Entry of Guerrini Law Firm in
Latest Legal Obstruction of Justice TacticsThe entry of John Guerrini, lawyer from Pasadena, California, is the latest in a
series of legal tactics that obstruct justice by seeking to halt the exposure of criminal activities in certain government offices, a scheme that was stated by a CIA-front law firm in 1982 and continued without interruption into the 21st Century. During this time, the consequences from the continuing corruption―and the obstruction of justice tactics―has enabled to occur numerous catastrophic consequences for the United States and its people. The hijackings of four airliners on 9/11 were one of the continuing consequences from the corruption centered in the government's aviation safety offices.
Legal Filings Relating to Seizure of Expose Books
Papers filed by Guerrini on January 9, 2007, to obtain a California order seizing or
halting the distribution of the books exposing vast areas of corruption in government offices, including judges that must rule on the order. (Adobe PDF)
Objection filed by Stich on January 29, 2007, to the seizure, for hearing on February 15, 2007. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
On February 15, 2007, California judge Diana Smith (Martinez) issued an order authorizing the seizure of any money obtained from the sale of the books, which would then remove the funds to continue their availability. (Case number MSC01-05094.)
It is possible that the public will be forever deprived of the information that many former government agents provided that could have prevented some of the past national disasters and will insure that the conditions remain in place for more of the same.
What if:
The corruption in the government's aviation safety offices (FAA) (NTSB) really
exists, and if the corruption really did make possible a series of airline disasters, including the hijackings of 9/11 that were the responsibility of these same government safety offices to prevent, are true, or any part of the charges are true?
What air disasters can be expected to continue to occur, and what other national disasters can be expected to result from the criminal activities in other government offices?
Would the obstruction of justice tactics by lawyers and judges have played a role in the prior disasters--including 9/11--and those disasters yet to occur?
Are the Lawyers Complicit in 3000 Deaths?
Consider the following:
Without addressing the other areas affected by the criminal activities that Stich and his group of former government agents sought to report, and addressing only the corruption that affected the aviation environment:
IF the culture and corruption within the FAA did in fact exist (as overwhelming documentation shows), which included a history of blocking the implementation of procedures addressing the known safety problems, such as hijackings);
It would explain why the known and obviously long overdue measures to prevent the hijackings of the four airliners on 9/11 were not taken;
And the preventative measures to prevent airline hijackings did exist (and Stich made such recommendations);
And the need for such preventative measures was obvious from years of airline hijackings, plus the knowledge that airline hijackings were planned by Middle East terrorists);
And if lawyers did engage in legal actions knowing that they were blocking his reports, and most probably, intended to block the reports;
It becomes obvious that the long overdue preventatives measures were blocked by the legal tactics which constituted criminal obstruction of justice;
It then becomes obvious that if a citizen had perpetrated a minute fraction of these offenses that he would be criminally prosecuted for complicity in events that led to the 9/11 hijackings and 3,000 deaths.
If these lawyers are guilty of any complicity in these events, we also have the complicity of the dozens of members of Congress who knew not only about the underlying criminal activities, but also the criminal obstruction of justice and criminal retaliation against the former federal agent. And the others, in the media and elsewhere, who also knew! Talk about the ugly Americans, what about the criminal Americans!
The next question: What are you going to do about this blatant criminal and even subversive conduct by dozens of lawyers?