Documented Misconduct by California Judges
Met Criteria Of RICO Criminal Enterprise—
With Dramatic National Consequences

 

This posting provides information on one segment of a complex matter that enabled a series of national tragedies. The heavily documented misconduct by judges in the three upper levels of the California judicial system  played an  enabling role in these matters.

 

Multiple efforts were made to halt the efforts of corruption fighter, Captain Rodney Stich, who was exposing serious and criminal misconduct that initially played enabling roles in  a series of corruption-enabled aviation disasters, and at a later stage, the corruption he was exposing played enabling roles in a series of al Qaeda successes. Captain Rodney Stich has a long  record showing his competence and credibility.

 

This posting addresses the complicity of judges at the three top segments of the California judicial system. Were it not for the criminal misuse of their judicial positions, it is very probable that the efforts of Stich and his group of other insiders could have succeeded in halting the corruption  in high federal positions and brought a halt to the resulting harmful and catastrophic events.


Start of Bizarre Scheme
To Silence Corruption-Fighter

 

The scheme involved filing a sham lawsuit in the California Superior Courts at Fairfield, filed by the CIA-front San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross. That firm filed a sham lawsuit against Stich, used the former wife living in Texas as a straw plaintiff. The sham lawsuit was filed under the California Family Law Act, permitting a California judge to immediately gain control of the assets, and resulting  in their loss.

Facts Showing the Sham Nature of the Lawsuit

The lawsuit declared that the Texas resident was the wife of Captain Stich, and she wanted a divorce and half of the community assets. The facts showed the sham nature of that claim:

California Judges, At Every Level, Became Complicit in
The Corruption—and Enablers of Great "Events"

Further evidence of the criminal conduct by California judges, including the California Supreme Court, were the six years of the following violations of California and federal statutes, controlling decisional law, and landmark decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court. To have repeatedly perpetrated those factual matters and massive legal blocks were prima facie evidence of a conspiracy and meeting the legal definition of a RICO criminal enterprise.


Six Years of Unprecedented Record-Setting Violations
Of California and Federal Laws

 

To carry out the scheme  by the CIA-front San Francisco law firm, the following several dozen state  and federal statutes had to be violated (with immunity provided at the federal level).

 

Absence of Personal Jurisdiction In California Courts


Absence of Subject Matter Jurisdiction

California and federal law required recognition of the prior judgments. The reason for labeling the action a dissolution of marriage action arose from the need to immediately seize Stich's assess to his funds on the sham argument that these were community properties.

Special Appearance Ignored and Violated


California Statutes Required Recognizing the Prior
Prior Judgments That Settled the Matters

Under the Uniform Foreign Money-Judgments Recognition Act (California Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1713.1 (2) defines a "foreign judgment" as "any judgment of a foreign state granting or denying recovery of a sum of money. The foreign judgment is enforceable in the same manner as the judgment of a sister state which is entitled to full faith and credit, ...

Code of Civil Procedure Code § 1908. Conclusiveness and Effect of Judgment. (a) The effect of a judg­ment or final order in an action or special proceeding before a court or judge of this state [is] ... conclusive be­tween the par­ties..... [extended to foreign country judgments by Civil Code Sections 5172, Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1653(j), 1713.3.]

The effect of a judicial record of a sister state is the same in this state as in the state where it was made, except that it can only be enforced here by an action or special proceeding ....  

Final judgment of a foreign country has the same effect as final judgment rendered in California.

The application of this title is limited by the requirement of the Constitution of the United States that full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.

"A foreign judgment ... is conclusive between the parties ..." (This protection is extended to foreign country judgments by Code of Civil Procedure § 1653(j), 1713.1, 1908, 1913, 1915; Civil Code § 5164; California Civil Code section 5164 provides that the registration of the 1966 divorce judgment with the Superior Court, Contra Costa County, and Superior Court, Solano County, shall provide not only the same recognition and protection against collateral attacks and relitigating (See e.g., Civil Code Section 4554) as is granted to California divorce judgments, but also enforcement of the judgments: A custody decree so filed has the same effect and shall be enforced in like manner as a custody decree rendered by a court of this state.

(a) The effect of a judgment or final order in an action or special proceeding before a court or judge of this state [is] ... conclusive between the parties..... [extended to foreign country judgments by Civil Code Sections 5172, Code of Civil Procedure Sections 1653(j), 1713.3.]


Absence of Jurisdiction over Separate
Property Under the Family Law Act

Either husband or wife may enter into any engagement or transaction with the other, or with any other person, respecting property, which either might if unmarried.

(a) Transmute community property to separate property of either spouse.

Civil Code § 5110.730. Marital Property−Written Declaration of Consent. [leg. in 1984. Does not affect transmutations occurring prior to its enactment.]
 

(a) A transmutation of real or personal property is not valid unless made in writing by an express declaration that is made, joined in, consented to, or accepted by the spouse whose interest in the property is adversely affected.
 

(c) This section does not apply to or affect a transmutation of property made before January 1, 1985, and the law that would otherwise be applicable to such a transmutation shall continue to apply.

Either spouse may make a gift of separate or community property to the other, which results in the property becoming the separate property of the donee. Estate of Cudworth (1901) 133 Cal. 462, 65 P. 1041; Estate of Walsh (1944) 66 Cal.App.2d 704, 152 P.2d 750.


Repeated Procedural Due Process Violations

 

California judges refused to recognize Stich’s special appearance status and absence of personal jurisdiction.  All orders were rendered without jurisdiction.


Violated Major Federal Laws and Constitutional Protections


Violated Landmark U.S. Supreme Court Decisions

 

The California judges repeatedly violated rights established in U.S. Supreme Court decisions requiring recognition of prior divorce judgments and adjudicated personal and property rights, and rights acquired as a divorced person in prior states of residence. They acted as if they had advance approval that they would be protected against lawsuits in the federal courts for their deliberate and repeated civil rights violations:

Punishment for Exercising Due Process Defenses

 

Every attempt to halt the great and irreparable personal harm, and financial harm, resulting from the unprecedented number of violations resulted in California judges ordering Captain Rodney Stich to pay damages to the law firm filing  she sham action, sometimes thousands of dollars. This retaliation resulted in still more due process violations and constituted additional federal causes of action.

 


Bizarre Published California Court of Appeal Decision:

Blatant Lies of Pathological Liars

 

An initial bizarre and published decision was issued by the judges in the California Court of Appeal during the convoluted period. The decision implied that anyone moving to the State of California can be subjected to being remarried to someone from whom they were previously divorced while living in another state (and now maybe remarried). The basis, believe it or not: The above-the-law California judges could relitigate the priors court's jurisdiction, and invalidate that prior divorce judgment if the California judges felt that the parties in the prior divorce did not intend to live forever in the prior court's jurisdiction.

 

That stupid, illegal, and unconstitutional decision by Judges P.J. Low and J. Haning, was so bizarre, illegal, and unconstitutional, more suitable coming from inmates of a mental institution. Eventually, pressure from unknown sources caused it to be unpublished. That decision, In Re Marriage of Stich, 167 Cal. App.3d226—Cal.Rptr.—(Apr. 1985).

 

Since there was no marriage in fact or in law, the very title was bogus. Sampling of the order:


Complicity of California Supreme Court Justices:
Exception, Justice Stanley Mosk

The Justices of the California Supreme Court were complicit in the above atrocities, with the exception of highly respected Justice Stanley Mosk. In a 1983 appeal to the California Supreme Court, Justice Mosk voted to hear the appeal. The continued support by every other California Supreme Court Justice for the unprecedented violations and criminalization of the California judicial system continued the outrages for the next five years.

 

Ironically, when these and other matters, related to the same goals of silencing the corruption-fighter, were presented in an Emergency Petition to highly respected U.S. Supreme Court Justice Bryon White, he implied the gravity of the issues presented, and then apologized for being unable—as a  single justice—to help.

 

The California Supreme Court Justices at that time included ......

 

 


 

Criminal Aspects of the Attacks and Conspiracy
Of the California Judges and Justices

Unprecedented Civil Rights Violations by
California Superior, Appeal, and Supreme Court Judges

 

Under the Civil Rights statutes, anyone who knows of a civil rights violations, and has the ability to prevent them, and who fails to do so, becomes complicit and violates the law.

They violated in addition, Title 42 U.S.C. § 1986. 

Every person who, having knowledge that any of the wrongs conspired to be done, and mentioned in the preceding section [42 USCS § 1985], are about to be committed, and having power to prevent or aid in preventing the commission of the same, neglects or refuses to do so, if such wrongful act be committed, shall be liable to the party injured, or his legal representatives, for all damages caused by such wrongful act, which such person by reasonable diligence could have prevented; and such damages may be recovered in an action on the case; and any number of persons guilty of such wrongful neglect or refusal may be joined as defendants in the action, and if the death of any party be caused by any such wrongful act and neglect, the legal representatives of the deceased shall have such action therefore, and may recover not exceeding five thousand dollars damages therein, for the benefit of the widow of the deceased, if there be one, and if there be no widow, then for the benefit of the next of kin of the deceased. But no action under the provisions of this section shall be sustained which is not commenced within one year after the cause of action has accrued.


The California Judges Were One Part  of
A Series of Actions Taken to Halt Exposure Of
Deadly High-Level Corruption

 

The California judges were part of a scheme, which evidence indicates originated within the U.S. Department of Justice. It requires the most powerful  people in the United States government to enable such unprecedented corrupt conduct and provide immunity to the parties.
 

To understand the gravity of this matter, the criminal and deadly role played by the California judges, and the ripple effects their misconduct enabled, requires more serious readings. A sampling of these very serious matters exists at the following locations, shown in the approximate sequences of events:

The conspiracy involving the California judges and the harm inflicted upon Captain Stich greatly hindered the attempts to halt the worsening corruption and the worsening series of catastrophic events. The ripple effects of the corrupt conduct of California judges will continue for generations.


     Documentaries by Unique Insiders On 50 Years of
High-Level Corruption In Government—
And Resulting Consequences
Unprecedented in any Modern Industrial Nation

(Print available at www.amazon.com and  www.amazon.co.uk)
EBooks Worldwide

 

   

  

      

        

   


All of the books are available at amazon.com, in print and on digital formats, and at many other Internet sites. They bring together the various pieces of the puzzle to better understand the overall picture, and why the same conditions continue year after year. Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich

Sampling of early books reviews

Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich.

Credibility information:

More information about these books by clicking here.


EBook Sources

Print books from Amazon.com in Europe: http://www.amazon.co.uk./s/ref=nb_sb_noss/277-4275297-4922359?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=%22Rodney%20Stich%22.


ordered Stich to pay over $100,000 in sanctions to the CIA-front law firm for exercising California legal defenses specifically intended for such violations. In addition, the court of appeal judges held that it was frivolous to exercise the defenses against the record-setting violations, and then retaliated against Stich. It is a criminal act to retaliate against a person for exercising due process remedies.

(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, or threatens another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to ──

(1) influence, delay or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding:

shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... or both. [1988 amended reading]"

 

 

Complicity of California Court of Appeal Judges

 

 California court of appeal judges became complicit by approving every violation that occurred during an eight-year period, ordered Stich to pay over $100,000 in sanctions to the CIA-front law firm for exercising California legal defenses specifically intended for such violations. In addition, the court of appeal judges held that it was frivolous to exercise the defenses against the record-setting violations, and then retaliated against Stich. It is a criminal act to retaliate against a person for exercising due process remedies.

(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, or threatens another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to ──

(1) influence, delay or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding:

shall be fined ... or imprisoned ... or both. [1988 amended reading]"