Federal Lawsuit Filed in Reno, Nevada
Over the years Stich filed lawsuits in the federal courts raising federal causes of actions for which federal judges, by law, had to provide a court forum, something they refused every time. The lawsuits had the following issues:
- Attempts to report to a federal judge the
criminal activities
related to a series of
airline disasters
that Stich initially discovered during his official duties as a federal
aviation safety inspector-investigator, and then as other government
agents contacted him, he sought to report the
criminal activities
in other areas.
- After Stich was targeted by lawyers, including
CIA-front law firms, seeking to silence him through various
tactics,
including stripping Stich of the assets that funded his exposure
activities, Stich included additional federal causes of actions. these
additional defenses arose under the
Civil Rights Act for the
massive violations occurring in state courts,
Bivens for the civil rights
violations occurring in the federal courts,
Declaratory
Judgment Act, the void
judgment doctrine, and civil RICO.
All of these violations related to these federal causes of actions arose
in the continuing schemes to obstruct justice by trying to silence Stich.
- The last lawsuit before the 9/11 hijackings, seeking to report, among other matters, the corruption resulting in a continuation series of airline disasters, was filed in the federal courts at Reno, Nevada. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) That lawsuit named as defendants California judges and lawyers whose obstruction of justice tactics included the many violations of federally protected rights.
The issues other than reporting the criminal activities included the following:
- Demand for an order halting the record-setting numbers of civil and constitutional
violations against former federal agent and activist, Rodney Stich that were
part of the bizarre scheme to block his reporting of corruption in key
government offices, including the FAA and NTSB. The
authority for this relief is the Civil Rights Act (42 U.S.C. §§
1983-1988),
Title
28 U.S.C. § 1343, the
Declaratory
Judgment Act, and the constitutional rights embodied in the Bivens
doctrine. This right was denied in 2001.
- Declaratory judgment to declare Stich's personal and property rights
established in multiple judgments that were taken by California and federal
judges in clear violation of state and federal laws. The scheme to strip
Stich of the assets that funded his exposure activities consisted of a
lawsuit barred by federal and state law for which federal defenses exist
under the
Declaratory
Judgment Act and
Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 57, and the Civil Rights Act.
- Declaratory judgment to declare as void the orders by federal judges
taking Stich's $10 million in assets that funded his exposure of
corruption in judicial and government offices. These orders taking Stich's
life assets violated the legal and constitutional requirement of a noticed
hearing, a hearing, and reason for seizing. Supreme Court decisions hold
that such orders are void and are forever void. Stich was entitled to a
declaratory judgment addressing these orders taking Stich's home, his
businesses, his real estate his assets, his sole source of income,
everything. This right was denied.
- Damages for the civil and constitutional violations occurring in the federal courts by federal judges and lawyers who acted in unison with the judges. This right is provided by constitutional provisions as articulated in the Bivens doctrine. This right was denied.
Sampling of Corrupt Activities Being Reported
Among the areas of corrupt activities were those that
created the conditions that shortly thereafter enabled four
groups of
terrorists to hijack four airliners on 9/11.
The areas of corruption included the primary government aviation safety agency, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), where the responsibility existed for preventing airliners from being hijacked; and the FBI and CIA, which had the responsibility for finding the scheme and taking action to thwart the scheme of the hijackers.
The lawsuit was blocked by the district court judge at Reno dismissing every defendant and every non-defendant cause of action (Declaratory Judgment Act and Supreme Court's void judgment doctrine), violating law barring dismissal when facts stated in the Complaint state a federal cause of action for which relief is available.
In addition, the judge protected every defendant against answering discovery (which would have further exposed the conspiracy to block the reporting of criminal activities in government); denied the right to a jury trial on the factual matters; refused to make findings of facts and conclusions of law when dismissal is made on the basis of facts.
While the lawsuit was pending, and after the 9/11 terrorist hijackings, Stich filed a declaration into that lawsuit showing the relationship of the corruption Stich sought to report; and how the actions of the CIA-front law firm and the California judges had become complicit in the 9/11 events by seeking to halt Stich's reporting and exposure activities. January 21, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
Continuing the pattern of judicial cover-ups, U.S. District Judge Reed blocked the lawsuit from proceeding, and dismissed it, in clear violation of numerous federal due process requirements.
Stich then filed a notice of appeal and an appeal brief with the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals at San Francisco. January 27, 2002(MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
Appellate Judges Continuing Their Prior Complicity
The Ninth Court court of appeal blocked the due process right to appeal to proceed, stating in an April 12, 2002, order that Stich had been permanently blocked by a 1994 injunction from filing any appeal briefs. These are rights guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States and available to terrorists and murderers, but not to Stich!
In response to the violation of due process--combined with judicial efforts blocking the reporting of criminal and subversive activities--Stich submitted a petition for extraordinary writ to Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas on May 1, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF); along with a cover letter. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
By this time the gravity of the obstruction of justice and the massive numbers of violations of state and federal laws that were part of the legal obstruction of justice schemes were so serious that every court of appeals judge supported the criminal and civil rights violations. The judges in the Ninth Circuit court of appeals, who had repeatedly in the past blocked the reporting of the criminal activities, starting in 1974, refused to recognize the appeal briefs filed by Stich.
Request for admissions sent to defendant lawyers, California judges, and federal judges.
Free books: Segments of each of the 14 books revealing the continuing history of corruption and cover-ups, and related tragedies, are available by clicking here.
Free books. For a listing of the books written by former government insiders on the continuing history of corrupt activities responsible for a continuing series of human tragedies, and to download at no charge segments of each of the books, click here.
These books are now the latest attempt by a coterie of lawyers and judges seeking to remove from public availability the books that expose their own complicity in the many areas of corrupt activities.
Email address for the author and activist against corruption in
government: stich@unfriendlyskies.com.
For more information relating to the author and his activities put
"Rodney Stich" into a search engine
such as Google or yahoo.com.
The links run into many tens of thousands.
Download DVD videos from amazon to rent or to buy, onto your Windows XP operation system computer. For more information, click here.
To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link:
Hot cell phone and service deal from amazon.com, with 30-day return if not satisfied.
Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts.
Return to: