Among the arguments raised by Supreme Court Justices seeking Dismissal

It was obvious that no federal judge would allow a lawsuit against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court to proceed. However, Stich wanted to make a judicial record of his allegations of criminal activities in government offices, the tragedies associated with the corruption, the complicity of federal judges and Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, and the response by the Justices

No benefit will be gained from further briefing and argument of the issues presented. [That includes the corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, the cover-ups by federal judges, the retaliation by federal judges for seeking to report the corruption, and the cover-ups by the Justices of the Supreme Court.]

Appellant filed a rambling complaint against the [Justices; the typical tact used by lawyers against non-lawyer filings are to call the complaints rambling, and avoid the issues].

Fanciful conspiracy [in referring to the judicial cover-ups];

Appellant's complaint constitutes an ad nauseam recapitulation of threadbare and illusory claims [referring to the corruption that Stich and his group of other former government agents discovered during their professional and official duties].

Appellant conspicuously displays the truly eccentric character of his unbelievable allegations.

The defense of statute of limitations and laches may be applicable to this action.

Appellant's unsupported and vituperative allegations into a comprehensible statement.