Culture of Judicial Obstruction of Justice
Because of their position of trust, the
misconduct by federal judges that are detailed and
documented in these pages,
and especially in such books as Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, Mafia, and al Qaeda,
and Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries, have enabled to occur great
tragedies and catastrophic events far beyond the comprehension of most of the
public. The events of 9/11 are only one-day's consequences in a long line of
tragedies, with more to follow.
For years, the documented corrupt actions by federal judges engaging in obstruction of justice tactics to block former federal agents from reporting the corruption they found in high government positions. Their obstruction of justice tactics included the following (which are described in the various books written by former government insiders):
Blocking
former federal agent Rodney Stich
from reporting corruption activities in the
Federal Aviation Administration
that he sought to report through
lawsuits against the
FAA.
Blocking Stich
from reporting the corruption
in the political NTSB board offices.
Aiding and
abetting the sham lawsuit filed
by a CIA-front law firm whose intent was to strip Stich of his
life assets that Stich used to fund his various exposure activities (book
publishing and hundreds of radio and T appearances throughout the United
States).
Implicated in
the 20-plus years
of sham tactics by dozens of lawyers and law firms acting to halt the
reporting of the criminal activities by attacking the one person determined
to expose these crimes against the United States.
Rendering
orders permanently barring Stich from filing any papers in any federal
district or appellate court. The effect, and intent, of these unlawful and
unconstitutional orders was to prevent Stich from reporting making a record
of the criminal activities
via reporting them to a federal judge (as required by the federal crime
reporting statute), and to prevent Stich from exercising the various federal
defenses against the massive violations of federally protected rights that
initially occurred in the California courts with the CIA-front law firm, and
which later extended into major violations of federally protected rights in
the federal courts.
Rendering
unlawful and unconstitutional orders seize and liquidating Stich's $10
million in assets that funded his exposure activities. And then rendering
orders barring him from filing objections to the seizure and liquidation.
Sentencing
Stich to federal prison for six months after Stich filed papers under
the federal crime reporting statute to report the corruption that was
continuing to result in a series of fatal airline disasters, and the
corruption that affected national security.
For a
sequential highlight of the overall scheme that obstructed justice and made
possible some of the nation's worst catastrophic events,
click here.
For a
sequential highlight of the role played by over a hundred lawyers, law
firms, and judges, click here.
In carrying
out the 20-plus years of obstruction of justice tactics, California and
federal judges repeatedly
violated dozens
of state and federal laws, constitutional protections, and
criminal
statutes.
Among the many end results of this never-before revealed corruption were preventable airline disasters, great harm to the American people, and great harm to the former federal agent seeking to protect national interests by fighting the corruption.
Federal Judges as Major
Enablers of Catastrophic Events
The group for which the greatest amount of documented evidence exists that repeatedly blocked the reporting of ongoing corruption in the government's aviation safety offices responsible for an ongoing series of related airline disasters, and who blocked the reporting of other areas of criminal activities were federal judges.
From about 1967 to 2005, federal judges have repeatedly engaged in corrupt activities that included blocking a former federal agent and his coalition of other government agents and insiders from reporting the federal offenses to a federal court as required to be reported under the federal crime reporting statute. In addition, they engaged in other felonies, including retaliating against a former federal agent and witness for attempting to report the federal crimes.
Initial Admission of the Gravity of the Charges
During verbal argument before a three-judge appellate panel one of the judges admitted the gravity of the charges in the complaint filed by the former federal air safety agent. During verbal argument that judge said:
"Mr. Stich, these are serious charges, but they are for Congress to investigate."
Stich responded: "Congress refuses to investigate. But I am not asking you to investigate. I'm here to report the federal crimes to a federal judge as specifically required by Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. In that way I make a record, and when a federal judge performs his or her duty and receives it, that judicial record would require Department of Justice personnel to investigate."
One of Thousands of Deaths
Made Possible
By Documented Corruption By
Specific Federal Judges
Complicity of Supreme Court Justices
Complicity of Supreme Court justices that became a part of the schemes to block reporting of criminal activities, including those that enabled hijackers to seize four airliners on September 11, 2001.
From the first lawsuit filed in the late 1970s to 2004, the former federal agents filed legal papers in the U.S. Supreme Court and sent periodic letters to the Supreme Court Justices. These notifications advised each of the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court of serious matters affecting national security, and major misconduct being perpetrated by judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities and responsibilities under various criminal statutes. The writings advising them of such matters as:
The criminal activities (for which they had a responsibility to receive under Title 18 U.S.C. § 4).
The felony obstruction of justice by federal judges of continuing federal crimes related to continuing serious consequences.
The felony retaliation against a former federal agent and witness as retaliation for attempting to report major crimes against the United States and to block his reports.
The conversion of the federal courts into what met the legal criteria for a racketeering enterprise, with deadly consequences in the areas of airline disasters and terrorist attacks upon the United States.
In every case, the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court blocked any corrective action, blocked the former federal agent from relief from the criminal and civil rights violations that were responsibilities of federal judges.
The only favorable response−and that was limited to a letter received from Justice Bryon White−who sympathized with Stich but stated he was unable to help. (Justice Bryon's letter in jpg format.)
Federal Crimes Arising From
Judicial
Obstruction of Justice Tactics
Federal crimes committed by federal judges and Justice Department personnel in seeking to prevent the reporting of criminal and subversive activities.
Hoard of Lawyers as Major Enablers
In 1982, after the second edition of Unfriendly Skies was published, which named federal judges that blocked the reporting of the ongoing corruption in the government's aviation safety offices−and listed several major airline disasters that were made possible by the cover-ups−a CIA-FBI-front law firm in San Francisco filed a sham lawsuit against the former federal agent that violated and was barred by large numbers of California and federal statutes, controlling case law, rules of court, and constitutional protections. The lawyers involved in that sham litigation knew that they were halting the efforts by that former federal agent to report the ongoing deadly corrupt activities.
Their sham lawsuits were aided and abetted by over a dozen California judges, and which continued from 1982 to 1986. Their sham lawsuits were then followed by others, first by a government-related law firm in South Carolina and then was later followed by sham lawsuits filed by lawyers in the Los Angeles area.
Start of the legal actions by the CIA-FBI front law firm in San Francisco.
Laws violated by California judges.
California judges implicated.
Consider the following:
Without addressing the other areas affected by the criminal activities that Stich and his group of former government agents sought to report, and addressing only the corruption that affected the aviation environment:
IF the culture and corruption within the FAA did in fact exist (as overwhelming documentation shows), which included a history of blocking the implementation of procedures addressing the known safety problems, such as hijackings);
It would explain why the known and obviously long overdue measures to prevent the hijackings of the four airliners on 9/11 were not taken;
And the preventative measures to prevent airline hijackings did exist (and Stich made such recommendations);
And the need for such preventative measures was obvious from years of airline hijackings, plus the knowledge that airline hijackings were planned by Middle East terrorists);
And if lawyers did engage in legal actions knowing that they were blocking his reports, and most probably, intended to block the reports;
It becomes obvious that the long overdue preventatives measures were blocked by the legal tactics which constituted criminal obstruction of justice;
It then becomes obvious that if a citizen had perpetrated a minute fraction of these offenses that he would be criminally prosecuted for complicity in events that led to the 9/11 hijackings and 3,000 deaths. And these were only one-day's consequences, and only in the aviation area.
If these lawyers are guilty of any complicity in these events, we also have the complicity of the dozens of members of Congress who knew not only about the underlying criminal activities, but also the criminal obstruction of justice and criminal retaliation against the former federal agent. And the others, in the media and elsewhere, who also knew! Talk about the ugly Americans, what about the criminal Americans!
The next question: What are you going to do about this blatant criminal and even subversive conduct by dozens of lawyers?
The Public
Paid a Heavy Price
For the
Judicial Corruption
Since 1975, federal judges engaged in repeated unlawful, unconstitutional, and even criminal acts, to block the reporting of the criminal activities in the government's aviation safety offices, related to a series of preventable aviation disasters, including those caused by terrorist actions.
They All Knew What They Were Enabling to Occur
The evidence of the prior consequences of misconduct−and cover-ups−which were known to the federal judges and the lawyers acting in unison, made them fully aware of the consequences of their corrupt actions and schemes. The following are only a few of the many consequences.
In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences.
Sampling of related judicial files
Federal judges directly implicated in obstruction of justice tactics that resulted in a continuation of catastrophic consequences.
Laws violated by federal judges in a continuing pattern of obstruction of justice tactics and parallel massive civil rights violations.
Criminal contempt of court charges by federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors against a former federal agent for attempting to report high-level corruption.
Pattern of judicial retaliation against a former federal agent to block his reports of high-level corruption related to resulting great harm.
Sequence of judicial tactics that enabled to occur a continuation of great American tragedies.
Examples of the long series of judicial corruption attempting to block the reporting of high crimes against the United States.
List of legal filings related to attempts to report and halt the ongoing deadly corruption.
Corrupt misuse of judicial positions: criminal contempt of court charges for reporting high-level tragedy-related corruption.
Legal and judicial sequence of parallel schemes to block reporting of high-level corruption.
Help in deciding whether the dozens of federal judges that were directly involved in the corrupt activities that covered up for conditions that enabled a history of tragedies, deaths, and catastrophic events to occur, may come from the impeachment of two federal judges: Federal district court judge Samuel B. Kent, in Galveston, Texas, and judge Robert P. Aguilar, San Jose, California.
As described in the book, Defrauding America, Aguilar was impeached because he gave an incomplete answer about a phone call to an FBI agent that approached Aguilar while he was sun bathing on the beach at Waikiki. That phone call related to a phone conversation with his brother, who was under investigation by FBI agents.
Department of Justice personnel charges Aguilar with operating a racketeering enterprise, shortly after former federal agent filed a legal action accusing certain employees in the Department of Justice, and others, of corrupt activities, and shortly after Aguilar had rendered a number of decisions unfavorable to federal prosecutors.
Judge Samuel Kent was sentenced to 33 months in federal prison for lying to investigators about sexual harassment of his secretary. That sentence terminated his judicial position.
Astronomical Enlargement Of
Impeachment Justification
In a long series of documented facts, over 50 federal judges were directly involved in the matters stated at this page and in many other pages−plus the many other judges who knew of the judicial corruption−that did the following corrupt acts and enabled to occur the following tragic, deadly, and catastrophic events:
Activities that were corrupt, criminal, and met the legal definition of a racketeering enterprise; a conspiracy; obstruction of justice; retaliation against a witness; and several other criminal statutes.
Aided and abetted the people involved in the corrupt activities related to a series of prior fraud-related airline disasters.
Engaged in a 20-plus years of continuous obstruction of justice acts by repeatedly blocking the reports of criminal activities being made by a former federal agent and his group of other insiders. Those reports were made to a federal judge under the federal crime reporting statute. Federal judges, as part of their mandatory administrative duties, must receive all such information to prevent being guilty of obstruction of justice.
Federal judges repeatedly committed the crime of obstruction of justice, from the late 1970s to 2005.
Federal judges several times committed the crime related to retaliating against a witness and former government agent, to block the administration of justice and in retaliation for attempting to make such reports.
Federal judges repeatedly aided and abetted the gross violations of legal and constitutional protections being violated in the California courts by California judges and a CIA-FBI-front law firm and their lawyers, which were parallel schemes to halt Stich's continuing attempts to expose the high-level corruption.
Federal judges repeatedly violated procedural and substantive rights in the federal courts as part of the multiple schemes to prevent the public from learning about the continuing deadly corruption
Federal
Judges as Enablers To
Great American Tragedies
The repeated documented corrupt actions of federal judges, corrupting their judicial positions and the federal courts, enabled to occur such great tragedies, deaths, and catastrophic events as the following:
Continuation of airline disasters that occurred following the late 1970s initial obstruction of justice.
Continuation of the personal and financial harm to individuals, and to national security, from cover-up for the criminal activities that former federal agent Rodney Stich and his group of other former government agents and insiders sought to report.
The criminalization of the federal courts and the mutating effect upon most other government departments and government operations. Corruption of this magnitude does not occur in a vacuum, and it can be argued that the massive corruption in the housing and financial sectors−partly aided by people in government positions−would probably not have occurred if the initial corruption in other areas had not been covered up. Like a tree that grows from an acorn, enormous and catastrophic events mutated from the blatant corrupt acts of a large segment of the entire federal judge list.
