Lawsuit in federal courts at WAshington seeking to report the criminal activities related to 9/11/

<body> Obstruction of Justice Tactics In District of Columbia Courts Former federal agent Rodney Stich continued to circumvent the massive cover-ups by filing a lawsuit in the federal courts in the District of Columbia, seeking to report the problems that enabled the 9/11 hijackings to occur, while simultaneously addressing the criminal aspects and the actions seeking to halt his exposure activities. That information was based upon what the corruption that he initially discovered while a key federal airline safety inspector. On June 7, 2002, he submitted for filing a lawsuit, seeking to report the criminal activities that played key roles in the conditions enabling four groups of terrorists to hijack four airliners on 9/11. That lawsuit also sought relief from the violations of federally protected rights that were part of the various schemes to halt his exposure activities. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) In blatant violation of the federal crime reporting statute, 18 U.S.C. § 4, and also legal filing requirements, federal judges refused to allow the lawsuit to be filed. In this way, federal judges continued the practice of blocking reports of high-level corruption.. Stich sent a letter sent to the court clerk requesting a reason for refusing to file the complaint. June 20, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) An order was issued on July 1, 2002, refusing to allow the filing of the appeal brief on the basis that 11 years earlier, on September 23, 1991, district judge Stanley Sporkin (former CIA legal counsel) had issued an order permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in any federal court without prior approval (which the record showed would never be given). (Adobe PDF) Another letter was sent to Judge Coleen Kollar-Kotelly, August 12, 2002, requesting an explanation for refusing to file the lawsuit. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Statement of issues raised in this appeal. September 30, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Stich filed an appeal brief, December 6, 2002, stamped received on December 9, 2002. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Appellate judges then issued an order refusing to hear the appeal on the basis of Judge Stanley's order 11 years earlier. January 16, 2003. (Adobe PDF) Stich then filed a brief with the court of appeals en banc, which notified every judge in the District of Columbia appellate court of the serious charges, January 25, 2003, stamped received on January 27, 2003. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) An order refusing to hearing the case was signed by court of appeal judges Edwards, Sentelle, Henderson, Randolph, Rogers, Tatel, and Garland, March 26, 2006. (Adobe PDF) Another order refused to hear the case by order of May 15, 2003. (Adobe PDF) All of these judges knew of the attempts by a former federal agent to report the documented criminal activities that had enabled to occur a long series of airline disasters, and which could be expected to have played a prominent role in the hijackings of four airliners on 9/11. All of the judges also knew that: The federal crime reporting statute required that federal judges receive information on a federal crime that was offered, and that the requirement is mandatory, as part of the judge's administrative duties. And that blocking the reports were felonies under the obstruction of justice statutes. Covering up for the documented criminal activities would, as in the past, continue the corruption and continue the record of resulting tragedies. In the aviation environment, this would mean a continuation of the history or subsequent deaths. Petition submitted to U.S. Supreme Court. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF) Collateral Damage from High Level Corruption Cover-Ups All forms of human tragedies have been inflicted upon the people of the United States from the corruption discovered by the people behind this site−and made possible by enablers in and out of government. The below pictures are only a sampling of the consequences from the documented corruption that are able to be portrayed graphically. The tragedies in other areas resulting from the corruption, cover-ups, and public indifference, are not shown here. United Airlines crash into New York City, the world's worst at that time. Withheld from the Amererica public were the reports by federal safety inspectors-investigators showing a continuing pattern of corruption, fraud, criminal alteration of major government required records−and the standard abuse of those few inspectors attempting to require the airline management to comply with industry standards and clear requirements of federal aviation safety requirements−and FAA management to require compliance. None of the guilty, the enablers, to these and the continuing fraud-related crashes ever were held accountable for the hundreds of deaths that they enabled to occur. These few examples of the horrors associated with airline disasters enabled to occur by documented corruption withheld from the American people. The standard culture of cover-ups in the United States enabled the corruption, cover-ups, to mutate into different areas. In the aviation area, although the continuing series of airline disasters eventually came to a halt for other reasons, the culture continued, and enabled to occur a number of easily preventable airline disasters. The inbred culture created the conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to easily hijack four airliners within a few hours of each other and kill nearly 3,000 people. In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences. Among the "Least" Guilty of the Enablers Email address for the author and activist against corruption in government: stich@unfriendlyskies.com. For more information relating to the author and his activities put "Rodney Stich" into a search engine such as Google or yahoo.com. The links run into many tens of thousands. Download DVD videos from amazon to rent or to buy, onto your Windows XP operation system computer. For more information, click here. To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link: Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts. Return to: www.defraudingamerica.com www.druggingamerica.com www.unfriendlyskies.com www.defraudingamericablog.com </body>