Violations by Federal Court of Appeal
Judges During Obstruction of Justice Tactics
voided, and approved, the issue of federal judges blocking the reporting of criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute--thereby protecting themselves and every prior judge whose obstruction of justice enabled catastrophic consequences to occur, including the hijackings on September 11, 2001.
Approved Judge Mukasey's decision that Stich had no standing to report criminal activities, some of which Stich had discovered after being given the assignment to correct the conditions responsible for the worst series of airline crashes in the nation's history. (Hundreds of people sentenced to federal prison for obstruction of justice, or failure to report a federal crime, would appreciate knowing that the same federal judges who sentenced them to federal prison have held that they lacked standing to have reported the crimes.)
Approved Judge Mukasey's decision that Stich was attempting to force a prosecutor to prosecute, despite the fact that Stich's complaint clearly stated he was seeking to report the criminal activities, as specifically required by the clear wording of the federal crime reporting statute. (Stich exercised his right to report the criminal activities to a federal judge instead of to members of Congress or Justice Department personnel because these same groups had for years refused to receive evidence of the criminal activities.)
Approved the numerous violations of federal statutes, case law, rules of court, and constitutional protections that were violated by the sua sponte dismissal by U.S. district judge Mukasey. The intent of these violations was to block the reporting of the criminal activities, and to deny to Stich the federal defenses needed to defend against the many legal violations that were parallel efforts to halt his exposure activities.
Approved the violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure rule 12 that barred dismissed if any single federal cause of action was stated in the complaint, for which federal remedies exist, and which required that the allegations stated in the complaint be recognized as true for opposing dismissal.
Approved the violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54 that required discovery, affidavits, and a hearing before a decision could be made to dismiss the filing.
Approved the unlawful and unconstitutional denial of a jury trial that was required on the matters permitted to be decided by a jury, including the matter of a conspiracy to obstruct justice and a jury under the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 57.
Approved the unlawful and unconstitutional orders permanently barring Stich from filing papers in any federal district and appellate court that were the tactics used by prior federal judges. These acted to and were intended to block Stich from reporting the criminal activities and block Stich from exercising federal defenses against the massive numbers of state and federal laws being violated in sham lawsuits filed to halt Stich's exposure actions. These initial violations were perpetrated in a sham and bizarre lawsuit filed by the CIA-front law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross, San Francisco, and their lawyers.
Approved the fraudulent practice of placing a frivolous label on every paper filed by Stich that reversed the legal and common-sense definition of the word. This sham reversal of the legal term was intended to support the unlawful, unconstitutional dismissal of Stich's filings--which included attempts to report the criminal activities that he and a group of other former government agents had discovered.
Approved the sham argument by Judge Mukasey claiming that sovereign immunity of the U.S. government barred each of the federal causes of action stated in the complaint. What had "sovereign immunity" to do with attempting to report criminal and subversive activities!
Approved the statement by Judge Mukasey that Stich's attempts to report the criminal activities were frivolous acts and that Stich "has overwhelmingly demonstrated that he is a vexatious litigant." Those jumping out of World Trade Center buildings may not have thought his attempts to report the criminal activities that enabled terrorists to seize four airliners on 9/11 were frivolous acts of a vexatious litigant!
Approved the false statement that no meritorious issue was raised in Stich's complaint , reversing that legal definition. (The families of the 9/11 hijacking victims may have a different opinion of that.)
Held that Judge Mukasey had not made any errors in its sua sponte dismissal, when in fact the dismissal was a record in the number of violations of criminal and civil statutes.
Held that their decision and that of district judge Mukasey was res judicata and collateral estoppel, when in fact the legal requirements for these legal matters were never met as there was never any hearing or adjudication of any of the issues. These terms meant that the issues stated in the Complaint had been adjudicated and decided after a trial.
Free books. For a listing of the books written by former government insiders on the continuing history of corrupt activities responsible for a continuing series of human tragedies, and to download at no charge segments of each of the books, click here.
These books are now the latest attempt by a coterie of lawyers and judges seeking to remove from public availability the books that expose their own complicity in the many areas of corrupt activities.
Email address for the author and activist against corruption in government: stich@unfriendlyskies.com.
For more information relating to the author and his activities put "Rodney Stich" into a search engine such as Google or yahoo.com. The links run into many tens of thousands.
Consider placing orders for any product from amazon.com through the following links. There is no extra cost or delay in doing this, while it provides us a small commission to help fund this site and our public-spirited efforts.
Return to: