Crimianl statutes violated in schemes to prevent exposure of corruption in certain government offices.

<body> Federal Crime Reporting Statute Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). "Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." Federal judges repeatedly blocked Rodney Stich and his group of government agents from reporting the criminal activities implicating people in key government positions that they sought to report under this federal crime reporting statute. This obstruction of justice included district judges in San Francisco and Sacramento, and the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. These statements are documented in judicial records. These acts had serious consequences for the United States. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505. Whoever corruptly ... influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due the proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States ... shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This criminal act occurred several times as federal judges retaliated against Stich for making the reports. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1510. Obstruction of criminal investigation. (a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This criminal statute occurred as federal judges refused to receive the evidence that Stich and his group of government insiders sought to report. Federal judges refused to receive the evidence, retaliated against Stich for seeking to make the reports, and then rendered orders barring Stich for the remainder of his life from court access. In this way, Stich was unable to report the federal crimes (and also unable to use federal defenses against the judicial violations of federally protected rights that were inflicting great harm upon Stich. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to– (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to– (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. (c) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from– (1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding; (2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ... (3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or (4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation preceding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding; or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. (e) For the purposes of this section– (1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense; and (2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege. Federal judges, and directly Sacramento district judge Milton Schwartz and San Francisco district judge Marilyn Patel, aided by other judges, retaliated against Stich when he exercised the mandatory responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, to report federal crimes "to a federal judge." In this manner they were guilty of criminal acts under several criminal statutes. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant. (a) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for (1) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ..." Title 18 U.S.C. § 111. Impeding certain officers or employees. Whoever ... intimidates, or interferes with any person ... while engaged in ... the performance of his official duties shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... This crime occurred as management personnel at United Airlines and within the FAA interfered with FAA inspectors attempts to report major air safety violations and criminal cover-ups of them by false statements to the inspectors and falsified air safety documents. Many fatal crashes occurred between 1958 and 1978 that were caused by or made possible by these criminal activities. Title 18 U.S.C. § 35. Imparting or conveying false information (b) Whoever willfully and maliciously, or with reckless disregard for the safety of human life, imparts or conveys or causes to be imparted or conveyed false information, knowing the information to be false, concerning an attempt or alleged attempt being made or to be made, to do any act which would be a crime prohibited by this chapter or chapter 97 or chapter 11 of this tile--shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. [Aircraft and motor vehicles chapter.] These crimes occurred due to falsified documents within the FAA and at United Airlines; by the NTSB; by federal judges and others who placed false information in government records to halt Stich from exposing the corruption that he discovered. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1001. Whoever in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States knowingly and willfully falsifies, conceals or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact, or makes any false, fictitious or fraudulent statements or representations, or makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any false, fictitious or fraudulent statement or entry, shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... These criminal activities occurred repeatedly, in the matter of the airline crashes, and in the judicial proceedings described in the lawsuit and in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1621. Perjury generally. Whoever (1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal ... willfully and contrary to such oath states ... any material matter which he does not believe to be true, he shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... These criminal offenses repeatedly occurred in the sham lawsuit filed against Stich by a San Francisco law firm that was reportedly a front for the Central Intelligence Agency and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, and also occurred in the various federal proceedings described in the lawsuit. The perjury was done with the approval of California and federal judges acting in unison. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1622. Subornation of perjury Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. These criminal offenses were perpetrated in the sham lawsuit filed by the CIA-front law firm as they acted to seize the assets that funded Stich's exposure activities. Title 18 U.S.C. § 2. Principals. (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal. The legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who "aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures" another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. Federal judges repeatedly committed these criminal offenses by becoming accomplices as they blocked the reporting of the criminal activities, retaliated against Stich for seeking to make the reports, and shielded those who perpetrated criminal acts in court proceedings. Title 18 U.S.C. § 3. Accessory after the fact. Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact. Federal judges repeatedly became accessory after the fact as they protected the guilty through the cover-ups, obstruction of justice, retaliating against witnesses. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341. Frauds and swindles. Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, .... for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, places in any post office or authorized depository for mail matter, any matter or thing whatever to be sent or delivered by the Postal Service, or takes or receives therefrom, any such matter or thing, or knowingly causes to be delivered by mail according to the direction thereon, or at the place at which it is directed to be delivered by the person to whom it is addressed, any such matter or thing, shall be fined ... or imprisoned .... or both. These criminal violations occurred in the schemes to take Stich's assets, as described in the lawsuit and in the third editions of Defrauding America and Unfriendly Skies. The mail was used to carry out the schemes. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1343. Fraud by wire, radio, or television Whoever, having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, or for obtaining money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses, representations, or promises, transmits or causes to be transmitted by means of wire, radio, or television communication in interstate or foreign commerce, any writings, signs, signals, pictures, or sounds for the purpose of executing such scheme or artifice, shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. Telephones were used in carrying out the scheme. Title 18 U.S.C. § 245. Federally protected activities. (b) Whoever, whether or not acting under color of law, by force or threat of force willfully injures, intimidates or interferes with, or attempts to injure, intimidate or interfere with– (1) any person because he is or has been, or in order to intimidate such person or any other person or any class of persons [whistleblowers against corruption in government] from– (B) participating in or enjoying any benefit, service, privilege, program facility, or activity provided or administered by the United States; (C) applying for or enjoying employment, or any perquisite thereof, by any agency of the United States. All of the judicial acts taken against Stich arose from his attempts to expose criminal activities implicating people in key government offices and criminal activities in covert operations. Title 18 U.S.C. § 241. Conspiracy against rights of citizens If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; ... They shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... or both; This criminal act occurred several times as federal judges retaliated against Stich for reporting criminal activities which he and his group of several dozen present and former government agents discovered; and for exercising federal defenses against the record-setting repeated violations of state and federal laws and constitutional protections. These violations initially involved the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross (San Francisco) and their lawyers, and then evolved with the crimes perpetrated by California judges and then federal judges, among others. Title 18 U.S.C. § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or ..., shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; These violations were directly perpetrated by the CIA-front law firm and California judges, and then indirectly aided and abetted by federal judges. Title 18 U.S.C. § 246. Deprivation of relief benefits Whoever directly or indirectly deprives, attempts to deprive, or threatens to deprive any person of any employment, position, work, compensation, or other benefit provided for or made possible in whole or in part by any Act of Congress appropriating funds for work relief or relief purposes, on account of political affiliation [whistleblower] ... shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. These violations first occurred while Stich held the assignment in the FAA to correct the conditions responsible for the worst series of airline disasters in the nation's history. Then, the violations increased while as a private citizens seeking to expose the continuing criminal activities a CIA-front law firms and their lawyers, California judges, federal judges, and DOJ lawyers, inflicted grave personal and financial harm upon Stich as part of parallel schemes to keep him from exposing deadly criminal misconduct in government operations. Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy. Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 U.S.C. § 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; Federal judges were the main people who had the power to prevent the civil rights violations. Instead, they escalated them. Treasonous Conduct The definition of treason includes criminal attempts to destroy the lawful existence of government offices; a breach of allegiance, such as the allegiance to support the laws and Constitution of the United States. Subversive Conduct Subversive conduct is conduct that undermines and overthrows established authority of the government. Undermining the foundation of government. The judicial conduct that subverts the laws and Constitution of the United States, that obstructs justice, that aids and abets criminal activities, meet this definition. Severity of Crimes and Consequences Requires Longer Prison Sentence Federal sentencing guidelines require that anyone--and that includes federal judges and Justice Department lawyers--who in any way impedes the prosecution of criminal offenses shall have their length of imprisonment increased. The additional prison time depends entirely upon the severity of the criminal activities that their actions prevent from being reported or prosecuted. Title 18 U.S.C. § 34. Penalty when