Unprecedented Record-Setting Violations Of
State  and Federal Laws by California Judges

 

The following state and federal laws were repeatedly violated in a sham lawsuit  that was part of a scheme filed by a CIA-front San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross against corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich. His hundreds of appearances on radio and TV, his speeches, and his not-for-profit books were exposing areas of criminal activities in government that were enabling great harm to individual Americans, played enabling roles in a series of aviation disasters (some occurring in his immediate area of official responsibility), and were starting to enable terrorist successes.

 

As powerful people in government were being exposed, the sham lawsuit was filed. Because of the unprecedented numbers of laws that were violated, a powerful force in government was needed to enable the scheme to continue, to protect the perpetrators, and bar the exercise of legal and constitutional defenses.

 

The national importance of this is not was done to one citizen, but rather:


Sampling of Laws and Constitutional Violations
As Part of the Scheme

 

Absence of Personal Jurisdiction In California Courts


Absence of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

California and federal law required recognition of the prior judgments. The reason for labeling the action a dissolution of marriage action arose from the need to immediately seize Stich's assess to his funds on the sham argument that these were community properties.


Special Appearance Ignored and Violated


California Statutes Required Recognizing The
Prior Judgments That Settled the Matters

Under the Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act (California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1713.1 (2) defines a "foreign judgment" as "any judgment of a foreign state granting or denying recovery of a sum of money. The foreign judgment is enforceable in the same manner as the judgment of a sister state which is entitled to full faith and credit, ...

Code of Civil Procedure Code § 1908. Conclusiveness and Effect of Judgment. (a) The effect of a judg­ment or final order in an action or special proceeding before a court or judge of this state [is] ... conclusive be­tween the par­ties..... [extended to foreign country judgments by Civil Code Sections 5172, Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1653(j), 1713.3.]

The effect of a judicial record of a sister state is the same in this state as in the state where it was made, except that it can only be enforced here by an action or special proceeding ....  

Final judgment of a foreign country has the same effect as final judgment rendered in California.

The application of this title is limited by the requirement of the Constitution of the United States that full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.

"A foreign judgment ... is conclusive between the parties ..." (This protection is extended to foreign country judgments by Code of Civil Procedure § 1653(j), 1713.1, 1908, 1913, 1915; Civil Code § 5164; California Civil Code section 5164 provides that the registration of the 1966 divorce judgment with the Superior Court, Contra Costa County, and Superior Court, Solano County, shall provide not only the same recognition and protection against collateral attacks and relitigating (See e.g., Civil Code Section 4554) as is granted to California divorce judgments, but also enforcement of the judgments: A custody decree so filed has the same effect and shall be enforced in like manner as a custody decree rendered by a court of this state.

(a) The effect of a judgment or final order in an action or special proceeding before a court or judge of this state [is] ... conclusive between the parties..... [extended to foreign country judgments by Civil Code Sections 5172, Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1653(j), 1713.3.]


Absence of Jurisdiction over Separate
Property Under the Family Law Act

Either husband or wife may enter into any engagement or transaction with the other, or with any other person, respecting property, which either might if unmarried.

(a) Transmute community property to separate property of either spouse.

Civil Code § 5110.730. Marital Property−Written Declaration of Consent. [leg. in 1984. Does not affect transmutations occurring prior to its enactment.]
 

(a) A transmutation of real or personal property is not valid unless made in writing by an express declaration that is made, joined in, consented to, or accepted by the spouse whose interest in the property is adversely affected.
 

(c) This section does not apply to or affect a transmutation of property made before January 1, 1985, and the law that would otherwise be applicable to such a transmutation shall continue to apply.

Either spouse may make a gift of separate or community property to the other, which results in the property becoming the separate property of the donee. Estate of Cudworth (1901) 133 Cal. 462, 65 P. 1041; Estate of Walsh (1944) 66 Cal.App.2d 704, 152 P.2d 750.


Repeated Procedural Due Process Violations

 

California judges refused to recognize Stich’s special appearance status and absence of personal jurisdiction.  All orders were rendered without jurisdiction.


Violated Major Federal Laws
And Constitutional Protections


Violated Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

 

The California judges repeatedly violated rights established in U.S. Supreme Court decisions requiring recognition of prior divorce judgments and adjudicated personal and property rights, and rights acquired as a divorced person in prior states of residence. They acted as if they had advance approval that they would be protected against lawsuits in the federal courts for their deliberate and repeated civil rights violations:


Punishment for Exercising Due Process Defenses

 

Every attempt to halt the great and irreparable personal harm, and financial harm, resulting from the unprecedented number of violations resulted in California judges ordering Captain Rodney Stich to pay damages to the law firm filing  she sham action, sometimes thousands of dollars. This retaliation resulted in still more due process violations and constituted additional federal causes of action.


Sampling of California Judges Implicated


The Victim: Captain Rodney Stich:

 

His background and his credibility.

 

 


      Documentaries on 50 Years of Unpublicized Corruption In
Government Operations, and the Resulting Tragedies,
Provided by Unique Insiders 

Unprecedented in any Modern Industrial Nation
(Print available at www.amazon.com and  www.amazon.co.uk)
EBooks Worldwide

 

   

  

      

        

   


All of the books are available at amazon.com, in print and on digital formats, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich

Sampling of early books reviews

Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.

Credibility information:

More information about these books by clicking here.


EBook Sources

Print books from Amazon.com in Europe: http://www.amazon.co.uk./s/ref=nb_sb_noss/277-4275297-4922359?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=%22Rodney%20Stich%22