U.S. human rights violations against former government agent--and the consequences.

<body> Record Setting Human Rights Violations By Powerful Bloc In the Federal Government This is one example of the classic form of human rights in the United States under the leadership now existing in powerful government offices. It also shows the classic consequences suffered by the American people from this culture. Understanding the basic beginning will help to how why the grotesque human rights violations were inflicted upon a lone former federal agent simply trying to halt the brutal and deadly consequences of the corruption. Over a dozen federal judges, and all Supreme Court Justices, were involved in the following actions against a former federal agent and whistleblower to halt his exposure of corruption of people in key government positions. He was attempting to halt the harm, some of it catastrophic, resulting from major corruption that he, a former federal agent, and his coalition of former professionals, intelligence, law enforcement, and aviation safety personnel, initially discovered during their years of official duties. As the participants in the corruption expanded to Department of Justice officials and to federal judges through their prior cover-ups, these judges and Department of Justice employees then misused raw federal power to silence him, which required major civil and constitutional violations, criminal violations, and gross human rights violations. Prior to the start of the endless series of major retaliatory actions to halt the exposure of corruption involving people in control of key government operations, federal judges repeatedly blocked the reports of this corruption that the former federal agent sought to report, and halt, by filing federal actions under the federal crime reporting statute to circumvent blocks elsewhere and force the presentation of evidence into a judicial record. This attempt was repeatedly blocked by federal, who went beyond simply obstructing justice by issuing unlawful and unconstitutional orders permanently voiding for him the right to file any papers in any federal district or appellate court. The obstruction of justice blocking actions by federal judges commenced in 1979 and continue to this date. From 1982, a hoard of lawyers filed a continuing series of sham lawsuits against the former federal agent, and the sequence of events indicates that these were parallel efforts to the judicial block to halt attempts to expose the corruption. The involvement and complicity of large numbers of California eventually showed that the multiple actions taken were joint efforts and apparently orchestrated by a powerful group high in the federal government, and probably within the U.S. Department of Justice. The Brutal Attacks on Patriotic Whistleblower Federal judges and Department of Justice officials charged the former federal agent with criminal contempt of court for filing a lawsuit in federal courts at Sacramento, California, which sought to report corrupt activities involved in aviation disasters and exercising federal defenses for a series of major civil and constitutional violations that were parallel efforts by lawyers to halt his exposure of high-level corruption, paralleling the efforts of federal judges (John Moulds, Schwartz, Levi, and others, plus the entire ninth Circuit Court of Appeals were implicated.) The criminal contempt of court charge constituted a crime under the obstruction of justice statutes; constituted a crime through retaliating against a former federal agent and whistleblower for trying to report major federal crimes involving people 8incontrol of key government officials. Federal judges violated the constitutional right to a jury trial and subjected the former federal agent to a Kangaroo Court trial. He was being tried, prosecuted, and judged by Department of Justice personnel and federal judges that had either committed some of the corrupt actions or covered up for them, thereby protecting themselves by their conduct against the former federal agent. They then ordered the former federal agent sent to federal prison for six months, under the harshest possible conditions, and including eight weeks in solitary confinement, considered a form of torture. He was 69 years of age when that crime was inflicted upon him, and while he was recovering from quadruple open heart surgery. While in prison, federal judges and Department of Justice personnel corruptly seized and liquidated the $10 million in assets that funded his attempts to report the corruption and halt the many serious consequences of the corruption. The seizure occurred without the constitutional due process requirement of a notice of hearing; a hearing; and legally required cause. Under decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, all of those assets can be ordered returned to him, an impossibility with the huge numbers of federal judges complicit in these schemes that would have especially dire consequences on September 11, 2001. When Stich exercised his legal and constitutional due process rights to file an objection to the seizure and liquidation, Oakland federal judge Edward Jellen charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for exercising the statutory, case law, and constitutional right to file objection to the illegal and unconstitutional seizure. Later, other federal judges in San Francisco, Marilyn Patel and Vaughn Walker, charged the 67-year-old former federal agent and whistleblower with criminal contempt of court for having filed an attempted to report the criminal activities to a federal court in New York City, and subjected him to six months house arrest (before suddenly dropping charges. Prior to that, Stich was a respected business entrepreneur with large real estate holdings, that funded his efforts to halt the terrible consequences of the corruption in America's leadership, and which were corruptly taken from him in an effort to silence him. The public that he was making such efforts to help showed no interest in what was done to him. Life in America!!. Years of Continuous Major Human Rights Violations By Hoard of Powerful People in U.S. Government Over a dozen federal judges, and all Supreme Court Justices, were involved in the following actions against a former federal agent and whistleblower. He was attempting to halt the harm, the deaths, and the catastrophic events resulting from major corruption that he, a former federal agent, and his coalition of former professionals, intelligence, law enforcement, and aviation safety personnel, initially discovered during their official duties. As the participants in the corruption expended to Department of Justice officials and to federal judges through their prior cover-ups, these judges and Department of Justice employees then misused raw federal power to silence him, which required major civil and constitutional violations, criminal violations, and gross human rights violations. Prior to the start of the endless series of major retaliatory actions to halt the exposure of corruption involving people in control of key government operations, federal judges repeatedly blocked the reports of this corruption that the former federal agent sought to report, ,and halt, by filing federal actions under the federal crime reporting statute to circumvent blocks elsewhere and force the presentation of evidence into a judicial record. This attempt was repeatedly blocked by federal, who went beyond simply obstructing justice by issuing unlawful and unconstitutional orders permanently voiding for him the right to file any papers in any federal district or appellate court. The obstruction of justice blocking actions by federal judges commenced in 1979 and continued to this date. From 1982, a hoard of lawyers filed a continuing series of sham lawsuits against the former federal agent, and the sequence of events indicates that these were parallel efforts to the judicial block to halt attempts to expose the corruption. The involvement and complicity of large numbers of California eventually showed that the multiple actions taken were joint efforts and apparently orchestrated by a powerful group high in the federal government, and probably within the U.S. Department of Justice. It took a powerful force to commit the gross and repeated violations of major state and federal laws and constitutional protections, and to require state and federal judges responsible for stopping such gross violations to join the attacks upon the whistleblower. The additional violations of criminal statutes from the obstruction of justice crimes, and retaliation against a former federal agent and whistleblower trying to report major crimes against the United States that already had profound deadly consequences, required protection from the U.S. Department of Justice. Those orders knowingly prevented him from reporting, as legally required—and permitted and expected of any responsible citizen—to repot the criminal activities that had been and was continuing to result in enormous harm throughout the United States. Them unlawful judicial orders also prevented him from exercising federal defense remedies against the gross personal and financial harms being inflicted by a hoard of attorneys and California judges that constituted federal causes of actions. These attacks were parallel efforts to the judicial block to halt the reporting of the ongoing corruption high in the federal government. The Cover-Up of Corruption Went Out of Control And Now Could Force Key People Out of U.S. Government The whistleblower, motivated by the horrific consequences of the corruption in the aviation environment and national security, and learning of addition major criminal activities from his expanding coalition of former government agents, again exercised his responsibilities to report the added evidence to a federal judges. Department of Justice personnel and federal judges—who by now through their prior criminal cover-ups—retaliated by criminally misusing their government powers. The overwhelming amount of documented evidence revealed a power force in government orchestrating the multiple parallel schemes and protecting the perpetrators. Powerful Force Orchestrating the Attacks, Suspension Of All Legal Defenses, and Protecting the Perpetrators It took a powerful force high in the federal government to commit the gross and repeated violations of major state and federal laws and constitutional protections, and to require state and federal judges responsible for stopping such gross violations to join the attacks upon the whistleblower. The federal judges and Justice Department employees' block to reporting the corruption were criminal acts under the obstruction of justice statutes. The harm inflicted by federal judges and Department of Justice employees were criminal acts under the statutes pertaining of inflicting harm upon a former federal agent or anyone reporting a federal crime Those orders knowingly prevented him from reporting the federal crimes as legally required—and permitted and