The catastrophic events that occurred on September 11, 2001, and the resulting deaths, the war in Afghanistan, the war in Iraq, and the quagmire that will continue to inflict great harm upon Americans for years to come.
Among the most recent deaths made possible by the corrupt actions of federal judges were the nearly 4,000 direct deaths in the series of forewarned terrorist attacks; the 4,000-plus deaths and tens of thousands of wounded and maimed American military personnel, so far, and the estimated over one million death Iraqis.
Dismal Chance of Justice Occurring
People in control of the U.S. Department of Justice are heavily implicated and have their own criminal activities to hide.
Members of Congress are heavily implicated, and have their own criminal activities to hid.
Media people and media corporation have been years been complicit in covering up for the criminal activities and the cover-ups. One of the latest consequences of their cover-ups was the invasion of Iraq on a series of blatant lies that media people knew to be lies and failed to challenge the liars or to make the public aware of the evidence of the lying.
The dismal record of interest, and apathy, of the American people.
List of books on endemic corruption in the United States.
The "IF" Factor and 3,000 Deaths
Since so few American read books on these matters, they could not possibly understand the "butterfly" or ripple effects from the documented corruption that is also off their radar screen. If they were not so horribly illiterate about the serious conduct of the people in control of the government, they would recognize the "If" factor.
Three thousand people would not be dead on 9/11; the United States would not have become ensnared in two deadly wars through blatant lies that a non-illiterate public would have recognized that has already resulted in over a million deaths, injuries, and life-long crippling, and much more. None of this would have happened:
If the documented corruption of people in the government's aviation
safety offices had for decades
enabled to occur a long line of easily preventable
airline disasters.
If
federal judges did
not repeatedly, criminally, block a former federal agent and his coalition
from reporting these matters, combining their obstruction of justice with
multiple criminal retaliation actions.
If a hoard of
lawyers and law
firms had not been more interested in protecting the United States instead of
profitably engaging in corrupt and criminal acts that they knew were
subverting national interests and would continue to have catastrophic
consequences.
If the corrupt culture of personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice did not exist, whose actions were subversive to the United States, and constituted a greater harm, and greater source of actual harm, to the American people than any external terrorist. In addition, to cover-up for murders perpetrated by a key FBI supervisor in the New York City offices, FBI-DOJ personnel withheld the most important information that the United States had ever received from a key al Qaeda operative, which enabled to occur nearly 4,000 deaths in the subsequent terrorist attacks.
Evidence of a Powerful High-Level Force Orchestrating the Multiple Schemes And Protecting the Guilty
The years of multiple parallel schemes all focused on halting the publicizing activities of the former federal agent strongly indicates a powerful group in the U.S. Department of Justice was orchestrating these multiple events that included, for instance:
While Rodney Stich was a Key Airline Safety Inspector
He encountered cover-ups in virtually every government and non-government check and balance, including those people responsible for the internal checks and balances in the FAA.
The refusal of each department in the U.S. Department of Justice to respond to the serious charges made by a key federal agent.
The block by Department of Justice lawyers when the former federal agent appeared before a federal grand jury in Denver.
The block by members of Congress to react to the serious charges brought to them.
After Rodney Stich Resigned and Sought to
Expose the Corruption as a Private Citizen and Investigator
He was repeated blocked by federal judges, from 1967 to 2005, to receiving the reports of the corruption, despite their non-discretionary requirement to receive the data as part of their mandatory administrative duties and the federal crime reporting statute.
The series of sham lawsuits by over 50 lawyers and law firms from 1982 to 2005, that repeatedly violated dozens of state and federal statutes, controlling case law, and constitutional protections, that should have been promptly dismissed by the California courts.
The involvement of over a dozen California judges, with judicial records showing:
That they repeatedly aided and abetted the schemes by the CIA-FBI-front San Francisco law firm.
That they acted without personal and subject matter jurisdiction as clearly defined by specific state statutes.
That they protected the law firm and lawyers as the lawyers continued to act in blatant violation of state and federal laws.
That they refused to dismiss the sham action as required by state laws.
That they repeatedly charged Stich thousands of dollars for exercising procedural remedies specially prescribed by California statutes, case law, and rules of court.
Misconduct that met the federal case law criteria of a racketeering enterprise.
The repeated aiding and abetting by judges in the California appellate and state Supreme Courts, making them complicit in the corrupt schemes that all knew were interfering with the ability of the former federal agent in his attempts to expose the deadly corruption and bring about corrective actions.
Complicity of federal judges, with a 40 year judicial record showing:
Repeatedly blocking the attempts by former federal agent Rodney Stich and his coalition of other government agents and insiders from reporting to a federal court the continuing corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, and reporting other areas of criminal activities.
These repeated documented acts were felonies under the obstruction of justice statutes that apply to anyone, and especially federal judges whose non-discretionary administrative duties, and the clear wording of the federal crime reporting statute, mandate that they receive reports from anyone on a federal crime.
The unlawful and unconstitutional rendering of orders barring the former federal agent from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. The obvious intention of those orders were to:
Block the former federal agent from reporting the crimes against the United States that he and his coalition were attempting to report.
Block him from exercising the specific federal
remedies seeking a court order to halt the continuing massive
violations of federal protected rights that were occurring in
the California courts. The two major federal protections were
the Civil Rights Act as it related to the massive violations of
state and federal laws and constitutional protections; and the
Declaratory Judgment Act that would have halted the sham
lawsuits.
Repeatedly protected the CIA-FBI-front law firm and lawyers that were violating many state and federal laws and constitutional protections, which constituted federally protected rights, for which federal judges had mandatory responsibility to correct under the multiple federal statutes and controlling case law.
in 1986, charged the former federal agent with criminal contempt of law for attempting to report the criminal activities that he and his coalition had discovered. Among the federal crimes they sought to report included:
Drug smuggling involving CIA assets, and the protection by other government entities.
The October Surprise operation, information obtained by several CIA assets that were part of that operation.
And other
criminal
activities.
Federal judges and federal prosecutors charged the former federal agent with criminal contempt of court, denied him a jury trial, and sentenced him to federal prison for six months. These were felonies under the federal statute that bars adverse actions against a former federal agent or witness who seeks to report a federal crime. He was charged and sentenced to federal prison for attempting to report criminal activities in which Department of Justice personnel and federal judges were implicated.
Federal judges−acting with the hoard of lawyers involved in the parallel scheme to halt his exposure activities−corruptly seized and liquidated the $10 million in assets that funded his exposure activities. These assets were seized without the legal and constitutional right to notice of hearing, a hearing, and legal cause, constituting void orders. Federal judge Edward Jellen in Oakland, California then rendered an illegal order barring Stich from filing any objection to the seizure and liquidation. When Stich did file an objection, it was unlawfully unfiled and the judge charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for objecting to the seizure of his assets.
Two other federal judges in San Francisco, including Vaughn Walker and Marilyn Patel, charged Stsich with criminal contempt of court for having filed papers in a federal court in New York City, attempting to report the criminal activities.
Passive Judicial Obstruction of Justice Turned into
Criminal Obstruction of Justice
and Felony Retaliation
Against Witness and Former Federal Agent
Those passive cover-ups were soon followed by aggressive cover-ups, including obstruction of justice, felony retaliation against a former federal agent, and corrupt seizure of the $10 million in assets that funded his attempts to publicize and halt the deadly corruption. Sampling of related files:
Index of related files related to the aggressive tactics used by federal judges to cover up for ongoing high-level corruption related to an ongoing series of consequences.
Numerous other files relating to years of judicial obstruction of justice.
Federal judges implicated.
Court conduct meeting the definition of a racketeering enterprise.
Three Primary Not-For-Profit Books Related
To Widespread Internal Corruption
Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich
Sampling of early books reviews
Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.
All of these books are on the Kindle.
Miscellaneous Files
Supreme Court's Ceballos decision.
Supreme Court's decision opening floodgates for bribing or threatening elected officials.
Email address for the author and activist against corruption in
government: stich@unfriendlyskies.com.
For more information relating to the author and his activities put
"Rodney Stich" into a search engine
such as Google or yahoo.com.
The links run into many tens of thousands.
To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link:
Cell phone and service deal from amazon.com, with 30-day return if not satisfied.
Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts.
Return to: