Catalyst for Endless Terrorist Attacks On U.S. Targets:
Zionist Brutalities on Palestinians And
Pandering U.S. Politicians

Series of catastrophic terrorist attacks upon U.S. targets, including 9/11, and the American public still is ignorant about the primary causes. The continuation of the enabling causes, involving militant Zionist leaders in Israel and pandering U.S. leaders and politicians, insures that Americans continue to suffer the consequences. Ignore the evidence at this site, don't speak out, and take credit for enabling more of the same brutalities, pandering, and consequences.


Videos taken in Gaza and Palestine.


Hoax Played upon Gullible American Public
By Israeli and U.S. Politicians

The information at this site provides evidence of the corrupt culture of U.S. politicians and an insight into some of the many consequences. In this case, the consequences of pandering to the powerful Zionist Israel leaders, the aiding and abetting of shameless brutalities, and the series of lies and hoaxes played upon the uninformed American public as it relates to the Palestinians.


Israel's militant Zionist leaders will never abandon the permanent settlements it had built throughout the invaded Palestinian land, nor abandon Jerusalem. But by repeating the negotiation-lie over and over again, and using that hoax in denying Palestinians access to the United Nations decision remedies, the Zionist leaders, using pandering U.S. politicians as a tool, continues to breed attacks upon U.S. interests by people coming to the rescue of the Palestinians.


The standard lying rhetoric from U.S. politicians the about the Palestine situation covered up the elating to the brutal 45-year occupation and colonizing of Palestine land by militant Israeli leaders, Zionists,  made possible by pandering U.S. politicians. The American public has been targeted with outright lies, twisting of the facts, double standards, hypocrisy, that are ripe in politics, but blatantly prominent in the Israel-Palestine situation. Unless a person has the interest and the mental ability to look at enough facts, he or she is easily duped on the matter. The ugly truth is that self-interest U.S. politicians are and have been pandering for years to the militant Zionist faction in control of Israel and to the powerful Israel lobby. Some of the sham arguments repeated time and time again have been the following:

UN recognition of Palestine as a state would do the very opposite of what Israel and U.S. politicians stated. In no way would it interfere with impeding negotiations, negotiations that were deliberately blocked by Israel as they colonized all parts of Palestine while brutally treating the invaded people. Recognition would provide legal protection to the Palestinians against violence; a chance to fight back the invading Israelis; the right to take complaints to the International Criminal Court, and the International Court of Justice. Those are the things that Israeli politicians and their shills among America's leaders and politicians feared.


Zionists' Standard Evasive Answer: Negotiations

The evasive standard answers that the Zionist leaders in Israel give, as repeated by Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, appearing on the Charlie Rose Show (September 26, 2011), is the evasive response—negotiations. But what the Israeli leaders don't say is that their firm demands would never be accepted by the Palestinians—or any occupied people. As Israeli leaders have stated at various times, and as Netanyahu stated at various times during the Charlie Rose appearance, was the following:

During the Charlie Rose appearance, Netanyahu said that Israel would be for Jews, thereby admitting that it was an apartheid nation. During the same show, Netanyahu stated that Israel was a democratic nation. But that was blatantly false as non-Jews living in Israel are denied many of the rights that the Jews have.

Charlie Rose failed miserably in forcing Israel's prime minister to answer such questions as:

A concrete wall, stretching for about 500 miles, further show that Israeli leaders had no intention of returning the land to the Palestinians. That apartheid wall was condemned by the International Court of Justice, writing in part: “The construction of the wall and its associated regimes are contrary to international law,” read the document of the ruling, leaving little room for intentional misinterpretation. 

Sampling of atrocities against Palestinians in Gaza described in a 564-page United Nations Human Rights Commission report, the Goldstone Report. (Warning: long report.) Excerpts of that report reveals the atrocities aided and abetted by pandering U.S. politicians and presidents, and explains why people throughout the world want to kill Americans. These atrocities have been withheld from the American people by U.S. media people and media corporation through dumbing down with trivia. As expected, U.S. political leaders defended Israel and criticized the report. 

In American's Ignorance and Gullibility, Israel Trusts

By threatening U.S. politicians with threats of funding political oppositions, and making use of the pandering culture among U.S. politicians, and U.S. media control, Israel's militant Zionist leaders have:

Quick Comments In a Nutshell

No one with an iota of logic or conscience should reject the Palestinian state membership in the UN.

Details and evidence follows about the ethnic cleansing of Palestine by the militant Zionist faction in Israel aided and abetted by pandering politicians in the United States.

Contradictory Conduct (Lies) By
Israeli and U.S. PoliticiansWhile Brutalizing The
Palestinians and Feigning Peace Negotiations

Sampling of statements by Israeli political leaders:

Sampling of statements by pandering U.S. politicians and leaders:

Brutal Consequences for Palestinians—and
Deadly Ripple Effects for Americans


All of these actions contradicted the blatant lies that Israeli and U.S. politicians were stating. In one of the most glaring acts subverting national interest, they knew that it was this conduct that was the initial and continuing reason for decades of terrorist attacks upon U.S. targets.


Even after the early attacks upon U.S. targets resulting from Israel-U.S. brutality upon the Palestinians, Israeli and pandering U.S. politicians continued their deception, knowing that worse would surely befall the American people. And as history showed, these expected consequences did occur, with the victimized American public in a state of blissful ignorance.


(This writer lived for periods of time during the early 1950s in Jerusalem and Ramallah, as an airline captain flying Muslim pilgrims from throughout the Middle East to the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, on the hajj.)


Outraged non-Palestinians in nearby countries, unable to sit idly by as these outrages were being done to an otherwise peaceful people, did what they were able to do from a position of weakness. They engaged in attacks upon U.S. targets, each seemingly more deadly then earlier ones, including the 9/11 hijackings.


Al Qaeda operatives have repeatedly stated that their attacks upon United States interests result from Israel's invasion and brutal occupation of Palestine.



White House brushes aside ruling on separation fence
Ha'aretz 7/9/2004
The White House on Friday brushed aside a ruling by the International Court of Justice on the West Bank separation fence, saying it didn't think it was the right forum for addressing the issue. "We do not believe that that's the appropriate forum to resolve what is a political issue. This is an issue that should be resolved through the process that has been put in place, specifically the road map," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said aboard Air Force One as President George W. Bush was en route to a campaign tour in Pennsylvania.


"We do not believe that that's the appropriate forum to resolve what is a political issue. This is an issue that should be resolved through the process that has been put in place, specifically the road map," White House spokesman Scott McClellan said aboard Air Force One as President George W. Bush was en route to a campaign tour in Pennsylvania.

The brutal occupation of Palestine and of its people has been financially enabled by pandering U.S. politicians, as another example of how America's politicians make possible the great hatred and terrorist acts against the United States. As estimated $5 billion a year of U.S. taxpayers' money is given to the Zionist state of Israel.


Arrogant Threats of  by Israeli and U.S. Politicians
if Palestinians Seek Relief from Brutality Through
UN Statehood Recognition or Observer Status


Middle East Monitor (September 22, 2011) described hard-liners in Israel threatening Palestinians with even more atrocities if the Palestinians seek United Nations recognition of their plight."

According to a report in  Israel's Yedioth Ahronoth newspaper, Israel's foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, warned  Israel's Prime Minister  Benjamin Netanyahu with removal if Netanyahu did not take [more]  punitive measures against Palestinians if the Palestinians went ahead with their bid for United Nations recognitions. Netanyahu was warned that he must cancel the Oslo Accords, he must annex the large West Bank settlement blocs, and withhold tax transfers to the Authority.

That report suggests that a small but powerful militant bloc in Israel is responsible for dictating the actions by U.S. politicians that have already resulted in several decades of attacks upon U.S. targets, including 9/11, with more to come.

Free Gaza Movement.


Almost Total Colonization of Palestine by Israel

The below map shows Israel's invasion, occupation, and colonization of Palestinian land—with the aid and abetting of pandering U.S. politicians.


As admitted by one Zionist, the reason for continued placement of permanent settlements in the occupied territory with large numbers of Jews would change the population from mostly Palestinians to a combination with Jews from Israel, and now no longer be recognized as a separate nation.


Over 300,000 Israelis have been placed into permanent settlements throughout the occupied Palestine territory, and they have stated they will shoot to kill anyone that forces them from their home in the occupied land. The mere presence of the settlements throughout Palestine shows that the militant Israeli leaders have no intention of  leaving, and are lying their way to colonizing the entire seized territory.


Sampling of Brutalities Upon Palestinian People
Enabled by Pandering U.S. Politicians

For 20 years while the Zionist state of Israel and pandering U.S politicians were jointly brutalizing and colonizing Palestine, and claiming their interest in peace negotiations, they were simultaneously doing the opposite. Life was grim for the Palestinians. While Israeli and U.S. politicians were paining bring pictures of peace progress,

Bodies of Young Girls

One of many writings about Israeli war crimes against civilians was the posting in "Live From Occupied Palestine," ( (

On January 23 [2009], just days after the Israeli military finished its 22-day war against the 1.5 million inhabitants of the Gaza Strip, Israel’s military censor banned both the Israeli and international media from publishing the names of, or information about, Israeli military officers who participated in the war. The ban came a result of growing calls for the Israeli government and military to be charged with war crimes.

According to the January 23 Tel Aviv Haaretz daily, the Israeli government is fearful that the publication of names, as well as interviews given by Israeli military officers describing the destruction of Palestinian homes or harm inflicted on Palestinian civilians, would be used to prosecute them and the troops under their command.

Israel’s assault on Gaza, which began on December 27, resulted in the deaths of more than 1400 Palestinians. According to the Palestinian Centre for Human Rights, 90% of those killed were civilians, with at least 400 children. In addition, more than 5300 Palestinians were wounded, many critically.

Israelis Even Murdered U.S. Navy Personnel
Protected by Pandering U.S. Politicians!

The United States has gone to war against nations for doing far less than what Israeli leaders have done to the United States. A few examples:

U.S. politicians protect and defend the repeated attacks on the U.S.S. Liberty by Israeli forces that killed U.S. sailors. If any other country had done that, the U.S. would have started a war against the country. In the matter of the U.S. invasion of Iraq, President L.B. Johnson fabricated the Tonkin Gulf attack upon a U.S. destroyer to start a war that killed over a million Vietnamese, including tens of thousands in the CIA's Phoenix assassination program.


Top Navy Admiral Revealed Deliberate Israeli Attack
And Withholding of Help by U.S. Politicians


Explaining the sordid details of what happened was Admiral Thomas, former Chief of Naval Operations, and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of  Staff.


Sampling of Other Israeli Crimes Against the United States

An espionage case that had threatened United States relations with Israel and stirred talk of the death penalty ended [when Kadish] pleaded guilty in federal court in Manhattan to reduced charges [reduced because of his age] of leaking classified military documents to the Israeli government in the 1980s.]


Mr. Kadish's case has been linked to the case of Mr. Pollard, which has long been a matter of contention between the United States and Israel, whose leaders have argued, unsuccessfully, for Mr. Pollard's release.

Pandering to Israel's powerful political lobbies, such as AIPAC, these U.S. politicians sought to advance their own political self interests, despite the fact that their conduct was generating great hatred for the United States and responsible for the continuing terrorist attacks.


For some U.S. politicians, the shifting of loyalty from the nation's interests to the right-wing militant Israel government was out of fear; fear of having powerful Israel lobbies fund opposition parties, threatening their continuing in Congress. In this way, the ripple effect, they harmed the long-term interests of Israel, and doomed the people of the United States and the nation to decades of terrorist attacks.


These U.S. politicians sought self-serving short-term electoral gains by pandering also to those Jewish voters in favor of the hostile Israel actions and right-wing Christians in the United States. They ignored the many Israelis and Jewish people that opposed the brutal occupation of Palestine.


Learn more about the culture of politicians in the U.S. Congress during the past 50 years and the other tragedies made possible by their pathetic culture.

Decades of Attacks Upon U.S. by People
Outraged by Atrocities Enabled by Israeli
And pandering U.S. Politicians

The starting point for world-record hatred for the United States has been the1967 invasion of Transjordan (Palestine) and the 40-plus years of brutality, humiliation, and murders perpetrated by Israel upon people in the occupied territory. This hatred and growth of terrorists was then further fueled by the actions of U.S. Politicians providing Israel with war machines to kill the people in the occupied territory, and further inflamed by the political decision to invade Afghanistan and Iraq and kill, maim, and wound over a million innocent people.

The hijackings of four airliners on September 11, 2001, were a ripple effect from the United States aiding and abetting Israel's brutal occupation and killing of thousands of innocent civilians in Palestine, Gaza, and Lebanon.

As the hatred for the United States grew, U.S. leaders and politicians further inflamed millions of people by invading on a series of lies Afghanistan and Iraq.

People throughout the Middle East, other than the normally peaceful Palestinians, are outraged by the brutal occupation ands treatment of the Palestinians, forcing them to use the only means available to them since the United Nations have been repeatedly blocked in taking action to address these human rights outrages by repeated vetoes from U.S. politicians.

Lebanese Hezbollah, a Shiite political and social organization, were so outraged that they periodically waged war against the Zionist state of  Israel. People from other nations, such as Osama bin Laden, also outraged by the brutality of Israel's militant leaders, sought to strike back at the United States. Although no one can support their form of retaliation, they felt they had a cause. The American public, brain-washed by their politicians pandering to the lobby group of the Zionist state of Israel, and kept ignorant by mainstream U.S. media personnel and media groups with a culture like that of the Murdoch media group, and political pundits, especially at Murdoch's Fox "News Channel," don't recognize the relationship between U.S. political leaders and the decades of catastrophic terrorist attacks.

American Media: 
Keep the American Public Dumbed Down
While Protecting Israeli Crimes!

Singer Tony Bennett said to radio host Howard Stern (September 2011), referring to the terrorists' 9/11 attacks:

"They flew the plane in, but we caused it, because we were bombing them and they told us to stop."

That basically correct statement, even admitted by Osama bin Laden, caused a media uproar. Bennett was then forced to apologize for an absolutely correct statement, stating, "There is no excuse for terrorism and the murder of the nearly 3,000 innocent victims of the 91 attacks on our country." He was again correct, but the American people are so uninformed and diverted with obsession with trivia, that they can't see the obvious.

Hezbollah is a Shiite military, political and social organization in Lebanon with strong ties to Iran and Syria. Over the past generation, it has transformed itself from a shadowy militant group known primarily for terror attacks to the country’s pre-eminent political and military force. The United States regards Hezbollah as a terrorist group that is financed by Iran to extend its influence.

Israeli Occupation and Brutalities Catalyst For
Years of  Terrorist Attacks
On U.S. Targets

The attacks of September 11, 2001, and a series of earlier terrorist attacks, had their original roots in the Israeli-U.S. conduct toward the besieged Palestinians.
Powerful Israel forces repeatedly claimed that Israel is a friend of the United States and that it must deny to the Palestinian people every possible legal remedy against the brutal Israeli occupation. Let's look at some of the tragic events upon America and its people resulting from U.S. politicians aiding and abetting and pandering too the militant right-wing Israel government:

There is no way that the United States can protect itself from the anger-fueled determination by millions of people wanting to kill Americans and harm U.S. interests. In the United States, no thought whatsoever has been given to why so many people hate the United States.


Also check, and for more on the history of serious misconduct by U.S. leaders check

Over a Hundred UN Resolutions Against Israel's
Brutalities—With Relief Blocked by U.S. Vetoes

Dozens of United Nations Resolutions have been issued against Israel relating to brutal and humiliating occupation. Subservient U.S. politicians and threats against other nations, including withholding funds, has enabled Israel to enjoy international immunity against material actions being taken. The American people, and national security, suffered a series of brutal attacks by victims and others outraged by this conduct. These attacks have dramatically altered life for the American people, who, mostly, to this date, haven't the faintest clue as to why they are under attack.

In the book, "Deliberate Deceptions: Facing the Facts About US-Israeli Relationship," former Congressman Paul Findley, one of the few members of Congress not pandering to Israeli militants, states the Israel, with the collusion of the power elite of the United States, has successful blockade the United Nations from providing relief to the Palestinians against the militant acts of Israeli politicians. The constant veto and threat of veto by U.S. politicians has kept the flames of hatred burning against the United States enablers.


From 1967 to 1989 the UN Security Council passed 131 resolutions directly addressing the Arab–Israeli conflict. In early Security Council practice, resolutions did not directly invoke Chapter VII. They made an explicit determination of a threat, breach of the peace, or act of aggression, and ordered an action in accordance with Article 39 or 40.

Resolution 54 determined that a threat to peace existed within the meaning of Article 39 of the Charter, reiterated the need for a truce, and ordered a cease-fire pursuant to Article 40 of the Charter. Although the phrase "Acting under Chapter VII" was never mentioned as the basis for the action taken, the chapter's authority was being used.

The United Nations General Assembly has adopted a number of resolutions saying that the strategic relationship with the United States encourages Israel to pursue aggressive and expansionist policies and practices. The 9th Emergency Session of the General Assembly was convened at the request of the Security Council when the United States blocked efforts to adopt sanctions against Israel. The United States responded to the frequent criticism from UN organs by adopting the Negroponte doctrine.

Palestinians Forced to Seek Relief
Through Recognition of Statehood

After over 40 years of brutal occupation, made possible by pandering U.S. politicians, the Palestinian Authority decided to file an application with the United Nations Security Council for United Nations recognition as a state. In the event that this would be vetoed by U.S. politicians, then the Palestinian Authority decided to file with the United Nations General Assembly for enhanced observer status. (The Vatican has that status, and Switzerland had that status initially until it became a UN member in 2002.) (A veto would be "necessary" only if nine out of the 15 council members voted to grant statehood recognition.)


As an observer state, Palestine could participate in debates within the Assembly, accede to treaties, join specialized UN agencies such as the Law of the Sea Treaty, the International Civil Aviation Organization, and the International Criminal Court. But it could not vote, could not sponsor resolutions, and could not suggest candidates for Assembly committees. But under the Law of the Sea Treaty, Palestine could protest to the Court of Justice the Israel blockage, and protest Israel's natural-gas offshore claims.


Also, as member in the International Criminal Court, Palestine, as an observer state, could ask the International Criminal Court to investigate alleged Israeli war crimes and other crimes that Israel committed in Palestine. These would include those occurring after July 2002, the attacks on Gaza in 2008 and 2009, and also the attacks on the Peace for Gaza flotillas.


A New York Times article quoted Palestine leader Abbas stating, “We have exhausted all opportunities, so we have to go to the UN."


Israel's Murderous Attack on Flotilla
Bringing Supplies to Palestinians in Gaza


In May 2010, ships with people from many nations set out to bring 10 thousand tons of air to the Palestinians in Gaza. Israeli forces boarded and attacked the passengers, killing nine of them. They focused on the flagship of the flotilla, the Turkish ship, Mavi Marmara. (You Tube video of raid: International outrage (except in docile United States) was outrage, with mass protests and riots in, some countries.


Israel and U.S. Politicians Threatening Palestinians
 If They Seek End to Brutal Colonizing

Finally forced by decades of obstacles by U.S. and Israeli politicians to regain their seized land, Palestinians decided to seek relief in the United Nations via Statehood. In response, Israel and U.S. politicians vowed reprisals. U.S. politicians and Israel's militant leaders warned of dire consequences if the Palestinians went ahead with their plans.

"Dire consequences" for an oppressed and occupied people to seek statehood? That was the only option for Palestinians after 30 years of being rebuffed, humiliated, killed, while Israel builds permanent settlements throughout the occupied territory making obvious it had no intention of halting its occupation. U.S. politicians threatened to cut off financial assistance, shut down a Washington-based Palestinian organization, while Israel threatened its own retaliation.

U.S. and Israeli leaders and politicians engaged in sham arguments, in the words of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, that going to the United Nations would “set back peace.” But there was no peace, and Israel's massive building of permanent settlements deep inside the occupied territory made it obvious to anyone but a moron that Israel had no intention of vacating the seized land.

How can seeking resolution of the gross invasion and occupation problems, the humiliation, the murders of innocent people, be a problem, or, as ridiculously stated, "set back peace!" Solving those problems are some of the basic functions of the international body.

What lame excuse could U.S. and Israeli politicians use? The truth is, and as shown by the massive building of permanent settlements throughout the occupied territory, Israel's militant leaders had no intention of a state for Palestine, and this deception was aided and abetted by a mass of pandering U.S. politicians. As anyone with street smarts can recognize, even more anger against the U.S. results from this arrogant contempt for oppressed people.

Outrage to Threats


"Dire Consequences"—Zbigniew Brzenzski

Veterans Today had an article (September 19, 2011) by Debbie Menon addressing the warning given by Zbigniew Brzenzski on MSNBC's "Morning Joe" program, warning of dire consequences if the United States blocks statehood for Palestine. The article stated:

“If we take a vote against Palestinian Independence in the UN, it is not only a serious strategic error but a tragic historical error.”

Zbigniew Brzezinski has just returned from a regional conference in Russia, he discusses the absence of any strategic sense of direction in US foreign and Middle East policy. He makes some policy recommendations.

He stresses “the stakes are high,”… and claims “a new era is upon us.” In his view “…not an era of democracy but an era of populism.” “Popular views are harder, tougher and uncompromising” he asserts. He shares the view of the Europeans that “America’s position in the Middle East is disintegrating in between our eyes” without direction; “We have missed the boat here,” he asserts. When asked about his view on the UN Vote on Palestine statehood coming up, he said…if we take a stand against Palestinian independence, it is not only a serious strategic error but a tragic historical error… it will end up very tragically for all concerned… us, the Middle East, specifically for the Palestinians and in the long run for Israel.

United States in Lunatic Phase

On domestic matters, I like his use of choice of words, “lunatic phase,” “never-never land,” “unrelated to reality.” “1% ownership of the world.

[Brzenzski was United States National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter from 1977 to 1981.]

United States "More Toxic" in the Arab World

A Financial Times article (September 19, 2011), titled, "US diplomats race to prevent Palestinian "train wreck', adding:

Prince Turki al-Faisal, the former Saudi Arabian ambassador to the US and part of the ruling family, last week warned that an American veto would end the allies' "special relationship" and make the US "toxic" in the Arab world. [Or, even more toxic than it already is!]

Blocking the move would also undercut the US's authority as a genuine mediator in the peace proc3ess that Mr. Obama has only halfheartedly pursued since taking office.

Exactly a year ago this week, Barack Obama stood at the podium at the UN General Assembly and declared his support for a Palestinian state. Palestinians will never know the pride and dignity that comes with their own state," Mr. Obama told the general assembly, unless the two parties reached a peace agreement. [Actions by Israel's hard liners would never agree to releasing the seized territory.]

So it will be with some degree of awkwardness that Mr. Obama returns to the UN this week and directs his representatives to vote against a plan that would lead to Palestinians reaching exactly that destination. The US president will be acutely aware of how hypocritical he must appear: voicing support for democratic transitions across the Middle East at the same time as scuppering Palestinian aspirations for recognition.

The chances of protests, particularly in the West Bank, if Palestinians are emboldened by a veto, are not insignificant. The US could further inflame the situation if Congress makes good on its pledge to cut off $600 million in annual aid.

[Political Threat from Powerful Israeli Lobbies]

Mr. Obama also has domestic considerations to bear in mind. With 14 months to go until voters decide whether to give him a second term, the president hardly wants to run foul of the powerful Jewish lobby in the US and the millions of dollars it has to inject into political campaigns.

In Middle East newspapers and Internet sites, it was clear that if thee United States blocked the plight by Palestinians for an end to the brutality, anger toward the United States would be ever greater than it already was. That would pose the threat of even more terrorist attacks.



Israel's Zionist Leaders Used Sham Negotiating Argument
As a Blatant Ruse to Continue Colonizing Palestine


Using U.S. politicians, and even the president of the United States as shills, Israel's hard-line Zionist leaders never had any intention of abandoning the seized and colonized Palestine territory.  They had no intention of returning to the pre-invasion border, nor abandoning Jerusalem, not abandoning the settlers and permanent settlements throughout the Palestine territory.


Many Jews in Israel, and throughout the world, are against the apartheid Zionist government. Many Jewish groups have shown far more interest in the plight of the Palestinians than the average non-Jew in the United States. These groups have held protests and frequently meet to generate interest in the outrages inflicted by the Zionist bloc in Israel.


She charade by conniving Zionist militantsaided and abetted by pandering U.S. politicianshave duped most Americans and created such great anger among people throughout the Middle East and Africa that the United States continues to suffer a continuing series of terrorist attacks. Shrewd Dumbing down the American people, in this way, does have consequences!


Little does the American public know, the pandering by U.S. politicians pandering to Israel's Zionist group has come with a terrible price, as shown by the series of terrorist attacks by people outraged over the harm inflicted by Israel's Zionist government and its supporters among most U.S. politicians.


Adding fuel to the fire fanned by Israel's militant Zionist leaders, that has already resulted in horrible consequences for the United States, pandering Republicans such as Governor Rick Perry, Michelle Bachmann, Texas evangelical Pastor John Hagee, the Christian evangelicals, of Texas, all stated Obama wasn't given enough support for Israel and tacitly approved what Israel's leaders were doing to the Palestinians that had already spurred decades of attacks upon U.S. targets because of U.S. support for Israel's conduct.


The Financial Times (September 28, 2011) stated of Perry: "Mr. Perry's response to a question ... was so incoherent that by comparison it made Sarah Palin look like Henry Kissinger."


Explosive Consequences Ahead
Including for Americans


Israel's Zionist leaders and supporting U.S. politicians surely recognized the dire consequences that would arise from finally calling a halt to the decades of bluffing about statehood for Palestine. Many obstacles will prevent the orderly transfer. For instance:

The concern in Israel is that subsequent [Palestinian] rallies could get out of control and target large numbers of Israelis, risking a bloody crackdown that could spark a new Palestinian uprising. Shlomo Vaknin, security chief of the Yesha Council, the main settler organization, said,  "If there are 2,000 [Palestinian] demonstrators facing the [settlement] alert squads armed with M-16s, it will surely not be photogenic," he said. "Tolerance ends at the settlement fence."

Palestinians cannot be expected to accept this taking. A normally very peaceful people, they have been extremely docile during the decades of brutal treatment by Israel. But people in other countries, especially the Arabs, have been outraged, and this outrage manifested itself in a series of brutal terrorist attacks. These attacks can greatly increase in areas that will cripple normal domestic and international life for Americans.


American troops in Afghanistan and Iraq could end up in a Dunkirk-like situation if the outrage against Americans spread due to the Palestine matter. And with the possible of weird and probably incompetent politicians taking control of the White House and worsening what is already in Congress, America is due for times much worse then they have already brought down upon themselves. Stand by for a rough road ahead!


Reaction to Filing for Statehood

Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas spoke before the United Nations General Assembly (September 23, 2011) and formerly requested the United Nations to recognize the Palestine territory as a state. He was greeted with a long round of applause as he began his speech. Abbas stated that Israel was in a "race against time to redraw the borders," harming the lives of tens of thousands of Palestinian families. He was repeatedly given a standing ovation by the UN members.

Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu then spoke, and repeatedly condemned the United Nations, showing contempt for that organization. Many of the UN members walked out as he talked.

Following the application for UN membership, the application is sent by the secretary general to the Security Council  for consideration and to the General Assembly for information purposes. The Security Council with five permanent and ten elected members can vote on the application. If nine of them approve it, the application then goes to the General Assembly.

If  nine Security Council members approve the application, it then goes to the General Assembly for a final vote. Unless any of the five permanent members blocks it by a veto. The five permanent members are the United States, Russia, Britain, China, and France. The United States has blocked the United Nations from issuing proclamations against Israel dozens of times, despite often unanimous approval by the other Security Council members. IF the U.S. did not veto it (U.S. always protects Israel's brutal acts in Palestine or anywhere!), the General Assembly then votes on it. If two-thirds of the members, 120, vote for it, it then passes.

The so-called quartet consisting of the United States, the European Union, Russia and the United Nations, called on Israelis and Palestinians to resume negotiations without preconditions. That unacceptable condition approved Israel proceeding with further permanent construction and colonization, and covered up for the fact that Israel will never agree to vacate Jerusalem; to abandon the settlers in permanent settlements throughout the Palestine territory; to block Palestinians from returning to Israel where they were forcible removed from their homes. The negotiation argument by the United Nations quartet was a sham, which the Palestine Authority properly rejected.

Israel's Zionist Leaders Thumb-to-the-Nose Reaction

Showing total contempt for the United Nationsand the gullible U.S. public—four days after the UN appearance, Israel's Zionist leaders promptly announced building 1,200 permanent housing units in their de facto colonization of Palestine. A New York Times article (September 28, 2011) titled, "Israel Angers Palestinians With Plan for Housing," stated:

Israel announced plans on Tuesday for 1,100 new housing units in an area of South Jerusalem outside Israel's pre-1967 boundaries. The move reflects Israel's continued rejection of Palestinian demands for a halt in settlement construction as a condition for peace talks. Over the last 18 months, Israel has repeatedly made awkwardly timed announcements of building plans in disputed and occupied areas. The Palestinians walked out of nascent peace talks a year ago after a 10-mont Israeli moratorium on settlement construction expired.

"On Friday, the group known as the quartetUnited States, the United Nations, Russia and the European Unionissued a statement  ...[for] the two sides "to refrain from provocative actins" ... that called, among other things, for stopping all Israeli settlement building.

The Gilo area was conquered from Jordan in the 1967 war, along with East Jerusalem and the West Bank, and Israel later annexed it t the city of Jerusalem, a step that has never been recognized internationally. The Palestinians claim East Jerusalem as the capital of a future state.

The Financial Times stated (September 28, 2011): "This is a typical unilateral act of the Israeli government that is prohibited by international law. It reflects a total disregard to calls by almost everyone to stop the settlement activity."

Israel and Its Pandering Shills in U.S. Congress:
Source of Great Harm to Americans

U.S. politicians and other shills for Israel's hardliners, repeatedly made statements that required a dumbed-down American public for an audience. For instance:

The familiar line, "The United States Must Support Israel at the U.N. (Scandal scarred Murdoch's Wall Street Journal of September 16, 2011):

Many people in, the U.S. State Department privately complain that they appear to work for the Israeli government

The Jerusalem Post reported that the U.S. had joined Israel in lobbying [and bribing] over 70 nations—many receiving financial aid from the United States, like the tiny Caribbean island nation of Grenada, to vote against denying the Palestine state application.

An op-ed in The New York Times by Saudi Prince Turki al-Faisal warned that if the U.S. opposed the Palestine bid for statehood, it would jeopardize the “special relationship” between the two nations. He stated:

"The United States must support the Palestinian bid for statehood at the United Nations this month or risk losing the little credibility it has in the Arab world. If it does not, American influence will decline further, Israeli security will be undermined and Iran will be empowered, increasing the chances of another war in the region."

A article in the Financial Times (September 26, 2011) titled, "Putting the peace process into peace" stated in part:

For weeks, in fact, American and European officials had dramatically sought to avoid that moment, waving big threats and few small inducement. Israel warned of financial sanctions and predicted violence would erupt on the ground. Much to their frustration Mr. Abbas would not yield. Instead of lamenting his new boldness, western governments should treat the Palestinian leader's UN bid for what it is: a much needed wake-up call, a warning that the so-called peace process of the past 20 years has been a dismal failure [a hoax!] and that the hope for a two-state solution that delivers security of Israel and a viable state for Palestinians is on its death bed.

After two decades of fruitless negotiations, during which Israel's colonisation of Palestinian land through settlements expansion has continued unabated, Mr. Abbas has embarked on the only path left open to him. It is a diplomatic path that dramatically raises his cause on the world stage. His insistence that peace talks could not proceed while Israel pursues its settlement policy is no more than what President Barack Obama himself had set out as a pre-requisite for successful negotiations. Mr. Obama later dropped the condition when faced with Israeli intransigence [and threat of losing Jewish voters!].

The Obama administration's behaviour towards the Palestinian bid is shattering the little credibility that remains for the US in the Arab world.


Evidence Indicating Israeli Zionists Want Annexation, not Peace

The bid for UN recognition would force attention to, and a resolution of the Palestine problem. The most probable reason for the vehement objection to the UN attention to the problem is that Israel's militant Zionist leaders, as shown by the permanent settlements and the huge 500-mile concrete wall, that it wants annexation, not a settlement that deprives Israel of the Palestine land that it had already annexed.

Rare U.S. Media Objections

A New York Times l (September 12, 2011) stated:

A United Nations vote on Palestinian membership would be ruinous.
New York City Mayor Ed Koch, shillings for the extreme Israel faction, sought to enhance his standing with the extreme Israel faction by stating that the recent defeat of a Democrat in the traditionally Democratic New York City district was a repudiation of Obama's policies toward Israel, in urging a settlement by Israel based upon the 1967 borders, "as a message to President Obama that he cannot throw Israel under a bus with impunity."

A New York Times editorial (September 15, 2011) stated of this pandering to the extreme Israeli fringes:

Mr. Koch played a cynical game in urging special-election voters to choose the Republican as a rebuke to Mr. Obama for saying the Israel's pre-1967 borders—with mutually agreed land swaps—should be the basis of any peace agreement. [Israel's Mr. Netanyahu has been the most intractable, building settlements and blaming his inability to be more forthcoming on his conservative coalition.

Now, Mr. Obama is risking American ties with a fast-changing Arab world by vowing to veto the Palestinians statehood bid at the United Nations.

Another New York Times article (September 15, 2011) focused on the danger to Democrats for daring to support a peaceful solution to the Israel occupation and the political pandering that occurs. The article stated:

2 Sides Seek Jewish Vote. Policies Toward Israel May Hurt Democrats

Not since Jimmy Carter in 1980 has a Democrat running for president failed to win a lopsided majority of the Jewish vote. Republicans see a chance to change that in 2012, with President Obama locked in a tense relationship with Israel's leaders criticized by American Jews for being too tough on a close and favored ally. Tuesday's Republican upset in New York's Congressional election, they say, is a sign of bad things to come for Mr. Obama.

Seeing trouble, the Obama campaign and Democratic Party leaders have mobilized to solidify the president's standing with Jewish voters. The Democratic National Committee has established a Jewish outreach program. The campaign is singling out Jewish groups, donors and other supporters with calls and e-mails to counter the Republican narrative that Mr. Obama is hostile to Israel. [i.e., not pandering enough to radical fringe group in control of Israel government!]

American Jews are clearly less enchanted with Mr. Obama than they were in 2008, when nearly 8 out of 10 voted for him (in a Gallup poll last July, the most recent month for which data was available, his approval rating was 60 percent). Jewish lawmakers have been warning the White House that this disaffection could hut the president in turnout, fundraising and enthusiasm.

[Republican Politicians Sabotaging American Interests]

Republican groups are determined to make Israel a wedge issue. In recent days, billboards went up around New York City showing Mr. Obama smiling and shaking hands with the Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas, and declaring the president is "Not Pro-Israel." The Republican Jewish Coalition said it planned to use the same tactics in other districts with substantial numbers of Jewish voters in 2012.

What Republicans Are Saying About Israel:

[Under a picture of Mitt Romney] "President Obama has thrown Israel under the bus. He has disrespected Israel and undermined its ability to negotiate peace. He has also violated a first principle of American foreign policy, which is to stand firm by our friends."

[Under a picture of Michele Bachman, "Sees a divine mandate to support Israel"]: "We believe very strongly that nations also receive blessings as they bless Israel." In 2010 she warned that "if we reject Israel, then there is a curse that comes into play."

[Under a picture of Rick Perry, "Cites a natural affinit8y between Texas and Israel"] "I mean, we're talking about two groups of people who were willing to give up their lives for freedom and liberty." [While invading, occupying,, and killing people in the invaded territory!]


The Nation article (September 22, 2011) "Obama's UN Debacle," hostage to militant Israel politicians and subservient U.S. politit8icans, especially the Republicans.

A Veterans Today posting (September 22, 2011, referred to Zionist Israel dictating America's future to U.S. president and U.S. politicians.

Pandering U.S. Politicians Denying to Palestinians
Basic United Nations Access

In October 2011, while Palestinians were waiting for a decision on joining the United Nations as a full member state, Palestinians requested  joining the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). The purpose of that UN group is described as contributing to peace and security, seeking international collaboration through education, science, and culture, and to further universal respect for justice, the rule of law, and the human rights along with fundamental freedoms proclaimed in the UN Charter. It is the heir of the League of Nations' International Commission on Intellectual Cooperation.

A Financial Times article (October 31, 2011) stated:

Officials predict an over-whelming majority in favour of Palestinian membership. An initial vote on the Unesco executive board this month went 40-4 in the Palestinians' favour. Under current US legislation, a decision to admit Palestine as a member of Unesco would force an immediate cut-off in American funding for the Paris-based body. ... Palestinian leadership would also seek to gain membership of other international bodies, such as the World Health Organisation and the World Trade Organisation. ... Washington cannot veto Palestinian membership at separate UN organisations such as Unesco.  Although the Obama administration has been trying to find ways to avoid cutting off funding to Unesco, officials admit there will be little other option should members vote in favour of admitting the Palestinians.

The fanatical pandering by U.S. politicians to Israel's Zionist leaders was reflected by U.S. legislation to immediately cut off American funding for the Paris-based UN body if UNESCO accepted Palestine as a member. Submitting Americans to more terrorist attacks, Israel's proxies—U.S. politicians continue to shove their thumb into the face of Americans.

Preposterous pandering to Zionist leaders by U.S. politicians cutting off funding to a peace-promoting UN agency if an invaded and occupied people seek membership still did not raise any observable protest among the American people, despite the fact that this pandering was the initial and continuing reason for people in  other nations, outraged by what U.S. and Israeli politicians were doing to the Palestinians.

To loud applause, on October 31, 2011, Palestine was approved as a member of Unesco.

True to form, Israel's mouthpiece in the U.S. government, David T. Killion, US ambassador to UNESCO, told journalists after the vote: "The action today will complicate our ability to support UNESCO,"

And repeated the same phony line, "The US has been clear for the need of a two-state resolution, but the only path is through direct negotiations and there are no shortcuts, and initiatives like today are counterproductive." All knew that Israel's Zionist leaders would never negotiate away the permanent settlements built throughout Palestine. As Adolf Hitler reportedly stated, "Repeat a lie often enough and the people will believe it."

Video of the UN vote.

Another video:, where UNESCO’s Director-General Irina Bokova, said she fears the U.S. will now withdraw support from UNESCO. (English Statement starts at 2:39)  

107 member states voted in favor; 14 voted against, and 52 abstained. The United States, Canada, Germany and Holland voted against Palestinian membership. Brazil, Russia, China, India, South Africa and France voted in favor. Britain and Italy abstained.

More Links to Subversion of American Interests

More links at this site to the subversion of America by militant Israel leaders and subservient U.S. politicians:

Jewish Groups Supporting Palestine And
Opposing Militant Israeli Leaders

The following are a small sampling of the Jewish groups supporting the people of Palestine and Gaza:

Ostrich-Like Reaction by the U.S. Media:
Dumbed-Down American Public

Part of the problem with the failure of most Americans to react to the constant deceptions played upon them is the dumbing down practices of U.S. media personnel, and the culture of U.S. media corporations, something like the Murdoch scandals tat first erupted in Britain, but represented by Murdoch's U.S. media ownerships, including the New York Post, the Wall Street Journal, and other Murdoch holdings in the United States. Editorials in the Wall Street Journal have had a history of far-fetched arguments against Palestinians and supportive of Israel's brutality.


Ignorance may be bliss, but it comes at a horrendous price, as seen by the years of terrorist attacks against U.S. targets by those people harmed or outraged by the brutality ordered or enabled by U.S. political leaders in the Middle East. Americans have paid and will continue to pay a heavy price for their ignorance of these and other areas of misconduct and their failure to protest.


Good American people should be ashamed and outraged at what their political leaders are doing, in their name, to perpetrated one of the greatest national brutalities upon the people of another nation—made possible by subservient U.S. politicians selling their own country down the river for benefit, and causing a series of continuing terrorist attacks upon the United States by people outraged by what is being done to the Palestinians. At least the "terrorists" show outrage—while most Americans either don't make the effort to understand their corrupt leadership, or are too lazy to care.

Should Americans Care?

Should Americans care? Americans have already paid for the conduct by Israeli militant leaders and the pandering U.S. politicians in a series of never-ending and worsening terrorist attacks, brutal deaths, and many trillions in costs that have already changed the quality of life for many Americans, and the end is nowhere in sight.

Dumbing Down the American People
As the Nazi Did to the People in Germany—
With Similar Deadly Consequences

U.S. politicians and other shills for Israel's hardliners repeatedly made statements that required a dumbed-down American public for an audience. The Palestine issue is only one of many such instances. Focusing at this time on the Palestine issue:


The familiar line, "The United States Must Support Israel at the U.N. (Scandal-scarred Murdoch's Wall Street Journal of September 16, 2011), and stated: "...a alliance based on shared democratic principles, and common strategic interests."


The article ignored:

The slanted Wall Street Journal article continued: "The Palestinian leadership is intent on destroying the possibility of a negotiated settlement of the conflict with Israel in favor of unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state by the United Nations."

Continuing, the article stated: "The Palestinian plan to win that one-sided endorsement form the U.N. this month in New York threatens Israel and insults the United States. The U.S. and the U.N. have long supported the idea that Israel and its neighbors should make peace through direct negotiations"


A New York Times article (September 18, 2011) by Thomas L. Friedman, titled, "Israel: Adrift at Sea Alone," stated in part:

The most diplomatically inept and strategically incompetent government in Israel's history have put Israel in a very dangerous situation. This has also left the U.S. government fed up with Israel's leadership, but a hostage to its ineptitude, because the powerful pro-Israel lobby in an election season can force the administration to defend Israel at the U.N., even when it knows Israel is pursuing policies not in its own interest or America's.


... by mobilizing Republicans in Congress to box in Obama and by encouraging Jewish leaders to suggest that Obama is hostile to Israel and is losing the Jewish vote.

Another New York Times article (September 19, 2011) titled, "Palestinians Turn to U.N., Where Partition Began," stated in part:
The original two-state solution designed to establish separate countries for Jews and Arabs anticipated the day that both would seek United Nations membership. "When the independence of either the Arab or the Jewish State as envisaged in this plan has become effective," begins a paragraph deep in General Assembly Resolution 181 from November 1947, then "sympathetic consideration" should be give to the application."

The Palestinians see the membership application as a last-ditch attempt to preserve the two-state solution in the face of ever-encroaching Israeli settlements, as well as a desperate move to shake up the negotiations that they feel have achieved little after 20 years of American oversight.

The "question of Palestine" has bedeviled the United Nations like none other since it was founded, with the original partition plan followed by hundreds of resolutions from the General Assembly and the Security Council, most never enforced.

Palestinians ... position has gradually eroded over the past 20 years, when the United States began monopolizing the negotiations with the 1991 Madrid peace conference. They remain under occupation, the number of Jewish settlers has tripled to around 600,000, and they have far less freedom of movement in the territories ostensibly meant to become their state.


The Wall Street Journal, a literal mouthpiece for Israel and its powerful lobby in the United States, had an article (September 20, 2011) that appeared to reveal the reason for the delaying tactic. The article argued in part that Palestine's population does not comprise a single population, and does not exclusively control all of its territory (referring to the large number of Israel settlers colonizing the occupied territory by Israel's government and the presence of the invading Israel military!

The Palestine Authority, does not meet the basic characteristics of a state necessary for such recognition.... As of today, the PA has neither a permanent population [mixture of Arabs and Jews infiltrated by Israel] nor defined territory [resulting from Israel's invasion and occupation] The PA does not control any part of the West Bank to the exclusion of Israeli authority [due to invasion and occupation by Israel].

A simple question could be "What possible reason can United States politicians have for denying statehood to people of an occupied country?" It is another form of bribery by the powerful lobby group for the militant Israeli leaders!!

Self-Serving Conduct by U.S. Politicians Bodes
More Great Tragedies for America

Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, a Republican from Florida, the chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, proposed legislation coinciding with the Palestinian bid for statehood recognition at the United Nations. Among the provisions in that legislation: If passed, and even the consideration of such legislation, outrages people in the Middle East, enlarges on the people wanting to kill Americans (from earlier conduct by U.S. politicians), and further show other countries the legal stupidity, pandering, and irresponsibility taking over in the United States.

Sampling of history of misconduct and enabling tragedies by members of Congress. Its misconduct relating to the Palestinian situation is old hat!

Bald-Face Pandering by Politician
With Grave National Consequences

Compounding that Republican legislature were the conduct of other Republicans, including presidential nominee Rick Perry of Texas during an Israeli press conference (September 20, 2011), where he was publicly pandering to this powerful group whose influence on the actions of U.S. politicians have played key roles in the years of terrorist attacks upon the United States. Perry stated:

"As a Christian . . . I stand with Israel." He stated that his Christian faith required him to strongly support Israel's [invasion and brutal occupation and colonizing of Palestine and denial of statehood recognition].


"I also as a Christian have a clear directive [from God, like George W Bush frequently stated!!] so from my perspective it’s pretty easy. Both as an American and as a Christian, I am going to stand with Israel."


As Perry was talking he was surrounded by what he called “a diverse group of Jewish leaders from here and abroad,” He criticized President Obama’s approach to the Middle East, calling him “naive and arrogant, misguided and dangerous.”


The following were Perry's remarks made at the
Israel-Palestine Press conference in New York City:


Thank you. Let me begin by thanking Dr. Solomon Frager and Aron Hirtz for helping us organize this press conference today. I am joined today by a diverse group of Jewish leaders from here and abroad who share my concern that the United Nations could take action this week to legitimize the Palestinian gambit to establish statehood in violation of the spirit of the 1993 Oslo Accords.

We are indignant that certain Middle Eastern leaders have discarded the principle of direct negotiations [30 years of delays while Israel colonizes the invaded territory and then claims it is part of Israel] between the sovereign nation of Israel and the Palestinian leadership, and we are equally indignant that the Obama Administration’s Middle East policy of appeasement has encouraged such an ominous act of bad faith.

Simply put, we would not be here today at the precipice of such a dangerous move if the Obama Policy in the Middle East wasn’t naïve, arrogant, misguided and dangerous. It must be said, first, that Israel is our oldest and strongest democratic ally in the Middle East and has been for more than 60 years. The Obama Policy of moral equivalency, which gives equal standing to the grievances of Israelis and Palestinians, including the orchestrators of terrorism, is a dangerous insult. [Democratic? How can a country invading another and subjecting its people to humiliation and murders and throwing out Arab people be called democratic!]

There is no middle ground between our allies and those who seek their destruction. America should not be ambivalent between the terrorist tactics of Hamas and the security tactics of the legitimate and free state of Israel. By proposing ‘indirect talks” through the U.S. rather than between Palestinian leaders and Israel, this administration encouraged the Palestinians to shun direct talks. [Direct talks were a blind ally while Israel continued to colonize the invaded land with permanent settlements.]


Second, it was wrong for this Administration to suggest the 1967 borders should be the starting point for Israeli-Palestinian negotiations.

When you consider this suggestion was made on the eve of the Israeli Prime Minister’s visit, we see in this American Administration a willingness to isolate a close ally and to do so in a manner that is insulting and naïve. [Perry approved Israel's annexation of invaded land.]

Third, by injecting the issue of 1967 borders in addition to a construction freeze in East Jerusalem and Israeli settlements, the Obama Administration has put Israel in a position of weakness and taken away their flexibility to offer concessions as part of the negotiation process. [Perry again supported Israel's building of permanent settlements in the invaded and occupied land.]

Indeed, bolstered by the Obama Administration’s policies and apologists at the U.N., the Palestinians are exploiting the instability in the Middle East hoping to achieve their objective without concessions or direct negotiations with Israel. [Palestinians, in desperation after 20 years of fruitless talks, watching Israel colonize the land, had no other choice.]

The reason is simple: if they perceive they can get what they want from the U.N. without making any concessions why should they negotiate with Israel? [Concessions to an invading and occupying enemy!]


While the administration is right to finally agree to fight the Arab resolution at the U.N., it bears repeating that we wouldn’t be here today if they had stuck to some basic principles concerning Palestinian statehood:

First, Palestinian leaders must publicly affirm Israel’s right to exist, and to exist as a Jewish state; [Palestinian Authority did not object to Israel's existence.]

Second, President Abbas must persuade all factions including Hamas to renounce acts of terrorism and release kidnapped Israeli Gilad Shalit, and; [Israel has over 1,000 Arabs in prison, many being women and children, and most never charged or convicted of any offense.]

Third, Palestinian statehood must be established only through direct negotiations between the Palestinian leadership and the nation of Israel. [After 20 years of Israel blocking and colonizing Palestine land!]

By not insisting on these principles, the Obama Administration has appeased the Arab Street at the expense of our own national security interests. They have sowed instability that threatens the prospects of peace.

Israel’s security is critical to America’s security. We must not forget it was Israel that took out the nuclear capabilities of Iraq in 1981 and Syria in 2007. In both instances, their actions made the free world safer. [Political pandering to Israel was the initial and primary reason for hatred that spurned repeated terrorist attacks.]


Today, the greatest threat to the security of Israel and, by extension, a threat to America, is the Iranian government developing a nuclear arsenal. One thing is clear: we must stop Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. Economic sanctions must be tightened and increased and all options must remain on the table to stop a brutally repressive regime from acquiring a nuclear capability. [Seeking to start still another war, as if Afghanistan and Iraq weren't deadly enough for Americans.]


To date, we have fumbled our greatest opportunity for regime change. As average Iranian citizens were marching on Tehran in the Green Revolution in 2009, America was wasting precious time on a naïve policy of outreach to both the Iranian and Syrian governments.


Who knows what the leadership of Iran would look like today if America had done everything in its power to provide diplomatic and moral support to encourage the growing movement of dissidents who sought freedom.


Our actions in recent years have destabilized the Middle East. We have been complacent in encouraging revolt against hostile governments in Iran and Syria and we have been slow to recognize the risks posed by the new regime in Egypt and the increasingly strained relationship between Israel and Turkey. [Absolutely true, but not as Perry insinuated. U.S. politicians aided and abetted Israel's invasion and brutal treatment of Palestinians.]


It is vitally important for America to preserve alliances with moderate Muslim regimes and Muslim leaders who seek to preserve peace and stability in the region. But today, neither adversaries nor allies alike, know where America stands. [Muslim countries have grown to hate Americans due to actions of U.S. politicians.]


Our muddle of a foreign policy has created greater uncertainty in the midst of the “Arab Spring.” And our policy of isolating and undermining Israel has only encouraged our adversaries in their aggression.


With the end-run on Palestinian statehood imminent before the U.N., America must act swiftly.


First, every nation within the U.N. must know America stands with Israel and the Oslo accord principle of direct negotiations without equivocation.


Second, America must make it clear that a declaration of Palestinian Statehood in violation of the spirit of the Oslo accords could jeopardize our funding of U.N. operations. [The Oslo accords did not envision years of obfuscation and colonizing by Israel.]


Third, the Palestinians must know their gambit comes with consequences in particular that America will have to reconsider the $4 billion in assistance we have provided to the Palestinians over the last 17 years. [Recipe for even more hatred of Americans.]


Fourth, we should close the PLO office in Washington if the U.N. grants the standing of a Palestinian state.

And fifth, we must signal to the world, including nations like Turkey and Egypt whom we have considered allies in recent years, that we won’t tolerate aggression against Israel. [Others countries are not ignorant of the actions taken by U.S. politicians. Several have already stated that they would sever the friendly relations they had with the U.S. if the U.S. opposes UN statehood recognition for Palestine.]


Israel is our friend and ally. I have traveled there several times, and met with its leaders. It is not a perfect nation, but its existence is critical to America’s security in the world. [Friend and ally? Espionage against the United States; the primary blame for decades of terrorist attacks upon U.S. targets!]


It is time to change our policy of appeasement toward the Palestinians to strengthen our ties to the nation of Israel, and in the process establish a robust American position in the Middle East characterized by a new firmness and a new resolve. [Policy of appeasement to Palestinians; either he is on drugs or his pandering to Israel is pathologically obsessive.]


If America does not head off the aggression of forces hostile to Israel we will only embolden them.

Additional Comments


Pictures taken in Jerusalem in 1953 by this writer while an airline captain flying Muslim pilgrims from throughout the Middle East to the holy cities of Mecca and Medina.

Information Sent to This Writer

The main person behind this site is former international airline captain Rodney Stich. He spent time in the Middle East during the 1950s living with the people as he flew Muslim pilgrims (Hajji) from throughout the area to the holy cities of Mecca and Medina. The following are a sampling of relatively recent emails sent to him by people living in the Middle East:

From Mazin Qumsiyeh, May 21, 2011.

From Mazin Qumsiyeh, May 19, 2011, commenting on President Barack Obama's speech declaring need to recognize the 1967 borders between Israel and Palestine.

Article by Henry Siiegman, May 13, 2011, Fatah-Hamas Deal Calls Israel's Bluff.

Stephen Lendman article dated February 2010.

Video and Information Relating to the Freedom Protesters (excellent in superimposing images from the US civil rights movement to the current era) (Filmed by ISMers in 4 parts). (from Ann Paq of Active stills) (collage of
videos from Jewish Voices for Peace). 1 of four videos from an
ISM activist).

More stories and commentary on the Freedom Rides

Take Action: Global March to Jerusalem (video)

Positive action example: Cambridge: Boycott Sabra & Tribe!>

Our friend and colleague Ashraf AbuRahma, a real believer in nonviolent demonstrations and who never threw a stone is charged with throwing stones. This case has other twists. Amira Haas tellxs of "The banality of a Palestinian's arrest"

Moshe Dayan's Widow Ruth: Zionist Dream Has Run Its Course: These startlingwords were uttered last week in Tel Aviv by 95-year-old Ruth Dayan, widow ofone of Israel's founding fathers

Occupy the Occupiers: A Jewish Call to Action

Ran Greenstein: How to fight the Israel-Apartheid analogy in four easy steps a guide for useful Hasbara idiots.

Occupy Tahrir Square vs. Occupy America: “We could all temporarily losesight of who is pulling the strings in this counter-revolution currently playing out in Egypt … but make no mistake, the thousands in Tahrir square will not lose hope nor can they afford to.” Dr. Ashraf Ezzat

Petition: To Congress & President Obama to stop military aid to Israel: (this is an old petition that was never publicized but it might be worthwhile to reinvigorate now) Petition : "Right of Return and one secular democratic state"

International Atomic Energy Agency exposed as Israeli spy front:

More Information on Harm to Americans from Coalition of
Israel's Zionist Leaders and Their American Puppets
In Congress, the White House, and U.S. Media

U.S. investing in Israel bonds, financing illegal and brutal occupier of Palestine land. No where but in the United States could such outrageand stupidityoccur:

U.S. military leaders response to supporting Israel's war with Iran.

Israeli illegal settlers attacking Palestinians.

Sampling of harm to Americans as Israel Zionist puppets—members of U.S. Congress—carry out their self-serving pandering:

Gaza, the good and the bad:

Joint Players with CIA Personnel in
Crimes Against the United States

Israel has been secret partners with the CIA for years, undermining U.S. interests. For instance:

The conniving Israeli Zionist leaders are too cunning for the simplistic U.S. political leaders, and this fact is blatantly clear in the manipulation of America in the Palestine crisis.

Setting the American, people up for even more catastrophic consequences, U.S. politicians authorized the shipment to Israel of huge bombs capable of penetrating deeply-embedded facilities, making possible Israel's militant Zionist attacks upon Iran, with consequences for the American people beyond comprehension.,

Americans Continue to Also Suffer
The Consequences of Zionist Brutalities

If the facts are understood, the American people will have the more graphic example of how U.S. politicians and leaders have engaged in lying so as to pander to the militant Zionist element of the nation of Israel, and with enough understanding will recognize how this deep-seated American culture has so outraged people in other countries that they have engaged in years of terrorist attacks upon the United States, making possible such great American disasters as the 9/11 attacks. And this culture, if sufficient energy is exerted by people with normal intelligence, will understand permeates throughout government offices and has inflicted, or enable to be inflicted, greet harm to a formerly prosperous and great nation, and reduced it to a shell of what it could otherwise have been.

The pandering of U.S. politicians to Israel's brutal invasion and occupation brought forth a series of continuing terrorist attacks, the end of which is nowhere in sight.

The pandering of U.S. politicians in domestic affairs has a continuing series of blowback effects in the housing field; in the financial sectors; in the credit card field; in the medical field; and countless others.

The American public never learns!

This Writer's Credibility

This writer, a former federal agent and head of a coalition of former government agents and other insiders, has been providing insider information on high-level corruption and series of resulting tragedies to the public since 1978 through books and hundreds of radio-TV experiences. Making these criminal and tragic events possible have been the bribe-taking and pandering members of Congress. This writer lived in the Middle East, including Jerusalem and Ramallah, in the early 1950s, as an airline captain flying Muslim pilgrims from throughout the Middle East to the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, the hajj. In those days, people throughout the Middle East, including Iran, and we Americans were warmly welcomed. The pandering actions of U.S. politicians changed that, and the American public has suffered repeated catastrophic attacks as a direct result of their own politicians.


Now, this site puts sufficient information together to where anyone willing to exert minimum effort can understand the lies, the hoaxes, upon the American people as it relates to the militant Zionist rulers of Israel, the endless numbers of brutalities upon the Palestinians, and the easily recognizable blowback consequences. These consequences include the series of attacks upon U.S. targets, including 9/11, by people neighbors of the Palestinians that have been outraged by the joint actions of the brutal Israeli leaders and the enabling pandering U.S. politicians. 


If the series of deadly attacks resulting from the subverting actions of U.S. politicians hasn't motivated you to get informed and outraged, the though of worsening attacks might motivate you.


Credibility of This Writer

Much of this information and evidence is based upon information that this writer and his group of other former federal agents and insiders discovered. He was a U.S. Navy Patrol Plane Commander, an international airline captain, flying throughout the Middle East, federal airline safety inspector, and an activist against corruption in government.

Revealing Response by U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron White

In August of 1991, he submitted to U.S. Supreme Court Justice Byron R. White an emergency petition addressing the criminal activities that he and a group of other former federal agents had discovered. If the petition had been acted upon, a series of Pandora boxes would have been revealed showing complicity of large segments of government.

In response to that petition, an unprecedented personal letter (Oct. 28, 1991) from Justice Byron R. White “apologized” for not being able to provide relief requested in that emergency petition. 

 Dear Mr. Stich,

As a single Justice, I can be of no help to you. I am returning your petition.


Justice Byron White

The significance of that letter, by a Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, to an emergency petition reporting officially discovered criminality related to a series of prior catastrophic events, was unprecedented. A Supreme Court Justice does not apologize because other Justices do not assist.  Something serious was reflected by his highly unusual response.

Actions That Concerned American Must Take
To Resolve These Outrages

The conduct by Israel's Zionist politicians, that breed such hatred for Americans, can only occur with the support and  complicity of U.S. politicians, aided by most U.S. media personnel. These politicians are either afraid of being voted out of office by Israel lobbies funding opposing politicians, or are supportive of Israel's practices so as to receive political funding (bribes). A major change can be brought about by groups in each respective states mounting a continuing effort to change their politicians position on supporting Israel.

The intensity of these actions should be based not only upon the atrocities inflicted upon the Palestinians, but also upon the harm resulting to the United States from people in other countries that have to rely upon terrorism to address the wrongs inflicted upon them.

More information on Israel can be found at

Documented Books on History of Corruption By
Controlling U.S. Bureaucrats and Politicians









All of the books are available at, in print and on the Kindle, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich

Sampling of early books reviews

Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.

Return to



Viagra online available in various online pharmacies can be adopted to get back the normal sexual health once more at any age. Generic cialis is also a drug which is highly adopted for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. This drug unlike any online pharmacy other similar drug does not affect blood pressure of the patient under any circumstances and thus highly appreciated.