New Page 1

<body> Reason for Suing the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court Although it might sound bizarre to sue the justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, the gravity of the corruption, and the gravity of the consequences, not only in the continuing airline disasters but in the other areas of government affected by the corruption. Stich knew he could not prevail, but filed the action on the belief that he was making a judicial record of the charges, and that he would make a record of the defenses raised by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. The Justices acknowledge that they knew the charges made by Stich, but that they were totally immune from liability. Lawsuit filed against the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on the basis of their cover-ups and complicity in the obstruction-of-justice tactics by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities. Nr. 89-2941. October 20, 1989. (Adobe PDF) Dismissal by Judge Sporkin, former CIA legal counsel. January 17, 1990 (Adobe PDF) Stich filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals. In response, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court filed a motion for summary affirmance dismissal of the appeal. (Adobe PDF) Stich's opposition to the Supreme Court justices motion for summary affirmance/dismissal. May 22, 1990 (Adobe PDF) Surprise! the court of appeal judges granted the motion by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. Grave Consequences of That Cover-Up That cover-up by the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court continued their prior 15 years of cover-ups of corruption that Stich and a group of other former government agents sought to report, as they were required to do by the federal crime reporting statute, but also continued the corruption of federal judges over whom the Justices has supervisory responsibilities. In addition, the cover-ups continued the great harm being inflicted upon many people in the United States affected by the corruption, affected national security by covering up for the corruption in the FBI and CIA, as well as the FAA, that made possible the condition enabling terrorists to hijack four airliners on 9/11. Would terrorists have been able to hijack four airliners on 9/11 if the culture of corruption in key segments of the government's aviation safety offices did not exist and the known and long overdue preventatives measures to prevent hijackings had been put in place? The answer is that the 9/11 hijacking attempts would probably have been prevented, 3,000 people would not be dead, and the excuse to invade Iraq would not have existed. And that is how the ripple effects occur. </body>