Federal Judges Blocked Lawsuit
Seeking to Report Corruption
That Enabled 9/11 to Occur

Shortly after the hijackings of four airliners on September 11, 2001, former federal agent Rodney Stich again sought to report the conditions, the corruption, and enablers, responsible for the conditions that made it possible for 19 terrorists to so easily hijack four airliners.

• Lawsuit filed by former FAA airline safety inspector Rodney Stich, August 8, 2002, was stamped "received," instead of the required "filed."  (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• That lawsuit:
   
  • Charged, and offered to produce evidence obtained initially as a key government airline safety expert, about the deep-seated and repeatedly covered up corruption in the government's aviation safety offices that enabled to occur a long line of preventable and forewarned airline disasters, of which the 9/11 hijackings were simply one more in ma long line of fraud-related aviation disasters.
     
  • The misconduct by employees in the U.S. Department of Justice, including the cover-up of advance information obtained from a mole inside the most infamous al Qaeda cell.
     
  • The misconduct by Justice Department employees, including the obstruction of justice retaliation against a former key federal aviation safety inspector, seeking to silence him, which included the corrupt seizur5e and liquidation of the assets that funded his attempts to expose the endemic corruption.
     
  • The federal judges who repeatedly blocked the former federal agent fro5m reporting the corruption, combing that repeated obstruction of justice with retaliatory felonies.
     
  • The lawyers who engaged in a 19 year continuous pattern of sham lawsuits against the former government agent in schemes parallel to the obstruction of justice by federal judges, acting in a conspiracy and as a racketeering enterprise with the goal of covering up for high-level corruption.
     
• Chief judge Michael Mukasey blocked the attempt to report the lawsuit. Probable reason for blocking the filing: the lawsuit reported:
   
  • The years of aviation disasters made possible by the corruption of people in the government's aviation safety offices.
     
  • The years of cover-ups by people in control of government offices that had a responsibility to receive evidence of the corruption.
     
  • The years of repeated cover-ups by federal judges, whose obstruction of justice actions made possible the string of catastrophic aviation disasters.
     
  • The felony retaliation against the former government aviation safety expert in an effort to prevent the corruption from being known.
     
  • The conspiracy and racketeering enterprise focused on blocking this information from being known that involved dozens of federal judges and dozens of lawyers.
     
• In an attempt to force Mukasey to file the lawsuit, former federal agent Rodney Stich sent letters sent to Chief Justice William Rehnquist and each of the other Supreme Court Justices, advising them of the latest judicial obstruction of justice tactic that was occurring in areas for which they had supervisory responsibilities. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• After sending that letter, Mukasey then filed the lawsuit on September 22, 2004, that by law he should have allowed to be filed 13 months earlier.
   
• Within hours of filing that lawsuit, an order by judge Michael B. Mukasey dismissed it. That dismissal:
   
  • Constituted an obstruction of justice felony under the obstruction of justice statutes. Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 requires that anyone who knows of a federal crime must−to avoid being guilty of an obstruction of justice crime−report the knowledge to any federal judge, or other federal official. A federal judge is then required to receive that information as part of the judge's mandatory administrative duties. To block such report is a felony.
     
  • Violated basic due process rights guaranteed under the laws and constitution of the United States. As it related to due process rights, the dismissal violated:
     
    • The requirement for a federal judge to allow a lawsuit that states one or more federal causes of actions to be heard, as part of the judge's duties and for the judge was being paid.
       
    • The right to a notice of hearing, and a hearing, to object to any planned dismissal.
       
    • And upon presentation of information and evidence that a federal cause of action was stated, the dismissal was barred.
       
• Stich filed a notice of appeal on October 14, 2003, of that dismissal, as provided by law. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• Stich then filed a timely opening brief to the Court of Appeals, January 3, 2004. That brief provided information to the three-judge appellate panel of the serious corruption  (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• Stich appeared before the court of appeals and presented oral argument in support of the brief. By that time, the situation had become so dire, with the documented criminal complicity of dozens of federal judges, whose misconduct played key7 roles in the conditions that enabled terrorists to hijack four airliners and kill nearly 3,000 people within a matter of hours. As with every other court of appeals, the three judges, Jose A. Cabranes, Chester J. Straub, and Richard C. Wesley. signed an order (August 25, 2004) dismissing the appeal. (Adobe PDF)  That order continued in effect the long existing corruption, insuring that the events of 9/11 would be followed by more disasters made possible by the cover-ups.
   
• Stich then filed a petition for all the judges, en banc, to consider the appeal. That put every other federal judge in that circuit on notice of the criminal activities, the criminal cover-ups, that played a key roles in the conditions leading to the 9/11 hijackings and 3,000 deaths. They joined the conspiracy of judicial cover-ups.
   
• To make additional record that the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court knew of the underlying criminal activities and the obstruction of justice tactics by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities, Stich sent letters to Chief Justice William Rehnquist with copies to the other justices. January 30, 2004. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• Declaration of filing irregularities, filed by Stich, on February 23, 2004. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• Appeal reply brief to Court of Appeals, February 29, 2004 (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• Reply brief by Stich objecting to motion by Justice Department lawyers to dismiss the attempt to report the criminal activities related to the 9/11 hijackings. June 3, 2004, and filed June 8, 2004. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
• Notice, June 30, 2004, setting date for oral argument before the Court of Appeals in New York City on August 24, 2004. (Adobe PDF)
   
• Petition for rehearing en banc, that put every appellate judge in the entire district Second Circuit on notice of the underlying criminal activities and the pattern of felony obstruction of justice and felony civil rights violations perpetrated to accomplish the obstruction of justice, September 7, 2004, and filed on September 13, 2004. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• Petition sent to U.S. Supreme Court, January 5, 2005, making each of the Justices aware of these serious matters. No response. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
   
• Stich sent a copy of filings to U.S. Solicitor General, as required by rules of court. January 5, 2005. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) the wife of former Solicitor General. Ironically, or tragically, Solicitor General from June 2001 to July 2004 was Theodore B. Olson−whose wife was on one of the planes being hijacked in which the occupants were brutally killed. He obviously knew−prior to 9/11−of the many court filings by former federal agent Rodney Stich, about the criminal conditions that would play a major role in his wife's death. If he had responded as morally and legally required, it is highly possibly that his wife−and nearly 3,000 other victims−would not have been killed. Since he played a role in not only his wife's death but of the others, he was, properly, reminded of this in a letter dated April 13, 2004.  (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

Federal Judges Protected the Continuing
Corrupt Activities That Made 9/11 Possible

Among the criminal activities that the legal filings brought to the attention of every federal judge in the Second Circuit, including New York, were the following:

• Culture of corruption by key people in the government's aviation safety offices which Stich discovered after being given the assignment to correct the conditions responsible for the worst series of airline disasters in the nation's history.

• Sampling of the aviation disasters and deaths resulting from the corruption.

• Corruption, people, and groups, whose misconduct created or continued the conditions that made it easy for 19 terrorists to hijack four airliners on September 11, 2001, and kill nearly 3,000 people.

• Corrupt conduct by federal judges whose obstruction-of-justice tactics parallel the similar conduct of the Friedman lawyers.

• Involvement of lawyers with the U.S. Department of Justice, involved in murders and with multiple roles in misconduct responsible for the hijackings of four airliners on September 11, 2001.

They then became, as judges before them, enablers of great and catastrophic events inflicted upon the American people and upon the United States.

Years of Complicity by Supreme Court Justices

From the 1970s to 2005, Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court knew of these matters, and covered up for them, despite the moral and legal responsibilities under the crime reporting statutes, and they responsibilities to supervise the federal judges of the United States.

One of many letters and petitions received by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court was the letter to Supreme Court Justice Rehnquist, dated January 2, 2001, reporting corruption that several months later enabled to occur the worst terrorist attacks in the nation's history. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)

• List with sampling of other letters and petitions to the Justices of the U.S. Supreme court advising them of specific areas of corruption that were subverting national security.