Half Century of DOJ
Corruption and Consequences

The great personal and financial upon individual Americans and their families, the many deaths, the easily accomplished major terrorist attacks, can be easily traced to the hardcore misconduct by the culture and the people in control of the political FBI and other Department of Justice offices. But it requires some mental exertion upon the part of anyone who wishes to know the truth.

• Covering up for advance information about planned terrorist attacks that was obtained from a top al Qaeda cell, so as to prevent exposure of a series of murders perpetrated by FBI agents and the cover-up of such crimes by high-level FBI-DOJ personnel. Nearly 4,000 people subsequently died in the forewarned terrorist attacks.
   

• Pattern of FBI agents involved in murders of American citizens, and the cover-ups by high-level FBI-DOJ personnel.
   

• Index of enablers that made possible the successes of 19 terrorists on September 11, 2001.
   

• The comparison of blame between different groups for the success of the 19 terrorists on September 11, 2001.
   

• Index of FBI-DOJ conduct recorded during the past 50 years.
   

• Retaliating against FBI agent seeking to expose the murders perpetr5ated by his boss, ,and CIA-related crimes involving the secret funding and arming of Iraq during the 1980s, the Reagan-Bush administrations.
   

• In obstruction of justice tactics, filed sham criminal charges against present and former government agents to discredit their reports of high-level corruption and to prevent the public from learning about the Trojan Horse criminal activities.
   

• Sampling of misconduct by FBI personnel, initially reported 40 years earlier by former federal air safety agent Rodney Stich, as he accused FBI director J. Edgar Hoover, in writing, while an FAA inspector, of criminal cover-up.

• Another link to culture of corruption of those people in control of the U.S. Department of Justice.

• The culture of filing false charges against American citizens, resulting in long or even life-long prison sentences, that enhances the standard and the income of federal prosecutors.
   

• The culture of seizing assets of innocent people, never charges, or found innocent.
   

• The culture of DOJ trustees in the nation’s bankruptcy courts that aid and abet the corrupt seizure of assets of people and corporations that exercise the statutory protection of Chapter 11.
   

• Turning the highest law enforcement agent of the U.S. government into a criminal racketeering enterprise (RICO) and in conspiracies to obstruct justice.
   

• Incompetence. Examples being the FBI agents who spied for the Soviet Union, with the evidence obvious to any of the agents’ neighbors. Examples includes Robert Hanssen, Richard Miller, Earl Edwin Pitts, among others.

All of these matters are described in great detail in such books as:

• Crimes of the FBI-DOJ, and the Mafia.

• History of Aviation Disasters: 1950 to 9/11.

• Defrauding America: Encyclopedia of Secret Operations by the CIA, DEA, and Other Government Offices.

The Lonely David vs. Goliath Battle Against
DOJ and Other Areas of Deadly Corruption

Former federal agent Rodney Stich had experienced and documented a half century of obstruction of justice cover-ups and retaliatory tactics, and the serious resulting harm to the American people and to national security. Each of these acts were felonies−crimes against the United States−under various federal criminal statutes, including obstruction of justice.

• From 1966 to the present date, starting while Stich was a key federal aviation safety inspector, personnel in the various Department of Justice offices have repeatedly blocked him from reporting the corruption related to a series of aviation disasters and of criminal activities in other areas, that he and his coalition of government agents and insiders had discovered during their official duties.
   

• Blocked Stich from making reports of these crimes via judicial reports made under the requirements of the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4.
   

• In 1986, federal prosecutors in Sacramento, California, charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for attempting to report the ongoing corruption in the government's aviation safety offices and the criminal activities in other areas. Each of those areas played an enabling role in ma continuing series of national disasters, including the hijackings of four airliners on September 11, 2001, and other terrorist attacks.
   

• Corruptly seized and liquidated the $10 million in assets that Stich used to fund his attempts to publicize and force a halt to the corrupt activities in high-level overt and covert government positions.
   

• Record-setting harm inflicted upon former federal agent and whistleblower to halt his exposure of corruption in key U.S. government offices that enabled to occur years of preventable American tragedies.

More Details for More Serious Studies of DOJ Corruption

Many actions were taken over the last 40 years as former federal agent Rodney Stich and his coalition of other insiders sought to make public the ongoing corruption in the government's aviation safety offices responsible for a continuing series of aviation disasters, and the criminal activities inflicting great harm upon the American people and the nation.

One reason−besides protecting their own direct or indirect role in the corruption−was to prevent the possible unpredictable public reaction if the people ever learned about what was being done to them. As the obstruction of justice tactics continued, with even worsening consequences for the public, it then became even more urgent that the public never finds out. That is the position existing today.

• Corruption in the FAA, and the steps taken to cover up for it.
   
• FAA inspector acting similar to an independent prosecutor, showing evidence between the culture and corruption in the FAA and the resulting continuing aviation disasters.
   
  • During the hearing Stich addressed the serious misconduct by people within the FAA that enabled to occur a long series of deadly airline disasters.
     
  • The 4500 pages of court transcript included his closing brief, in which he warned of the consequences if the hearing officer (a lawyer on the FAA administrator's staff) covered up.
     
  • During the several months that the hearings consumed, three more major airline disasters occurred. Each one caused by the very same problems that he repeatedly reported in writing. Two of the crashes were of United Airlines aircraft, where he had primary hands-on federal safety responsibilities, where there was a history of repeated fatal airline crashes, and where he repeatedly reported major safety violations and criminal activities.
     
  • Despite the overwhelming documentary evidence, and despite the three additional fatal airline disasters during the hearing, the FAA hearing officer, William Jennings, covered up, and praised the very people who were directly involved in the corrupt activities. As forewarned, and as expected, the continual series of preventable airline disasters continued for many years, before other factors reduced the frequency of such preventable airline disasters.
     
  • Prior to leaving the FAA, at the request of a friend who was the head of the Sky Marshal program, Stich submitted an explosive memorandum to the FAA administrator that required immediate action be taken instead of cavalierly ignoring it or criminally covering up for the major federal crimes. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
     
• Stich refused to work under such corrupt conditions and resigned. As the airline disasters continued to occur, with even a greater loss of life, he started what would be a life-long endeavor. One action was to file papers in the federal courts under two statutes: one was the federal crime reporting statute that made it a felony for anyone who knew of a federal crime not to report it to a "federal judge or other federal official."  He had already tried to report the crimes to FBI-DOJ people and to members of Congress while a federal agent and they all refused to receive the information. Since the statute specifically mentioned a federal judge, who had a mandatory administrative duty to receive the information, Stich thought this would force the issue. He then made several initial filings with the federal courts at San Francisco that addressed the corruption within the FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB).
   
• The other statute that invoked mandatory jurisdiction by federal judges was Title 28 USC § 1361. That statute permits anyone to seek an order from a federal judge forcing a federal official (FAA and NTSB) to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful conduct.
   
• Upon filing the actions, U.S. attorneys immediately filed motions to dismiss, claiming Stich lacked standing to file the action. Anyone has standing to report federal crimes, and many have been sent to federal prison for refusing to volunteer that information. Federal judges then acted on the obstruction of justice tactics by Department of Justice personnel by dismissing the actions, violating criminal statutes and statutes pertaining to federal court filings. Both groups then were legally shown as obstructing justice, making possible the continuation of the criminal activities, the crashes, the deaths, and the mutating of the corruption into other areas of government.
   
• Somewhere high in the federal government, and probably in the upper levels of the U.S. Department of Justice, the decision was apparently made to halt his activities. Since his considerable real estate holdings were funding them, the tactic used was to file a sham lawsuit to immediately separate him from these assets.
   
• Using a San Francisco law firm with ties to the CIA and the Department of Justice to file a sham lawsuit against Stich that immediately prevented Stich having access to the funds needed to continue his exposure activities. Dozens of state and federal statutes and case law prevented the filing and continuation of that cause of action. Over a dozen California judges aided and abetted the scheme, showing the power of whatever group was orchestrating the attempts to prevent stich from continuing with his exposure activities.
   
• The lawyers and judges involved in the scheme obviously knew of the many deaths associated with the corruption I sought to expose. They obviously knew that what they were doing would enable to continue the corruption, the criminal activities, and the deadly consequences. And the conditions did continue. An understanding of these matters would show that the same conditions that he discovered during his official duties and that he sought to expose and halt, were the same practices and culture responsible for the conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to so easily hijack four airlines on September 11, 2001. A ripple effect of their corrupt activities had many consequences, including the one-day brutal loss of 3,000 lives on 9/11. But these were only one-day's consequences!
   
• Since the continual six years of legal actions by California judges violated civil and constitutional rights, and violated federal laws, Stich filed the first of many actions in the federal courts, starting with the federal courts in Sacramento, California. The initial actions sought a halt to the actions by the CIA-front law firm and the California judges, and incurred the mandatory acceptance of jurisdiction by federal judges under the Civil Rights Act, under the Declaratory Judgment Act (to declare the validity of prior judgments that barred the sham California action).
   
• The sham lawsuit was filed by the San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross, and their lawyers, filed a dissolution of marriage action claiming that a former wife living in Duncanville, Texas, wanted a divorce and half of all of Stich's personal and corporate assets. That cause of action permitted California judges to immediately separate Stich from the assets. There were some major problems with that action:
   
  • The parties had been legally divorced since 1966 in a amicable divorce proceeding and all issues had been legally resolved and terminated.
     
  • That divorce judgment was entered as a local judgment in the states of Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, and California. Under state and federal statutes and case law, any one of those judgments were a final determination of the parties' divorced status and could not be challenged.
     
  • Emma Stich, residing in Duncanville, Texas, had been repeatedly declaring herself divorced in legal documents for the prior 20 years.
     
  • Massive numbers of state and federal statutes and case law prevented the lawsuit from being filed. Several statutes deprived California judges of personal or subject matter jurisdiction in family law proceedings on the basis of any of the five prior divorce judgments. California judges repeatedly violated these protections and repeatedly acted without jurisdiction over me or my assets.
     
• The obvious remedy and protection against anyone being subjected to any one of these dozens of violated statutes and case law had a constitutional and legal right to seek to halt the attacks by filing papers in federal courts. Stich did that in the federal courts at Sacramento and San Francisco, and in time, in other courts.
   
• Just as federal judges had done with preventing the reporting of the criminal activities, and just as California judges did in assisting the covert CIA-FBI-front law firm to continue with their sham lawsuit. In this way, a long line of federal judges openly violated numerous federal procedural and substantive laws. And knowingly, helping to block the reporting of the deadly criminal activities that were then in full bloom.
   
• A Daisy-Chain type of cover-ups then occurred. The repeated violations of dozens of state and federal laws, and the resulting personal and financial harm, invoked my right to continue to seek relief in federal courts. But it was now necessary to protect the conduct of prior federal judges directly involved in the obstruction of justice and those acting in a scheme with the San Francisco law firm, which indirectly obstructed justice by halting my exposure activities. Every lawsuit was dismissed, in gross violation of federal statutes, federal case law, and  constitutional protections. These included lawsuits seeking to report the corrupt activities that would play major roles enabling four groups of terrorists to so easily hijack four airliners on 9/11.
   
• To protect themselves, and further obstruct justice, federal judges then issued a series of unlawful and unconstitutional orders that for the remainder of my life, I am barred from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. In this manner, Stich was barred from reporting any of the subsequent criminal activities that he learned, either by personal discovery or from the dozens of other insiders that provided him with highly sensitive information on criminal activities adversely affecting national security. Stich then wrote books detailing and documenting these matters.
   
• Without the protections guaranteed to everyone else, and barred from seeking relief in federal courts, legal actions continued, involving federal judges and Department of Justice personnel, that eventually stripped Stich of the $10 million in assets that funded his exposure activities. The barrage of sham lawsuits and total denial of all state and federal protections resulted in federal judges in Las Vegas and Oakland stripping Stich of every asset that Stich had. This would surely prevent Stich from revealing the unusual and extensive information on widespread corruption in government. Which also insured that the resulting harm, which continued to spread, would not stop.
   
• Starting in 2001, nearly 20 years after the first sham lawsuit, other lawyers and law firms filed lawsuits against Stich seeking to seizee the books that he published and to further strip him of any remaining assets. The first was filed by a South Carolina law firm that had ties with the CIA. The law suit used as the plaintiff a person who had been earlier identified to Stich by a former National Guard officer and medical doctor as possibly involved in the murder of the his wife.
   
• The second lawsuit was then filed by a Los Angeles area lawyer and law firm, seeking to enlarge on what the South Carolina law firm was trying to do.

Years of Obstructing Justice
By Federal Judges

As in the information elsewhere at this site, what is said is highly documented in court and other documents.

• Documented pattern of corruption by federal judges that made possible some of America's worse tragedies.
   
• Documented pattern of corruption by Justices of U.S. Supreme Court, enabling major harm to national interests to occur.

Hoard of Lawyers Obstructing Justice:
Also with Deadly Consequences

Lawyers and law firms played a major role in the multiple corrupt and criminal activities that former federal agent Rodney Stich discovered with his many other insiders, and sought to expose. A sampling is shown here:

• Sham lawsuit filed by the San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross and their lawyers in the initial series of legal attacks that knowingly acted to halt the exposure of criminal activities that were inflicting great harm upon the United States and its people.
   
• Over a dozen lawyers and half a dozen federal judges involved in seizing and liquidating the $10 million in assets that funded the exposure activities. These activities continued from 1987 to 1998.
   
• South Carolina law firm filing a sham legal action to seize all books exposing the corruption and further strip the former federal agent of any remaining assets.
   
• Continuation of these attacks by Los Angeles area lawyer and law firm.

  By their actions, they became enablers in the horrendous terrorist attacks that were made possible by the corruption that former federal agent Stich sought to report.

Over a period of 40 years hundreds of letters and faxes were sent to the bribe-taking members of Congress, from 1965 to the present date, reporting the corruption related to an ongoing series of aviation disasters and criminal activities in other areas that former federal agent Rodney Stich and his coalition of other former government agents and insiders had discovered. Initially, the responses in the late 1960s admitted the gravity of the charges, but falsely stated the matters were not in their areas of responsibilities.

Tell that to the people jumping to their deaths from the World Trade Center building!

After those early responses, subsequent communications resulted in a zero response, probably because the recipients did not want to have a record made that would show they knew if the serious matters and failed to act.

• Sampling of letters sent to members of Congress on different areas of high-level corruption or criminal acts.