Start of Bizarre Scheme
To Silence Corruption-Fighter
As part of a scheme to silence corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, whose actions were threatening to expose powerful personnel in the federal government, a sham lawsuit was filed against him in the California Superior Courts at Fairfield, filed by the CIA-front San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross. That firm filed a sham lawsuit against Stich, used the former wife living in Texas as a straw plaintiff. The sham lawsuit was filed under the California Family Law Act, permitting a California judge to immediately gain control of the assets, and resulting in their loss.
Facts Showing the Sham Nature of the Lawsuit
The lawsuit declared that the Texas resident was the wife of Captain Stich, and she wanted a divorce and half of the community assets. The facts showed the sham nature of that claim:
Sixteen years earlier, while neither party resided in California, the parties divorced, and that 1966 divorce judgment was entered as a binding local divorce judgment in the states of Colorado, Oklahoma, Texas, Nevada—and California.
Legal documents in Texas showed the former wife declaring herself divorced in real estate sales and purchased, credit applications, and to the Social Security Administration.
She continued to declare herself divorced in Texas after the Friedman law firm filed the sham divorce action in California.
All of Stich's assets were acquired after the parties separate in Colorado, converting the properties, under law, outside of the community property doctrine if the parties were not divorced.
California Judges, At Every Level, Became Complicit in
The Corruption—and Enablers of Great "Events"
Further evidence of the criminal conduct by California judges, including the California Supreme Court, were the six years of the following violations of California and federal statutes, controlling decisional law, and landmark decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. To have repeatedly perpetrated those factual matters and massive legal blocks were prima facie evidence of a conspiracy and meeting the legal definition of a RICO criminal enterprise.
Six Years of Unprecedented Record-Setting Violations
Of California and Federal Laws
To carry out the scheme by the CIA-front San Francisco law firm, the following several dozen state and federal statutes had to be violated (with immunity provided at the federal level).
List of the dozens of California and federal laws that were repeatedly violated from 1982 to 1988, in a scheme where the evidence shows one example of the unpublicized corruption of non-elected powerful people in government. That situation has openly inflicted great harm to individual Americans and families, enabled decades of catastrophic consequences, and subverted the government of the United States.
Blissful ignorance by individual Americans will enable these tragedies to continue!
Bizarre Published California Court of Appeal Decision:
California Approval of Massive Civil Rights Violations
An initial bizarre and published decision was issued by the judges in the California Court of Appeal during the convoluted period. The decision implied that anyone moving to the State of California can be subjected to being remarried to someone from whom they were previously divorced while living in another state (and now maybe remarried). The basis, believe it or not: The above-the-law California judges could relitigate the priors court's jurisdiction, and invalidate that prior divorce judgment if the California judges felt that the parties in the prior divorce did not intend to live forever in the prior court's jurisdiction.
That stupid, illegal, and unconstitutional decision by Judges P.J. Low and J. Haning, was so bizarre, illegal, and unconstitutional, more suitable coming from inmates of a mental institution. Eventually, pressure from unknown sources caused it to be unpublished. That decision, In Re Marriage of Stich, 167 Cal. App.3d226—Cal.Rptr.—(Apr. 1985).
Since there was no marriage in fact or in law, the very title was bogus. Sampling of the order:
"The Court of Appeal affirmed, and imposed sanctions of $10,000 against the husband based upon its finding that his appeal was taken solely for the purpose of delay." [Appealing lack of jurisdiction, lack of a marriage, violations of dozens of state and federal laws improper? Provides an example of the degree of judicial lying in the California courts.]
"...substantial evidence, that the wife had demonstrated a fair or reasonable probability she would be successful in establishing the invalidity of the [prior divorce judgments]." Evidence showed the so-called wife had been declaring herself divorced for the prior 16 years and was continuing to do so; and had been entered as a local judgment in five other states.]
"As to the imposition of sanctions, the court held that every action taken by the husband [husband?] had been to delay as long as possible any requirement that he make any payment to the wife ... "
Implying the Same of the Highly Respected California
Supreme Court Justice Stanley Mosk
The above statements were made after the highly respected Justice of the California Supreme Court, Stanley Mosk, voted to hear the appeal. That is rarely done, and even more rarely when the appeal is in pro se, without an attorney.
Complicity of California Supreme Court Justices:
Exception, Justice Stanley Mosk
The Justices of the California Supreme Court were complicit in the above atrocities, with the exception of highly respected Justice Stanley Mosk. In a 1983 appeal to the California Supreme Court, Justice Mosk voted to hear the appeal. The continued support by every other California Supreme Court Justice for the unprecedented violations and criminalization of the California judicial system continued the outrages for the next five years.
Ironically, when these and other matters, related to the same goals of silencing the corruption-fighter, were presented in an Emergency Petition to highly respected U.S. Supreme Court Justice Bryon White, he implied the gravity of the issues presented, and then apologized for being unable—as a single justice—to help.
The California Supreme Court Justices at that time included Ronald George, Marvin Baxter, Armand Arabian, Joyce Kennard, Malcolm Lucas. Notices were sent to them keeping them informed of what they were allowing to occur.
California Supreme Court Justice Malcolm Lucas, March 25, 1990, and to the other Justices.
California Supreme Court Justice Marvin Baxter, July 22, 1994, and to the other Justices.
California Supreme Court Justice Marvin Baxter, May 18, 2002, and to the other Justices.
California Supreme Court Justice Ronald George, June 6, 2002, and to the other Justices.
Criminal Aspects of the Attacks and Conspiracy
Of the California Judges and Justices
Title 18 U.S.C. § 241. Conspiracy against rights of citizens
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; ... They shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... or both;
Unprecedented Civil Rights Violations by
California Superior, Appeal, and Supreme Court Judges
Under the Civil Rights statutes, anyone who knows of a civil rights violations, and has the ability to prevent them, and who fails to do so, becomes complicit and violates the law.
They violated in addition, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986.
Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. Action for neglect to prevent conspiracy
Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.
Multiple Stages of Attacks—And Multiple
Stages of Catastrophic Consequences
The first stage of the scheme originating within the U.S. Department of Justice started in the California courts, and with the planned sabotage by his own attorneys (another indication of the powerful people behind the scheme), it would soon be over. But Captain Rodney Stich's unexpected reaction, the plan misfired.
Unexpected Second Stage
Sabotaged by attorneys that he hired, and already literate in legal matters from prior use of the courts (to expose the corruption that he and his group discovered), he exercised the defenses in the federal courts. The unprecedented massive violations occurring in the California courts constituted major federal causes of action for which federal defenses existed. Federal judges had a mandatory responsibility to provide a federal court forum and relief. www.defraudingamerica.com/federal_judges_as_criminal_enterprise.
The powerful forces behind the scheme again surfaced. Over a dozen federal judges criminally misused their judicial positions to:
Protect the perpetrators in the California courts that were inflicting great and irreparable personal and financial harm through blatant and massive violations of state and federal laws.
Illegally and unconstitutionally denied Stich the right to a hearing in the federal courts.
Issued illegal and unconstitutional orders barring him from filing any legal papers in any federal district or appellate court. Those orders blocked him from reporting additional corrupt and criminal activities that he and his group were discovering, and enabled the massive civil and constitutional attacks to continue with immunity.
Criminal Contempt of Court Charge For Seeking Relief From The
Worsening Harm—and for Reporting Corrupt Activities
Enabling Start of Terrorist Successes
The criminal misuse of government power by Department of Justice personnel and federal judges, charged Captain Stich with criminal contempt of court after Stich filed papers under the federal crime reporting statute, Title 18 U.S.C. § 4, and simultaneously sought to halt the worsening personal and financial harm. That last tactic revealed the power of the secret force behind the scheme.
Kangaroo Court Proceedings
Federal judges—with the complicity of Department of Justice personnel—denied Stich the constitutional right to a jury trial, which then became a kangaroo court trial. He was charged, prosecuted, tried, judges, and sentenced by the same Department of Justice personnel and federal judges that were part of the groups involved in the corrupt activities that were enabling great harm, deaths, and catastrophic events. Worse catastrophic events would soon follow.
Seizing Life Assets That Had Funded Attempts
To Halt Corruption-Enabling Tragedies
Department of Justice personnel and federal judges seized and liquidated Captain Stich's life assets consisting of real estate, including his home, valued at $10 million (1988 values). The assets converted Stich from a multi-millionaire to a state of poverty, through blatant violations of federal laws and constitutional due process, with indications of criminal misuse of those government positions.
When Stich exercised his legal and constitutional right to file objections, he was charged with contempt of court.
The Third Stage: Criminal Complicity By
Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court
Starting in the 1970s, Captain Rodney Stich had filed federal actions under federal crime reporting statute, seeking to halt the horrific aviation disasters resulting form the corruption he had discovered during his official duties as a federal airline safety inspector. As he personally discovered and also learned from his confidants of other corruption. In every single instance, Department of Justice personnel and federal judges blocked the reports that they had a mandatory duty to receive. These were obstruction of justice crimes that he reporting in his radio and hundreds of radio and TV appearances, lectures, and his not-for-profit books. (The probable reason for the scheme to silence him.)
In almost every instance, Stich filed appeals or Emergency Petitions with the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court. They therefore were fully aware of the criminal acts that were crimes against the United States; the horrific consequences of the corrupt acts; the corrupt acts of federal judges over whom they had supervising responsibilities. They repeatedly protected the perpetrators, became enablers of the corruption and the tragedies. Those acts provided further evidence that something very serious exists in the powers that control the functions of the United States in a very harmful and subversive manner.
Never in the History of the U.S. Supreme Court!
One exception was the highly respected Supreme Court Justice Byron White. In response to a 60-page Emergency Petition sent to him by Captain Rodney Stich, that provided information on the corruption in government positions and the decades of resulting harm, and the corrupt attacks against Stich by Department of Justice personnel and federal judges, Justice Byron White sent Stich an unprecedented personal letter indicating his support, but apologizing. He said, "as a single justice, I can not help." That apology, in the face of such subversive misconduct and catastrophic consequences, raised still more questions abut secret powers in the federal government that can criminalize state and federal personnel.
One of many links to the misconduct by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court: www.defraudingamerica.com/supreme_court_justices_documentary.
Direct Ripple Effects Upon The
United States and Its People
For several decades before the 1982 start of the scheme, the harm from the corruption was recognized by knowledgeable insiders:
- Harm to individual Americans directly inflicted by arrogant and corrupt government personnel.
Series of corruption-enabled aviation disasters, including several aviation disasters while FAA airline safety inspector was under attack during his life-and-death-assignment.
Series of terrorist successes enabled by the corruption Captain Stich discovered and sought to halt.
- Harm to be expected.
- Tragedies after tragedies.
- American public as a feeding trough.
- Harm to people of other nations.
Continuing cover-ups and attacks on the corruption-fighter enabled continuation of the corrupt conduct of government personnel, including those in the California courts. The catastrophic type of horrors inflicted upon innocent people (in addition to the non-catastrophic type) included:
- Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie.
- World Trade Center bombing.
- U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
- Hijackings of four U.S. airliners on September 11, 2001.
The multiple areas of corruption that had a direct enabling effect for the horrific 9/11 events was then followed by the systemic corruption preceding the deadly invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq, both totally blameless for the al Qaeda attacks. That destabilized the entire Middle East and Africa, and generating world-record number of people and groups wanting to kill Americans. The domestic results of this has yet to be felt.
Documented Misconduct by California Judges
Met Criteria Of RICO Criminal Enterprise—
With Dramatic National Consequences
This posting provides information on one segment of a complex matter that enabled a series of national tragedies. The heavily documented misconduct by judges in the three upper levels of the California judicial system played an enabling role in these matters.
Multiple efforts were made to halt the efforts of corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, who was exposing serious and criminal misconduct that initially played enabling roles in a series of corruption-enabled aviation disasters, and at a later stage, the corruption he was exposing played enabling roles in a series of al Qaeda successes. Captain Rodney Stich has a long record showing his competence and credibility.
This posting addresses the complicity of judges at the three top segments of the California judicial system. Were it not for the criminal misuse of their judicial positions, it is very probable that the efforts of Stich and his group of other insiders could have succeeded in halting the corruption in high federal positions and brought a halt to the resulting harmful and catastrophic events.
Documentaries by Unique Insiders On 50 Years of(Print available at www.amazon.com and www.amazon.co.uk)
High-Level Corruption In Government—
And Resulting Consequences
Unprecedented in any Modern Industrial Nation
All of the books are available at amazon.com, in print and on digital formats, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich
Sampling of early books reviews
Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.
- Captain Rodney Stich bio.
- Sampling of commendations given to Stich over his lifetime.
- Evidence of Stich's credibility.
More information about these books by clicking here.
Print books from Amazon.com in Europe: http://www.amazon.co.uk./s/ref=nb_sb_noss/277-4275297-4922359?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=%22Rodney%20Stich%22.