercised the same, ... they shall be fined ... or imprisoned ...
Title 18 U.S.C § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law. Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person ... to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishment, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; (check if this has been applied against a group, such as whistleblowers).
Title 18 U.S.C § 246. Deprivation of relief benefits. Whoever directly or indirectly deprives, attempts to deprive, or threatens to deprive any person of any employment, position, work, compensation, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress appropriating funds for work relief or relief purposes, on account of political affiliation, race, color, sex, religion, or national origin, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States. If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof, in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined ... or imprisoned ...
Title 18 U.S.C. § 372. Conspiracy to impede or injure officer. If two or more persons in any State, Territory, Possession, or District conspire to prevent, by force, intimidation, or threat, any person from accepting or holding any office, trust, or place of confidence under the United States, or from discharging any duties thereof, or to induce by like means any officer of the United States top leave the place, where his duties as an officer are required to be performed, or to injure him in his person or property on account of his lawful discharge of the duties of his office, or while engaged in the lawful discharge thereof, or to injure his property so as to molest, interrupt, hinder, or impede him in the discharge of his official duties, each of such persons shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than six years, or both.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Frauds and swindles. Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, ..... places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or deposits or causes to be deposited ...., shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Fraud by wire, radio, or television. Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant--(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, or threatens another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to −(1) influence, delay or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding: shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... or both.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant. (a) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for−(1) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense.
Title 18 U.S.C. § 1515. Definitions for certain provisions; general provision. (a) As used in sections 1512 and 1513 of this title and in this section-(1) the term "official proceeding" means-(A) A proceeding before a judge or court of the United States. (2) the term "physical force" means physical action against another, and includes confinement; (3) the term "misleading conduct" means-
(A) knowingly making a false statement;
(B) intentionally omitting information from a statement and thereby causing a portion of such statement to be misleading, or intentionally concealing a material fact, and thereby creating a false impression by such statement;
(C) with intent to mislead, knowingly submitting or inviting reliance on a writing or recording that is false, forged, altered, or otherwise lacking in authenticity;
(D) with intent to mislead, knowingly submitting or inviting reliance on a sample, specimen, map, photograph, boundary mark, or other object that is misleading in a material respect; or
(E) knowingly using a trick, scheme, or device with intent to mislead.
Racketeering enterprise and RICO statutes violated.
Other legal definitions pertain to the conduct of federal judges.
Other links to federal laws violated by federal judges, and civil and constitutional, all perpetrated knowing that they were involved in schemes to block the reports of criminal and subversive activities.
List of California judges directly implicated.
Multiple Reasons for The
Judicial
Obstruction of Justice
Many reasons exist for the series of judicial crimes. But after federal judges blocked the initial attempts to expose the corruption related to a continuing series of fraud-related airline crashes they had to continue their coverup actions to keep their prior misconduct from being exposed.
Then, when Stich started publicizing the judicial misconduct in his books and on radio and television shows, it is very probable that the sham lawsuit filed by the CIA-front law firm was to financially destroy Stich and thereby halt his expensive exposure activities.
Once that sham lawsuit started, it became necessary for federal judges to compound their obstruction of justice with repeated violations of state and federal laws that Stich relied upon to defend against the multiple sham lawsuits.
Although the judicial cover-ups and obstruction of justice enabled the continuation of great harm associated with the underlying corruption, the catastrophic events of September 11, 2001, made possible by the corruption the judges were protecting, created an even greater threat−and the importance of further blocking Stich's exposure activities.
Also, many other people besides federal judges were implicated in the coverups, including members of Congress, Justice Department personnel, much of the media, and those perpetrating by underlying criminal activities (such as drug smuggling, bankruptcy court corruption, illegal funding of Iraq's arms buildup, and much more). The continuing misconduct by federal judges, including those in the district and appellate courts of New York and Washington, D.C., protected all of these implicated people.
Lawsuit
Naming Supreme Court Justices
As Defendants, Based On Complicity
The basis and purposes of the lawsuit were to:
Continuation Into 21st Century of
Obstruction of Justice Tactics
With more evidence then ever of the massive involvement of lawyers and judges in the felony obstruction of justice tactics, and with books available exposing their crimes, its became even more important that lawyers and judges continue their efforts to silence former federal agent Rodney Stich. Since they had already stripped him of all worldly possessions, they then went after the books that he wrote.