expected of any responsible citizen. The crimes became worse because the crimes caused the corruption to continue along with the continuing consequences, some of which were repeatedly catastrophic in which horrific consequences followed. The unlawful judicial orders also prevented him from exercising federal defense remedies against the gross personal and financial harms being inflicted by a hoard of attorneys and California judges that constituted federal causes of actions. These attacks were parallel efforts to the judicial block to halt the reporting of the ongoing corruption high in the federal government. These attacks met the legal definition of a conspiracy, and constituted additional crimes. See conspiracy indications. The Cover-Up of Corruption Went Out of Control And Now Reveals a Greatly Enlarged Egyptian Type of Corrupt Government Leadership in Need for Removal The whistleblower, motivated by the horrific consequences of the corruption in the aviation environment and national security, and learning of addition major criminal activities from his expanding coalition of former government agents, again exercised his responsibilities to report the added evidence to a federal judges. Department of Justice personnel and federal judges—who by now through their prior criminal cover-ups—retaliated by criminally misusing their government powers: Federal judges and Department of Justice officials charged the former federal agent with criminal contempt of court for filing a lawsuit in federal courts at Sacramento, California, which sought to report corrupt activities involved in aviation disasters and exercising federal defenses for a series of major civil and constitutional violations that were parallel efforts by lawyers to halt his exposure of high-level corruption, paralleling the efforts of federal judges (John Moulds, Schwartz, Levi, and others, plus the entire ninth Circuit Court of Appeals were implicated.) The criminal contempt of court charge constituted a crime under the obstruction of justice statutes; constituted a crime through retaliating against a former federal agent and whistleblower for trying to report major federal crimes involving people 8incontrol of key government officials. Federal judges violated the constitutional right to a jury trial and subjected the former federal agent to a Kangaroo Court trial. He was being tried, prosecuted, and judged by Department of Justice personnel and federal judges that had either committed some of the corrupt actions or covered up for them, thereby protecting themselves by their conduct against the former federal agent. They then ordered the former federal agent sent to federal prison for six months, under the harshest possible conditions, and including eight weeks in solitary confinement, considered a form of torture. He was 69 years of age when that crime was inflicted upon him, and while he was recovering from quadruple open heart surgery. While in prison, federal judges and Department of Justice personnel corruptly seized and liquidated the $10 million in assets that funded his attempts to report the corruption and halt the many serious consequences of the corruption. The seizure occurred without the constitutional due process requirement of a notice of hearing; a hearing; and legally required cause. Under decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, all of those assets can be ordered returned to him, an impossibility with the huge numbers of federal judges complicit in these schemes that would have especially dire consequences on September 11, 2001. When Stich exercised his legal and constitutional due process rights to file an objection to the seizure and liquidation, Oakland federal judge Edward Jellen charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for exercising the statutory, case law, and constitutional right to file objection to the illegal and unconstitutional seizure. Later, other federal judges in San Francisco, Marilyn Patel and Vaughn Walker, charged the 67-year-old former federal agent and whistleblower with criminal contempt of court for having filed an attempted to report the criminal activities to a federal court in New York City, and subjected him to six months house arrest (before suddenly dropping charges. Sampling of Other Courageous People Targeted By Powerful Forces in the U.S. Government To Silence Them Fallen heroes. Coalition of other former government agents and whistleblowers. Consequences Suffered by Uninformed American Public Non-violent but tragic type of harm resulting from misconduct of people in control of key government positions. Traumatic type of consequences enabled by that same culture in the U.S. government. These resulting tragedies will, as in the past, become worse with time. Chances of American public now taking the required action to oust the corrupt people in key government positions: almost none! Even though the former federal agent was acting to protect them, not a single one of the thousands who knew of the attacks upon him made the slightest effort to help. The courage of the Egyptian protesters that brought about the removal of their nation's leaders for human rights violations show no sign of existence among the American public. Documentary Books On Crimes in Government Documentary books on years of corruption by U.S. leaders and the harm suffered by docile Americans. See also: Record-setting human rights violations in United States Human rights outrages in United States by its leaders. Return to www.defraudingamerica.com </body>