Naive Assumption of Constitutional Protections In the United States For anyone to speak of the protections provided and guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States requires ignorance of how the alleged constitutional protections are violated. Massive evidence in government filings show that these constitutional rights and protections have been repeatedly violated, concurrent with criminal acts, by federal judges, Supreme Court Justices, and Department of Justice personnel. The very same people and groups paid, and entrusted, to protect such rights. The constitutional violations are not merely technical, or subjective. They have been associated with criminal acts, and with resulting great harm, deaths, and catastrophic events. In the example stated here, the repeated violations of constitutional protections were associated with actions to silence a corruption fighting whistleblower, exposing criminal activities resulting in great harm to national security. These violations followed his official life-and-death-assignment during the days of aviation disasters that sometimes occurred every few months. (These matters are unknown to today's trivia-obsessed American public.) The years of repeated, documented, gross violations of Constitutional rights and protections (in addition to dozens of violations of California laws and Constitution, federal laws, due process, and criminal violations) started in the following manner. His attempts to correct the aviation safety corruption responsible for a continuing series of deadly airline crashes at a major and politically powerful airline and the corruption within the FAA offices that aided and abetted the corrupt and even criminal acts. Later discovery by him and his group of former professional in government of wide spread criminal activities in government operations, resulting in great harm, deaths, and catastrophic events. These later discoveries included October Surprise, drug smuggling, financial, and other crimes by CIA and related personnel. His discovery of corrupt conduct affecting national matters, including terrorist enabling misconduct, then expanded from there. His fighting efforts to halt the corruption and resulting consequences. Acting similar to independent prosecutor. (Closing brief: www. Communications to members of Congress. www.defraudingamerica.com/letter_list_congress. Writing not-for-profit books. www.defraudingamerica.com/list_of_books. Appearing as guest and expert on hundreds of radio and TV shows, starting in 1978. Filing federal actions under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, to report the criminal and subversive information to a federal judge. To halt these efforts that threatened perpetrators in powerful government positions, Department of Justice personnel started a scheme to silence him, that unexpectedly spun out of control. The scheme started with a sham lawsuit filed by a San Francisco law firm with CIA-FBI connections that was barred by law, including dozens of state and federal statutes, landmark Supreme Court decisions. Further, California statutes specifically deprived California judges of personal and subject matter jurisdiction under the subject being filed. This unexpected event required the participation of others that had not been anticipated. Massive violations of California law and federal laws by the California judges. (Only one judge, California Supreme Court Justice Stanley Mosk, voted to hear the appeal of the violations. He lacked the majority and the violations were protected by the California Supreme Court Justices. California judges retaliated when Stich filed legal objections to the orders inflicting great personal and financial harm, that were filed because of the absence of jurisdiction and massive violations of state and federal laws. The violations by California judges continued for six years, from 1982 to 1987, inflicting great and irreparable personal and financial harm in gross violations of dozens of state and federal law and the theoretical protection of the California Constitution and federal Constitution. Throughout this six year period, Stich filed lawsuits in the federal courts on the basis of violations of federally-protected rights in the California courts by California judges, in a sham lawsuit filed by a CIA-FBI-front San Francisco law firm. Decades of Obstruction of Justice by Federal Judges, Combined with Gross Constitutional Violations, And Criminal Misconduct In related legal matters, federal judges repeatedly violated the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, by blocking the reporting of conduct that constituted federal crimes that had resulted in great harm to national security, deaths, and catastrophic events. These legal filings by corruption-fighting whistleblower, Rodney Stich, included the following samplings: www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_faa to report the criminal activities that he discovered during his official life-and-death-assignment, that were continuing to result in preventable airline disasters (and which played an unpublished enabling role in the hijackings of four U.S. airliners on September 11, 