The latest attempt to halt information of the corruption reaching the public involved attempts to seize the books. The first series of lawyers, law firms, and judges started with a sham legal action in South Carolina that used a possible wife-murderer as straw man, a combination that would fit in well with the history of lawyers, law firms, and judges and the related series of catastrophic events.
That scheme was then joined by a Los Angeles law firm and lawyers that then had the cooperation of California judges who were already deeply involved in conduct that enabled to occur great tragedies.
Despite the fact, which they surely knew, that prior efforts of lawyers and judges to interfere with the efforts to expose the deadly corruption, the Gratzer and Guerrini lawyers cavalierly proceeded to continue the practices that they knew would enable the corrupt and criminal activities to continue, along with the multiple forms of catastrophic consequences.
And if the facts are corrupt, they would be guilty of various criminal activities, including obstruction of justice and retaliating against a witness and former federal agent in an attempt to prevent reporting of crimes against the United States.
Powerful Force Orchestrating Multiple
Schemes That Protected the Perpetrators
If these legal attacks upon Stich had to be funded by some unknown source, the cost would have been in the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Just in the latest scheme started by the Smith and Collins lawyers, involving half a dozen law firms and dozens of lawyers, the cost would easily exceed $100,000. Whose paying for this vast legal obstruction of justice tactics?
Since 1982, against Stich, had involved over 100 lawyers, law firms, California and federal judges. Apparently the urgency of silencing Stich supported the Herculean efforts. The evidence, including the repeated violations of large numbers of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, thee total denial of all procedural defenses, and the involvement of state and federal personnel, strongly indicated that a powerful force somewhere in government had been orchestrating these events from the beginning, using the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross in San Francisco and their lawyers.
The most probable location of this power, strange as it may seem, and based upon the control over state and federal judges and lawyers nationwide, is the federal judiciary. Whatever the source, it would add still another area of corruption subverting the United States from within.
How the
Hoard of Perpetrators
Get Away With
Their Crimes
The hoard of perpetrators continue to get away with their corrupt conduct for several reasons: :
Complicity by Hoard of Lawyers and Law Firms
Starting in 1982 and continuing without interruption to 2005, over 50 lawyers and law firms were directly involved in a series of sham legal actions that knowingly hindered former federal agent Rodney Stich from reporting, publicizing, and trying to halt the continuing corruption responsible for numerous harm upon the American people and the United States−including the 9/11 terrorist attacks that they helped to make possible.
Description of attacks by the hoard of lawyers and law firms.
Description of the combined attacks by lawyers and judges, acting in parallel to prevent the public from learning about the high-level criminal activities and resulting harm to the nation.
IF the culture and corruption within the FAA did in fact exist (as overwhelming documentation shows), which included a history of blocking the implementation of procedures addressing the known safety problems, such as hijackings);
It would explain why the known and obviously long overdue measures to prevent the hijackings of the four airliners on 9/11 were not taken;
And the preventative measures to prevent airline hijackings did exist (and Stich made such recommendations);
And the need for such preventative measures was obvious from years of airline hijackings, plus the knowledge that airline hijackings were planned by Middle East terrorists);
And if lawyers did engage in legal actions knowing that they were blocking his reports, and most probably, intended to block the reports;
It becomes obvious that the long overdue preventatives measures were blocked by the legal tactics which constituted criminal obstruction of justice;
It then becomes obvious that if a citizen had perpetrated a minute fraction of these offenses that he would be criminally prosecuted for complicity in events that led to the 9/11 hijackings and 3,000 deaths. And these were only one-day's consequences, and only in the aviation area.
If these lawyers are guilty of any complicity in these events, we also have the complicity of the dozens of members of Congress who knew not only about the underlying criminal activities, but also the criminal obstruction of justice and criminal retaliation against the former federal agent. And the others, in the media and elsewhere, who also knew! Talk about the ugly Americans, what about the criminal Americans!
The next question: What are you going to do about this blatant criminal and even subversive conduct by dozens of lawyers?
Brutal Consequences Made Possible
By Legal and Judicial Enablers
In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences.
More information about these books by clicking here.
Email address for the author and activist against corruption in
government: stich@unfriendlyskies.com.
For more information relating to the author and his activities put
"Rodney Stich" into a search engine
such as Google or yahoo.com.
The links run into many tens of thousands.
To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link:
Cellphone and service deal from amazon.com, with 30-day return if not satisfied.
Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts.
Return to:
