Felonious Purpose of Unlawful
Halting Access to the Courts
Starting in 1986, federal judges issued over a half dozen orders barring former federal agent Rodney Stich from filing any papers in many federal district or appellate courts. These unlawful and unconstitutional orders barring Rodney Stich and his group of government whistleblowers from reporting serious criminal activities that they uncovered as part of their official duties. These criminal activities included, for instance, CIA drug smuggling, judicial corruption in the bankruptcy courts, and other crimes described in his informational books.
The action, and the intent, of these orders was to:
For the people, these corrupt, illegal, and unconstitutional orders resulted in ma continuation of the tragic consequences.
Federal judges violated the law that requires four matters to exist before an injunction can be issued against a person. These include:
(1) they must halt great and irreparable harm;
(2) they must halt unlawful acts;
(3) they must be in the public’s interest; and
(4) the judge rendering the orders must issue a finding of facts showing that these requirements had been met.
Federal judges applied these requirements in reverse, another indication of the utter contempt for the law by the mindset in the federal judiciary.
No law permits issuing a permanent injunction, especially when it voids for anyone the rights and protections guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States.
Another tactic used by federal judges was to issue permanent injunctions barring Stich for the remainder of his life from filing any papers in the federal courts, which were obviously unlawful and unconstitutional.
The intent and the effect of the permanent injunctions was to block the reporting of criminal activities which Stich and his group of government whistleblowers had sought to do. The requirement to make such reports to a federal judge is clearly stated in the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4. That statute states:
Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). "Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both."
The other reason for rendering the injunctive orders was to void for Stich the protection in federal law against the massive violations occurring in sham lawsuits filed by CIA-related law firms.
When Stich sought to report additional criminal activities that he subsequently learned from the increasing numbers of other government agents, federal judges and Justice Department prosecutors charged Stich with criminal contempt of court.
A void injunctive order cannot serve as the basis for contempt:
A void order cannot support a contempt charge. An order denying a person equal protection of the law cannot support contempt. Johnson v. Virginia, 373 US 61, 83 S Ct 1053, 10 L Ed 2d 195. The injunctive order violated important due process protections guaranteed to all citizens by the laws and Constitution of the United States.
n Re Burrus, 136 US 586, 10 S Ct 850, 34 L Ed 500, the Supreme Court held that if the command is in whole or in part beyond the power of the court, the writ, or so much as is in excess of jurisdiction, that it is void; and the court cannot punish for any contempt of its unauthorized requirements. Re Rowland, 104 US 604, 26 L Ed 861; the Court has no power to punish for contempt the violation of an injunction which it had no jurisdiction to grant. Worden v. Searls, 121 US 14, 7 S Ct 814, 30 L Ed 853; orders enjoining a party from suing are void. Re Ayers, 123 US 443, 8 S Ct 104, 31 L Ed 216. Making this worse, he was suffering great and irreparable harm from record numbers of violations of federally protected rights.
The injunctive orders:
Obstructed justice by requiring Stich and his group of government whistleblowers to cover up for criminal activities. The judges violated numerous criminal statutes, including Title18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 3, 4
Retaliating against Stich, a former federal agent and witness, was a felony under Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 1505, 1510, 1512, 1513.
Retaliating against a person for exercising due process rights. These are criminal acts under Title 18 U.S.C. § 241.
The federal crime reporting statute constitutes one of the most valuable tools to fight corruption in government that is covered up by other government officials. It is understandable why corrupt people in government offices would not want that statute used.
Deadly Consequences of Judicial
In One of Multiple Sectors
All forms of human tragedies have been inflicted upon the people of the United States from the corruption discovered by the people behind this site−and made possible by enablers in and out of government. The below pictures are only a sampling of the consequences from the documented corruption that are able to be portrayed graphically. The tragedies in other areas resulting from the corruption, cover-ups, and public indifference, are not shown here.
United Airlines crash into New York City, the world's worst at that time. Withheld from the Amererica public were the reports by federal safety inspectors-investigators showing a continuing pattern of corruption, fraud, criminal alteration of major government required records−and the standard abuse of those few inspectors attempting to require the airline management to comply with industry standards and clear requirements of federal aviation safety requirements−and FAA management to require compliance. None of the guilty, the enablers, to these and the continuing fraud-related crashes ever were held accountable for the hundreds of deaths that they enabled to occur.
These few examples of the horrors associated with airline disasters enabled to occur by documented corruption withheld from the American people. The standard culture of cover-ups in the United States enabled the corruption, cover-ups, to mutate into different areas. In the aviation area, although the continuing series of airline disasters eventually came to a halt for other reasons, the culture continued, and enabled to occur a number of easily preventable airline disasters. The inbred culture created the conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to easily hijack four airliners within a few hours of each other and kill nearly 3,000 people.
In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences.
Email address for
the author and activist against corruption in
For more information relating to the author and his activities put "Rodney Stich" into a search engine such as Google or yahoo.com. The links run into many tens of thousands.
To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link:
Hot cell phone and service deal from amazon.com, with 30-day return if not satisfied.
Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts.