Sampling of Corrupt Acts by Federal Judges
This and related web sites, and the books described in them, and the various lawsuits filed to report criminal activities in government offices could evidence to fight corruption in key government offices. This page and its links will list some of the arrogant, unlawful, unconstitutional, and impeachable acts that activist Rodney Stich had documented.
Primary Ramifications of Legal and Judicial Corruption
Although many of the judicial activities described in this and the many other related sites relate to parallel legal and judicial acts against former federal agent Rodney Stich, it is important to remember two things about these schemes:
One, their primary goal was to block the reporting and exposure of corrupt and criminal activities, keeping the people from learning about these important matters that directly and indirectly adversely affects them.
Two, the ripple effects of their actions. Although ripple effects have had catastrophic consequences, their existence is virtually unknown.
One of countless examples in which the ripple effects occurred:
Blocking the reports of corruption in the government's aviation safety offices enabled the corruption to continue, as well as the consequences. The books, Unfriendly Skies: 20th and 21st Centuries, and Blowback, 9/11, and Cover-Ups, describe the many years of airline disasters arising from the corruption, and the four airline hijackings of 9/11 were simply one-day's consequences made possible by the legal and judicial schemes focusing on silencing the former federal aviation safety agent.
Insider Knowledge Never Again Available
Possibly never again will evidence of such serious judicial corruption be made available to bring about the urgent need to halt the rampant corruption in the courts. This knowledge, if properly used, and soon, can force changes, such as:
Statutes making judges financially liable for the harm them inflict upon any individual by unlawful, unconstitutional, or corrupt judicial acts.
Providing Ombudsmen to seek out the force changes to any of the corrupt judicial acts stated here.
Making judges comply with the rights and the responsibilities of any citizen who wants to report corruption in judicial or government offices, without being sent to prison for doing so.
Expose one of the biggest racketeering activities in the United States, the corruption in the bankruptcy courts that financially devastates thousands of people yearly.
Informing the public of widespread corruption in judicial and government offices, and prying the lid open on other crimes that are even more serious, including the many unreported scandals, the arrogant and corrupt war on drugs, the unconstitutional seizure of assets, the misuse of the conspiracy statutes, and much more.
Do nothing, and you are part of the problem and enabler of the resulting consequences.
Overview of Judicial Cover-Ups and Retaliation
The evidence indicates that the reason for the 20 years of documented judicial corruption was to block the reporting and the exposure of criminal activities that Stich and his group of other government insiders had discovered. A scheme was concocted somewhere in government that targeted the $10 million in real estate assets that funded his exposure activities. Without money, and destitute, it didn't require a rocket scientist to assume that Stich's expensive exposure activities would come to a prompt halt.
As a federal air safety inspector for the Federal Aviation Administration, responsible for air safety at the world’s largest airline, Stich documented a pattern of deeply entrenched air safety and criminal acts associated with a series of fatal airline crashes. These federal offenses prevented the federal government from carrying out its air safety responsibilities, resulting in many crashes and hundreds of deaths.
Included in the factors related to the fraud-related crashes were threats, harassment, and intimidation of federal air safety inspectors. Stich sought to correct the serious offenses by acting as a self-appointed independent counsel, conducting a four-month FAA hearing during which he obtained testimony and additional documentation proving the relationship between numerous specific airline disasters and the federal offenses. This hearing was followed by a cover-up that included top FAA officials, Justice Department personnel, and National Transportation Safety Board officers.
The combination of evidence and the obstruction of justice caused Stich to present evidence to a Justice Department-controlled federal grand jury in Denver where the obstruction of justice continued. Despite the obvious links between the criminal offenses and the tragedy-related crashes, the threats and harassment against Stich, a federal agent, continued, causing him to leave government service.
The subsequent escalation of fraud related crashes caused him to exercise federal remedies under the federal crime reporting statute (18 U.S.C. § 4) and the statute allowing any citizen to obtain an order requiring a federal official to comply with the law and halt unlawful conduct. (Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Stich filed several federal actions, and each time federal judges refused to perform their duties and promptly dismissed them. This refusal to perform a mandatory duty made possible the continuation of the air safety and criminal offenses, which in turn resulted in many crashes and many deaths. None of the guilty have ever been punished, or those who profited from their wrongful acts.
In an attempt to circumvent the obstruction of justice, Stich used his considerable assets to publish books, appear as guest and expert on hundreds of radio and television shows, give speeches, and place notices in various media publications. These activities were funded by his real estate assets, which at that time exceeded $10 million in value. Other federal agents started to provide Stich with additional information and documentation of such misconduct, which caused Stich to expand his “whistleblower” activities into other areas of corruption in government. These activities, funded by Stich's assets, threatened to expose people in key government and judicial positions.
After the second edition of Unfriendly Skies was published, which named federal judges who blocked the reporting of these federal offenses, a bizarre lawsuit was filed against him in the California courts that targeted the $10 million in real estate assets that funded his exposure activities. That lawsuit was barred by several dozen California statutes and rules of court, federal statutes, constitutional protections, and key Supreme Court decisions. Further, state statutes specifically deprived California judges of personal and subject matter jurisdiction for the cause of action that was filed. For that lawsuit to succeed, it needed the cooperation of large numbers of California judges (and eventually federal judges) who had a duty to immediately dismiss it.
Despite the absence of jurisdiction and the record setting violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections, California judges continued to render orders for the next six years that inflicted great personal and financial harm upon Stich. These repeated violations of not one, but many, civil and constitutional rights caused him to lose valuable properties, including over a quarter million dollar equity in his home.
The pattern of judicial obstruction of justice was accompanied by a pattern misusing the federal courts to render unlawful and unconstitutional orders inflicting great personal and financial harm, while subverting legal and constitutional defenses. The primary goal and effect of these documented acts of judicial misconduct was to block the reporting of criminal and subversive activities that Stich and his group of other former federal agents sought to report and bring to justice.
Exercising Federal Defenses
Defenses against these violations existed in the federal courts, and specifically under the Declaratory Judgment Act and the Civil Rights Act. Stich exercised these federal remedies, which should have promptly resulted in federal judges declaring the validity of prior judgments that adjudicated his personal and property rights, and an order halting the civil and constitutional violations.
Instead of performing this mandatory duty, every federal district and appellate judge before whom Stich exercised these federally protected rights refused to perform that duty, thereby aiding and abetting the major violations of federally protected rights.
Judicial Tactics to Block Federal Defenses
Judicial Tactics to Block Federal Defenses
The tactic used by federal judges to “support” their refusal to perform these mandatory duties was to reverse the legal definition of frivolous and place a frivolous label on Stich lawsuits that stated major record-setting violations of federally protected rights. Federal judges then expanded on these fraudulent holdings by labeling him a vexatious litigant for exercising federal remedies against the great numbers of documented violations of federally protected rights, and for attempting to report the criminal activities that he sought to report.
Continuing to Discover Criminal Activities
While the judicial scheme to silence one was escalating, Stich had continued to receive reports and documentation from other former federal agents showing the existence of criminal activities in other government and judicial offices. These sources included agents from such agencies as the FBI, DEA, Customs, INS, and the CIA, and included the former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial operations that had information of major criminal and even subversive activities. These criminal activities could not be reported to Justice Department personnel as they were themselves implicated through their obstruction of justice activities, a practice that he initially discovered as a federal investigator.
Stich then included in his lawsuits that were exercising federal remedies through a declaratory judgment and for the civil and constitutional violations a demand under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, that the judge receives, as part of his administrative duties, the reports and the evidence of the federal crimes from Stich and his group of other former federal agents.
Seeking to Report Federal Crimes in Additional Areas
The federal crime reporting statute requires that any citizen knowing of a federal crime must report it to a federal court or other federal tribunal. (Title 18 U.S.C. § 4) Although federal judges blocked this requirement several years earlier when Stich sought to report the criminal activities that he discovered as a federal air safety inspector, he again exercised this responsibility in 1986. Stich included a request to report and produce evidence of criminal activities with the lawsuits filed under the Declaratory Judgment Act and Civil Rights Act for the continuing violations occurring in the California and federal courts.
Credibility of Allegations
The credibility of Stich's allegations arose from the evidence of the judicial misconduct in judicial records, his former responsible position as a federal investigator, and the positions held by many of the federal agents who provided him with the information, including the boxes of documentation supporting their explosive information. Included in these sources were former heads of secret CIA airlines and secret CIA financial proprietaries.
Continuing Judicial Obstruction of Justice
Federal judges reacted to Stich's attempt to report the criminal activities as they reacted to being confronted with the record setting violations occurring in the California courts. First, they refused to receive the information and evidence of the criminal activities that Stich was seeking to report under Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 and promptly dismissed the actions at the pleading stage sometimes without notice.
Further, the mandatory responsibilities of federal judges (or any other federal officer) to receive information of alleged criminal activities does not depend upon whether the information is correct or not. The truthfulness of the reports cannot be determined until the reports are received.
Further, the felony arising from blocking the reports does not depend upon whether the information is true or not; the mere fact that the reports being made under the federal crime reporting statute are being blocked makes it a felony.
Combining Obstruction of Justice
With Massive Civil Rights Violations
Faced with Stich's attempts to report criminal activities implicating people in key government and judicial positions and the documented violations of large numbers of federally protected rights that invoked multiple federal defenses for him, federal judges commenced issuing unlawful and unconstitutional injunctive orders denying to him, for the remainder of his life, the right to federal court access.
These orders accomplished several purposes: they barred Stich from reporting the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute. Second, they blocked the federal defenses against the judicially perpetrated violations of federally protected rights that were devastating his personal and financial life. Stich was now literally stripped of every right and protection guaranteed under the laws and Constitution of the United States. These acts revealed the willingness of federal judges to destroy the protections under our form of government and in the process, cover up for criminal activities.
Judicial Retaliation for
Reporting Criminal Activities
The continuing series of judicial actions that consisted of civil and constitutional violations, and the gravity of the criminal activities upon the United States that Stich and his group sought to report, compounded by the literal judicial anarchy affecting major national interests, caused Stich to again file a federal action for subsequent federal civil rights violations and to report information about still other areas of corruption in key government and judicial offices. Federal judges then charged Stich with criminal contempt of court in retaliation for:
o Exercising constitutional due process specifically provided by the laws and Constitution against the large numbers of civil and constitutional violations. It is a federal crime under Title 18 U.S.C. § 241 for two or more persons to retaliate against a citizen for having exercised constitutional due process rights, and these judges were guilty of that offense numerous times.
o Reporting criminal activities to a federal court. It is a federal crime for anyone to inflict harm upon a former federal agent or witness to prevent him from reporting federal crimes or for having tried to do so. Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 3, 4, 35, 111, 153, 241, 242, 245(b)(1)(B), 246, 371, 1341, 1343, 1505, 1512, 1513(b), and 1515(a).
A combination of Justice Department prosecutors and federal judges then denied Stich a jury trial (what jury would convict for exercising constitutional defenses and for seeking to report corruption in government and judicial offices!), held Stich guilty, and then sentenced him to federal prison for six months. The sentence included being shipped repeatedly, in chains, from prison to prison, some of them county jails, and included six weeks in solitary confinement. Stich was almost 70 years of age at that time, being converted from a multi-millionaire to a state of poverty, stripped of all protections in law and having the power of the courts corruptly used to inflict enormous personal and financial harm upon me. Also, Stich had recently undergone open-heart surgery requiring six bypasses, and the strain and stress could have had fatal consequences.
Extending Judicial Corruption into Bankruptcy Courts
Several months earlier, Stich sought to force a federal judge to perform his duty under the Declaratory Judge Act and Civil Rights Act by filing Chapter 11 for his personal and his corporate assets. Although the law provided for this protection, Stitch had not known about the rampant judicial corruption in that segment of the federal courts. He soon learned.
Instead of providing relief, Stich discovered another area of judicial corruption in the Ninth Circuit courts. Bankruptcy judges Robert Jones and Edward Jellen escalated and carried out the original intent of taking the assets that funded Stich's exposure activities.
Federal judges unlawfully and unconstitutionally ordered the seizure of Stich's assets. They refused to provide the legal and constitutional requirement of a notice of hearing, a hearing, and legally recognized cause. They just took these assets, including his home, his businesses, and his sole source of income. The Supreme Court Justices, who have supervisory responsibilities over their conduct, refused to exercise their responsibilities.
Where Is the Secret Force?
A powerful force somewhere in government obviously had to be controlling massive violations of criminal and civil statutes in the California and federal courts, and felony cover-ups by large numbers of members of Congress and other groups.
Turning Assets Over to Known Embezzler
Federal judges turned Stich's assets, including his home, over to court-appointed trustee Charles Duck, who had been repeatedly charged with embezzlement by people whose assets were taken. Several years later, media publicity forced the Justice Department to file charges against Duck and reach a plea agreement providing for a short stay in a federal prison camp. Not bad for a trustee charged with the nation’s worst trustee embezzlement. The book, Defrauding America, describes Duck’s alleged involvement with the CIA. (Even if constitutional due process notice of hearing and hearing had been given, the corruption in the federal courts would probably still have seized his assets.)
After corruptly seizing Stich's assets, federal judges, including Oakland federal judge Edward Jellen, rendered orders barring Stich from filing objections to the judicial seizure and liquidation of the assets. The Mafia never had it this good.
After Stich exercised the legal and constitutional right to file objections to the seizure and liquidation of his assets, the filings were ordered unfiled. Federal judge Edward Jellen then charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for exercising these legal and cconstitutional due process remedies. It is a felony, under Title 18 U.S.C. § 241, for two or more people to retaliate against a citizen for exercising constitutional due process. Ninth Circuit district and appellate judges aided and abetted all of these corrupt, unlawful, and unconstitutional pattern of judicial acts perpetrated under color of federal law.
During the “trial” for criminal contempt of court, the federal judge refused to provide Stich with any of his funds to hire legal counsel, refused to provide a court-appointed counsel, refused to allow Stich to testify (not that it would have done any good), and then sentenced Stich to federal prison.
Over the next ten years, federal judges and the trustees, law firms and attorneys working in unison with them, liquidated all of Stich's assets, leaving him penniless. Pat of the assets went awarded to the parties perpetrating the violations of federally protected rights in the California and the federal courts.
Stich appealed these corrupt judicial acts to U.S. district courts in the Ninth Circuit at San Francisco, which was followed by a continuation of the denial of all due process remedies. In addition, federal judges and Justice Department lawyers charged Stich with criminal contempt of court for exercising the federal remedies on the basis that federal judges had issued orders years earlier barring Stich from federal court access for the remainder of his life, and these orders still exist today.
Supreme Court justices were repeatedly made aware of the pattern of judicial civil rights and criminal violations, from the very start, and instead of ordering the halt of these federal offenses occurring in their area of supervisory responsibilities, they aided and abetted the violations, which greatly increased the gravity of the judicial corruption. Further, it became clear that it was the Supreme Court Justices who was part of the powerful government force protecting everyone involved in the obstruction of justice and judicial misuse of the courts to carry out this goal.
Last Attempt--Prior to 9/11--to Report Criminal Activities
That Enabled Hijackers to Seize Four Airliners
In 1999, before the expiration of the statute of limitations, Stich filed a lawsuit in the U.S. district court at Reno. (MS Word) (Adobe PDF)
He promptly encountered a continuation of the total due process denial that he encountered during the prior 20 years. The Reno lawsuit sought relief under the Declaratory Judgment Act, the Civil Rights Act, Bivens, and RICO, and continued his efforts to report the criminal activities. As in the past, the court systematically blocked each of the federal remedies and the reporting of these inter-related civil and constitutional violations while protecting the California and federal judges, and CIA law firm, that repeatedly subverted large numbers of state and federal laws and constitutional protections.
Federal Judges Claimed Immunity
From Consequences of Their Criminal Acts
The district judge in that lawsuit promptly dismissed the defendant federal judges, holding that they were totally immune from the consequences of the charges that Stich alleged against them. When Stich filed a notice of appeal to their dismissal, Ninth Circuit court of appeal judges continue their pattern of refusing to recognize the timely filed notices of appeal. Stich was again totally barred from the protections guaranteed by the laws and Constitution of the United States against the corrupt, criminal, and unconstitutional acts of federal judges in the Ninth Circuit.
Stich's petitions to the U.S. Supreme Court exposing this pattern of obstruction of justice and subversion of the laws and Constitution were met with refusal to act. In this way, Supreme Court justices aided and abetted the subversive activities.
The obstruction of justice an related retaliation inflicted great harm upon Stich, and upon the United States.
Corruption and Cover-ups have Tragic Consequences
All forms of human tragedies have been inflicted upon the people of the United States from the corruption discovered by the people behind this site−and made possible by enablers in and out of government. The below pictures are only a sampling of the consequences from the documented corruption that are able to be portrayed graphically. The tragedies in other areas resulting from the corruption, cover-ups, and public indifference, are not shown here.
United Airlines crash into New York City, the world's worst at that time. Withheld from the Amererica public were the reports by federal safety inspectors-investigators showing a continuing pattern of corruption, fraud, criminal alteration of major government required records−and the standard abuse of those few inspectors attempting to require the airline management to comply with industry standards and clear requirements of federal aviation safety requirements−and FAA management to require compliance. None of the guilty, the enablers, to these and the continuing fraud-related crashes ever were held accountable for the hundreds of deaths that they enabled to occur.
These few examples of the horrors associated with airline disasters enabled to occur by documented corruption withheld from the American people. The standard culture of cover-ups in the United States enabled the corruption, cover-ups, to mutate into different areas. In the aviation area, although the continuing series of airline disasters eventually came to a halt for other reasons, the culture continued, and enabled to occur a number of easily preventable airline disasters. The inbred culture created the conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to easily hijack four airliners within a few hours of each other and kill nearly 3,000 people.
In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences.
Among the "Least" Guilty of the Enablers
It is important to realize that this pattern of hard-core documented judicial anarchy is not simply criminal and unconstitutional offenses against a targeted citizen. These are documented judicial acts showing a willingness of large numbers of federal judges to:
Destroy the legal and constitutional foundation upon which the United States was founded.
Aid and abet the criminal activities that Stich and a group of other federal agents had discovered. These criminal activities are inflicting great harm upon the internal security of the United States, upon its institutions, upon the judicial system, with the results that many deaths have occurred and great harm suffered by people throughout the United States.
These are not academic possibilities; they are real, and they have already happened. They affect major national concerns and national security. These judicial acts are aiding and abetting the criminal activities that are undermining the internal security of the United States. The documented pattern of repeated subversion of large numbers of legal and constitutional rights and safeguards, the misuse of judicial positions and the courts to inflict such grievous harm upon a former government agent for attempting to perform a moral and legal duty, shows the willingness of federal judges to destroy the legal rights upon which this country has been founded.
These documented judicial acts show that the Supreme Court justices continue to aid and abet this judicial anarchy, constituting a great threat to the United States and its people. All checks and balances have failed. If a few vocal and courageous people do not step in and use this information, the cancerous growth will continue to spread through the government and into the private sector. Stich performed his duty, and now it is time for a few courageous and civil minded citizens to help.
It is ironical that it was the crash and death-riddled corruption at United Airlines and within the Federal Aviation Administration, and Stich's attempts to single-handedly try to stop it, that ended in him suffering so greatly. But then, many who were cremated alive, dismembered alive, and the financial suffering of their loved ones, who also suffered. Stich, who once believed in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny, thought the American public, the government and non-government checks and balances, would exert some semblance of civil responsibilities and courage when they learned about these matters. How tragic!
Stich, in his upper 80s, continues to fight this powerful group of arrogant and corrupt federal judiciary and the others involved in the widespread corruption. No one has offered to help. the ACLU has actively aided and abetted this corruption. Groups complaining about judicial and other government continue to preach to the choir, complaining of matters that will never accomplish anything. Christians are too busy preaching to themselves and feeling good about themselves when their indifference or cowardice fuels the corruption.
Email address for the author and activist against corruption in government: email@example.com.
For more information relating to the author and his activities put "Rodney Stich" into a search engine such as Google or yahoo.com. The links run into many tens of thousands.
Download DVD videos from amazon to rent or to buy, onto your Windows XP operation system computer. For more information, click here.
To order a DVD video download, click on the following amazon link:
Cell phone and service deal from amazon.com, with 30-day return if not satisfied.
Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts.
available in various online pharmacies can be adopted to get back the normal sexual health once more at any age. Generic cialis
is also a drug which is highly adopted for the treatment of sexual dysfunction. This drug unlike any online pharmacy
other similar drug does not affect blood pressure of the patient under any circumstances and thus highly appreciated.