2001. www.defraudingamerica.com/lawsuit_against_ntsb, addressing the specific acts of covering up for political-sensitive enabling misconduct, and which was repeated later in such aviation disasters as the downing of TWA Flight 800. Lawsuit against personnel in U.S. Department of Justice. Lawsuit filed in the federal courts at Sacramento, during several al Qaeda terrorist attacks and just prior to the al Qaeda easily preventable hijackings of four U.S. airliners on September 11, 2001. Lawsuit filed in federal courts at Washington, DC, reporting the corrupt conduct that enabled the attacks to succeed. Filing was blocked by federal judges on basis of permanent denial of due process right to file papers in any federal court. The cover-up of criminal activities assisted in the serial lying preceding the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq, while covering up for the internal enablers responsible for insuring the success of the al Qaeda terrorists. Lawsuit filed in federal courts in New York City, which was blocked for a year from being filed by chief judge Michael Mukasey, causing Stich to send letters (December 16, 2002) to each of the U.S. Supreme Court Justices, advising them of the latest obstruction of justice by federal judges over whom they had supervising responsibilities. Further Evidence of Supreme Court Complicity Those letters again put the Supreme Court Justices on notice of the history of civil and constitutional violations, the criminal attacks upon the corruption-exposing whistleblowers, and the enormous resulting harm upon the United States and its people. Prior letters, including a January 2, 2002, letter to every Supreme Court Justice, shortly after the 9/11 attacks, made the Supreme Court Justices fully aware of the combination of massive constitutional violations by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities—and responsibilities under criminal statutes, that would again make them complicit through cover-ups. The documented corrupt acts brought to their attention—again—met the definition of subversive conduct against the United States, by people in control of major government offices responsible for preventing any crimes of this nature. Appeals to U.S. Supreme Court in each of these federal actions. No action. Stich gave up all judicial efforts due to the total complicity by dozens of federal judges and Supreme Court Justices, who by then were so thorough implicated in misconduct that enabled, among other great harm, the worst series of terrorist attacks in the nation's history. Every one was now required to treat these matters like the third rail, and that was done. www.defraudingamerica.com/letter_list_congress. Federal Judges, Supreme Court Justices, And Tragedy-Related Constitutional Violations Federal judges issued unlawful and unconstitutional orders permanently depriving the corruption-reporting whistleblower from filing any papers in any federal district or appellate court. Those blatantly unconstitutional orders, that made him a man without the rights and protections guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States. Those orders knowingly blocked him from reporting the criminal activities that were adversely affecting national security, and also blocked him from the federal and constitutional defenses from the attacks that converted him from a multi-millionaire to a state of poverty,, and sent a senior citizen to prison for trying to protect the United States from internal criminal attacks. If, on the other hand, the actions had been allowed to proceed, it is probable that the series of al Qaeda attacks could have been prevented from succeeding, and the nation would not be at war. Criminal Contempt of Court Charges for Exercising Constitutional Rights and Defenses Associated With Reporting Deadly Corruption Federal judges and Department of Justice personnel charged the corruption-fighting whistleblower with criminal contempt of court for reporting under the federal crime reporting statute the existing criminal activities in government positions that he and his group of other former government professional had discovered, that had resulted in great harm, and continued to do so by misconduct that enabled a series of easily preventable al Qaeda attacks to succeed. Denied the constitutional right to a jury trial, being prosecuted, tried, and judged by people and groups heavily involved in the corruption that was continuing to result in great harm to national issues, national security, and the people. Sentenced to six months in federal prison for attempting to excise a citizens right to report criminal conduct in government officials, and for exercising the responsibility to report crimes against the United States, as required by the federal crime reporting statute. Four week were in solitary confinement. This imprisonment occurred while recovering from open-heart surgery. | While in prison, federal judges, Department of Justice trustees (remember, their civil rights responsibilities!!) and a hoard of lawyers involved in the DOJ's scheme, seized and looted Stich's $10 million in assets, violating constitutional due process, federal laws, under criminal violations. Federal judges charged Stich with criminal contempt of court when he filed a legal objection to the seizure and liquidation of his life assets. Federal judges against changed Stich with criminal contempt of court as he was to be released from prison on the first charge, causing him to be under house arrest for five years, until 1995. An additional $500,000 in deposits in Reno financial banks disappeared through actions of the Department of Justice trustee, Charles Duck. These funds were in corporations that Stich was CEO. www.defraudingamerica.com/us_attorney_sfo_nov_8_2013.pdf. Constitutional Rights as Determined by Federal Judges, DOJ Personnel, and Supreme Court Justices— and Effects Upon United States, its People, And a Foolish Corruption-Fighting Whistleblower Acting as Ombudsman The determination and protection of constitutional rights and defenses are determined by federal judges—whose years of such acts are well documented in the case of a corruption-fighting whistleblower; further determined and protected by Supreme Court Justices; and by personnel of the U.S. Department of Justice that are paid and entrusted to protect such rights. Their degree of honesty and integrity are well documented. With a modest amount of intelligence, the consequences f their integrity can be seen in an amply supporting harm. Under federal obstruction of justice statutes, those who know of federal crimes and who cover up, are criminally complicit. Making their complicity more serious are the harm, the deaths, the catastrophic events, resulting from the corruption. Department of Justice personnel at the center of the greatest danger and enablers of great national tragedies and criminal and constitutional offenses against America's ombudsmen-like whistleblowers. The role of FBI and DOJ personnel in murders in the Boston and New York City offices would make the attacks against a corruption-exposing whistleblower in character. Dozens of Federal judges directly involved, and the dozens more who knew of these actions. Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. One exception may be Supreme Court Justice Byron White, who stated in an unprecedented personal letter and an even more unprecedented apology for not being able to help, implying he would help if other Justices assisted. Sampling of California judges involved in the DOJ scheme. Hoard of attorneys and law firms involved in the DOJ scheme, filing sham lawsuits against Stich, knowing they would greatly reduce his corruption-fighting activities and enabled the corruption and resulting tragedies to continue. Members of Congress engaged in the cover-ups, starting in the 1960s, and continuing to this day. The Ludicrousness of Assuming Constitutional Rights Exist for All in the United States Since all the groups in the three branches of government are entrusted to protect the rights and protections in the Constitution of the United States directly participated in grotesque violations of those rights, it is ludicrous and naive to imply that they exist. For anyone to talk about rights and protections in the Constitution of the United States, when those rights had been openly and with reference to criminal acts repeatedly violated, by the very people and groups paid and entrusted to protect those rights, automatically makes such rights meaningless. Making the mockery even worse, is the fact that the repeated criminally-related violations enabled the nation and its people to suffer so greatly, Knowing of these violations, it becomes a bizarre mockery to even imply that they exist. Americans' Unused Right to Fight: Not Available to the German People Under Adolf Hitler A poem was written by Martin Niemoller that depicts a fact of life that most Americans have yet to learn: First they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Jew. Then they came for the Communists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a Communist. Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out, because I was not a trade unionist. Then they came for me, and there was no one left to speak out for me. Pastor Martin Niemöller Pastor Martin Niemöller (1892–1984) first supported the rise of Adolf Hitler, and then upon learning the truth, and objecting, he was imprisoned. He wrote a poem about the state of denial of Germans about what Hitler was doing. Probably no better example could be shown than what has been done to the American people, in their name, while they lazily ignored the outrages. Fighting Throughout World War II to Fight a Greater Threat From Internal U.S. Enemies The corruption fighting whistleblower, now in his 90s, continues to fight America's greatest threat, coming from within powerful government positions, and enabling the successes of the external threats. (Where in the hell are the thousands paid to prevent this abomination!! American public, Hello!!) Rodney Stich was a Naval Aviator and Navy Patrol Plane Commander in World War II. He survived the entire war, unscathed, only to suffer an unprecedented personal and financial harm from years of attacks by people in one of the most corrupt nations on earth. www.defraudingamerica.com/stich_bio. www.defraudingamerica.com/vpb_108_stich.