Description of Explosive Lawsuits in Federal Courts
Criminal Aspects
Federal judges repeatedly blocked the reporting of criminal activities discovered by former federal agent Rodney Stich and a group of other former federal agents. The federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, requires that anyone who knows of a possible federal crime must promptly report it to a federal judge or other federal officer. This statute requires that federal judges exercise their non-discretionary administrative duties to receive reports of criminal acts and any evidence offered. Thousands of men and women have been sentenced to federal prison for failure to make such reports, including failure to report what they overheard in a one-sided telephone conversation relating to drugs. These documented judicial obstruction of justice acts were federal felonies. The corrupt and criminal activities that former FAA inspector sought to report to a federal court under the requirements of the federal crime reporting statute (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4), which were repeatedly blocked by federal judges and Justice Department lawyers, included the corruption that insured the success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackers, prior fatal hijackings, prior terrorist bombings, and those terrorist acts yet to occur.
Evidence of attempts to report criminal activities to a federal judge are documented in a series of federal actions when Stich sought to report corrupt and criminal activities related to a series of fatal airline crashes. The refusal to receive this information made possible the continuation of documented air safety and criminal misconduct and the culture breeding these federal offenses, with the expected results of other crashes due to the same problems. This relationship is described in the third edition of Unfriendly Skies.
As Stich continued his investigative and activities activities, other former federal agents provided him with insider information and documentation on other areas and other forms of criminal activities. These sources included former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial operations, former drug traffickers, and former agents of the FBI, DEA, Customs, Secret Service. These activities are described in the various books written by former federal agent Rodney Stich.
The criminal activities against the United States revealed by this information and documentation included:
Culture of corruption within the FAA and NTSB that prevented the federal government from meeting its air safety responsibilities. The success of the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackers is only one of a long series of related tragedies resulting from the misconduct and the duplicity of cover-ups by virtually every government check and balance and much of the broadcast and print media.
Decades of drug smuggling into the United States by people acting under cover of government offices and covert government operations.
Widespread looting of people's assets after exercising the statutory protection of Chapter 11, which involved large numbers of corrupt federal judges, judge appointed trustees, Justice Department trustees, lawyers, law firms, CIA personnel, and opportunists working with them to carry out their criminal activities.
CIA involvement in looting the savings and loans, HUD programs, and other financial frauds, as revealed by CIA assets that were part of these activities.
CIA funding of secret bank accounts for some prominent U.S. politicians, as revealed by the former heads of several secret CIA financial operations. These names are listed in the third edition of Defrauding America, and include people in both Bush presidencies. (The corruption is in both political parties.)
Series of other corrupt operations, including the October Surprise that tampered with the election between President Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan, as told by CIA assets who were part of the operation.
And much more, as described in the books referred to on this website.
In addition to the federal statute requiring federal crimes to be reported to a federal court, another statute (Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361) provides a right to any citizen to federal court access seeking an order to require a federal official to comply with the law and to halt unlawful activities.
Federal judges Compounded These Federal Crimes with Their Own
Federal judges issued injunctive orders barring Stich access to the federal courts for the remainder of his life. These were unlawful and unconstitutional orders. These orders also deprived Stich of the rights and protections guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States that were needed to defend against the next round of corrupt judicial acts. These orders also prevented Stich from reporting criminal activities that were inflicting great harm upon the American public, which included the September 11, 2001, terrorist hijackings, prior fatal hijackings, and other tragedies.
As federal agents provided Stich with additional information and documentation revealing criminal activities in certain judicial and other government offices, Stich repeated his efforts to report them to a federal court. (He could not report them to the lawyers in the U.S. Department of Justice because of their history of prior cover-ups and also because of their involvement in covering-up the criminal activities being reported.) If Stich did not report these criminal activities, he would be guilty of criminal cover-up.)
Federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors then charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for exercising his right and his responsibility to access the federal courts (on the basis that prior judicial orders barred him for the remainder of his life from federal court access).
These retaliatory acts may be the only time in American history that documents exist showing a citizen, a former federal agent, being sent to federal prison for reporting criminal activities in judicial and other government offices.
Federal judges denied Stich a jury trial, Stich's attorney protected the judges and Justice Department lawyers, and Stich was sent to federal prison for six months, of which six weeks were spent in solitary confinement. Stich has recently undergone open heart surgery for six coronary bypasses, he was approaching the age of 70, and it would not be unexpected if the stress ended fatally for him.
Pattern of Civil, Constitutional, and Criminal Violations
With Catastrophic Consequences
After Stich left government employment, due to refusal to work under the corrupt conditions involved with a series of crashes occurring in his area of federal air safety responsibilities, Stich used his considerable assets to publicize the criminal activities that he discovered in the hope that he could arose help from what he expected to be an aroused public. (He once believed in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, so it is understandable he though there were sufficient courageous and civic-minded people that would assist in bringing these corrupt activities to a halt!)
These costly activities included publishing books and promoting them, appearing on hundreds of radio and television shows (over 3,000 at this time), giving speeches, and continuing his investigative work. Without his assets to fund these activities, it could be expected that he would cease to be a danger to those people in the government who were threatened by his actions.
In 1982, a bizarre lawsuit was filed against him by the San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross, that targeted these assets. (At a later time, several reliable sources disclosed that the law firm was a front for the CIA and FBI.)
That lawsuit was barred by several dozen California laws, and barred by federal laws and constitutional provisions. Further, California law specifically deprives California judges of jurisdiction for that cause of action.
Pattern of Civil Rights Violations by California Judges
For the next six years, California judges issued orders, without jurisdiction and in violation of dozens of state and federal laws, that inflicted great personal and financial harm upon Stich. California court of appeal judges repeatedly refused to perform their duties which required them to halt the violations of law and the orders issued without jurisdiction. Appeals to the California Supreme Court were equally futile, except in one case when California Supreme Court Justice Stanley Mosk voted to provided a hearing. Because the other Supreme Court Justices refused to act, the vote by Mosk did not provide any help.
Pattern of Civil Rights Violations by Federal Judges
Federal law and the U.S. Constitution provided numerous federal remedies for any single one of the dozens of violations being perpetrated against Stich in the California courts by California judges and the CIA-front law firm. (Word) (Adobe pdf) These remedies included, for instance:
Civil Rights Act (Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983-1988), to halt civil rights violations.
Title 28 U.S.C. § 1343, to halt civil rights violations.
Declaratory Judgment Act (Title 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201, 2202).
Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
U.S. Supreme Court decisions relating to the multiple violations of civil and constitutional rights.
Federal rules of civil procedures, relating to the right to a federal court access, prohibition against dismissal by federal judges, the right to a jury trial.
Stich filed the first of multiple federal actions in 1983 (and the latest--prior to September 11, 2001--was filed in the U.S. district court at Reno, Nevada, in 1999). In the 1983 lawsuit, Stich simply sought to have the court address the violations occurring in the California courts under the color of state law, which invoked federal jurisdiction on the basis of the violations of federally protected rights, and sought an order under the Declaratory Judgment Act upholding the validity of the prior judgments that had already adjudicated and determined the matters addressed in the California lawsuit.
It can be assumed that whoever was behind the original scheme filed in the California courts did not expect Stich to exercise federal remedies. (Strange, perhaps, to people not sophisticated in the limitations of the average lawyer, very few lawyers knew of these federal remedies, as evidenced by Stich's experience with dozens of lawyers during the past 20 years.) If federal judges provided the relief that they were duty-bound to do, it would immediately halt the scheme to strip Stich of the assets that funded his exposure of judicial and other government corruption, expose the CIA-front law firm, expose the documented pattern of civil rights violations by a large block of California judges, and expose all of them to further lawsuits that could eventually bring about an exposure of the criminal activities that Stich was trying to expose.
Starting with that first exercise of federal defenses in 1983, and continuing to this very date, every federal judge:
Refused to address the repeated and massive violations of state and federal laws and constitutional provisions, thereby aiding and abetting the massive judicial subversion of important rights and protections guaranteed under our form of government through the laws and the Constitution of the United States. Federal judges specifically subverted the rights and protections guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States that protected every citizen against the violations of these rights.
Refused to address the validity of the prior judgments that made the California lawsuit meaningless. In this way, federal judges subverted the protections under the Declaratory Judgment Act. That contradiction still exists today in the courts, wherein Stich's personal and property rights are contradicted between seven judgments that musts be recognized under state and federal laws and the California judgment issued by judges lacking jurisdiction, that violated dozens of state and federal laws, and is void as a matter of law. However, a judge must make that determination to clear the records, and they refuse to do that despite their duty to do so.
In every instance, federal judges protected the CIA-front law firm and California judges whose documented acts violated the same federal protections that the federal judges were sworn to uphold.
Every lawsuit filed by Stich, all of which stated multiple federal causes of actions for which federal relief existed, was unlawfully and promptly dismissed at the pleading stage, often without a hearing. These dismissals violated numerous Supreme Court decisions and federal rules of court in addition to violating due process rights.
In almost every case, federal judges sought to justify their dismissals by placing a frivolous label on the lawsuits. Any single one of the state and federal laws that were repeatedly violated constituted a federal cause of action, and Stich was suffering grave personal and financial harm from the violations. These factors made the frivolous label obviously fraudulent. Further, federal laws were specifically intended for any one of these many violations, although there had probably never been this many violations ever shown in any federal lawsuit. This was one of a kind. Further, the violations stated in Stich's lawsuits were the extreme opposite of the criteria articulated in Supreme Court decisions to meet the definition of a frivolous action.
With each subsequent lawsuit addressing newly perpetrated violations of federally protected rights, the causes of actions included the aiding and abetting by prior federal judges, which greatly increased the federal causes of action available to Stich. Federal judges were now deeply implicated in the wrongdoings, and something had to be done to address this danger to them.
They addressed this added threat by issuing injunctive orders barring Stich for the remainder of his life from federal court access. In this way, the violations the federal judge, the California judges, and the CIA-front law firm and lawyers could continue and escalate without Stich having access to federal defenses.
Eventually, federal judges issued unlawful and unconstitutional orders taking Stich's home, his businesses, his real estate, his assets, and his sole source of income, completing the goal of the sham California lawsuit filed by the CIA-law firm. These orders violated the legal and constitutional requirements of a notice of hearing, a hearing, and legally required cause.
Higher Power Protected the Judicial Corruption
They simply took these assets, apparently feeling that none of the protections in law, or the congressional oversight, or the Justice Department's civil rights division, would interfere. The check and balance having immediate supervisory responsibility over the judges were the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, who were kept informed of these corrupt activities through letters and petitions submitted to the Supreme Court by Stich.
Other checks and balances that had a responsibility to act--and who instead covered-up--were members of Congress and especially the judiciary committees, and then the Department of Justice's Civil Rights Division. Stich repeatedly notified these government checks and balances of the criminal cover-ups, the criminal retaliation for attempting to report the criminal activities, and the conversion of federal courts into a vehicle to destroy the protections of the laws and Constitution of the United States. By their refusal to answer or by their typical off-the-shelf stonewalling, they all aided and abetted the judicial acts that were subverting the rule of law in the United States.
Combining Civil and Constitutional Violations With Suspension of the Rule of Law
After seizing these assets, additional injunctive orders were issued, barring Stich from filing objections to the seizure and subsequent liquidation, a continuation of the judicial due process violations.
Criminal Contempt of Court For Exercising Legal and Constitutional Due Process
When Stich did exercise his legal and constitutional right to object, federal judge Edward Jellen in Oakland, California, charged Stich with criminal contempt of court, denied him his own funds to hire legal counsel, denied him court-appointed legal counsel, and then held him guilty, and sentenced Stich to federal prison. From 1986 through 1995, Stich was continentally charged with criminal contempt of court, was in prison for six months, and the remainder of the time he was released on parole pending trial, and restricted in travel to a small area around his residence.
In 1999, after all of his assets were liquidated and distributed, mostly to the lawyers whose documented pattern of civil rights violations made a mockery of the rule of law, Stich filed a federal lawsuit in the U.S. District Court at Reno, Nevada. That lawsuit combined the 20 years of judicial corruption and named as defendants the California district and appellate judges whose violated his civil rights under color of state law; the federal judges who violated record-setting civil and constitutional rights under color of federal law; and the lawyers who perpetrated both levels of civil and constitutional rights. Stich also continued his demand that the federal court received the reports and evidence of criminal activities in certain judicial and government offices that he and his group of other former federal agents had discovered and for which they had hard evidence.
That lawsuit, and the reactions of that district judge, the reactions of judges in the Ninth Circuit court of appeals, and the reactions of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, provided further documented evidence of the thorough corrupt federal judiciary. These documented judicial acts could serve as the platform for major changes in the laws and protections available to the public, could bring about widespread criminal prosecution and impeachment of federal judges, and pry open the lid on the criminal activities that federal insiders have tried to expose.
More Information
Sequence of judicial events over the 20 year period.
Judicial attempts to obstruct justice and to block defenses against judicially-inflicted retaliation. and to block attempts by Stich and his group of government and non-government insiders to reports corruption and criminal activities by people in key government positions and in the federal courts.
Judicial retaliation against Stich for attempting to expose widespread corruption in government.
Federal lawsuit filed in U.S. district court at Reno, Nevada, against federal judges, addressing their obstruction of justice and felony retaliation against whistleblowers.
Defendant judges and defendant attorneys attempts to subvert the lawsuit.
Prior judicial involvement in obstruction of justice. This section shows decades of involvement in obstruction of justice by federal judges, up to and including the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Clicking on this section takes you to a list of various federal filings relating to Stich's attempts to expose widespread corruption in government and the judicial attacks upon him seeking to silence him.
The most visible signs of the consequences of this broad pattern of corruption in the three branches of government were the September 11, 2001, hijackings. However, if the public remains as indifferent to this information as in the past, they must be willing to accept the consequences that their prior indifference has brought about!
Related Web Sites
- Chronology of decades of corrupt activities by the CIA, U.S. politicians, and other members of the system, as described in the book, Defrauding America.
- Chronology of the arrogant and corrupt war on drugs--against the American people--as described in the book, Drugging America.
- Chronology of arrogant and corrupt activities in the deadly politics of aviation safety, as described in the book, Unfriendly Skies.
- Chronology of covert and corrupt activities in which the American people suffered the consequences of blowback, as described in the e-book, Blowback, 9-11, Iraq, Lies, and Coverups.
- Story of a CIA operation based in Honolulu and its titular head, who was made a scapegoat by CIA and Justice Department personnel and a federal judge, after its cover was blown, and as described in the e-book, Disavow.
Informational print and e-books books describing these matters can be ordered by clicking here.
Help fund our exposure activities by placing orders for any amazon.com products through our links.