death results Whoever is convicted of any crime prohibited by this chapter, which has resulted in the death of any person, shall be subject also to the death penalty or to imprisonment for life ... Many deaths did occur, repeatedly, due to the violations of federal air safety and criminal statutes and regulations. Because of the fraud involved, the statute of limitations for anyone to sue United Airlines and the federal government has not yet started to run and won't start until the public has this information. Both parties can be sued even though prior lawsuits were settled, but settled without the knowledge of the fraud involved, which would justify huge punitive damages. Stich has the government documents that would justify the lawsuits. The refusal to receive the reports and evidence of criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute, the judicial retaliation, the unlawful and unconstitutional judicial orders barring access to the federal courts and thereby block the reporting of these criminal activities, the judicial and Justice Department retaliation for the federal filing seeking to report the crimes, and the retaliatory taking of Stich's assets, are all a part of the widespread judicial obstruction of justice for which the law requires much longer prison sentences based upon the enormity of the criminal acts being protected. Criminal Statutes Directly Involved with Blocking Reports of Criminal Activities Criminal act relating to anyone called "Principals" in the crimes: Title 18 U.S.C. § 2. Principals. (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal. Note: The legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who "aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures" another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. Case law decisions: Rothenburg v. United States, 1918, 38 S.Ct. 18, 245 U.S. 480, 62 L.Ed. 414, and United States v. Giles, 1937, 57 S.Ct. 340, 300 U.S. 41, 81 L.Ed. 493. Title 18 U.S.C. § 3. Accessory after the fact. Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact. This criminal statute relates to the actions taken by federal judges that hindered the apprehension, trial or punishment of those who committed federal offenses. Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both. This also relates to federal judges in two ways: first, they blocked the reporting of federal crimes which they must receive as part of their administrative duties under the federal crime reporting statute; and secondly, they did not convey this information to proper law enforcement personnel. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505. Whoever corruptly ... influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due the proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States ... shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This criminal act occurred several times as federal judges retaliated against Stich for making the reports. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1510. Obstruction of criminal investigation. (a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This criminal statute occurred as federal judges refused to receive the evidence that Stich and his group of government insiders sought to report. Federal judges refused to receive the evidence, retaliated against Stich for seeking to make the reports, and then rendered orders barring Stich for the remainder of his life from court access. In this way, Stich was unable to report the federal crimes (and also unable to use federal defenses against the judicial violations of federally protected rights that were inflicting great harm upon Stich. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant (b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to– (1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding; (2) cause or induce any person to– (A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ... shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. (c) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from– (1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding; (2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ... (3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or (4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation preceding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding; or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both. (e) For the purposes of this section– (1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense; and (2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege. Federal judges, and directly Sacramento district judge Milton Schwartz and San Francisco district judge Marilyn Patel, aided by other judges, retaliated against Stich when he exercised the mandatory responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. Section 4, to report federal crimes "to a federal judge." In this manner they were guilty of criminal acts under several criminal statutes. Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant. (a) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for (1) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense ..." Title 18 U.S.C. § 111. Impeding certain officers or employees. Whoever ... intimidates, or interferes with any person ... while engaged in ... the performance of his official duties shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... This crime occurred as management personnel at United Airlines and within the FAA interfered with FAA inspectors attempts to report major air safety violations and criminal cover-ups of them by false statements to the inspectors and falsified air safety documents. Many fatal crashes occurred between 1958 and 1978 that were caused by or made possible by these criminal activities. Further Information and Evidence Further information and supporting evidence on these matters, can be found at: Other pages at this Defrauding America site. At the Drugging America site. At the Unfriendly Skies site. And in books and their description site. Consider making your purchases of any item sold by or through amazon.com by going through the following links. This adds nothing to the cost, and helps fund out continuing efforts to expose corruption in the three branches of government. New Page 1 RETURN TO THE TOP <p>This page uses frames, but your browser doesn't support them.</p> </body>