Enablers of the hijacking of four airliners on 9/11.

<body> People and Groups Whose Misconduct Contributed to Success of the 9/11 Hijackers People in the U.S. Department of Justice have filed criminal charges against five al Qaeda members, and bring them to trial, on charges of aiding the success of the 9/11 hijackers. Simultaneously, the same DOJ personnel are continuing to cover up for people in the United States whose documented but unpublicized misconduct had an even greater role in making possible the success of the 9/11 hijackers. The misconduct of the unindicted enablers in the deaths of nearly 3,000 people include the documented actions of: People in the government's aviation safety agency (Federal Aviation Administration), whose responsibilities included preventing airline hijackings, that had been repeatedly reported as engaging in misconduct that had already been responsible for decades of preventable airline disasters. Years of preventable airline disasters were associated with that misconduct. People in the U.S. Department of Justice that had advance information of the 9/11 hijackings (and several other major terrorist attacks on U.S. targets that did occur), but withheld this information to prevent the public from learning about a series of murders involving a key FBI supervisor and the felony cover-up of those crimes by other DOJ personnel. Federal judges that repeatedly blocked a former federal agent from reporting corruption of people in the two government agencies that were most complicit in the 9/11 hijackings. Federal judges and DOJ prosecutors that corruptly misused their government positions to inflict great harm upon that former federal agent for attempting to report the corrupt activities. Hoard of lawyers and law firms that filed a series of sham lawsuits against the former federal agent in parallel efforts to halt his continued attempts to report and expose the corruption. Members of Congress who knew of these corrupt acts, and knew of the pre-9/11 harm made possible by the above conduct, and covered up for them (aka obstruction of justice) Media people and media corporations that knew of the above wrongful acts and prior catastrophic consequences, and repeatedly covered up for them. All of the people engaging in the above conduct obviously knew of the prior consequences, including the long history of aviation disasters, and cavalierly became enablers to 9/11 and other great tragedies. Quick description in full page media informational ads. The following woman, one of many jumping to her death from the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, was done of thousands whose life was brutally ended, made possible by many enablers to the 9/11 hijackers. Thumb Shell Highlights On the Yet-To-Be Exposed Ugliest Side to the 9/11 Disasters DOJ personnel withholding information on planned terrorist attacks obtained directly from a key al Qaeda cell through a Mafioso acting as a mole. Index of 9/11 files. Evidence on comparative responsibility for the conditions that enabled terrorists to so easily hijack four airliners on September 11, 2001. Building Blocks Insuring Series Of Great American Air Disasters The evidence of corruption that preceded the 9/11 airline hijackings was discovered and revealed in the following order: Discovery of a culture of corruption of key people in the FAA related to a series of preventable airline disasters. Discovery of additional criminal activities in other areas of covert and overt government operations, including the CIA and the FBI and other Department of Justice offices, which were adversely affecting national security. This culture played an enabling role in the easy hijackings of four airliners on September 11, 2001. This culture continues. Every attempt report these serious problems were blocked by people in key government positions, and especially by members of Congress, who were repeatedly informed of the deadly corruption. Their cover-ups continue after 9/11. Details and Evidence Showing Relationship Between 9/11 and Internal Enablers This sequence of events evolves around what Rodney Stich discovered during the past 40 years. Briefly, he was a Navy Patrol Plane Commander (PPC) in World War II, an international airline captain for many years, a key airline safety inspector-investigator for a number of years; a successful real estate investor; and then an author and activist against hardcore corruption in government. He was one of the most highly experienced pilots in the government FAA safety offices. The following is a more detailed sequence of how he and several dozen other insiders discovered endemic corruption in overt and covert government operations and the relationship to major tragic consequences: Discovery of vast areas of corruption in the government's aviation safety offices, associated with a series of airline disasters. In an attempt to report and halt the corruption, he spent over 20 years using tactics to circumvent the cover-ups by members of Congress, Justice Department personnel, and media cover-ups. Those measures included, for instance: Following the standard retaliation and cover-ups when government insiders seek to report high-level corruption, while a government agent, Stich exercised the law in such a manner, as never before done, he acted similar to an independent prosecutor, conducting several weeks of court-like adversary proceedings before an administrative law judge, William Jennings, a lawyer on the FAA administrator's staff. During the hearing, three additional major airline disasters occurred, each one was due to the exact same specific air safety problems and criminal violations that Stich had repeatedly reported in writing, and for which higher management blocked corrective actions. As part of the 4500 page hearing transcript, Stich submitted as part of his closing brief a warning that a cover-up would continue the corruption, which in turn would continue the fraud-related crashes−and the related high number of people killed. As expected, the hearing officer covered up for the corrupt activities and praised the very people whose misconduct enabled to occur several recent airline disasters and the deaths of several hundred people. During this entire period, Stich was notifying members of Congress of the corruption and the resulting crashes and deaths. Replies consisted of admission of the gravity of the charges, and then refusal to either receive Stich's evidence, refusal to conduct hearings, and refusal to request that congress's investigative body, the Government Accountability office, conduct an investigation. The cavalier cover-ups would enable many years of preventable airline disasters to occur. The latest ripple effects from the culture and the cover-ups occurred on September 11, 2001. Other than the standard practice of cover-ups in government, it is possible that another factor resulting in the cover-ups was possible public reaction if they learned of the relationship between the arrogance and corruption and the many deaths that resulted from the misconduct. (Deaths in airline disasters aren't a pretty sight!) Following the cover-up, Stich submitted to the FAA administrator, at the urging of a friend who was the head of the FAA's Sky Marshal program, a memorandum of specifics relating to the corruption, the crashes, the deaths, and the forewarned continuation of these matters. The lengthy report is shown here in three files (only suitable for serious readers): Part one (Adobe PDF) Part two (Adobe PDF) Part three (Adobe PDF) One segment in MS Word. Refusing to work under such a environment of arrogance, corruption, and repeated fatal airline disasters, Stich resigned from the FAA with the intention of fighting the corruption from outside of government. That decision would bring down upon Stich 20 years of continuous misuse of government offices, resulting in great personal and financial harm. Filing a series of lawsuits, starting in the late 1970s, seeking to report the criminal activities under the federal crime reporting statute and under the federal statute that permits anyone to seek a court order to require a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful conduct. Because of the many deaths that had already occurred, and were continuing to occur, from the misconduct, federal judges had an even greater responsibility to quickly allow Stich's attempts to report the problems to be heard. The initial lawsuits were against the FAA and NTSB. Under the federal crime reporting statute, a federal judge has a mandatory duty under his administrative duties to receive the information on the federal crimes that Stich discovered and documented while he was a federal airline safety inspector-investigator; and a mandatory duty to hear the lawsuit to determine whether Shortly after the lawsuits were filed, U.S. attorneys from the Department of Justice filed motions to immediately dismiss them, blocking Stich's attempts to report the federal crimes. Their argument was that Stich had no standing to file those actions. This bizarre argument flew in the face of the mandatory requirement to report federal offenses to a federal judge (or other federal officer), and failure to do so has resulted in federal prosecutors charging thousands of people with a federal crime. Those motions constituted blatant obstruction of justice tactics that would, if successful, continue the federal crimes and the resulting fatal crashes. Department of Justice personnel had previously blocked Stich's attempts to report the criminal activities while he was a federal agent, and even sought to block Stich's appearance before a federal grand jury in Denver while Stich was still acting as a federal agent. In response to the motions to dismiss, federal judges blocked the reporting of the criminal actives and dismissed the lawsuits. Stich appealed, and the appellate court judges, although admitting the gravity of his allegations, refused to reinstate the attempt to report the deadly corruption. In each case, Stich then filed appeals (called petitions for writ of certiorari) with the U.S. Supreme Court, making the Justices fully aware of the federal crimes (which they also must receive under the federal crime reporting statute) and of the obstruction of justice felonies by federal judges over whom they had supervisory responsibilities. Over a period of years, as Stich learned of other areas of corruption, and also sought relief from the endless series of judicial attacks that violated wholesale numbers of state and federal statutes and case laws and constitutional protection, other papers were filed with the Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court, making them complicit and enablers in the vast areas of corruption and the resulting consequences−some of which totaled the loss of many lives. The blocking of reports of major criminal activities continued the crimes, and as expected, the frequent occurrence of preventable airline disasters continued for another 15 years. With the occurrence of these great tragedies made possible by the obstruction of justice tactics by federal judges and Justice Department personnel, every subsequent federal judge that received lawsuits seeking to report still additional criminal activities had a choice to make: Continue the cover-up so as to protect the judges and Jus5tice Department personnel whose misconduct enabled to occur a continuing series of preventable airline disasters; or Perform their mandatory duty, exposing the corrupt activities of their fellow judges and enabling the public to see the relationship between the misconduct and the brutal ending of many lives. The decision was made to cover up, making many of thee subsequent airline disasters that could have been prevented, The decision was made to continue the cover-ups, cavalierly sacrificing the lives that were to be lost. With the continuing airline crashes resulting from the deep-seated culture, Stich then decided to use other tactics: publishing a book and appearing on hundreds of radio and television shows, naively expecting the public to respond with outrage. (He also in younger years believed in Santa Claus and the Easter Bunny!!) The first book was the first edition of Unfriendly Skies, being published in 1978. At that time, Stich had also been a real estate developer in rapidly growing California and had approximately $10 million in assets that funded his exposure activities. The publicity from these efforts did result in many letters from readers and listeners praising him for his efforts. His books also received excellent book reviews. His first book was published at almost the exact time that another major air disaster occurred: a PSA Airline 727 crash into San Diego, which took the record from the United Airlines crash into New York City on December 16, DC-10: One of Countless Fraud-Related Airline Disasters Misconduct by key people in the FAA, and the misconduct of those who covered up for the deadly culture, enabled other air disasters to occur. Very few people remember, or even heard of, the deadly problems associated with the DC-10, the crashes, and the near crashes. Among the many problems with the aircraft were: Dangerous cargo door mechanism that resulted in an explosive decompression at high altitude when the cargo door suddenly burst open, causing the cabin floor to collapse downward and into the control cables, making the aircraft uncontrollable. Engineers knew of the problems and in one company memo an engineer wrote that in the life of every DC-10, an explosive decompression would occur and everyone would be lost. The response to that memo was that if anything was said now, the question arises as to who would pay for the corrective actions. The same FAA management in the Western Region, that FAA inspector Stich had repeatedly reported as captives of the industry they regulated repeatedly covered up for safety problems and even criminal safety violations that resulted in a continuing series of major airline disasters. Only a very few insiders in the FAA knew of the documented misconduct that allowed major design problems to go uncorrected. After the most brutal of the DC-10 disasters, a plunge of a DC-10 into the ground near Paris, lawsuits were filed in the federal courts at Los Angeles. Because of the insider knowledge that former FAA inspector Rodney Stich possessed that showed the arrogance and corruption that resulted in that disaster, Stich filed a friend of the court brief, as shown by the following documents: Former FAA inspector Rodney Stich filing papers as amicus curiae (friend of the court) in multi-district lawsuit against the FAA, July 7, 1975. (Adobe PDF) Department of Justice filing opposing friend-of-the-court filing, August 13, 1975. (Adobe PDF) Stich filing amended friend-of-the-court brief, August 18, 1975. (Adobe PDF) Order by federal judge barring Stich from providing information and documentation on FAA misconduct that made the Paris DC-10 crash possible. Another example of how the public never hears of the corruption in government, as the system protects itself. September 12, 1975. (Adobe PDF) This was another breakdown in the checks and balances that permitted the deep-seated corruption to continue, along with the crashes and deaths, of which the 9/11 aircraft hijackings were simply one-day's consequences. Many information. Links Between Misconduct At United Airlines and 9/11 Key personnel at United Airlines were involved in massive safety irregularities that resulted in a continuing series of crashes and deaths, and even criminal falsification of government required records to cover up for costly safety requirements that were also standard at other airlines. Their misconduct fed up, or vice versa, the corrupt practices of key people within the government's aviation safety offices. The loss of two United Airlines aircraft to terrorists on September 11, 2001, were ripple effects from the misconduct years earlier of certain people at United Airlines and a great number of people within the FAA. Both of these groups engaged in corrupt, and even criminal activities, as described in Unfriendly Skies: 20th and 21st Centuries. The actions by both groups reinforced each other, effectively blocking the few competent and dedicated federal safety agents from enforcing government safety requirements. Many other crashes followed. But particularly ironic was that two of the four airliners hijacked on 9/11 were those of United Airlines. How ironic! And worst, as in the past, the misconduct by key United Airlines personnel in conjunction with key FAA management, resulted in the loss of other airliners, such as the two American Airline aircraft on 9/11. Showing the mindset of some United Airlines FAA-approved company check airman, the father of a female flight attendant that perished in a United Airlines Boeing 727 that crashed into the Pacific Ocean shortly after takeoff criticized FAA inspector for attempting to report and correct the endless series of safety problems, irregularities, and even criminal falsification of government-required records, so as to disguise the fact t5hat the legally required training and competency checks had not been accomplished. That crash into the Pacific Ocean, with the loss of over 100 lives−including his daughter, was due to: The absence of a backup-powered attitude indicator by which the pilots could maintain control of the aircraft in the event of one of the many total power failures that the airline had been experiencing. United Airlines was the only airline whose management ordered the aircraft without that basic safety instrument. After that crash, as with other United Airline disasters, FAA management was forced to finally order the installation of that instrument. The aircraft had illegally been flown for numerous flights with one of its three generators not functioning. Poor performance by the flight engineer. A malfunctioning engine fire warning sounded shortly after takeoff, followed by the engineer shutting down that engine. That engine had one of the two remaining generators, meaning that the entire aircraft electrical system would be operated by only one generator. A properly trained flight engineer would have realized that the enormous power-consuming galley power had to be first shut off. He failed to do this, and the pilots failed to warn him. What happened next was the usual failure of the remaining generator as it's shaft was sheared by the sudden heavy load imposed upon it. FAA inspector had repeatedly reported the fraudulent money-saving nature of United Airlines flight engineer training program, that most of their engineers were not competent to act as a flight engineer−which a number of UAL captains also admitted to the inspector. Every one of those safety problems had been previously reported by FAA airline safety inspector Rodney Stich. If there had not been so much corruption of key people at United Airlines and within the FAA, that United Airlines flight manager's daughter would be alive today! Details of that tragedy, and countless others, are in the book, Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries. More information from a totally new source about enablers related to 9/11. Corruption-Related Tragedies That Could Be Photographed All forms of human tragedies have been inflicted upon the people of the United States from the corruption discovered by the people behind this site−and made possible by enablers in and out of government. The below pictures are only a sampling of the consequences from the documented corruption that are able to be portrayed graphically. The tragedies in other areas resulting from the corruption, cover-ups, and public indifference, are not shown here. United Airlines crash into New York City, the world's worst at that time. Withheld from the American public were the reports by federal safety inspectors-investigators showing a continuing pattern of corruption, fraud, criminal alteration of major government required records−and the standard abuse of those few inspectors attempting to require the airline management to comply with industry standards and clear requirements of federal aviation safety requirements−and FAA management to require compliance. None of the guilty, the enablers, to these and the continuing fraud-related crashes ever were held accountable for the hundreds of deaths that they enabled to occur. These few examples of the horrors associated with airline disasters enabled to occur by documented corruption withheld from the American people. The standard culture of cover-ups in the United States enabled the corruption, cover-ups, to mutate into different areas. In the aviation area, although the continuing s4eries of airline disasters eventually came to a halt for other reasons, the culture continued, and enabled to occur a number of easily preventable airline disasters. The inbred culture created the conditions that enabled four groups of terrorists to easily hijack four airliners within a few hours of each other and kill nearly 3,000 people. In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences. Again, the system kept from the blissfully unconcerned American people the underlying enablers. The documented culture enabling to occur dozens of fatal airline disasters spread to other areas of government. One of the areas that most American will suffer from for many years to come is the recent housing and financial frauds. Even these ongoing events have not shaken the average American from their lack of outrage and efforts to finally use the documented material that is capable of making massive changes in the culture of greed and corruption. But that takes courage, integrity, effort−the evidence of which is sadly lacking. After 40 years of effort, this writer no longer expects the outrage and effort to occur to reduce the enormous extent of greed, corruption, cover-ups, and enablers. However, efforts are made to document and describe as accurately as possible what most Americans are helping to continue. Enablers to Great American Tragedies The groups that are included as enablers would include, for instance:\ The people engaged in corruption in the Federal Aviation Administration and the National Transportation Safety Board. Those key people at United Airlines, as detailed in the book, Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries. The 50-plus lawyers and law firms that for over 20 years, without letup, engaged in sham legal actions knowing they were blocking the exposure of deadly corrupt activities. The CIA-FBI-front San Francisco law firm of Friedman, Sloan and Ross and their lawyers; the South Carolina law firm and local judges; the Los Angeles law firm and cooperating California judges. The dozen and more California judges who aided and abetted the corrupt activities while violating dozens of state and federal statutes and controlling case law. The federal district and appellate judges, numbering over three dozen, who repeatedly violated federal crime reporting statutes and other statutes, who repeatedly blocked the reporting of the federal crimes despite their mandatory responsibilities under the federal crime reporting statute; those who engaged in felony retaliation against former federal agent Rodney Stich to silence his reporting, violating numerous criminal statutes; and the endless series of unlawful and unconstitutional actions that stripped Stich of his assets, his liberties, and his constitutional protections. Justice Department personnel who repeatedly covered up for the criminal activities, and who filed criminal contempt of court charges against Stich when he sought to report criminal activities that were inflicting great harm upon major national interests. Members of Congress who knew of the criminal activities from years of notices, especially those who have direct oversight over the people and groups committing them, and who to this day continue their cover-ups (i.e., obstruction of justice) Media people who knew of these criminal activities and related tragedies and helped subvert national interests by remaining silent. The many other people and groups who knew of these activities and joined in aiding and abetting the powerful groups. Comparison of Culpability for 9/11: Afghanistan, Iraq, or U.S. Enablers On the basis of blame for enabling the four groups of terrorists to so easily hijack four airlines on September 11, 2001, U.S. politicians started a war with Afghanistan, which is now in the eighth year, and a war with Iraq. The reason for carpet bombing and killing thousands of Afghanis was that the al Qaeda group was located in remote mountainous areas. One of the obviously false reason for starting the war with Iraq was that the country harbored al Qaeda terrorists. The Primary Enablers for 9/11 Were in the United States The conditions that allowed the four groups of terrorists to hijack four airliners had far more blame then either the obnoxious Afghan Taliban government or Iraq. Compare the reasons given for starting two wars with catastrophic consequences with the actions of the following people and groups in the United States. Documented corruption of people in the government's aviation safety offices had for decades enabled to occur a long line of easily preventable airline disasters. That conduct blocked the implementation of known measures that would have prevented the terrorists from hijacking the four airliners. The ripple effects that former federal agent Rodney Stich documented continued for years, crash after crash, with the 9/11 hijackings being simply more of the same. Federal judges, who repeatedly, starting in the late 1970s, committed felonies by blocking the reports of ongoing criminal activities associated with an ongoing series of tragic, deadly, and sometimes catastrophic events. These federal judges already knew the catastrophic consequences in prior airline disasters that resulted from the documented corruption−which they admitted as existing but that it was the responsibility of Congress. They knew that crashes and deaths would follow their cover-ups. They compounded these felonies by charging former federal agent Rodney Stich with criminal contempt of court after Stich attempted to report the crimes against the United States that were resulting in, among other harm, setting the stage for the nation's greatest terrorist attack in its history. That tactic constituted the additional felony associated with inflicting harm upon a former federal agent and witness to obstruct justice. Another irony of that is the the federal judges and federal prosecutor charging Stich with criminal contempt of court were themselves involved in various felonies associated with obstruction of justice schemes. Lawyers and law firms, over 50 of them, who filed a series of sham lawsuits against the former federal agent, from 1982 until 2005, knowing that their unlawful actions were hindering or halting the reporting of the ongoing criminal activities, which had gone far beyond just the corruption in the government's aviation safety offices. Their actions−parallel to and in support of the judicial obstruction of justice−made them enablers to a continuing series of tragedies, deaths, and most of all, the successful terrorist attacks upon the United States on September 11, 2001. Personnel in the U.S. Department of Justice, that repeatedly covered up for the criminal activities that was first reported to them by FAA inspector Rodney Stich, and then in later years as he discovered criminal activities on other covert and overt government operations. In addition, to cover-up for murders perpetrated by a key FBI supervisor in the New York City offices, FBI-DOJ personnel withheld the most important information that the United States had ever received from a key al Qaeda operative, which enabled to occur nearly 4,000 deaths in the subsequent terrorist attacks. Members of Congress, who for decades were informed by Stich, and a host of other insiders, about the corruption and related crashes and corruption in other areas. Their cover-ups of federal crimes constituted felonies under the obstruction of justice statutes, far greater than the offense of cover-up that sent hundreds of people to federal prison. Media people, who for years covered up for high-level corruption when it reaches a certain level of enormity, and their cover-ups of lying by powerful politicians. Other enablers that are identified in the book, Unfriendly Skies: 20th & 21st Centuries. Victims−and Enablers. None of the above primary enablers could have succeeded without the decades of indifference, determined illiteracy about corruption in government, apathy, and other problems, with the American people. No Question About the Greatest "Accomplices" to the 9/11 Terrorists When these matters are understood, it becomes obvious that the greatest help that the 9/11 terrorists had to insure their easy success at hijacking four airliners and killing nearly 4.000 people were people and groups inside the United States. Instead of blaming and killing hundreds of thousands of Afghanis and Iraqis, obviously the attacks should have been on people and groups within the United States, who had far more felony complicity with the success of the 9/11 terrorists! Enablers as Criminals In criminal law, people are accomplices, and guilty, if they know of a criminal act and fail to report it to proper authorities and also to take efforts within their capability to halt their continuation. And there are endless numbers of accomplices that are complicit in these crimes and enablers of the consequences. Again, the system kept from the blissfully unconcerned American people the underlying enablers. The documented culture enabling to occur dozens of fatal airline disasters spread to other areas of government. One of the areas that most American will suffer from for many years to come is the recent housing and financial frauds. Even these ongoing events have not shaken the average American from their lack of outrage and efforts to finally use the documented material that is capable of making massive changes in the culture of greed and corruption. But that takes courage, integrity, effort−the evidence of which is sadly lacking. Legal Definition of Criminal Acts Perpetrated by Enablers To really understand the extent of the people and groups that caused, or enabled to occur, many of the tragedies affecting people in the United States, it is important to realize the type of conduct described at this site and detailed and documented in the books are criminal acts−including those that resulted in deaths, such as the deaths of nearly 3,000 people on September 11, 2001. Understanding this will also show why the system will never correct itself, Complicity: The state or condition of a person who is involved as an accomplice. Accomplice: One who knowingly, voluntarily, and with a common interest with others, participates in the commission of a crime as a principal, accessory, or aider and abettor. Principal: Under federal statutes, he who, in the commission of an illegal act with others, such as maintaining an illicit still, conducting a burglary or a holdup, arms and instructs his confederates to kill if obstructed in the attempt, with the purpose and intent that they do so, is in law a principal in any willful killing which results from carrying out those instructions. Young v. United States (CA 5 Tex) 97 F2d 200. Accessory: A person who in some manner is connected with a crime, either before or after its perpetration, but who is not present at the time the crime is committed. 21 Am J2d Crim L § 115. Accessory after the fact: A person who, knowing a felony to have been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the felon, or in any manner aids him to escape arrest. 21 Am J2d Crim L § 126. Accessory at the fact: Persons who were present at the commission of a crime. Aiding and abetting: A term in criminal law, meaning the advising, counseling, procuring, or encouraging another to commit a crime. Aider: One who aids or abets; one who advises, co0unsels, procures, or encourages another to commit a crime. 21 Am J2d Crim L § 119. Abet: To give aid, to assist, especially in the commission of a criminal offense. To exertion of a force, physical or moral, joined with that of another in the perpetration of a criminal offense. Anno: 5 ALR 786. Abettor: One who aids, abets or instigates; one who advises, counsels, procures or encourages another to commit a crime. 21 Am J2d Crim L § 119 Murder Indictment for Refusal to Help One of many examples of how people seemingly remote from criminal acts can be legally guilty of complicity was shown by the following newspaper article: ROME, February 10, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Today Silvio Berlusconi, Italy's Prime Minister, who was spearheading an effort to save the life of Eluana Englaro with emergency legislation when news of her death came, has indirectly accused Italian President Giorgio Napolitano of complicity with murder for the latter's refusal to sign an emergency measure on Friday that might have saved her life. Stand by for More−or Worse−To Come! As former federal airline safety inspector Rodney Stich had repeated written in legal briefs and letters, cover-ups will result in a mutating of the corruption and a continuation of the resulting tragedies. Since cover-ups are a national culture, as well as apathy, prepare for even worse to come. Several of the Not-For-Profit Books Related To Widespread Internal Corruption Information on the books by former government agent Rodney Stich Sampling of early books reviews Sampling of complimentary letters/faxes to author/activist Rodney Stich. These books are available at amazon.com and other Internet locations and on the Kindle. Return to: www.defraudingamerica.com www.unfriendlyskies.com www.druggingamerica.com </body>