Federal Criminal and Civil Laws and Constitutional Protections
Barring Dismissing LawsuitsThe tactics used by federal judges throughout the period from 1983 to 2000 when Stich exercised federal remedies against repeated massive violations of federal law, often without notice. These judicial tactics violated federal statutes, Supreme Court decisions, constitutional rights and protections, and the requirement by federal judges (or other federal officers) to receive information of a federal crime.
Their intention of the repeated dismissal was to block reports of the criminal activities in government offices that former federal agent Rodney Stich and his group of government insiders had discovered. Also, to block Stich from using federal defenses against the massive violations of state and federal laws that were occurring in parallel legal efforts to halt his exposure activities.
Standard Judicial Dismissal Tactic Was to Label Charges as Frivolous
The repeated tactic used was to place a frivolous label on each lawsuit filed by Stich, thereby reversing the legal and common-sense criteria for that term. 3,000 people died on 9-11 as a result of the misconduct that Stich had discovered as part of his official duties and which he sought to report under the federal crime reporting statute to a federal judge.
The labeling of the corruption that led to 3,000 deaths was hardly frivolous, as repeatedly stated by federal judges.
Repeatedly Violated the Federal Requirement That Allegations Stated in the Complaint Must be Accepted as True to Prevent Dismissal
Federal case law requires that the statements in the complaint be accepted as true, and that only if those statements do not state a federal cause of action could the lawsuit be dismissed. Multiple federal causes of actions were stated, including the mandatory requirement to report federal crimes to a federal court.
The lawsuit clearly stated facts and federal causes of action invoking mandatory court jurisdiction and relief.. In addition, taking judicial notice of the wrongful acts proved that the statements were true. The facts showed violations of record numbers of state and federal statutes and constitutional protections; orders rendered without jurisdiction; violations of the Civil Rights Act, Bivens, causes of actions arising under the Civil Rights Act and the Declaratory Judgment Act, .... Under law, a complaint "is not frivolous if any of the legal points [are] arguable on their merits ..." Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738.
Supreme Court decisions that bar the dismissal of any lawsuit if the complaint states a federal cause of action. Stich’s complaints stated multiple federal causes of actions.
Supreme Court decisions require that all allegations stated in the complaint must be accepted as true at that stage of the proceeding. Therefore, if any federal cause of action was stated, that barred dismissal.
Free books. For a listing of the books written by former government insiders on the continuing history of corrupt activities responsible for a continuing series of human tragedies, and to download at no charge segments of each of the books, click here.
These books are now the latest attempt by a coterie of lawyers and judges seeking to remove from public availability the books that expose their own complicity in the many areas of corrupt activities.
Email address for the author and activist against corruption in government: stich@unfriendlyskies.com.
For more information relating to the author and his activities put "Rodney Stich" into a search engine such as Google or yahoo.com. The links run into many tens of thousands.
Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts.
Return to: